Audit 346180

FY End
2024-06-30
Total Expended
$4.47M
Findings
48
Programs
4
Year: 2024 Accepted: 2025-03-14
Auditor: 930623286

Organization Exclusion Status:

Checking exclusion status...

Findings

ID Ref Severity Repeat Requirement
528108 2024-001 - Yes N
528109 2024-001 - Yes N
528110 2024-001 - Yes N
528111 2024-001 - Yes N
528112 2024-001 - Yes N
528113 2024-001 - Yes N
528114 2024-001 - Yes N
528115 2024-001 - Yes N
528116 2024-001 - Yes N
528117 2024-001 - Yes N
528118 2024-001 - Yes N
528119 2024-001 - Yes N
528120 2024-002 - Yes B
528121 2024-002 - Yes B
528122 2024-002 - Yes B
528123 2024-002 - Yes B
528124 2024-002 - Yes B
528125 2024-002 - Yes B
528126 2024-002 - Yes B
528127 2024-002 - Yes B
528128 2024-002 - Yes B
528129 2024-002 - Yes B
528130 2024-002 - Yes B
528131 2024-002 - Yes B
1104550 2024-001 - Yes N
1104551 2024-001 - Yes N
1104552 2024-001 - Yes N
1104553 2024-001 - Yes N
1104554 2024-001 - Yes N
1104555 2024-001 - Yes N
1104556 2024-001 - Yes N
1104557 2024-001 - Yes N
1104558 2024-001 - Yes N
1104559 2024-001 - Yes N
1104560 2024-001 - Yes N
1104561 2024-001 - Yes N
1104562 2024-002 - Yes B
1104563 2024-002 - Yes B
1104564 2024-002 - Yes B
1104565 2024-002 - Yes B
1104566 2024-002 - Yes B
1104567 2024-002 - Yes B
1104568 2024-002 - Yes B
1104569 2024-002 - Yes B
1104570 2024-002 - Yes B
1104571 2024-002 - Yes B
1104572 2024-002 - Yes B
1104573 2024-002 - Yes B

Programs

ALN Program Spent Major Findings
14.218 Community Development Block Grants/entitlement Grants $390,399 - 0
21.027 Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds $250,000 - 0
14.239 Home Investment Partnerships Program $169,160 Yes 2
14.195 Project-Based Rental Assistance (pbra) $14,345 - 0

Contacts

Name Title Type
FM4KKNEARTL4 Steve Nass Auditee
5038567058 Andy Maffia Auditor
No contacts on file

Notes to SEFA

Title: Basis of Presentation Accounting Policies: Expenditures reported on the Schedule are reported on the accrual basis of accounting. Such expenditures are recognized following the cost principles contained in the Uniform Guidance wherein certain types of expenditures are not allowable or are limited as to reimbursement. Loan guarantees are reported in the Schedule at the beginning balance of each outstanding loan. De Minimis Rate Used: N Rate Explanation: The Organization does not use the 10% de minimus indirect cost rate as allowed under the Uniform Guidance, they use a negotiated rate, approved by the granting agency, for each grant. The accompanying schedule of expenditures of federal awards (the Schedule) includes the federal award activity of the Catholic Community Services Foundation (the Organization) under programs of the federal government for the year ended June 30, 2024. The information in this schedule is presented in accordance with the requirements of Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance). Because the Schedule presents only a selected portion of the operations of the Organization, it is not intended to and does not present the financial position, changes in net assets, or cash flows of the Organization.
Title: Summary of Significant Accounting Policies Accounting Policies: Expenditures reported on the Schedule are reported on the accrual basis of accounting. Such expenditures are recognized following the cost principles contained in the Uniform Guidance wherein certain types of expenditures are not allowable or are limited as to reimbursement. Loan guarantees are reported in the Schedule at the beginning balance of each outstanding loan. De Minimis Rate Used: N Rate Explanation: The Organization does not use the 10% de minimus indirect cost rate as allowed under the Uniform Guidance, they use a negotiated rate, approved by the granting agency, for each grant. Expenditures reported on the Schedule are reported on the accrual basis of accounting. Such expenditures are recognized following the cost principles contained in the Uniform Guidance wherein certain types of expenditures are not allowable or are limited as to reimbursement. Loan guarantees are reported in the Schedule at the beginning balance of each outstanding loan.
Title: Indirect Cost Rate Accounting Policies: Expenditures reported on the Schedule are reported on the accrual basis of accounting. Such expenditures are recognized following the cost principles contained in the Uniform Guidance wherein certain types of expenditures are not allowable or are limited as to reimbursement. Loan guarantees are reported in the Schedule at the beginning balance of each outstanding loan. De Minimis Rate Used: N Rate Explanation: The Organization does not use the 10% de minimus indirect cost rate as allowed under the Uniform Guidance, they use a negotiated rate, approved by the granting agency, for each grant. The Organization does not use the 10% de minimus indirect cost rate as allowed under the Uniform Guidance, they use a negotiated rate, approved by the granting agency, for each grant.
Title: Loans and Loan Guarantees Accounting Policies: Expenditures reported on the Schedule are reported on the accrual basis of accounting. Such expenditures are recognized following the cost principles contained in the Uniform Guidance wherein certain types of expenditures are not allowable or are limited as to reimbursement. Loan guarantees are reported in the Schedule at the beginning balance of each outstanding loan. De Minimis Rate Used: N Rate Explanation: The Organization does not use the 10% de minimus indirect cost rate as allowed under the Uniform Guidance, they use a negotiated rate, approved by the granting agency, for each grant. The Organization has forgivable loans that have continuing compliance requirements included in the Schedule. The ending balances of both the loans and the forgivable loans reported in the Schedule are as follows at June 30, 2024: Entitlement Grants Cluster: Community Development Block Grants/Entitlement Grants (ALN 14.218) - $390,399 HOME Investment Partnerships Program (ALN 14.239) - $3,477,560

Finding Details

Criteria: During the period of affordability (i.e., the period for which the non-Federal entity must maintain subsidized housing) for HOME-assisted rental housing, the participating jurisdiction must perform on-site inspections to determine compliance with property standards and verify the information submitted by the owners no less than: (a) every 3 years for projects containing 1 to 4 units, (b) every 2 years for projects containing 5 to 25 units, and (c) every year for projects containing 26 or more units. The participating jurisdiction must perform on-site inspections of rental housing occupied by tenants receiving HOME-assisted tenant-based rental assistance to determine compliance with housing quality standards (24 CFR 92.209(i), 92.251(f), and 92.504(d)). Condition: Of the 12 properties tested, 5 were out of compliance as an inspection should have been completed by October 2023, and 1 was out of compliance as an inspection should have been completed by September 2023. Cause: The Organization is responsible for contacting the City of Salem (the City) and Oregon Housing and Community Services (OHCS) to schedule the inspections timely, but there were delays caused by the COVID-19 Pandemic. Effect: Units could be out of compliance with housing quality standards. Questioned Costs: None Recommendations: We recommend the Organization set up a schedule and tracking system in order to contact the City and OHCS in advance of the due date of inspections in order to allow the City and OHCS sufficient time to complete the inspections timely. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: See corrective action plan included in report.
