FINDING 2024-003
Subject: Child Nutrition Cluster - Procurement and Suspension and Debarment
Federal Agency: Department of Agriculture
Federal Programs: School Breakfast Program, National School Lunch Program
Assistance Listings Numbers: 10.553, 10.555
Federal Award Number and Year (or Other Identifying Number): FY 2023-2024
Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education
Compliance Requirement: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment
Audit Finding: Material Weakness
Repeat Finding
This is a repeat finding pertaining to internal controls from the immediately prior audit report. The
prior audit finding number was 2022-006.
Condition and Context
An effective internal control system was not in place at the School Corporation to ensure compliance
with requirements related to the grant agreement and the Procurement and Suspension and
Debarment compliance requirement.
Procurement
Federal regulations allow for informal procurement methods when the value of the procurement
for property or services does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold, which is
customarily set at $250,000. However, Indiana Code 5-22-8 has a more restrictive threshold
of $150,000 or less for when small purchase procedures may be used. This informal process
allows for methods other than the formal bid process. The informal process is divided between
two methods based on thresholds. Micro-purchases, typically for those purchases $10,000 or
under, and small purchase procedures for those purchases above the micro-purchase
threshold, but below the simplified acquisition threshold. Micro-purchases may be awarded
without soliciting competitive price rate quotations. If small purchase procedures are used,
then price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources.
The School Corporation did not have effective internal controls in place to ensure that an
adequate number of price or rate quotations were obtained for all small purchases.
Suspension and Debarment
Prior to entering into subawards and covered transactions with the Child Nutrition Cluster
(CNC) award funds, recipients are required to verify that such contractors and subrecipients
are not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded. "Covered transactions" include, but are
not limited to, contracts for goods and services awarded under a nonprocurement transaction
(i.e., grant agreement) that are expected to equal or exceed $25,000. The verification is to be
done by checking the Excluded Parties List System (EPLS), collecting a certification from that
person, or adding a clause or condition to the covered transactions with that person. The
School Corporation did not have effective internal controls in place to ensure that the verification
was completed for all contractors prior to entering into covered transactions.
The lack of internal controls was isolated to fiscal year 2023-2024.
INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS
20
MADISON CONSOLIDATED SCHOOLS
SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS
(Continued)
Criteria
2 CFR 200.303 states in part:
"The non-Federal entity must:
(a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides
reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in
compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal
award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for
Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the
United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of
Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ."
Cause
Management had not established a system of internal controls to ensure documentation was
obtained and retained to demonstrate they had properly procured all small purchases.
Management had not established a system of internal controls to ensure that the School
Corporation's procedures for verifying a contractor's suspension and debarment status was followed for all
contractors.
Effect
Without the proper design or implementation of internal controls, the internal control system cannot
be capable of effectively preventing, or detecting and correcting, material noncompliance. This could result
in the School Corporation overpaying for goods or services or paying a contractor who has been suspended
or debarred, which would be unallowable.
Questioned Costs
There were no questioned costs identified.
Recommendation
We recommended that management of the School Corporation strengthen its system of internal
controls to ensure that an adequate number of price or rate quotations are obtained for all small purchases
and that suspension and debarment is verified for all covered transactions of $25,000 or more.
Views of Responsible Officials
For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
FINDING 2024-003
Subject: Child Nutrition Cluster - Procurement and Suspension and Debarment
Federal Agency: Department of Agriculture
Federal Programs: School Breakfast Program, National School Lunch Program
Assistance Listings Numbers: 10.553, 10.555
Federal Award Number and Year (or Other Identifying Number): FY 2023-2024
Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education
Compliance Requirement: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment
Audit Finding: Material Weakness
Repeat Finding
This is a repeat finding pertaining to internal controls from the immediately prior audit report. The
prior audit finding number was 2022-006.
Condition and Context
An effective internal control system was not in place at the School Corporation to ensure compliance
with requirements related to the grant agreement and the Procurement and Suspension and
Debarment compliance requirement.
Procurement
Federal regulations allow for informal procurement methods when the value of the procurement
for property or services does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold, which is
customarily set at $250,000. However, Indiana Code 5-22-8 has a more restrictive threshold
of $150,000 or less for when small purchase procedures may be used. This informal process
allows for methods other than the formal bid process. The informal process is divided between
two methods based on thresholds. Micro-purchases, typically for those purchases $10,000 or
under, and small purchase procedures for those purchases above the micro-purchase
threshold, but below the simplified acquisition threshold. Micro-purchases may be awarded
without soliciting competitive price rate quotations. If small purchase procedures are used,
then price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources.
The School Corporation did not have effective internal controls in place to ensure that an
adequate number of price or rate quotations were obtained for all small purchases.
Suspension and Debarment
Prior to entering into subawards and covered transactions with the Child Nutrition Cluster
(CNC) award funds, recipients are required to verify that such contractors and subrecipients
are not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded. "Covered transactions" include, but are
not limited to, contracts for goods and services awarded under a nonprocurement transaction
(i.e., grant agreement) that are expected to equal or exceed $25,000. The verification is to be
done by checking the Excluded Parties List System (EPLS), collecting a certification from that
person, or adding a clause or condition to the covered transactions with that person. The
School Corporation did not have effective internal controls in place to ensure that the verification
was completed for all contractors prior to entering into covered transactions.
The lack of internal controls was isolated to fiscal year 2023-2024.
INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS
20
MADISON CONSOLIDATED SCHOOLS
SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS
(Continued)
Criteria
2 CFR 200.303 states in part:
"The non-Federal entity must:
(a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides
reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in
compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal
award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for
Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the
United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of
Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ."
Cause
Management had not established a system of internal controls to ensure documentation was
obtained and retained to demonstrate they had properly procured all small purchases.
Management had not established a system of internal controls to ensure that the School
Corporation's procedures for verifying a contractor's suspension and debarment status was followed for all
contractors.
Effect
Without the proper design or implementation of internal controls, the internal control system cannot
be capable of effectively preventing, or detecting and correcting, material noncompliance. This could result
in the School Corporation overpaying for goods or services or paying a contractor who has been suspended
or debarred, which would be unallowable.
Questioned Costs
There were no questioned costs identified.
Recommendation
We recommended that management of the School Corporation strengthen its system of internal
controls to ensure that an adequate number of price or rate quotations are obtained for all small purchases
and that suspension and debarment is verified for all covered transactions of $25,000 or more.
