Audit 352633

FY End
2022-12-31
Total Expended
$2.79M
Findings
14
Programs
3
Year: 2022 Accepted: 2025-04-03

Organization Exclusion Status:

Checking exclusion status...

Findings

ID Ref Severity Repeat Requirement
553991 2022-004 Significant Deficiency Yes A
553992 2022-005 Significant Deficiency - M
553993 2022-006 Significant Deficiency Yes A
553994 2022-007 Significant Deficiency Yes L
553995 2022-008 Material Weakness - M
553996 2022-009 Material Weakness Yes M
553997 2022-010 Material Weakness Yes B
1130433 2022-004 Significant Deficiency Yes A
1130434 2022-005 Significant Deficiency - M
1130435 2022-006 Significant Deficiency Yes A
1130436 2022-007 Significant Deficiency Yes L
1130437 2022-008 Material Weakness - M
1130438 2022-009 Material Weakness Yes M
1130439 2022-010 Material Weakness Yes B

Programs

ALN Program Spent Major Findings
11.473 Office for Coastal Management $685,222 Yes 5
10.698 State & Private Forestry Cooperative Fire Assistance $1,249 Yes 0
10.664 Cooperative Forestry Assistance $-86,652 Yes 0

Contacts

Name Title Type
CXAGWJEL5KK7 Joel Rusco Auditee
2795994059 Ryan McDonald Auditor
No contacts on file

Notes to SEFA

Title: Basis of Presentation Accounting Policies: Expenditures reported on the Schedule are reported on the accrual basis of accounting, except for subrecipient expenditures, which are recorded on a cash basis. Such expenditures are recognized following the cost principles contained in Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 230, Cost Principles for Non-profit Organizations, wherein certain types of expenditures are not allowable or are limited as to reimbursement. De Minimis Rate Used: N Rate Explanation: CFSC has not elected to use the 10% de minimis indirect cost rate allowed under the Uniform Guidance. The accompanying schedule of expenditures of federal awards (the Schedule) includes the federal grant activity of California Fire Safe Council, Inc. (CFSC) under programs of the federal government for the year ended December 31, 2022. The information in this Schedule is presented in accordance with the requirements of Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance). Because the Schedule presents only a selected portion of the operations of CFSC, it is not intended to and does not present the financial position, changes in net assets, or cash flows of CFSC.
Title: Summary of Significant Accounting Policies Accounting Policies: Expenditures reported on the Schedule are reported on the accrual basis of accounting, except for subrecipient expenditures, which are recorded on a cash basis. Such expenditures are recognized following the cost principles contained in Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 230, Cost Principles for Non-profit Organizations, wherein certain types of expenditures are not allowable or are limited as to reimbursement. De Minimis Rate Used: N Rate Explanation: CFSC has not elected to use the 10% de minimis indirect cost rate allowed under the Uniform Guidance. Expenditures reported on the Schedule are reported on the accrual basis of accounting, except for subrecipient expenditures, which are recorded on a cash basis. Such expenditures are recognized following the cost principles contained in Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 230, Cost Principles for Non-profit Organizations, wherein certain types of expenditures are not allowable or are limited as to reimbursement.
Title: Subrecipients Accounting Policies: Expenditures reported on the Schedule are reported on the accrual basis of accounting, except for subrecipient expenditures, which are recorded on a cash basis. Such expenditures are recognized following the cost principles contained in Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 230, Cost Principles for Non-profit Organizations, wherein certain types of expenditures are not allowable or are limited as to reimbursement. De Minimis Rate Used: N Rate Explanation: CFSC has not elected to use the 10% de minimis indirect cost rate allowed under the Uniform Guidance. Of the federal expenditures presented in the Schedule, CFSC provided federal awards to subrecipients as follows: Federal Financial Amounts Assistance Provided to Program Title Number Subrecipients Cooperative Forestry Assistance 10.664 $ 1,585,577 Office for Coastal Management 11.473 565,625 Subtotal - Payments per SEFA 2,151,202 Subrecipient Payments on Non-Federal Awards 2,617,884 Total per the Financial Statements $ 4,769,086
Title: Indirect Cost Rate Accounting Policies: Expenditures reported on the Schedule are reported on the accrual basis of accounting, except for subrecipient expenditures, which are recorded on a cash basis. Such expenditures are recognized following the cost principles contained in Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 230, Cost Principles for Non-profit Organizations, wherein certain types of expenditures are not allowable or are limited as to reimbursement. De Minimis Rate Used: N Rate Explanation: CFSC has not elected to use the 10% de minimis indirect cost rate allowed under the Uniform Guidance. CFSC has not elected to use the 10% de minimis indirect cost rate allowed under the Uniform Guidance.

