Audit 344970

FY End
2024-06-30
Total Expended
$11.51M
Findings
22
Programs
26
Organization: Madison Consolidated Schools (IN)
Year: 2024 Accepted: 2025-03-06

Organization Exclusion Status:

Checking exclusion status...

Findings

ID Ref Severity Repeat Requirement
525794 2024-003 Material Weakness Yes I
525795 2024-003 Material Weakness Yes I
525796 2024-004 Material Weakness - N
525797 2024-004 Material Weakness - N
525798 2024-005 Material Weakness Yes E
525799 2024-005 Material Weakness Yes E
525800 2024-006 Significant Deficiency - I
525801 2024-006 Significant Deficiency - I
525802 2024-006 Significant Deficiency - I
525803 2024-006 Significant Deficiency - I
525804 2024-006 Significant Deficiency - I
1102236 2024-003 Material Weakness Yes I
1102237 2024-003 Material Weakness Yes I
1102238 2024-004 Material Weakness - N
1102239 2024-004 Material Weakness - N
1102240 2024-005 Material Weakness Yes E
1102241 2024-005 Material Weakness Yes E
1102242 2024-006 Significant Deficiency - I
1102243 2024-006 Significant Deficiency - I
1102244 2024-006 Significant Deficiency - I
1102245 2024-006 Significant Deficiency - I
1102246 2024-006 Significant Deficiency - I

Programs

ALN Program Spent Major Findings
10.555 National School Lunch Program 2023 $1.24M Yes 0
10.555 National School Lunch Program 2024 $1.02M Yes 1
84.010 Title I Grants to Local Educational Agencies 2024 $907,107 Yes 2
84.027 Special Education Grants to States 2023 $820,554 Yes 1
84.010 Title I Grants to Local Educational Agencies 2023 $637,283 Yes 2
10.553 School Breakfast Program 2023 $295,282 Yes 0
10.553 School Breakfast Program 2024 $248,290 Yes 1
84.027 Special Education Grants to States 2024 $184,724 Yes 1
84.425 Education Stabilization Fund 2023 $155,669 Yes 0
84.367 Supporting Effective Instruction State Grants (formerly Improving Teacher Quality State Grants) 2024 $138,853 - 0
84.041 Impact Aid 2024 $91,722 - 0
84.424 Student Support and Academic Enrichment Program 2024 $83,521 - 0
84.041 Impact Aid 2023 $76,543 - 0
84.367 Supporting Effective Instruction State Grants (formerly Improving Teacher Quality State Grants) 2023 $69,623 - 0
84.424 Student Support and Academic Enrichment Program 2023 $43,785 - 0
84.048 Career and Technical Education -- Basic Grants to States 2023 $42,969 - 0
84.048 Career and Technical Education -- Basic Grants to States 2024 $40,688 - 0
84.358 Rural Education 2023 $32,745 - 0
93.778 Medical Assistance Program 2024 $31,911 - 0
93.778 Medical Assistance Program 2023 $29,990 - 0
84.196 Education for Homeless Children and Youth 2023 $27,095 - 0
84.358 Rural Education 2024 $18,755 - 0
84.173 Special Education Preschool Grants 2024 $13,789 Yes 1
84.425 Education Stabilization Fund 2024 $11,182 Yes 0
84.196 Education for Homeless Children and Youth 2024 $10,309 - 0
10.649 Pandemic Ebt Administrative Costs 2023 $3,135 - 0

Contacts

Name Title Type
N7KVE6CS6DN3 Danica Houze Auditee
8122748103 Beth Kelley, Cpa, Cfe Auditor
No contacts on file

Notes to SEFA

Accounting Policies: Note 1. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies A. Basis of Presentation The accompanying Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (SEFA) includes the federal award activity of the School Corporation under programs of the federal government for the years ended June 30, 2023 and 2024. The information in the SEFA is presented in accordance with the requirements of Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance). Because the SEFA presents only a select portion of the operations of the School Corporation, it is not intended to and does not present the financial position of the School Corporation. The Uniform Guidance requires an annual audit of non-federal entities expending a total amount of federal awards equal to or in excess of $750,000 in any fiscal year unless by constitution or statute a less frequent audit is required. In accordance with Indiana Code (IC 5-11-1-25), audits of school corporations shall be conducted biennially. Such audits shall include both years within the biennial period. B. Other Significant Accounting Policies Expenditures reported on the SEFA are reported on the cash basis of accounting. Such expenditures are recognized following the cost principles contained in the Uniform Guidance, wherein certain types of expenditures are not allowable or are limited as to reimbursement. When federal grants are received on a reimbursement basis, the federal awards are considered expended when the reimbursement is received. De Minimis Rate Used: N Rate Explanation: Note 2. Indirect Cost Rate The School Corporation has elected not to use the 10 percent de minimis indirect cost rate allowed under the Uniform Guidance.

Finding Details

FINDING 2024-003 Subject: Child Nutrition Cluster - Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Federal Agency: Department of Agriculture Federal Programs: School Breakfast Program, National School Lunch Program Assistance Listings Numbers: 10.553, 10.555 Federal Award Number and Year (or Other Identifying Number): FY 2023-2024 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Audit Finding: Material Weakness Repeat Finding This is a repeat finding pertaining to internal controls from the immediately prior audit report. The prior audit finding number was 2022-006. Condition and Context An effective internal control system was not in place at the School Corporation to ensure compliance with requirements related to the grant agreement and the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirement. Procurement Federal regulations allow for informal procurement methods when the value of the procurement for property or services does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold, which is customarily set at $250,000. However, Indiana Code 5-22-8 has a more restrictive threshold of $150,000 or less for when small purchase procedures may be used. This informal process allows for methods other than the formal bid process. The informal process is divided between two methods based on thresholds. Micro-purchases, typically for those purchases $10,000 or under, and small purchase procedures for those purchases above the micro-purchase threshold, but below the simplified acquisition threshold. Micro-purchases may be awarded without soliciting competitive price rate quotations. If small purchase procedures are used, then price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources. The School Corporation did not have effective internal controls in place to ensure that an adequate number of price or rate quotations were obtained for all small purchases. Suspension and Debarment Prior to entering into subawards and covered transactions with the Child Nutrition Cluster (CNC) award funds, recipients are required to verify that such contractors and subrecipients are not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded. "Covered transactions" include, but are not limited to, contracts for goods and services awarded under a nonprocurement transaction (i.e., grant agreement) that are expected to equal or exceed $25,000. The verification is to be done by checking the Excluded Parties List System (EPLS), collecting a certification from that person, or adding a clause or condition to the covered transactions with that person. The School Corporation did not have effective internal controls in place to ensure that the verification was completed for all contractors prior to entering into covered transactions. The lack of internal controls was isolated to fiscal year 2023-2024. INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 20 MADISON CONSOLIDATED SCHOOLS SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." Cause Management had not established a system of internal controls to ensure documentation was obtained and retained to demonstrate they had properly procured all small purchases. Management had not established a system of internal controls to ensure that the School Corporation's procedures for verifying a contractor's suspension and debarment status was followed for all contractors. Effect Without the proper design or implementation of internal controls, the internal control system cannot be capable of effectively preventing, or detecting and correcting, material noncompliance. This could result in the School Corporation overpaying for goods or services or paying a contractor who has been suspended or debarred, which would be unallowable. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. Recommendation We recommended that management of the School Corporation strengthen its system of internal controls to ensure that an adequate number of price or rate quotations are obtained for all small purchases and that suspension and debarment is verified for all covered transactions of $25,000 or more. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
FINDING 2024-003 Subject: Child Nutrition Cluster - Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Federal Agency: Department of Agriculture Federal Programs: School Breakfast Program, National School Lunch Program Assistance Listings Numbers: 10.553, 10.555 Federal Award Number and Year (or Other Identifying Number): FY 2023-2024 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Audit Finding: Material Weakness Repeat Finding This is a repeat finding pertaining to internal controls from the immediately prior audit report. The prior audit finding number was 2022-006. Condition and Context An effective internal control system was not in place at the School Corporation to ensure compliance with requirements related to the grant agreement and the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirement. Procurement Federal regulations allow for informal procurement methods when the value of the procurement for property or services does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold, which is customarily set at $250,000. However, Indiana Code 5-22-8 has a more restrictive threshold of $150,000 or less for when small purchase procedures may be used. This informal process allows for methods other than the formal bid process. The informal process is divided between two methods based on thresholds. Micro-purchases, typically for those purchases $10,000 or under, and small purchase procedures for those purchases above the micro-purchase threshold, but below the simplified acquisition threshold. Micro-purchases may be awarded without soliciting competitive price rate quotations. If small purchase procedures are used, then price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources. The School Corporation did not