Audit 35893

FY End
2022-06-30
Total Expended
$67.67M
Findings
32
Programs
23
Year: 2022 Accepted: 2023-01-02
Auditor: Rsm US LLP

Organization Exclusion Status:

Checking exclusion status...

Findings

ID Ref Severity Repeat Requirement
38173 2022-003 Material Weakness - N
38174 2022-002 Significant Deficiency - N
38175 2022-002 Significant Deficiency - N
38176 2022-002 Significant Deficiency - N
38177 2022-002 Significant Deficiency - N
38178 2022-002 Significant Deficiency - N
38179 2022-002 Significant Deficiency - N
38180 2022-002 Significant Deficiency - N
38181 2022-002 Significant Deficiency - N
38182 2022-003 Material Weakness - N
38183 2022-003 Material Weakness - N
38184 2022-003 Material Weakness - N
38185 2022-003 Material Weakness - N
38186 2022-003 Material Weakness - N
38187 2022-003 Material Weakness - N
38188 2022-003 Material Weakness - N
614615 2022-003 Material Weakness - N
614616 2022-002 Significant Deficiency - N
614617 2022-002 Significant Deficiency - N
614618 2022-002 Significant Deficiency - N
614619 2022-002 Significant Deficiency - N
614620 2022-002 Significant Deficiency - N
614621 2022-002 Significant Deficiency - N
614622 2022-002 Significant Deficiency - N
614623 2022-002 Significant Deficiency - N
614624 2022-003 Material Weakness - N
614625 2022-003 Material Weakness - N
614626 2022-003 Material Weakness - N
614627 2022-003 Material Weakness - N
614628 2022-003 Material Weakness - N
614629 2022-003 Material Weakness - N
614630 2022-003 Material Weakness - N

Contacts

Name Title Type
HGM6RN7EW395 Elaine Morgan Auditee
8164187839 Kristen Hughes Auditor
No contacts on file

Notes to SEFA

Title: Basis of Presentation Accounting Policies: Revenue from federal awards is recognized when Kansas City Public Schools has done everything necessary to establish its right to revenue. For governmental funds, revenue from federal grants is recognized when they become both measurable and available. Expenditures of federal awards are recognized in the accounting period in which the liability is incurred. Such expenditures are recognized following the cost principles contained in OMB Circular A87, Cost Principles for State, Local and Indian Tribal Governments, or the cost principles contained in Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200,UniformAdministrative Requirements, Cost Principles and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards, wherein certain types of expenditures are not allowed or are limited as to reimbursement. De Minimis Rate Used: N Rate Explanation: The auditee did not use the de minimis cost rate. The accompanying schedule of expenditures of federal awards includes the federal grant activity of Kansas City Public Schools and is presented on the modified accrual basis of accounting. The information in this schedule is presented in accordance with the requirements of the Uniform Guidance. Therefore, some amounts presented in this schedule may differ from amounts presented in, or used in the preparation of, the basic financial statements.
Title: Subrecipients Accounting Policies: Revenue from federal awards is recognized when Kansas City Public Schools has done everything necessary to establish its right to revenue. For governmental funds, revenue from federal grants is recognized when they become both measurable and available. Expenditures of federal awards are recognized in the accounting period in which the liability is incurred. Such expenditures are recognized following the cost principles contained in OMB Circular A87, Cost Principles for State, Local and Indian Tribal Governments, or the cost principles contained in Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200,UniformAdministrative Requirements, Cost Principles and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards, wherein certain types of expenditures are not allowed or are limited as to reimbursement. De Minimis Rate Used: N Rate Explanation: The auditee did not use the de minimis cost rate. There were no federal awards passed through to subrecipients for the year ended June 30, 2022.
Title: Noncash Assistance Accounting Policies: Revenue from federal awards is recognized when Kansas City Public Schools has done everything necessary to establish its right to revenue. For governmental funds, revenue from federal grants is recognized when they become both measurable and available. Expenditures of federal awards are recognized in the accounting period in which the liability is incurred. Such expenditures are recognized following the cost principles contained in OMB Circular A87, Cost Principles for State, Local and Indian Tribal Governments, or the cost principles contained in Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200,UniformAdministrative Requirements, Cost Principles and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards, wherein certain types of expenditures are not allowed or are limited as to reimbursement. De Minimis Rate Used: N Rate Explanation: The auditee did not use the de minimis cost rate. The schedule includes federal awards in the form of noncash assistance (food commodities) received during the year in the amount of $483,142 related to the U.S. Department of Agriculture passed through the Missouri Department of Elementary and Secondary Education ALN 10.555.

Finding Details

Finding 2022-003 Program: Education Stabilization Fund Section 1 Federal Agency: United States Department of Education AL #: Cluster 84.425C, 84.425D, and 84.425R Federal Award Identification Number and Year: Various ? See SEFA Pass-through Entity: Missouri Department of Elementary and Secondary Education (DESE) Type of Compliance Finding: N ? Special Tests and Provisions Criteria Per the U.S. Department of Labor, federal rules and regulations 40 USC 3141-3144, 3146, and 3147; all laborers and mechanics employed by contractors or subcontractors to work on construction contracts in excess of $2,000 financed by federal assistance funds must be paid wages not less than those established for the locality of the project (prevailing wage rates). Condition During discussion, observations, and our understanding of internal control, we observed the District followed the State of Missouri?s guidelines for construction projects, which states that public works projects valued at $75,000 and under are not subject to prevailing wage regardless of federal funding source. Two of the seven construction contracts paid with federal assistance funds that were below $75,000, but in excess of the applicable $2,000 federal threshold, did not have prevailing wage rate clauses. Cause The District did not follow federal rules and regulations regarding prevailing wage rate requirements for construction contracts in excess of $2,000 financed by federal assistance funds. Effect Laborers and mechanics employed by contractors or subcontractors for construction contracts in excess of $2,000 may not have been paid prevailing wage rates established for the locality of the project. Questioned costs $13,420 Is the finding a repeat finding No Recommendation We recommend the District establish a process to ensure that prevailing wage rate clauses are included in contracts that exceed the federal requirement for construction projects financed by federal assistance funds and documentation of certified payrolls on those contracts are obtained. Views of responsible officials/planned corrective actions Management agrees with the finding. See Corrective Action Plan on Organization?s letterhead.
