Audit 358361

FY End
2024-06-30
Total Expended
$28.99M
Findings
12
Programs
18
Year: 2024 Accepted: 2025-06-09

Organization Exclusion Status:

Checking exclusion status...

Findings

ID Ref Severity Repeat Requirement
564250 2024-001 Significant Deficiency - B
564251 2024-001 Significant Deficiency - B
564252 2024-001 Significant Deficiency - B
564253 2024-001 Significant Deficiency - B
564254 2024-002 Significant Deficiency - L
564255 2024-002 Significant Deficiency - L
1140692 2024-001 Significant Deficiency - B
1140693 2024-001 Significant Deficiency - B
1140694 2024-001 Significant Deficiency - B
1140695 2024-001 Significant Deficiency - B
1140696 2024-002 Significant Deficiency - L
1140697 2024-002 Significant Deficiency - L

Contacts

Name Title Type
JFQYRDQLNSK1 Scott Little Auditee
5206965130 Christopher W. Heinfeld, CPA Auditor
No contacts on file

Notes to SEFA

Title: Assistance Listing Numbers Accounting Policies: The accompanying Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (Schedule) includes the federal grant activity of Amphitheater Unified School District No. 10 under programs of the federal government for the year ended June 30, 2024. The information in the Schedule is presented in accordance with the requirements of Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance). Because the Schedule presents only a selected portion of the operations of the District, it is not intended to and does not present the financial position, changes in net position or cash flows of the District. Expenditures reported on the Schedule are reported on the modified accrual basis of accounting. Such expenditures are recognized following the cost principles contained in the Uniform Guidance, wherein certain types of expenditures are not allowable or are limited as to reimbursement. Any negative amounts shown on the Schedule represent adjustments or credits made in the normal course of business to amounts reported as expenditures in prior years. Pass-through entity identifying numbers are presented where available. De Minimis Rate Used: N Rate Explanation: The auditee did not use the de minimis indirect cost rate. The program titles and Assistance Listing numbers were obtained from the federal or pass-through grantor or through sam.gov. If the three-digit Assistance Listing extension is unknown, there is a U followed by a two-digit number in the Assistance Listing extension to identify one or more Federal award lines from that program. The first Federal program with an unknown three-digit extension is indicated with U01 for all award lines associated with that program, the second is U02, etc.

