Audit 347431

FY End
2024-06-30
Total Expended
$49.03M
Findings
4
Programs
12
Organization: Bay Path University (MA)
Year: 2024 Accepted: 2025-03-23

Organization Exclusion Status:

Checking exclusion status...

Findings

ID Ref Severity Repeat Requirement
529425 2024-001 Significant Deficiency - N
529426 2024-001 Significant Deficiency - N
1105867 2024-001 Significant Deficiency - N
1105868 2024-001 Significant Deficiency - N

Contacts

Name Title Type
CYCXDDJXQKZ8 Stephanie King Auditee
4135651345 David Diiulis Auditor
No contacts on file

Notes to SEFA

Title: Basis of Presentation Accounting Policies: Expenditures reported on the Schedule are reported on the accrual basis of accounting. Such expenditures are recognized following the cost principles contained in the Uniform Guidance. De Minimis Rate Used: N Rate Explanation: The College has elected not to use the 10-percent de minimis indirect cost rate as allowed under the Uniform Guidance. The accompanying Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (the Schedule) includes the federal award activity of Bay Path University (the University) under programs of the Federal Government for the year ended June 30, 2024. The information on this Schedule is prepared in accordance with the requirements of Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance). Because the Schedule presents only a selected portion of the operations of the University, it is not intended to, and does not present, the financial position, changes in net assets or cash flows of the University.
Title: Federal Student Loan Programs Accounting Policies: Expenditures reported on the Schedule are reported on the accrual basis of accounting. Such expenditures are recognized following the cost principles contained in the Uniform Guidance. De Minimis Rate Used: N Rate Explanation: The College has elected not to use the 10-percent de minimis indirect cost rate as allowed under the Uniform Guidance. Direct Student Loan Program The University disbursed $40,476,956 of loans under the Federal Direct Student Loans program, which include Stafford Subsidized and Unsubsidized Loans and Parent Plus Loans. The University is only responsible for the performance of certain administrative duties and, accordingly, there are no significant continuing compliance requirements and these loans are not included in the University’s financial statements. Perkins Loan Program The Federal Perkins Loan program is administered directly by the University and balances and transactions relating to this program are included in the University’s basic financial statements. Loans outstanding at the beginning of the year and loans made during the year are included in the federal expenditures presented in the Schedule. There were no administrative costs incurred and the balance of loans outstanding at June 30, 2023, is $957,146.