Views of Responsible Officials
For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
FINDING 2024-004
Subject: Title I Grants to Local Educational Agencies - Special
Tests and Provisions - Assessment System Security
Federal Agency: Department of Education
Federal Program: Title I Grants to Local Educational Agencies
Assistance Listings Number: 84.010
Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): S010A210014, S010A220014,
S010A230014
Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education
Compliance Requirement: Special Tests and Provisions - Assessment System Security
Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Other Matters
Condition and Context
State educational agencies (SEA), in consultation with local educational agencies (LEA), are
required to establish and maintain an assessment security system that is valid, reliable, and consistent with
relevant professional and technical standards. Within their assessment system, SEAs must have policies
and procedures to maintain test security measures and ensure that LEAs implement those policies and
procedures. As such, the Indiana Department of Education created and published the Indiana Assessment
Policy Manual.
As a part of the assessment security, any individual who administers, handles, or has access to
secure test materials at the school or school corporation shall complete assessment training and sign a
testing security and integrity statement that remains on file in the appropriate building-level office each year.
Each individual required to sign the testing integrity agreement shall sign the form by an established date.
The School Corporation had a process to provide assessment system security training and to
ensure each employee that attended training signed the agreement indicating training was received.
However, there was no process in place to ensure that all documentation of school employees being trained
was retained for audit.
Due to the lack of internal controls over maintaining the supporting documentation, some of the
Indiana Testing and Security agreements were not provided for review. A sample of 40 employees was
selected for testing from the School Corporation's roster. Of the 40 employees tested, 8 did not have a
signed agreement on file indicating training was received as required.
The lack of internal controls and noncompliance was isolated to the 2022-2023 school year for 3 of
the buildings.
Criteria
2 CFR 200.303 states in part:
"The non-Federal entity must:
(a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides
reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in
compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal
award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for
Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the
United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of
Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ."
INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS
22
MADISON CONSOLIDATED SCHOOLS
SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS
(Continued)
511 IAC 5-5-5(b) states: "Any individual who administers, handles, or has access to secure test
materials at the school or school corporation shall complete assessment training and sign a testing security
and integrity agreement to remain on file in the appropriate building-level office each year."
Cause
A proper system of internal controls was not designed by management of the School Corporation
to ensure that all Indiana Testing and Security agreements were on file and could be presented for audit.
Agreements for 8 employees selected for testing could not be located.
Effect
Without the proper implementation of an effectively designed system of internal controls, the
internal control system cannot be capable of effectively preventing, or detecting and correcting, material
noncompliance. As a result, not all required employees have the required Indiana Testing Security and
Integrity agreement maintained for Assessment System Security.
Noncompliance with the grant agreement and the compliance requirement could result in the loss
of future federal funds to the School Corporation.
Questioned Costs
There were no questioned costs identified.
Recommendation
We recommended that management of the School Corporation establish a proper system of
internal controls and develop policies and procedures to ensure that all required employees complete
assessment security training and that the signed appropriate forms are retained for audit.
Views of Responsible Officials
For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
FINDING 2024-004
Subject: Title I Grants to Local Educational Agencies - Special
Tests and Provisions - Assessment System Security
Federal Agency: Department of Education
Federal Program: Title I Grants to Local Educational Agencies
Assistance Listings Number: 84.010
Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): S010A210014, S010A220014,
S010A230014
Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education
Compliance Requirement: Special Tests and Provisions - Assessment System Security
Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Other Matters
Condition and Context
State educational agencies (SEA), in consultation with local educational agencies (LEA), are
required to establish and maintain an assessment security system that is valid, reliable, and consistent with
relevant professional and technical standards. Within their assessment system, SEAs must have policies
and procedures to maintain test security measures and ensure that LEAs implement those policies and
procedures. As such, the Indiana Department of Education created and published the Indiana Assessment
Policy Manual.
As a part of the assessment security, any individual who administers, handles, or has access to
secure test materials at the school or school corporation shall complete assessment training and sign a
testing security and integrity statement that remains on file in the appropriate building-level office each year.
Each individual required to sign the testing integrity agreement shall sign the form by an established date.
The School Corporation had a process to provide assessment system security training and to
ensure each employee that attended training signed the agreement indicating training was received.
However, there was no process in place to ensure that all documentation of school employees being trained
was retained for audit.
Due to the lack of internal controls over maintaining the supporting documentation, some of the
Indiana Testing and Security agreements were not provided for review. A sample of 40 employees was
selected for testing from the School Corporation's roster. Of the 40 employees tested, 8 did not have a
signed agreement on file indicating training was received as required.
The lack of internal controls and noncompliance was isolated to the 2022-2023 school year for 3 of
the buildings.
Criteria
2 CFR 200.303 states in part:
"The non-Federal entity must:
(a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides
reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in
compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal
award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for
Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the
United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of
Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ."
INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS
22
MADISON CONSOLIDATED SCHOOLS
SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS
(Continued)
511 IAC 5-5-5(b) states: "Any individual who administers, handles, or has access to secure test
materials at the school or school corporation shall complete assessment training and sign a testing security
and integrity agreement to remain on file in the appropriate building-level office each year."
Cause
A proper system of internal controls was not designed by management of the School Corporation
to ensure that all Indiana Testing and Security agreements were on file and could be presented for audit.
Agreements for 8 employees selected for testing could not be located.
Effect
Without the proper implementation of an effectively designed system of internal controls, the
internal control system cannot be capable of effectively preventing, or detecting and correcting, material
noncompliance. As a result, not all required employees have the required Indiana Testing Security and
Integrity agreement maintained for Assessment System Security.
Noncompliance with the grant agreement and the compliance requirement could result in the loss
of future federal funds to the School Corporation.
Questioned Costs
There were no questioned costs identified.
Recommendation
We recommended that management of the School Corporation establish a proper system of
internal controls and develop policies and procedures to ensure that all required employees complete
assessment security training and that the signed appropriate forms are retained for audit.
Views of Responsible Officials
For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
FINDING 2024-005
Subject: Title I Grants to Local Educational Agencies - Eligibility
Federal Agency: Department of Education
Federal Program: Title I Grants to Local Educational Agencies
Assistance Listings Number: 84.010
Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): S010A210014, S010A220014,
S010A230014
Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education
Compliance Requirement: Eligibility
Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Modified Opinion
Repeat Finding
This is a repeat finding from the immediately prior audit report. The prior audit finding number was
2022-003.
INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS
23
MADISON CONSOLIDATED SCHOOLS
SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS
(Continued)
Condition and Context
Eligibility for Title I is determined on the Eligible School Summary of the Tile I application.
Enrollment and Poverty numbers are automatically pulled from the Indiana Department of Education's
(IDOE) Official Pupil Enrollment (PE) count for each school into the Eligible School Summary page of the
Tile I application. These counts that are prepopulated should be based on the School Corporation's records
as of October of the prior fiscal year. One person compiled and uploaded enrollment data, including poverty
status for Real Time (RT) reports, to the IDOE without a documented oversight or review process to ensure
that the information was accurate and retained for audit. In addition, there was no review by the School
Corporation of the enrollment and poverty counts that were prepopulated into the School Corporation's Title
I grant application.
