Criteria:
During the period of affordability (i.e., the period for which the non-Federal entity must maintain subsidized housing) for HOME-assisted rental housing, the participating jurisdiction must perform on-site inspections to determine compliance with property standards and verify the information submitted by the owners no less than:
(a) every 3 years for projects containing 1 to 4 units,
(b) every 2 years for projects containing 5 to 25 units, and
(c) every year for projects containing 26 or more units.
The participating jurisdiction must perform on-site inspections of rental housing occupied by tenants receiving HOME-assisted tenant-based rental assistance to determine compliance with housing quality standards (24 CFR 92.209(i), 92.251(f), and 92.504(d)).
Condition:
Of the 12 properties tested, 5 were out of compliance as an inspection should have been completed by October 2023, and 1 was out of compliance as an inspection should have been completed by September 2023.
Cause:
The Organization is responsible for contacting the City of Salem (the City) and Oregon Housing and Community Services (OHCS) to schedule the inspections timely, but there were delays caused by the COVID-19 Pandemic.
Effect:
Units could be out of compliance with housing quality standards.
Questioned Costs:
None
Recommendations:
We recommend the Organization set up a schedule and tracking system in order to contact the City and OHCS in advance of the due date of inspections in order to allow the City and OHCS sufficient time to complete the inspections timely.
Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions:
See corrective action plan included in report.
Criteria:
During the period of affordability (i.e., the period for which the non-Federal entity must maintain subsidized housing) for HOME-assisted rental housing, the participating jurisdiction must perform on-site inspections to determine compliance with property standards and verify the information submitted by the owners no less than:
(a) every 3 years for projects containing 1 to 4 units,
(b) every 2 years for projects containing 5 to 25 units, and
(c) every year for projects containing 26 or more units.
The participating jurisdiction must perform on-site inspections of rental housing occupied by tenants receiving HOME-assisted tenant-based rental assistance to determine compliance with housing quality standards (24 CFR 92.209(i), 92.251(f), and 92.504(d)).
Condition:
Of the 12 properties tested, 5 were out of compliance as an inspection should have been completed by October 2023, and 1 was out of compliance as an inspection should have been completed by September 2023.
Cause:
The Organization is responsible for contacting the City of Salem (the City) and Oregon Housing and Community Services (OHCS) to schedule the inspections timely, but there were delays caused by the COVID-19 Pandemic.
Effect:
Units could be out of compliance with housing quality standards.
Questioned Costs:
None
Recommendations:
We recommend the Organization set up a schedule and tracking system in order to contact the City and OHCS in advance of the due date of inspections in order to allow the City and OHCS sufficient time to complete the inspections timely.
Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions:
See corrective action plan included in report.
Criteria:
During the period of affordability (i.e., the period for which the non-Federal entity must maintain subsidized housing) for HOME-assisted rental housing, the participating jurisdiction must perform on-site inspections to determine compliance with property standards and verify the information submitted by the owners no less than:
(a) every 3 years for projects containing 1 to 4 units,
(b) every 2 years for projects containing 5 to 25 units, and
(c) every year for projects containing 26 or more units.
The participating jurisdiction must perform on-site inspections of rental housing occupied by tenants receiving HOME-assisted tenant-based rental assistance to determine compliance with housing quality standards (24 CFR 92.209(i), 92.251(f), and 92.504(d)).
Condition:
Of the 12 properties tested, 5 were out of compliance as an inspection should have been completed by October 2023, and 1 was out of compliance as an inspection should have been completed by September 2023.
Cause:
The Organization is responsible for contacting the City of Salem (the City) and Oregon Housing and Community Services (OHCS) to schedule the inspections timely, but there were delays caused by the COVID-19 Pandemic.
Effect:
Units could be out of compliance with housing quality standards.
Questioned Costs:
None
Recommendations:
We recommend the Organization set up a schedule and tracking system in order to contact the City and OHCS in advance of the due date of inspections in order to allow the City and OHCS sufficient time to complete the inspections timely.
Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions:
See corrective action plan included in report.
Criteria:
During the period of affordability (i.e., the period for which the non-Federal entity must maintain subsidized housing) for HOME-assisted rental housing, the participating jurisdiction must perform on-site inspections to determine compliance with property standards and verify the information submitted by the owners no less than:
(a) every 3 years for projects containing 1 to 4 units,
(b) every 2 years for projects containing 5 to 25 units, and
(c) every year for projects containing 26 or more units.
The participating jurisdiction must perform on-site inspections of rental housing occupied by tenants receiving HOME-assisted tenant-based rental assistance to determine compliance with housing quality standards (24 CFR 92.209(i), 92.251(f), and 92.504(d)).
Condition:
Of the 12 properties tested, 5 were out of compliance as an inspection should have been completed by October 2023, and 1 was out of compliance as an inspection should have been completed by September 2023.
Cause:
The Organization is responsible for contacting the City of Salem (the City) and Oregon Housing and Community Services (OHCS) to schedule the inspections timely, but there were delays caused by the COVID-19 Pandemic.
Effect:
Units could be out of compliance with housing quality standards.
Questioned Costs:
None
Recommendations:
We recommend the Organization set up a schedule and tracking system in order to contact the City and OHCS in advance of the due date of inspections in order to allow the City and OHCS sufficient time to complete the inspections timely.
Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions:
See corrective action plan included in report.
Criteria:
During the period of affordability (i.e., the period for which the non-Federal entity must maintain subsidized housing) for HOME-assisted rental housing, the participating jurisdiction must perform on-site inspections to determine compliance with property standards and verify the information submitted by the owners no less than:
(a) every 3 years for projects containing 1 to 4 units,
(b) every 2 years for projects containing 5 to 25 units, and
(c) every year for projects containing 26 or more units.
The participating jurisdiction must perform on-site inspections of rental housing occupied by tenants receiving HOME-assisted tenant-based rental assistance to determine compliance with housing quality standards (24 CFR 92.209(i), 92.251(f), and 92.504(d)).
Condition:
Of the 12 properties tested, 5 were out of compliance as an inspection should have been completed by October 2023, and 1 was out of compliance as an inspection should have been completed by September 2023.
Cause:
The Organization is responsible for contacting the City of Salem (the City) and Oregon Housing and Community Services (OHCS) to schedule the inspections timely, but there were delays caused by the COVID-19 Pandemic.
Effect:
Units could be out of compliance with housing quality standards.