have effective internal controls in place to ensure that an adequate number of price or rate quotations were obtained for all small purchases. Suspension and Debarment Prior to entering into subawards and covered transactions with the Child Nutrition Cluster (CNC) award funds, recipients are required to verify that such contractors and subrecipients are not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded. "Covered transactions" include, but are not limited to, contracts for goods and services awarded under a nonprocurement transaction (i.e., grant agreement) that are expected to equal or exceed $25,000. The verification is to be done by checking the Excluded Parties List System (EPLS), collecting a certification from that person, or adding a clause or condition to the covered transactions with that person. The School Corporation did not have effective internal controls in place to ensure that the verification was completed for all contractors prior to entering into covered transactions. The lack of internal controls was isolated to fiscal year 2023-2024. INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 20 MADISON CONSOLIDATED SCHOOLS SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." Cause Management had not established a system of internal controls to ensure documentation was obtained and retained to demonstrate they had properly procured all small purchases. Management had not established a system of internal controls to ensure that the School Corporation's procedures for verifying a contractor's suspension and debarment status was followed for all contractors. Effect Without the proper design or implementation of internal controls, the internal control system cannot be capable of effectively preventing, or detecting and correcting, material noncompliance. This could result in the School Corporation overpaying for goods or services or paying a contractor who has been suspended or debarred, which would be unallowable. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. Recommendation We recommended that management of the School Corporation strengthen its system of internal controls to ensure that an adequate number of price or rate quotations are obtained for all small purchases and that suspension and debarment is verified for all covered transactions of $25,000 or more. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
FINDING 2024-004 Subject: Title I Grants to Local Educational Agencies - Special Tests and Provisions - Assessment System Security Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Program: Title I Grants to Local Educational Agencies Assistance Listings Number: 84.010 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): S010A210014, S010A220014, S010A230014 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Special Tests and Provisions - Assessment System Security Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Other Matters Condition and Context State educational agencies (SEA), in consultation with local educational agencies (LEA), are required to establish and maintain an assessment security system that is valid, reliable, and consistent with relevant professional and technical standards. Within their assessment system, SEAs must have policies and procedures to maintain test security measures and ensure that LEAs implement those policies and procedures. As such, the Indiana Department of Education created and published the Indiana Assessment Policy Manual. As a part of the assessment security, any individual who administers, handles, or has access to secure test materials at the school or school corporation shall complete assessment training and sign a testing security and integrity statement that remains on file in the appropriate building-level office each year. Each individual required to sign the testing integrity agreement shall sign the form by an established date. The School Corporation had a process to provide assessment system security training and to ensure each employee that attended training signed the agreement indicating training was received. However, there was no process in place to ensure that all documentation of school employees being trained was retained for audit. Due to the lack of internal controls over maintaining the supporting documentation, some of the Indiana Testing and Security agreements were not provided for review. A sample of 40 employees was selected for testing from the School Corporation's roster. Of the 40 employees tested, 8 did not have a signed agreement on file indicating training was received as required. The lack of internal controls and noncompliance was isolated to the 2022-2023 school year for 3 of the buildings. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 22 MADISON CONSOLIDATED SCHOOLS SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) 511 IAC 5-5-5(b) states: "Any individual who administers, handles, or has access to secure test materials at the school or school corporation shall complete assessment training and sign a testing security and integrity agreement to remain on file in the appropriate building-level office each year." Cause A proper system of internal controls was not designed by management of the School Corporation to ensure that all Indiana Testing and Security agreements were on file and could be presented for audit. Agreements for 8 employees selected for testing could not be located. Effect Without the proper implementation of an effectively designed system of internal controls, the internal control system cannot be capable of effectively preventing, or detecting and correcting, material noncompliance. As a result, not all required employees have the required Indiana Testing Security and Integrity agreement maintained for Assessment System Security. Noncompliance with the grant agreement and the compliance requirement could result in the loss of future federal funds to the School Corporation. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. Recommendation We recommended that management of the School Corporation establish a proper system of internal controls and develop policies and procedures to ensure that all required employees complete assessment security training and that the signed appropriate forms are retained for audit. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
FINDING 2024-004 Subject: Title I Grants to Local Educational Agencies - Special Tests and Provisions - Assessment System Security Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Program: Title I Grants to Local Educational Agencies Assistance Listings Number: 84.010 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): S010A210014, S010A220014, S010A230014 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Special Tests and Provisions - Assessment System Security Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Other Matters Condition and Context State educational agencies (SEA), in consultation with local educational agencies (LEA), are required to establish and maintain an assessment security system that is valid, reliable, and consistent with relevant professional and technical standards. Within their assessment system, SEAs must have policies and procedures to maintain test security measures and ensure that LEAs implement those policies and procedures. As such, the Indiana Department of Education created and published the Indiana Assessment Policy Manual. As a part of the assessment security, any individual who administers, handles, or has access to secure test materials at the school or school corporation shall complete assessment training and sign a testing security and integrity statement that remains on file in the appropriate building-level office each year. Each individual required to sign the testing integrity agreement shall sign the form by an established date. The School Corporation had a process to provide assessment system security training and to ensure each employee that attended training signed the agreement indicating training was received. However, there was no process in place to ensure that all documentation of school employees being trained was retained for audit. Due to the lack of internal controls over maintaining the supporting documentation, some of the Indiana Testing and Security agreements were not provided for review. A sample of 40 employees was selected for testing from the School Corporation's roster. Of the 40 employees tested, 8 did not have a signed agreement on file indicating training was received as required. The lack of internal controls and noncompliance was isolated to the 2022-2023 school year for 3 of the buildings. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 22 MADISON CONSOLIDATED SCHOOLS SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) 511 IAC 5-5-5(b) states: "Any individual who administers, handles, or has access to secure test materials at the school or school corporation shall complete assessment training and sign a testing security and integrity agreement to remain on file in the appropriate building-level office each year." Cause A proper system of internal controls was not designed by management of the School Corporation to ensure that all Indiana Testing and Security agreements were on file and could be presented for audit. Agreements for 8 employees selected for testing could not be located. Effect Without the proper implementation of an effectively designed system of internal controls, the internal control system cannot be capable of effectively preventing, or detecting and correcting, material noncompliance. As a result, not all required employees have the required Indiana Testing Security and Integrity agreement maintained for Assessment System Security. Noncompliance with the grant agreement and the compliance requirement could result in the loss of future federal funds to the School Corporation. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. Recommendation We recommended that management of the School Corporation establish a proper system of internal controls and develop policies and procedures to ensure that all required employees complete assessment security training and that the signed appropriate forms are retained for audit. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
