Audit 371422

FY End
2024-12-31
Total Expended
$26.58M
Findings
2
Programs
17
Organization: City of Pueblo, Colorado (CO)
Year: 2024 Accepted: 2025-10-28
Auditor: RUBIN BROWN LLP

Organization Exclusion Status:

Checking exclusion status...

Contacts

Name Title Type
NJK3BNUDRHJ7 Danny Nunn Auditee
7195532622 Matthew J. Marino Auditor
No contacts on file

Notes to SEFA

The accompanying schedule of expenditures of federal awards presents the activity of all federal award programs of City of Pueblo, Colorado (the City), for the year ended December 31, 2024. All federal awards received directly from federal agencies, as well as federal awards passed through other governmental agencies, are included on the schedule.
The accompanying schedule of expenditures of federal awards includes the federal grant activity of the City and is presented on the modified accrual basis of accounting. The information in the accompanying schedule is presented in accordance with the requirements of Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (the Uniform Guidance). Therefore, some amounts presented in the schedule may differ from the amounts presented in, or used in, the preparation of the basic financial statements.
The City has elected not to use the 10 percent de minimis indirect cost rate allowed under the Uniform Guidance.

Finding Details

The City is required to comply with the Federal Funding Accountability and Transparency Act of 2006 (Transparency Act or FFATA) for direct grants. The Transparency Act was created to empower Americans with the ability to hold the government accountable for each spending decision and, as a result, to reduce wasteful spending by the government. The Transparency Act requires the federal government to make certain information on federal awards available to the public. In accordance with the Transparency Act, the City is required to report information about subgrants, or subawards, given to other governments or to nonprofit organizations, also referred to as subrecipients. Federal regulations [2 CFR 200.1] define a subaward as an award provided by a pass-through entity, in this case the City, to an entity to carry out part of a federal grant award received by the pass-through entity. A subrecipient is defined in federal regulations [2 CFR 200.1] as “an entity, usually but not limited to non-Federal entities, that receives a subaward from a pass-through entity to carry out part of a federal award; but does not include an individual that is a beneficiary of such award. A subrecipient may also be a recipient of other Federal awards directly from a federal awarding agency.” The City is required to submit FFATA information through the Federal Funding Accountability and Transparency Act Subaward Reporting System (FSRS). Once the City submits a report to FSRS, the public can view information from the report, including the subrecipient’s name, subaward identification number, subaward obligation/action date, subaward amount, federal awarding agency and subagency, the City’s name, and the Citty’s grant award identification number. The City omitted the FFATA reports for CDBG. he City did not have a control over FFATA reporting. Without sufficient review and monitoring controls, the FFATA reporting required for the grant was not performed by the City. The City should implement internal controls for CDBG and all direct grants by developing policies and procedures to ensure that it complies with requirements under the Federal Funding Accountability and Transparency Act. These procedures should include requirements to maintain supporting documentation, including evidence of timely submission and subaward documentation for awards made to subrecipients, as required. The City agrees with the finding and has put together a correction action plan for the finding. See corrective action plan included in this report.