Audit 348495

FY End
2024-06-30
Total Expended
$914,126
Findings
8
Programs
2
Organization: Project Quest (OR)
Year: 2024 Accepted: 2025-03-26

Organization Exclusion Status:

Checking exclusion status...

Findings

ID Ref Severity Repeat Requirement
537262 2024-002 Material Weakness - B
537263 2024-003 Significant Deficiency - L
537264 2024-002 Material Weakness - B
537265 2024-003 Significant Deficiency - L
1113704 2024-002 Material Weakness - B
1113705 2024-003 Significant Deficiency - L
1113706 2024-002 Material Weakness - B
1113707 2024-003 Significant Deficiency - L

Programs

ALN Program Spent Major Findings
93.914 Hiv Emergency Relief Project Grants $140,190 - 0
21.027 Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds $78,638 Yes 2

Contacts

Name Title Type
ZSYZNJUUBNM9 Janet Brandt Auditee
5032385203 Jessica Yoder Auditor
No contacts on file

Notes to SEFA

Title: 1 Accounting Policies: The accompanying schedule of expenditures of federal awards (the schedule) includes all federal grant activity of Quest Center under programs of the federal government for the year ended June 30, 2024. The information in this schedule is presented in accordance with the requirements of the Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance). Because the schedule presents only a selected portion of the operations of Quest Center, it is not intended to and does not present the financial position, changes in net assets or cash flows of Quest Center. Expenditures reported on the schedule are reported on the accrual basis of accounting. Such expenditures are recognized following cost principles contained in the Uniform Guidance, wherein certain types of expenditures are not allowable or are limited as to reimbursement. De Minimis Rate Used: Y Rate Explanation: Quest Center has elected to use the 10 percent de minimis indirect cost rate as allowed under the Uniform Guidance. Basis of Presentation
Title: 2 Accounting Policies: The accompanying schedule of expenditures of federal awards (the schedule) includes all federal grant activity of Quest Center under programs of the federal government for the year ended June 30, 2024. The information in this schedule is presented in accordance with the requirements of the Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance). Because the schedule presents only a selected portion of the operations of Quest Center, it is not intended to and does not present the financial position, changes in net assets or cash flows of Quest Center. Expenditures reported on the schedule are reported on the accrual basis of accounting. Such expenditures are recognized following cost principles contained in the Uniform Guidance, wherein certain types of expenditures are not allowable or are limited as to reimbursement. De Minimis Rate Used: Y Rate Explanation: Quest Center has elected to use the 10 percent de minimis indirect cost rate as allowed under the Uniform Guidance. Indirect costs

