Audit 390658

FY End
2023-09-30
Total Expended
$3.78M
Findings
3
Programs
13
Year: 2023 Accepted: 2026-03-06

Organization Exclusion Status:

Checking exclusion status...

Findings

ID Ref Severity Repeat Requirement
1176733 2023-001 Material Weakness Yes N
1176734 2023-002 Material Weakness Yes N
1176735 2023-003 Material Weakness Yes N

Contacts

Name Title Type
LNHJU9EFAH61 Janina Trzmiel Auditee
2563830400 Jeremy Blackburn Auditor
No contacts on file

Notes to SEFA

The accompanying Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (the Schedule) includes the federal award activity of the Board under programs of the federal government for the year ended September 30, 2023. The information in this schedule is presented in accordance with the requirements of Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance). Because the Schedule presents only a selected portion of the operations of the Board, it is not intended to and does not present the financial position, changes in net position or cash flows of the Board.
Catalog of Federal Assistance Listing numbers are assigned to contracts and grants on the basis of program type. Federal Assistance Listing numbers and pass-through numbers are provided when available.

Finding Details

Criteria: 2 CFR 200.430 requires that costs of compensation be reasonable and properly supported to ensure charges are accurate, allowable, and properly allocated. Condition: During testing, it was noted that the Board was unable to provide a periodic certification for 11 employees who were paid under the Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Program (ESSER) - a subprogram of the Education Stabilization Fund (ESF). Cause: Documentation was not available to current management. Prior management was not available for inquiry. Effect: Costs for employees paid with ESSER funds is not able to be substantiated. Questioned Costs: $150,091 which includes known costs of $110,809 and likely questioned costs of $39,282. Recommendation: Management should implement a process and appropriate controls to ensure costs charged to federal awards are substantiated, accurate, allowable, and properly allocated and documentation of such is properly maintained. View of Responsible Officials: The Board concurs with this finding and has taken steps towards the reassessment of controls and will review these accounts and implement controls to ensure timely signatures on award certifications.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.305 requires entities requesting reimbursements to do so in a manner to minimize time elapsing between the transfer of funds to the entity and the payment of funds by the entity. Requests should be properly supported and approved prior to submission. Condition: Substantiating support was only available for one draw for reimbursement of funds. Cause: Documentation was not available to support draws for total expenditures. Effect: Not all reimbursement requests met the criteria to be properly supported and approved. Questioned Costs: $97,220. Recommendation: The entity should strengthen controls and procedures surrounding the cash management (or reporting) function. View of Responsible Officials: The Board concurs with this finding and has taken steps towards the reassessment of controls and will review these accounts and implement controls to ensure proper submission and approval over ESSER funds for reimbursement.
Criteria: For construction contractors exceeding $2,000, the contracting entity is required to communicate prevailing wage requirements in accordance with the Davis-Bacon Act. Additionally, the contractor is required to submit weekly certified payroll reports. Condition: During testing, 3 projects we identified for which no Davis-Bacon disclosure were made and no certified payrolls were provided. Cause: The entity did not identify the contracts as requiring compliance with the Davis-Bacon Act. Effect: See above condition. Questioned Costs: $282,074 which includes $247,708 of known and $34,366 of questioned costs. Recommendation: We recommend management implement a system of controls and procedures to ensure compliance with Davis-Bacon requirements. View of Responsible Officials: The Board concurs with this finding and has taken steps towards the reassessment of controls and will review these accounts and implement controls to ensure appropriate conditions are met according to the Davis-Bacon Act.