Audit 346313

FY End
2024-06-30
Total Expended
$28.60M
Findings
14
Programs
20
Year: 2024 Accepted: 2025-03-17
Auditor: Auditor General

Organization Exclusion Status:

Checking exclusion status...

Findings

ID Ref Severity Repeat Requirement
528272 2024-001 Significant Deficiency - B
528273 2024-001 Significant Deficiency - B
528274 2024-001 Significant Deficiency - B
528275 2024-001 Significant Deficiency - B
528276 2024-001 Significant Deficiency - B
528277 2024-001 Significant Deficiency - B
528278 2024-001 Significant Deficiency - B
1104714 2024-001 Significant Deficiency - B
1104715 2024-001 Significant Deficiency - B
1104716 2024-001 Significant Deficiency - B
1104717 2024-001 Significant Deficiency - B
1104718 2024-001 Significant Deficiency - B
1104719 2024-001 Significant Deficiency - B
1104720 2024-001 Significant Deficiency - B

Contacts

Name Title Type
HLJ4HNMM58Z5 Lindsay Laxton Auditee
3867558012 Edward Waller, CPA Auditor
No contacts on file

Notes to SEFA

Title: Basis of Presentation Accounting Policies: Note 1 and 2 De Minimis Rate Used: N Rate Explanation: Note 3 The accompanying Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (Schedule) includes the Federal award activity of the Columbia County District School Board under programs of the Federal Government for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2024. The information in this Schedule is presented in accordance with the requirements of Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance). Because the Schedule presents only a selected portion of the operations of the District, it is not intended to and does not present the financial position, changes in net position, or cash flows of the District.
Title: Summary of Significant Accounting Policies Accounting Policies: Note 1 and 2 De Minimis Rate Used: N Rate Explanation: Note 3 Expenditures reported on the Schedule are reported on the modified accrual basis of accounting. Such expenditures are recognized following the cost principles contained in the Uniform Guidance, wherein certain types of expenditures are not allowable or are limited as to reimbursement.
Title: Indirect Cost Rate Accounting Policies: Note 1 and 2 De Minimis Rate Used: N Rate Explanation: Note 3 The District has not elected to use the 10 percent de minimis cost rate allowed under the Uniform Guidance.
Title: Noncash Assistance - National School Lunch Program Accounting Policies: Note 1 and 2 De Minimis Rate Used: N Rate Explanation: Note 3 Includes $422,373.89 of donated food received during the fiscal year. Donated foods are valued at fair value at the time of donation.

Finding Details

Finding - The District charged Federal programs for health insurance program premium costs totaling $496,203 for several Federally funded employees who did not participate in the health insurance program, resulting in Federal program questioned costs of that amount. Criteria - Title 2, Section 200.403, Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), provides that, for an expenditure to be allowable under Federal awards, costs must be necessary and reasonable for the performance of the Federal award and must be adequately documented. Title 2, Section 200.431, CFR, provides that the costs of fringe benefits, including employee insurance, are allowable provided that the benefits are reasonable and required by law, District-employee agreement, or an established policy of the District. Condition - For the 2023-24 fiscal year, the District provided an employee health insurance program as an employee fringe benefit for program participants and the Board authorized District contributions for individual and family coverage, including contributions for Federally funded employees.  The District recorded health insurance premium expenditures each pay period for each employee; however, several Federally funded employees did not participate in the health insurance program. Consequently, the Federal programs should not have incurred health insurance costs for those employees. Based on our discussions with District personnel and examination of District records, we found that the health insurance premium costs for Federally funded employees who did not participate in the health insurance program totaled $496,203. Cause - District personnel indicated that they did not monitor the health insurance program participants and related expenditures to ensure that the premium costs were only recorded for health insurance program participants. District personnel also agreed with the questioned costs calculations. Effect - The District did not comply with Federal regulations that require all Federal expenditures to represent reasonable and necessary charges. Consequently, the CNC incurred questioned costs totaling $306,926, the SEC incurred questioned costs totaling $108,444, and the Title I Program incurred questioned costs totaling $80,833. Recommendation - The District should establish effective procedures for monitoring the health insurance program participants and related expenditures to ensure that premium costs are only recorded for program participants. Also, the District should document to the respective grantors the allowability of the questioned costs totaling $496,203 or restore these moneys to the appropriate Federal programs. District Response - The District agrees with the finding. We will work with DOE and other district finance officers to ensure processes going forward are accurate and appropriate with no programs being overcharged.
