Audit 363023

FY End
2024-12-31
Total Expended
$3.27M
Findings
4
Programs
7
Organization: City of Marshfield, Wisconsin (WI)
Year: 2024 Accepted: 2025-07-25

Organization Exclusion Status:

Checking exclusion status...

Findings

ID Ref Severity Repeat Requirement
571937 2024-002 Significant Deficiency - I
571938 2024-002 Significant Deficiency - I
1148379 2024-002 Significant Deficiency - I
1148380 2024-002 Significant Deficiency - I

Programs

Contacts

Name Title Type
HTVRTED68TY7 Jennifer Selenske Auditee
7154862067 Jon Trautman Auditor
No contacts on file

Notes to SEFA

Title: BASIS OF PRESENTATION Accounting Policies: Revenues and expenditures in the schedules are presented in accordance with the modified accrual basis of accounting and are generally in agreement with revenues and expenditures reported in the City’s 2024 fund financial statements. Such expenditures are recognized following the cost principles contained in the Uniform Guidance and the State Single Audit Guidelines, wherein certain types of expenditures are not allowable or are limited as to reimbursement. De Minimis Rate Used: N Rate Explanation: The City has not elected to charge a de minimis rate of 10% of modified total costs. The accompanying Schedules of Expenditures of Federal and State Awards for the City is presented in accordance with the requirements of Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance) and the State Single Audit Guidelines issued by the Wisconsin Department of Administrations. The Schedules of Expenditures of Federal and State Awards includes all federal and state awards of the City. Because the schedule presents only a selected portion of the operations of the City, it is not intended to and does not present the financial position, changes in net position, or cash flows of the City.
Title: NOTE 3 OVERSIGHT AGENCIES Accounting Policies: Revenues and expenditures in the schedules are presented in accordance with the modified accrual basis of accounting and are generally in agreement with revenues and expenditures reported in the City’s 2024 fund financial statements. Such expenditures are recognized following the cost principles contained in the Uniform Guidance and the State Single Audit Guidelines, wherein certain types of expenditures are not allowable or are limited as to reimbursement. De Minimis Rate Used: N Rate Explanation: The City has not elected to charge a de minimis rate of 10% of modified total costs. The federal and state oversight agencies for the City are as follows: Federal – U.S. Department of the Treasury State – Wisconsin Department of Transportation

