Audit 376810

FY End
2025-06-30
Total Expended
$3.35M
Findings
3
Programs
9
Organization: Huntingdon Area School District (PA)
Year: 2025 Accepted: 2025-12-22

Organization Exclusion Status:

Checking exclusion status...

Findings

ID Ref Severity Repeat Requirement
1165884 2025-002 Material Weakness Yes N
1165885 2025-002 Material Weakness Yes N
1165886 2025-002 Material Weakness Yes N

Programs

Contacts

Name Title Type
KPA2ECH2JDP6 Jon Guyer Auditee
8146412120 David M. Scott, CPA Auditor
No contacts on file

Notes to SEFA

The Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards has been prepared on the accrual basis of accounting. Revenues were adjusted to balance the expenditures incurred for each project.
Expenditures reported on the schedule are reported on the accrual basis of accounting. Such expenditures are recognized following the cost principles contained in the Uniform Guidance, wherein certain types of expenditures are not allowable or are limited as to reimbursement. The Huntingdon Area School District has elected to not use the 10% de minimis indirect cost rate allowed under the Uniform Guidance.
An extensive compliance test, as required by Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance) was performed on the Education Stabilization Fund and Child Nutrition Cluster programs which represent 58.43% of the total expenditures reflected on the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards. The Education Stabilization Fund and Child Nutrition Cluster programs exceed $1,339,284 and therefore, represent the only programs to which the specific compliance requirements must be applied.
USDA Donated Commodities are valued at market value, which represents the costs to replace those items.

Finding Details

Material Weakness in Internal Control Over Compliance Finding 2025-002 Child Nutrition Cluster #10.555 and #10.553 Paid Lunch Equity Condition: The District did not have internal control over compliance procedures designed and implemented for the compliance of Paid Lunch Equity requirements. Criteria: Internal control best practices for federal programs woudl dictate the District have internal control over compliance procedures designed and implemented for the review of Paid Lunch Equity calculations. Cause: Internal control over compliance procedures were not designed and implemented to ensure proper preparation and review of the Paid Lunch Equity calculation. Effect: The could potentially result in material noncompliance with federal program requirements and potential financial loss. Recommendation: We recommend that the District design and implement documented internal control procedures to ensure proper preparation and review of the Paid Lunch Equity calculation. Auditee Response: The auditee understands and agrees with the finding. The auditee will develop and implement procedures for the review of the Paid Lunch Equity calculation.