Criteria: During the period of affordability (i.e., the period for which the non-Federal entity must maintain subsidized housing) for HOME-assisted rental housing, the participating jurisdiction must perform on-site inspections to determine compliance with property standards and verify the information submitted by the owners no less than: (a) every 3 years for projects containing 1 to 4 units, (b) every 2 years for projects containing 5 to 25 units, and (c) every year for projects containing 26 or more units. The participating jurisdiction must perform on-site inspections of rental housing occupied by tenants receiving HOME-assisted tenant-based rental assistance to determine compliance with housing quality standards (24 CFR 92.209(i), 92.251(f), and 92.504(d)). Condition: Of the 12 properties tested, 5 were out of compliance as an inspection should have been completed by October 2023, and 1 was out of compliance as an inspection should have been completed by September 2023. Cause: The Organization is responsible for contacting the City of Salem (the City) and Oregon Housing and Community Services (OHCS) to schedule the inspections timely, but there were delays caused by the COVID-19 Pandemic. Effect: Units could be out of compliance with housing quality standards. Questioned Costs: None Recommendations: We recommend the Organization set up a schedule and tracking system in order to contact the City and OHCS in advance of the due date of inspections in order to allow the City and OHCS sufficient time to complete the inspections timely. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: See corrective action plan included in report.
Criteria: During the period of affordability (i.e., the period for which the non-Federal entity must maintain subsidized housing) for HOME-assisted rental housing, the participating jurisdiction must perform on-site inspections to determine compliance with property standards and verify the information submitted by the owners no less than: (a) every 3 years for projects containing 1 to 4 units, (b) every 2 years for projects containing 5 to 25 units, and (c) every year for projects containing 26 or more units. The participating jurisdiction must perform on-site inspections of rental housing occupied by tenants receiving HOME-assisted tenant-based rental assistance to determine compliance with housing quality standards (24 CFR 92.209(i), 92.251(f), and 92.504(d)). Condition: Of the 12 properties tested, 5 were out of compliance as an inspection should have been completed by October 2023, and 1 was out of compliance as an inspection should have been completed by September 2023. Cause: The Organization is responsible for contacting the City of Salem (the City) and Oregon Housing and Community Services (OHCS) to schedule the inspections timely, but there were delays caused by the COVID-19 Pandemic. Effect: Units could be out of compliance with housing quality standards. Questioned Costs: None Recommendations: We recommend the Organization set up a schedule and tracking system in order to contact the City and OHCS in advance of the due date of inspections in order to allow the City and OHCS sufficient time to complete the inspections timely. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: See corrective action plan included in report.
Criteria: During the period of affordability (i.e., the period for which the non-Federal entity must maintain subsidized housing) for HOME-assisted rental housing, the participating jurisdiction must perform on-site inspections to determine compliance with property standards and verify the information submitted by the owners no less than: (a) every 3 years for projects containing 1 to 4 units, (b) every 2 years for projects containing 5 to 25 units, and (c) every year for projects containing 26 or more units. The participating jurisdiction must perform on-site inspections of rental housing occupied by tenants receiving HOME-assisted tenant-based rental assistance to determine compliance with housing quality standards (24 CFR 92.209(i), 92.251(f), and 92.504(d)). Condition: Of the 12 properties tested, 5 were out of compliance as an inspection should have been completed by October 2023, and 1 was out of compliance as an inspection should have been completed by September 2023. Cause: The Organization is responsible for contacting the City of Salem (the City) and Oregon Housing and Community Services (OHCS) to schedule the inspections timely, but there were delays caused by the COVID-19 Pandemic. Effect: Units could be out of compliance with housing quality standards. Questioned Costs: None Recommendations: We recommend the Organization set up a schedule and tracking system in order to contact the City and OHCS in advance of the due date of inspections in order to allow the City and OHCS sufficient time to complete the inspections timely. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: See corrective action plan included in report.
Criteria: During the period of affordability (i.e., the period for which the non-Federal entity must maintain subsidized housing) for HOME-assisted rental housing, the participating jurisdiction must perform on-site inspections to determine compliance with property standards and verify the information submitted by the owners no less than: (a) every 3 years for projects containing 1 to 4 units, (b) every 2 years for projects containing 5 to 25 units, and (c) every year for projects containing 26 or more units. The participating jurisdiction must perform on-site inspections of rental housing occupied by tenants receiving HOME-assisted tenant-based rental assistance to determine compliance with housing quality standards (24 CFR 92.209(i), 92.251(f), and 92.504(d)). Condition: Of the 12 properties tested, 5 were out of compliance as an inspection should have been completed by October 2023, and 1 was out of compliance as an inspection should have been completed by September 2023. Cause: The Organization is responsible for contacting the City of Salem (the City) and Oregon Housing and Community Services (OHCS) to schedule the inspections timely, but there were delays caused by the COVID-19 Pandemic. Effect: Units could be out of compliance with housing quality standards. Questioned Costs: None Recommendations: We recommend the Organization set up a schedule and tracking system in order to contact the City and OHCS in advance of the due date of inspections in order to allow the City and OHCS sufficient time to complete the inspections timely. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: See corrective action plan included in report.
Criteria: During the period of affordability (i.e., the period for which the non-Federal entity must maintain subsidized housing) for HOME-assisted rental housing, the participating jurisdiction must perform on-site inspections to determine compliance with property standards and verify the information submitted by the owners no less than: (a) every 3 years for projects containing 1 to 4 units, (b) every 2 years for projects containing 5 to 25 units, and (c) every year for projects containing 26 or more units. The participating jurisdiction must perform on-site inspections of rental housing occupied by tenants receiving HOME-assisted tenant-based rental assistance to determine compliance with housing quality standards (24 CFR 92.209(i), 92.251(f), and 92.504(d)). Condition: Of the 12 properties tested, 5 were out of compliance as an inspection should have been completed by October 2023, and 1 was out of compliance as an inspection should have been completed by September 2023. Cause: The Organization is responsible for contacting the City of Salem (the City) and Oregon Housing and Community Services (OHCS) to schedule the inspections timely, but there were delays caused by the COVID-19 Pandemic. Effect: Units could be out of compliance with housing quality standards. Questioned Costs: None Recommendations: We recommend the Organization set up a schedule and tracking system in order to contact the City and OHCS in advance of the due date of inspections in order to allow the City and OHCS sufficient time to complete the inspections timely. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: See corrective action plan included in report.