Finding - The District charged Federal programs for health insurance program premium costs totaling $496,203 for several Federally funded employees who did not participate in the health insurance program, resulting in Federal program questioned costs of that amount. Criteria - Title 2, Section 200.403, Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), provides that, for an expenditure to be allowable under Federal awards, costs must be necessary and reasonable for the performance of the Federal award and must be adequately documented. Title 2, Section 200.431, CFR, provides that the costs of fringe benefits, including employee insurance, are allowable provided that the benefits are reasonable and required by law, District-employee agreement, or an established policy of the District. Condition - For the 2023-24 fiscal year, the District provided an employee health insurance program as an employee fringe benefit for program participants and the Board authorized District contributions for individual and family coverage, including contributions for Federally funded employees.  The District recorded health insurance premium expenditures each pay period for each employee; however, several Federally funded employees did not participate in the health insurance program. Consequently, the Federal programs should not have incurred health insurance costs for those employees. Based on our discussions with District personnel and examination of District records, we found that the health insurance premium costs for Federally funded employees who did not participate in the health insurance program totaled $496,203. Cause - District personnel indicated that they did not monitor the health insurance program participants and related expenditures to ensure that the premium costs were only recorded for health insurance program participants. District personnel also agreed with the questioned costs calculations. Effect - The District did not comply with Federal regulations that require all Federal expenditures to represent reasonable and necessary charges. Consequently, the CNC incurred questioned costs totaling $306,926, the SEC incurred questioned costs totaling $108,444, and the Title I Program incurred questioned costs totaling $80,833. Recommendation - The District should establish effective procedures for monitoring the health insurance program participants and related expenditures to ensure that premium costs are only recorded for program participants. Also, the District should document to the respective grantors the allowability of the questioned costs totaling $496,203 or restore these moneys to the appropriate Federal programs. District Response - The District agrees with the finding. We will work with DOE and other district finance officers to ensure processes going forward are accurate and appropriate with no programs being overcharged.
Finding - The District charged Federal programs for health insurance program premium costs totaling $496,203 for several Federally funded employees who did not participate in the health insurance program, resulting in Federal program questioned costs of that amount. Criteria - Title 2, Section 200.403, Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), provides that, for an expenditure to be allowable under Federal awards, costs must be necessary and reasonable for the performance of the Federal award and must be adequately documented. Title 2, Section 200.431, CFR, provides that the costs of fringe benefits, including employee insurance, are allowable provided that the benefits are reasonable and required by law, District-employee agreement, or an established policy of the District. Condition - For the 2023-24 fiscal year, the District provided an employee health insurance program as an employee fringe benefit for program participants and the Board authorized District contributions for individual and family coverage, including contributions for Federally funded employees.  The District recorded health insurance premium expenditures each pay period for each employee; however, several Federally funded employees did not participate in the health insurance program. Consequently, the Federal programs should not have incurred health insurance costs for those employees. Based on our discussions with District personnel and examination of District records, we found that the health insurance premium costs for Federally funded employees who did not participate in the health insurance program totaled $496,203. Cause - District personnel indicated that they did not monitor the health insurance program participants and related expenditures to ensure that the premium costs were only recorded for health insurance program participants. District personnel also agreed with the questioned costs calculations. Effect - The District did not comply with Federal regulations that require all Federal expenditures to represent reasonable and necessary charges. Consequently, the CNC incurred questioned costs totaling $306,926, the SEC incurred questioned costs totaling $108,444, and the Title I Program incurred questioned costs totaling $80,833. Recommendation - The District should establish effective procedures for monitoring the health insurance program participants and related expenditures to ensure that premium costs are only recorded for program participants. Also, the District should document to the respective grantors the allowability of the questioned costs totaling $496,203 or restore these moneys to the appropriate Federal programs. District Response - The District agrees with the finding. We will work with DOE and other district finance officers to ensure processes going forward are accurate and appropriate with no programs being overcharged.
