Audit 387919

FY End
2025-06-30
Total Expended
$5.68M
Findings
1
Programs
8
Year: 2025 Accepted: 2026-02-18

Organization Exclusion Status:

Checking exclusion status...

Contacts

Name Title Type
MEYBCY9A6WC9 Christina Bugarin Auditee
3232689191 Christine Abell Auditor
No contacts on file

Notes to SEFA

The accompanying schedule of expenditures of federal awards (the Schedule) includes the federal award activity of Via Care Community Health Center under programs of the federal government for the year ended June 30, 2025. The information in this Schedule is presented in accordance with the requirements of 2 CFR Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance). Because the Schedule presents only a selected portion of the operations of the Via Care Community Health Center, it is not intended and does not present the financial position, changes in net assets or cash flows of the Via Care Community Health Center.
Expenditures reported on the Schedule are reported on the accrual basis of accounting. Such expenditures are recognized following the cost principles contained in the Uniform Guidance, wherein certain types of expenditures are not allowable or are limited as to reimbursement. Negative amounts shown on the Schedule represent adjustments or credits made in the normal course of business to amounts reported as expenditures in prior years.
Via Care Community Health Center has elected to not use the 10% de minimis indirect cost rate allowed under the Uniform Guidance.

Finding Details

During our compliance testing of sliding fee discounts for the Organization, there were two instances in which the sliding fee discounts were calculated incorrectly. During our testing of revenue transactions, five instances of incorrect charge rates in the Practice Management System were identified. We note that the compliance finding was immaterial to the program overall. A random sample of sixty-five encounters was reviewed, including forty sliding fee encounters selected for compliance testing. Two of the forty sliding fee selections were incorrectly calculated. Five of the twenty-five remaining selections resulted in incorrect charge rates in the Practice Management System.