Questioned Costs:
None
Recommendations:
We recommend the Organization set up a schedule and tracking system in order to contact the City and OHCS in advance of the due date of inspections in order to allow the City and OHCS sufficient time to complete the inspections timely.
Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions:
See corrective action plan included in report.
Criteria:
During the period of affordability (i.e., the period for which the non-Federal entity must maintain subsidized housing) for HOME-assisted rental housing, the participating jurisdiction must perform on-site inspections to determine compliance with property standards and verify the information submitted by the owners no less than:
(a) every 3 years for projects containing 1 to 4 units,
(b) every 2 years for projects containing 5 to 25 units, and
(c) every year for projects containing 26 or more units.
The participating jurisdiction must perform on-site inspections of rental housing occupied by tenants receiving HOME-assisted tenant-based rental assistance to determine compliance with housing quality standards (24 CFR 92.209(i), 92.251(f), and 92.504(d)).
Condition:
Of the 12 properties tested, 5 were out of compliance as an inspection should have been completed by October 2023, and 1 was out of compliance as an inspection should have been completed by September 2023.
Cause:
The Organization is responsible for contacting the City of Salem (the City) and Oregon Housing and Community Services (OHCS) to schedule the inspections timely, but there were delays caused by the COVID-19 Pandemic.
Effect:
Units could be out of compliance with housing quality standards.
Questioned Costs:
None
Recommendations:
We recommend the Organization set up a schedule and tracking system in order to contact the City and OHCS in advance of the due date of inspections in order to allow the City and OHCS sufficient time to complete the inspections timely.
Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions:
See corrective action plan included in report.
Criteria:
During the period of affordability (i.e., the period for which the non-Federal entity must maintain subsidized housing) for HOME-assisted rental housing, the participating jurisdiction must perform on-site inspections to determine compliance with property standards and verify the information submitted by the owners no less than:
(a) every 3 years for projects containing 1 to 4 units,
(b) every 2 years for projects containing 5 to 25 units, and
(c) every year for projects containing 26 or more units.
The participating jurisdiction must perform on-site inspections of rental housing occupied by tenants receiving HOME-assisted tenant-based rental assistance to determine compliance with housing quality standards (24 CFR 92.209(i), 92.251(f), and 92.504(d)).
Condition:
Of the 12 properties tested, 5 were out of compliance as an inspection should have been completed by October 2023, and 1 was out of compliance as an inspection should have been completed by September 2023.
Cause:
The Organization is responsible for contacting the City of Salem (the City) and Oregon Housing and Community Services (OHCS) to schedule the inspections timely, but there were delays caused by the COVID-19 Pandemic.
Effect:
Units could be out of compliance with housing quality standards.
Questioned Costs:
None
Recommendations:
We recommend the Organization set up a schedule and tracking system in order to contact the City and OHCS in advance of the due date of inspections in order to allow the City and OHCS sufficient time to complete the inspections timely.
Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions:
See corrective action plan included in report.
Criteria:
During the period of affordability (i.e., the period for which the non-Federal entity must maintain subsidized housing) for HOME-assisted rental housing, the participating jurisdiction must perform on-site inspections to determine compliance with property standards and verify the information submitted by the owners no less than:
(a) every 3 years for projects containing 1 to 4 units,
(b) every 2 years for projects containing 5 to 25 units, and
(c) every year for projects containing 26 or more units.
The participating jurisdiction must perform on-site inspections of rental housing occupied by tenants receiving HOME-assisted tenant-based rental assistance to determine compliance with housing quality standards (24 CFR 92.209(i), 92.251(f), and 92.504(d)).
Condition:
Of the 12 properties tested, 5 were out of compliance as an inspection should have been completed by October 2023, and 1 was out of compliance as an inspection should have been completed by September 2023.
Cause:
The Organization is responsible for contacting the City of Salem (the City) and Oregon Housing and Community Services (OHCS) to schedule the inspections timely, but there were delays caused by the COVID-19 Pandemic.
Effect:
Units could be out of compliance with housing quality standards.
Questioned Costs:
None
Recommendations:
We recommend the Organization set up a schedule and tracking system in order to contact the City and OHCS in advance of the due date of inspections in order to allow the City and OHCS sufficient time to complete the inspections timely.
Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions:
See corrective action plan included in report.
Criteria:
During the period of affordability (i.e., the period for which the non-Federal entity must maintain subsidized housing) for HOME-assisted rental housing, the participating jurisdiction must perform on-site inspections to determine compliance with property standards and verify the information submitted by the owners no less than:
(a) every 3 years for projects containing 1 to 4 units,
(b) every 2 years for projects containing 5 to 25 units, and
(c) every year for projects containing 26 or more units.
The participating jurisdiction must perform on-site inspections of rental housing occupied by tenants receiving HOME-assisted tenant-based rental assistance to determine compliance with housing quality standards (24 CFR 92.209(i), 92.251(f), and 92.504(d)).
Condition:
Of the 12 properties tested, 5 were out of compliance as an inspection should have been completed by October 2023, and 1 was out of compliance as an inspection should have been completed by September 2023.
Cause:
The Organization is responsible for contacting the City of Salem (the City) and Oregon Housing and Community Services (OHCS) to schedule the inspections timely, but there were delays caused by the COVID-19 Pandemic.
Effect:
Units could be out of compliance with housing quality standards.
Questioned Costs:
None
Recommendations:
We recommend the Organization set up a schedule and tracking system in order to contact the City and OHCS in advance of the due date of inspections in order to allow the City and OHCS sufficient time to complete the inspections timely.
Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions:
See corrective action plan included in report.
Criteria:
During the period of affordability (i.e., the period for which the non-Federal entity must maintain subsidized housing) for HOME-assisted rental housing, the participating jurisdiction must perform on-site inspections to determine compliance with property standards and verify the information submitted by the owners no less than:
(a) every 3 years for projects containing 1 to 4 units,
(b) every 2 years for projects containing 5 to 25 units, and
(c) every year for projects containing 26 or more units.
The participating jurisdiction must perform on-site inspections of rental housing occupied by tenants receiving HOME-assisted tenant-based rental assistance to determine compliance with housing quality standards (24 CFR 92.209(i), 92.251(f), and 92.504(d)).
Condition:
Of the 12 properties tested, 5 were out of compliance as an inspection should have been completed by October 2023, and 1 was out of compliance as an inspection should have been completed by September 2023.
