Audit 357287

FY End
2024-09-30
Total Expended
$35.69M
Findings
2
Programs
25
Year: 2024 Accepted: 2025-05-28

Organization Exclusion Status:

Checking exclusion status...

Findings

ID Ref Severity Repeat Requirement
561662 2024-001 Significant Deficiency - G
1138104 2024-001 Significant Deficiency - G

Programs

ALN Program Spent Major Findings
20.106 Airport Improvement Program, Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act Programs, and Covid-19 Airports Programs $10.13M - 0
14.218 Community Development Block Grants/entitlement Grants $2.82M Yes 0
20.507 Federal Transit Formula Grants $1.86M - 0
20.933 National Infrastructure Investments $1.46M Yes 1
21.027 Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds $1.32M Yes 0
14.239 Home Investment Partnerships Program $694,184 - 0
97.067 Homeland Security Grant Program $353,012 - 0
20.513 Enhanced Mobility of Seniors and Individuals with Disabilities $282,302 - 0
20.526 Buses and Bus Facilities Formula, Competitive, and Low Or No Emissions Programs $243,394 - 0
20.505 Metropolitan Transportation Planning and State and Non-Metropolitan Planning and Research $219,859 - 0
14.231 Emergency Solutions Grant Program $163,251 - 0
16.922 Equitable Sharing Program $109,115 - 0
20.600 State and Community Highway Safety $74,614 - 0
16.609 Project Safe Neighborhoods $70,688 - 0
20.509 Formula Grants for Rural Areas and Tribal Transit Program $58,546 - 0
14.905 Lead Hazard Reduction Demonstration Grant Program $52,904 - 0
20.205 Highway Planning and Construction $51,703 - 0
16.710 Public Safety Partnership and Community Policing Grants $48,719 - 0
81.041 State Energy Program $45,917 - 0
16.738 Edward Byrne Memorial Justice Assistance Grant Program $30,555 - 0
97.039 Hazard Mitigation Grant $15,905 - 0
20.616 National Priority Safety Programs $15,729 - 0
97.036 Disaster Grants - Public Assistance (presidentially Declared Disasters) $8,760 Yes 0
10.175 Farmers Market and Local Food Promotion Program $2,617 - 0
16.609 Public Safety Partnership and Community Policing Grants $1,177 - 0

Contacts

Name Title Type
HS3PRJ2R6X93 Roberta McManus Auditee
8508918413 Jeff Wolf Auditor
No contacts on file

Notes to SEFA

Title: Loans/Loan Guarantees Outstnading at year end Accounting Policies: 1) The accompanying Schedule of Federal and State Financial Assistance of Expenditures (Schedule) presents the activity of all federal programs and state projects of the City of Tallahassee for the year ended September 30, 2024. All expenditures related to federal awards and state projects received directly from federal and state agencies, as well as federal awards and state projects passed through other governmental agencies, are included in the accompanying Schedule. The information in this Schedule is presented in accordance with the requirements of Title 2, US Code of Federal Regulations Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance) and Chapter 10.550, Rules of the Florida Auditor General. 2) The Schedule was prepared on the modified accrual basis of accounting. De Minimis Rate Used: N Rate Explanation: The City chose not to use the de minimis cost rate Community Development Block Grant – Entitlement 14.218 = $503,652 Home Investment Partnerships Program 14.239 = $3,862,707
Title: Awards that included expenditures through 9/30/2023 Accounting Policies: 1) The accompanying Schedule of Federal and State Financial Assistance of Expenditures (Schedule) presents the activity of all federal programs and state projects of the City of Tallahassee for the year ended September 30, 2024. All expenditures related to federal awards and state projects received directly from federal and state agencies, as well as federal awards and state projects passed through other governmental agencies, are included in the accompanying Schedule. The information in this Schedule is presented in accordance with the requirements of Title 2, US Code of Federal Regulations Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance) and Chapter 10.550, Rules of the Florida Auditor General. 2) The Schedule was prepared on the modified accrual basis of accounting. De Minimis Rate Used: N Rate Explanation: The City chose not to use the de minimis cost rate Diaster Grants 97.036 = $2,740,484

Finding Details

Criteria: The Uniform Guidance (2 CFR Part 200) governs how federal funds are spent, including matching and cost-sharing requirements for U.S. Department of Transportation grants. Condition: The City submitted and was reimbursed for costs that exceeded the federal agencies cost share percentage at the time of reimbursement. Cause: The City was calculating eligible reimbursable grant expenses with higher cost allocation percentage. The agreement stipulated a seventy-five/twenty-five cost share allocation. The City utilized an eighty/twenty cost share allocation when completing its reimbursement request. Effect: This calculation resulted in the City being reimbursed a higher amount for eligible expenses. The higher amount reimbursed occurred during the first reimbursement request under this program. Questioned Costs: Not applicable. Recommendation: We recommend that the City strengthen internal controls to ensure that the correct cost share as stipulated by grant agreements is utilized when submitting grant reimbursement requests. We also recommend that in its next reimbursement request under this program, the City work with grantor agency to reflect the adjustment for the amount over reimbursed as of September 30, 2024 and ensure that the Federal cost share amount for the program is properly reimbursed for the remaining term of the program.
Criteria: The Uniform Guidance (2 CFR Part 200) governs how federal funds are spent, including matching and cost-sharing requirements for U.S. Department of Transportation grants. Condition: The City submitted and was reimbursed for costs that exceeded the federal agencies cost share percentage at the time of reimbursement. Cause: The City was calculating eligible reimbursable grant expenses with higher cost allocation percentage. The agreement stipulated a seventy-five/twenty-five cost share allocation. The City utilized an eighty/twenty cost share allocation when completing its reimbursement request. Effect: This calculation resulted in the City being reimbursed a higher amount for eligible expenses. The higher amount reimbursed occurred during the first reimbursement request under this program. Questioned Costs: Not applicable. Recommendation: We recommend that the City strengthen internal controls to ensure that the correct cost share as stipulated by grant agreements is utilized when submitting grant reimbursement requests. We also recommend that in its next reimbursement request under this program, the City work with grantor agency to reflect the adjustment for the amount over reimbursed as of September 30, 2024 and ensure that the Federal cost share amount for the program is properly reimbursed for the remaining term of the program.