Audit 361935

FY End
2024-12-31
Total Expended
$2.10M
Findings
28
Programs
3
Year: 2024 Accepted: 2025-07-10

Organization Exclusion Status:

Checking exclusion status...

Findings

ID Ref Severity Repeat Requirement
570989 2024-001 Significant Deficiency Yes P
570990 2024-001 Significant Deficiency Yes P
570991 2024-001 Significant Deficiency Yes P
570992 2024-001 Significant Deficiency Yes P
570993 2024-001 Significant Deficiency Yes P
570994 2024-001 Significant Deficiency Yes P
570995 2024-001 Significant Deficiency Yes P
570996 2024-002 Significant Deficiency - P
570997 2024-002 Significant Deficiency - P
570998 2024-002 Significant Deficiency - P
570999 2024-002 Significant Deficiency - P
571000 2024-002 Significant Deficiency - P
571001 2024-002 Significant Deficiency - P
571002 2024-002 Significant Deficiency - P
1147431 2024-001 Significant Deficiency Yes P
1147432 2024-001 Significant Deficiency Yes P
1147433 2024-001 Significant Deficiency Yes P
1147434 2024-001 Significant Deficiency Yes P
1147435 2024-001 Significant Deficiency Yes P
1147436 2024-001 Significant Deficiency Yes P
1147437 2024-001 Significant Deficiency Yes P
1147438 2024-002 Significant Deficiency - P
1147439 2024-002 Significant Deficiency - P
1147440 2024-002 Significant Deficiency - P
1147441 2024-002 Significant Deficiency - P
1147442 2024-002 Significant Deficiency - P
1147443 2024-002 Significant Deficiency - P
1147444 2024-002 Significant Deficiency - P

Contacts

Name Title Type
Y81FEL5NKLA5 Cary Calhoun Auditee
5012780530 Brandon Sherman Auditor
No contacts on file

Notes to SEFA

Title: Note 2 - RECONCILIATION OF FEDERAL GRANT REVENUE AND EXPENDITURES Accounting Policies: a. General The accompanying Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards presents the activity of all federal awards of Baptist Community Health Services, Inc. (BCHS). BCHS’s reporting entity is defined in Note 1 to the financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2024. All federal awards received directly from federal agencies are included on the schedule, as well as federal awards passed through other government agencies. b. Basis of Accounting The accompanying Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards is presented using the accrual basis of accounting, which is described in Note 2b to BCHS’s financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2024. BCHS has elected to use the de minimus indirect cost rate, 10% for the period from January 1, 2024 through September 30, 2024 and 15% for the period from October 1, 2024 through December 31, 2024, as allowed under Uniform Guidance. For the year ended December 31, 2024, no indirect costs were included in Expenditures of Federal Awards. De Minimis Rate Used: Y Rate Explanation: For the year ended December 31, 2024, no indirect costs were included in Expenditures of Federal Awards. Unobligated balance of funds (receivable), beginning of year $304,428 Federal grant revenue received or accrued in current year 2,928,686 Total federal funds authorized 3,233,114 Less qualified expenditures (2,097,763) Unobligated balance of funds (receivable), end of year $1,135,351

Finding Details

Criteria - The internal control structure should be designed to contain the following: 1. Segregation of duties to provide reasonable assurance that all transactions are being properly approved. 2. All accounts are reconciled in a timely manner, and account reconciliations are reviewed. 3. Timely preparation of internal financial statements and other financial information to ensure those in charge of governance can make financial decisions based upon current financial data. 2024-001 Internal Control Structure (Continued) Condition - BCHS’s internal control structure presently is not operating effectively in certain phases including, the summary of checks received is not being compared to the bank deposit slip, reconciliations of accounts receivable balances to the general ledger total are not performed in all instances, the monthly accounts receivable balances are not reviewed and approved by a member of management, reconciliations are not presently reviewed by a member of management, credit card statements of the key employees are not reviewed by another member of management, and in several instances, transactions on credit card statements were not supported by receipts. Cause - Due to the size of the accounting staff implementation of procedures related to reconciliations, approval and posting of transactions was not considered practicable. Effect - The lack of adequate internal controls relating to approval of transactions and account reconciliations could result in the financial statements being misstated. Context - Systematic. Recommendation - We recommend BCHS implement adequate compensating internal controls relating to transaction approval and account reconciliation which provide for approval of all transactions and reconciliation of all accounts on a monthly basis.