Finding 2022-002 Program: Child Nutrition Cluster Federal Agency: United States Department of Agriculture AL #: Cluster 10.553, 10.555, 10.556, 10.559, and 10.582 Federal Award Identification Number and Year: Various ? See SEFA Pass-through Entity: Missouri Department of Elementary and Secondary Education (DESE) and Missouri Department of Health and Senior Services Type of Compliance Finding: N ? Special Tests and Provisions Criteria Per the U.S. Department of Agriculture, federal rules and regulations 7 CFR 210.13(b) requires that schools shall obtain a minimum of two food safety inspections during each school year conducted by a state or local government agency responsible for food safety inspections. If a violation occurs during the food safety inspection, a corrective action plan must be implemented, and violations resolved by a specified date. Condition/Context In our sample of ten schools, Kansas City Public Schools (the District) obtained the requisite two food safety inspections at each school during the school year; however, the food safety inspection reports identified critical violations at four schools, which were not corrected by a specified date. Cause The District does not have a process in place to ensure that timely corrective actions were taken for violations identified by inspections conducted by the Kansas City, Missouri Health Department (KCMO Health Department). Effect The District did not comply with food storage, preparation, and service standards established by the KCMO Health Department. Questioned costs None Is the finding a repeat finding No Recommendation We recommend the District resolve all violations identified during food safety inspections within the prescribed timeline and implement a monitoring process to ensure violations are resolved timely. Views of responsible officials/planned corrective actions Management agrees with the finding. See Corrective Action Plan on Organization?s letterhead.
Finding 2022-002 Program: Child Nutrition Cluster Federal Agency: United States Department of Agriculture AL #: Cluster 10.553, 10.555, 10.556, 10.559, and 10.582 Federal Award Identification Number and Year: Various ? See SEFA Pass-through Entity: Missouri Department of Elementary and Secondary Education (DESE) and Missouri Department of Health and Senior Services Type of Compliance Finding: N ? Special Tests and Provisions Criteria Per the U.S. Department of Agriculture, federal rules and regulations 7 CFR 210.13(b) requires that schools shall obtain a minimum of two food safety inspections during each school year conducted by a state or local government agency responsible for food safety inspections. If a violation occurs during the food safety inspection, a corrective action plan must be implemented, and violations resolved by a specified date. Condition/Context In our sample of ten schools, Kansas City Public Schools (the District) obtained the requisite two food safety inspections at each school during the school year; however, the food safety inspection reports identified critical violations at four schools, which were not corrected by a specified date. Cause The District does not have a process in place to ensure that timely corrective actions were taken for violations identified by inspections conducted by the Kansas City, Missouri Health Department (KCMO Health Department). Effect The District did not comply with food storage, preparation, and service standards established by the KCMO Health Department. Questioned costs None Is the finding a repeat finding No Recommendation We recommend the District resolve all violations identified during food safety inspections within the prescribed timeline and implement a monitoring process to ensure violations are resolved timely. Views of responsible officials/planned corrective actions Management agrees with the finding. See Corrective Action Plan on Organization?s letterhead.
Finding 2022-002 Program: Child Nutrition Cluster Federal Agency: United States Department of Agriculture AL #: Cluster 10.553, 10.555, 10.556, 10.559, and 10.582 Federal Award Identification Number and Year: Various ? See SEFA Pass-through Entity: Missouri Department of Elementary and Secondary Education (DESE) and Missouri Department of Health and Senior Services Type of Compliance Finding: N ? Special Tests and Provisions Criteria Per the U.S. Department of Agriculture, federal rules and regulations 7 CFR 210.13(b) requires that schools shall obtain a minimum of two food safety inspections during each school year conducted by a state or local government agency responsible for food safety inspections. If a violation occurs during the food safety inspection, a corrective action plan must be implemented, and violations resolved by a specified date. Condition/Context In our sample of ten schools, Kansas City Public Schools (the District) obtained the requisite two food safety inspections at each school during the school year; however, the food safety inspection reports identified critical violations at four schools, which were not corrected by a specified date. Cause The District does not have a process in place to ensure that timely corrective actions were taken for violations identified by inspections conducted by the Kansas City, Missouri Health Department (KCMO Health Department). Effect The District did not comply with food storage, preparation, and service standards established by the KCMO Health Department. Questioned costs None Is the finding a repeat finding No Recommendation We recommend the District resolve all violations identified during food safety inspections within the prescribed timeline and implement a monitoring process to ensure violations are resolved timely. Views of responsible officials/planned corrective actions Management agrees with the finding. See Corrective Action Plan on Organization?s letterhead.
Finding 2022-002 Program: Child Nutrition Cluster Federal Agency: United States Department of Agriculture AL #: Cluster 10.553, 10.555, 10.556, 10.559, and 10.582 Federal Award Identification Number and Year: Various ? See SEFA Pass-through Entity: Missouri Department of Elementary and Secondary Education (DESE) and Missouri Department of Health and Senior Services Type of Compliance Finding: N ? Special Tests and Provisions Criteria Per the U.S. Department of Agriculture, federal rules and regulations 7 CFR 210.13(b) requires that schools shall obtain a minimum of two food safety inspections during each school year conducted by a state or local government agency responsible for food safety inspections. If a violation occurs during the food safety inspection, a corrective action plan must be implemented, and violations resolved by a specified date. Condition/Context In our sample of ten schools, Kansas City Public Schools (the District) obtained the requisite two food safety inspections at each school during the school year; however, the food safety inspection reports identified critical violations at four schools, which were not corrected by a specified date. Cause The District does not have a process in place to ensure that timely corrective actions were taken for violations identified by inspections conducted by the Kansas City, Missouri Health Department (KCMO Health Department). Effect The District did not comply with food storage, preparation, and service standards established by the KCMO Health Department. Questioned costs None Is the finding a repeat finding No Recommendation We recommend the District resolve all violations identified during food safety inspections within the prescribed timeline and implement a monitoring process to ensure violations are resolved timely. Views of responsible officials/planned corrective actions Management agrees with the finding. See Corrective Action Plan on Organization?s letterhead.
Finding 2022-002 Program: Child Nutrition Cluster Federal Agency: United States Department of Agriculture AL #: Cluster 10.553, 10.555, 10.556, 10.559, and 10.582 Federal Award Identification Number and Year: Various ? See SEFA Pass-through Entity: Missouri Department of Elementary and Secondary Education (DESE) and Missouri Department of Health and Senior Services Type of Compliance Finding: N ? Special Tests and Provisions Criteria Per the U.S. Department of Agriculture, federal rules and regulations 7 CFR 210.13(b) requires that schools shall obtain a minimum of two food safety inspections during each school year conducted by a state or local government agency responsible for food safety inspections. If a violation occurs during the food safety inspection, a corrective action plan must be implemented, and violations resolved by a specified date. Condition/Context In our sample of ten schools, Kansas City Public Schools (the District) obtained the requisite two food safety inspections at each school during the school year; however, the food safety inspection reports identified critical violations at four schools, which were not corrected by a specified date. Cause The District does not have a process in place to ensure that timely corrective actions were taken for violations identified by inspections conducted by the Kansas City, Missouri Health Department (KCMO Health Department). Effect The District did not comply with food storage, preparation, and service standards established by the KCMO Health Department. Questioned costs None Is the finding a repeat finding No Recommendation We recommend the District resolve all violations identified during food safety inspections within the prescribed timeline and implement a monitoring process to ensure violations are resolved timely. Views of responsible officials/planned corrective actions Management agrees with the finding. See Corrective Action Plan on Organization?s letterhead.