Finding Details

Finding # 2024-002 Type: Material weakness Type: Material noncompliance over allowable costs A.L. Number: 21.027 Requirement: Personnel expenses charged to federal awards must be supported records that reflect the time worked charged to the award. Condition: The Organization charged personnel expenses based on approved budgeted amounts in the award agreement. Context: Certain personnel time was charged to the award without documentation to support time and effort spent on the program. Cause: Organization personal were not aware of the time and effort tracking requirements for federal awards. Effect: Personnel costs could be charged to program for 1) work that was not performed on the program and 2) expenses covered by another funding source. Questioned Costs: Unknown Recommendation: We recommend the Organization implement a time and effort system to track employee time. This is typically done in a timesheet format that tracks all time worked by an employee, including programmatic and administrative time. Management’s Response: Management agrees with the finding. Management will work with the human resources function and payroll department to implement a system of time and effort tracking.
Finding # 2024-003 Type: Significant deficiency over reporting. Condition/Context: Reports submitted to funding agencies did not have documented review and approval. Cause: There was a lapse in the standard process for documenting the reviews and approvals. Questioned Costs: None. Recommendation: The Organization should implement additional procedures to make sure reviews and approvals are documented before reports are submitted. Management’s Response: The Organization agrees with the auditor’s recommendation. At the time of this audit’s publishing, the Organization has implemented additional procedures and controls to document review and approval of reports.
Finding # 2024-002 Type: Material weakness Type: Material noncompliance over allowable costs A.L. Number: 21.027 Requirement: Personnel expenses charged to federal awards must be supported records that reflect the time worked charged to the award. Condition: The Organization charged personnel expenses based on approved budgeted amounts in the award agreement. Context: Certain personnel time was charged to the award without documentation to support time and effort spent on the program. Cause: Organization personal were not aware of the time and effort tracking requirements for federal awards. Effect: Personnel costs could be charged to program for 1) work that was not performed on the program and 2) expenses covered by another funding source. Questioned Costs: Unknown Recommendation: We recommend the Organization implement a time and effort system to track employee time. This is typically done in a timesheet format that tracks all time worked by an employee, including programmatic and administrative time. Management’s Response: Management agrees with the finding. Management will work with the human resources function and payroll department to implement a system of time and effort tracking.
Finding # 2024-003 Type: Significant deficiency over reporting. Condition/Context: Reports submitted to funding agencies did not have documented review and approval. Cause: There was a lapse in the standard process for documenting the reviews and approvals. Questioned Costs: None. Recommendation: The Organization should implement additional procedures to make sure reviews and approvals are documented before reports are submitted. Management’s Response: The Organization agrees with the auditor’s recommendation. At the time of this audit’s publishing, the Organization has implemented additional procedures and controls to document review and approval of reports.
Finding # 2024-002 Type: Material weakness Type: Material noncompliance over allowable costs A.L. Number: 21.027 Requirement: Personnel expenses charged to federal awards must be supported records that reflect the time worked charged to the award. Condition: The Organization charged personnel expenses based on approved budgeted amounts in the award agreement. Context: Certain personnel time was charged to the award without documentation to support time and effort spent on the program. Cause: Organization personal were not aware of the time and effort tracking requirements for federal awards. Effect: Personnel costs could be charged to program for 1) work that was not performed on the program and 2) expenses covered by another funding source. Questioned Costs: Unknown Recommendation: We recommend the Organization implement a time and effort system to track employee time. This is typically done in a timesheet format that tracks all time worked by an employee, including programmatic and administrative time. Management’s Response: Management agrees with the finding. Management will work with the human resources function and payroll department to implement a system of time and effort tracking.
Finding # 2024-003 Type: Significant deficiency over reporting. Condition/Context: Reports submitted to funding agencies did not have documented review and approval. Cause: There was a lapse in the standard process for documenting the reviews and approvals. Questioned Costs: None. Recommendation: The Organization should implement additional procedures to make sure reviews and approvals are documented before reports are submitted. Management’s Response: The Organization agrees with the auditor’s recommendation. At the time of this audit’s publishing, the Organization has implemented additional procedures and controls to document review and approval of reports.
Finding # 2024-002 Type: Material weakness Type: Material noncompliance over allowable costs A.L. Number: 21.027 Requirement: Personnel expenses charged to federal awards must be supported records that reflect the time worked charged to the award. Condition: The Organization charged personnel expenses based on approved budgeted amounts in the award agreement. Context: Certain personnel time was charged to the award without documentation to support time and effort spent on the program. Cause: Organization personal were not aware of the time and effort tracking requirements for federal awards. Effect: Personnel costs could be charged to program for 1) work that was not performed on the program and 2) expenses covered by another funding source. Questioned Costs: Unknown Recommendation: We recommend the Organization implement a time and effort system to track employee time. This is typically done in a timesheet format that tracks all time worked by an employee, including programmatic and administrative time. Management’s Response: Management agrees with the finding. Management will work with the human resources function and payroll department to implement a system of time and effort tracking.
Finding # 2024-003 Type: Significant deficiency over reporting. Condition/Context: Reports submitted to funding agencies did not have documented review and approval. Cause: There was a lapse in the standard process for documenting the reviews and approvals. Questioned Costs: None. Recommendation: The Organization should implement additional procedures to make sure reviews and approvals are documented before reports are submitted. Management’s Response: The Organization agrees with the auditor’s recommendation. At the time of this audit’s publishing, the Organization has implemented additional procedures and controls to document review and approval of reports.