Criteria: During the period of affordability (i.e., the period for which the non-Federal entity must maintain subsidized housing) for HOME-assisted rental housing, the participating jurisdiction must perform on-site inspections to determine compliance with property standards and verify the information submitted by the owners no less than: (a) every 3 years for projects containing 1 to 4 units, (b) every 2 years for projects containing 5 to 25 units, and (c) every year for projects containing 26 or more units. The participating jurisdiction must perform on-site inspections of rental housing occupied by tenants receiving HOME-assisted tenant-based rental assistance to determine compliance with housing quality standards (24 CFR 92.209(i), 92.251(f), and 92.504(d)). Condition: Of the 12 properties tested, 5 were out of compliance as an inspection should have been completed by October 2023, and 1 was out of compliance as an inspection should have been completed by September 2023. Cause: The Organization is responsible for contacting the City of Salem (the City) and Oregon Housing and Community Services (OHCS) to schedule the inspections timely, but there were delays caused by the COVID-19 Pandemic. Effect: Units could be out of compliance with housing quality standards. Questioned Costs: None Recommendations: We recommend the Organization set up a schedule and tracking system in order to contact the City and OHCS in advance of the due date of inspections in order to allow the City and OHCS sufficient time to complete the inspections timely. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: See corrective action plan included in report.
Criteria: During the period of affordability (i.e., the period for which the non-Federal entity must maintain subsidized housing) for HOME-assisted rental housing, the participating jurisdiction must perform on-site inspections to determine compliance with property standards and verify the information submitted by the owners no less than: (a) every 3 years for projects containing 1 to 4 units, (b) every 2 years for projects containing 5 to 25 units, and (c) every year for projects containing 26 or more units. The participating jurisdiction must perform on-site inspections of rental housing occupied by tenants receiving HOME-assisted tenant-based rental assistance to determine compliance with housing quality standards (24 CFR 92.209(i), 92.251(f), and 92.504(d)). Condition: Of the 12 properties tested, 5 were out of compliance as an inspection should have been completed by October 2023, and 1 was out of compliance as an inspection should have been completed by September 2023. Cause: The Organization is responsible for contacting the City of Salem (the City) and Oregon Housing and Community Services (OHCS) to schedule the inspections timely, but there were delays caused by the COVID-19 Pandemic. Effect: Units could be out of compliance with housing quality standards. Questioned Costs: None Recommendations: We recommend the Organization set up a schedule and tracking system in order to contact the City and OHCS in advance of the due date of inspections in order to allow the City and OHCS sufficient time to complete the inspections timely. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: See corrective action plan included in report.
Criteria: During the period of affordability (i.e., the period for which the non-Federal entity must maintain subsidized housing) for HOME-assisted rental housing, the participating jurisdiction must perform on-site inspections to determine compliance with property standards and verify the information submitted by the owners no less than: (a) every 3 years for projects containing 1 to 4 units, (b) every 2 years for projects containing 5 to 25 units, and (c) every year for projects containing 26 or more units. The participating jurisdiction must perform on-site inspections of rental housing occupied by tenants receiving HOME-assisted tenant-based rental assistance to determine compliance with housing quality standards (24 CFR 92.209(i), 92.251(f), and 92.504(d)). Condition: Of the 12 properties tested, 5 were out of compliance as an inspection should have been completed by October 2023, and 1 was out of compliance as an inspection should have been completed by September 2023. Cause: The Organization is responsible for contacting the City of Salem (the City) and Oregon Housing and Community Services (OHCS) to schedule the inspections timely, but there were delays caused by the COVID-19 Pandemic. Effect: Units could be out of compliance with housing quality standards. Questioned Costs: None Recommendations: We recommend the Organization set up a schedule and tracking system in order to contact the City and OHCS in advance of the due date of inspections in order to allow the City and OHCS sufficient time to complete the inspections timely. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: See corrective action plan included in report.
Criteria: During the period of affordability (i.e., the period for which the non-Federal entity must maintain subsidized housing) for HOME-assisted rental housing, the participating jurisdiction must perform on-site inspections to determine compliance with property standards and verify the information submitted by the owners no less than: (a) every 3 years for projects containing 1 to 4 units, (b) every 2 years for projects containing 5 to 25 units, and (c) every year for projects containing 26 or more units. The participating jurisdiction must perform on-site inspections of rental housing occupied by tenants receiving HOME-assisted tenant-based rental assistance to determine compliance with housing quality standards (24 CFR 92.209(i), 92.251(f), and 92.504(d)). Condition: Of the 12 properties tested, 5 were out of compliance as an inspection should have been completed by October 2023, and 1 was out of compliance as an inspection should have been completed by September 2023. Cause: The Organization is responsible for contacting the City of Salem (the City) and Oregon Housing and Community Services (OHCS) to schedule the inspections timely, but there were delays caused by the COVID-19 Pandemic. Effect: Units could be out of compliance with housing quality standards. Questioned Costs: None Recommendations: We recommend the Organization set up a schedule and tracking system in order to contact the City and OHCS in advance of the due date of inspections in order to allow the City and OHCS sufficient time to complete the inspections timely. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: See corrective action plan included in report.
Criteria: During the period of affordability (i.e., the period for which the non-Federal entity must maintain subsidized housing) for HOME-assisted rental housing, the participating jurisdiction must perform on-site inspections to determine compliance with property standards and verify the information submitted by the owners no less than: (a) every 3 years for projects containing 1 to 4 units, (b) every 2 years for projects containing 5 to 25 units, and (c) every year for projects containing 26 or more units. The participating jurisdiction must perform on-site inspections of rental housing occupied by tenants receiving HOME-assisted tenant-based rental assistance to determine compliance with housing quality standards (24 CFR 92.209(i), 92.251(f), and 92.504(d)). Condition: Of the 12 properties tested, 5 were out of compliance as an inspection should have been completed by October 2023, and 1 was out of compliance as an inspection should have been completed by September 2023. Cause: The Organization is responsible for contacting the City of Salem (the City) and Oregon Housing and Community Services (OHCS) to schedule the inspections timely, but there were delays caused by the COVID-19 Pandemic. Effect: Units could be out of compliance with housing quality standards. Questioned Costs: None Recommendations: We recommend the Organization set up a schedule and tracking system in order to contact the City and OHCS in advance of the due date of inspections in order to allow the City and OHCS sufficient time to complete the inspections timely. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: See corrective action plan included in report.
Criteria: During the period of affordability (i.e., the period for which the non-Federal entity must maintain subsidized housing) for HOME-assisted rental housing, the participating jurisdiction must perform on-site inspections to determine compliance with property standards and verify the information submitted by the owners no less than: (a) every 3 years for projects containing 1 to 4 units, (b) every 2 years for projects containing 5 to 25 units, and (c) every year for projects containing 26 or more units. The participating jurisdiction must perform on-site inspections of rental housing occupied by tenants receiving HOME-assisted tenant-based rental assistance to determine compliance with housing quality standards (24 CFR 92.209(i), 92.251(f), and 92.504(d)). Condition: Of the 12 properties tested, 5 were out of compliance as an inspection should have been completed by October 2023, and 1 was out of compliance as an inspection should have been completed by September 2023. Cause: The Organization is responsible for contacting the City of Salem (the City) and Oregon Housing and Community Services (OHCS) to schedule the inspections timely, but there were delays caused by the COVID-19 Pandemic. Effect: Units could be out of compliance with housing quality standards. Questioned Costs: None Recommendations: We recommend the Organization set up a schedule and tracking system in order to contact the City and OHCS in advance of the due date of inspections in order to allow the City and OHCS sufficient time to complete the inspections timely. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: See corrective action plan included in report.