Finding - The District charged Federal programs for health insurance program premium costs totaling $496,203 for several Federally funded employees who did not participate in the health insurance program, resulting in Federal program questioned costs of that amount. Criteria - Title 2, Section 200.403, Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), provides that, for an expenditure to be allowable under Federal awards, costs must be necessary and reasonable for the performance of the Federal award and must be adequately documented. Title 2, Section 200.431, CFR, provides that the costs of fringe benefits, including employee insurance, are allowable provided that the benefits are reasonable and required by law, District-employee agreement, or an established policy of the District. Condition - For the 2023-24 fiscal year, the District provided an employee health insurance program as an employee fringe benefit for program participants and the Board authorized District contributions for individual and family coverage, including contributions for Federally funded employees.  The District recorded health insurance premium expenditures each pay period for each employee; however, several Federally funded employees did not participate in the health insurance program. Consequently, the Federal programs should not have incurred health insurance costs for those employees. Based on our discussions with District personnel and examination of District records, we found that the health insurance premium costs for Federally funded employees who did not participate in the health insurance program totaled $496,203. Cause - District personnel indicated that they did not monitor the health insurance program participants and related expenditures to ensure that the premium costs were only recorded for health insurance program participants. District personnel also agreed with the questioned costs calculations. Effect - The District did not comply with Federal regulations that require all Federal expenditures to represent reasonable and necessary charges. Consequently, the CNC incurred questioned costs totaling $306,926, the SEC incurred questioned costs totaling $108,444, and the Title I Program incurred questioned costs totaling $80,833. Recommendation - The District should establish effective procedures for monitoring the health insurance program participants and related expenditures to ensure that premium costs are only recorded for program participants. Also, the District should document to the respective grantors the allowability of the questioned costs totaling $496,203 or restore these moneys to the appropriate Federal programs. District Response - The District agrees with the finding. We will work with DOE and other district finance officers to ensure processes going forward are accurate and appropriate with no programs being overcharged.
Finding - The District charged Federal programs for health insurance program premium costs totaling $496,203 for several Federally funded employees who did not participate in the health insurance program, resulting in Federal program questioned costs of that amount. Criteria - Title 2, Section 200.403, Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), provides that, for an expenditure to be allowable under Federal awards, costs must be necessary and reasonable for the performance of the Federal award and must be adequately documented. Title 2, Section 200.431, CFR, provides that the costs of fringe benefits, including employee insurance, are allowable provided that the benefits are reasonable and required by law, District-employee agreement, or an established policy of the District. Condition - For the 2023-24 fiscal year, the District provided an employee health insurance program as an employee fringe benefit for program participants and the Board authorized District contributions for individual and family coverage, including contributions for Federally funded employees.  The District recorded health insurance premium expenditures each pay period for each employee; however, several Federally funded employees did not participate in the health insurance program. Consequently, the Federal programs should not have incurred health insurance costs for those employees. Based on our discussions with District personnel and examination of District records, we found that the health insurance premium costs for Federally funded employees who did not participate in the health insurance program totaled $496,203. Cause - District personnel indicated that they did not monitor the health insurance program participants and related expenditures to ensure that the premium costs were only recorded for health insurance program participants. District personnel also agreed with the questioned costs calculations. Effect - The District did not comply with Federal regulations that require all Federal expenditures to represent reasonable and necessary charges. Consequently, the CNC incurred questioned costs totaling $306,926, the SEC incurred questioned costs totaling $108,444, and the Title I Program incurred questioned costs totaling $80,833. Recommendation - The District should establish effective procedures for monitoring the health insurance program participants and related expenditures to ensure that premium costs are only recorded for program participants. Also, the District should document to the respective grantors the allowability of the questioned costs totaling $496,203 or restore these moneys to the appropriate Federal programs. District Response - The District agrees with the finding. We will work with DOE and other district finance officers to ensure processes going forward are accurate and appropriate with no programs being overcharged.