Finding Details

Finding Number: 2024‐001 Repeat Finding: No Program Name/Assistance Listing Title: Child Nutrition Cluster Assistance Listing Numbers: 10.553, 10.555, 10.559 Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Agriculture Federal Award Numbers: 6AZ300400, 7AZ300AZ3 Pass‐Through Agency: Arizona Department of Education Questioned Costs: $58,433 Type of Finding: Noncompliance, Significant Deficiency Compliance Requirement: Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Criteria Under 2 CFR §200.303, the District is required to establish and maintain effective internal controls over the federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the District is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award. Additionally, 2 CFR §200.439 requires capital expenditures for special purpose equipment with a unit cost of $5,000 or more to have the prior written approval of the Federal awarding agency or pass‐through entity. This includes ensuring a Capital Expenditure Pre‐Approval Request Form is submitted to Arizona Department of Education (ADE) for approval prior to purchasing equipment that is not included on ADE's Food and Nutrition Service approved equipment list. Condition The District did not submit a Capital Expenditure Pre‐Approval Request Form to ADE for approval prior to purchasing equipment items not on the ADE Pre‐Approved Capital Equipment list. Cause The District was unaware that it was required to get pre‐approval from ADE for this type of purchase. Effect The District charged unallowable costs to the program. Context The District purchased two software systems related to the CNC POS for $20,920 and $29,692, and one garbage disposal for $7,821, without submitting a Capital Expenditure Pre‐Approval Request Form to ADE for approval prior to purchasing items not on the ADE Pre‐Approved Capital Equipment list. The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendation Management should review all transactions to ensure that program costs are allowable and in adherence to applicable federal requirements. Views of Responsible Officials See Corrective Action Plan.
Finding Number: 2024‐001 Repeat Finding: No Program Name/Assistance Listing Title: Child Nutrition Cluster Assistance Listing Numbers: 10.553, 10.555, 10.559 Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Agriculture Federal Award Numbers: 6AZ300400, 7AZ300AZ3 Pass‐Through Agency: Arizona Department of Education Questioned Costs: $58,433 Type of Finding: Noncompliance, Significant Deficiency Compliance Requirement: Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Criteria Under 2 CFR §200.303, the District is required to establish and maintain effective internal controls over the federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the District is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award. Additionally, 2 CFR §200.439 requires capital expenditures for special purpose equipment with a unit cost of $5,000 or more to have the prior written approval of the Federal awarding agency or pass‐through entity. This includes ensuring a Capital Expenditure Pre‐Approval Request Form is submitted to Arizona Department of Education (ADE) for approval prior to purchasing equipment that is not included on ADE's Food and Nutrition Service approved equipment list. Condition The District did not submit a Capital Expenditure Pre‐Approval Request Form to ADE for approval prior to purchasing equipment items not on the ADE Pre‐Approved Capital Equipment list. Cause The District was unaware that it was required to get pre‐approval from ADE for this type of purchase. Effect The District charged unallowable costs to the program. Context The District purchased two software systems related to the CNC POS for $20,920 and $29,692, and one garbage disposal for $7,821, without submitting a Capital Expenditure Pre‐Approval Request Form to ADE for approval prior to purchasing items not on the ADE Pre‐Approved Capital Equipment list. The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendation Management should review all transactions to ensure that program costs are allowable and in adherence to applicable federal requirements. Views of Responsible Officials See Corrective Action Plan.
Finding Number: 2024‐001 Repeat Finding: No Program Name/Assistance Listing Title: Child Nutrition Cluster Assistance Listing Numbers: 10.553, 10.555, 10.559 Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Agriculture Federal Award Numbers: 6AZ300400, 7AZ300AZ3 Pass‐Through Agency: Arizona Department of Education Questioned Costs: $58,433 Type of Finding: Noncompliance, Significant Deficiency Compliance Requirement: Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Criteria Under 2 CFR §200.303, the District is required to establish and maintain effective internal controls over the federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the District is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award. Additionally, 2 CFR §200.439 requires capital expenditures for special purpose equipment with a unit cost of $5,000 or more to have the prior written approval of the Federal awarding agency or pass‐through entity. This includes ensuring a Capital Expenditure Pre‐Approval Request Form is submitted to Arizona Department of Education (ADE) for approval prior to purchasing equipment that is not included on ADE's Food and Nutrition Service approved equipment list. Condition The District did not submit a Capital Expenditure Pre‐Approval Request Form to ADE for approval prior to purchasing equipment items not on the ADE Pre‐Approved Capital Equipment list. Cause The District was unaware that it was required to get pre‐approval from ADE for this type of purchase. Effect The District charged unallowable costs to the program. Context The District purchased two software systems related to the CNC POS for $20,920 and $29,692, and one garbage disposal for $7,821, without submitting a Capital Expenditure Pre‐Approval Request Form to ADE for approval prior to purchasing items not on the ADE Pre‐Approved Capital Equipment list. The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendation Management should review all transactions to ensure that program costs are allowable and in adherence to applicable federal requirements. Views of Responsible Officials See Corrective Action Plan.
