Audit 373449

FY End
2025-06-30
Total Expended
$1.02M
Findings
1
Programs
6
Year: 2025 Accepted: 2025-12-08

Organization Exclusion Status:

Checking exclusion status...

Findings

ID Ref Severity Repeat Requirement
1163628 2025-002 Material Weakness Yes EN

Programs

ALN Program Spent Major Findings
14.157 SUPPORTIVE HOUSING FOR THE ELDERLY $634,624 Yes 1
10.415 RURAL RENTAL HOUSING LOANS $191,987 Yes 0
14.872 PUBLIC HOUSING CAPITAL FUND $67,358 Yes 0
10.447 THE RURAL DEVELOPMENT (RD) MULTI-FAMILY HOUSING REVITALIZATION DEMONSTRATION PROGRAM (MPR) $63,606 Yes 0
14.850 PUBLIC AND INDIAN HOUSING $31,109 Yes 0
10.427 RURAL RENTAL ASSISTANCE PAYMENTS $28,160 Yes 0

Contacts

Name Title Type
LSPHN5PGDJG3 Julie Gockley Auditee
3088825321 Jeffrey J Wiens Auditor
No contacts on file

Notes to SEFA

The outstanding balance of the Section 202 Capital Advance mortgage was $615,700 at June 30, 2025. The outstanding balance of the Multi-Family Housing Preservation and Revitalization Restructuring Program Grant Agreement mortgage at June 30, 2025 was $62,329.46. The outstanding balance of the Rural Rental Housing Loan at June 30, 2025 was $186,162.21.

Finding Details

Finding 2025-002: Internal Control Structure Section 202 Capital Advance, 14.157 Material Weakness - Eligibility, Special Tests and Provisions Repeat Finding – Finding 2024-003 Criteria: The Authority is responsible for establishing an effective internal control process to ensure the Authority complies with the requirements governing the Section 202 Capital Advance program. Condition: The Authority only had one administrative employee which makes it difficult for the Authority to have controls beyond the Authority Manager’s knowledge. As a result, we noted the Authority had a lack of segregation of duties related to all applicable compliance requirements. Cause: The Authority has limited resources and one staff. Effect or Potential Effect: The control deficiencies are deficiencies that result in more than a reasonable possibility that material noncompliance with program requirements could occur and not be prevented or detected. Recommendation: As noted above, the Authority has limited resources and additional controls are not financially feasible in the hiring of additional staff. In addition, the Board of Commissioners is considered a governing Board and the Board performing management or day-to-day activities is not recommended based on our previous experience and is not intended to be a solution to this situation. The Authority is a small entity and the lack of segregation of duties is common among entities with minimal employees and should be recognized as such. However, it is not our intent to establish internal controls as the Authority’s Board should make the final determination in the cost versus benefit. View of the Responsible Officials of the Auditee: The auditee’s management agrees with the finding but can not reasonably adopt internal control procedures to correct the material weakness.