Finding - The District charged Federal programs for health insurance program premium costs totaling $496,203 for several Federally funded employees who did not participate in the health insurance program, resulting in Federal program questioned costs of that amount. Criteria - Title 2, Section 200.403, Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), provides that, for an expenditure to be allowable under Federal awards, costs must be necessary and reasonable for the performance of the Federal award and must be adequately documented. Title 2, Section 200.431, CFR, provides that the costs of fringe benefits, including employee insurance, are allowable provided that the benefits are reasonable and required by law, District-employee agreement, or an established policy of the District. Condition - For the 2023-24 fiscal year, the District provided an employee health insurance program as an employee fringe benefit for program participants and the Board authorized District contributions for individual and family coverage, including contributions for Federally funded employees.  The District recorded health insurance premium expenditures each pay period for each employee; however, several Federally funded employees did not participate in the health insurance program. Consequently, the Federal programs should not have incurred health insurance costs for those employees. Based on our discussions with District personnel and examination of District records, we found that the health insurance premium costs for Federally funded employees who did not participate in the health insurance program totaled $496,203. Cause - District personnel indicated that they did not monitor the health insurance program participants and related expenditures to ensure that the premium costs were only recorded for health insurance program participants. District personnel also agreed with the questioned costs calculations. Effect - The District did not comply with Federal regulations that require all Federal expenditures to represent reasonable and necessary charges. Consequently, the CNC incurred questioned costs totaling $306,926, the SEC incurred questioned costs totaling $108,444, and the Title I Program incurred questioned costs totaling $80,833. Recommendation - The District should establish effective procedures for monitoring the health insurance program participants and related expenditures to ensure that premium costs are only recorded for program participants. Also, the District should document to the respective grantors the allowability of the questioned costs totaling $496,203 or restore these moneys to the appropriate Federal programs. District Response - The District agrees with the finding. We will work with DOE and other district finance officers to ensure processes going forward are accurate and appropriate with no programs being overcharged.
Finding - The District charged Federal programs for health insurance program premium costs totaling $496,203 for several Federally funded employees who did not participate in the health insurance program, resulting in Federal program questioned costs of that amount. Criteria - Title 2, Section 200.403, Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), provides that, for an expenditure to be allowable under Federal awards, costs must be necessary and reasonable for the performance of the Federal award and must be adequately documented. Title 2, Section 200.431, CFR, provides that the costs of fringe benefits, including employee insurance, are allowable provided that the benefits are reasonable and required by law, District-employee agreement, or an established policy of the District. Condition - For the 2023-24 fiscal year, the District provided an employee health insurance program as an employee fringe benefit for program participants and the Board authorized District contributions for individual and family coverage, including contributions for Federally funded employees.  The District recorded health insurance premium expenditures each pay period for each employee; however, several Federally funded employees did not participate in the health insurance program. Consequently, the Federal programs should not have incurred health insurance costs for those employees. Based on our discussions with District personnel and examination of District records, we found that the health insurance premium costs for Federally funded employees who did not participate in the health insurance program totaled $496,203. Cause - District personnel indicated that they did not monitor the health insurance program participants and related expenditures to ensure that the premium costs were only recorded for health insurance program participants. District personnel also agreed with the questioned costs calculations. Effect - The District did not comply with Federal regulations that require all Federal expenditures to represent reasonable and necessary charges. Consequently, the CNC incurred questioned costs totaling $306,926, the SEC incurred questioned costs totaling $108,444, and the Title I Program incurred questioned costs totaling $80,833. Recommendation - The District should establish effective procedures for monitoring the health insurance program participants and related expenditures to ensure that premium costs are only recorded for program participants. Also, the District should document to the respective grantors the allowability of the questioned costs totaling $496,203 or restore these moneys to the appropriate Federal programs. District Response - The District agrees with the finding. We will work with DOE and other district finance officers to ensure processes going forward are accurate and appropriate with no programs being overcharged.