Finding Details

Criteria According to 34 CFR 685.309(b)(2): Unless [the institution] it expects to submit its next updated enrollment report to the Secretary within the next 60 days, a school must notify the Secretary within 30 days after the date the school discovers that – (i) A loan under title IV of the Act was made to or on behalf of a student who was enrolled or accepted for enrollment at the school, and the student has ceased to be enrolled on at least a half-time basis or failed to enroll on at least a half-time basis for the period for which the loan was intended; or (ii) A student who is enrolled at the school and who received a loan under title IV of the Act has changed his or her permanent address. The Dear Colleague Letter GEN-12-6 issued by the U.S. Department of Education (“ED”) on March 30, 2012 states that in addition to student loan borrowers, Enrollment Reporting files will include two additional groups of students: Pell Grant and Perkins Loan recipients. According to 2 CFR Part 200, Appendix XI Compliance Supplement updated: Under the Pell Grant and loan programs, institutions must complete and return within 15 days the Enrollment Reporting roster file placed in their Student Aid Internet Gateway mailboxes sent by ED via the National Student Loan Data System (“NSLDS”). The institution determines how often it receives the Enrollment Reporting roster file with the default set at a minimum of every 60 days. Once received, the institution must update for changes in student status, report the date the enrollment status was effective, enter the new anticipated completion date, and submit the changes electronically through the batch method or the NSLDS website. Institutions are responsible for timely reporting, whether they report directly or via a third-party servicer. Condition The Federal Government requires the University to report student enrollment changes to the National Student Loan Data System (“NSLDS”) within 60 days. During our testing, we noted 1 student, out of a sample of 40, was not reported to NSLDS within the required timeframe and 1 student, out of a sample of 40, that had incorrect status changes reported to NSLDS. Cause The University did not have adequate procedures in place to ensure that students with status changes were reported to NSLDS within the required timeframe. Effect The University did not report the students’ status changes to NSLDS within the required timeframe, which may impact the students’ loan grace periods.  Questioned Costs Not applicable. Perspective Our sample was not, and was not intended to be, statistically valid. Of the 40 students selected for testing, 1 student, or 2.5% of our sample, had status changes that were not reported to NSLDS within the required timeframe and 1 student, or 2.5% of our sample, had an incorrect status change reported to NSLDS. Identification as a Repeat Finding, if applicable Not applicable. Recommendation The University/University should provide training to employees responsible for processing information for the NSLDS and ensure that they have adequate knowledge in the related rules and regulations. This training should include an explanation of the University’s/University’s date of determination of withdrawal, the importance of reporting the timely and the consequences of late reporting. Additionally, submission of additional rosters may reduce the likelihood of the finding in the future. View of Responsible Officials The University agrees with the finding.
Criteria According to 34 CFR 685.309(b)(2): Unless [the institution] it expects to submit its next updated enrollment report to the Secretary within the next 60 days, a school must notify the Secretary within 30 days after the date the school discovers that – (i) A loan under title IV of the Act was made to or on behalf of a student who was enrolled or accepted for enrollment at the school, and the student has ceased to be enrolled on at least a half-time basis or failed to enroll on at least a half-time basis for the period for which the loan was intended; or (ii) A student who is enrolled at the school and who received a loan under title IV of the Act has changed his or her permanent address. The Dear Colleague Letter GEN-12-6 issued by the U.S. Department of Education (“ED”) on March 30, 2012 states that in addition to student loan borrowers, Enrollment Reporting files will include two additional groups of students: Pell Grant and Perkins Loan recipients. According to 2 CFR Part 200, Appendix XI Compliance Supplement updated: Under the Pell Grant and loan programs, institutions must complete and return within 15 days the Enrollment Reporting roster file placed in their Student Aid Internet Gateway mailboxes sent by ED via the National Student Loan Data System (“NSLDS”). The institution determines how often it receives the Enrollment Reporting roster file with the default set at a minimum of every 60 days. Once received, the institution must update for changes in student status, report the date the enrollment status was effective, enter the new anticipated completion date, and submit the changes electronically through the batch method or the NSLDS website. Institutions are responsible for timely reporting, whether they report directly or via a third-party servicer. Condition The Federal Government requires the University to report student enrollment changes to the National Student Loan Data System (“NSLDS”) within 60 days. During our testing, we noted 1 student, out of a sample of 40, was not reported to NSLDS within the required timeframe and 1 student, out of a sample of 40, that had incorrect status changes reported to NSLDS. Cause The University did not have adequate procedures in place to ensure that students with status changes were reported to NSLDS within the required timeframe. Effect The University did not report the students’ status changes to NSLDS within the required timeframe, which may impact the students’ loan grace periods.  Questioned Costs Not applicable. Perspective Our sample was not, and was not intended to be, statistically valid. Of the 40 students selected for testing, 1 student, or 2.5% of our sample, had status changes that were not reported to NSLDS within the required timeframe and 1 student, or 2.5% of our sample, had an incorrect status change reported to NSLDS. Identification as a Repeat Finding, if applicable Not applicable. Recommendation The University/University should provide training to employees responsible for processing information for the NSLDS and ensure that they have adequate knowledge in the related rules and regulations. This training should include an explanation of the University’s/University’s date of determination of withdrawal, the importance of reporting the timely and the consequences of late reporting. Additionally, submission of additional rosters may reduce the likelihood of the finding in the future. View of Responsible Officials The University agrees with the finding.