Cause:
The Organization is responsible for contacting the City of Salem (the City) and Oregon Housing and Community Services (OHCS) to schedule the inspections timely, but there were delays caused by the COVID-19 Pandemic.
Effect:
Units could be out of compliance with housing quality standards.
Questioned Costs:
None
Recommendations:
We recommend the Organization set up a schedule and tracking system in order to contact the City and OHCS in advance of the due date of inspections in order to allow the City and OHCS sufficient time to complete the inspections timely.
Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions:
See corrective action plan included in report.
Criteria:
During the period of affordability (i.e., the period for which the non-Federal entity must maintain subsidized housing) for HOME-assisted rental housing, the participating jurisdiction must perform on-site inspections to determine compliance with property standards and verify the information submitted by the owners no less than:
(a) every 3 years for projects containing 1 to 4 units,
(b) every 2 years for projects containing 5 to 25 units, and
(c) every year for projects containing 26 or more units.
The participating jurisdiction must perform on-site inspections of rental housing occupied by tenants receiving HOME-assisted tenant-based rental assistance to determine compliance with housing quality standards (24 CFR 92.209(i), 92.251(f), and 92.504(d)).
Condition:
Of the 12 properties tested, 5 were out of compliance as an inspection should have been completed by October 2023, and 1 was out of compliance as an inspection should have been completed by September 2023.
Cause:
The Organization is responsible for contacting the City of Salem (the City) and Oregon Housing and Community Services (OHCS) to schedule the inspections timely, but there were delays caused by the COVID-19 Pandemic.
Effect:
Units could be out of compliance with housing quality standards.
Questioned Costs:
None
Recommendations:
We recommend the Organization set up a schedule and tracking system in order to contact the City and OHCS in advance of the due date of inspections in order to allow the City and OHCS sufficient time to complete the inspections timely.
Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions:
See corrective action plan included in report.
Criteria:
During the period of affordability (i.e., the period for which the non-Federal entity must maintain subsidized housing) for HOME-assisted rental housing, the participating jurisdiction must perform on-site inspections to determine compliance with property standards and verify the information submitted by the owners no less than:
(a) every 3 years for projects containing 1 to 4 units,
(b) every 2 years for projects containing 5 to 25 units, and
(c) every year for projects containing 26 or more units.
The participating jurisdiction must perform on-site inspections of rental housing occupied by tenants receiving HOME-assisted tenant-based rental assistance to determine compliance with housing quality standards (24 CFR 92.209(i), 92.251(f), and 92.504(d)).
Condition:
Of the 12 properties tested, 5 were out of compliance as an inspection should have been completed by October 2023, and 1 was out of compliance as an inspection should have been completed by September 2023.
Cause:
The Organization is responsible for contacting the City of Salem (the City) and Oregon Housing and Community Services (OHCS) to schedule the inspections timely, but there were delays caused by the COVID-19 Pandemic.
Effect:
Units could be out of compliance with housing quality standards.
Questioned Costs:
None
Recommendations:
We recommend the Organization set up a schedule and tracking system in order to contact the City and OHCS in advance of the due date of inspections in order to allow the City and OHCS sufficient time to complete the inspections timely.
Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions:
See corrective action plan included in report.
Criteria:
2 CFR Part 92.209(h) establishes the maximum subsidy that a participating Organization may pay to, or on behalf of a family. The Organization must also establish a “minimum tenant contribution to rent.”
Condition:
The Organization established the maximum subsidy and the minimum tenant contribution to rent for a tenant during the fiscal year, but the amount actually charged to the tenant was different than the amount calculated.
Cause:
The Organization utilized a third-party provider during the year, and new recertifications were completed by the provider. However, for the one home identified, the rent for a tenant did not agree to the minimum tenant contribution to rent.
Effect:
One tenant was charged less rent than they should have been.
Questioned Costs:
None
Recommendations:
The Organization should charge tenants rent based on the minimum tenant contribution to rent, which is calculated annually as a part of the recertification process.
Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions:
See corrective action plan included in report.
Criteria:
2 CFR Part 92.209(h) establishes the maximum subsidy that a participating Organization may pay to, or on behalf of a family. The Organization must also establish a “minimum tenant contribution to rent.”
Condition:
The Organization established the maximum subsidy and the minimum tenant contribution to rent for a tenant during the fiscal year, but the amount actually charged to the tenant was different than the amount calculated.
Cause:
The Organization utilized a third-party provider during the year, and new recertifications were completed by the provider. However, for the one home identified, the rent for a tenant did not agree to the minimum tenant contribution to rent.
Effect:
One tenant was charged less rent than they should have been.
Questioned Costs:
None
Recommendations:
The Organization should charge tenants rent based on the minimum tenant contribution to rent, which is calculated annually as a part of the recertification process.
Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions:
See corrective action plan included in report.
Criteria:
2 CFR Part 92.209(h) establishes the maximum subsidy that a participating Organization may pay to, or on behalf of a family. The Organization must also establish a “minimum tenant contribution to rent.”
Condition:
The Organization established the maximum subsidy and the minimum tenant contribution to rent for a tenant during the fiscal year, but the amount actually charged to the tenant was different than the amount calculated.
Cause:
The Organization utilized a third-party provider during the year, and new recertifications were completed by the provider. However, for the one home identified, the rent for a tenant did not agree to the minimum tenant contribution to rent.
Effect:
One tenant was charged less rent than they should have been.
Questioned Costs:
None
Recommendations:
The Organization should charge tenants rent based on the minimum tenant contribution to rent, which is calculated annually as a part of the recertification process.
Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions:
See corrective action plan included in report.
Criteria:
2 CFR Part 92.209(h) establishes the maximum subsidy that a participating Organization may pay to, or on behalf of a family. The Organization must also establish a “minimum tenant contribution to rent.”
Condition:
The Organization established the maximum subsidy and the minimum tenant contribution to rent for a tenant during the fiscal year, but the amount actually charged to the tenant was different than the amount calculated.
Cause:
The Organization utilized a third-party provider during the year, and new recertifications were completed by the provider. However, for the one home identified, the rent for a tenant did not agree to the minimum tenant contribution to rent.
Effect:
One tenant was charged less rent than they should have been.
Questioned Costs:
None
Recommendations:
The Organization should charge tenants rent based on the minimum tenant contribution to rent, which is calculated annually as a part of the recertification process.
Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions:
See corrective action plan included in report.