The IDOE used the October 1 RT reports for fiscal years 2021-2022 and 2022-2023, as provided
by the School Corporation, to determine Eligibility for the 2022-2023 and 2023-2024 grant programs,
respectively. The October 1 RT report could not be presented for audit for 2021-2022, which would have
been used to pull in enrollment and poverty information for the 2022-2023 grant. As such, we were unable
to verify the amounts reported in the grant application. Additionally, the Indiana State Board of Accounts
was unable to verify if the correct socioeconomic status was properly reported for any of the students.
Enrollment and poverty numbers for any nonpublic schools are manually entered into the
application by the School Corporation. The School Corporation had not established an effective process
to review the listing of students from the nonpublic schools for enrollment and poverty counts to be entered
into the Title I application and to retain this information for audit. We were unable to determine if the enrolled
student count and their poverty status in the application was accurate.
The lack of internal controls and lack of information submitted for audit was a systemic issue
throughout the audit period.
Criteria
2 CFR 200.303 states in part:
"The non-Federal entity must:
(a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides
reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in
compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal
award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for
Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the
United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of
Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ."
2 CFR 200.334 states in part:
"Financial records, supporting documents, statistical records, and all other non-Federal entity
records pertinent to a Federal award must be retained for a period of three years from the date
of submission of the final expenditure report or, for the Federal awards that are renewed
quarterly or annual, from the date of submission of the quarterly or annual financial report,
respectively, as reported to the Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity in the case of
a subrecipient. . . ."
INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 24
MADISON CONSOLIDATED SCHOOLS
SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS
(Continued)
Cause
A proper system of internal controls was not designed by management of the School Corporation,
which would include segregation of key functions, to ensure all records pertinent to the federal award were
retained for audit. After a change in software providers, information from the previous provider could not
be obtained for audit.
Effect
Without the proper implementation of an effectively designed system of internal controls, the
internal control system cannot be capable of effectively preventing, or detecting and correcting, material
noncompliance. As a result, RT reports and nonpublic school enrollment documentation were not
maintained for audit, and, as such, the Indiana State Board of Accounts could not determine if the School
Corporation complied with the Eligibility compliance requirement.
Noncompliance with the provisions of federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of
the federal award could result in the loss of future federal funding to the School Corporation.
Questioned Costs
There were no questioned costs identified.
Recommendation
We recommended that the management of the School Corporation establish a proper system of
internal controls and develop policies and procedures to ensure RT reports, and nonpublic school
enrollment documentation are maintained for audit.
Views of Responsible Officials
For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
FINDING 2024-005
Subject: Title I Grants to Local Educational Agencies - Eligibility
Federal Agency: Department of Education
Federal Program: Title I Grants to Local Educational Agencies
Assistance Listings Number: 84.010
Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): S010A210014, S010A220014,
S010A230014
Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education
Compliance Requirement: Eligibility
Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Modified Opinion
Repeat Finding
This is a repeat finding from the immediately prior audit report. The prior audit finding number was
2022-003.
INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS
23
MADISON CONSOLIDATED SCHOOLS
SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS
(Continued)
Condition and Context
Eligibility for Title I is determined on the Eligible School Summary of the Tile I application.
Enrollment and Poverty numbers are automatically pulled from the Indiana Department of Education's
(IDOE) Official Pupil Enrollment (PE) count for each school into the Eligible School Summary page of the
Tile I application. These counts that are prepopulated should be based on the School Corporation's records
as of October of the prior fiscal year. One person compiled and uploaded enrollment data, including poverty
status for Real Time (RT) reports, to the IDOE without a documented oversight or review process to ensure
that the information was accurate and retained for audit. In addition, there was no review by the School
Corporation of the enrollment and poverty counts that were prepopulated into the School Corporation's Title
I grant application.
The IDOE used the October 1 RT reports for fiscal years 2021-2022 and 2022-2023, as provided
by the School Corporation, to determine Eligibility for the 2022-2023 and 2023-2024 grant programs,
respectively. The October 1 RT report could not be presented for audit for 2021-2022, which would have
been used to pull in enrollment and poverty information for the 2022-2023 grant. As such, we were unable
to verify the amounts reported in the grant application. Additionally, the Indiana State Board of Accounts
was unable to verify if the correct socioeconomic status was properly reported for any of the students.
Enrollment and poverty numbers for any nonpublic schools are manually entered into the
application by the School Corporation. The School Corporation had not established an effective process
to review the listing of students from the nonpublic schools for enrollment and poverty counts to be entered
into the Title I application and to retain this information for audit. We were unable to determine if the enrolled
student count and their poverty status in the application was accurate.
The lack of internal controls and lack of information submitted for audit was a systemic issue
throughout the audit period.
Criteria
2 CFR 200.303 states in part:
"The non-Federal entity must:
(a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides
reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in
compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal
award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for
Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the
United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of
Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ."
2 CFR 200.334 states in part:
"Financial records, supporting documents, statistical records, and all other non-Federal entity
records pertinent to a Federal award must be retained for a period of three years from the date
of submission of the final expenditure report or, for the Federal awards that are renewed
quarterly or annual, from the date of submission of the quarterly or annual financial report,
respectively, as reported to the Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity in the case of
a subrecipient. . . ."
INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 24
MADISON CONSOLIDATED SCHOOLS
SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS
(Continued)
Cause
A proper system of internal controls was not designed by management of the School Corporation,
which would include segregation of key functions, to ensure all records pertinent to the federal award were
retained for audit. After a change in software providers, information from the previous provider could not
be obtained for audit.
Effect
Without the proper implementation of an effectively designed system of internal controls, the
internal control system cannot be capable of effectively preventing, or detecting and correcting, material
noncompliance. As a result, RT reports and nonpublic school enrollment documentation were not
maintained for audit, and, as such, the Indiana State Board of Accounts could not determine if the School
Corporation complied with the Eligibility compliance requirement.
Noncompliance with the provisions of federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of
the federal award could result in the loss of future federal funding to the School Corporation.
Questioned Costs
There were no questioned costs identified.
Recommendation
We recommended that the management of the School Corporation establish a proper system of
internal controls and develop policies and procedures to ensure RT reports, and nonpublic school
enrollment documentation are maintained for audit.
Views of Responsible Officials
For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
FINDING 2024-006
Subject: Special Education Cluster (IDEA) - Procurement and Suspension and Debarment
Federal Agency: Department of Education
Federal Programs: Special Education Grants to States, Special Education Preschool Grants, COVID-19 -
Special Education Grants to States, COVID-19 - Special Education Preschool Grants
Assistance Listings Numbers: 84.027, 84.173
Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): HO27A220084, 21611-127-PN01,
22611-127-ARP, 22611-127-PN01,
23611-127-PN01, 23619-127-ARP,
22619-127-PN01, 23619-127-PN01
Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education
Compliance Requirement: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment
Audit Finding: Significant Deficiency
Condition and Context
An effective internal control system was not in place at the School Corporation to ensure
compliance with requirements related to the grant agreement and suspension and debarment compliance
requirements.
INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS
25
MADISON CONSOLIDATED SCHOOLS
SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS
(Continued)
Prior to entering into subawards and covered transactions with the Special Education Cluster
(SPED) award funds, recipients are required to verify that such contractors and subrecipients are not
suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded. "Covered transactions" include, but are not limited to,
contracts for goods and services awarded under a nonprocurement transaction (i.e., grant agreement) that
are expected to equal or exceed $25,000. The verification is to be done by checking the Excluded Parties
List System, collecting a certification from that person, or adding a clause or condition to the covered
transactions with that person. There was no internal control in place, such as an oversight, review, or
approval process, to ensure that contractors or subrecipients were not suspended, debarred, or otherwise
excluded.
The lack of internal controls was a systemic issue throughout the audit period.
Criteria
2 CFR 200.303 states in part:
"The non-Federal entity must:
(a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides
reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in
compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal
award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for
Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the
United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of
Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ."
Cause
The School Corporation did not have internal controls in pace to ensure the suspension and
debarment status for covered transactions it intended to pay with federal funds of the major program were
properly verified.
Effect
Without the proper design or implementation of internal controls, the internal control system cannot
be capable of effectively preventing, or detecting and correcting, material noncompliance. This could result
in the School Corporation paying a contractor who has been suspended or debarred, which would be
unallowable.
Questioned Costs
There were no questioned costs identified.
Recommendation
We recommended that management of the School Corporation strengthen its system of internal
controls to ensure that suspension and debarment is verified for all covered transactions of $25,000 or
more.
Views of Responsible Officials
For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report
FINDING 2024-006
Subject: Special Education Cluster (IDEA) - Procurement and Suspension and Debarment
Federal Agency: Department of Education
Federal Programs: Special Education Grants to States, Special Education Preschool Grants, COVID-19 -
Special Education Grants to States, COVID-19 - Special Education Preschool Grants
Assistance Listings Numbers: 84.027, 84.173
Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): HO27A220084, 21611-127-PN01,
22611-127-ARP, 22611-127-PN01,
23611-127-PN01, 23619-127-ARP,
22619-127-PN01, 23619-127-PN01
Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education
Compliance Requirement: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment
Audit Finding: Significant Deficiency
Condition and Context
An effective internal control system was not in place at the School Corporation to ensure
compliance with requirements related to the grant agreement and suspension and debarment compliance
requirements.
INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS
25
MADISON CONSOLIDATED SCHOOLS
SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS
(Continued)
Prior to entering into subawards and covered transactions with the Special Education Cluster
(SPED) award funds, recipients are required to verify that such contractors and subrecipients are not
suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded. "Covered transactions" include, but are not limited to,
contracts for goods and services awarded under a nonprocurement transaction (i.e., grant agreement) that
are expected to equal or exceed $25,000. The verification is to be done by checking the Excluded Parties
List System, collecting a certification from that person, or adding a clause or condition to the covered
transactions with that person. There was no internal control in place, such as an oversight, review, or
approval process, to ensure that contractors or subrecipients were not suspended, debarred, or otherwise
excluded.
The lack of internal controls was a systemic issue throughout the audit period.
Criteria
2 CFR 200.303 states in part:
"The non-Federal entity must:
(a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides
reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in
compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal
award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for
Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the
United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of
Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ."
Cause
The School Corporation did not have internal controls in pace to ensure the suspension and
debarment status for covered transactions it intended to pay with federal funds of the major program were
properly verified.
Effect
Without the proper design or implementation of internal controls, the internal control system cannot
be capable of effectively preventing, or detecting and correcting, material noncompliance. This could result
in the School Corporation paying a contractor who has been suspended or debarred, which would be
unallowable.
Questioned Costs
There were no questioned costs identified.
Recommendation
We recommended that management of the School Corporation strengthen its system of internal
controls to ensure that suspension and debarment is verified for all covered transactions of $25,000 or
more.
Views of Responsible Officials
For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report
FINDING 2024-006
Subject: Special Education Cluster (IDEA) - Procurement and Suspension and Debarment
Federal Agency: Department of Education
Federal Programs: Special Education Grants to States, Special Education Preschool Grants, COVID-19 -
Special Education Grants to States, COVID-19 - Special Education Preschool Grants
Assistance Listings Numbers: 84.027, 84.173
Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): HO27A220084, 21611-127-PN01,
22611-127-ARP, 22611-127-PN01,
23611-127-PN01, 23619-127-ARP,
22619-127-PN01, 23619-127-PN01
Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education
Compliance Requirement: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment
Audit Finding: Significant Deficiency
Condition and Context
An effective internal control system was not in place at the School Corporation to ensure
compliance with requirements related to the grant agreement and suspension and debarment compliance
requirements.
INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS
25
MADISON CONSOLIDATED SCHOOLS
SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS
(Continued)
Prior to entering into subawards and covered transactions with the Special Education Cluster
(SPED) award funds, recipients are required to verify that such contractors and subrecipients are not
suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded. "Covered transactions" include, but are not limited to,
contracts for goods and services awarded under a nonprocurement transaction (i.e., grant agreement) that
are expected to equal or exceed $25,000. The verification is to be done by checking the Excluded Parties
List System, collecting a certification from that person, or adding a clause or condition to the covered
transactions with that person. There was no internal control in place, such as an oversight, review, or
approval process, to ensure that contractors or subrecipients were not suspended, debarred, or otherwise
excluded.
The lack of internal controls was a systemic issue throughout the audit period.
Criteria
2 CFR 200.303 states in part:
"The non-Federal entity must:
(a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides
reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in
compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal
award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for
Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the
United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of
Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ."
Cause
The School Corporation did not have internal controls in pace to ensure the suspension and
debarment status for covered transactions it intended to pay with federal funds of the major program were
properly verified.
Effect
Without the proper design or implementation of internal controls, the internal control system cannot
be capable of effectively preventing, or detecting and correcting, material noncompliance. This could result
in the School Corporation paying a contractor who has been suspended or debarred, which would be
unallowable.
Questioned Costs
There were no questioned costs identified.
Recommendation
We recommended that management of the School Corporation strengthen its system of internal
controls to ensure that suspension and debarment is verified for all covered transactions of $25,000 or
more.
