Audit 357546

FY End
2024-09-30
Total Expended
$1.39M
Findings
8
Programs
1
Organization: US Water Alliance (WA)
Year: 2024 Accepted: 2025-05-29

Organization Exclusion Status:

Checking exclusion status...

Findings

ID Ref Severity Repeat Requirement
561892 2024-001 Significant Deficiency - I
561893 2024-002 Significant Deficiency - L
561894 2024-003 Significant Deficiency - L
561895 2024-004 Significant Deficiency - M
1138334 2024-001 Significant Deficiency - I
1138335 2024-002 Significant Deficiency - L
1138336 2024-003 Significant Deficiency - L
1138337 2024-004 Significant Deficiency - M

Programs

ALN Program Spent Major Findings
66.203 Environmental Finance Center Grants $11,655 Yes 0

Contacts

Name Title Type
HXHWMK79K371 Shaquina Davis Auditee
2029382500 Steve Marconi Auditor
No contacts on file

Notes to SEFA

Title: 1. Basis of Presentation Accounting Policies: Expenditures reported on the SEFA are reported on the accrual basis of accounting. Such expenditures are recognized following the cost principles contained in the Uniform Guidance, wherein certain types of expenditures are not allowable or are limited as to reimbursement. De Minimis Rate Used: Y Rate Explanation: The Alliance elected to use the 10% de minimis indirect cost rate, as allowed under the Uniform Guidance. The accompanying schedule of expenditures of federal awards (SEFA) includes the federal award activity of the Alliance under the programs of the federal government for the year ended September 30, 2024. The information in the SEFA is presented in accordance with Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance). Because the SEFA presents only a selected portion of the operations of the Alliance, it is not intended to, and does not, present the financial position, changes in net assets, or cash flows of the Alliance.
Title: 2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies Accounting Policies: Expenditures reported on the SEFA are reported on the accrual basis of accounting. Such expenditures are recognized following the cost principles contained in the Uniform Guidance, wherein certain types of expenditures are not allowable or are limited as to reimbursement. De Minimis Rate Used: Y Rate Explanation: The Alliance elected to use the 10% de minimis indirect cost rate, as allowed under the Uniform Guidance. Expenditures reported on the SEFA are reported on the accrual basis of accounting. Such expenditures are recognized following the cost principles contained in the Uniform Guidance, wherein certain types of expenditures are not allowable or are limited as to reimbursement.
Title: 3. Indirect Cost Rates Accounting Policies: Expenditures reported on the SEFA are reported on the accrual basis of accounting. Such expenditures are recognized following the cost principles contained in the Uniform Guidance, wherein certain types of expenditures are not allowable or are limited as to reimbursement. De Minimis Rate Used: Y Rate Explanation: The Alliance elected to use the 10% de minimis indirect cost rate, as allowed under the Uniform Guidance. The Alliance elected to use the 10% de minimis indirect cost rate, as allowed under the Uniform Guidance.