Criteria:
2 CFR Part 92.209(h) establishes the maximum subsidy that a participating Organization may pay to, or on behalf of a family. The Organization must also establish a “minimum tenant contribution to rent.”
Condition:
The Organization established the maximum subsidy and the minimum tenant contribution to rent for a tenant during the fiscal year, but the amount actually charged to the tenant was different than the amount calculated.
Cause:
The Organization utilized a third-party provider during the year, and new recertifications were completed by the provider. However, for the one home identified, the rent for a tenant did not agree to the minimum tenant contribution to rent.
Effect:
One tenant was charged less rent than they should have been.
Questioned Costs:
None
Recommendations:
The Organization should charge tenants rent based on the minimum tenant contribution to rent, which is calculated annually as a part of the recertification process.
Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions:
See corrective action plan included in report.
Criteria:
2 CFR Part 92.209(h) establishes the maximum subsidy that a participating Organization may pay to, or on behalf of a family. The Organization must also establish a “minimum tenant contribution to rent.”
Condition:
The Organization established the maximum subsidy and the minimum tenant contribution to rent for a tenant during the fiscal year, but the amount actually charged to the tenant was different than the amount calculated.
Cause:
The Organization utilized a third-party provider during the year, and new recertifications were completed by the provider. However, for the one home identified, the rent for a tenant did not agree to the minimum tenant contribution to rent.
Effect:
One tenant was charged less rent than they should have been.
Questioned Costs:
None
Recommendations:
The Organization should charge tenants rent based on the minimum tenant contribution to rent, which is calculated annually as a part of the recertification process.
Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions:
See corrective action plan included in report.
Criteria:
2 CFR Part 92.209(h) establishes the maximum subsidy that a participating Organization may pay to, or on behalf of a family. The Organization must also establish a “minimum tenant contribution to rent.”
Condition:
The Organization established the maximum subsidy and the minimum tenant contribution to rent for a tenant during the fiscal year, but the amount actually charged to the tenant was different than the amount calculated.
Cause:
The Organization utilized a third-party provider during the year, and new recertifications were completed by the provider. However, for the one home identified, the rent for a tenant did not agree to the minimum tenant contribution to rent.
Effect:
One tenant was charged less rent than they should have been.
Questioned Costs:
None
Recommendations:
The Organization should charge tenants rent based on the minimum tenant contribution to rent, which is calculated annually as a part of the recertification process.
Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions:
See corrective action plan included in report.
Criteria:
2 CFR Part 92.209(h) establishes the maximum subsidy that a participating Organization may pay to, or on behalf of a family. The Organization must also establish a “minimum tenant contribution to rent.”
Condition:
The Organization established the maximum subsidy and the minimum tenant contribution to rent for a tenant during the fiscal year, but the amount actually charged to the tenant was different than the amount calculated.
Cause:
The Organization utilized a third-party provider during the year, and new recertifications were completed by the provider. However, for the one home identified, the rent for a tenant did not agree to the minimum tenant contribution to rent.
Effect:
One tenant was charged less rent than they should have been.
Questioned Costs:
None
Recommendations:
The Organization should charge tenants rent based on the minimum tenant contribution to rent, which is calculated annually as a part of the recertification process.
Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions:
See corrective action plan included in report.
Criteria:
2 CFR Part 92.209(h) establishes the maximum subsidy that a participating Organization may pay to, or on behalf of a family. The Organization must also establish a “minimum tenant contribution to rent.”
Condition:
The Organization established the maximum subsidy and the minimum tenant contribution to rent for a tenant during the fiscal year, but the amount actually charged to the tenant was different than the amount calculated.
Cause:
The Organization utilized a third-party provider during the year, and new recertifications were completed by the provider. However, for the one home identified, the rent for a tenant did not agree to the minimum tenant contribution to rent.
Effect:
One tenant was charged less rent than they should have been.
Questioned Costs:
None
Recommendations:
The Organization should charge tenants rent based on the minimum tenant contribution to rent, which is calculated annually as a part of the recertification process.
Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions:
See corrective action plan included in report.
Criteria:
2 CFR Part 92.209(h) establishes the maximum subsidy that a participating Organization may pay to, or on behalf of a family. The Organization must also establish a “minimum tenant contribution to rent.”
Condition:
The Organization established the maximum subsidy and the minimum tenant contribution to rent for a tenant during the fiscal year, but the amount actually charged to the tenant was different than the amount calculated.
Cause:
The Organization utilized a third-party provider during the year, and new recertifications were completed by the provider. However, for the one home identified, the rent for a tenant did not agree to the minimum tenant contribution to rent.
Effect:
One tenant was charged less rent than they should have been.
Questioned Costs:
None
Recommendations:
The Organization should charge tenants rent based on the minimum tenant contribution to rent, which is calculated annually as a part of the recertification process.
Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions:
See corrective action plan included in report.
Criteria:
2 CFR Part 92.209(h) establishes the maximum subsidy that a participating Organization may pay to, or on behalf of a family. The Organization must also establish a “minimum tenant contribution to rent.”
Condition:
The Organization established the maximum subsidy and the minimum tenant contribution to rent for a tenant during the fiscal year, but the amount actually charged to the tenant was different than the amount calculated.
Cause:
The Organization utilized a third-party provider during the year, and new recertifications were completed by the provider. However, for the one home identified, the rent for a tenant did not agree to the minimum tenant contribution to rent.
Effect:
One tenant was charged less rent than they should have been.
Questioned Costs:
None
Recommendations:
The Organization should charge tenants rent based on the minimum tenant contribution to rent, which is calculated annually as a part of the recertification process.
Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions:
See corrective action plan included in report.
Criteria:
2 CFR Part 92.209(h) establishes the maximum subsidy that a participating Organization may pay to, or on behalf of a family. The Organization must also establish a “minimum tenant contribution to rent.”
Condition:
The Organization established the maximum subsidy and the minimum tenant contribution to rent for a tenant during the fiscal year, but the amount actually charged to the tenant was different than the amount calculated.
Cause:
The Organization utilized a third-party provider during the year, and new recertifications were completed by the provider. However, for the one home identified, the rent for a tenant did not agree to the minimum tenant contribution to rent.
Effect:
One tenant was charged less rent than they should have been.
Questioned Costs:
None
Recommendations:
The Organization should charge tenants rent based on the minimum tenant contribution to rent, which is calculated annually as a part of the recertification process.
Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions:
See corrective action plan included in report.