Views of Responsible Officials
For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report
FINDING 2024-006
Subject: Special Education Cluster (IDEA) - Procurement and Suspension and Debarment
Federal Agency: Department of Education
Federal Programs: Special Education Grants to States, Special Education Preschool Grants, COVID-19 -
Special Education Grants to States, COVID-19 - Special Education Preschool Grants
Assistance Listings Numbers: 84.027, 84.173
Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): HO27A220084, 21611-127-PN01,
22611-127-ARP, 22611-127-PN01,
23611-127-PN01, 23619-127-ARP,
22619-127-PN01, 23619-127-PN01
Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education
Compliance Requirement: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment
Audit Finding: Significant Deficiency
Condition and Context
An effective internal control system was not in place at the School Corporation to ensure
compliance with requirements related to the grant agreement and suspension and debarment compliance
requirements.
INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS
25
MADISON CONSOLIDATED SCHOOLS
SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS
(Continued)
Prior to entering into subawards and covered transactions with the Special Education Cluster
(SPED) award funds, recipients are required to verify that such contractors and subrecipients are not
suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded. "Covered transactions" include, but are not limited to,
contracts for goods and services awarded under a nonprocurement transaction (i.e., grant agreement) that
are expected to equal or exceed $25,000. The verification is to be done by checking the Excluded Parties
List System, collecting a certification from that person, or adding a clause or condition to the covered
transactions with that person. There was no internal control in place, such as an oversight, review, or
approval process, to ensure that contractors or subrecipients were not suspended, debarred, or otherwise
excluded.
The lack of internal controls was a systemic issue throughout the audit period.
Criteria
2 CFR 200.303 states in part:
"The non-Federal entity must:
(a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides
reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in
compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal
award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for
Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the
United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of
Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ."
Cause
The School Corporation did not have internal controls in pace to ensure the suspension and
debarment status for covered transactions it intended to pay with federal funds of the major program were
properly verified.
Effect
Without the proper design or implementation of internal controls, the internal control system cannot
be capable of effectively preventing, or detecting and correcting, material noncompliance. This could result
in the School Corporation paying a contractor who has been suspended or debarred, which would be
unallowable.
Questioned Costs
There were no questioned costs identified.
Recommendation
We recommended that management of the School Corporation strengthen its system of internal
controls to ensure that suspension and debarment is verified for all covered transactions of $25,000 or
more.
Views of Responsible Officials
For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report
FINDING 2024-006
Subject: Special Education Cluster (IDEA) - Procurement and Suspension and Debarment
Federal Agency: Department of Education
Federal Programs: Special Education Grants to States, Special Education Preschool Grants, COVID-19 -
Special Education Grants to States, COVID-19 - Special Education Preschool Grants
Assistance Listings Numbers: 84.027, 84.173
Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): HO27A220084, 21611-127-PN01,
22611-127-ARP, 22611-127-PN01,
23611-127-PN01, 23619-127-ARP,
22619-127-PN01, 23619-127-PN01
Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education
Compliance Requirement: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment
Audit Finding: Significant Deficiency
Condition and Context
An effective internal control system was not in place at the School Corporation to ensure
compliance with requirements related to the grant agreement and suspension and debarment compliance
requirements.
INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS
25
MADISON CONSOLIDATED SCHOOLS
SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS
(Continued)
Prior to entering into subawards and covered transactions with the Special Education Cluster
(SPED) award funds, recipients are required to verify that such contractors and subrecipients are not
suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded. "Covered transactions" include, but are not limited to,
contracts for goods and services awarded under a nonprocurement transaction (i.e., grant agreement) that
are expected to equal or exceed $25,000. The verification is to be done by checking the Excluded Parties
List System, collecting a certification from that person, or adding a clause or condition to the covered
transactions with that person. There was no internal control in place, such as an oversight, review, or
approval process, to ensure that contractors or subrecipients were not suspended, debarred, or otherwise
excluded.
The lack of internal controls was a systemic issue throughout the audit period.
Criteria
2 CFR 200.303 states in part:
"The non-Federal entity must:
(a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides
reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in
compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal
award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for
Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the
United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of
Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ."
Cause
The School Corporation did not have internal controls in pace to ensure the suspension and
debarment status for covered transactions it intended to pay with federal funds of the major program were
properly verified.
Effect
Without the proper design or implementation of internal controls, the internal control system cannot
be capable of effectively preventing, or detecting and correcting, material noncompliance. This could result
in the School Corporation paying a contractor who has been suspended or debarred, which would be
unallowable.
Questioned Costs
There were no questioned costs identified.
Recommendation
We recommended that management of the School Corporation strengthen its system of internal
controls to ensure that suspension and debarment is verified for all covered transactions of $25,000 or
more.
Views of Responsible Officials
For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report
FINDING 2024-003
Subject: Child Nutrition Cluster - Procurement and Suspension and Debarment
Federal Agency: Department of Agriculture
Federal Programs: School Breakfast Program, National School Lunch Program
Assistance Listings Numbers: 10.553, 10.555
Federal Award Number and Year (or Other Identifying Number): FY 2023-2024
Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education
Compliance Requirement: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment
Audit Finding: Material Weakness
Repeat Finding
This is a repeat finding pertaining to internal controls from the immediately prior audit report. The
prior audit finding number was 2022-006.
Condition and Context
An effective internal control system was not in place at the School Corporation to ensure compliance
with requirements related to the grant agreement and the Procurement and Suspension and
Debarment compliance requirement.
Procurement
Federal regulations allow for informal procurement methods when the value of the procurement
for property or services does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold, which is
customarily set at $250,000. However, Indiana Code 5-22-8 has a more restrictive threshold
of $150,000 or less for when small purchase procedures may be used. This informal process
allows for methods other than the formal bid process. The informal process is divided between
two methods based on thresholds. Micro-purchases, typically for those purchases $10,000 or
under, and small purchase procedures for those purchases above the micro-purchase
threshold, but below the simplified acquisition threshold. Micro-purchases may be awarded
without soliciting competitive price rate quotations. If small purchase procedures are used,
then price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources.
The School Corporation did not have effective internal controls in place to ensure that an
adequate number of price or rate quotations were obtained for all small purchases.
Suspension and Debarment
Prior to entering into subawards and covered transactions with the Child Nutrition Cluster
(CNC) award funds, recipients are required to verify that such contractors and subrecipients
are not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded. "Covered transactions" include, but are
not limited to, contracts for goods and services awarded under a nonprocurement transaction
(i.e., grant agreement) that are expected to equal or exceed $25,000. The verification is to be
done by checking the Excluded Parties List System (EPLS), collecting a certification from that
person, or adding a clause or condition to the covered transactions with that person. The
School Corporation did not have effective internal controls in place to ensure that the verification
was completed for all contractors prior to entering into covered transactions.
The lack of internal controls was isolated to fiscal year 2023-2024.
INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS
20
MADISON CONSOLIDATED SCHOOLS
SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS
(Continued)
Criteria
2 CFR 200.303 states in part:
"The non-Federal entity must:
(a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides
reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in
compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal
award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for
Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the
United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of
Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ."