Criteria - The internal control structure should be designed to contain the following: 1. Segregation of duties to provide reasonable assurance that all transactions are being properly approved. 2. All accounts are reconciled in a timely manner, and account reconciliations are reviewed. 3. Timely preparation of internal financial statements and other financial information to ensure those in charge of governance can make financial decisions based upon current financial data. 2024-001 Internal Control Structure (Continued) Condition - BCHS’s internal control structure presently is not operating effectively in certain phases including, the summary of checks received is not being compared to the bank deposit slip, reconciliations of accounts receivable balances to the general ledger total are not performed in all instances, the monthly accounts receivable balances are not reviewed and approved by a member of management, reconciliations are not presently reviewed by a member of management, credit card statements of the key employees are not reviewed by another member of management, and in several instances, transactions on credit card statements were not supported by receipts. Cause - Due to the size of the accounting staff implementation of procedures related to reconciliations, approval and posting of transactions was not considered practicable. Effect - The lack of adequate internal controls relating to approval of transactions and account reconciliations could result in the financial statements being misstated. Context - Systematic. Recommendation - We recommend BCHS implement adequate compensating internal controls relating to transaction approval and account reconciliation which provide for approval of all transactions and reconciliation of all accounts on a monthly basis.
Criteria - The internal control structure should be designed to contain the following: 1. Segregation of duties to provide reasonable assurance that all transactions are being properly approved. 2. All accounts are reconciled in a timely manner, and account reconciliations are reviewed. 3. Timely preparation of internal financial statements and other financial information to ensure those in charge of governance can make financial decisions based upon current financial data. 2024-001 Internal Control Structure (Continued) Condition - BCHS’s internal control structure presently is not operating effectively in certain phases including, the summary of checks received is not being compared to the bank deposit slip, reconciliations of accounts receivable balances to the general ledger total are not performed in all instances, the monthly accounts receivable balances are not reviewed and approved by a member of management, reconciliations are not presently reviewed by a member of management, credit card statements of the key employees are not reviewed by another member of management, and in several instances, transactions on credit card statements were not supported by receipts. Cause - Due to the size of the accounting staff implementation of procedures related to reconciliations, approval and posting of transactions was not considered practicable. Effect - The lack of adequate internal controls relating to approval of transactions and account reconciliations could result in the financial statements being misstated. Context - Systematic. Recommendation - We recommend BCHS implement adequate compensating internal controls relating to transaction approval and account reconciliation which provide for approval of all transactions and reconciliation of all accounts on a monthly basis.
Criteria - The internal control structure should be designed to contain the following: 1. Segregation of duties to provide reasonable assurance that all transactions are being properly approved. 2. All accounts are reconciled in a timely manner, and account reconciliations are reviewed. 3. Timely preparation of internal financial statements and other financial information to ensure those in charge of governance can make financial decisions based upon current financial data. 2024-001 Internal Control Structure (Continued) Condition - BCHS’s internal control structure presently is not operating effectively in certain phases including, the summary of checks received is not being compared to the bank deposit slip, reconciliations of accounts receivable balances to the general ledger total are not performed in all instances, the monthly accounts receivable balances are not reviewed and approved by a member of management, reconciliations are not presently reviewed by a member of management, credit card statements of the key employees are not reviewed by another member of management, and in several instances, transactions on credit card statements were not supported by receipts. Cause - Due to the size of the accounting staff implementation of procedures related to reconciliations, approval and posting of transactions was not considered practicable. Effect - The lack of adequate internal controls relating to approval of transactions and account reconciliations could result in the financial statements being misstated. Context - Systematic. Recommendation - We recommend BCHS implement adequate compensating internal controls relating to transaction approval and account reconciliation which provide for approval of all transactions and reconciliation of all accounts on a monthly basis.