Finding Details

Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Agriculture Forest Service Federal Program Name: Cooperative Forestry Assistance - Pass-Through Agency: N/A Assistance Listing Number: 10.664 Federal Award Identification Year: 2021 Award Period: 09/01/21-08/31/26 Type of Finding: Other Matters - Significant Deficiency in Internal Control Criteria: 2 CFR 200.403(a) - Except where otherwise authorized by statute, costs must meet the following general criteria in order to be allowable under Federal awards: Be necessary and reasonable for the performance of the Federal award and be allocable thereto under these principles. Condition: For one payroll sample that was selected, the amount of time charged to the grant was greater than the amount of time work was performed for the grant. As such, the program was overcharged. Context: A nonstatistical sample of 25 out of > 250 payroll entries were selected for testing for the Cooperative Forestry Assistance program. The condition noted above was identified during our procedures over the CFSC’s allowable costs provisions. Effect: CFSC did not identify the error to be able to make the appropriate corrections before receiving reimbursement for incorrect payroll related expenditures. Cause: CFSC did not consistently ensure that the hours worked by each employee related to the federal program were accurate applying the cost to the grant. Repeat Finding: The finding is a repeat finding. Recommendation: We recommend that management strengthen its current policies and procedures to ensure that all payroll amounts applied to the grant were for actual hours worked based on employee timesheets. Management’s Views: See separate corrective action plan.
Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Agriculture Forest Service Federal Program Name: Cooperative Forestry Assistance - Pass-Through Agency: N/A Assistance Listing Number: 10.664 Federal Award Identification Year: 2021 Award Period: 09/01/21-08/31/26 Type of Finding: Other Matters - Significant Deficiency in Internal Control Criteria: 2 CFR 200.403(a) - When a non-federal entity enters into a covered transaction with an entity at a lower tier, the non-federal entity must verify that the entity, as defined in 2 CFR section 180.995 and agency adopting regulations, is not suspended or debarred or otherwise excluded from participating in the transaction. Condition: For two subrecipient samples that were selected, verification of subrecipient's suspension or debarment status was not verified until after the subaward agreement was effective. Context: A nonstatistical sample of 6 out of 20 subrecipients were selected for testing for the Cooperative Forestry Assistance program. The condition noted above was identified during our procedures over CFSC’s subrecipients. Effect: CFSC did not verify suspension or debarment status timely which could result in naming a subrecipient as an award recipient who is potentially suspended or debarred. Cause: CFSC did not consistently ensure that Suspension or Debarment status was verified timely before naming the subrecipients tested as award recipients. Repeat Finding: The finding is not a repeat finding. Recommendation: We recommend that management strengthen its current policies and procedures to ensure that Suspension and Debarment Status is verified for each subrecipient applicant during its pre-award subrecipient screening process. Management’s Views: See separate corrective action plan.
Federal Agency: United States Department of Commerce Federal Program Name: Office for Coastal Management Assistance Listing Number: 11.473 Federal Award Identification Year: 2020 Pass-Through Agency: National Fish and Wildlife Grant Agreement Award Period: 9/1/20-08/31/23 Type of Finding: Other Matters - Significant Deficiency in Internal Control Criteria: 2 CFR 200.403(a) - Except where otherwise authorized by statute, costs must meet the following general criteria in order to be allowable under Federal awards: Be necessary and reasonable for the performance of the Federal award and be allocable thereto under these principles. Condition: For two payroll samples that were selected, the amount of time charged to the grant was greater than the amount of time work was performed for the grant. As such, the program was overcharged. Context: A nonstatistical sample of 8 out of 48 payroll entries were selected for testing for the Office for Coastal Management program. The condition noted above was identified during our procedures over the CFSC’s allowable costs provisions. Effect: CFSC did not identify the error to be able to make the appropriate corrections before receiving reimbursement for incorrect payroll related expenditures. Cause: CFSC did not consistently ensure that the hours worked by each employee related to the federal program were accurate applying the cost to the grant. Repeat Finding: The finding is a repeat finding. Recommendation: We recommend that management strengthen its current policies and procedures to ensure that all payroll amounts applied to the grant were for actual hours worked based on employee timesheets. Management’s Views: See separate corrective action plan.