Cause
Management had not established a system of internal controls to ensure documentation was
obtained and retained to demonstrate they had properly procured all small purchases.
Management had not established a system of internal controls to ensure that the School
Corporation's procedures for verifying a contractor's suspension and debarment status was followed for all
contractors.
Effect
Without the proper design or implementation of internal controls, the internal control system cannot
be capable of effectively preventing, or detecting and correcting, material noncompliance. This could result
in the School Corporation overpaying for goods or services or paying a contractor who has been suspended
or debarred, which would be unallowable.
Questioned Costs
There were no questioned costs identified.
Recommendation
We recommended that management of the School Corporation strengthen its system of internal
controls to ensure that an adequate number of price or rate quotations are obtained for all small purchases
and that suspension and debarment is verified for all covered transactions of $25,000 or more.
Views of Responsible Officials
For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
FINDING 2024-003
Subject: Child Nutrition Cluster - Procurement and Suspension and Debarment
Federal Agency: Department of Agriculture
Federal Programs: School Breakfast Program, National School Lunch Program
Assistance Listings Numbers: 10.553, 10.555
Federal Award Number and Year (or Other Identifying Number): FY 2023-2024
Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education
Compliance Requirement: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment
Audit Finding: Material Weakness
Repeat Finding
This is a repeat finding pertaining to internal controls from the immediately prior audit report. The
prior audit finding number was 2022-006.
Condition and Context
An effective internal control system was not in place at the School Corporation to ensure compliance
with requirements related to the grant agreement and the Procurement and Suspension and
Debarment compliance requirement.
Procurement
Federal regulations allow for informal procurement methods when the value of the procurement
for property or services does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold, which is
customarily set at $250,000. However, Indiana Code 5-22-8 has a more restrictive threshold
of $150,000 or less for when small purchase procedures may be used. This informal process
allows for methods other than the formal bid process. The informal process is divided between
two methods based on thresholds. Micro-purchases, typically for those purchases $10,000 or
under, and small purchase procedures for those purchases above the micro-purchase
threshold, but below the simplified acquisition threshold. Micro-purchases may be awarded
without soliciting competitive price rate quotations. If small purchase procedures are used,
then price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources.
The School Corporation did not have effective internal controls in place to ensure that an
adequate number of price or rate quotations were obtained for all small purchases.
Suspension and Debarment
Prior to entering into subawards and covered transactions with the Child Nutrition Cluster
(CNC) award funds, recipients are required to verify that such contractors and subrecipients
are not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded. "Covered transactions" include, but are
not limited to, contracts for goods and services awarded under a nonprocurement transaction
(i.e., grant agreement) that are expected to equal or exceed $25,000. The verification is to be
done by checking the Excluded Parties List System (EPLS), collecting a certification from that
person, or adding a clause or condition to the covered transactions with that person. The
School Corporation did not have effective internal controls in place to ensure that the verification
was completed for all contractors prior to entering into covered transactions.
The lack of internal controls was isolated to fiscal year 2023-2024.
INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS
20
MADISON CONSOLIDATED SCHOOLS
SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS
(Continued)
Criteria
2 CFR 200.303 states in part:
"The non-Federal entity must:
(a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides
reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in
compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal
award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for
Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the
United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of
Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ."
Cause
Management had not established a system of internal controls to ensure documentation was
obtained and retained to demonstrate they had properly procured all small purchases.
Management had not established a system of internal controls to ensure that the School
Corporation's procedures for verifying a contractor's suspension and debarment status was followed for all
contractors.
Effect
Without the proper design or implementation of internal controls, the internal control system cannot
be capable of effectively preventing, or detecting and correcting, material noncompliance. This could result
in the School Corporation overpaying for goods or services or paying a contractor who has been suspended
or debarred, which would be unallowable.
Questioned Costs
There were no questioned costs identified.
Recommendation
We recommended that management of the School Corporation strengthen its system of internal
controls to ensure that an adequate number of price or rate quotations are obtained for all small purchases
and that suspension and debarment is verified for all covered transactions of $25,000 or more.
Views of Responsible Officials
For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
FINDING 2024-004
Subject: Title I Grants to Local Educational Agencies - Special
Tests and Provisions - Assessment System Security
Federal Agency: Department of Education
Federal Program: Title I Grants to Local Educational Agencies
Assistance Listings Number: 84.010
Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): S010A210014, S010A220014,
S010A230014
Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education
Compliance Requirement: Special Tests and Provisions - Assessment System Security
Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Other Matters
Condition and Context
State educational agencies (SEA), in consultation with local educational agencies (LEA), are
required to establish and maintain an assessment security system that is valid, reliable, and consistent with
relevant professional and technical standards. Within their assessment system, SEAs must have policies
and procedures to maintain test security measures and ensure that LEAs implement those policies and
procedures. As such, the Indiana Department of Education created and published the Indiana Assessment
Policy Manual.
As a part of the assessment security, any individual who administers, handles, or has access to
secure test materials at the school or school corporation shall complete assessment training and sign a
testing security and integrity statement that remains on file in the appropriate building-level office each year.
Each individual required to sign the testing integrity agreement shall sign the form by an established date.
The School Corporation had a process to provide assessment system security training and to
ensure each employee that attended training signed the agreement indicating training was received.
However, there was no process in place to ensure that all documentation of school employees being trained
was retained for audit.
Due to the lack of internal controls over maintaining the supporting documentation, some of the
Indiana Testing and Security agreements were not provided for review. A sample of 40 employees was
selected for testing from the School Corporation's roster. Of the 40 employees tested, 8 did not have a
signed agreement on file indicating training was received as required.
The lack of internal controls and noncompliance was isolated to the 2022-2023 school year for 3 of
the buildings.
Criteria
2 CFR 200.303 states in part:
"The non-Federal entity must:
(a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides
reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in
compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal
award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for
Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the
United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of
Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ."
INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS
22
MADISON CONSOLIDATED SCHOOLS
SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS
(Continued)
511 IAC 5-5-5(b) states: "Any individual who administers, handles, or has access to secure test
materials at the school or school corporation shall complete assessment training and sign a testing security
and integrity agreement to remain on file in the appropriate building-level office each year."
Cause
A proper system of internal controls was not designed by management of the School Corporation
to ensure that all Indiana Testing and Security agreements were on file and could be presented for audit.
Agreements for 8 employees selected for testing could not be located.
Effect
Without the proper implementation of an effectively designed system of internal controls, the
internal control system cannot be capable of effectively preventing, or detecting and correcting, material
noncompliance. As a result, not all required employees have the required Indiana Testing Security and
Integrity agreement maintained for Assessment System Security.
Noncompliance with the grant agreement and the compliance requirement could result in the loss
of future federal funds to the School Corporation.
Questioned Costs
There were no questioned costs identified.
