Audit 375358

FY End
2025-06-30
Total Expended
$2.10M
Findings
9
Programs
1
Organization: City of Caseville (MI)
Year: 2025 Accepted: 2025-12-17

Organization Exclusion Status:

Checking exclusion status...

Findings

ID Ref Severity Repeat Requirement
1165093 2025-004 Material Weakness Yes ABGHILM
1165094 2025-005 Material Weakness Yes ABGHILM
1165095 2025-001 Material Weakness Yes ABGHILM
1165096 2025-004 Material Weakness Yes ABGHILM
1165097 2025-005 Material Weakness Yes ABGHILM
1165098 2025-001 Material Weakness Yes ABGHILM
1165099 2025-004 Material Weakness Yes ABGHILM
1165100 2025-005 Material Weakness Yes ABGHILM
1165101 2025-001 Material Weakness Yes ABGHILM

Programs

ALN Program Spent Major Findings
21.027 CORONAVIRUS STATE AND LOCAL FISCAL RECOVERY FUNDS $441,382 Yes 3

Contacts

Name Title Type
GKAAQLM1RJW1 Jamie Learman Auditee
9898562102 Kylie Braun Auditor
No contacts on file

Notes to SEFA

The accompanying schedule of expenditures of federal awards (the "schedule") includes the federal award activity of the City of Caseville, Michigan under programs of the federal government for the year ended June 30, 2025. The information in this schedule is presented in accordance with the requirements of the Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance). Because the schedule presents only a selected portion of the operations of the City of Caseville, Michigan, it is not intended to and does not present the financial position, changes in net position, or cash flows of the City of Caseville, Michigan. The City does not qualify for low-risk auditee status. Management has utilized the United States Department of Treasury in preparing the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards. The City does not pass through federal funds.
Expenditures reported on the schedule are reported on the modified accrual basis of accounting for the general fund and the accrual basis of accounting for the water and sewer funds. Such expenditures are recognized following the cost principles contained in the Uniform Guidance, wherein certain types of expenditures are not allowable or are limited as to reimbursement. Negative amounts (if any) shown on the schedule represent adjustments or credits made in the normal course of business to amounts reported as expenditures in prior years. The City of Caseville, Michigan has elected not to use the 10-percent de minimis indirect cost rate allowed under the Uniform Guidance.
The federal expenditures reconcile to the amounts reported in the City's financial statements as follows: See the Notes to the SEFA for chart/table
Amount expended in prior year. No receivable was recorded.

Finding Details

Criteria: It is the responsibility of the accounting staff to perform the year-end closing procedures and prepare the appropriate year-end closing entries in order to ensure that the year-end financial statements are not materially misstated. In addition, the year-end closing procedures should be supervised and reviewed by City officials that possess an adequate knowledge of the City’s activities during the fiscal year. Condition: This year, as in the past, we assisted the accounting staff with the basic year-end bookkeeping and accounting procedures that are necessary to prepare the books for audit purposes. This also included the preparation of several year-end adjusting entries that were necessary to keep the financial statements from being materially misstated. Cause: Management does not have the expertise necessary to prepare the year-end adjusting entries or other procedures so that the accounting records are ready for financial reporting and audit purposes. Effect: This situation could allow the misstatement of the financial statements. Recommendation: We recommend that the City acquire the expertise necessary to perform the year-end closing procedures so that the annual financial statements can be prepared in accordance with U.S. GAAP. Response: We are aware of this deficiency and believe it is not cost beneficial in our situation to acquire this expertise. We will continue to use our external auditors for this technical assistance. We would expect this situation to be ongoing in future years.
Criteria: The responsibility for the City’s annual financial statements prepared in accordance with U.S. GAAP rests with the management of the City. Management is also responsible for the system of internal accounting controls used to ensure that the financial statements are not materially misstated. Condition: Along with assisting with the year-end closing procedures to the City’s accounting records, we also assisted the City by preparing the annual financial statements (including related notes) of the City prepared in accordance with U.S. GAAP. Cause: Management does not have the expertise necessary to prepare the financial statements in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. Effect: This situation could allow the misstatement of the financial statements. Recommendation: We recommend that the City acquire the expertise necessary to prepare the annual financial statements including the related notes in accordance with U.S. GAAP. Response: We are aware of this deficiency and believe it is not cost beneficial in our situation to acquire this expertise. We will continue to use our external auditors for this technical assistance. We would expect this situation to be ongoing in future years.
Criteria: Management is responsible for the internal controls that address the assertions related to financial reporting and compliance requirements related to the City’s federal award programs. Management is responsible for designing and implementing a system of internal controls which include written policies and procedures for how various accounting transaction reporting will be performed and documented for federal award programs. Condition: Although the City appears to have a system of internal controls for federal award programs in place, the City does not have written policies and procedures that outline how accounting and transaction reporting will be performed and documented for federal award programs. This is a requirement of the Uniform Guidance. Cause: Due to the small size of the City, a complex system of internal controls for federal award programs has not appeared necessary. This has resulted in management not taking the time to document written policies and procedures over federal award programs. Effect: This situation could allow noncompliance with the Uniform Guidance and federal regulations to occur. Perspective: While we consider this finding to be a significant deficiency, we do not perceive it to negatively impact the audit opinions issued. This is a systemic problem caused by a lack of experience within the City related to the Uniform Guidance. The City is actively working to remedy the situation. Recommendation: We recommend that the City implement written policies and procedures over federal award programs. Response: The City acknowledges this situation and agrees that this recommendation would help strengthen internal controls. The Board of Trustees is working to implement written policies and procedures over federal award programs.