FINDING 2024-005 Subject: Title I Grants to Local Educational Agencies - Eligibility Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Program: Title I Grants to Local Educational Agencies Assistance Listings Number: 84.010 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): S010A210014, S010A220014, S010A230014 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Eligibility Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Modified Opinion Repeat Finding This is a repeat finding from the immediately prior audit report. The prior audit finding number was 2022-003. INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 23 MADISON CONSOLIDATED SCHOOLS SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) Condition and Context Eligibility for Title I is determined on the Eligible School Summary of the Tile I application. Enrollment and Poverty numbers are automatically pulled from the Indiana Department of Education's (IDOE) Official Pupil Enrollment (PE) count for each school into the Eligible School Summary page of the Tile I application. These counts that are prepopulated should be based on the School Corporation's records as of October of the prior fiscal year. One person compiled and uploaded enrollment data, including poverty status for Real Time (RT) reports, to the IDOE without a documented oversight or review process to ensure that the information was accurate and retained for audit. In addition, there was no review by the School Corporation of the enrollment and poverty counts that were prepopulated into the School Corporation's Title I grant application. The IDOE used the October 1 RT reports for fiscal years 2021-2022 and 2022-2023, as provided by the School Corporation, to determine Eligibility for the 2022-2023 and 2023-2024 grant programs, respectively. The October 1 RT report could not be presented for audit for 2021-2022, which would have been used to pull in enrollment and poverty information for the 2022-2023 grant. As such, we were unable to verify the amounts reported in the grant application. Additionally, the Indiana State Board of Accounts was unable to verify if the correct socioeconomic status was properly reported for any of the students. Enrollment and poverty numbers for any nonpublic schools are manually entered into the application by the School Corporation. The School Corporation had not established an effective process to review the listing of students from the nonpublic schools for enrollment and poverty counts to be entered into the Title I application and to retain this information for audit. We were unable to determine if the enrolled student count and their poverty status in the application was accurate. The lack of internal controls and lack of information submitted for audit was a systemic issue throughout the audit period. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.334 states in part: "Financial records, supporting documents, statistical records, and all other non-Federal entity records pertinent to a Federal award must be retained for a period of three years from the date of submission of the final expenditure report or, for the Federal awards that are renewed quarterly or annual, from the date of submission of the quarterly or annual financial report, respectively, as reported to the Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity in the case of a subrecipient. . . ." INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 24 MADISON CONSOLIDATED SCHOOLS SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) Cause A proper system of internal controls was not designed by management of the School Corporation, which would include segregation of key functions, to ensure all records pertinent to the federal award were retained for audit. After a change in software providers, information from the previous provider could not be obtained for audit. Effect Without the proper implementation of an effectively designed system of internal controls, the internal control system cannot be capable of effectively preventing, or detecting and correcting, material noncompliance. As a result, RT reports and nonpublic school enrollment documentation were not maintained for audit, and, as such, the Indiana State Board of Accounts could not determine if the School Corporation complied with the Eligibility compliance requirement. Noncompliance with the provisions of federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award could result in the loss of future federal funding to the School Corporation. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. Recommendation We recommended that the management of the School Corporation establish a proper system of internal controls and develop policies and procedures to ensure RT reports, and nonpublic school enrollment documentation are maintained for audit. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
FINDING 2024-005 Subject: Title I Grants to Local Educational Agencies - Eligibility Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Program: Title I Grants to Local Educational Agencies Assistance Listings Number: 84.010 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): S010A210014, S010A220014, S010A230014 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Eligibility Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Modified Opinion Repeat Finding This is a repeat finding from the immediately prior audit report. The prior audit finding number was 2022-003. INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 23 MADISON CONSOLIDATED SCHOOLS SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) Condition and Context Eligibility for Title I is determined on the Eligible School Summary of the Tile I application. Enrollment and Poverty numbers are automatically pulled from the Indiana Department of Education's (IDOE) Official Pupil Enrollment (PE) count for each school into the Eligible School Summary page of the Tile I application. These counts that are prepopulated should be based on the School Corporation's records as of October of the prior fiscal year. One person compiled and uploaded enrollment data, including poverty status for Real Time (RT) reports, to the IDOE without a documented oversight or review process to ensure that the information was accurate and retained for audit. In addition, there was no review by the School Corporation of the enrollment and poverty counts that were prepopulated into the School Corporation's Title I grant application. The IDOE used the October 1 RT reports for fiscal years 2021-2022 and 2022-2023, as provided by the School Corporation, to determine Eligibility for the 2022-2023 and 2023-2024 grant programs, respectively. The October 1 RT report could not be presented for audit for 2021-2022, which would have been used to pull in enrollment and poverty information for the 2022-2023 grant. As such, we were unable to verify the amounts reported in the grant application. Additionally, the Indiana State Board of Accounts was unable to verify if the correct socioeconomic status was properly reported for any of the students. Enrollment and poverty numbers for any nonpublic schools are manually entered into the application by the School Corporation. The School Corporation had not established an effective process to review the listing of students from the nonpublic schools for enrollment and poverty counts to be entered into the Title I application and to retain this information for audit. We were unable to determine if the enrolled student count and their poverty status in the application was accurate. The lack of internal controls and lack of information submitted for audit was a systemic issue throughout the audit period. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.334 states in part: "Financial records, supporting documents, statistical records, and all other non-Federal entity records pertinent to a Federal award must be retained for a period of three years from the date of submission of the final expenditure report or, for the Federal awards that are renewed quarterly or annual, from the date of submission of the quarterly or annual financial report, respectively, as reported to the Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity in the case of a subrecipient. . . ." INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 24 MADISON CONSOLIDATED SCHOOLS SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) Cause A proper system of internal controls was not designed by management of the School Corporation, which would include segregation of key functions, to ensure all records pertinent to the federal award were retained for audit. After a change in software providers, information from the previous provider could not be obtained for audit. Effect Without the proper implementation of an effectively designed system of internal controls, the internal control system cannot be capable of effectively preventing, or detecting and correcting, material noncompliance. As a result, RT reports and nonpublic school enrollment documentation were not maintained for audit, and, as such, the Indiana State Board of Accounts could not determine if the School Corporation complied with the Eligibility compliance requirement. Noncompliance with the provisions of federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award could result in the loss of future federal funding to the School Corporation. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. Recommendation We recommended that the management of the School Corporation establish a proper system of internal controls and develop policies and procedures to ensure RT reports, and nonpublic school enrollment documentation are maintained for audit. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