Finding 2022-002 Program: Child Nutrition Cluster Federal Agency: United States Department of Agriculture AL #: Cluster 10.553, 10.555, 10.556, 10.559, and 10.582 Federal Award Identification Number and Year: Various ? See SEFA Pass-through Entity: Missouri Department of Elementary and Secondary Education (DESE) and Missouri Department of Health and Senior Services Type of Compliance Finding: N ? Special Tests and Provisions Criteria Per the U.S. Department of Agriculture, federal rules and regulations 7 CFR 210.13(b) requires that schools shall obtain a minimum of two food safety inspections during each school year conducted by a state or local government agency responsible for food safety inspections. If a violation occurs during the food safety inspection, a corrective action plan must be implemented, and violations resolved by a specified date. Condition/Context In our sample of ten schools, Kansas City Public Schools (the District) obtained the requisite two food safety inspections at each school during the school year; however, the food safety inspection reports identified critical violations at four schools, which were not corrected by a specified date. Cause The District does not have a process in place to ensure that timely corrective actions were taken for violations identified by inspections conducted by the Kansas City, Missouri Health Department (KCMO Health Department). Effect The District did not comply with food storage, preparation, and service standards established by the KCMO Health Department. Questioned costs None Is the finding a repeat finding No Recommendation We recommend the District resolve all violations identified during food safety inspections within the prescribed timeline and implement a monitoring process to ensure violations are resolved timely. Views of responsible officials/planned corrective actions Management agrees with the finding. See Corrective Action Plan on Organization?s letterhead.
Finding 2022-002 Program: Child Nutrition Cluster Federal Agency: United States Department of Agriculture AL #: Cluster 10.553, 10.555, 10.556, 10.559, and 10.582 Federal Award Identification Number and Year: Various ? See SEFA Pass-through Entity: Missouri Department of Elementary and Secondary Education (DESE) and Missouri Department of Health and Senior Services Type of Compliance Finding: N ? Special Tests and Provisions Criteria Per the U.S. Department of Agriculture, federal rules and regulations 7 CFR 210.13(b) requires that schools shall obtain a minimum of two food safety inspections during each school year conducted by a state or local government agency responsible for food safety inspections. If a violation occurs during the food safety inspection, a corrective action plan must be implemented, and violations resolved by a specified date. Condition/Context In our sample of ten schools, Kansas City Public Schools (the District) obtained the requisite two food safety inspections at each school during the school year; however, the food safety inspection reports identified critical violations at four schools, which were not corrected by a specified date. Cause The District does not have a process in place to ensure that timely corrective actions were taken for violations identified by inspections conducted by the Kansas City, Missouri Health Department (KCMO Health Department). Effect The District did not comply with food storage, preparation, and service standards established by the KCMO Health Department. Questioned costs None Is the finding a repeat finding No Recommendation We recommend the District resolve all violations identified during food safety inspections within the prescribed timeline and implement a monitoring process to ensure violations are resolved timely. Views of responsible officials/planned corrective actions Management agrees with the finding. See Corrective Action Plan on Organization?s letterhead.
Finding 2022-002 Program: Child Nutrition Cluster Federal Agency: United States Department of Agriculture AL #: Cluster 10.553, 10.555, 10.556, 10.559, and 10.582 Federal Award Identification Number and Year: Various ? See SEFA Pass-through Entity: Missouri Department of Elementary and Secondary Education (DESE) and Missouri Department of Health and Senior Services Type of Compliance Finding: N ? Special Tests and Provisions Criteria Per the U.S. Department of Agriculture, federal rules and regulations 7 CFR 210.13(b) requires that schools shall obtain a minimum of two food safety inspections during each school year conducted by a state or local government agency responsible for food safety inspections. If a violation occurs during the food safety inspection, a corrective action plan must be implemented, and violations resolved by a specified date. Condition/Context In our sample of ten schools, Kansas City Public Schools (the District) obtained the requisite two food safety inspections at each school during the school year; however, the food safety inspection reports identified critical violations at four schools, which were not corrected by a specified date. Cause The District does not have a process in place to ensure that timely corrective actions were taken for violations identified by inspections conducted by the Kansas City, Missouri Health Department (KCMO Health Department). Effect The District did not comply with food storage, preparation, and service standards established by the KCMO Health Department. Questioned costs None Is the finding a repeat finding No Recommendation We recommend the District resolve all violations identified during food safety inspections within the prescribed timeline and implement a monitoring process to ensure violations are resolved timely. Views of responsible officials/planned corrective actions Management agrees with the finding. See Corrective Action Plan on Organization?s letterhead.
Finding 2022-003 Program: Education Stabilization Fund Section 1 Federal Agency: United States Department of Education AL #: Cluster 84.425C, 84.425D, and 84.425R Federal Award Identification Number and Year: Various ? See SEFA Pass-through Entity: Missouri Department of Elementary and Secondary Education (DESE) Type of Compliance Finding: N ? Special Tests and Provisions Criteria Per the U.S. Department of Labor, federal rules and regulations 40 USC 3141-3144, 3146, and 3147; all laborers and mechanics employed by contractors or subcontractors to work on construction contracts in excess of $2,000 financed by federal assistance funds must be paid wages not less than those established for the locality of the project (prevailing wage rates). Condition During discussion, observations, and our understanding of internal control, we observed the District followed the State of Missouri?s guidelines for construction projects, which states that public works projects valued at $75,000 and under are not subject to prevailing wage regardless of federal funding source. Two of the seven construction contracts paid with federal assistance funds that were below $75,000, but in excess of the applicable $2,000 federal threshold, did not have prevailing wage rate clauses. Cause The District did not follow federal rules and regulations regarding prevailing wage rate requirements for construction contracts in excess of $2,000 financed by federal assistance funds. Effect Laborers and mechanics employed by contractors or subcontractors for construction contracts in excess of $2,000 may not have been paid prevailing wage rates established for the locality of the project. Questioned costs $13,420 Is the finding a repeat finding No Recommendation We recommend the District establish a process to ensure that prevailing wage rate clauses are included in contracts that exceed the federal requirement for construction projects financed by federal assistance funds and documentation of certified payrolls on those contracts are obtained. Views of responsible officials/planned corrective actions Management agrees with the finding. See Corrective Action Plan on Organization?s letterhead.
Finding 2022-003 Program: Education Stabilization Fund Section 1 Federal Agency: United States Department of Education AL #: Cluster 84.425C, 84.425D, and 84.425R Federal Award Identification Number and Year: Various ? See SEFA Pass-through Entity: Missouri Department of Elementary and Secondary Education (DESE) Type of Compliance Finding: N ? Special Tests and Provisions Criteria Per the U.S. Department of Labor, federal rules and regulations 40 USC 3141-3144, 3146, and 3147; all laborers and mechanics employed by contractors or subcontractors to work on construction contracts in excess of $2,000 financed by federal assistance funds must be paid wages not less than those established for the locality of the project (prevailing wage rates). Condition During discussion, observations, and our understanding of internal control, we observed the District followed the State of Missouri?s guidelines for construction projects, which states that public works projects valued at $75,000 and under are not subject to prevailing wage regardless of federal funding source. Two of the seven construction contracts paid with federal assistance funds that were below $75,000, but in excess of the applicable $2,000 federal threshold, did not have prevailing wage rate clauses. Cause The District did not follow federal rules and regulations regarding prevailing wage rate requirements for construction contracts in excess of $2,000 financed by federal assistance funds. Effect Laborers and mechanics employed by contractors or subcontractors for construction contracts in excess of $2,000 may not have been paid prevailing wage rates established for the locality of the project. Questioned costs $13,420 Is the finding a repeat finding No Recommendation We recommend the District establish a process to ensure that prevailing wage rate clauses are included in contracts that exceed the federal requirement for construction projects financed by federal assistance funds and documentation of certified payrolls on those contracts are obtained. Views of responsible officials/planned corrective actions Management agrees with the finding. See Corrective Action Plan on Organization?s letterhead.