Federal Agency: United States Department of Commerce Federal Program Name: Office for Coastal Management Assistance Listing Number: 11.473 Federal Award Identification Year: 2020 Pass-Through Agency: National Fish and Wildlife Grant Agreement Award Period: 9/1/20-08/31/23 Type of Finding: Other Matters - Significant Deficiency in Internal Control Criteria: 2 CFR 200.328 - Unless otherwise approved by OMB, the Federal awarding agency must solicit only the OMB-approved governmentwide data elements for collection of financial information (at time of publication the Federal Financial Report or such future, OMB approved, governmentwide data elements available from the OMB designated standards lead. This information must be collected with the frequency required by the terms and conditions of the Federal award, but no less frequently than annually nor more frequently than quarterly except in unusual circumstances, for example where more frequent reporting is necessary for the effective monitoring of the Federal award or could significantly affect program outcomes, and preferably in coordination with performance reporting. 2 CFR 200.329(c)(1) -Requirements state that the non-Federal entity must submit performance reports at the interval required by the Federal awarding agency or passthrough entity to best inform improvements in program outcomes and productivity. Condition: For one of the two reports selected for testing, CFSC did not submit the reports to the National Fish and Wildlife Foundation by the required date. Context: A nonstatistical sample of 2 out of 4 required reports were selected for testing for the Office for Coastal Management program. The condition noted above was identified during our procedures over the CFSC’s reporting requirements. Effect: CFSC did not submit required reports in a timely manner, increasing the risk of noncompliance. Cause: CFSC’s procedures did not consistently ensure that the required reports were submitted on a timely basis. Repeat Finding: The finding is a repeat finding. Recommendation: We recommend that management modify and strengthen its current policies and procedures to ensure that all required reports are submitted on a timely basis to the appropriate Federal Agency or Pass-Through Entity. Management’s Views: See separate corrective action plan.
Federal Agency: United States Department of Commerce Federal Program Name: Office for Coastal Management Assistance Listing Number: 11.473 Federal Award Identification Year: 2020 Award Period: 9/1/20-08/31/23 Type of Finding: Material Weakness in Internal Control over Compliance and Material Noncompliance (Modified Opinion) Criteria: 2 CFR 200.403(a) - When a non-federal entity enters into a covered transaction with an entity at a lower tier, the non-federal entity must verify that the entity, as defined in 2 CFR section 180.995 and agency adopting regulations, is not suspended or debarred or otherwise excluded from participating in the transaction. Condition: For two subrecipient samples that were selected, verification of subrecipient's suspension or debarment status was not verified. Context: A nonstatistical sample of 2 of 4 subrecipients were selected for testing for the Office for Coastal Management program. Condition noted above was identified during our procedures over subrecipients. Effect: CFSC did not verify suspension or debarment status, which could result in naming a subrecipient as an award recipient, which is potentially suspended or debarred. Cause: CFSC did not consistently ensure that Suspension or Debarment status was verified before naming the subrecipients tested as award recipients. Repeat Finding: The finding is not a repeat finding. Recommendation: We recommend that management strengthen its current policies and procedures to ensure that Suspension and Debarment Status is verified for each subrecipient applicant during its pre-award subrecipient screening process. Management’s Views: See separate corrective action plan.
Federal Agency: United States Department of Commerce Federal Program Name: Office for Coastal Management Assistance Listing Number: 11.473 Federal Award Identification Year: 2020 Pass-Through Agency: National Fish and Wildlife Grant Agreement Award Period: 9/1/20-08/31/23 Type of Finding: Material Weakness in Internal Control over Compliance and Material Noncompliance (Modified Opinion) Criteria: 2 CFR 200.332(d) - establishes that the auditee must monitor the activities of the subrecipient as necessary to ensure that the subaward is used for authorized purposes, in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the subaward; and that subaward performance goals are achieved. Condition: Management did not perform risk assessment for all subrecipients selected for testing. Management was unable to provide supporting documentation to show that they inquired with the subrecipients about any audits they had undergone or evidence that management received and reviewed audit reports to ensure timely follow ups were made if any findings pertaining to the Federal Award was noted. Context: A nonstatistical sample of 2 out of 4 subrecipients were selected for testing for the Office for Coastal Management program. The condition noted above was identified during our procedures over CFSC’s subrecipients. Effect: CFSC did not perform the following, which increases the risk of noncompliance:  Required risk assessments for the subrecipients,  Review subrecipient audit reports to ensure compliance with Federal Awards or make any necessary follow-ups pertaining to any findings noted, if any. Cause: CFSC’s procedures did not consistently ensure that the required risk assessments were performed. Repeat Finding: The finding is a repeat finding. Recommendation: We recommend that management modifies and strengthens its current policies and procedures to ensure that all required risk assessments are performed in accordance with the criteria outlined above. Management’s Views: See separate corrective action plan.