Recommendation
We recommended that management of the School Corporation establish a proper system of
internal controls and develop policies and procedures to ensure that all required employees complete
assessment security training and that the signed appropriate forms are retained for audit.
Views of Responsible Officials
For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
FINDING 2024-004
Subject: Title I Grants to Local Educational Agencies - Special
Tests and Provisions - Assessment System Security
Federal Agency: Department of Education
Federal Program: Title I Grants to Local Educational Agencies
Assistance Listings Number: 84.010
Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): S010A210014, S010A220014,
S010A230014
Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education
Compliance Requirement: Special Tests and Provisions - Assessment System Security
Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Other Matters
Condition and Context
State educational agencies (SEA), in consultation with local educational agencies (LEA), are
required to establish and maintain an assessment security system that is valid, reliable, and consistent with
relevant professional and technical standards. Within their assessment system, SEAs must have policies
and procedures to maintain test security measures and ensure that LEAs implement those policies and
procedures. As such, the Indiana Department of Education created and published the Indiana Assessment
Policy Manual.
As a part of the assessment security, any individual who administers, handles, or has access to
secure test materials at the school or school corporation shall complete assessment training and sign a
testing security and integrity statement that remains on file in the appropriate building-level office each year.
Each individual required to sign the testing integrity agreement shall sign the form by an established date.
The School Corporation had a process to provide assessment system security training and to
ensure each employee that attended training signed the agreement indicating training was received.
However, there was no process in place to ensure that all documentation of school employees being trained
was retained for audit.
Due to the lack of internal controls over maintaining the supporting documentation, some of the
Indiana Testing and Security agreements were not provided for review. A sample of 40 employees was
selected for testing from the School Corporation's roster. Of the 40 employees tested, 8 did not have a
signed agreement on file indicating training was received as required.
The lack of internal controls and noncompliance was isolated to the 2022-2023 school year for 3 of
the buildings.
Criteria
2 CFR 200.303 states in part:
"The non-Federal entity must:
(a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides
reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in
compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal
award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for
Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the
United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of
Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ."
INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS
22
MADISON CONSOLIDATED SCHOOLS
SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS
(Continued)
511 IAC 5-5-5(b) states: "Any individual who administers, handles, or has access to secure test
materials at the school or school corporation shall complete assessment training and sign a testing security
and integrity agreement to remain on file in the appropriate building-level office each year."
Cause
A proper system of internal controls was not designed by management of the School Corporation
to ensure that all Indiana Testing and Security agreements were on file and could be presented for audit.
Agreements for 8 employees selected for testing could not be located.
Effect
Without the proper implementation of an effectively designed system of internal controls, the
internal control system cannot be capable of effectively preventing, or detecting and correcting, material
noncompliance. As a result, not all required employees have the required Indiana Testing Security and
Integrity agreement maintained for Assessment System Security.
Noncompliance with the grant agreement and the compliance requirement could result in the loss
of future federal funds to the School Corporation.
Questioned Costs
There were no questioned costs identified.
Recommendation
We recommended that management of the School Corporation establish a proper system of
internal controls and develop policies and procedures to ensure that all required employees complete
assessment security training and that the signed appropriate forms are retained for audit.
Views of Responsible Officials
For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
FINDING 2024-005
Subject: Title I Grants to Local Educational Agencies - Eligibility
Federal Agency: Department of Education
Federal Program: Title I Grants to Local Educational Agencies
Assistance Listings Number: 84.010
Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): S010A210014, S010A220014,
S010A230014
Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education
Compliance Requirement: Eligibility
Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Modified Opinion
Repeat Finding
This is a repeat finding from the immediately prior audit report. The prior audit finding number was
2022-003.
INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS
23
MADISON CONSOLIDATED SCHOOLS
SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS
(Continued)
Condition and Context
Eligibility for Title I is determined on the Eligible School Summary of the Tile I application.
Enrollment and Poverty numbers are automatically pulled from the Indiana Department of Education's
(IDOE) Official Pupil Enrollment (PE) count for each school into the Eligible School Summary page of the
Tile I application. These counts that are prepopulated should be based on the School Corporation's records
as of October of the prior fiscal year. One person compiled and uploaded enrollment data, including poverty
status for Real Time (RT) reports, to the IDOE without a documented oversight or review process to ensure
that the information was accurate and retained for audit. In addition, there was no review by the School
Corporation of the enrollment and poverty counts that were prepopulated into the School Corporation's Title
I grant application.
The IDOE used the October 1 RT reports for fiscal years 2021-2022 and 2022-2023, as provided
by the School Corporation, to determine Eligibility for the 2022-2023 and 2023-2024 grant programs,
respectively. The October 1 RT report could not be presented for audit for 2021-2022, which would have
been used to pull in enrollment and poverty information for the 2022-2023 grant. As such, we were unable
to verify the amounts reported in the grant application. Additionally, the Indiana State Board of Accounts
was unable to verify if the correct socioeconomic status was properly reported for any of the students.
Enrollment and poverty numbers for any nonpublic schools are manually entered into the
application by the School Corporation. The School Corporation had not established an effective process
to review the listing of students from the nonpublic schools for enrollment and poverty counts to be entered
into the Title I application and to retain this information for audit. We were unable to determine if the enrolled
student count and their poverty status in the application was accurate.
The lack of internal controls and lack of information submitted for audit was a systemic issue
throughout the audit period.
Criteria
2 CFR 200.303 states in part:
"The non-Federal entity must:
(a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides
reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in
compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal
award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for
Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the
United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of
Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ."
2 CFR 200.334 states in part:
"Financial records, supporting documents, statistical records, and all other non-Federal entity
records pertinent to a Federal award must be retained for a period of three years from the date
of submission of the final expenditure report or, for the Federal awards that are renewed
quarterly or annual, from the date of submission of the quarterly or annual financial report,
respectively, as reported to the Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity in the case of
a subrecipient. . . ."
INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 24
MADISON CONSOLIDATED SCHOOLS
SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS
(Continued)
Cause
A proper system of internal controls was not designed by management of the School Corporation,
which would include segregation of key functions, to ensure all records pertinent to the federal award were
retained for audit. After a change in software providers, information from the previous provider could not
be obtained for audit.
Effect
Without the proper implementation of an effectively designed system of internal controls, the
internal control system cannot be capable of effectively preventing, or detecting and correcting, material
noncompliance. As a result, RT reports and nonpublic school enrollment documentation were not
maintained for audit, and, as such, the Indiana State Board of Accounts could not determine if the School
Corporation complied with the Eligibility compliance requirement.
Noncompliance with the provisions of federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of
the federal award could result in the loss of future federal funding to the School Corporation.
Questioned Costs
There were no questioned costs identified.
Recommendation
We recommended that the management of the School Corporation establish a proper system of
internal controls and develop policies and procedures to ensure RT reports, and nonpublic school
enrollment documentation are maintained for audit.