Finding 2022-003 Program: Education Stabilization Fund Section 1 Federal Agency: United States Department of Education AL #: Cluster 84.425C, 84.425D, and 84.425R Federal Award Identification Number and Year: Various ? See SEFA Pass-through Entity: Missouri Department of Elementary and Secondary Education (DESE) Type of Compliance Finding: N ? Special Tests and Provisions Criteria Per the U.S. Department of Labor, federal rules and regulations 40 USC 3141-3144, 3146, and 3147; all laborers and mechanics employed by contractors or subcontractors to work on construction contracts in excess of $2,000 financed by federal assistance funds must be paid wages not less than those established for the locality of the project (prevailing wage rates). Condition During discussion, observations, and our understanding of internal control, we observed the District followed the State of Missouri?s guidelines for construction projects, which states that public works projects valued at $75,000 and under are not subject to prevailing wage regardless of federal funding source. Two of the seven construction contracts paid with federal assistance funds that were below $75,000, but in excess of the applicable $2,000 federal threshold, did not have prevailing wage rate clauses. Cause The District did not follow federal rules and regulations regarding prevailing wage rate requirements for construction contracts in excess of $2,000 financed by federal assistance funds. Effect Laborers and mechanics employed by contractors or subcontractors for construction contracts in excess of $2,000 may not have been paid prevailing wage rates established for the locality of the project. Questioned costs $13,420 Is the finding a repeat finding No Recommendation We recommend the District establish a process to ensure that prevailing wage rate clauses are included in contracts that exceed the federal requirement for construction projects financed by federal assistance funds and documentation of certified payrolls on those contracts are obtained. Views of responsible officials/planned corrective actions Management agrees with the finding. See Corrective Action Plan on Organization?s letterhead.
Finding 2022-003 Program: Education Stabilization Fund Section 1 Federal Agency: United States Department of Education AL #: Cluster 84.425C, 84.425D, and 84.425R Federal Award Identification Number and Year: Various ? See SEFA Pass-through Entity: Missouri Department of Elementary and Secondary Education (DESE) Type of Compliance Finding: N ? Special Tests and Provisions Criteria Per the U.S. Department of Labor, federal rules and regulations 40 USC 3141-3144, 3146, and 3147; all laborers and mechanics employed by contractors or subcontractors to work on construction contracts in excess of $2,000 financed by federal assistance funds must be paid wages not less than those established for the locality of the project (prevailing wage rates). Condition During discussion, observations, and our understanding of internal control, we observed the District followed the State of Missouri?s guidelines for construction projects, which states that public works projects valued at $75,000 and under are not subject to prevailing wage regardless of federal funding source. Two of the seven construction contracts paid with federal assistance funds that were below $75,000, but in excess of the applicable $2,000 federal threshold, did not have prevailing wage rate clauses. Cause The District did not follow federal rules and regulations regarding prevailing wage rate requirements for construction contracts in excess of $2,000 financed by federal assistance funds. Effect Laborers and mechanics employed by contractors or subcontractors for construction contracts in excess of $2,000 may not have been paid prevailing wage rates established for the locality of the project. Questioned costs $13,420 Is the finding a repeat finding No Recommendation We recommend the District establish a process to ensure that prevailing wage rate clauses are included in contracts that exceed the federal requirement for construction projects financed by federal assistance funds and documentation of certified payrolls on those contracts are obtained. Views of responsible officials/planned corrective actions Management agrees with the finding. See Corrective Action Plan on Organization?s letterhead.
Finding 2022-003 Program: Education Stabilization Fund Section 1 Federal Agency: United States Department of Education AL #: Cluster 84.425C, 84.425D, and 84.425R Federal Award Identification Number and Year: Various ? See SEFA Pass-through Entity: Missouri Department of Elementary and Secondary Education (DESE) Type of Compliance Finding: N ? Special Tests and Provisions Criteria Per the U.S. Department of Labor, federal rules and regulations 40 USC 3141-3144, 3146, and 3147; all laborers and mechanics employed by contractors or subcontractors to work on construction contracts in excess of $2,000 financed by federal assistance funds must be paid wages not less than those established for the locality of the project (prevailing wage rates). Condition During discussion, observations, and our understanding of internal control, we observed the District followed the State of Missouri?s guidelines for construction projects, which states that public works projects valued at $75,000 and under are not subject to prevailing wage regardless of federal funding source. Two of the seven construction contracts paid with federal assistance funds that were below $75,000, but in excess of the applicable $2,000 federal threshold, did not have prevailing wage rate clauses. Cause The District did not follow federal rules and regulations regarding prevailing wage rate requirements for construction contracts in excess of $2,000 financed by federal assistance funds. Effect Laborers and mechanics employed by contractors or subcontractors for construction contracts in excess of $2,000 may not have been paid prevailing wage rates established for the locality of the project. Questioned costs $13,420 Is the finding a repeat finding No Recommendation We recommend the District establish a process to ensure that prevailing wage rate clauses are included in contracts that exceed the federal requirement for construction projects financed by federal assistance funds and documentation of certified payrolls on those contracts are obtained. Views of responsible officials/planned corrective actions Management agrees with the finding. See Corrective Action Plan on Organization?s letterhead.
Finding 2022-003 Program: Education Stabilization Fund Section 1 Federal Agency: United States Department of Education AL #: Cluster 84.425C, 84.425D, and 84.425R Federal Award Identification Number and Year: Various ? See SEFA Pass-through Entity: Missouri Department of Elementary and Secondary Education (DESE) Type of Compliance Finding: N ? Special Tests and Provisions Criteria Per the U.S. Department of Labor, federal rules and regulations 40 USC 3141-3144, 3146, and 3147; all laborers and mechanics employed by contractors or subcontractors to work on construction contracts in excess of $2,000 financed by federal assistance funds must be paid wages not less than those established for the locality of the project (prevailing wage rates). Condition During discussion, observations, and our understanding of internal control, we observed the District followed the State of Missouri?s guidelines for construction projects, which states that public works projects valued at $75,000 and under are not subject to prevailing wage regardless of federal funding source. Two of the seven construction contracts paid with federal assistance funds that were below $75,000, but in excess of the applicable $2,000 federal threshold, did not have prevailing wage rate clauses. Cause The District did not follow federal rules and regulations regarding prevailing wage rate requirements for construction contracts in excess of $2,000 financed by federal assistance funds. Effect Laborers and mechanics employed by contractors or subcontractors for construction contracts in excess of $2,000 may not have been paid prevailing wage rates established for the locality of the project. Questioned costs $13,420 Is the finding a repeat finding No Recommendation We recommend the District establish a process to ensure that prevailing wage rate clauses are included in contracts that exceed the federal requirement for construction projects financed by federal assistance funds and documentation of certified payrolls on those contracts are obtained. Views of responsible officials/planned corrective actions Management agrees with the finding. See Corrective Action Plan on Organization?s letterhead.