Criteria:
During the period of affordability (i.e., the period for which the non-Federal entity must maintain subsidized housing) for HOME-assisted rental housing, the participating jurisdiction must perform on-site inspections to determine compliance with property standards and verify the information submitted by the owners no less than:
(a) every 3 years for projects containing 1 to 4 units,
(b) every 2 years for projects containing 5 to 25 units, and
(c) every year for projects containing 26 or more units.
The participating jurisdiction must perform on-site inspections of rental housing occupied by tenants receiving HOME-assisted tenant-based rental assistance to determine compliance with housing quality standards (24 CFR 92.209(i), 92.251(f), and 92.504(d)).
Condition:
Of the 12 properties tested, 5 were out of compliance as an inspection should have been completed by October 2023, and 1 was out of compliance as an inspection should have been completed by September 2023.
Cause:
The Organization is responsible for contacting the City of Salem (the City) and Oregon Housing and Community Services (OHCS) to schedule the inspections timely, but there were delays caused by the COVID-19 Pandemic.
Effect:
Units could be out of compliance with housing quality standards.
Questioned Costs:
None
Recommendations:
We recommend the Organization set up a schedule and tracking system in order to contact the City and OHCS in advance of the due date of inspections in order to allow the City and OHCS sufficient time to complete the inspections timely.
Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions:
See corrective action plan included in report.
Criteria:
During the period of affordability (i.e., the period for which the non-Federal entity must maintain subsidized housing) for HOME-assisted rental housing, the participating jurisdiction must perform on-site inspections to determine compliance with property standards and verify the information submitted by the owners no less than:
(a) every 3 years for projects containing 1 to 4 units,
(b) every 2 years for projects containing 5 to 25 units, and
(c) every year for projects containing 26 or more units.
The participating jurisdiction must perform on-site inspections of rental housing occupied by tenants receiving HOME-assisted tenant-based rental assistance to determine compliance with housing quality standards (24 CFR 92.209(i), 92.251(f), and 92.504(d)).
Condition:
Of the 12 properties tested, 5 were out of compliance as an inspection should have been completed by October 2023, and 1 was out of compliance as an inspection should have been completed by September 2023.
Cause:
The Organization is responsible for contacting the City of Salem (the City) and Oregon Housing and Community Services (OHCS) to schedule the inspections timely, but there were delays caused by the COVID-19 Pandemic.
Effect:
Units could be out of compliance with housing quality standards.
Questioned Costs:
None
Recommendations:
We recommend the Organization set up a schedule and tracking system in order to contact the City and OHCS in advance of the due date of inspections in order to allow the City and OHCS sufficient time to complete the inspections timely.
Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions:
See corrective action plan included in report.
Criteria:
During the period of affordability (i.e., the period for which the non-Federal entity must maintain subsidized housing) for HOME-assisted rental housing, the participating jurisdiction must perform on-site inspections to determine compliance with property standards and verify the information submitted by the owners no less than:
(a) every 3 years for projects containing 1 to 4 units,
(b) every 2 years for projects containing 5 to 25 units, and
(c) every year for projects containing 26 or more units.
The participating jurisdiction must perform on-site inspections of rental housing occupied by tenants receiving HOME-assisted tenant-based rental assistance to determine compliance with housing quality standards (24 CFR 92.209(i), 92.251(f), and 92.504(d)).
Condition:
Of the 12 properties tested, 5 were out of compliance as an inspection should have been completed by October 2023, and 1 was out of compliance as an inspection should have been completed by September 2023.
Cause:
The Organization is responsible for contacting the City of Salem (the City) and Oregon Housing and Community Services (OHCS) to schedule the inspections timely, but there were delays caused by the COVID-19 Pandemic.
Effect:
Units could be out of compliance with housing quality standards.
Questioned Costs:
None
Recommendations:
We recommend the Organization set up a schedule and tracking system in order to contact the City and OHCS in advance of the due date of inspections in order to allow the City and OHCS sufficient time to complete the inspections timely.
Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions:
See corrective action plan included in report.
Criteria:
During the period of affordability (i.e., the period for which the non-Federal entity must maintain subsidized housing) for HOME-assisted rental housing, the participating jurisdiction must perform on-site inspections to determine compliance with property standards and verify the information submitted by the owners no less than:
(a) every 3 years for projects containing 1 to 4 units,
(b) every 2 years for projects containing 5 to 25 units, and
(c) every year for projects containing 26 or more units.
The participating jurisdiction must perform on-site inspections of rental housing occupied by tenants receiving HOME-assisted tenant-based rental assistance to determine compliance with housing quality standards (24 CFR 92.209(i), 92.251(f), and 92.504(d)).
Condition:
Of the 12 properties tested, 5 were out of compliance as an inspection should have been completed by October 2023, and 1 was out of compliance as an inspection should have been completed by September 2023.
Cause:
The Organization is responsible for contacting the City of Salem (the City) and Oregon Housing and Community Services (OHCS) to schedule the inspections timely, but there were delays caused by the COVID-19 Pandemic.
Effect:
Units could be out of compliance with housing quality standards.
Questioned Costs:
None
Recommendations:
We recommend the Organization set up a schedule and tracking system in order to contact the City and OHCS in advance of the due date of inspections in order to allow the City and OHCS sufficient time to complete the inspections timely.
Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions:
See corrective action plan included in report.
Criteria:
During the period of affordability (i.e., the period for which the non-Federal entity must maintain subsidized housing) for HOME-assisted rental housing, the participating jurisdiction must perform on-site inspections to determine compliance with property standards and verify the information submitted by the owners no less than:
(a) every 3 years for projects containing 1 to 4 units,
(b) every 2 years for projects containing 5 to 25 units, and
(c) every year for projects containing 26 or more units.
The participating jurisdiction must perform on-site inspections of rental housing occupied by tenants receiving HOME-assisted tenant-based rental assistance to determine compliance with housing quality standards (24 CFR 92.209(i), 92.251(f), and 92.504(d)).
Condition:
Of the 12 properties tested, 5 were out of compliance as an inspection should have been completed by October 2023, and 1 was out of compliance as an inspection should have been completed by September 2023.
Cause:
The Organization is responsible for contacting the City of Salem (the City) and Oregon Housing and Community Services (OHCS) to schedule the inspections timely, but there were delays caused by the COVID-19 Pandemic.
Effect:
Units could be out of compliance with housing quality standards.