Criteria: 2 CFR Part 92.209(h) establishes the maximum subsidy that a participating Organization may pay to, or on behalf of a family. The Organization must also establish a “minimum tenant contribution to rent.” Condition: The Organization established the maximum subsidy and the minimum tenant contribution to rent for a tenant during the fiscal year, but the amount actually charged to the tenant was different than the amount calculated. Cause: The Organization utilized a third-party provider during the year, and new recertifications were completed by the provider. However, for the one home identified, the rent for a tenant did not agree to the minimum tenant contribution to rent. Effect: One tenant was charged less rent than they should have been. Questioned Costs: None Recommendations: The Organization should charge tenants rent based on the minimum tenant contribution to rent, which is calculated annually as a part of the recertification process. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: See corrective action plan included in report.
Criteria: 2 CFR Part 92.209(h) establishes the maximum subsidy that a participating Organization may pay to, or on behalf of a family. The Organization must also establish a “minimum tenant contribution to rent.” Condition: The Organization established the maximum subsidy and the minimum tenant contribution to rent for a tenant during the fiscal year, but the amount actually charged to the tenant was different than the amount calculated. Cause: The Organization utilized a third-party provider during the year, and new recertifications were completed by the provider. However, for the one home identified, the rent for a tenant did not agree to the minimum tenant contribution to rent. Effect: One tenant was charged less rent than they should have been. Questioned Costs: None Recommendations: The Organization should charge tenants rent based on the minimum tenant contribution to rent, which is calculated annually as a part of the recertification process. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: See corrective action plan included in report.
Criteria: 2 CFR Part 92.209(h) establishes the maximum subsidy that a participating Organization may pay to, or on behalf of a family. The Organization must also establish a “minimum tenant contribution to rent.” Condition: The Organization established the maximum subsidy and the minimum tenant contribution to rent for a tenant during the fiscal year, but the amount actually charged to the tenant was different than the amount calculated. Cause: The Organization utilized a third-party provider during the year, and new recertifications were completed by the provider. However, for the one home identified, the rent for a tenant did not agree to the minimum tenant contribution to rent. Effect: One tenant was charged less rent than they should have been. Questioned Costs: None Recommendations: The Organization should charge tenants rent based on the minimum tenant contribution to rent, which is calculated annually as a part of the recertification process. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: See corrective action plan included in report.
Criteria: 2 CFR Part 92.209(h) establishes the maximum subsidy that a participating Organization may pay to, or on behalf of a family. The Organization must also establish a “minimum tenant contribution to rent.” Condition: The Organization established the maximum subsidy and the minimum tenant contribution to rent for a tenant during the fiscal year, but the amount actually charged to the tenant was different than the amount calculated. Cause: The Organization utilized a third-party provider during the year, and new recertifications were completed by the provider. However, for the one home identified, the rent for a tenant did not agree to the minimum tenant contribution to rent. Effect: One tenant was charged less rent than they should have been. Questioned Costs: None Recommendations: The Organization should charge tenants rent based on the minimum tenant contribution to rent, which is calculated annually as a part of the recertification process. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: See corrective action plan included in report.
Criteria: 2 CFR Part 92.209(h) establishes the maximum subsidy that a participating Organization may pay to, or on behalf of a family. The Organization must also establish a “minimum tenant contribution to rent.” Condition: The Organization established the maximum subsidy and the minimum tenant contribution to rent for a tenant during the fiscal year, but the amount actually charged to the tenant was different than the amount calculated. Cause: The Organization utilized a third-party provider during the year, and new recertifications were completed by the provider. However, for the one home identified, the rent for a tenant did not agree to the minimum tenant contribution to rent. Effect: One tenant was charged less rent than they should have been. Questioned Costs: None Recommendations: The Organization should charge tenants rent based on the minimum tenant contribution to rent, which is calculated annually as a part of the recertification process. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: See corrective action plan included in report.
Criteria: 2 CFR Part 92.209(h) establishes the maximum subsidy that a participating Organization may pay to, or on behalf of a family. The Organization must also establish a “minimum tenant contribution to rent.” Condition: The Organization established the maximum subsidy and the minimum tenant contribution to rent for a tenant during the fiscal year, but the amount actually charged to the tenant was different than the amount calculated. Cause: The Organization utilized a third-party provider during the year, and new recertifications were completed by the provider. However, for the one home identified, the rent for a tenant did not agree to the minimum tenant contribution to rent. Effect: One tenant was charged less rent than they should have been. Questioned Costs: None Recommendations: The Organization should charge tenants rent based on the minimum tenant contribution to rent, which is calculated annually as a part of the recertification process. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: See corrective action plan included in report.
Criteria: 2 CFR Part 92.209(h) establishes the maximum subsidy that a participating Organization may pay to, or on behalf of a family. The Organization must also establish a “minimum tenant contribution to rent.” Condition: The Organization established the maximum subsidy and the minimum tenant contribution to rent for a tenant during the fiscal year, but the amount actually charged to the tenant was different than the amount calculated. Cause: The Organization utilized a third-party provider during the year, and new recertifications were completed by the provider. However, for the one home identified, the rent for a tenant did not agree to the minimum tenant contribution to rent. Effect: One tenant was charged less rent than they should have been. Questioned Costs: None Recommendations: The Organization should charge tenants rent based on the minimum tenant contribution to rent, which is calculated annually as a part of the recertification process. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: See corrective action plan included in report.
Criteria: 2 CFR Part 92.209(h) establishes the maximum subsidy that a participating Organization may pay to, or on behalf of a family. The Organization must also establish a “minimum tenant contribution to rent.” Condition: The Organization established the maximum subsidy and the minimum tenant contribution to rent for a tenant during the fiscal year, but the amount actually charged to the tenant was different than the amount calculated. Cause: The Organization utilized a third-party provider during the year, and new recertifications were completed by the provider. However, for the one home identified, the rent for a tenant did not agree to the minimum tenant contribution to rent. Effect: One tenant was charged less rent than they should have been. Questioned Costs: None Recommendations: The Organization should charge tenants rent based on the minimum tenant contribution to rent, which is calculated annually as a part of the recertification process. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: See corrective action plan included in report.
