Audit 390144

FY End
2025-09-30
Total Expended
$208.85M
Findings
19
Programs
6
Year: 2025 Accepted: 2026-03-03

Organization Exclusion Status:

Checking exclusion status...

Findings

ID Ref Severity Repeat Requirement
1176310 2025-001 Material Weakness Yes L
1176311 2025-001 Material Weakness Yes L
1176312 2025-001 Material Weakness Yes L
1176313 2025-001 Material Weakness Yes L
1176314 2025-001 Material Weakness Yes L
1176315 2025-001 Material Weakness Yes L
1176316 2025-001 Material Weakness Yes L
1176317 2025-001 Material Weakness Yes L
1176318 2025-001 Material Weakness Yes L
1176319 2025-001 Material Weakness Yes L
1176320 2025-001 Material Weakness Yes L
1176321 2025-001 Material Weakness Yes L
1176322 2025-001 Material Weakness Yes L
1176323 2025-001 Material Weakness Yes L
1176324 2025-001 Material Weakness Yes L
1176325 2025-001 Material Weakness Yes L
1176326 2025-001 Material Weakness Yes L
1176327 2025-001 Material Weakness Yes L
1176328 2025-002 Material Weakness Yes B

Contacts

Name Title Type
M177YHEQMG91 Russell Selkirk Auditee
9729735447 Ali Hijazi Auditor
No contacts on file

Notes to SEFA

The federal expenditures from the schedule of expenditures of federal awards reconcile to grant revenue in the basic financial statements as follows: See the Notes to the SEFA for table

Finding Details

Assistance Listing Number, Federal Agency Number, and Program Name ALN 20.106, U.S. Department of Transportation Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), Airport Improvement Program (AIP) Federal Award Identification Number and Year N/A Pass through Entity N/A Finding Type Significant deficiency Repeat Finding No Criteria The FAA requires organizations to file FAA Form 5100 126, The Financial Government Payment Report, annually within 120 days after the Airport's fiscal year end. Condition There were no controls in place for the annual report for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2025 to ensure the report contained accurate information and was sent timely to the appropriate FAA airports office. Questioned Costs N/A If Questioned Costs Are Not Determinable, Description of Why Known Questioned Costs Were Undetermined or Otherwise Could Not Be Reported N/A Identification of How Questioned Costs Were Computed N/A Context Although the report was complete and accurate and filed timely, there was no documented control in place to ensure the annual report was submitted accurately and timely. Cause and Effect The lack of a control to ensure timely submission of a complete and accurate annual report to the appropriate FAA office could result in the Airport submitting incomplete, inaccurate, and/or late reports. Recommendation We recommend the Airport ensure internal controls are in place to ensure complete and accurate annual reports are submitted timely. Views of Responsible Officials and Corrective Action Plan A review of FAA Form 5100 126 will be conducted with ap propriate personnel, such as the Controller or Vice President, Treasury Management prior to submitting to the FAA. Review and timely submission will be evidenced via time stamped DocuSign or other electronic means such as an acknowledgment via email.
Assistance Listing Number, Federal Agency, and Program Name ALN 20.106, U.S. Department of Transportation Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), Airport Improvement Program (AIP) Federal Award Identification Number and Year 3 48 0064 161 2025 Pass through Entity N/A Finding Type Significant deficiency Repeat Finding No Criteria The Code of Federal Regulations, specifically 2 CFR 200.303, requires grant recipients establish, document, and maintain effective internal control over the federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the recipient or subrecipient is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award. Condition The controls in place to review the final grant packet, including the grant drawdown template and the drawdown invoice detail, prior to final processing of the drawdown were not operating as designed. Questioned Costs $21,452 If Questioned Costs Are Not Determinable, Description of Why Known Questioned Costs Were Undetermined or Otherwise Could Not Be Reported N/A Identification of How Questioned Costs Were Computed The questioned costs represent the total of all nonconforming costs reduced by the Airport's 25 percent match that were charged to the grant. Context Although the two invoice packets properly identified the $28,603 of non conforming costs out of $25,412,561 incurred, the grant drawdown template that was prepared did not exclude these ineligible costs and the review of the grant drawdown template did not identify the error prior to final processing of the drawdown. Cause and Effect The ineffective control to ensure accuracy of the grant drawdown template prior to final processing of the drawdown resulted in unallowable costs. Recommendation We recommend the Airport ensure internal controls are in place to ensure accurate information is included in the final processing of the drawdown. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions Treasury will work with PMM and DCC departments to out line a process to ensure accurate reporting of eligible expenses when invoices are re viewed for compliance with grant program requirements. The process will be documented and adhered to once agreed by all departments. A review process for the final drawdown submission will also be adopted to ensure costs that are identified as ineligible are appropriately excluded from the final submission.