Questioned Costs:
None
Recommendations:
We recommend the Organization set up a schedule and tracking system in order to contact the City and OHCS in advance of the due date of inspections in order to allow the City and OHCS sufficient time to complete the inspections timely.
Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions:
See corrective action plan included in report.
Criteria:
During the period of affordability (i.e., the period for which the non-Federal entity must maintain subsidized housing) for HOME-assisted rental housing, the participating jurisdiction must perform on-site inspections to determine compliance with property standards and verify the information submitted by the owners no less than:
(a) every 3 years for projects containing 1 to 4 units,
(b) every 2 years for projects containing 5 to 25 units, and
(c) every year for projects containing 26 or more units.
The participating jurisdiction must perform on-site inspections of rental housing occupied by tenants receiving HOME-assisted tenant-based rental assistance to determine compliance with housing quality standards (24 CFR 92.209(i), 92.251(f), and 92.504(d)).
Condition:
Of the 12 properties tested, 5 were out of compliance as an inspection should have been completed by October 2023, and 1 was out of compliance as an inspection should have been completed by September 2023.
Cause:
The Organization is responsible for contacting the City of Salem (the City) and Oregon Housing and Community Services (OHCS) to schedule the inspections timely, but there were delays caused by the COVID-19 Pandemic.
Effect:
Units could be out of compliance with housing quality standards.
Questioned Costs:
None
Recommendations:
We recommend the Organization set up a schedule and tracking system in order to contact the City and OHCS in advance of the due date of inspections in order to allow the City and OHCS sufficient time to complete the inspections timely.
Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions:
See corrective action plan included in report.
Criteria:
During the period of affordability (i.e., the period for which the non-Federal entity must maintain subsidized housing) for HOME-assisted rental housing, the participating jurisdiction must perform on-site inspections to determine compliance with property standards and verify the information submitted by the owners no less than:
(a) every 3 years for projects containing 1 to 4 units,
(b) every 2 years for projects containing 5 to 25 units, and
(c) every year for projects containing 26 or more units.
The participating jurisdiction must perform on-site inspections of rental housing occupied by tenants receiving HOME-assisted tenant-based rental assistance to determine compliance with housing quality standards (24 CFR 92.209(i), 92.251(f), and 92.504(d)).
Condition:
Of the 12 properties tested, 5 were out of compliance as an inspection should have been completed by October 2023, and 1 was out of compliance as an inspection should have been completed by September 2023.
Cause:
The Organization is responsible for contacting the City of Salem (the City) and Oregon Housing and Community Services (OHCS) to schedule the inspections timely, but there were delays caused by the COVID-19 Pandemic.
Effect:
Units could be out of compliance with housing quality standards.
Questioned Costs:
None
Recommendations:
We recommend the Organization set up a schedule and tracking system in order to contact the City and OHCS in advance of the due date of inspections in order to allow the City and OHCS sufficient time to complete the inspections timely.
Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions:
See corrective action plan included in report.
Criteria:
During the period of affordability (i.e., the period for which the non-Federal entity must maintain subsidized housing) for HOME-assisted rental housing, the participating jurisdiction must perform on-site inspections to determine compliance with property standards and verify the information submitted by the owners no less than:
(a) every 3 years for projects containing 1 to 4 units,
(b) every 2 years for projects containing 5 to 25 units, and
(c) every year for projects containing 26 or more units.
The participating jurisdiction must perform on-site inspections of rental housing occupied by tenants receiving HOME-assisted tenant-based rental assistance to determine compliance with housing quality standards (24 CFR 92.209(i), 92.251(f), and 92.504(d)).
Condition:
Of the 12 properties tested, 5 were out of compliance as an inspection should have been completed by October 2023, and 1 was out of compliance as an inspection should have been completed by September 2023.
Cause:
The Organization is responsible for contacting the City of Salem (the City) and Oregon Housing and Community Services (OHCS) to schedule the inspections timely, but there were delays caused by the COVID-19 Pandemic.
Effect:
Units could be out of compliance with housing quality standards.
Questioned Costs:
None
Recommendations:
We recommend the Organization set up a schedule and tracking system in order to contact the City and OHCS in advance of the due date of inspections in order to allow the City and OHCS sufficient time to complete the inspections timely.
Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions:
See corrective action plan included in report.
Criteria:
During the period of affordability (i.e., the period for which the non-Federal entity must maintain subsidized housing) for HOME-assisted rental housing, the participating jurisdiction must perform on-site inspections to determine compliance with property standards and verify the information submitted by the owners no less than:
(a) every 3 years for projects containing 1 to 4 units,
(b) every 2 years for projects containing 5 to 25 units, and
(c) every year for projects containing 26 or more units.
The participating jurisdiction must perform on-site inspections of rental housing occupied by tenants receiving HOME-assisted tenant-based rental assistance to determine compliance with housing quality standards (24 CFR 92.209(i), 92.251(f), and 92.504(d)).
Condition:
Of the 12 properties tested, 5 were out of compliance as an inspection should have been completed by October 2023, and 1 was out of compliance as an inspection should have been completed by September 2023.
Cause:
The Organization is responsible for contacting the City of Salem (the City) and Oregon Housing and Community Services (OHCS) to schedule the inspections timely, but there were delays caused by the COVID-19 Pandemic.
Effect:
Units could be out of compliance with housing quality standards.
Questioned Costs:
None
Recommendations:
We recommend the Organization set up a schedule and tracking system in order to contact the City and OHCS in advance of the due date of inspections in order to allow the City and OHCS sufficient time to complete the inspections timely.
Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions:
See corrective action plan included in report.
Criteria:
During the period of affordability (i.e., the period for which the non-Federal entity must maintain subsidized housing) for HOME-assisted rental housing, the participating jurisdiction must perform on-site inspections to determine compliance with property standards and verify the information submitted by the owners no less than:
(a) every 3 years for projects containing 1 to 4 units,
(b) every 2 years for projects containing 5 to 25 units, and
(c) every year for projects containing 26 or more units.
The participating jurisdiction must perform on-site inspections of rental housing occupied by tenants receiving HOME-assisted tenant-based rental assistance to determine compliance with housing quality standards (24 CFR 92.209(i), 92.251(f), and 92.504(d)).
Condition:
Of the 12 properties tested, 5 were out of compliance as an inspection should have been completed by October 2023, and 1 was out of compliance as an inspection should have been completed by September 2023.