Criteria: 2 CFR Part 92.209(h) establishes the maximum subsidy that a participating Organization may pay to, or on behalf of a family. The Organization must also establish a “minimum tenant contribution to rent.” Condition: The Organization established the maximum subsidy and the minimum tenant contribution to rent for a tenant during the fiscal year, but the amount actually charged to the tenant was different than the amount calculated. Cause: The Organization utilized a third-party provider during the year, and new recertifications were completed by the provider. However, for the one home identified, the rent for a tenant did not agree to the minimum tenant contribution to rent. Effect: One tenant was charged less rent than they should have been. Questioned Costs: None Recommendations: The Organization should charge tenants rent based on the minimum tenant contribution to rent, which is calculated annually as a part of the recertification process. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: See corrective action plan included in report.
Criteria: 2 CFR Part 92.209(h) establishes the maximum subsidy that a participating Organization may pay to, or on behalf of a family. The Organization must also establish a “minimum tenant contribution to rent.” Condition: The Organization established the maximum subsidy and the minimum tenant contribution to rent for a tenant during the fiscal year, but the amount actually charged to the tenant was different than the amount calculated. Cause: The Organization utilized a third-party provider during the year, and new recertifications were completed by the provider. However, for the one home identified, the rent for a tenant did not agree to the minimum tenant contribution to rent. Effect: One tenant was charged less rent than they should have been. Questioned Costs: None Recommendations: The Organization should charge tenants rent based on the minimum tenant contribution to rent, which is calculated annually as a part of the recertification process. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: See corrective action plan included in report.
Criteria: 2 CFR Part 92.209(h) establishes the maximum subsidy that a participating Organization may pay to, or on behalf of a family. The Organization must also establish a “minimum tenant contribution to rent.” Condition: The Organization established the maximum subsidy and the minimum tenant contribution to rent for a tenant during the fiscal year, but the amount actually charged to the tenant was different than the amount calculated. Cause: The Organization utilized a third-party provider during the year, and new recertifications were completed by the provider. However, for the one home identified, the rent for a tenant did not agree to the minimum tenant contribution to rent. Effect: One tenant was charged less rent than they should have been. Questioned Costs: None Recommendations: The Organization should charge tenants rent based on the minimum tenant contribution to rent, which is calculated annually as a part of the recertification process. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: See corrective action plan included in report.
Criteria: 2 CFR Part 92.209(h) establishes the maximum subsidy that a participating Organization may pay to, or on behalf of a family. The Organization must also establish a “minimum tenant contribution to rent.” Condition: The Organization established the maximum subsidy and the minimum tenant contribution to rent for a tenant during the fiscal year, but the amount actually charged to the tenant was different than the amount calculated. Cause: The Organization utilized a third-party provider during the year, and new recertifications were completed by the provider. However, for the one home identified, the rent for a tenant did not agree to the minimum tenant contribution to rent. Effect: One tenant was charged less rent than they should have been. Questioned Costs: None Recommendations: The Organization should charge tenants rent based on the minimum tenant contribution to rent, which is calculated annually as a part of the recertification process. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: See corrective action plan included in report.
Criteria: During the period of affordability (i.e., the period for which the non-Federal entity must maintain subsidized housing) for HOME-assisted rental housing, the participating jurisdiction must perform on-site inspections to determine compliance with property standards and verify the information submitted by the owners no less than: (a) every 3 years for projects containing 1 to 4 units, (b) every 2 years for projects containing 5 to 25 units, and (c) every year for projects containing 26 or more units. The participating jurisdiction must perform on-site inspections of rental housing occupied by tenants receiving HOME-assisted tenant-based rental assistance to determine compliance with housing quality standards (24 CFR 92.209(i), 92.251(f), and 92.504(d)). Condition: Of the 12 properties tested, 5 were out of compliance as an inspection should have been completed by October 2023, and 1 was out of compliance as an inspection should have been completed by September 2023. Cause: The Organization is responsible for contacting the City of Salem (the City) and Oregon Housing and Community Services (OHCS) to schedule the inspections timely, but there were delays caused by the COVID-19 Pandemic. Effect: Units could be out of compliance with housing quality standards. Questioned Costs: None Recommendations: We recommend the Organization set up a schedule and tracking system in order to contact the City and OHCS in advance of the due date of inspections in order to allow the City and OHCS sufficient time to complete the inspections timely. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: See corrective action plan included in report.
Criteria: During the period of affordability (i.e., the period for which the non-Federal entity must maintain subsidized housing) for HOME-assisted rental housing, the participating jurisdiction must perform on-site inspections to determine compliance with property standards and verify the information submitted by the owners no less than: (a) every 3 years for projects containing 1 to 4 units, (b) every 2 years for projects containing 5 to 25 units, and (c) every year for projects containing 26 or more units. The participating jurisdiction must perform on-site inspections of rental housing occupied by tenants receiving HOME-assisted tenant-based rental assistance to determine compliance with housing quality standards (24 CFR 92.209(i), 92.251(f), and 92.504(d)). Condition: Of the 12 properties tested, 5 were out of compliance as an inspection should have been completed by October 2023, and 1 was out of compliance as an inspection should have been completed by September 2023. Cause: The Organization is responsible for contacting the City of Salem (the City) and Oregon Housing and Community Services (OHCS) to schedule the inspections timely, but there were delays caused by the COVID-19 Pandemic. Effect: Units could be out of compliance with housing quality standards. Questioned Costs: None Recommendations: We recommend the Organization set up a schedule and tracking system in order to contact the City and OHCS in advance of the due date of inspections in order to allow the City and OHCS sufficient time to complete the inspections timely. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: See corrective action plan included in report.
Criteria: During the period of affordability (i.e., the period for which the non-Federal entity must maintain subsidized housing) for HOME-assisted rental housing, the participating jurisdiction must perform on-site inspections to determine compliance with property standards and verify the information submitted by the owners no less than: (a) every 3 years for projects containing 1 to 4 units, (b) every 2 years for projects containing 5 to 25 units, and (c) every year for projects containing 26 or more units. The participating jurisdiction must perform on-site inspections of rental housing occupied by tenants receiving HOME-assisted tenant-based rental assistance to determine compliance with housing quality standards (24 CFR 92.209(i), 92.251(f), and 92.504(d)). Condition: Of the 12 properties tested, 5 were out of compliance as an inspection should have been completed by October 2023, and 1 was out of compliance as an inspection should have been completed by September 2023. Cause: The Organization is responsible for contacting the City of Salem (the City) and Oregon Housing and Community Services (OHCS) to schedule the inspections timely, but there were delays caused by the COVID-19 Pandemic. Effect: Units could be out of compliance with housing quality standards. Questioned Costs: None Recommendations: We recommend the Organization set up a schedule and tracking system in order to contact the City and OHCS in advance of the due date of inspections in order to allow the City and OHCS sufficient time to complete the inspections timely. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: See corrective action plan included in report.