Federal Agency: United States Department of Commerce Federal Program Name: Office for Coastal Management Assistance Listing Number: 11.473 Federal Award Identification Year: 2020 Pass-Through Agency: National Fish and Wildlife Grant Agreement Award Period: 9/1/20-08/31/23 Type of Finding: Other Matters – Material Weakness in Internal Control Criteria: 2 CFR 200.414(c) - Federal award recipients must negotiate an indirect cost rate with the cognizant agency for indirect costs, which is typically the federal agency that provides the most funding to the recipient.2 CFR 200.403(d) - The negotiated rate must be applied consistently across all federal awards to ensure uniformity in cost allocation. 2 CFR 200.302(b)(3) - Recipients must maintain adequate documentation to support the indirect costs charged to federal awards, ensuring compliance with the cost principles outlined in the regulation. Condition: For two reimbursement requests from the grantor, an indirect cost rate was used, for which CSFC did not have a provisional or final rate agreement from the USDA. Context: Of the 2 reimbursements invoiced, 2 were selected for testing for the Office for Coastal Management program. The condition noted above was identified during our procedures over CFSC’s subrecipients. Effect: CFSC did not identify the error to be able to make the appropriate corrections before receiving reimbursement for incorrect indirect cost rate invoiced. Cause: CFSC’s procedures did not ensure that the negotiated provisional rate was invoiced properly. Repeat Finding: The finding is not a repeat finding. Recommendation: We recommend that CFSC modify and strengthen its current policies and procedures to perform review over the indirect cost rate utilized when submitting invoices to the grantor. Management’s Views: See separate corrective action plan.
Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Agriculture Forest Service Federal Program Name: Cooperative Forestry Assistance - Pass-Through Agency: N/A Assistance Listing Number: 10.664 Federal Award Identification Year: 2021 Award Period: 09/01/21-08/31/26 Type of Finding: Other Matters - Significant Deficiency in Internal Control Criteria: 2 CFR 200.403(a) - Except where otherwise authorized by statute, costs must meet the following general criteria in order to be allowable under Federal awards: Be necessary and reasonable for the performance of the Federal award and be allocable thereto under these principles. Condition: For one payroll sample that was selected, the amount of time charged to the grant was greater than the amount of time work was performed for the grant. As such, the program was overcharged. Context: A nonstatistical sample of 25 out of > 250 payroll entries were selected for testing for the Cooperative Forestry Assistance program. The condition noted above was identified during our procedures over the CFSC’s allowable costs provisions. Effect: CFSC did not identify the error to be able to make the appropriate corrections before receiving reimbursement for incorrect payroll related expenditures. Cause: CFSC did not consistently ensure that the hours worked by each employee related to the federal program were accurate applying the cost to the grant. Repeat Finding: The finding is a repeat finding. Recommendation: We recommend that management strengthen its current policies and procedures to ensure that all payroll amounts applied to the grant were for actual hours worked based on employee timesheets. Management’s Views: See separate corrective action plan.
Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Agriculture Forest Service Federal Program Name: Cooperative Forestry Assistance - Pass-Through Agency: N/A Assistance Listing Number: 10.664 Federal Award Identification Year: 2021 Award Period: 09/01/21-08/31/26 Type of Finding: Other Matters - Significant Deficiency in Internal Control Criteria: 2 CFR 200.403(a) - When a non-federal entity enters into a covered transaction with an entity at a lower tier, the non-federal entity must verify that the entity, as defined in 2 CFR section 180.995 and agency adopting regulations, is not suspended or debarred or otherwise excluded from participating in the transaction. Condition: For two subrecipient samples that were selected, verification of subrecipient's suspension or debarment status was not verified until after the subaward agreement was effective. Context: A nonstatistical sample