Cause:
The Organization is responsible for contacting the City of Salem (the City) and Oregon Housing and Community Services (OHCS) to schedule the inspections timely, but there were delays caused by the COVID-19 Pandemic.
Effect:
Units could be out of compliance with housing quality standards.
Questioned Costs:
None
Recommendations:
We recommend the Organization set up a schedule and tracking system in order to contact the City and OHCS in advance of the due date of inspections in order to allow the City and OHCS sufficient time to complete the inspections timely.
Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions:
See corrective action plan included in report.
Criteria:
During the period of affordability (i.e., the period for which the non-Federal entity must maintain subsidized housing) for HOME-assisted rental housing, the participating jurisdiction must perform on-site inspections to determine compliance with property standards and verify the information submitted by the owners no less than:
(a) every 3 years for projects containing 1 to 4 units,
(b) every 2 years for projects containing 5 to 25 units, and
(c) every year for projects containing 26 or more units.
The participating jurisdiction must perform on-site inspections of rental housing occupied by tenants receiving HOME-assisted tenant-based rental assistance to determine compliance with housing quality standards (24 CFR 92.209(i), 92.251(f), and 92.504(d)).
Condition:
Of the 12 properties tested, 5 were out of compliance as an inspection should have been completed by October 2023, and 1 was out of compliance as an inspection should have been completed by September 2023.
Cause:
The Organization is responsible for contacting the City of Salem (the City) and Oregon Housing and Community Services (OHCS) to schedule the inspections timely, but there were delays caused by the COVID-19 Pandemic.
Effect:
Units could be out of compliance with housing quality standards.
Questioned Costs:
None
Recommendations:
We recommend the Organization set up a schedule and tracking system in order to contact the City and OHCS in advance of the due date of inspections in order to allow the City and OHCS sufficient time to complete the inspections timely.
Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions:
See corrective action plan included in report.
Criteria:
During the period of affordability (i.e., the period for which the non-Federal entity must maintain subsidized housing) for HOME-assisted rental housing, the participating jurisdiction must perform on-site inspections to determine compliance with property standards and verify the information submitted by the owners no less than:
(a) every 3 years for projects containing 1 to 4 units,
(b) every 2 years for projects containing 5 to 25 units, and
(c) every year for projects containing 26 or more units.
The participating jurisdiction must perform on-site inspections of rental housing occupied by tenants receiving HOME-assisted tenant-based rental assistance to determine compliance with housing quality standards (24 CFR 92.209(i), 92.251(f), and 92.504(d)).
Condition:
Of the 12 properties tested, 5 were out of compliance as an inspection should have been completed by October 2023, and 1 was out of compliance as an inspection should have been completed by September 2023.
Cause:
The Organization is responsible for contacting the City of Salem (the City) and Oregon Housing and Community Services (OHCS) to schedule the inspections timely, but there were delays caused by the COVID-19 Pandemic.
Effect:
Units could be out of compliance with housing quality standards.
Questioned Costs:
None
Recommendations:
We recommend the Organization set up a schedule and tracking system in order to contact the City and OHCS in advance of the due date of inspections in order to allow the City and OHCS sufficient time to complete the inspections timely.
Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions:
See corrective action plan included in report.
Criteria:
2 CFR Part 92.209(h) establishes the maximum subsidy that a participating Organization may pay to, or on behalf of a family. The Organization must also establish a “minimum tenant contribution to rent.”
Condition:
The Organization established the maximum subsidy and the minimum tenant contribution to rent for a tenant during the fiscal year, but the amount actually charged to the tenant was different than the amount calculated.
Cause:
The Organization utilized a third-party provider during the year, and new recertifications were completed by the provider. However, for the one home identified, the rent for a tenant did not agree to the minimum tenant contribution to rent.
Effect:
One tenant was charged less rent than they should have been.
Questioned Costs:
None
Recommendations:
The Organization should charge tenants rent based on the minimum tenant contribution to rent, which is calculated annually as a part of the recertification process.
Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions:
See corrective action plan included in report.
Criteria:
2 CFR Part 92.209(h) establishes the maximum subsidy that a participating Organization may pay to, or on behalf of a family. The Organization must also establish a “minimum tenant contribution to rent.”
Condition:
The Organization established the maximum subsidy and the minimum tenant contribution to rent for a tenant during the fiscal year, but the amount actually charged to the tenant was different than the amount calculated.
Cause:
The Organization utilized a third-party provider during the year, and new recertifications were completed by the provider. However, for the one home identified, the rent for a tenant did not agree to the minimum tenant contribution to rent.
Effect:
One tenant was charged less rent than they should have been.
Questioned Costs:
None
Recommendations:
The Organization should charge tenants rent based on the minimum tenant contribution to rent, which is calculated annually as a part of the recertification process.
Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions:
See corrective action plan included in report.
Criteria:
2 CFR Part 92.209(h) establishes the maximum subsidy that a participating Organization may pay to, or on behalf of a family. The Organization must also establish a “minimum tenant contribution to rent.”
Condition:
The Organization established the maximum subsidy and the minimum tenant contribution to rent for a tenant during the fiscal year, but the amount actually charged to the tenant was different than the amount calculated.
Cause:
The Organization utilized a third-party provider during the year, and new recertifications were completed by the provider. However, for the one home identified, the rent for a tenant did not agree to the minimum tenant contribution to rent.
Effect:
One tenant was charged less rent than they should have been.
Questioned Costs:
None
Recommendations:
The Organization should charge tenants rent based on the minimum tenant contribution to rent, which is calculated annually as a part of the recertification process.
Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions:
See corrective action plan included in report.
Criteria:
2 CFR Part 92.209(h) establishes the maximum subsidy that a participating Organization may pay to, or on behalf of a family. The Organization must also establish a “minimum tenant contribution to rent.”
Condition:
The Organization established the maximum subsidy and the minimum tenant contribution to rent for a tenant during the fiscal year, but the amount actually charged to the tenant was different than the amount calculated.
Cause:
The Organization utilized a third-party provider during the year, and new recertifications were completed by the provider. However, for the one home identified, the rent for a tenant did not agree to the minimum tenant contribution to rent.
Effect:
One tenant was charged less rent than they should have been.
Questioned Costs:
None
Recommendations:
The Organization should charge tenants rent based on the minimum tenant contribution to rent, which is calculated annually as a part of the recertification process.
Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions:
See corrective action plan included in report.