Criteria: During the period of affordability (i.e., the period for which the non-Federal entity must maintain subsidized housing) for HOME-assisted rental housing, the participating jurisdiction must perform on-site inspections to determine compliance with property standards and verify the information submitted by the owners no less than: (a) every 3 years for projects containing 1 to 4 units, (b) every 2 years for projects containing 5 to 25 units, and (c) every year for projects containing 26 or more units. The participating jurisdiction must perform on-site inspections of rental housing occupied by tenants receiving HOME-assisted tenant-based rental assistance to determine compliance with housing quality standards (24 CFR 92.209(i), 92.251(f), and 92.504(d)). Condition: Of the 12 properties tested, 5 were out of compliance as an inspection should have been completed by October 2023, and 1 was out of compliance as an inspection should have been completed by September 2023. Cause: The Organization is responsible for contacting the City of Salem (the City) and Oregon Housing and Community Services (OHCS) to schedule the inspections timely, but there were delays caused by the COVID-19 Pandemic. Effect: Units could be out of compliance with housing quality standards. Questioned Costs: None Recommendations: We recommend the Organization set up a schedule and tracking system in order to contact the City and OHCS in advance of the due date of inspections in order to allow the City and OHCS sufficient time to complete the inspections timely. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: See corrective action plan included in report.
Criteria: During the period of affordability (i.e., the period for which the non-Federal entity must maintain subsidized housing) for HOME-assisted rental housing, the participating jurisdiction must perform on-site inspections to determine compliance with property standards and verify the information submitted by the owners no less than: (a) every 3 years for projects containing 1 to 4 units, (b) every 2 years for projects containing 5 to 25 units, and (c) every year for projects containing 26 or more units. The participating jurisdiction must perform on-site inspections of rental housing occupied by tenants receiving HOME-assisted tenant-based rental assistance to determine compliance with housing quality standards (24 CFR 92.209(i), 92.251(f), and 92.504(d)). Condition: Of the 12 properties tested, 5 were out of compliance as an inspection should have been completed by October 2023, and 1 was out of compliance as an inspection should have been completed by September 2023. Cause: The Organization is responsible for contacting the City of Salem (the City) and Oregon Housing and Community Services (OHCS) to schedule the inspections timely, but there were delays caused by the COVID-19 Pandemic. Effect: Units could be out of compliance with housing quality standards. Questioned Costs: None Recommendations: We recommend the Organization set up a schedule and tracking system in order to contact the City and OHCS in advance of the due date of inspections in order to allow the City and OHCS sufficient time to complete the inspections timely. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: See corrective action plan included in report.
Criteria: During the period of affordability (i.e., the period for which the non-Federal entity must maintain subsidized housing) for HOME-assisted rental housing, the participating jurisdiction must perform on-site inspections to determine compliance with property standards and verify the information submitted by the owners no less than: (a) every 3 years for projects containing 1 to 4 units, (b) every 2 years for projects containing 5 to 25 units, and (c) every year for projects containing 26 or more units. The participating jurisdiction must perform on-site inspections of rental housing occupied by tenants receiving HOME-assisted tenant-based rental assistance to determine compliance with housing quality standards (24 CFR 92.209(i), 92.251(f), and 92.504(d)). Condition: Of the 12 properties tested, 5 were out of compliance as an inspection should have been completed by October 2023, and 1 was out of compliance as an inspection should have been completed by September 2023. Cause: The Organization is responsible for contacting the City of Salem (the City) and Oregon Housing and Community Services (OHCS) to schedule the inspections timely, but there were delays caused by the COVID-19 Pandemic. Effect: Units could be out of compliance with housing quality standards. Questioned Costs: None Recommendations: We recommend the Organization set up a schedule and tracking system in order to contact the City and OHCS in advance of the due date of inspections in order to allow the City and OHCS sufficient time to complete the inspections timely. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: See corrective action plan included in report.
Criteria: During the period of affordability (i.e., the period for which the non-Federal entity must maintain subsidized housing) for HOME-assisted rental housing, the participating jurisdiction must perform on-site inspections to determine compliance with property standards and verify the information submitted by the owners no less than: (a) every 3 years for projects containing 1 to 4 units, (b) every 2 years for projects containing 5 to 25 units, and (c) every year for projects containing 26 or more units. The participating jurisdiction must perform on-site inspections of rental housing occupied by tenants receiving HOME-assisted tenant-based rental assistance to determine compliance with housing quality standards (24 CFR 92.209(i), 92.251(f), and 92.504(d)). Condition: Of the 12 properties tested, 5 were out of compliance as an inspection should have been completed by October 2023, and 1 was out of compliance as an inspection should have been completed by September 2023. Cause: The Organization is responsible for contacting the City of Salem (the City) and Oregon Housing and Community Services (OHCS) to schedule the inspections timely, but there were delays caused by the COVID-19 Pandemic. Effect: Units could be out of compliance with housing quality standards. Questioned Costs: None Recommendations: We recommend the Organization set up a schedule and tracking system in order to contact the City and OHCS in advance of the due date of inspections in order to allow the City and OHCS sufficient time to complete the inspections timely. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: See corrective action plan included in report.
Criteria: During the period of affordability (i.e., the period for which the non-Federal entity must maintain subsidized housing) for HOME-assisted rental housing, the participating jurisdiction must perform on-site inspections to determine compliance with property standards and verify the information submitted by the owners no less than: (a) every 3 years for projects containing 1 to 4 units, (b) every 2 years for projects containing 5 to 25 units, and (c) every year for projects containing 26 or more units. The participating jurisdiction must perform on-site inspections of rental housing occupied by tenants receiving HOME-assisted tenant-based rental assistance to determine compliance with housing quality standards (24 CFR 92.209(i), 92.251(f), and 92.504(d)). Condition: Of the 12 properties tested, 5 were out of compliance as an inspection should have been completed by October 2023, and 1 was out of compliance as an inspection should have been completed by September 2023. Cause: The Organization is responsible for contacting the City of Salem (the City) and Oregon Housing and Community Services (OHCS) to schedule the inspections timely, but there were delays caused by the COVID-19 Pandemic. Effect: Units could be out of compliance with housing quality standards. Questioned Costs: None Recommendations: We recommend the Organization set up a schedule and tracking system in order to contact the City and OHCS in advance of the due date of inspections in order to allow the City and OHCS sufficient time to complete the inspections timely. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: See corrective action plan included in report.