Finding 2022-003 Program: Education Stabilization Fund Section 1 Federal Agency: United States Department of Education AL #: Cluster 84.425C, 84.425D, and 84.425R Federal Award Identification Number and Year: Various ? See SEFA Pass-through Entity: Missouri Department of Elementary and Secondary Education (DESE) Type of Compliance Finding: N ? Special Tests and Provisions Criteria Per the U.S. Department of Labor, federal rules and regulations 40 USC 3141-3144, 3146, and 3147; all laborers and mechanics employed by contractors or subcontractors to work on construction contracts in excess of $2,000 financed by federal assistance funds must be paid wages not less than those established for the locality of the project (prevailing wage rates). Condition During discussion, observations, and our understanding of internal control, we observed the District followed the State of Missouri?s guidelines for construction projects, which states that public works projects valued at $75,000 and under are not subject to prevailing wage regardless of federal funding source. Two of the seven construction contracts paid with federal assistance funds that were below $75,000, but in excess of the applicable $2,000 federal threshold, did not have prevailing wage rate clauses. Cause The District did not follow federal rules and regulations regarding prevailing wage rate requirements for construction contracts in excess of $2,000 financed by federal assistance funds. Effect Laborers and mechanics employed by contractors or subcontractors for construction contracts in excess of $2,000 may not have been paid prevailing wage rates established for the locality of the project. Questioned costs $13,420 Is the finding a repeat finding No Recommendation We recommend the District establish a process to ensure that prevailing wage rate clauses are included in contracts that exceed the federal requirement for construction projects financed by federal assistance funds and documentation of certified payrolls on those contracts are obtained. Views of responsible officials/planned corrective actions Management agrees with the finding. See Corrective Action Plan on Organization?s letterhead.
Finding 2022-003 Program: Education Stabilization Fund Section 1 Federal Agency: United States Department of Education AL #: Cluster 84.425C, 84.425D, and 84.425R Federal Award Identification Number and Year: Various ? See SEFA Pass-through Entity: Missouri Department of Elementary and Secondary Education (DESE) Type of Compliance Finding: N ? Special Tests and Provisions Criteria Per the U.S. Department of Labor, federal rules and regulations 40 USC 3141-3144, 3146, and 3147; all laborers and mechanics employed by contractors or subcontractors to work on construction contracts in excess of $2,000 financed by federal assistance funds must be paid wages not less than those established for the locality of the project (prevailing wage rates). Condition During discussion, observations, and our understanding of internal control, we observed the District followed the State of Missouri?s guidelines for construction projects, which states that public works projects valued at $75,000 and under are not subject to prevailing wage regardless of federal funding source. Two of the seven construction contracts paid with federal assistance funds that were below $75,000, but in excess of the applicable $2,000 federal threshold, did not have prevailing wage rate clauses. Cause The District did not follow federal rules and regulations regarding prevailing wage rate requirements for construction contracts in excess of $2,000 financed by federal assistance funds. Effect Laborers and mechanics employed by contractors or subcontractors for construction contracts in excess of $2,000 may not have been paid prevailing wage rates established for the locality of the project. Questioned costs $13,420 Is the finding a repeat finding No Recommendation We recommend the District establish a process to ensure that prevailing wage rate clauses are included in contracts that exceed the federal requirement for construction projects financed by federal assistance funds and documentation of certified payrolls on those contracts are obtained. Views of responsible officials/planned corrective actions Management agrees with the finding. See Corrective Action Plan on Organization?s letterhead.
Finding 2022-002 Program: Child Nutrition Cluster Federal Agency: United States Department of Agriculture AL #: Cluster 10.553, 10.555, 10.556, 10.559, and 10.582 Federal Award Identification Number and Year: Various ? See SEFA Pass-through Entity: Missouri Department of Elementary and Secondary Education (DESE) and Missouri Department of Health and Senior Services Type of Compliance Finding: N ? Special Tests and Provisions Criteria Per the U.S. Department of Agriculture, federal rules and regulations 7 CFR 210.13(b) requires that schools shall obtain a minimum of two food safety inspections during each school year conducted by a state or local government agency responsible for food safety inspections. If a violation occurs during the food safety inspection, a corrective action plan must be implemented, and violations resolved by a specified date. Condition/Context In our sample of ten schools, Kansas City Public Schools (the District) obtained the requisite two food safety inspections at each school during the school year; however, the food safety inspection reports identified critical violations at four schools, which were not corrected by a specified date. Cause The District does not have a process in place to ensure that timely corrective actions were taken for violations identified by inspections conducted by the Kansas City, Missouri Health Department (KCMO Health Department). Effect The District did not comply with food storage, preparation, and service standards established by the KCMO Health Department. Questioned costs None Is the finding a repeat finding No Recommendation We recommend the District resolve all violations identified during food safety inspections within the prescribed timeline and implement a monitoring process to ensure violations are resolved timely. Views of responsible officials/planned corrective actions Management agrees with the finding. See Corrective Action Plan on Organization?s letterhead.
Finding 2022-002 Program: Child Nutrition Cluster Federal Agency: United States Department of Agriculture AL #: Cluster 10.553, 10.555, 10.556, 10.559, and 10.582 Federal Award Identification Number and Year: Various ? See SEFA Pass-through Entity: Missouri Department of Elementary and Secondary Education (DESE) and Missouri Department of Health and Senior Services Type of Compliance Finding: N ? Special Tests and Provisions Criteria Per the U.S. Department of Agriculture, federal rules and regulations 7 CFR 210.13(b) requires that schools shall obtain a minimum of two food safety inspections during each school year conducted by a state or local government agency responsible for food safety inspections. If a violation occurs during the food safety inspection, a corrective action plan must be implemented, and violations resolved by a specified date. Condition/Context In our sample of ten schools, Kansas City Public Schools (the District) obtained the requisite two food safety inspections at each school during the school year; however, the food safety inspection reports identified critical violations at four schools, which were not corrected by a specified date. Cause The District does not have a process in place to ensure that timely corrective actions were taken for violations identified by inspections conducted by the Kansas City, Missouri Health Department (KCMO Health Department). Effect The District did not comply with food storage, preparation, and service standards established by the KCMO Health Department. Questioned costs None Is the finding a repeat finding No Recommendation We recommend the District resolve all violations identified during food safety inspections within the prescribed timeline and implement a monitoring process to ensure violations are resolved timely. Views of responsible officials/planned corrective actions Management agrees with the finding. See Corrective Action Plan on Organization?s letterhead.