FINDING 2024-006 Subject: Special Education Cluster (IDEA) - Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Programs: Special Education Grants to States, Special Education Preschool Grants, COVID-19 - Special Education Grants to States, COVID-19 - Special Education Preschool Grants Assistance Listings Numbers: 84.027, 84.173 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): HO27A220084, 21611-127-PN01, 22611-127-ARP, 22611-127-PN01, 23611-127-PN01, 23619-127-ARP, 22619-127-PN01, 23619-127-PN01 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Audit Finding: Significant Deficiency Condition and Context An effective internal control system was not in place at the School Corporation to ensure compliance with requirements related to the grant agreement and suspension and debarment compliance requirements. INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 25 MADISON CONSOLIDATED SCHOOLS SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) Prior to entering into subawards and covered transactions with the Special Education Cluster (SPED) award funds, recipients are required to verify that such contractors and subrecipients are not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded. "Covered transactions" include, but are not limited to, contracts for goods and services awarded under a nonprocurement transaction (i.e., grant agreement) that are expected to equal or exceed $25,000. The verification is to be done by checking the Excluded Parties List System, collecting a certification from that person, or adding a clause or condition to the covered transactions with that person. There was no internal control in place, such as an oversight, review, or approval process, to ensure that contractors or subrecipients were not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded. The lack of internal controls was a systemic issue throughout the audit period. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." Cause The School Corporation did not have internal controls in pace to ensure the suspension and debarment status for covered transactions it intended to pay with federal funds of the major program were properly verified. Effect Without the proper design or implementation of internal controls, the internal control system cannot be capable of effectively preventing, or detecting and correcting, material noncompliance. This could result in the School Corporation paying a contractor who has been suspended or debarred, which would be unallowable. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. Recommendation We recommended that management of the School Corporation strengthen its system of internal controls to ensure that suspension and debarment is verified for all covered transactions of $25,000 or more. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report
FINDING 2024-006 Subject: Special Education Cluster (IDEA) - Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Programs: Special Education Grants to States, Special Education Preschool Grants, COVID-19 - Special Education Grants to States, COVID-19 - Special Education Preschool Grants Assistance Listings Numbers: 84.027, 84.173 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): HO27A220084, 21611-127-PN01, 22611-127-ARP, 22611-127-PN01, 23611-127-PN01, 23619-127-ARP, 22619-127-PN01, 23619-127-PN01 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Audit Finding: Significant Deficiency Condition and Context An effective internal control system was not in place at the School Corporation to ensure compliance with requirements related to the grant agreement and suspension and debarment compliance requirements. INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 25 MADISON CONSOLIDATED SCHOOLS SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) Prior to entering into subawards and covered transactions with the Special Education Cluster (SPED) award funds, recipients are required to verify that such contractors and subrecipients are not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded. "Covered transactions" include, but are not limited to, contracts for goods and services awarded under a nonprocurement transaction (i.e., grant agreement) that are expected to equal or exceed $25,000. The verification is to be done by checking the Excluded Parties List System, collecting a certification from that person, or adding a clause or condition to the covered transactions with that person. There was no internal control in place, such as an oversight, review, or approval process, to ensure that contractors or subrecipients were not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded. The lack of internal controls was a systemic issue throughout the audit period. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." Cause The School Corporation did not have internal controls in pace to ensure the suspension and debarment status for covered transactions it intended to pay with federal funds of the major program were properly verified. Effect Without the proper design or implementation of internal controls, the internal control system cannot be capable of effectively preventing, or detecting and correcting, material noncompliance. This could result in the School Corporation paying a contractor who has been suspended or debarred, which would be unallowable. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. Recommendation We recommended that management of the School Corporation strengthen its system of internal controls to ensure that suspension and debarment is verified for all covered transactions of $25,000 or more. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report
FINDING 2024-006 Subject: Special Education Cluster (IDEA) - Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Programs: Special Education Grants to States, Special Education Preschool Grants, COVID-19 - Special Education Grants to States, COVID-19 - Special Education Preschool Grants Assistance Listings Numbers: 84.027, 84.173 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): HO27A220084, 21611-127-PN01, 22611-127-ARP, 22611-127-PN01, 23611-127-PN01, 23619-127-ARP, 22619-127-PN01, 23619-127-PN01 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Audit Finding: Significant Deficiency Condition and Context An effective internal control system was not in place at the School Corporation to ensure compliance with requirements related to the grant agreement and suspension and debarment compliance requirements. INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 25 MADISON CONSOLIDATED SCHOOLS SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) Prior to entering into subawards and covered transactions with the Special Education Cluster (SPED) award funds, recipients are required to verify that such contractors and subrecipients are not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded. "Covered transactions" include, but are not limited to, contracts for goods and services awarded under a nonprocurement transaction (i.e., grant agreement) that are expected to equal or exceed $25,000. The verification is to be done by checking the Excluded Parties List System, collecting a certification from that person, or adding a clause or condition to the covered transactions with that person. There was no internal control in place, such as an oversight, review, or approval process, to ensure that contractors or subrecipients were not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded. The lack of internal controls was a systemic issue throughout the audit period. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." Cause The School Corporation did not have internal controls in pace to ensure the suspension and debarment status for covered transactions it intended to pay with federal funds of the major program were properly verified. Effect Without the proper design or implementation of internal controls, the internal control system cannot be capable of effectively preventing, or detecting and correcting, material noncompliance. This could result in the School Corporation paying a contractor who has been suspended or debarred, which would be unallowable. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. Recommendation We recommended that management of the School Corporation strengthen its system of internal controls to ensure that suspension and debarment is verified for all covered transactions of $25,000 or more. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report
FINDING 2024-006 Subject: Special Education Cluster (IDEA) - Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Programs: Special Education Grants to States, Special Education Preschool Grants, COVID-19 - Special Education Grants to States, COVID-19 - Special Education Preschool Grants Assistance Listings Numbers: 84.027, 84.173 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): HO27A220084, 21611-127-PN01, 22611-127-ARP, 22611-127-PN01, 23611-127-PN01, 23619-127-ARP, 22619-127-PN01, 23619-127-PN01 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Audit Finding: Significant Deficiency Condition and Context An effective internal control system was not in place at the School Corporation to ensure compliance with requirements related to the grant agreement and suspension and debarment compliance requirements. INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 25 MADISON CONSOLIDATED SCHOOLS SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) Prior to entering into subawards and covered transactions with the Special Education Cluster (SPED) award funds, recipients are required to verify that such contractors and subrecipients are not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded. "Covered transactions" include, but are not limited to, contracts for goods and services awarded under a nonprocurement transaction (i.e., grant agreement) that are expected to equal or exceed $25,000. The verification is to be done by checking the Excluded Parties List System, collecting a certification from that person, or adding a clause or condition to the covered transactions with that person. There was no internal control in place, such as an oversight, review, or approval process, to ensure that contractors or subrecipients were not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded. The lack of internal controls was a systemic issue throughout the audit period. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." Cause The School Corporation did not have internal controls in pace to ensure the suspension and debarment status for covered transactions it intended to pay with federal funds of the major program were properly verified. Effect Without the proper design or implementation of internal controls, the internal control system cannot be capable of effectively preventing, or detecting and correcting, material noncompliance. This could result in the School Corporation paying a contractor who has been suspended or debarred, which would be unallowable. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. Recommendation We recommended that management of the School Corporation strengthen its system of internal controls to ensure that suspension and debarment is verified for all covered transactions of $25,000 or more. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report