of 6 out of 20 subrecipients were selected for testing for the Cooperative Forestry Assistance program. The condition noted above was identified during our procedures over CFSC’s subrecipients. Effect: CFSC did not verify suspension or debarment status timely which could result in naming a subrecipient as an award recipient who is potentially suspended or debarred. Cause: CFSC did not consistently ensure that Suspension or Debarment status was verified timely before naming the subrecipients tested as award recipients. Repeat Finding: The finding is not a repeat finding. Recommendation: We recommend that management strengthen its current policies and procedures to ensure that Suspension and Debarment Status is verified for each subrecipient applicant during its pre-award subrecipient screening process. Management’s Views: See separate corrective action plan.
Federal Agency: United States Department of Commerce Federal Program Name: Office for Coastal Management Assistance Listing Number: 11.473 Federal Award Identification Year: 2020 Pass-Through Agency: National Fish and Wildlife Grant Agreement Award Period: 9/1/20-08/31/23 Type of Finding: Other Matters - Significant Deficiency in Internal Control Criteria: 2 CFR 200.403(a) - Except where otherwise authorized by statute, costs must meet the following general criteria in order to be allowable under Federal awards: Be necessary and reasonable for the performance of the Federal award and be allocable thereto under these principles. Condition: For two payroll samples that were selected, the amount of time charged to the grant was greater than the amount of time work was performed for the grant. As such, the program was overcharged. Context: A nonstatistical sample of 8 out of 48 payroll entries were selected for testing for the Office for Coastal Management program. The condition noted above was identified during our procedures over the CFSC’s allowable costs provisions. Effect: CFSC did not identify the error to be able to make the appropriate corrections before receiving reimbursement for incorrect payroll related expenditures. Cause: CFSC did not consistently ensure that the hours worked by each employee related to the federal program were accurate applying the cost to the grant. Repeat Finding: The finding is a repeat finding. Recommendation: We recommend that management strengthen its current policies and procedures to ensure that all payroll amounts applied to the grant were for actual hours worked based on employee timesheets. Management’s Views: See separate corrective action plan.
Federal Agency: United States Department of Commerce Federal Program Name: Office for Coastal Management Assistance Listing Number: 11.473 Federal Award Identification Year: 2020 Pass-Through Agency: National Fish and Wildlife Grant Agreement Award Period: 9/1/20-08/31/23 Type of Finding: Other Matters - Significant Deficiency in Internal Control Criteria: 2 CFR 200.328 - Unless otherwise approved by OMB, the Federal awarding agency must solicit only the OMB-approved governmentwide data elements for collection of financial information (at time of publication the Federal Financial Report or such future, OMB approved, governmentwide data elements available from the OMB designated standards lead. This information must be collected with the frequency required by the terms and conditions of the Federal award, but no less frequently than annually nor more frequently than quarterly except in unusual circumstances, for example where more frequent reporting is necessary for the effective monitoring of the Federal award or could significantly affect program outcomes, and preferably in coordination with performance reporting. 2 CFR 200.329(c)(1) -Requirements state that the non-Federal entity must submit performance reports at the interval required by the Federal awarding agency or passthrough entity to best inform improvements in program outcomes and productivity. Condition: For one of the two reports selected for testing, CFSC did not submit the reports to the National Fish and Wildlife Foundation by the required date. Context: A nonstatistical sample of 2 out of 4 required reports were selected for testing for the Office for Coastal Management program. The condition noted above was identified during our procedures over the CFSC’s reporting requirements. Effect: CFSC did not submit required reports in a timely manner, increasing the risk of noncompliance. Cause: CFSC’s procedures did not consistently ensure that the required reports were submitted on a timely basis. Repeat Finding: The finding is a repeat finding. Recommendation: We recommend that management modify and strengthen its current policies and procedures to ensure that all required reports are submitted on a timely basis to the appropriate Federal Agency or Pass-Through Entity. Management’s Views: See separate corrective action plan.