Finding 2022-002 Program: Child Nutrition Cluster Federal Agency: United States Department of Agriculture AL #: Cluster 10.553, 10.555, 10.556, 10.559, and 10.582 Federal Award Identification Number and Year: Various ? See SEFA Pass-through Entity: Missouri Department of Elementary and Secondary Education (DESE) and Missouri Department of Health and Senior Services Type of Compliance Finding: N ? Special Tests and Provisions Criteria Per the U.S. Department of Agriculture, federal rules and regulations 7 CFR 210.13(b) requires that schools shall obtain a minimum of two food safety inspections during each school year conducted by a state or local government agency responsible for food safety inspections. If a violation occurs during the food safety inspection, a corrective action plan must be implemented, and violations resolved by a specified date. Condition/Context In our sample of ten schools, Kansas City Public Schools (the District) obtained the requisite two food safety inspections at each school during the school year; however, the food safety inspection reports identified critical violations at four schools, which were not corrected by a specified date. Cause The District does not have a process in place to ensure that timely corrective actions were taken for violations identified by inspections conducted by the Kansas City, Missouri Health Department (KCMO Health Department). Effect The District did not comply with food storage, preparation, and service standards established by the KCMO Health Department. Questioned costs None Is the finding a repeat finding No Recommendation We recommend the District resolve all violations identified during food safety inspections within the prescribed timeline and implement a monitoring process to ensure violations are resolved timely. Views of responsible officials/planned corrective actions Management agrees with the finding. See Corrective Action Plan on Organization?s letterhead.
Finding 2022-002 Program: Child Nutrition Cluster Federal Agency: United States Department of Agriculture AL #: Cluster 10.553, 10.555, 10.556, 10.559, and 10.582 Federal Award Identification Number and Year: Various ? See SEFA Pass-through Entity: Missouri Department of Elementary and Secondary Education (DESE) and Missouri Department of Health and Senior Services Type of Compliance Finding: N ? Special Tests and Provisions Criteria Per the U.S. Department of Agriculture, federal rules and regulations 7 CFR 210.13(b) requires that schools shall obtain a minimum of two food safety inspections during each school year conducted by a state or local government agency responsible for food safety inspections. If a violation occurs during the food safety inspection, a corrective action plan must be implemented, and violations resolved by a specified date. Condition/Context In our sample of ten schools, Kansas City Public Schools (the District) obtained the requisite two food safety inspections at each school during the school year; however, the food safety inspection reports identified critical violations at four schools, which were not corrected by a specified date. Cause The District does not have a process in place to ensure that timely corrective actions were taken for violations identified by inspections conducted by the Kansas City, Missouri Health Department (KCMO Health Department). Effect The District did not comply with food storage, preparation, and service standards established by the KCMO Health Department. Questioned costs None Is the finding a repeat finding No Recommendation We recommend the District resolve all violations identified during food safety inspections within the prescribed timeline and implement a monitoring process to ensure violations are resolved timely. Views of responsible officials/planned corrective actions Management agrees with the finding. See Corrective Action Plan on Organization?s letterhead.
Finding 2022-002 Program: Child Nutrition Cluster Federal Agency: United States Department of Agriculture AL #: Cluster 10.553, 10.555, 10.556, 10.559, and 10.582 Federal Award Identification Number and Year: Various ? See SEFA Pass-through Entity: Missouri Department of Elementary and Secondary Education (DESE) and Missouri Department of Health and Senior Services Type of Compliance Finding: N ? Special Tests and Provisions Criteria Per the U.S. Department of Agriculture, federal rules and regulations 7 CFR 210.13(b) requires that schools shall obtain a minimum of two food safety inspections during each school year conducted by a state or local government agency responsible for food safety inspections. If a violation occurs during the food safety inspection, a corrective action plan must be implemented, and violations resolved by a specified date. Condition/Context In our sample of ten schools, Kansas City Public Schools (the District) obtained the requisite two food safety inspections at each school during the school year; however, the food safety inspection reports identified critical violations at four schools, which were not corrected by a specified date. Cause The District does not have a process in place to ensure that timely corrective actions were taken for violations identified by inspections conducted by the Kansas City, Missouri Health Department (KCMO Health Department). Effect The District did not comply with food storage, preparation, and service standards established by the KCMO Health Department. Questioned costs None Is the finding a repeat finding No Recommendation We recommend the District resolve all violations identified during food safety inspections within the prescribed timeline and implement a monitoring process to ensure violations are resolved timely. Views of responsible officials/planned corrective actions Management agrees with the finding. See Corrective Action Plan on Organization?s letterhead.
Finding 2022-002 Program: Child Nutrition Cluster Federal Agency: United States Department of Agriculture AL #: Cluster 10.553, 10.555, 10.556, 10.559, and 10.582 Federal Award Identification Number and Year: Various ? See SEFA Pass-through Entity: Missouri Department of Elementary and Secondary Education (DESE) and Missouri Department of Health and Senior Services Type of Compliance Finding: N ? Special Tests and Provisions Criteria Per the U.S. Department of Agriculture, federal rules and regulations 7 CFR 210.13(b) requires that schools shall obtain a minimum of two food safety inspections during each school year conducted by a state or local government agency responsible for food safety inspections. If a violation occurs during the food safety inspection, a corrective action plan must be implemented, and violations resolved by a specified date. Condition/Context In our sample of ten schools, Kansas City Public Schools (the District) obtained the requisite two food safety inspections at each school during the school year; however, the food safety inspection reports identified critical violations at four schools, which were not corrected by a specified date. Cause The District does not have a process in place to ensure that timely corrective actions were taken for violations identified by inspections conducted by the Kansas City, Missouri Health Department (KCMO Health Department). Effect The District did not comply with food storage, preparation, and service standards established by the KCMO Health Department. Questioned costs None Is the finding a repeat finding No Recommendation We recommend the District resolve all violations identified during food safety inspections within the prescribed timeline and implement a monitoring process to ensure violations are resolved timely. Views of responsible officials/planned corrective actions Management agrees with the finding. See Corrective Action Plan on Organization?s letterhead.
Finding 2022-002 Program: Child Nutrition Cluster Federal Agency: United States Department of Agriculture AL #: Cluster 10.553, 10.555, 10.556, 10.559, and 10.582 Federal Award Identification Number and Year: Various ? See SEFA Pass-through Entity: Missouri Department of Elementary and Secondary Education (DESE) and Missouri Department of Health and Senior Services Type of Compliance Finding: N ? Special Tests and Provisions Criteria Per the U.S. Department of Agriculture, federal rules and regulations 7 CFR 210.13(b) requires that schools shall obtain a minimum of two food safety inspections during each school year conducted by a state or local government agency responsible for food safety inspections. If a violation occurs during the food safety inspection, a corrective action plan must be implemented, and violations resolved by a specified date. Condition/Context In our sample of ten schools, Kansas City Public Schools (the District) obtained the requisite two food safety inspections at each school during the school year; however, the food safety inspection reports identified critical violations at four schools, which were not corrected by a specified date. Cause The District does not have a process in place to ensure that timely corrective actions were taken for violations identified by inspections conducted by the Kansas City, Missouri Health Department (KCMO Health Department). Effect The District did not comply with food storage, preparation, and service standards established by the KCMO Health Department. Questioned costs None Is the finding a repeat finding No Recommendation We recommend the District resolve all violations identified during food safety inspections within the prescribed timeline and implement a monitoring process to ensure violations are resolved timely. Views of responsible officials/planned corrective actions Management agrees with the finding. See Corrective Action Plan on Organization?s letterhead.