Criteria - The internal control structure should be designed to contain the following: 1. Segregation of duties to provide reasonable assurance that all transactions are being properly approved. 2. All accounts are reconciled in a timely manner, and account reconciliations are reviewed. 3. Timely preparation of internal financial statements and other financial information to ensure those in charge of governance can make financial decisions based upon current financial data. 2024-001 Internal Control Structure (Continued) Condition - BCHS’s internal control structure presently is not operating effectively in certain phases including, the summary of checks received is not being compared to the bank deposit slip, reconciliations of accounts receivable balances to the general ledger total are not performed in all instances, the monthly accounts receivable balances are not reviewed and approved by a member of management, reconciliations are not presently reviewed by a member of management, credit card statements of the key employees are not reviewed by another member of management, and in several instances, transactions on credit card statements were not supported by receipts. Cause - Due to the size of the accounting staff implementation of procedures related to reconciliations, approval and posting of transactions was not considered practicable. Effect - The lack of adequate internal controls relating to approval of transactions and account reconciliations could result in the financial statements being misstated. Context - Systematic. Recommendation - We recommend BCHS implement adequate compensating internal controls relating to transaction approval and account reconciliation which provide for approval of all transactions and reconciliation of all accounts on a monthly basis.
Criteria - The internal control structure should be designed to contain the following: 1. Segregation of duties to provide reasonable assurance that all transactions are being properly approved. 2. All accounts are reconciled in a timely manner, and account reconciliations are reviewed. 3. Timely preparation of internal financial statements and other financial information to ensure those in charge of governance can make financial decisions based upon current financial data. 2024-001 Internal Control Structure (Continued) Condition - BCHS’s internal control structure presently is not operating effectively in certain phases including, the summary of checks received is not being compared to the bank deposit slip, reconciliations of accounts receivable balances to the general ledger total are not performed in all instances, the monthly accounts receivable balances are not reviewed and approved by a member of management, reconciliations are not presently reviewed by a member of management, credit card statements of the key employees are not reviewed by another member of management, and in several instances, transactions on credit card statements were not supported by receipts. Cause - Due to the size of the accounting staff implementation of procedures related to reconciliations, approval and posting of transactions was not considered practicable. Effect - The lack of adequate internal controls relating to approval of transactions and account reconciliations could result in the financial statements being misstated. Context - Systematic. Recommendation - We recommend BCHS implement adequate compensating internal controls relating to transaction approval and account reconciliation which provide for approval of all transactions and reconciliation of all accounts on a monthly basis.
Criteria - The internal control structure should be designed to contain the following: 1. Segregation of duties to provide reasonable assurance that all transactions are being properly approved. 2. All accounts are reconciled in a timely manner, and account reconciliations are reviewed. 3. Timely preparation of internal financial statements and other financial information to ensure those in charge of governance can make financial decisions based upon current financial data. 2024-001 Internal Control Structure (Continued) Condition - BCHS’s internal control structure presently is not operating effectively in certain phases including, the summary of checks received is not being compared to the bank deposit slip, reconciliations of accounts receivable balances to the general ledger total are not performed in all instances, the monthly accounts receivable balances are not reviewed and approved by a member of management, reconciliations are not presently reviewed by a member of management, credit card statements of the key employees are not reviewed by another member of management, and in several instances, transactions on credit card statements were not supported by receipts. Cause - Due to the size of the accounting staff implementation of procedures related to reconciliations, approval and posting of transactions was not considered practicable. Effect - The lack of adequate internal controls relating to approval of transactions and account reconciliations could result in the financial statements being misstated. Context - Systematic. Recommendation - We recommend BCHS implement adequate compensating internal controls relating to transaction approval and account reconciliation which provide for approval of all transactions and reconciliation of all accounts on a monthly basis.