Finding - The District charged Federal programs for health insurance program premium costs totaling $496,203 for several Federally funded employees who did not participate in the health insurance program, resulting in Federal program questioned costs of that amount. Criteria - Title 2, Section 200.403, Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), provides that, for an expenditure to be allowable under Federal awards, costs must be necessary and reasonable for the performance of the Federal award and must be adequately documented. Title 2, Section 200.431, CFR, provides that the costs of fringe benefits, including employee insurance, are allowable provided that the benefits are reasonable and required by law, District-employee agreement, or an established policy of the District. Condition - For the 2023-24 fiscal year, the District provided an employee health insurance program as an employee fringe benefit for program participants and the Board authorized District contributions for individual and family coverage, including contributions for Federally funded employees.  The District recorded health insurance premium expenditures each pay period for each employee; however, several Federally funded employees did not participate in the health insurance program. Consequently, the Federal programs should not have incurred health insurance costs for those employees. Based on our discussions with District personnel and examination of District records, we found that the health insurance premium costs for Federally funded employees who did not participate in the health insurance program totaled $496,203. Cause - District personnel indicated that they did not monitor the health insurance program participants and related expenditures to ensure that the premium costs were only recorded for health insurance program participants. District personnel also agreed with the questioned costs calculations. Effect - The District did not comply with Federal regulations that require all Federal expenditures to represent reasonable and necessary charges. Consequently, the CNC incurred questioned costs totaling $306,926, the SEC incurred questioned costs totaling $108,444, and the Title I Program incurred questioned costs totaling $80,833. Recommendation - The District should establish effective procedures for monitoring the health insurance program participants and related expenditures to ensure that premium costs are only recorded for program participants. Also, the District should document to the respective grantors the allowability of the questioned costs totaling $496,203 or restore these moneys to the appropriate Federal programs. District Response - The District agrees with the finding. We will work with DOE and other district finance officers to ensure processes going forward are accurate and appropriate with no programs being overcharged.
Finding - The District charged Federal programs for health insurance program premium costs totaling $496,203 for several Federally funded employees who did not participate in the health insurance program, resulting in Federal program questioned costs of that amount. Criteria - Title 2, Section 200.403, Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), provides that, for an expenditure to be allowable under Federal awards, costs must be necessary and reasonable for the performance of the Federal award and must be adequately documented. Title 2, Section 200.431, CFR, provides that the costs of fringe benefits, including employee insurance, are allowable provided that the benefits are reasonable and required by law, District-employee agreement, or an established policy of the District. Condition - For the 2023-24 fiscal year, the District provided an employee health insurance program as an employee fringe benefit for program participants and the Board authorized District contributions for individual and family coverage, including contributions for Federally funded employees.  The District recorded health insurance premium expenditures each pay period for each employee; however, several Federally funded employees did not participate in the health insurance program. Consequently, the Federal programs should not have incurred health insurance costs for those employees. Based on our discussions with District personnel and examination of District records, we found that the health insurance premium costs for Federally funded employees who did not participate in the health insurance program totaled $496,203. Cause - District personnel indicated that they did not monitor the health insurance program participants and related expenditures to ensure that the premium costs were only recorded for health insurance program participants. District personnel also agreed with the questioned costs calculations. Effect - The District did not comply with Federal regulations that require all Federal expenditures to represent reasonable and necessary charges. Consequently, the CNC incurred questioned costs totaling $306,926, the SEC incurred questioned costs totaling $108,444, and the Title I Program incurred questioned costs totaling $80,833. Recommendation - The District should establish effective procedures for monitoring the health insurance program participants and related expenditures to ensure that premium costs are only recorded for program participants. Also, the District should document to the respective grantors the allowability of the questioned costs totaling $496,203 or restore these moneys to the appropriate Federal programs. District Response - The District agrees with the finding. We will work with DOE and other district finance officers to ensure processes going forward are accurate and appropriate with no programs being overcharged.
Finding - The District charged Federal programs for health insurance program premium costs totaling $496,203 for several Federally funded employees who did not participate in the health insurance program, resulting in Federal program questioned costs of that amount. Criteria - Title 2, Section 200.403, Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), provides that, for an expenditure to be allowable under Federal awards, costs must be necessary and reasonable for the performance of the Federal award and must be adequately documented. Title 2, Section 200.431, CFR, provides that the costs of fringe benefits, including employee insurance, are allowable provided that the benefits are reasonable and required by law, District-employee agreement, or an established policy of the District. Condition - For the 2023-24 fiscal year, the District provided an employee health insurance program as an employee fringe benefit for program participants and the Board authorized District contributions for individual and family coverage, including contributions for Federally funded employees.  The District recorded health insurance premium expenditures each pay period for each employee; however, several Federally funded employees did not participate in the health insurance program. Consequently, the Federal programs should not have incurred health insurance costs for those employees. Based on our discussions with District personnel and examination of District records, we found that the health insurance premium costs for Federally funded employees who did not participate in the health insurance program totaled $496,203. Cause - District personnel indicated that they did not monitor the health insurance program participants and related expenditures to ensure that the premium costs were only recorded for health insurance program participants. District personnel also agreed with the questioned costs calculations. Effect - The District did not comply with Federal regulations that require all Federal expenditures to represent reasonable and necessary charges. Consequently, the CNC incurred questioned costs totaling $306,926, the SEC incurred questioned costs totaling $108,444, and the Title I Program incurred questioned costs totaling $80,833. Recommendation - The District should establish effective procedures for monitoring the health insurance program participants and related expenditures to ensure that premium costs are only recorded for program participants. Also, the District should document to the respective grantors the allowability of the questioned costs totaling $496,203 or restore these moneys to the appropriate Federal programs. District Response - The District agrees with the finding. We will work with DOE and other district finance officers to ensure processes going forward are accurate and appropriate with no programs being overcharged.