Criteria: During the period of affordability (i.e., the period for which the non-Federal entity must maintain subsidized housing) for HOME-assisted rental housing, the participating jurisdiction must perform on-site inspections to determine compliance with property standards and verify the information submitted by the owners no less than: (a) every 3 years for projects containing 1 to 4 units, (b) every 2 years for projects containing 5 to 25 units, and (c) every year for projects containing 26 or more units. The participating jurisdiction must perform on-site inspections of rental housing occupied by tenants receiving HOME-assisted tenant-based rental assistance to determine compliance with housing quality standards (24 CFR 92.209(i), 92.251(f), and 92.504(d)). Condition: Of the 12 properties tested, 5 were out of compliance as an inspection should have been completed by October 2023, and 1 was out of compliance as an inspection should have been completed by September 2023. Cause: The Organization is responsible for contacting the City of Salem (the City) and Oregon Housing and Community Services (OHCS) to schedule the inspections timely, but there were delays caused by the COVID-19 Pandemic. Effect: Units could be out of compliance with housing quality standards. Questioned Costs: None Recommendations: We recommend the Organization set up a schedule and tracking system in order to contact the City and OHCS in advance of the due date of inspections in order to allow the City and OHCS sufficient time to complete the inspections timely. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: See corrective action plan included in report.
Criteria: During the period of affordability (i.e., the period for which the non-Federal entity must maintain subsidized housing) for HOME-assisted rental housing, the participating jurisdiction must perform on-site inspections to determine compliance with property standards and verify the information submitted by the owners no less than: (a) every 3 years for projects containing 1 to 4 units, (b) every 2 years for projects containing 5 to 25 units, and (c) every year for projects containing 26 or more units. The participating jurisdiction must perform on-site inspections of rental housing occupied by tenants receiving HOME-assisted tenant-based rental assistance to determine compliance with housing quality standards (24 CFR 92.209(i), 92.251(f), and 92.504(d)). Condition: Of the 12 properties tested, 5 were out of compliance as an inspection should have been completed by October 2023, and 1 was out of compliance as an inspection should have been completed by September 2023. Cause: The Organization is responsible for contacting the City of Salem (the City) and Oregon Housing and Community Services (OHCS) to schedule the inspections timely, but there were delays caused by the COVID-19 Pandemic. Effect: Units could be out of compliance with housing quality standards. Questioned Costs: None Recommendations: We recommend the Organization set up a schedule and tracking system in order to contact the City and OHCS in advance of the due date of inspections in order to allow the City and OHCS sufficient time to complete the inspections timely. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: See corrective action plan included in report.
Criteria: During the period of affordability (i.e., the period for which the non-Federal entity must maintain subsidized housing) for HOME-assisted rental housing, the participating jurisdiction must perform on-site inspections to determine compliance with property standards and verify the information submitted by the owners no less than: (a) every 3 years for projects containing 1 to 4 units, (b) every 2 years for projects containing 5 to 25 units, and (c) every year for projects containing 26 or more units. The participating jurisdiction must perform on-site inspections of rental housing occupied by tenants receiving HOME-assisted tenant-based rental assistance to determine compliance with housing quality standards (24 CFR 92.209(i), 92.251(f), and 92.504(d)). Condition: Of the 12 properties tested, 5 were out of compliance as an inspection should have been completed by October 2023, and 1 was out of compliance as an inspection should have been completed by September 2023. Cause: The Organization is responsible for contacting the City of Salem (the City) and Oregon Housing and Community Services (OHCS) to schedule the inspections timely, but there were delays caused by the COVID-19 Pandemic. Effect: Units could be out of compliance with housing quality standards. Questioned Costs: None Recommendations: We recommend the Organization set up a schedule and tracking system in order to contact the City and OHCS in advance of the due date of inspections in order to allow the City and OHCS sufficient time to complete the inspections timely. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: See corrective action plan included in report.
Criteria: During the period of affordability (i.e., the period for which the non-Federal entity must maintain subsidized housing) for HOME-assisted rental housing, the participating jurisdiction must perform on-site inspections to determine compliance with property standards and verify the information submitted by the owners no less than: (a) every 3 years for projects containing 1 to 4 units, (b) every 2 years for projects containing 5 to 25 units, and (c) every year for projects containing 26 or more units. The participating jurisdiction must perform on-site inspections of rental housing occupied by tenants receiving HOME-assisted tenant-based rental assistance to determine compliance with housing quality standards (24 CFR 92.209(i), 92.251(f), and 92.504(d)). Condition: Of the 12 properties tested, 5 were out of compliance as an inspection should have been completed by October 2023, and 1 was out of compliance as an inspection should have been completed by September 2023. Cause: The Organization is responsible for contacting the City of Salem (the City) and Oregon Housing and Community Services (OHCS) to schedule the inspections timely, but there were delays caused by the COVID-19 Pandemic. Effect: Units could be out of compliance with housing quality standards. Questioned Costs: None Recommendations: We recommend the Organization set up a schedule and tracking system in order to contact the City and OHCS in advance of the due date of inspections in order to allow the City and OHCS sufficient time to complete the inspections timely. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: See corrective action plan included in report.
Criteria: 2 CFR Part 92.209(h) establishes the maximum subsidy that a participating Organization may pay to, or on behalf of a family. The Organization must also establish a “minimum tenant contribution to rent.” Condition: The Organization established the maximum subsidy and the minimum tenant contribution to rent for a tenant during the fiscal year, but the amount actually charged to the tenant was different than the amount calculated. Cause: The Organization utilized a third-party provider during the year, and new recertifications were completed by the provider. However, for the one home identified, the rent for a tenant did not agree to the minimum tenant contribution to rent. Effect: One tenant was charged less rent than they should have been. Questioned Costs: None Recommendations: The Organization should charge tenants rent based on the minimum tenant contribution to rent, which is calculated annually as a part of the recertification process. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: See corrective action plan included in report.
Criteria: 2 CFR Part 92.209(h) establishes the maximum subsidy that a participating Organization may pay to, or on behalf of a family. The Organization must also establish a “minimum tenant contribution to rent.” Condition: The Organization established the maximum subsidy and the minimum tenant contribution to rent for a tenant during the fiscal year, but the amount actually charged to the tenant was different than the amount calculated. Cause: The Organization utilized a third-party provider during the year, and new recertifications were completed by the provider. However, for the one home identified, the rent for a tenant did not agree to the minimum tenant contribution to rent. Effect: One tenant was charged less rent than they should have been. Questioned Costs: None Recommendations: The Organization should charge tenants rent based on the minimum tenant contribution to rent, which is calculated annually as a part of the recertification process. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: See corrective action plan included in report.
Criteria: 2 CFR Part 92.209(h) establishes the maximum subsidy that a participating Organization may pay to, or on behalf of a family. The Organization must also establish a “minimum tenant contribution to rent.” Condition: The Organization established the maximum subsidy and the minimum tenant contribution to rent for a tenant during the fiscal year, but the amount actually charged to the tenant was different than the amount calculated. Cause: The Organization utilized a third-party provider during the year, and new recertifications were completed by the provider. However, for the one home identified, the rent for a tenant did not agree to the minimum tenant contribution to rent. Effect: One tenant was charged less rent than they should have been. Questioned Costs: None Recommendations: The Organization should charge tenants rent based on the minimum tenant contribution to rent, which is calculated annually as a part of the recertification process. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: See corrective action plan included in report.