Criteria - The Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA) requires that all grant reporting be completed by specified dates based on the month end of the budget period Condition - There was no documentation that three out of five reports due during the current year were submitted within the required timeframe. The reports were not accepted until after the required reporting timeframe, and the report acceptance date is the only support maintained by BCHS. Cause - The reports were initially rejected and required modification before their final acceptance Effect - BCHS was not in compliance with Federal Financial Reporting requirements. Context - Systematic. Recommendation - We recommend BCHS submit form SF-425 for all grants in compliance with Federal Financial Reporting requirements.
Criteria - The Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA) requires that all grant reporting be completed by specified dates based on the month end of the budget period Condition - There was no documentation that three out of five reports due during the current year were submitted within the required timeframe. The reports were not accepted until after the required reporting timeframe, and the report acceptance date is the only support maintained by BCHS. Cause - The reports were initially rejected and required modification before their final acceptance Effect - BCHS was not in compliance with Federal Financial Reporting requirements. Context - Systematic. Recommendation - We recommend BCHS submit form SF-425 for all grants in compliance with Federal Financial Reporting requirements.
Criteria - The Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA) requires that all grant reporting be completed by specified dates based on the month end of the budget period Condition - There was no documentation that three out of five reports due during the current year were submitted within the required timeframe. The reports were not accepted until after the required reporting timeframe, and the report acceptance date is the only support maintained by BCHS. Cause - The reports were initially rejected and required modification before their final acceptance Effect - BCHS was not in compliance with Federal Financial Reporting requirements. Context - Systematic. Recommendation - We recommend BCHS submit form SF-425 for all grants in compliance with Federal Financial Reporting requirements.
Criteria - The Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA) requires that all grant reporting be completed by specified dates based on the month end of the budget period Condition - There was no documentation that three out of five reports due during the current year were submitted within the required timeframe. The reports were not accepted until after the required reporting timeframe, and the report acceptance date is the only support maintained by BCHS. Cause - The reports were initially rejected and required modification before their final acceptance Effect - BCHS was not in compliance with Federal Financial Reporting requirements. Context - Systematic. Recommendation - We recommend BCHS submit form SF-425 for all grants in compliance with Federal Financial Reporting requirements.
Criteria - The Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA) requires that all grant reporting be completed by specified dates based on the month end of the budget period Condition - There was no documentation that three out of five reports due during the current year were submitted within the required timeframe. The reports were not accepted until after the required reporting timeframe, and the report acceptance date is the only support maintained by BCHS. Cause - The reports were initially rejected and required modification before their final acceptance Effect - BCHS was not in compliance with Federal Financial Reporting requirements. Context - Systematic. Recommendation - We recommend BCHS submit form SF-425 for all grants in compliance with Federal Financial Reporting requirements.
Criteria - The Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA) requires that all grant reporting be completed by specified dates based on the month end of the budget period Condition - There was no documentation that three out of five reports due during the current year were submitted within the required timeframe. The reports were not accepted until after the required reporting timeframe, and the report acceptance date is the only support maintained by BCHS. Cause - The reports were initially rejected and required modification before their final acceptance Effect - BCHS was not in compliance with Federal Financial Reporting requirements. Context - Systematic. Recommendation - We recommend BCHS submit form SF-425 for all grants in compliance with Federal Financial Reporting requirements.
Criteria - The Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA) requires that all grant reporting be completed by specified dates based on the month end of the budget period Condition - There was no documentation that three out of five reports due during the current year were submitted within the required timeframe. The reports were not accepted until after the required reporting timeframe, and the report acceptance date is the only support maintained by BCHS. Cause - The reports were initially rejected and required modification before their final acceptance Effect - BCHS was not in compliance with Federal Financial Reporting requirements. Context - Systematic. Recommendation - We recommend BCHS submit form SF-425 for all grants in compliance with Federal Financial Reporting requirements.
