Audit 396694

FY End
2025-06-30
Total Expended
$30.59M
Findings
1
Programs
10
Year: 2025 Accepted: 2026-03-31

Organization Exclusion Status:

Checking exclusion status...

Contacts

Name Title Type
ZCPNEJ3THRH3 Lisa Rogers Auditee
5088244028 Grady Connor Auditor
No contacts on file

Notes to SEFA

The County of Bristol, Massachusetts (the County) is a governmental entity established by the laws of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts. All operations related to the County’s federal grant programs are included in the scope of the OMB Uniform Guidance. The U.S. Department of Treasury has been designated as the County’s oversight agency for purposes of the Single Audit. The accompanying schedule of expenditures of federal awards (the Schedule) includes the federal award activity of the County of Bristol, Massachusetts for the year ended June 30, 2025. The information in the Schedule is presented in accordance with the requirements of Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance). Because the Schedule presents only a selected portion of the operations of the County it is not intended to and does not present the financial position, or changes in the financial position of the County.
Accounting policies and financial reporting practices permitted for municipalities in Massachusetts are prescribed by the Uniform Municipal Accounting System (UMAS) promulgated by the Commonwealth of Massachusetts Department of Revenue. Expenditures reported on the Schedule are reported on the modified accrual basis of accounting. Such expenditures are recognized following cost principles contained in the Uniform Guidance, wherein certain types of expenditures are not allowable or are limited as to reimbursement. The information included in the Schedule may not fully agree with other federal award reports the County submits to federal awarding or pass-through entities.
The County has not elected to use the 10% de minimis indirect cost rate as allowed under the Uniform Guidance.
The County received non-cash assistance related to the Child Nutrition cluster (National School Lunch- Assistance listing #10.555), for the year ended June 30, 2025. Cash assistance – expenditures represent federal reimbursement for meals during the year. Non-cash assistance – represent food commodities received under a state distribution formula and are valued at federally published wholesale prices for purposes of this schedule. Such commodities are not recorded in the financial records, although memorandum records are maintained.
The County’s subrecipients for the year ended June 30, 2025, are associated with amounts paid for eligible program costs of the County’s Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds – Assistance listing #21.027. This is accounted for in the County’s American Rescue Plan Program. The County’s payments to subrecipients during the fiscal year ending June 30, 2025, are represented in the following table. Returned funds represent funds returned to the County on current year applications. Net amounts are reported in the accompanying Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards.

Finding Details

Criteria: The Uniform Guidance requires grantees to design and implement formalized internal control policies and procedures which address the compliance requirements associated with all federal programs administered by the grantee. Condition and context: The County has implemented a process for subrecipient monitoring through the third-party consultant which had been engaged in the overall assistance with administration of the program. Pursuant to the agreement with the consultant, the County agrees to assume all management responsibilities; oversee services; evaluate the adequacy and results of the services; and accept responsibility for the results of the services. As noted in the prior year audit, we recommended the County evaluate and enhance overall documentation as to the County’s specific administration and monitoring associated with the program. However, management has not formally documented how these responsibilities are met. Based upon our audit, we noted quarterly monitoring is being performed and reports submitted to the County. Based upon the progress of the program, it is expected only ongoing reporting requirements and monitoring of the subrecipients remain. Cause: Due to the nature of the award and complexities involved, the County (with other counties) were required to engage third parties to assist with the administration of the program. Effect or potential effect: Noncompliance could occur. Questioned costs: None. Auditor’s recommendation: We continue to recommend the County formally document its overall responsibilities (and documentation thereof) as to management responsibilities. This should include, but not be limited to: responsibilities, duties, extent and adequacy of monitoring, timeliness, evaluation and acceptance of results.