Finding Details

ARPA – Suspension & Debarment Federal Agency: U.S. Department of the Treasury Federal Program Name: Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds Assistance Listing Number: 21.027 Pass-Through Agency: N/A Pass-Through Number(s): N/A Award Period: March 3, 2021 – December 31, 2026 Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance Compliance Requirement: Procurement, Suspension & Debarment Criteria: Non-federal entities are prohibited from contracting with or making subawards under covered transactions to parties that are suspended or debarred. “Covered transactions” include contracts for goods and services awarded under a non-procurement transaction (e.g., grant or cooperative agreement) that are expected to equal or exceed $25,000 or meet certain other criteria as specified in 2 CFR section 180.220. Condition: The City entered into a procurement transaction that exceeded the covered threshold and did not perform a search for suspension and debarment prior to approving the procurement transaction in accordance with 2 CFR section 180.220. The City subsequently performed a search and the vendor was not suspended or disbarred. Questioned Costs: None Context: The City did not perform a search for the two procurement transactions that exceeded the covered transaction threshold. Cause: The City did not have procedures implemented to ensure that the vendor was not suspended or debarred prior to entering into a procurement transaction. Instead the City was performing annual checks every fall. Effect: Certain vendors could be used that are considered suspended or debarred by the federal government resulting in noncompliance. Repeat Finding: No Recommendation: We recommend the City revise its policies and procedures to ensure that documentation related to suspension and debarment be presented with the procurement action prior to approval. Views of Responsible Officials: Refer to the management response per the corrective action plan.
ARPA – Suspension & Debarment Federal Agency: U.S. Department of the Treasury Federal Program Name: Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds Assistance Listing Number: 21.027 Pass-Through Agency: N/A Pass-Through Number(s): N/A Award Period: March 3, 2021 – December 31, 2026 Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance Compliance Requirement: Procurement, Suspension & Debarment Criteria: Non-federal entities are prohibited from contracting with or making subawards under covered transactions to parties that are suspended or debarred. “Covered transactions” include contracts for goods and services awarded under a non-procurement transaction (e.g., grant or cooperative agreement) that are expected to equal or exceed $25,000 or meet certain other criteria as specified in 2 CFR section 180.220. Condition: The City entered into a procurement transaction that exceeded the covered threshold and did not perform a search for suspension and debarment prior to approving the procurement transaction in accordance with 2 CFR section 180.220. The City subsequently performed a search and the vendor was not suspended or disbarred. Questioned Costs: None Context: The City did not perform a search for the two procurement transactions that exceeded the covered transaction threshold. Cause: The City did not have procedures implemented to ensure that the vendor was not suspended or debarred prior to entering into a procurement transaction. Instead the City was performing annual checks every fall. Effect: Certain vendors could be used that are considered suspended or debarred by the federal government resulting in noncompliance. Repeat Finding: No Recommendation: We recommend the City revise its policies and procedures to ensure that documentation related to suspension and debarment be presented with the procurement action prior to approval. Views of Responsible Officials: Refer to the management response per the corrective action plan.
ARPA – Suspension & Debarment Federal Agency: U.S. Department of the Treasury Federal Program Name: Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds Assistance Listing Number: 21.027 Pass-Through Agency: N/A Pass-Through Number(s): N/A Award Period: March 3, 2021 – December 31, 2026 Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance Compliance Requirement: Procurement, Suspension & Debarment Criteria: Non-federal entities are prohibited from contracting with or making subawards under covered transactions to parties that are suspended or debarred. “Covered transactions” include contracts for goods and services awarded under a non-procurement transaction (e.g., grant or cooperative agreement) that are expected to equal or exceed $25,000 or meet certain other criteria as specified in 2 CFR section 180.220. Condition: The City entered into a procurement transaction that exceeded the covered threshold and did not perform a search for suspension and debarment prior to approving the procurement transaction in accordance with 2 CFR section 180.220. The City subsequently performed a search and the vendor was not suspended or disbarred. Questioned Costs: None Context: The City did not perform a search for the two procurement transactions that exceeded the covered transaction threshold. Cause: The City did not have procedures implemented to ensure that the vendor was not suspended or debarred prior to entering into a procurement transaction. Instead the City was performing annual checks every fall. Effect: Certain vendors could be used that are considered suspended or debarred by the federal government resulting in noncompliance. Repeat Finding: No Recommendation: We recommend the City revise its policies and procedures to ensure that documentation related to suspension and debarment be presented with the procurement action prior to approval. Views of Responsible Officials: Refer to the management response per the corrective action plan.
ARPA – Suspension & Debarment Federal Agency: U.S. Department of the Treasury Federal Program Name: Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds Assistance Listing Number: 21.027 Pass-Through Agency: N/A Pass-Through Number(s): N/A Award Period: March 3, 2021 – December 31, 2026 Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance Compliance Requirement: Procurement, Suspension & Debarment Criteria: Non-federal entities are prohibited from contracting with or making subawards under covered transactions to parties that are suspended or debarred. “Covered transactions” include contracts for goods and services awarded under a non-procurement transaction (e.g., grant or cooperative agreement) that are expected to equal or exceed $25,000 or meet certain other criteria as specified in 2 CFR section 180.220. Condition: The City entered into a procurement transaction that exceeded the covered threshold and did not perform a search for suspension and debarment prior to approving the procurement transaction in accordance with 2 CFR section 180.220. The City subsequently performed a search and the vendor was not suspended or disbarred. Questioned Costs: None Context: The City did not perform a search for the two procurement transactions that exceeded the covered transaction threshold. Cause: The City did not have procedures implemented to ensure that the vendor was not suspended or debarred prior to entering into a procurement transaction. Instead the City was performing annual checks every fall. Effect: Certain vendors could be used that are considered suspended or debarred by the federal government resulting in noncompliance. Repeat Finding: No Recommendation: We recommend the City revise its policies and procedures to ensure that documentation related to suspension and debarment be presented with the procurement action prior to approval. Views of Responsible Officials: Refer to the management response per the corrective action plan.