Criteria:
2 CFR Part 92.209(h) establishes the maximum subsidy that a participating Organization may pay to, or on behalf of a family. The Organization must also establish a “minimum tenant contribution to rent.”
Condition:
The Organization established the maximum subsidy and the minimum tenant contribution to rent for a tenant during the fiscal year, but the amount actually charged to the tenant was different than the amount calculated.
Cause:
The Organization utilized a third-party provider during the year, and new recertifications were completed by the provider. However, for the one home identified, the rent for a tenant did not agree to the minimum tenant contribution to rent.
Effect:
One tenant was charged less rent than they should have been.
Questioned Costs:
None
Recommendations:
The Organization should charge tenants rent based on the minimum tenant contribution to rent, which is calculated annually as a part of the recertification process.
Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions:
See corrective action plan included in report.
Criteria:
2 CFR Part 92.209(h) establishes the maximum subsidy that a participating Organization may pay to, or on behalf of a family. The Organization must also establish a “minimum tenant contribution to rent.”
Condition:
The Organization established the maximum subsidy and the minimum tenant contribution to rent for a tenant during the fiscal year, but the amount actually charged to the tenant was different than the amount calculated.
Cause:
The Organization utilized a third-party provider during the year, and new recertifications were completed by the provider. However, for the one home identified, the rent for a tenant did not agree to the minimum tenant contribution to rent.
Effect:
One tenant was charged less rent than they should have been.
Questioned Costs:
None
Recommendations:
The Organization should charge tenants rent based on the minimum tenant contribution to rent, which is calculated annually as a part of the recertification process.
Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions:
See corrective action plan included in report.
Criteria:
2 CFR Part 92.209(h) establishes the maximum subsidy that a participating Organization may pay to, or on behalf of a family. The Organization must also establish a “minimum tenant contribution to rent.”
Condition:
The Organization established the maximum subsidy and the minimum tenant contribution to rent for a tenant during the fiscal year, but the amount actually charged to the tenant was different than the amount calculated.
Cause:
The Organization utilized a third-party provider during the year, and new recertifications were completed by the provider. However, for the one home identified, the rent for a tenant did not agree to the minimum tenant contribution to rent.
Effect:
One tenant was charged less rent than they should have been.
Questioned Costs:
None
Recommendations:
The Organization should charge tenants rent based on the minimum tenant contribution to rent, which is calculated annually as a part of the recertification process.
Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions:
See corrective action plan included in report.
Criteria:
2 CFR Part 92.209(h) establishes the maximum subsidy that a participating Organization may pay to, or on behalf of a family. The Organization must also establish a “minimum tenant contribution to rent.”
Condition:
The Organization established the maximum subsidy and the minimum tenant contribution to rent for a tenant during the fiscal year, but the amount actually charged to the tenant was different than the amount calculated.
Cause:
The Organization utilized a third-party provider during the year, and new recertifications were completed by the provider. However, for the one home identified, the rent for a tenant did not agree to the minimum tenant contribution to rent.
Effect:
One tenant was charged less rent than they should have been.
Questioned Costs:
None
Recommendations:
The Organization should charge tenants rent based on the minimum tenant contribution to rent, which is calculated annually as a part of the recertification process.
Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions:
See corrective action plan included in report.
Criteria:
2 CFR Part 92.209(h) establishes the maximum subsidy that a participating Organization may pay to, or on behalf of a family. The Organization must also establish a “minimum tenant contribution to rent.”
Condition:
The Organization established the maximum subsidy and the minimum tenant contribution to rent for a tenant during the fiscal year, but the amount actually charged to the tenant was different than the amount calculated.
Cause:
The Organization utilized a third-party provider during the year, and new recertifications were completed by the provider. However, for the one home identified, the rent for a tenant did not agree to the minimum tenant contribution to rent.
Effect:
One tenant was charged less rent than they should have been.
Questioned Costs:
None
Recommendations:
The Organization should charge tenants rent based on the minimum tenant contribution to rent, which is calculated annually as a part of the recertification process.
Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions:
See corrective action plan included in report.
Criteria:
2 CFR Part 92.209(h) establishes the maximum subsidy that a participating Organization may pay to, or on behalf of a family. The Organization must also establish a “minimum tenant contribution to rent.”
Condition:
The Organization established the maximum subsidy and the minimum tenant contribution to rent for a tenant during the fiscal year, but the amount actually charged to the tenant was different than the amount calculated.
Cause:
The Organization utilized a third-party provider during the year, and new recertifications were completed by the provider. However, for the one home identified, the rent for a tenant did not agree to the minimum tenant contribution to rent.
Effect:
One tenant was charged less rent than they should have been.
Questioned Costs:
None
Recommendations:
The Organization should charge tenants rent based on the minimum tenant contribution to rent, which is calculated annually as a part of the recertification process.
Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions:
See corrective action plan included in report.
Criteria:
2 CFR Part 92.209(h) establishes the maximum subsidy that a participating Organization may pay to, or on behalf of a family. The Organization must also establish a “minimum tenant contribution to rent.”
Condition:
The Organization established the maximum subsidy and the minimum tenant contribution to rent for a tenant during the fiscal year, but the amount actually charged to the tenant was different than the amount calculated.
Cause:
The Organization utilized a third-party provider during the year, and new recertifications were completed by the provider. However, for the one home identified, the rent for a tenant did not agree to the minimum tenant contribution to rent.
Effect:
One tenant was charged less rent than they should have been.
Questioned Costs:
None
Recommendations:
The Organization should charge tenants rent based on the minimum tenant contribution to rent, which is calculated annually as a part of the recertification process.
Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions:
See corrective action plan included in report.
Criteria:
2 CFR Part 92.209(h) establishes the maximum subsidy that a participating Organization may pay to, or on behalf of a family. The Organization must also establish a “minimum tenant contribution to rent.”
Condition:
The Organization established the maximum subsidy and the minimum tenant contribution to rent for a tenant during the fiscal year, but the amount actually charged to the tenant was different than the amount calculated.
Cause:
The Organization utilized a third-party provider during the year, and new recertifications were completed by the provider. However, for the one home identified, the rent for a tenant did not agree to the minimum tenant contribution to rent.
Effect:
One tenant was charged less rent than they should have been.
Questioned Costs:
None
Recommendations:
The Organization should charge tenants rent based on the minimum tenant contribution to rent, which is calculated annually as a part of the recertification process.
Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions:
See corrective action plan included in report.