Finding Number: 2024‐001 Repeat Finding: No Program Name/Assistance Listing Title: Child Nutrition Cluster Assistance Listing Numbers: 10.553, 10.555, 10.559 Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Agriculture Federal Award Numbers: 6AZ300400, 7AZ300AZ3 Pass‐Through Agency: Arizona Department of Education Questioned Costs: $58,433 Type of Finding: Noncompliance, Significant Deficiency Compliance Requirement: Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Criteria Under 2 CFR §200.303, the District is required to establish and maintain effective internal controls over the federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the District is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award. Additionally, 2 CFR §200.439 requires capital expenditures for special purpose equipment with a unit cost of $5,000 or more to have the prior written approval of the Federal awarding agency or pass‐through entity. This includes ensuring a Capital Expenditure Pre‐Approval Request Form is submitted to Arizona Department of Education (ADE) for approval prior to purchasing equipment that is not included on ADE's Food and Nutrition Service approved equipment list. Condition The District did not submit a Capital Expenditure Pre‐Approval Request Form to ADE for approval prior to purchasing equipment items not on the ADE Pre‐Approved Capital Equipment list. Cause The District was unaware that it was required to get pre‐approval from ADE for this type of purchase. Effect The District charged unallowable costs to the program. Context The District purchased two software systems related to the CNC POS for $20,920 and $29,692, and one garbage disposal for $7,821, without submitting a Capital Expenditure Pre‐Approval Request Form to ADE for approval prior to purchasing items not on the ADE Pre‐Approved Capital Equipment list. The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendation Management should review all transactions to ensure that program costs are allowable and in adherence to applicable federal requirements. Views of Responsible Officials See Corrective Action Plan.
Finding Number: 2024‐002 Repeat Finding: No Program Name/Assistance Listing Title: COVID‐19 Education Stabilization Fund Assistance Listing Numbers: 84.425D, 84.425U Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Education Federal Award Numbers: S425D210038, S425U210038 Pass‐Through Agency: Arizona Department of Education Questioned Costs: N/A Type of Finding: Noncompliance, Significant Deficiency Compliance Requirement: Reporting Criteria Education Stabilization Fund grant recipients are required to submit an annual performance report with data on expenditures, planned expenditures, subrecipients, and uses of funds. The District, as a subrecipient of the Arizona Department of Education (ADE), fulfills this requirement through completion of ADE's LEA Uses of ESSER I, II & III Report (ESSER Report). Condition The District did not maintain adequate supporting documentation for various data included in the ESSER Report submitted to ADE. Cause The District did not have sufficient review procedures in place to ensure the ESSER Report was sufficiently supported, and/or did not maintain documentation utilized when the ESSER Report was prepared. Effect The District was unable to accurately and fully support the data submitted on the ESSER Report. Context The data maintained by the District to support the allocation of costs to specific object codes and expenditure categories for ESSER II and ESSER III did not agree to the amounts reported to ADE. However, the total amounts expended for ESSER II and ESSER III were consistent with the District's accounting records. The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendation The District should ensure that accurate federal reports are prepared and that proper supporting documentation is maintained for all amounts indicated on such reports. Views Of Responsible Officials See Corrective Action Plan.
Finding Number: 2024‐002 Repeat Finding: No Program Name/Assistance Listing Title: COVID‐19 Education Stabilization Fund Assistance Listing Numbers: 84.425D, 84.425U Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Education Federal Award Numbers: S425D210038, S425U210038 Pass‐Through Agency: Arizona Department of Education Questioned Costs: N/A Type of Finding: Noncompliance, Significant Deficiency Compliance Requirement: Reporting Criteria Education Stabilization Fund grant recipients are required to submit an annual performance report with data on expenditures, planned expenditures, subrecipients, and uses of funds. The District, as a subrecipient of the Arizona Department of Education (ADE), fulfills this requirement through completion of ADE's LEA Uses of ESSER I, II & III Report (ESSER Report). Condition The District did not maintain adequate supporting documentation for various data included in the ESSER Report submitted to ADE. Cause The District did not have sufficient review procedures in place to ensure the ESSER Report was sufficiently supported, and/or did not maintain documentation utilized when the ESSER Report was prepared. Effect The District was unable to accurately and fully support the data submitted on the ESSER Report. Context The data maintained by the District to support the allocation of costs to specific object codes and expenditure categories for ESSER II and ESSER III did not agree to the amounts reported to ADE. However, the total amounts expended for ESSER II and ESSER III were consistent with the District's accounting records. The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendation The District should ensure that accurate federal reports are prepared and that proper supporting documentation is maintained for all amounts indicated on such reports. Views Of Responsible Officials See Corrective Action Plan.