Criteria - The internal control structure should be designed to contain the following: 1. Segregation of duties to provide reasonable assurance that all transactions are being properly approved. 2. All accounts are reconciled in a timely manner, and account reconciliations are reviewed. 3. Timely preparation of internal financial statements and other financial information to ensure those in charge of governance can make financial decisions based upon current financial data. 2024-001 Internal Control Structure (Continued) Condition - BCHS’s internal control structure presently is not operating effectively in certain phases including, the summary of checks received is not being compared to the bank deposit slip, reconciliations of accounts receivable balances to the general ledger total are not performed in all instances, the monthly accounts receivable balances are not reviewed and approved by a member of management, reconciliations are not presently reviewed by a member of management, credit card statements of the key employees are not reviewed by another member of management, and in several instances, transactions on credit card statements were not supported by receipts. Cause - Due to the size of the accounting staff implementation of procedures related to reconciliations, approval and posting of transactions was not considered practicable. Effect - The lack of adequate internal controls relating to approval of transactions and account reconciliations could result in the financial statements being misstated. Context - Systematic. Recommendation - We recommend BCHS implement adequate compensating internal controls relating to transaction approval and account reconciliation which provide for approval of all transactions and reconciliation of all accounts on a monthly basis.
Criteria - The internal control structure should be designed to contain the following: 1. Segregation of duties to provide reasonable assurance that all transactions are being properly approved. 2. All accounts are reconciled in a timely manner, and account reconciliations are reviewed. 3. Timely preparation of internal financial statements and other financial information to ensure those in charge of governance can make financial decisions based upon current financial data. 2024-001 Internal Control Structure (Continued) Condition - BCHS’s internal control structure presently is not operating effectively in certain phases including, the summary of checks received is not being compared to the bank deposit slip, reconciliations of accounts receivable balances to the general ledger total are not performed in all instances, the monthly accounts receivable balances are not reviewed and approved by a member of management, reconciliations are not presently reviewed by a member of management, credit card statements of the key employees are not reviewed by another member of management, and in several instances, transactions on credit card statements were not supported by receipts. Cause - Due to the size of the accounting staff implementation of procedures related to reconciliations, approval and posting of transactions was not considered practicable. Effect - The lack of adequate internal controls relating to approval of transactions and account reconciliations could result in the financial statements being misstated. Context - Systematic. Recommendation - We recommend BCHS implement adequate compensating internal controls relating to transaction approval and account reconciliation which provide for approval of all transactions and reconciliation of all accounts on a monthly basis.
Criteria - The internal control structure should be designed to contain the following: 1. Segregation of duties to provide reasonable assurance that all transactions are being properly approved. 2. All accounts are reconciled in a timely manner, and account reconciliations are reviewed. 3. Timely preparation of internal financial statements and other financial information to ensure those in charge of governance can make financial decisions based upon current financial data. 2024-001 Internal Control Structure (Continued) Condition - BCHS’s internal control structure presently is not operating effectively in certain phases including, the summary of checks received is not being compared to the bank deposit slip, reconciliations of accounts receivable balances to the general ledger total are not performed in all instances, the monthly accounts receivable balances are not reviewed and approved by a member of management, reconciliations are not presently reviewed by a member of management, credit card statements of the key employees are not reviewed by another member of management, and in several instances, transactions on credit card statements were not supported by receipts. Cause - Due to the size of the accounting staff implementation of procedures related to reconciliations, approval and posting of transactions was not considered practicable. Effect - The lack of adequate internal controls relating to approval of transactions and account reconciliations could result in the financial statements being misstated. Context - Systematic. Recommendation - We recommend BCHS implement adequate compensating internal controls relating to transaction approval and account reconciliation which provide for approval of all transactions and reconciliation of all accounts on a monthly basis.
Criteria - The internal control structure should be designed to contain the following: 1. Segregation of duties to provide reasonable assurance that all transactions are being properly approved. 2. All accounts are reconciled in a timely manner, and account reconciliations are reviewed. 3. Timely preparation of internal financial statements and other financial information to ensure those in charge of governance can make financial decisions based upon current financial data. 2024-001 Internal Control Structure (Continued) Condition - BCHS’s internal control structure presently is not operating effectively in certain phases including, the summary of checks received is not being compared to the bank deposit slip, reconciliations of accounts receivable balances to the general ledger total are not performed in all instances, the monthly accounts receivable balances are not reviewed and approved by a member of management, reconciliations are not presently reviewed by a member of management, credit card statements of the key employees are not reviewed by another member of management, and in several instances, transactions on credit card statements were not supported by receipts. Cause - Due to the size of the accounting staff implementation of procedures related to reconciliations, approval and posting of transactions was not considered practicable. Effect - The lack of adequate internal controls relating to approval of transactions and account reconciliations could result in the financial statements being misstated. Context - Systematic. Recommendation - We recommend BCHS implement adequate compensating internal controls relating to transaction approval and account reconciliation which provide for approval of all transactions and reconciliation of all accounts on a monthly basis.