Finding 2022-002 Program: Child Nutrition Cluster Federal Agency: United States Department of Agriculture AL #: Cluster 10.553, 10.555, 10.556, 10.559, and 10.582 Federal Award Identification Number and Year: Various ? See SEFA Pass-through Entity: Missouri Department of Elementary and Secondary Education (DESE) and Missouri Department of Health and Senior Services Type of Compliance Finding: N ? Special Tests and Provisions Criteria Per the U.S. Department of Agriculture, federal rules and regulations 7 CFR 210.13(b) requires that schools shall obtain a minimum of two food safety inspections during each school year conducted by a state or local government agency responsible for food safety inspections. If a violation occurs during the food safety inspection, a corrective action plan must be implemented, and violations resolved by a specified date. Condition/Context In our sample of ten schools, Kansas City Public Schools (the District) obtained the requisite two food safety inspections at each school during the school year; however, the food safety inspection reports identified critical violations at four schools, which were not corrected by a specified date. Cause The District does not have a process in place to ensure that timely corrective actions were taken for violations identified by inspections conducted by the Kansas City, Missouri Health Department (KCMO Health Department). Effect The District did not comply with food storage, preparation, and service standards established by the KCMO Health Department. Questioned costs None Is the finding a repeat finding No Recommendation We recommend the District resolve all violations identified during food safety inspections within the prescribed timeline and implement a monitoring process to ensure violations are resolved timely. Views of responsible officials/planned corrective actions Management agrees with the finding. See Corrective Action Plan on Organization?s letterhead.
Finding 2022-003 Program: Education Stabilization Fund Section 1 Federal Agency: United States Department of Education AL #: Cluster 84.425C, 84.425D, and 84.425R Federal Award Identification Number and Year: Various ? See SEFA Pass-through Entity: Missouri Department of Elementary and Secondary Education (DESE) Type of Compliance Finding: N ? Special Tests and Provisions Criteria Per the U.S. Department of Labor, federal rules and regulations 40 USC 3141-3144, 3146, and 3147; all laborers and mechanics employed by contractors or subcontractors to work on construction contracts in excess of $2,000 financed by federal assistance funds must be paid wages not less than those established for the locality of the project (prevailing wage rates). Condition During discussion, observations, and our understanding of internal control, we observed the District followed the State of Missouri?s guidelines for construction projects, which states that public works projects valued at $75,000 and under are not subject to prevailing wage regardless of federal funding source. Two of the seven construction contracts paid with federal assistance funds that were below $75,000, but in excess of the applicable $2,000 federal threshold, did not have prevailing wage rate clauses. Cause The District did not follow federal rules and regulations regarding prevailing wage rate requirements for construction contracts in excess of $2,000 financed by federal assistance funds. Effect Laborers and mechanics employed by contractors or subcontractors for construction contracts in excess of $2,000 may not have been paid prevailing wage rates established for the locality of the project. Questioned costs $13,420 Is the finding a repeat finding No Recommendation We recommend the District establish a process to ensure that prevailing wage rate clauses are included in contracts that exceed the federal requirement for construction projects financed by federal assistance funds and documentation of certified payrolls on those contracts are obtained. Views of responsible officials/planned corrective actions Management agrees with the finding. See Corrective Action Plan on Organization?s letterhead.
Finding 2022-003 Program: Education Stabilization Fund Section 1 Federal Agency: United States Department of Education AL #: Cluster 84.425C, 84.425D, and 84.425R Federal Award Identification Number and Year: Various ? See SEFA Pass-through Entity: Missouri Department of Elementary and Secondary Education (DESE) Type of Compliance Finding: N ? Special Tests and Provisions Criteria Per the U.S. Department of Labor, federal rules and regulations 40 USC 3141-3144, 3146, and 3147; all laborers and mechanics employed by contractors or subcontractors to work on construction contracts in excess of $2,000 financed by federal assistance funds must be paid wages not less than those established for the locality of the project (prevailing wage rates). Condition During discussion, observations, and our understanding of internal control, we observed the District followed the State of Missouri?s guidelines for construction projects, which states that public works projects valued at $75,000 and under are not subject to prevailing wage regardless of federal funding source. Two of the seven construction contracts paid with federal assistance funds that were below $75,000, but in excess of the applicable $2,000 federal threshold, did not have prevailing wage rate clauses. Cause The District did not follow federal rules and regulations regarding prevailing wage rate requirements for construction contracts in excess of $2,000 financed by federal assistance funds. Effect Laborers and mechanics employed by contractors or subcontractors for construction contracts in excess of $2,000 may not have been paid prevailing wage rates established for the locality of the project. Questioned costs $13,420 Is the finding a repeat finding No Recommendation We recommend the District establish a process to ensure that prevailing wage rate clauses are included in contracts that exceed the federal requirement for construction projects financed by federal assistance funds and documentation of certified payrolls on those contracts are obtained. Views of responsible officials/planned corrective actions Management agrees with the finding. See Corrective Action Plan on Organization?s letterhead.
Finding 2022-003 Program: Education Stabilization Fund Section 1 Federal Agency: United States Department of Education AL #: Cluster 84.425C, 84.425D, and 84.425R Federal Award Identification Number and Year: Various ? See SEFA Pass-through Entity: Missouri Department of Elementary and Secondary Education (DESE) Type of Compliance Finding: N ? Special Tests and Provisions Criteria Per the U.S. Department of Labor, federal rules and regulations 40 USC 3141-3144, 3146, and 3147; all laborers and mechanics employed by contractors or subcontractors to work on construction contracts in excess of $2,000 financed by federal assistance funds must be paid wages not less than those established for the locality of the project (prevailing wage rates). Condition During discussion, observations, and our understanding of internal control, we observed the District followed the State of Missouri?s guidelines for construction projects, which states that public works projects valued at $75,000 and under are not subject to prevailing wage regardless of federal funding source. Two of the seven construction contracts paid with federal assistance funds that were below $75,000, but in excess of the applicable $2,000 federal threshold, did not have prevailing wage rate clauses. Cause The District did not follow federal rules and regulations regarding prevailing wage rate requirements for construction contracts in excess of $2,000 financed by federal assistance funds. Effect Laborers and mechanics employed by contractors or subcontractors for construction contracts in excess of $2,000 may not have been paid prevailing wage rates established for the locality of the project. Questioned costs $13,420 Is the finding a repeat finding No Recommendation We recommend the District establish a process to ensure that prevailing wage rate clauses are included in contracts that exceed the federal requirement for construction projects financed by federal assistance funds and documentation of certified payrolls on those contracts are obtained. Views of responsible officials/planned corrective actions Management agrees with the finding. See Corrective Action Plan on Organization?s letterhead.