FINDING 2024-006 Subject: Special Education Cluster (IDEA) - Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Programs: Special Education Grants to States, Special Education Preschool Grants, COVID-19 - Special Education Grants to States, COVID-19 - Special Education Preschool Grants Assistance Listings Numbers: 84.027, 84.173 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): HO27A220084, 21611-127-PN01, 22611-127-ARP, 22611-127-PN01, 23611-127-PN01, 23619-127-ARP, 22619-127-PN01, 23619-127-PN01 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Audit Finding: Significant Deficiency Condition and Context An effective internal control system was not in place at the School Corporation to ensure compliance with requirements related to the grant agreement and suspension and debarment compliance requirements. INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 25 MADISON CONSOLIDATED SCHOOLS SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) Prior to entering into subawards and covered transactions with the Special Education Cluster (SPED) award funds, recipients are required to verify that such contractors and subrecipients are not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded. "Covered transactions" include, but are not limited to, contracts for goods and services awarded under a nonprocurement transaction (i.e., grant agreement) that are expected to equal or exceed $25,000. The verification is to be done by checking the Excluded Parties List System, collecting a certification from that person, or adding a clause or condition to the covered transactions with that person. There was no internal control in place, such as an oversight, review, or approval process, to ensure that contractors or subrecipients were not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded. The lack of internal controls was a systemic issue throughout the audit period. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." Cause The School Corporation did not have internal controls in pace to ensure the suspension and debarment status for covered transactions it intended to pay with federal funds of the major program were properly verified. Effect Without the proper design or implementation of internal controls, the internal control system cannot be capable of effectively preventing, or detecting and correcting, material noncompliance. This could result in the School Corporation paying a contractor who has been suspended or debarred, which would be unallowable. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. Recommendation We recommended that management of the School Corporation strengthen its system of internal controls to ensure that suspension and debarment is verified for all covered transactions of $25,000 or more. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report
FINDING 2024-003 Subject: Child Nutrition Cluster - Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Federal Agency: Department of Agriculture Federal Programs: School Breakfast Program, National School Lunch Program Assistance Listings Numbers: 10.553, 10.555 Federal Award Number and Year (or Other Identifying Number): FY 2023-2024 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Audit Finding: Material Weakness Repeat Finding This is a repeat finding pertaining to internal controls from the immediately prior audit report. The prior audit finding number was 2022-006. Condition and Context An effective internal control system was not in place at the School Corporation to ensure compliance with requirements related to the grant agreement and the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirement. Procurement Federal regulations allow for informal procurement methods when the value of the procurement for property or services does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold, which is customarily set at $250,000. However, Indiana Code 5-22-8 has a more restrictive threshold of $150,000 or less for when small purchase procedures may be used. This informal process allows for methods other than the formal bid process. The informal process is divided between two methods based on thresholds. Micro-purchases, typically for those purchases $10,000 or under, and small purchase procedures for those purchases above the micro-purchase threshold, but below the simplified acquisition threshold. Micro-purchases may be awarded without soliciting competitive price rate quotations. If small purchase procedures are used, then price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources. The School Corporation did not have effective internal controls in place to ensure that an adequate number of price or rate quotations were obtained for all small purchases. Suspension and Debarment Prior to entering into subawards and covered transactions with the Child Nutrition Cluster (CNC) award funds, recipients are required to verify that such contractors and subrecipients are not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded. "Covered transactions" include, but are not limited to, contracts for goods and services awarded under a nonprocurement transaction (i.e., grant agreement) that are expected to equal or exceed $25,000. The verification is to be done by checking the Excluded Parties List System (EPLS), collecting a certification from that person, or adding a clause or condition to the covered transactions with that person. The School Corporation did not have effective internal controls in place to ensure that the verification was completed for all contractors prior to entering into covered transactions. The lack of internal controls was isolated to fiscal year 2023-2024. INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 20 MADISON CONSOLIDATED SCHOOLS SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." Cause Management had not established a system of internal controls to ensure documentation was obtained and retained to demonstrate they had properly procured all small purchases. Management had not established a system of internal controls to ensure that the School Corporation's procedures for verifying a contractor's suspension and debarment status was followed for all contractors. Effect Without the proper design or implementation of internal controls, the internal control system cannot be capable of effectively preventing, or detecting and correcting, material noncompliance. This could result in the School Corporation overpaying for goods or services or paying a contractor who has been suspended or debarred, which would be unallowable. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. Recommendation We recommended that management of the School Corporation strengthen its system of internal controls to ensure that an adequate number of price or rate quotations are obtained for all small purchases and that suspension and debarment is verified for all covered transactions of $25,000 or more. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
FINDING 2024-003 Subject: Child Nutrition Cluster - Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Federal Agency: Department of Agriculture Federal Programs: School Breakfast Program, National School Lunch Program Assistance Listings Numbers: 10.553, 10.555 Federal Award Number and Year (or Other Identifying Number): FY 2023-2024 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Audit Finding: Material Weakness Repeat Finding This is a repeat finding pertaining to internal controls from the immediately prior audit report. The prior audit finding number was 2022-006. Condition and Context An effective internal control system was not in place at the School Corporation to ensure compliance with requirements related to the grant agreement and the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirement. Procurement Federal regulations allow for informal procurement methods when the value of the procurement for property or services does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold, which is customarily set at $250,000. However, Indiana Code 5-22-8 has a more restrictive threshold of $150,000 or less for when small purchase procedures may be used. This informal process allows for methods other than the formal bid process. The informal process is divided between two methods based on thresholds. Micro-purchases, typically for those purchases $10,000 or under, and small purchase procedures for those purchases above the micro-purchase threshold, but below the simplified acquisition threshold. Micro-purchases may be awarded without soliciting competitive price rate quotations. If small purchase procedures are used, then price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources. The School Corporation did not have effective internal controls in place to ensure that an adequate number of price or rate quotations were obtained for all small purchases. Suspension and Debarment Prior to entering into subawards and covered transactions with the Child Nutrition Cluster (CNC) award funds, recipients are required to verify that such contractors and subrecipients are not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded. "Covered transactions" include, but are not limited to, contracts for goods and services awarded under a nonprocurement transaction (i.e., grant agreement) that are expected to equal or exceed $25,000. The verification is to be done by checking the Excluded Parties List System (EPLS), collecting a certification from that person, or adding a clause or condition to the covered transactions with that person. The School Corporation did not have effective internal controls in place to ensure that the verification was completed for all contractors prior to entering into covered transactions. The lack of internal controls was isolated to fiscal year 2023-2024. INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 20 MADISON CONSOLIDATED SCHOOLS SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." Cause Management had not established a system of internal controls to ensure documentation was obtained and retained to demonstrate they had properly procured all small purchases. Management had not established a system of internal controls to ensure that the School Corporation's procedures for verifying a contractor's suspension and debarment status was followed for all contractors. Effect Without the proper design or implementation of internal controls, the internal control system cannot be capable of effectively preventing, or detecting and correcting, material noncompliance. This could result in the School Corporation overpaying for goods or services or paying a contractor who has been suspended or debarred, which would be unallowable. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. Recommendation We recommended that management of the School Corporation strengthen its system of internal controls to ensure that an adequate number of price or rate quotations are obtained for all small purchases and that suspension and debarment is verified for all covered transactions of $25,000 or more. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