Criteria According to 34 CFR 685.309(b)(2): Unless [the institution] it expects to submit its next updated enrollment report to the Secretary within the next 60 days, a school must notify the Secretary within 30 days after the date the school discovers that – (i) A loan under title IV of the Act was made to or on behalf of a student who was enrolled or accepted for enrollment at the school, and the student has ceased to be enrolled on at least a half-time basis or failed to enroll on at least a half-time basis for the period for which the loan was intended; or (ii) A student who is enrolled at the school and who received a loan under title IV of the Act has changed his or her permanent address. The Dear Colleague Letter GEN-12-6 issued by the U.S. Department of Education (“ED”) on March 30, 2012 states that in addition to student loan borrowers, Enrollment Reporting files will include two additional groups of students: Pell Grant and Perkins Loan recipients. According to 2 CFR Part 200, Appendix XI Compliance Supplement updated: Under the Pell Grant and loan programs, institutions must complete and return within 15 days the Enrollment Reporting roster file placed in their Student Aid Internet Gateway mailboxes sent by ED via the National Student Loan Data System (“NSLDS”). The institution determines how often it receives the Enrollment Reporting roster file with the default set at a minimum of every 60 days. Once received, the institution must update for changes in student status, report the date the enrollment status was effective, enter the new anticipated completion date, and submit the changes electronically through the batch method or the NSLDS website. Institutions are responsible for timely reporting, whether they report directly or via a third-party servicer. Condition The Federal Government requires the University to report student enrollment changes to the National Student Loan Data System (“NSLDS”) within 60 days. During our testing, we noted 1 student, out of a sample of 40, was not reported to NSLDS within the required timeframe and 1 student, out of a sample of 40, that had incorrect status changes reported to NSLDS. Cause The University did not have adequate procedures in place to ensure that students with status changes were reported to NSLDS within the required timeframe. Effect The University did not report the students’ status changes to NSLDS within the required timeframe, which may impact the students’ loan grace periods.  Questioned Costs Not applicable. Perspective Our sample was not, and was not intended to be, statistically valid. Of the 40 students selected for testing, 1 student, or 2.5% of our sample, had status changes that were not reported to NSLDS within the required timeframe and 1 student, or 2.5% of our sample, had an incorrect status change reported to NSLDS. Identification as a Repeat Finding, if applicable Not applicable. Recommendation The University/University should provide training to employees responsible for processing information for the NSLDS and ensure that they have adequate knowledge in the related rules and regulations. This training should include an explanation of the University’s/University’s date of determination of withdrawal, the importance of reporting the timely and the consequences of late reporting. Additionally, submission of additional rosters may reduce the likelihood of the finding in the future. View of Responsible Officials The University agrees with the finding.
Criteria According to 34 CFR 685.309(b)(2): Unless [the institution] it expects to submit its next updated enrollment report to the Secretary within the next 60 days, a school must notify the Secretary within 30 days after the date the school discovers that – (i) A loan under title IV of the Act was made to or on behalf of a student who was enrolled or accepted for enrollment at the school, and the student has ceased to be enrolled on at least a half-time basis or failed to enroll on at least a half-time basis for the period for which the loan was intended; or (ii) A student who is enrolled at the school and who received a loan under title IV of the Act has changed his or her permanent address. The Dear Colleague Letter GEN-12-6 issued by the U.S. Department of Education (“ED”) on March 30, 2012 states that in addition to student loan borrowers, Enrollment Reporting files will include two additional groups of students: Pell Grant and Perkins Loan recipients. According to 2 CFR Part 200, Appendix XI Compliance Supplement updated: Under the Pell Grant and loan programs, institutions must complete and return within 15 days the Enrollment Reporting roster file placed in their Student Aid Internet Gateway mailboxes sent by ED via the National Student Loan Data System (“NSLDS”). The institution determines how often it receives the Enrollment Reporting roster file with the default set at a minimum of every 60 days. Once received, the institution must update for changes in student status, report the date the enrollment status was effective, enter the new anticipated completion date, and submit the changes electronically through the batch method or the NSLDS website. Institutions are responsible for timely reporting, whether they report directly or via a third-party servicer. Condition The Federal Government requires the University to report student enrollment changes to the National Student Loan Data System (“NSLDS”) within 60 days. During our testing, we noted 1 student, out of a sample of 40, was not reported to NSLDS within the required timeframe and 1 student, out of a sample of 40, that had incorrect status changes reported to NSLDS. Cause The University did not have adequate procedures in place to ensure that students with status changes were reported to NSLDS within the required timeframe. Effect The University did not report the students’ status changes to NSLDS within the required timeframe, which may impact the students’ loan grace periods.  Questioned Costs Not applicable. Perspective Our sample was not, and was not intended to be, statistically valid. Of the 40 students selected for testing, 1 student, or 2.5% of our sample, had status changes that were not reported to NSLDS within the required timeframe and 1 student, or 2.5% of our sample, had an incorrect status change reported to NSLDS. Identification as a Repeat Finding, if applicable Not applicable. Recommendation The University/University should provide training to employees responsible for processing information for the NSLDS and ensure that they have adequate knowledge in the related rules and regulations. This training should include an explanation of the University’s/University’s date of determination of withdrawal, the importance of reporting the timely and the consequences of late reporting. Additionally, submission of additional rosters may reduce the likelihood of the finding in the future. View of Responsible Officials The University agrees with the finding.