Criteria - The internal control structure should be designed to contain the following: 1. Segregation of duties to provide reasonable assurance that all transactions are being properly approved. 2. All accounts are reconciled in a timely manner, and account reconciliations are reviewed. 3. Timely preparation of internal financial statements and other financial information to ensure those in charge of governance can make financial decisions based upon current financial data. 2024-001 Internal Control Structure (Continued) Condition - BCHS’s internal control structure presently is not operating effectively in certain phases including, the summary of checks received is not being compared to the bank deposit slip, reconciliations of accounts receivable balances to the general ledger total are not performed in all instances, the monthly accounts receivable balances are not reviewed and approved by a member of management, reconciliations are not presently reviewed by a member of management, credit card statements of the key employees are not reviewed by another member of management, and in several instances, transactions on credit card statements were not supported by receipts. Cause - Due to the size of the accounting staff implementation of procedures related to reconciliations, approval and posting of transactions was not considered practicable. Effect - The lack of adequate internal controls relating to approval of transactions and account reconciliations could result in the financial statements being misstated. Context - Systematic. Recommendation - We recommend BCHS implement adequate compensating internal controls relating to transaction approval and account reconciliation which provide for approval of all transactions and reconciliation of all accounts on a monthly basis.
Criteria - The internal control structure should be designed to contain the following: 1. Segregation of duties to provide reasonable assurance that all transactions are being properly approved. 2. All accounts are reconciled in a timely manner, and account reconciliations are reviewed. 3. Timely preparation of internal financial statements and other financial information to ensure those in charge of governance can make financial decisions based upon current financial data. 2024-001 Internal Control Structure (Continued) Condition - BCHS’s internal control structure presently is not operating effectively in certain phases including, the summary of checks received is not being compared to the bank deposit slip, reconciliations of accounts receivable balances to the general ledger total are not performed in all instances, the monthly accounts receivable balances are not reviewed and approved by a member of management, reconciliations are not presently reviewed by a member of management, credit card statements of the key employees are not reviewed by another member of management, and in several instances, transactions on credit card statements were not supported by receipts. Cause - Due to the size of the accounting staff implementation of procedures related to reconciliations, approval and posting of transactions was not considered practicable. Effect - The lack of adequate internal controls relating to approval of transactions and account reconciliations could result in the financial statements being misstated. Context - Systematic. Recommendation - We recommend BCHS implement adequate compensating internal controls relating to transaction approval and account reconciliation which provide for approval of all transactions and reconciliation of all accounts on a monthly basis.
Criteria - The internal control structure should be designed to contain the following: 1. Segregation of duties to provide reasonable assurance that all transactions are being properly approved. 2. All accounts are reconciled in a timely manner, and account reconciliations are reviewed. 3. Timely preparation of internal financial statements and other financial information to ensure those in charge of governance can make financial decisions based upon current financial data. 2024-001 Internal Control Structure (Continued) Condition - BCHS’s internal control structure presently is not operating effectively in certain phases including, the summary of checks received is not being compared to the bank deposit slip, reconciliations of accounts receivable balances to the general ledger total are not performed in all instances, the monthly accounts receivable balances are not reviewed and approved by a member of management, reconciliations are not presently reviewed by a member of management, credit card statements of the key employees are not reviewed by another member of management, and in several instances, transactions on credit card statements were not supported by receipts. Cause - Due to the size of the accounting staff implementation of procedures related to reconciliations, approval and posting of transactions was not considered practicable. Effect - The lack of adequate internal controls relating to approval of transactions and account reconciliations could result in the financial statements being misstated. Context - Systematic. Recommendation - We recommend BCHS implement adequate compensating internal controls relating to transaction approval and account reconciliation which provide for approval of all transactions and reconciliation of all accounts on a monthly basis.