Finding Details

Criteria: 2 CFR Section 200.318 requires that the non-federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with state, local, and tribal laws and regulations and the standards of this section, for the acquisition of property or services required under a federal award or subaward. The non-federal entity’s documented procurement procedures must conform to the procurement standard identified in §§ 200.317 through 200.327 and must be adhered to. Condition and context: During testing of the Alliance’s controls on compliance over procurement and suspension and debarment, we identified the Alliance did not have all the needed documentation around the suspension and debarment check. Cause: Controls and processes were not effectively designed to ensure there was all proper documentation around the suspension and debarment check. Effect: The Alliance was not fully in compliance with the procurement and suspension and debarment check requirements of the Uniform Guidance. Questioned Costs: None. Identification as a Repeat Finding: N/A. Recommendation: We recommend that the Alliance review its current processes and controls over procurement and suspension and debarment to ensure all required documentation is retained and available. Views of Responsible Official: Management agrees with the finding. See Corrective Action Plan.
Criteria: 2 CFR Section 200.328 requires that the non-federal entity must submit the Federal Financial Report (SF-425) no later than 30 days after the end of a quarterly or semiannually reporting period (or 90 days for annual reporting periods). Condition and context: During testing of the Alliance’s compliance over reporting, we identified the Alliance did not submit the SF-425 forms timely during the year ended September 30, 2024. Cause: The Alliance’s controls and processes were not effectively designed to ensure all reporting requirements are executed timely. Effect: The Alliance was not fully in compliance with the reporting requirements of the Uniform Guidance. Questioned Costs: None. Identification as a Repeat Finding: N/A. Recommendation: We recommend that the Alliance implement internal controls such as a compliance calendar and designated review procedures to ensure that all federal reporting requirements, including SF-425 filings, are completed accurately and on time. Views of Responsible Official: Management agrees with the finding. See Corrective Action Plan.
Criteria: Per 2 CFR Section 170, the prime recipients of federal grants that make subawards of $30,000 or more are required to report specific information about those subawards in the Federal Subaward Reporting System (FSRS), that is, the Federal Funding Accountability and Transparency Act (FFATA) report, by the end of the month following the month in which the subaward was obligated. Condition and context: During testing of the Alliance’s compliance with FFATA reporting requirements, we identified the Alliance did not submit FFATA reports timely. Cause: The Alliance’s controls and processes were not effectively designed to ensure all reporting requirements are executed timely. Effect: The Alliance was not in compliance with the reporting requirements of the Uniform Guidance. Failure to report subawards in a timely manner may affect the government’s ability to provide adequate oversight and may be considered noncompliance with award terms and conditions. Questioned Costs: None. Identification as a Repeat Finding: N/A. Recommendation: We recommend that the Alliance establish formal policies and procedures to ensure compliance with FFATA reporting requirements, including identifying applicable subawards and submitting reports through FSRS in a timely manner. Views of Responsible Official:Management agrees with the finding. See Corrective Action Plan.
Criteria: Per 2 CFR Section 200.214 and Appendix II to Part 200, non-federal entities are prohibited from contracting with or making subawards to parties that are suspended or debarred. Entities must verify that a subrecipient is not suspended or debarred at the time of the award, either by checking the SAM.gov exclusion list, collecting a certification or including appropriate contract clauses. Condition and context: During testing of the Alliance’s controls on compliance over subrecipient monitoring and suspension and debarment, we identified the Alliance did not have all the needed documentation around the suspension and debarment check prior to making a subaward. Cause: Controls and processes were not effectively designed to ensure there was all proper documentation around the suspension and debarment check prior to issuing subawards. Effect: The Alliance was not fully in compliance with the subrecipient monitoring and suspension and debarment check requirements of the Uniform Guidance. Questioned Costs: None. Identification as a Repeat Finding: N/A. Recommendation: We recommend that the Alliance review its current processes and controls over subrecipient monitoring and suspension and debarment to ensure all required documentation is retained and available. Views of Responsible Official: Management agrees with the finding. See Corrective Action Plan.
Criteria: 2 CFR Section 200.318 requires that the non-federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with state, local, and tribal laws and regulations and the standards of this section, for the acquisition of property or services required under a federal award or subaward. The non-federal entity’s documented procurement procedures must conform to the procurement standard identified in §§ 200.317 through 200.327 and must be adhered to. Condition and context: During testing of the Alliance’s controls on compliance over procurement and suspension and debarment, we identified the Alliance did not have all the needed documentation around the suspension and debarment check. Cause: Controls and processes were not effectively designed to ensure there was all proper documentation around the suspension and debarment check. Effect: The Alliance was not fully in compliance with the procurement and suspension and debarment check requirements of the Uniform Guidance. Questioned Costs: None. Identification as a Repeat Finding: N/A. Recommendation: We recommend that the Alliance review its current processes and controls over procurement and suspension and debarment to ensure all required documentation is retained and available. Views of Responsible Official: Management agrees with the finding. See Corrective Action Plan.
Criteria: 2 CFR Section 200.328 requires that the non-federal entity must submit the Federal Financial Report (SF-425) no later than 30 days after the end of a quarterly or semiannually reporting period (or 90 days for annual reporting periods). Condition and context: During testing of the Alliance’s compliance over reporting, we identified the Alliance did not submit the SF-425 forms timely during the year ended September 30, 2024. Cause: The Alliance’s controls and processes were not effectively designed to ensure all reporting requirements are executed timely. Effect: The Alliance was not fully in compliance with the reporting requirements of the Uniform Guidance. Questioned Costs: None. Identification as a Repeat Finding: N/A. Recommendation: We recommend that the Alliance implement internal controls such as a compliance calendar and designated review procedures to ensure that all federal reporting requirements, including SF-425 filings, are completed accurately and on time. Views of Responsible Official: Management agrees with the finding. See Corrective Action Plan.
Criteria: Per 2 CFR Section 170, the prime recipients of federal grants that make subawards of $30,000 or more are required to report specific information about those subawards in the Federal Subaward Reporting System (FSRS), that is, the Federal Funding Accountability and Transparency Act (FFATA) report, by the end of the month following the month in which the subaward was obligated. Condition and context: During testing of the Alliance’s compliance with FFATA reporting requirements, we identified the Alliance did not submit FFATA reports timely. Cause: The Alliance’s controls and processes were not effectively designed to ensure all reporting requirements are executed timely. Effect: The Alliance was not in compliance with the reporting requirements of the Uniform Guidance. Failure to report subawards in a timely manner may affect the government’s ability to provide adequate oversight and may be considered noncompliance with award terms and conditions. Questioned Costs: None. Identification as a Repeat Finding: N/A. Recommendation: We recommend that the Alliance establish formal policies and procedures to ensure compliance with FFATA reporting requirements, including identifying applicable subawards and submitting reports through FSRS in a timely manner. Views of Responsible Official:Management agrees with the finding. See Corrective Action Plan.
Criteria: Per 2 CFR Section 200.214 and Appendix II to Part 200, non-federal entities are prohibited from contracting with or making subawards to parties that are suspended or debarred. Entities must verify that a subrecipient is not suspended or debarred at the time of the award, either by checking the SAM.gov exclusion list, collecting a certification or including appropriate contract clauses. Condition and context: During testing of the Alliance’s controls on compliance over subrecipient monitoring and suspension and debarment, we identified the Alliance did not have all the needed documentation around the suspension and debarment check prior to making a subaward. Cause: Controls and processes were not effectively designed to ensure there was all proper documentation around the suspension and debarment check prior to issuing subawards. Effect: The Alliance was not fully in compliance with the subrecipient monitoring and suspension and debarment check requirements of the Uniform Guidance. Questioned Costs: None. Identification as a Repeat Finding: N/A. Recommendation: We recommend that the Alliance review its current processes and controls over subrecipient monitoring and suspension and debarment to ensure all required documentation is retained and available. Views of Responsible Official: Management agrees with the finding. See Corrective Action Plan.