Federal Agency: United States Department of Commerce Federal Program Name: Office for Coastal Management Assistance Listing Number: 11.473 Federal Award Identification Year: 2020 Award Period: 9/1/20-08/31/23 Type of Finding: Material Weakness in Internal Control over Compliance and Material Noncompliance (Modified Opinion) Criteria: 2 CFR 200.403(a) - When a non-federal entity enters into a covered transaction with an entity at a lower tier, the non-federal entity must verify that the entity, as defined in 2 CFR section 180.995 and agency adopting regulations, is not suspended or debarred or otherwise excluded from participating in the transaction. Condition: For two subrecipient samples that were selected, verification of subrecipient's suspension or debarment status was not verified. Context: A nonstatistical sample of 2 of 4 subrecipients were selected for testing for the Office for Coastal Management program. Condition noted above was identified during our procedures over subrecipients. Effect: CFSC did not verify suspension or debarment status, which could result in naming a subrecipient as an award recipient, which is potentially suspended or debarred. Cause: CFSC did not consistently ensure that Suspension or Debarment status was verified before naming the subrecipients tested as award recipients. Repeat Finding: The finding is not a repeat finding. Recommendation: We recommend that management strengthen its current policies and procedures to ensure that Suspension and Debarment Status is verified for each subrecipient applicant during its pre-award subrecipient screening process. Management’s Views: See separate corrective action plan.
Federal Agency: United States Department of Commerce Federal Program Name: Office for Coastal Management Assistance Listing Number: 11.473 Federal Award Identification Year: 2020 Pass-Through Agency: National Fish and Wildlife Grant Agreement Award Period: 9/1/20-08/31/23 Type of Finding: Material Weakness in Internal Control over Compliance and Material Noncompliance (Modified Opinion) Criteria: 2 CFR 200.332(d) - establishes that the auditee must monitor the activities of the subrecipient as necessary to ensure that the subaward is used for authorized purposes, in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the subaward; and that subaward performance goals are achieved. Condition: Management did not perform risk assessment for all subrecipients selected for testing. Management was unable to provide supporting documentation to show that they inquired with the subrecipients about any audits they had undergone or evidence that management received and reviewed audit reports to ensure timely follow ups were made if any findings pertaining to the Federal Award was noted. Context: A nonstatistical sample of 2 out of 4 subrecipients were selected for testing for the Office for Coastal Management program. The condition noted above was identified during our procedures over CFSC’s subrecipients. Effect: CFSC did not perform the following, which increases the risk of noncompliance:  Required risk assessments for the subrecipients,  Review subrecipient audit reports to ensure compliance with Federal Awards or make any necessary follow-ups pertaining to any findings noted, if any. Cause: CFSC’s procedures did not consistently ensure that the required risk assessments were performed. Repeat Finding: The finding is a repeat finding. Recommendation: We recommend that management modifies and strengthens its current policies and procedures to ensure that all required risk assessments are performed in accordance with the criteria outlined above. Management’s Views: See separate corrective action plan.
Federal Agency: United States Department of Commerce Federal Program Name: Office for Coastal Management Assistance Listing Number: 11.473 Federal Award Identification Year: 2020 Pass-Through Agency: National Fish and Wildlife Grant Agreement Award Period: 9/1/20-08/31/23 Type of Finding: Other Matters – Material Weakness in Internal Control Criteria: 2 CFR 200.414(c) - Federal award recipients must negotiate an indirect cost rate with the cognizant agency for indirect costs, which is typically the federal agency that provides the most funding to the recipient.2 CFR 200.403(d) - The negotiated rate must be applied consistently across all federal awards to ensure uniformity in cost allocation. 2 CFR 200.302(b)(3) - Recipients must maintain adequate documentation to support the indirect costs charged to federal awards, ensuring compliance with the cost principles outlined in the regulation. Condition: For two reimbursement requests from the grantor, an indirect cost rate was used, for which CSFC did not have a provisional or final rate agreement from the USDA. Context: Of the 2 reimbursements invoiced, 2 were selected for testing for the Office for Coastal Management program. The condition noted above was identified during our procedures over CFSC’s subrecipients. Effect: CFSC did not identify the error to be able to make the appropriate corrections before receiving reimbursement for incorrect indirect cost rate invoiced. Cause: CFSC’s procedures did not ensure that the negotiated provisional rate was invoiced properly. Repeat Finding: The finding is not a repeat finding. Recommendation: We recommend that CFSC modify and strengthen its current policies and procedures to perform review over the indirect cost rate utilized when submitting invoices to the grantor. Management’s Views: See separate corrective action plan.