Criteria: 2 CFR Part 92.209(h) establishes the maximum subsidy that a participating Organization may pay to, or on behalf of a family. The Organization must also establish a “minimum tenant contribution to rent.” Condition: The Organization established the maximum subsidy and the minimum tenant contribution to rent for a tenant during the fiscal year, but the amount actually charged to the tenant was different than the amount calculated. Cause: The Organization utilized a third-party provider during the year, and new recertifications were completed by the provider. However, for the one home identified, the rent for a tenant did not agree to the minimum tenant contribution to rent. Effect: One tenant was charged less rent than they should have been. Questioned Costs: None Recommendations: The Organization should charge tenants rent based on the minimum tenant contribution to rent, which is calculated annually as a part of the recertification process. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: See corrective action plan included in report.
Criteria: 2 CFR Part 92.209(h) establishes the maximum subsidy that a participating Organization may pay to, or on behalf of a family. The Organization must also establish a “minimum tenant contribution to rent.” Condition: The Organization established the maximum subsidy and the minimum tenant contribution to rent for a tenant during the fiscal year, but the amount actually charged to the tenant was different than the amount calculated. Cause: The Organization utilized a third-party provider during the year, and new recertifications were completed by the provider. However, for the one home identified, the rent for a tenant did not agree to the minimum tenant contribution to rent. Effect: One tenant was charged less rent than they should have been. Questioned Costs: None Recommendations: The Organization should charge tenants rent based on the minimum tenant contribution to rent, which is calculated annually as a part of the recertification process. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: See corrective action plan included in report.
Criteria: 2 CFR Part 92.209(h) establishes the maximum subsidy that a participating Organization may pay to, or on behalf of a family. The Organization must also establish a “minimum tenant contribution to rent.” Condition: The Organization established the maximum subsidy and the minimum tenant contribution to rent for a tenant during the fiscal year, but the amount actually charged to the tenant was different than the amount calculated. Cause: The Organization utilized a third-party provider during the year, and new recertifications were completed by the provider. However, for the one home identified, the rent for a tenant did not agree to the minimum tenant contribution to rent. Effect: One tenant was charged less rent than they should have been. Questioned Costs: None Recommendations: The Organization should charge tenants rent based on the minimum tenant contribution to rent, which is calculated annually as a part of the recertification process. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: See corrective action plan included in report.
Criteria: 2 CFR Part 92.209(h) establishes the maximum subsidy that a participating Organization may pay to, or on behalf of a family. The Organization must also establish a “minimum tenant contribution to rent.” Condition: The Organization established the maximum subsidy and the minimum tenant contribution to rent for a tenant during the fiscal year, but the amount actually charged to the tenant was different than the amount calculated. Cause: The Organization utilized a third-party provider during the year, and new recertifications were completed by the provider. However, for the one home identified, the rent for a tenant did not agree to the minimum tenant contribution to rent. Effect: One tenant was charged less rent than they should have been. Questioned Costs: None Recommendations: The Organization should charge tenants rent based on the minimum tenant contribution to rent, which is calculated annually as a part of the recertification process. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: See corrective action plan included in report.
Criteria: 2 CFR Part 92.209(h) establishes the maximum subsidy that a participating Organization may pay to, or on behalf of a family. The Organization must also establish a “minimum tenant contribution to rent.” Condition: The Organization established the maximum subsidy and the minimum tenant contribution to rent for a tenant during the fiscal year, but the amount actually charged to the tenant was different than the amount calculated. Cause: The Organization utilized a third-party provider during the year, and new recertifications were completed by the provider. However, for the one home identified, the rent for a tenant did not agree to the minimum tenant contribution to rent. Effect: One tenant was charged less rent than they should have been. Questioned Costs: None Recommendations: The Organization should charge tenants rent based on the minimum tenant contribution to rent, which is calculated annually as a part of the recertification process. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: See corrective action plan included in report.
Criteria: 2 CFR Part 92.209(h) establishes the maximum subsidy that a participating Organization may pay to, or on behalf of a family. The Organization must also establish a “minimum tenant contribution to rent.” Condition: The Organization established the maximum subsidy and the minimum tenant contribution to rent for a tenant during the fiscal year, but the amount actually charged to the tenant was different than the amount calculated. Cause: The Organization utilized a third-party provider during the year, and new recertifications were completed by the provider. However, for the one home identified, the rent for a tenant did not agree to the minimum tenant contribution to rent. Effect: One tenant was charged less rent than they should have been. Questioned Costs: None Recommendations: The Organization should charge tenants rent based on the minimum tenant contribution to rent, which is calculated annually as a part of the recertification process. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: See corrective action plan included in report.
Criteria: 2 CFR Part 92.209(h) establishes the maximum subsidy that a participating Organization may pay to, or on behalf of a family. The Organization must also establish a “minimum tenant contribution to rent.” Condition: The Organization established the maximum subsidy and the minimum tenant contribution to rent for a tenant during the fiscal year, but the amount actually charged to the tenant was different than the amount calculated. Cause: The Organization utilized a third-party provider during the year, and new recertifications were completed by the provider. However, for the one home identified, the rent for a tenant did not agree to the minimum tenant contribution to rent. Effect: One tenant was charged less rent than they should have been. Questioned Costs: None Recommendations: The Organization should charge tenants rent based on the minimum tenant contribution to rent, which is calculated annually as a part of the recertification process. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: See corrective action plan included in report.
Criteria: 2 CFR Part 92.209(h) establishes the maximum subsidy that a participating Organization may pay to, or on behalf of a family. The Organization must also establish a “minimum tenant contribution to rent.” Condition: The Organization established the maximum subsidy and the minimum tenant contribution to rent for a tenant during the fiscal year, but the amount actually charged to the tenant was different than the amount calculated. Cause: The Organization utilized a third-party provider during the year, and new recertifications were completed by the provider. However, for the one home identified, the rent for a tenant did not agree to the minimum tenant contribution to rent. Effect: One tenant was charged less rent than they should have been. Questioned Costs: None Recommendations: The Organization should charge tenants rent based on the minimum tenant contribution to rent, which is calculated annually as a part of the recertification process. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: See corrective action plan included in report.
Criteria: 2 CFR Part 92.209(h) establishes the maximum subsidy that a participating Organization may pay to, or on behalf of a family. The Organization must also establish a “minimum tenant contribution to rent.” Condition: The Organization established the maximum subsidy and the minimum tenant contribution to rent for a tenant during the fiscal year, but the amount actually charged to the tenant was different than the amount calculated. Cause: The Organization utilized a third-party provider during the year, and new recertifications were completed by the provider. However, for the one home identified, the rent for a tenant did not agree to the minimum tenant contribution to rent. Effect: One tenant was charged less rent than they should have been. Questioned Costs: None Recommendations: The Organization should charge tenants rent based on the minimum tenant contribution to rent, which is calculated annually as a part of the recertification process. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: See corrective action plan included in report.