Finding - The District charged Federal programs for health insurance program premium costs totaling $496,203 for several Federally funded employees who did not participate in the health insurance program, resulting in Federal program questioned costs of that amount. Criteria - Title 2, Section 200.403, Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), provides that, for an expenditure to be allowable under Federal awards, costs must be necessary and reasonable for the performance of the Federal award and must be adequately documented. Title 2, Section 200.431, CFR, provides that the costs of fringe benefits, including employee insurance, are allowable provided that the benefits are reasonable and required by law, District-employee agreement, or an established policy of the District. Condition - For the 2023-24 fiscal year, the District provided an employee health insurance program as an employee fringe benefit for program participants and the Board authorized District contributions for individual and family coverage, including contributions for Federally funded employees.  The District recorded health insurance premium expenditures each pay period for each employee; however, several Federally funded employees did not participate in the health insurance program. Consequently, the Federal programs should not have incurred health insurance costs for those employees. Based on our discussions with District personnel and examination of District records, we found that the health insurance premium costs for Federally funded employees who did not participate in the health insurance program totaled $496,203. Cause - District personnel indicated that they did not monitor the health insurance program participants and related expenditures to ensure that the premium costs were only recorded for health insurance program participants. District personnel also agreed with the questioned costs calculations. Effect - The District did not comply with Federal regulations that require all Federal expenditures to represent reasonable and necessary charges. Consequently, the CNC incurred questioned costs totaling $306,926, the SEC incurred questioned costs totaling $108,444, and the Title I Program incurred questioned costs totaling $80,833. Recommendation - The District should establish effective procedures for monitoring the health insurance program participants and related expenditures to ensure that premium costs are only recorded for program participants. Also, the District should document to the respective grantors the allowability of the questioned costs totaling $496,203 or restore these moneys to the appropriate Federal programs. District Response - The District agrees with the finding. We will work with DOE and other district finance officers to ensure processes going forward are accurate and appropriate with no programs being overcharged.
Finding - The District charged Federal programs for health insurance program premium costs totaling $496,203 for several Federally funded employees who did not participate in the health insurance program, resulting in Federal program questioned costs of that amount. Criteria - Title 2, Section 200.403, Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), provides that, for an expenditure to be allowable under Federal awards, costs must be necessary and reasonable for the performance of the Federal award and must be adequately documented. Title 2, Section 200.431, CFR, provides that the costs of fringe benefits, including employee insurance, are allowable provided that the benefits are reasonable and required by law, District-employee agreement, or an established policy of the District. Condition - For the 2023-24 fiscal year, the District provided an employee health insurance program as an employee fringe benefit for program participants and the Board authorized District contributions for individual and family coverage, including contributions for Federally funded employees.  The District recorded health insurance premium expenditures each pay period for each employee; however, several Federally funded employees did not participate in the health insurance program. Consequently, the Federal programs should not have incurred health insurance costs for those employees. Based on our discussions with District personnel and examination of District records, we found that the health insurance premium costs for Federally funded employees who did not participate in the health insurance program totaled $496,203. Cause - District personnel indicated that they did not monitor the health insurance program participants and related expenditures to ensure that the premium costs were only recorded for health insurance program participants. District personnel also agreed with the questioned costs calculations. Effect - The District did not comply with Federal regulations that require all Federal expenditures to represent reasonable and necessary charges. Consequently, the CNC incurred questioned costs totaling $306,926, the SEC incurred questioned costs totaling $108,444, and the Title I Program incurred questioned costs totaling $80,833. Recommendation - The District should establish effective procedures for monitoring the health insurance program participants and related expenditures to ensure that premium costs are only recorded for program participants. Also, the District should document to the respective grantors the allowability of the questioned costs totaling $496,203 or restore these moneys to the appropriate Federal programs. District Response - The District agrees with the finding. We will work with DOE and other district finance officers to ensure processes going forward are accurate and appropriate with no programs being overcharged.