Finding Number: 2024‐001 Repeat Finding: No Program Name/Assistance Listing Title: Child Nutrition Cluster Assistance Listing Numbers: 10.553, 10.555, 10.559 Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Agriculture Federal Award Numbers: 6AZ300400, 7AZ300AZ3 Pass‐Through Agency: Arizona Department of Education Questioned Costs: $58,433 Type of Finding: Noncompliance, Significant Deficiency Compliance Requirement: Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Criteria Under 2 CFR §200.303, the District is required to establish and maintain effective internal controls over the federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the District is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award. Additionally, 2 CFR §200.439 requires capital expenditures for special purpose equipment with a unit cost of $5,000 or more to have the prior written approval of the Federal awarding agency or pass‐through entity. This includes ensuring a Capital Expenditure Pre‐Approval Request Form is submitted to Arizona Department of Education (ADE) for approval prior to purchasing equipment that is not included on ADE's Food and Nutrition Service approved equipment list. Condition The District did not submit a Capital Expenditure Pre‐Approval Request Form to ADE for approval prior to purchasing equipment items not on the ADE Pre‐Approved Capital Equipment list. Cause The District was unaware that it was required to get pre‐approval from ADE for this type of purchase. Effect The District charged unallowable costs to the program. Context The District purchased two software systems related to the CNC POS for $20,920 and $29,692, and one garbage disposal for $7,821, without submitting a Capital Expenditure Pre‐Approval Request Form to ADE for approval prior to purchasing items not on the ADE Pre‐Approved Capital Equipment list. The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendation Management should review all transactions to ensure that program costs are allowable and in adherence to applicable federal requirements. Views of Responsible Officials See Corrective Action Plan.
Finding Number: 2024‐001 Repeat Finding: No Program Name/Assistance Listing Title: Child Nutrition Cluster Assistance Listing Numbers: 10.553, 10.555, 10.559 Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Agriculture Federal Award Numbers: 6AZ300400, 7AZ300AZ3 Pass‐Through Agency: Arizona Department of Education Questioned Costs: $58,433 Type of Finding: Noncompliance, Significant Deficiency Compliance Requirement: Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Criteria Under 2 CFR §200.303, the District is required to establish and maintain effective internal controls over the federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the District is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award. Additionally, 2 CFR §200.439 requires capital expenditures for special purpose equipment with a unit cost of $5,000 or more to have the prior written approval of the Federal awarding agency or pass‐through entity. This includes ensuring a Capital Expenditure Pre‐Approval Request Form is submitted to Arizona Department of Education (ADE) for approval prior to purchasing equipment that is not included on ADE's Food and Nutrition Service approved equipment list. Condition The District did not submit a Capital Expenditure Pre‐Approval Request Form to ADE for approval prior to purchasing equipment items not on the ADE Pre‐Approved Capital Equipment list. Cause The District was unaware that it was required to get pre‐approval from ADE for this type of purchase. Effect The District charged unallowable costs to the program. Context The District purchased two software systems related to the CNC POS for $20,920 and $29,692, and one garbage disposal for $7,821, without submitting a Capital Expenditure Pre‐Approval Request Form to ADE for approval prior to purchasing items not on the ADE Pre‐Approved Capital Equipment list. The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendation Management should review all transactions to ensure that program costs are allowable and in adherence to applicable federal requirements. Views of Responsible Officials See Corrective Action Plan.
Finding Number: 2024‐001 Repeat Finding: No Program Name/Assistance Listing Title: Child Nutrition Cluster Assistance Listing Numbers: 10.553, 10.555, 10.559 Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Agriculture Federal Award Numbers: 6AZ300400, 7AZ300AZ3 Pass‐Through Agency: Arizona Department of Education Questioned Costs: $58,433 Type of Finding: Noncompliance, Significant Deficiency Compliance Requirement: Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Criteria Under 2 CFR §200.303, the District is required to establish and maintain effective internal controls over the federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the District is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award. Additionally, 2 CFR §200.439 requires capital expenditures for special purpose equipment with a unit cost of $5,000 or more to have the prior written approval of the Federal awarding agency or pass‐through entity. This includes ensuring a Capital Expenditure Pre‐Approval Request Form is submitted to Arizona Department of Education (ADE) for approval prior to purchasing equipment that is not included on ADE's Food and Nutrition Service approved equipment list. Condition The District did not submit a Capital Expenditure Pre‐Approval Request Form to ADE for approval prior to purchasing equipment items not on the ADE Pre‐Approved Capital Equipment list. Cause The District was unaware that it was required to get pre‐approval from ADE for this type of purchase. Effect The District charged unallowable costs to the program. Context The District purchased two software systems related to the CNC POS for $20,920 and $29,692, and one garbage disposal for $7,821, without submitting a Capital Expenditure Pre‐Approval Request Form to ADE for approval prior to purchasing items not on the ADE Pre‐Approved Capital Equipment list. The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendation Management should review all transactions to ensure that program costs are allowable and in adherence to applicable federal requirements. Views of Responsible Officials See Corrective Action Plan.