Finding 2022-003 Program: Education Stabilization Fund Section 1 Federal Agency: United States Department of Education AL #: Cluster 84.425C, 84.425D, and 84.425R Federal Award Identification Number and Year: Various ? See SEFA Pass-through Entity: Missouri Department of Elementary and Secondary Education (DESE) Type of Compliance Finding: N ? Special Tests and Provisions Criteria Per the U.S. Department of Labor, federal rules and regulations 40 USC 3141-3144, 3146, and 3147; all laborers and mechanics employed by contractors or subcontractors to work on construction contracts in excess of $2,000 financed by federal assistance funds must be paid wages not less than those established for the locality of the project (prevailing wage rates). Condition During discussion, observations, and our understanding of internal control, we observed the District followed the State of Missouri?s guidelines for construction projects, which states that public works projects valued at $75,000 and under are not subject to prevailing wage regardless of federal funding source. Two of the seven construction contracts paid with federal assistance funds that were below $75,000, but in excess of the applicable $2,000 federal threshold, did not have prevailing wage rate clauses. Cause The District did not follow federal rules and regulations regarding prevailing wage rate requirements for construction contracts in excess of $2,000 financed by federal assistance funds. Effect Laborers and mechanics employed by contractors or subcontractors for construction contracts in excess of $2,000 may not have been paid prevailing wage rates established for the locality of the project. Questioned costs $13,420 Is the finding a repeat finding No Recommendation We recommend the District establish a process to ensure that prevailing wage rate clauses are included in contracts that exceed the federal requirement for construction projects financed by federal assistance funds and documentation of certified payrolls on those contracts are obtained. Views of responsible officials/planned corrective actions Management agrees with the finding. See Corrective Action Plan on Organization?s letterhead.
Finding 2022-003 Program: Education Stabilization Fund Section 1 Federal Agency: United States Department of Education AL #: Cluster 84.425C, 84.425D, and 84.425R Federal Award Identification Number and Year: Various ? See SEFA Pass-through Entity: Missouri Department of Elementary and Secondary Education (DESE) Type of Compliance Finding: N ? Special Tests and Provisions Criteria Per the U.S. Department of Labor, federal rules and regulations 40 USC 3141-3144, 3146, and 3147; all laborers and mechanics employed by contractors or subcontractors to work on construction contracts in excess of $2,000 financed by federal assistance funds must be paid wages not less than those established for the locality of the project (prevailing wage rates). Condition During discussion, observations, and our understanding of internal control, we observed the District followed the State of Missouri?s guidelines for construction projects, which states that public works projects valued at $75,000 and under are not subject to prevailing wage regardless of federal funding source. Two of the seven construction contracts paid with federal assistance funds that were below $75,000, but in excess of the applicable $2,000 federal threshold, did not have prevailing wage rate clauses. Cause The District did not follow federal rules and regulations regarding prevailing wage rate requirements for construction contracts in excess of $2,000 financed by federal assistance funds. Effect Laborers and mechanics employed by contractors or subcontractors for construction contracts in excess of $2,000 may not have been paid prevailing wage rates established for the locality of the project. Questioned costs $13,420 Is the finding a repeat finding No Recommendation We recommend the District establish a process to ensure that prevailing wage rate clauses are included in contracts that exceed the federal requirement for construction projects financed by federal assistance funds and documentation of certified payrolls on those contracts are obtained. Views of responsible officials/planned corrective actions Management agrees with the finding. See Corrective Action Plan on Organization?s letterhead.
Finding 2022-003 Program: Education Stabilization Fund Section 1 Federal Agency: United States Department of Education AL #: Cluster 84.425C, 84.425D, and 84.425R Federal Award Identification Number and Year: Various ? See SEFA Pass-through Entity: Missouri Department of Elementary and Secondary Education (DESE) Type of Compliance Finding: N ? Special Tests and Provisions Criteria Per the U.S. Department of Labor, federal rules and regulations 40 USC 3141-3144, 3146, and 3147; all laborers and mechanics employed by contractors or subcontractors to work on construction contracts in excess of $2,000 financed by federal assistance funds must be paid wages not less than those established for the locality of the project (prevailing wage rates). Condition During discussion, observations, and our understanding of internal control, we observed the District followed the State of Missouri?s guidelines for construction projects, which states that public works projects valued at $75,000 and under are not subject to prevailing wage regardless of federal funding source. Two of the seven construction contracts paid with federal assistance funds that were below $75,000, but in excess of the applicable $2,000 federal threshold, did not have prevailing wage rate clauses. Cause The District did not follow federal rules and regulations regarding prevailing wage rate requirements for construction contracts in excess of $2,000 financed by federal assistance funds. Effect Laborers and mechanics employed by contractors or subcontractors for construction contracts in excess of $2,000 may not have been paid prevailing wage rates established for the locality of the project. Questioned costs $13,420 Is the finding a repeat finding No Recommendation We recommend the District establish a process to ensure that prevailing wage rate clauses are included in contracts that exceed the federal requirement for construction projects financed by federal assistance funds and documentation of certified payrolls on those contracts are obtained. Views of responsible officials/planned corrective actions Management agrees with the finding. See Corrective Action Plan on Organization?s letterhead.
Finding 2022-003 Program: Education Stabilization Fund Section 1 Federal Agency: United States Department of Education AL #: Cluster 84.425C, 84.425D, and 84.425R Federal Award Identification Number and Year: Various ? See SEFA Pass-through Entity: Missouri Department of Elementary and Secondary Education (DESE) Type of Compliance Finding: N ? Special Tests and Provisions Criteria Per the U.S. Department of Labor, federal rules and regulations 40 USC 3141-3144, 3146, and 3147; all laborers and mechanics employed by contractors or subcontractors to work on construction contracts in excess of $2,000 financed by federal assistance funds must be paid wages not less than those established for the locality of the project (prevailing wage rates). Condition During discussion, observations, and our understanding of internal control, we observed the District followed the State of Missouri?s guidelines for construction projects, which states that public works projects valued at $75,000 and under are not subject to prevailing wage regardless of federal funding source. Two of the seven construction contracts paid with federal assistance funds that were below $75,000, but in excess of the applicable $2,000 federal threshold, did not have prevailing wage rate clauses. Cause The District did not follow federal rules and regulations regarding prevailing wage rate requirements for construction contracts in excess of $2,000 financed by federal assistance funds. Effect Laborers and mechanics employed by contractors or subcontractors for construction contracts in excess of $2,000 may not have been paid prevailing wage rates established for the locality of the project. Questioned costs $13,420 Is the finding a repeat finding No Recommendation We recommend the District establish a process to ensure that prevailing wage rate clauses are included in contracts that exceed the federal requirement for construction projects financed by federal assistance funds and documentation of certified payrolls on those contracts are obtained. Views of responsible officials/planned corrective actions Management agrees with the finding. See Corrective Action Plan on Organization?s letterhead.