Audit 357301

FY End
2024-12-31
Total Expended
$12.85M
Findings
2
Programs
3
Year: 2024 Accepted: 2025-05-28
Auditor: K&c CPAS

Organization Exclusion Status:

Checking exclusion status...

Findings

ID Ref Severity Repeat Requirement
561666 2024-001 Material Weakness - N
1138108 2024-001 Material Weakness - N

Programs

ALN Program Spent Major Findings
66.468 Drinking Water State Revolving Fund $11.31M Yes 0
15.514 Reclamation States Emergency Drought Relief $722,666 Yes 1
97.047 Bric: Building Resilient Infrastructure and Communities $108,762 - 0

Contacts

Name Title Type
P1PSCPP1JL17 Austin Ballard Auditee
8019552206 Steve Rowley Auditor
No contacts on file

Notes to SEFA

Accounting Policies: NOTE 1: BASIS OF PRESENTATION: The accompanying schedule of expenditures of federal awards (the Schedule) includes the federal award activity of Granger-Hunter Improvement District (the District) under programs of the federal government for the year ended December 31, 2022. The information in this Schedule is presented in accordance with the requirements of Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200 Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance). Because the Schedule presents only a selected portion of the operations of the District, it is not intended to and does not present the financial position, change in net position, or cash flows of the District. NOTE 2: SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES Expenditures reported on the Schedule are reported on the accrual basis of accounting. Such expenditures are recognized following the cost principles contained in the Uniform Guidance, wherein certain types of expenditures are not allowable or are limited as to reimbursement. NOTE 3: INDIRECT COST RATE The District has elected not to use the 10% de minimus indirect cost rate allowed under the Uniform Guidance. De Minimis Rate Used: N Rate Explanation: N/A

Finding Details

2024-001 – Special Tests and Provisions – Wage Rate Requirements Criteria: Certified payroll records should be submitted by the contractor each week as required by the Wage Rate Requirements. Conditions: The District contracted with a consulting engineering firm to oversee the contractor’s work, including compliance with Federal requirements. Neither the Consultant, nor the District requested certified payroll records from the Contractor as work progressed, and the Contractor did not prepare those certified payroll reports, as required by the Wage Rate Requirements. Cause: This appears to be caused by vague language in the agreements with both project management engineering firm, and the Contractor regarding the federal requirements needed to be followed. Additionally, the District did not explicitly include the Wage Rate Requirements as part of their oversight of the Contractor’s compliance with federal requirements. Effect: As a result, we were unable to test whether the District complied with the Wage Rate Requirements. Context: As indicated previously, this appears to be an isolated instance regarding this contract, as other federal award programs tested in the current and previous years have included the proper language in the contracts, and evidence observed indicates that the Wage Rate Requirements were followed in those other instances. Once notified of the lack of oversight, the District worked to include amendments to its agreements, and make assignments to ensure Wage Rate Requirement are followed on any current and future contracts. There was no similar finding in prior years or in other federal programs tested. Recommendation: We recommended the District ensure agreements with contractors and agreements with oversight engineering firms include explicit language regarding Wage Rate Requirements, and assign individuals with responsibility for ensuring such oversight activities take place. Corrective action plan – The District’s response to the finding is included in the corrective action plan, which can be found on the following page.
2024-001 – Special Tests and Provisions – Wage Rate Requirements Criteria: Certified payroll records should be submitted by the contractor each week as required by the Wage Rate Requirements. Conditions: The District contracted with a consulting engineering firm to oversee the contractor’s work, including compliance with Federal requirements. Neither the Consultant, nor the District requested certified payroll records from the Contractor as work progressed, and the Contractor did not prepare those certified payroll reports, as required by the Wage Rate Requirements. Cause: This appears to be caused by vague language in the agreements with both project management engineering firm, and the Contractor regarding the federal requirements needed to be followed. Additionally, the District did not explicitly include the Wage Rate Requirements as part of their oversight of the Contractor’s compliance with federal requirements. Effect: As a result, we were unable to test whether the District complied with the Wage Rate Requirements. Context: As indicated previously, this appears to be an isolated instance regarding this contract, as other federal award programs tested in the current and previous years have included the proper language in the contracts, and evidence observed indicates that the Wage Rate Requirements were followed in those other instances. Once notified of the lack of oversight, the District worked to include amendments to its agreements, and make assignments to ensure Wage Rate Requirement are followed on any current and future contracts. There was no similar finding in prior years or in other federal programs tested. Recommendation: We recommended the District ensure agreements with contractors and agreements with oversight engineering firms include explicit language regarding Wage Rate Requirements, and assign individuals with responsibility for ensuring such oversight activities take place. Corrective action plan – The District’s response to the finding is included in the corrective action plan, which can be found on the following page.