Finding Number: 2024‐001 Repeat Finding: No Program Name/Assistance Listing Title: Child Nutrition Cluster Assistance Listing Numbers: 10.553, 10.555, 10.559 Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Agriculture Federal Award Numbers: 6AZ300400, 7AZ300AZ3 Pass‐Through Agency: Arizona Department of Education Questioned Costs: $58,433 Type of Finding: Noncompliance, Significant Deficiency Compliance Requirement: Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Criteria Under 2 CFR §200.303, the District is required to establish and maintain effective internal controls over the federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the District is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award. Additionally, 2 CFR §200.439 requires capital expenditures for special purpose equipment with a unit cost of $5,000 or more to have the prior written approval of the Federal awarding agency or pass‐through entity. This includes ensuring a Capital Expenditure Pre‐Approval Request Form is submitted to Arizona Department of Education (ADE) for approval prior to purchasing equipment that is not included on ADE's Food and Nutrition Service approved equipment list. Condition The District did not submit a Capital Expenditure Pre‐Approval Request Form to ADE for approval prior to purchasing equipment items not on the ADE Pre‐Approved Capital Equipment list. Cause The District was unaware that it was required to get pre‐approval from ADE for this type of purchase. Effect The District charged unallowable costs to the program. Context The District purchased two software systems related to the CNC POS for $20,920 and $29,692, and one garbage disposal for $7,821, without submitting a Capital Expenditure Pre‐Approval Request Form to ADE for approval prior to purchasing items not on the ADE Pre‐Approved Capital Equipment list. The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendation Management should review all transactions to ensure that program costs are allowable and in adherence to applicable federal requirements. Views of Responsible Officials See Corrective Action Plan.
Finding Number: 2024‐002 Repeat Finding: No Program Name/Assistance Listing Title: COVID‐19 Education Stabilization Fund Assistance Listing Numbers: 84.425D, 84.425U Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Education Federal Award Numbers: S425D210038, S425U210038 Pass‐Through Agency: Arizona Department of Education Questioned Costs: N/A Type of Finding: Noncompliance, Significant Deficiency Compliance Requirement: Reporting Criteria Education Stabilization Fund grant recipients are required to submit an annual performance report with data on expenditures, planned expenditures, subrecipients, and uses of funds. The District, as a subrecipient of the Arizona Department of Education (ADE), fulfills this requirement through completion of ADE's LEA Uses of ESSER I, II & III Report (ESSER Report). Condition The District did not maintain adequate supporting documentation for various data included in the ESSER Report submitted to ADE. Cause The District did not have sufficient review procedures in place to ensure the ESSER Report was sufficiently supported, and/or did not maintain documentation utilized when the ESSER Report was prepared. Effect The District was unable to accurately and fully support the data submitted on the ESSER Report. Context The data maintained by the District to support the allocation of costs to specific object codes and expenditure categories for ESSER II and ESSER III did not agree to the amounts reported to ADE. However, the total amounts expended for ESSER II and ESSER III were consistent with the District's accounting records. The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendation The District should ensure that accurate federal reports are prepared and that proper supporting documentation is maintained for all amounts indicated on such reports. Views Of Responsible Officials See Corrective Action Plan.
Finding Number: 2024‐002 Repeat Finding: No Program Name/Assistance Listing Title: COVID‐19 Education Stabilization Fund Assistance Listing Numbers: 84.425D, 84.425U Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Education Federal Award Numbers: S425D210038, S425U210038 Pass‐Through Agency: Arizona Department of Education Questioned Costs: N/A Type of Finding: Noncompliance, Significant Deficiency Compliance Requirement: Reporting Criteria Education Stabilization Fund grant recipients are required to submit an annual performance report with data on expenditures, planned expenditures, subrecipients, and uses of funds. The District, as a subrecipient of the Arizona Department of Education (ADE), fulfills this requirement through completion of ADE's LEA Uses of ESSER I, II & III Report (ESSER Report). Condition The District did not maintain adequate supporting documentation for various data included in the ESSER Report submitted to ADE. Cause The District did not have sufficient review procedures in place to ensure the ESSER Report was sufficiently supported, and/or did not maintain documentation utilized when the ESSER Report was prepared. Effect The District was unable to accurately and fully support the data submitted on the ESSER Report. Context The data maintained by the District to support the allocation of costs to specific object codes and expenditure categories for ESSER II and ESSER III did not agree to the amounts reported to ADE. However, the total amounts expended for ESSER II and ESSER III were consistent with the District's accounting records. The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendation The District should ensure that accurate federal reports are prepared and that proper supporting documentation is maintained for all amounts indicated on such reports. Views Of Responsible Officials See Corrective Action Plan.