Criteria - The Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA) requires that all grant reporting be completed by specified dates based on the month end of the budget period Condition - There was no documentation that three out of five reports due during the current year were submitted within the required timeframe. The reports were not accepted until after the required reporting timeframe, and the report acceptance date is the only support maintained by BCHS. Cause - The reports were initially rejected and required modification before their final acceptance Effect - BCHS was not in compliance with Federal Financial Reporting requirements. Context - Systematic. Recommendation - We recommend BCHS submit form SF-425 for all grants in compliance with Federal Financial Reporting requirements.
Criteria - The Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA) requires that all grant reporting be completed by specified dates based on the month end of the budget period Condition - There was no documentation that three out of five reports due during the current year were submitted within the required timeframe. The reports were not accepted until after the required reporting timeframe, and the report acceptance date is the only support maintained by BCHS. Cause - The reports were initially rejected and required modification before their final acceptance Effect - BCHS was not in compliance with Federal Financial Reporting requirements. Context - Systematic. Recommendation - We recommend BCHS submit form SF-425 for all grants in compliance with Federal Financial Reporting requirements.
Criteria - The Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA) requires that all grant reporting be completed by specified dates based on the month end of the budget period Condition - There was no documentation that three out of five reports due during the current year were submitted within the required timeframe. The reports were not accepted until after the required reporting timeframe, and the report acceptance date is the only support maintained by BCHS. Cause - The reports were initially rejected and required modification before their final acceptance Effect - BCHS was not in compliance with Federal Financial Reporting requirements. Context - Systematic. Recommendation - We recommend BCHS submit form SF-425 for all grants in compliance with Federal Financial Reporting requirements.
Criteria - The Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA) requires that all grant reporting be completed by specified dates based on the month end of the budget period Condition - There was no documentation that three out of five reports due during the current year were submitted within the required timeframe. The reports were not accepted until after the required reporting timeframe, and the report acceptance date is the only support maintained by BCHS. Cause - The reports were initially rejected and required modification before their final acceptance Effect - BCHS was not in compliance with Federal Financial Reporting requirements. Context - Systematic. Recommendation - We recommend BCHS submit form SF-425 for all grants in compliance with Federal Financial Reporting requirements.
Criteria - The Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA) requires that all grant reporting be completed by specified dates based on the month end of the budget period Condition - There was no documentation that three out of five reports due during the current year were submitted within the required timeframe. The reports were not accepted until after the required reporting timeframe, and the report acceptance date is the only support maintained by BCHS. Cause - The reports were initially rejected and required modification before their final acceptance Effect - BCHS was not in compliance with Federal Financial Reporting requirements. Context - Systematic. Recommendation - We recommend BCHS submit form SF-425 for all grants in compliance with Federal Financial Reporting requirements.
Criteria - The Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA) requires that all grant reporting be completed by specified dates based on the month end of the budget period Condition - There was no documentation that three out of five reports due during the current year were submitted within the required timeframe. The reports were not accepted until after the required reporting timeframe, and the report acceptance date is the only support maintained by BCHS. Cause - The reports were initially rejected and required modification before their final acceptance Effect - BCHS was not in compliance with Federal Financial Reporting requirements. Context - Systematic. Recommendation - We recommend BCHS submit form SF-425 for all grants in compliance with Federal Financial Reporting requirements.
Criteria - The Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA) requires that all grant reporting be completed by specified dates based on the month end of the budget period Condition - There was no documentation that three out of five reports due during the current year were submitted within the required timeframe. The reports were not accepted until after the required reporting timeframe, and the report acceptance date is the only support maintained by BCHS. Cause - The reports were initially rejected and required modification before their final acceptance Effect - BCHS was not in compliance with Federal Financial Reporting requirements. Context - Systematic. Recommendation - We recommend BCHS submit form SF-425 for all grants in compliance with Federal Financial Reporting requirements.