Finding - The District charged Federal programs for health insurance program premium costs totaling $496,203 for several Federally funded employees who did not participate in the health insurance program, resulting in Federal program questioned costs of that amount. Criteria - Title 2, Section 200.403, Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), provides that, for an expenditure to be allowable under Federal awards, costs must be necessary and reasonable for the performance of the Federal award and must be adequately documented. Title 2, Section 200.431, CFR, provides that the costs of fringe benefits, including employee insurance, are allowable provided that the benefits are reasonable and required by law, District-employee agreement, or an established policy of the District. Condition - For the 2023-24 fiscal year, the District provided an employee health insurance program as an employee fringe benefit for program participants and the Board authorized District contributions for individual and family coverage, including contributions for Federally funded employees.  The District recorded health insurance premium expenditures each pay period for each employee; however, several Federally funded employees did not participate in the health insurance program. Consequently, the Federal programs should not have incurred health insurance costs for those employees. Based on our discussions with District personnel and examination of District records, we found that the health insurance premium costs for Federally funded employees who did not participate in the health insurance program totaled $496,203. Cause - District personnel indicated that they did not monitor the health insurance program participants and related expenditures to ensure that the premium costs were only recorded for health insurance program participants. District personnel also agreed with the questioned costs calculations. Effect - The District did not comply with Federal regulations that require all Federal expenditures to represent reasonable and necessary charges. Consequently, the CNC incurred questioned costs totaling $306,926, the SEC incurred questioned costs totaling $108,444, and the Title I Program incurred questioned costs totaling $80,833. Recommendation - The District should establish effective procedures for monitoring the health insurance program participants and related expenditures to ensure that premium costs are only recorded for program participants. Also, the District should document to the respective grantors the allowability of the questioned costs totaling $496,203 or restore these moneys to the appropriate Federal programs. District Response - The District agrees with the finding. We will work with DOE and other district finance officers to ensure processes going forward are accurate and appropriate with no programs being overcharged.
Finding - The District charged Federal programs for health insurance program premium costs totaling $496,203 for several Federally funded employees who did not participate in the health insurance program, resulting in Federal program questioned costs of that amount. Criteria - Title 2, Section 200.403, Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), provides that, for an expenditure to be allowable under Federal awards, costs must be necessary and reasonable for the performance of the Federal award and must be adequately documented. Title 2, Section 200.431, CFR, provides that the costs of fringe benefits, including employee insurance, are allowable provided that the benefits are reasonable and required by law, District-employee agreement, or an established policy of the District. Condition - For the 2023-24 fiscal year, the District provided an employee health insurance program as an employee fringe benefit for program participants and the Board authorized District contributions for individual and family coverage, including contributions for Federally funded employees.  The District recorded health insurance premium expenditures each pay period for each employee; however, several Federally funded employees did not participate in the health insurance program. Consequently, the Federal programs should not have incurred health insurance costs for those employees. Based on our discussions with District personnel and examination of District records, we found that the health insurance premium costs for Federally funded employees who did not participate in the health insurance program totaled $496,203. Cause - District personnel indicated that they did not monitor the health insurance program participants and related expenditures to ensure that the premium costs were only recorded for health insurance program participants. District personnel also agreed with the questioned costs calculations. Effect - The District did not comply with Federal regulations that require all Federal expenditures to represent reasonable and necessary charges. Consequently, the CNC incurred questioned costs totaling $306,926, the SEC incurred questioned costs totaling $108,444, and the Title I Program incurred questioned costs totaling $80,833. Recommendation - The District should establish effective procedures for monitoring the health insurance program participants and related expenditures to ensure that premium costs are only recorded for program participants. Also, the District should document to the respective grantors the allowability of the questioned costs totaling $496,203 or restore these moneys to the appropriate Federal programs. District Response - The District agrees with the finding. We will work with DOE and other district finance officers to ensure processes going forward are accurate and appropriate with no programs being overcharged.