FINDING 2024-004 Subject: Title I Grants to Local Educational Agencies - Special Tests and Provisions - Assessment System Security Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Program: Title I Grants to Local Educational Agencies Assistance Listings Number: 84.010 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): S010A210014, S010A220014, S010A230014 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Special Tests and Provisions - Assessment System Security Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Other Matters Condition and Context State educational agencies (SEA), in consultation with local educational agencies (LEA), are required to establish and maintain an assessment security system that is valid, reliable, and consistent with relevant professional and technical standards. Within their assessment system, SEAs must have policies and procedures to maintain test security measures and ensure that LEAs implement those policies and procedures. As such, the Indiana Department of Education created and published the Indiana Assessment Policy Manual. As a part of the assessment security, any individual who administers, handles, or has access to secure test materials at the school or school corporation shall complete assessment training and sign a testing security and integrity statement that remains on file in the appropriate building-level office each year. Each individual required to sign the testing integrity agreement shall sign the form by an established date. The School Corporation had a process to provide assessment system security training and to ensure each employee that attended training signed the agreement indicating training was received. However, there was no process in place to ensure that all documentation of school employees being trained was retained for audit. Due to the lack of internal controls over maintaining the supporting documentation, some of the Indiana Testing and Security agreements were not provided for review. A sample of 40 employees was selected for testing from the School Corporation's roster. Of the 40 employees tested, 8 did not have a signed agreement on file indicating training was received as required. The lack of internal controls and noncompliance was isolated to the 2022-2023 school year for 3 of the buildings. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 22 MADISON CONSOLIDATED SCHOOLS SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) 511 IAC 5-5-5(b) states: "Any individual who administers, handles, or has access to secure test materials at the school or school corporation shall complete assessment training and sign a testing security and integrity agreement to remain on file in the appropriate building-level office each year." Cause A proper system of internal controls was not designed by management of the School Corporation to ensure that all Indiana Testing and Security agreements were on file and could be presented for audit. Agreements for 8 employees selected for testing could not be located. Effect Without the proper implementation of an effectively designed system of internal controls, the internal control system cannot be capable of effectively preventing, or detecting and correcting, material noncompliance. As a result, not all required employees have the required Indiana Testing Security and Integrity agreement maintained for Assessment System Security. Noncompliance with the grant agreement and the compliance requirement could result in the loss of future federal funds to the School Corporation. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. Recommendation We recommended that management of the School Corporation establish a proper system of internal controls and develop policies and procedures to ensure that all required employees complete assessment security training and that the signed appropriate forms are retained for audit. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
FINDING 2024-004 Subject: Title I Grants to Local Educational Agencies - Special Tests and Provisions - Assessment System Security Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Program: Title I Grants to Local Educational Agencies Assistance Listings Number: 84.010 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): S010A210014, S010A220014, S010A230014 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Special Tests and Provisions - Assessment System Security Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Other Matters Condition and Context State educational agencies (SEA), in consultation with local educational agencies (LEA), are required to establish and maintain an assessment security system that is valid, reliable, and consistent with relevant professional and technical standards. Within their assessment system, SEAs must have policies and procedures to maintain test security measures and ensure that LEAs implement those policies and procedures. As such, the Indiana Department of Education created and published the Indiana Assessment Policy Manual. As a part of the assessment security, any individual who administers, handles, or has access to secure test materials at the school or school corporation shall complete assessment training and sign a testing security and integrity statement that remains on file in the appropriate building-level office each year. Each individual required to sign the testing integrity agreement shall sign the form by an established date. The School Corporation had a process to provide assessment system security training and to ensure each employee that attended training signed the agreement indicating training was received. However, there was no process in place to ensure that all documentation of school employees being trained was retained for audit. Due to the lack of internal controls over maintaining the supporting documentation, some of the Indiana Testing and Security agreements were not provided for review. A sample of 40 employees was selected for testing from the School Corporation's roster. Of the 40 employees tested, 8 did not have a signed agreement on file indicating training was received as required. The lack of internal controls and noncompliance was isolated to the 2022-2023 school year for 3 of the buildings. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 22 MADISON CONSOLIDATED SCHOOLS SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) 511 IAC 5-5-5(b) states: "Any individual who administers, handles, or has access to secure test materials at the school or school corporation shall complete assessment training and sign a testing security and integrity agreement to remain on file in the appropriate building-level office each year." Cause A proper system of internal controls was not designed by management of the School Corporation to ensure that all Indiana Testing and Security agreements were on file and could be presented for audit. Agreements for 8 employees selected for testing could not be located. Effect Without the proper implementation of an effectively designed system of internal controls, the internal control system cannot be capable of effectively preventing, or detecting and correcting, material noncompliance. As a result, not all required employees have the required Indiana Testing Security and Integrity agreement maintained for Assessment System Security. Noncompliance with the grant agreement and the compliance requirement could result in the loss of future federal funds to the School Corporation. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. Recommendation We recommended that management of the School Corporation establish a proper system of internal controls and develop policies and procedures to ensure that all required employees complete assessment security training and that the signed appropriate forms are retained for audit. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
FINDING 2024-005 Subject: Title I Grants to Local Educational Agencies - Eligibility Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Program: Title I Grants to Local Educational Agencies Assistance Listings Number: 84.010 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): S010A210014, S010A220014, S010A230014 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Eligibility Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Modified Opinion Repeat Finding This is a repeat finding from the immediately prior audit report. The prior audit finding number was 2022-003. INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 23 MADISON CONSOLIDATED SCHOOLS SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) Condition and Context Eligibility for Title I is determined on the Eligible School Summary of the Tile I application. Enrollment and Poverty numbers are automatically pulled from the Indiana Department of Education's (IDOE) Official Pupil Enrollment (PE) count for each school into the Eligible School Summary page of the Tile I application. These counts that are prepopulated should be based on the School Corporation's records as of October of the prior fiscal year. One person compiled and uploaded enrollment data, including poverty status for Real Time (RT) reports, to the IDOE without a documented oversight or review process to ensure that the information was accurate and retained for audit. In addition, there was no review by the School Corporation of the enrollment and poverty counts that were prepopulated into the School Corporation's Title I grant application. The IDOE used the October 1 RT reports for fiscal years 2021-2022 and 2022-2023, as provided by the School Corporation, to determine Eligibility for the 2022-2023 and 2023-2024 grant programs, respectively. The October 1 RT report could not be presented for audit for 2021-2022, which would have been used to pull in enrollment and poverty information for the 2022-2023 grant. As such, we were unable to verify the amounts reported in the grant application. Additionally, the Indiana State Board of Accounts was unable to verify if the correct socioeconomic status was properly reported for any of the students. Enrollment and poverty numbers for any nonpublic schools are manually entered into the application by the School Corporation. The School Corporation had not established an effective process to review the listing of students from the nonpublic schools for enrollment and poverty counts to be entered into the Title I application and to retain this information for audit. We were unable to determine if the enrolled student count and their poverty status in the application was accurate. The lack of internal controls and lack of information submitted for audit was a systemic issue throughout the audit period. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.334 states in part: "Financial records, supporting documents, statistical records, and all other non-Federal entity records pertinent to a Federal award must be retained for a period of three years from the date of submission of the final expenditure report or, for the Federal awards that are renewed quarterly or annual, from the date of submission of the quarterly or annual financial report, respectively, as reported to the Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity in the case of a subrecipient. . . ." INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 24 MADISON CONSOLIDATED SCHOOLS SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) Cause A proper system of internal controls was not designed by management of the School Corporation, which would include segregation of key functions, to ensure all records pertinent to the federal award were retained for audit. After a change in software providers, information from the previous provider could not be obtained for audit. Effect Without the proper implementation of an effectively designed system of internal controls, the internal control system cannot be capable of effectively preventing, or detecting and correcting, material noncompliance. As a result, RT reports and nonpublic school enrollment documentation were not maintained for audit, and, as such, the Indiana State Board of Accounts could not determine if the School Corporation complied with the Eligibility compliance requirement. Noncompliance with the provisions of federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award could result in the loss of future federal funding to the School Corporation. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. Recommendation We recommended that the management of the School Corporation establish a proper system of internal controls and develop policies and procedures to ensure RT reports, and nonpublic school enrollment documentation are maintained for audit. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
FINDING 2024-005 Subject: Title I Grants to Local Educational Agencies - Eligibility Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Program: Title I Grants to Local Educational Agencies Assistance Listings Number: 84.010 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): S010A210014, S010A220014, S010A230014 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Eligibility Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Modified Opinion Repeat Finding This is a repeat finding from the immediately prior audit report. The prior audit finding number was 2022-003. INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 23 MADISON CONSOLIDATED SCHOOLS SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) Condition and Context Eligibility for Title I is determined on the Eligible School Summary of the Tile I application. Enrollment and Poverty numbers are automatically pulled from the Indiana Department of Education's (IDOE) Official Pupil Enrollment (PE) count for each school into the Eligible School Summary page of the Tile I application. These counts that are prepopulated should be based on the School Corporation's records as of October of the prior fiscal year. One person compiled and uploaded enrollment data, including poverty status for Real Time (RT) reports, to the IDOE without a documented oversight or review process to ensure that the information was accurate and retained for audit. In addition, there was no review by the School Corporation of the enrollment and poverty counts that were prepopulated into the School Corporation's Title I grant application. The IDOE used the October 1 RT reports for fiscal years 2021-2022 and 2022-2023, as provided by the School Corporation, to determine Eligibility for the 2022-2023 and 2023-2024 grant programs, respectively. The October 1 RT report could not be presented for audit for 2021-2022, which would have been used to pull in enrollment and poverty information for the 2022-2023 grant. As such, we were unable to verify the amounts reported in the grant application. Additionally, the Indiana State Board of Accounts was unable to verify if the correct socioeconomic status was properly reported for any of the students. Enrollment and poverty numbers for any nonpublic schools are manually entered into the application by the School Corporation. The School Corporation had not established an effective process to review the listing of students from the nonpublic schools for enrollment and poverty counts to be entered into the Title I application and to retain this information for audit. We were unable to determine if the enrolled student count and their poverty status in the application was accurate. The lack of internal controls and lack of information submitted for audit was a systemic issue throughout the audit period. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.334 states in part: "Financial records, supporting documents, statistical records, and all other non-Federal entity records pertinent to a Federal award must be retained for a period of three years from the date of submission of the final expenditure report or, for the Federal awards that are renewed quarterly or annual, from the date of submission of the quarterly or annual financial report, respectively, as reported to the Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity in the case of a subrecipient. . . ." INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 24 MADISON CONSOLIDATED SCHOOLS SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) Cause A proper system of internal controls was not designed by management of the School Corporation, which would include segregation of key functions, to ensure all records pertinent to the federal award were retained for audit. After a change in software providers, information from the previous provider could not be obtained for audit. Effect Without the proper implementation of an effectively designed system of internal controls, the internal control system cannot be capable of effectively preventing, or detecting and correcting, material noncompliance. As a result, RT reports and nonpublic school enrollment documentation were not maintained for audit, and, as such, the Indiana State Board of Accounts could not determine if the School Corporation complied with the Eligibility compliance requirement. Noncompliance with the provisions of federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award could result in the loss of future federal funding to the School Corporation. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. Recommendation We recommended that the management of the School Corporation establish a proper system of internal controls and develop policies and procedures to ensure RT reports, and nonpublic school enrollment documentation are maintained for audit. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
FINDING 2024-006 Subject: Special Education Cluster (IDEA) - Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Programs: Special Education Grants to States, Special Education Preschool Grants, COVID-19 - Special Education Grants to States, COVID-19 - Special Education Preschool Grants Assistance Listings Numbers: 84.027, 84.173 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): HO27A220084, 21611-127-PN01, 22611-127-ARP, 22611-127-PN01, 23611-127-PN01, 23619-127-ARP, 22619-127-PN01, 23619-127-PN01 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Audit Finding: Significant Deficiency Condition and Context An effective internal control system was not in place at the School Corporation to ensure compliance with requirements related to the grant agreement and suspension and debarment compliance requirements. INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 25 MADISON CONSOLIDATED SCHOOLS SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) Prior to entering into subawards and covered transactions with the Special Education Cluster (SPED) award funds, recipients are required to verify that such contractors and subrecipients are not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded. "Covered transactions" include, but are not limited to, contracts for goods and services awarded under a nonprocurement transaction (i.e., grant agreement) that are expected to equal or exceed $25,000. The verification is to be done by checking the Excluded Parties List System, collecting a certification from that person, or adding a clause or condition to the covered transactions with that person. There was no internal control in place, such as an oversight, review, or approval process, to ensure that contractors or subrecipients were not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded. The lack of internal controls was a systemic issue throughout the audit period. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." Cause The School Corporation did not have internal controls in pace to ensure the suspension and debarment status for covered transactions it intended to pay with federal funds of the major program were properly verified. Effect Without the proper design or implementation of internal controls, the internal control system cannot be capable of effectively preventing, or detecting and correcting, material noncompliance. This could result in the School Corporation paying a contractor who has been suspended or debarred, which would be unallowable. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. Recommendation We recommended that management of the School Corporation strengthen its system of internal controls to ensure that suspension and debarment is verified for all covered transactions of $25,000 or more. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report
FINDING 2024-006 Subject: Special Education Cluster (IDEA) - Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Programs: Special Education Grants to States, Special Education Preschool Grants, COVID-19 - Special Education Grants to States, COVID-19 - Special Education Preschool Grants Assistance Listings Numbers: 84.027, 84.173 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): HO27A220084, 21611-127-PN01, 22611-127-ARP, 22611-127-PN01, 23611-127-PN01, 23619-127-ARP, 22619-127-PN01, 23619-127-PN01 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Audit Finding: Significant Deficiency Condition and Context An effective internal control system was not in place at the School Corporation to ensure compliance with requirements related to the grant agreement and suspension and debarment compliance requirements. INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 25 MADISON CONSOLIDATED SCHOOLS SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) Prior to entering into subawards and covered transactions with the Special Education Cluster (SPED) award funds, recipients are required to verify that such contractors and subrecipients are not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded. "Covered transactions" include, but are not limited to, contracts for goods and services awarded under a nonprocurement transaction (i.e., grant agreement) that are expected to equal or exceed $25,000. The verification is to be done by checking the Excluded Parties List System, collecting a certification from that person, or adding a clause or condition to the covered transactions with that person. There was no internal control in place, such as an oversight, review, or approval process, to ensure that contractors or subrecipients were not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded. The lack of internal controls was a systemic issue throughout the audit period. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." Cause The School Corporation did not have internal controls in pace to ensure the suspension and debarment status for covered transactions it intended to pay with federal funds of the major program were properly verified. Effect Without the proper design or implementation of internal controls, the internal control system cannot be capable of effectively preventing, or detecting and correcting, material noncompliance. This could result in the School Corporation paying a contractor who has been suspended or debarred, which would be unallowable. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. Recommendation We recommended that management of the School Corporation strengthen its system of internal controls to ensure that suspension and debarment is verified for all covered transactions of $25,000 or more. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report
FINDING 2024-006 Subject: Special Education Cluster (IDEA) - Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Programs: Special Education Grants to States, Special Education Preschool Grants, COVID-19 - Special Education Grants to States, COVID-19 - Special Education Preschool Grants Assistance Listings Numbers: 84.027, 84.173 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): HO27A220084, 21611-127-PN01, 22611-127-ARP, 22611-127-PN01, 23611-127-PN01, 23619-127-ARP, 22619-127-PN01, 23619-127-PN01 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Audit Finding: Significant Deficiency Condition and Context An effective internal control system was not in place at the School Corporation to ensure compliance with requirements related to the grant agreement and suspension and debarment compliance requirements. INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 25 MADISON CONSOLIDATED SCHOOLS SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) Prior to entering into subawards and covered transactions with the Special Education Cluster (SPED) award funds, recipients are required to verify that such contractors and subrecipients are not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded. "Covered transactions" include, but are not limited to, contracts for goods and services awarded under a nonprocurement transaction (i.e., grant agreement) that are expected to equal or exceed $25,000. The verification is to be done by checking the Excluded Parties List System, collecting a certification from that person, or adding a clause or condition to the covered transactions with that person. There was no internal control in place, such as an oversight, review, or approval process, to ensure that contractors or subrecipients were not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded. The lack of internal controls was a systemic issue throughout the audit period. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." Cause The School Corporation did not have internal controls in pace to ensure the suspension and debarment status for covered transactions it intended to pay with federal funds of the major program were properly verified. Effect Without the proper design or implementation of internal controls, the internal control system cannot be capable of effectively preventing, or detecting and correcting, material noncompliance. This could result in the School Corporation paying a contractor who has been suspended or debarred, which would be unallowable. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. Recommendation We recommended that management of the School Corporation strengthen its system of internal controls to ensure that suspension and debarment is verified for all covered transactions of $25,000 or more. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report
FINDING 2024-006 Subject: Special Education Cluster (IDEA) - Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Programs: Special Education Grants to States, Special Education Preschool Grants, COVID-19 - Special Education Grants to States, COVID-19 - Special Education Preschool Grants Assistance Listings Numbers: 84.027, 84.173 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): HO27A220084, 21611-127-PN01, 22611-127-ARP, 22611-127-PN01, 23611-127-PN01, 23619-127-ARP, 22619-127-PN01, 23619-127-PN01 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Audit Finding: Significant Deficiency Condition and Context An effective internal control system was not in place at the School Corporation to ensure compliance with requirements related to the grant agreement and suspension and debarment compliance requirements. INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 25 MADISON CONSOLIDATED SCHOOLS SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) Prior to entering into subawards and covered transactions with the Special Education Cluster (SPED) award funds, recipients are required to verify that such contractors and subrecipients are not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded. "Covered transactions" include, but are not limited to, contracts for goods and services awarded under a nonprocurement transaction (i.e., grant agreement) that are expected to equal or exceed $25,000. The verification is to be done by checking the Excluded Parties List System, collecting a certification from that person, or adding a clause or condition to the covered transactions with that person. There was no internal control in place, such as an oversight, review, or approval process, to ensure that contractors or subrecipients were not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded. The lack of internal controls was a systemic issue throughout the audit period. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." Cause The School Corporation did not have internal controls in pace to ensure the suspension and debarment status for covered transactions it intended to pay with federal funds of the major program were properly verified. Effect Without the proper design or implementation of internal controls, the internal control system cannot be capable of effectively preventing, or detecting and correcting, material noncompliance. This could result in the School Corporation paying a contractor who has been suspended or debarred, which would be unallowable. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. Recommendation We recommended that management of the School Corporation strengthen its system of internal controls to ensure that suspension and debarment is verified for all covered transactions of $25,000 or more. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report
FINDING 2024-006 Subject: Special Education Cluster (IDEA) - Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Programs: Special Education Grants to States, Special Education Preschool Grants, COVID-19 - Special Education Grants to States, COVID-19 - Special Education Preschool Grants Assistance Listings Numbers: 84.027, 84.173 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): HO27A220084, 21611-127-PN01, 22611-127-ARP, 22611-127-PN01, 23611-127-PN01, 23619-127-ARP, 22619-127-PN01, 23619-127-PN01 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Audit Finding: Significant Deficiency Condition and Context An effective internal control system was not in place at the School Corporation to ensure compliance with requirements related to the grant agreement and suspension and debarment compliance requirements. INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 25 MADISON CONSOLIDATED SCHOOLS SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) Prior to entering into subawards and covered transactions with the Special Education Cluster (SPED) award funds, recipients are required to verify that such contractors and subrecipients are not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded. "Covered transactions" include, but are not limited to, contracts for goods and services awarded under a nonprocurement transaction (i.e., grant agreement) that are expected to equal or exceed $25,000. The verification is to be done by checking the Excluded Parties List System, collecting a certification from that person, or adding a clause or condition to the covered transactions with that person. There was no internal control in place, such as an oversight, review, or approval process, to ensure that contractors or subrecipients were not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded. The lack of internal controls was a systemic issue throughout the audit period. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." Cause The School Corporation did not have internal controls in pace to ensure the suspension and debarment status for covered transactions it intended to pay with federal funds of the major program were properly verified. Effect Without the proper design or implementation of internal controls, the internal control system cannot be capable of effectively preventing, or detecting and correcting, material noncompliance. This could result in the School Corporation paying a contractor who has been suspended or debarred, which would be unallowable. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. Recommendation We recommended that management of the School Corporation strengthen its system of internal controls to ensure that suspension and debarment is verified for all covered transactions of $25,000 or more. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report