Views of Responsible Officials
For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
FINDING 2024-005
Subject: Title I Grants to Local Educational Agencies - Eligibility
Federal Agency: Department of Education
Federal Program: Title I Grants to Local Educational Agencies
Assistance Listings Number: 84.010
Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): S010A210014, S010A220014,
S010A230014
Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education
Compliance Requirement: Eligibility
Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Modified Opinion
Repeat Finding
This is a repeat finding from the immediately prior audit report. The prior audit finding number was
2022-003.
INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS
23
MADISON CONSOLIDATED SCHOOLS
SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS
(Continued)
Condition and Context
Eligibility for Title I is determined on the Eligible School Summary of the Tile I application.
Enrollment and Poverty numbers are automatically pulled from the Indiana Department of Education's
(IDOE) Official Pupil Enrollment (PE) count for each school into the Eligible School Summary page of the
Tile I application. These counts that are prepopulated should be based on the School Corporation's records
as of October of the prior fiscal year. One person compiled and uploaded enrollment data, including poverty
status for Real Time (RT) reports, to the IDOE without a documented oversight or review process to ensure
that the information was accurate and retained for audit. In addition, there was no review by the School
Corporation of the enrollment and poverty counts that were prepopulated into the School Corporation's Title
I grant application.
The IDOE used the October 1 RT reports for fiscal years 2021-2022 and 2022-2023, as provided
by the School Corporation, to determine Eligibility for the 2022-2023 and 2023-2024 grant programs,
respectively. The October 1 RT report could not be presented for audit for 2021-2022, which would have
been used to pull in enrollment and poverty information for the 2022-2023 grant. As such, we were unable
to verify the amounts reported in the grant application. Additionally, the Indiana State Board of Accounts
was unable to verify if the correct socioeconomic status was properly reported for any of the students.
Enrollment and poverty numbers for any nonpublic schools are manually entered into the
application by the School Corporation. The School Corporation had not established an effective process
to review the listing of students from the nonpublic schools for enrollment and poverty counts to be entered
into the Title I application and to retain this information for audit. We were unable to determine if the enrolled
student count and their poverty status in the application was accurate.
The lack of internal controls and lack of information submitted for audit was a systemic issue
throughout the audit period.
Criteria
2 CFR 200.303 states in part:
"The non-Federal entity must:
(a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides
reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in
compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal
award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for
Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the
United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of
Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ."
2 CFR 200.334 states in part:
"Financial records, supporting documents, statistical records, and all other non-Federal entity
records pertinent to a Federal award must be retained for a period of three years from the date
of submission of the final expenditure report or, for the Federal awards that are renewed
quarterly or annual, from the date of submission of the quarterly or annual financial report,
respectively, as reported to the Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity in the case of
a subrecipient. . . ."
INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 24
MADISON CONSOLIDATED SCHOOLS
SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS
(Continued)
Cause
A proper system of internal controls was not designed by management of the School Corporation,
which would include segregation of key functions, to ensure all records pertinent to the federal award were
retained for audit. After a change in software providers, information from the previous provider could not
be obtained for audit.
Effect
Without the proper implementation of an effectively designed system of internal controls, the
internal control system cannot be capable of effectively preventing, or detecting and correcting, material
noncompliance. As a result, RT reports and nonpublic school enrollment documentation were not
maintained for audit, and, as such, the Indiana State Board of Accounts could not determine if the School
Corporation complied with the Eligibility compliance requirement.
Noncompliance with the provisions of federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of
the federal award could result in the loss of future federal funding to the School Corporation.
Questioned Costs
There were no questioned costs identified.
Recommendation
We recommended that the management of the School Corporation establish a proper system of
internal controls and develop policies and procedures to ensure RT reports, and nonpublic school
enrollment documentation are maintained for audit.
Views of Responsible Officials
For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
FINDING 2024-006
Subject: Special Education Cluster (IDEA) - Procurement and Suspension and Debarment
Federal Agency: Department of Education
Federal Programs: Special Education Grants to States, Special Education Preschool Grants, COVID-19 -
Special Education Grants to States, COVID-19 - Special Education Preschool Grants
Assistance Listings Numbers: 84.027, 84.173
Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): HO27A220084, 21611-127-PN01,
22611-127-ARP, 22611-127-PN01,
23611-127-PN01, 23619-127-ARP,
22619-127-PN01, 23619-127-PN01
Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education
Compliance Requirement: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment
Audit Finding: Significant Deficiency
Condition and Context
An effective internal control system was not in place at the School Corporation to ensure
compliance with requirements related to the grant agreement and suspension and debarment compliance
requirements.
INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS
25
MADISON CONSOLIDATED SCHOOLS
SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS
(Continued)
Prior to entering into subawards and covered transactions with the Special Education Cluster
(SPED) award funds, recipients are required to verify that such contractors and subrecipients are not
suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded. "Covered transactions" include, but are not limited to,
contracts for goods and services awarded under a nonprocurement transaction (i.e., grant agreement) that
are expected to equal or exceed $25,000. The verification is to be done by checking the Excluded Parties
List System, collecting a certification from that person, or adding a clause or condition to the covered
transactions with that person. There was no internal control in place, such as an oversight, review, or
approval process, to ensure that contractors or subrecipients were not suspended, debarred, or otherwise
excluded.
The lack of internal controls was a systemic issue throughout the audit period.
Criteria
2 CFR 200.303 states in part:
"The non-Federal entity must:
(a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides
reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in
compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal
award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for
Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the
United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of
Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ."
Cause
The School Corporation did not have internal controls in pace to ensure the suspension and
debarment status for covered transactions it intended to pay with federal funds of the major program were
properly verified.
Effect
Without the proper design or implementation of internal controls, the internal control system cannot
be capable of effectively preventing, or detecting and correcting, material noncompliance. This could result
in the School Corporation paying a contractor who has been suspended or debarred, which would be
unallowable.
Questioned Costs
There were no questioned costs identified.
Recommendation
We recommended that management of the School Corporation strengthen its system of internal
controls to ensure that suspension and debarment is verified for all covered transactions of $25,000 or
more.
Views of Responsible Officials
For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report
FINDING 2024-006
Subject: Special Education Cluster (IDEA) - Procurement and Suspension and Debarment
Federal Agency: Department of Education
Federal Programs: Special Education Grants to States, Special Education Preschool Grants, COVID-19 -
Special Education Grants to States, COVID-19 - Special Education Preschool Grants
Assistance Listings Numbers: 84.027, 84.173
Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): HO27A220084, 21611-127-PN01,
22611-127-ARP, 22611-127-PN01,
23611-127-PN01, 23619-127-ARP,
22619-127-PN01, 23619-127-PN01
Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education
Compliance Requirement: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment
Audit Finding: Significant Deficiency
Condition and Context
An effective internal control system was not in place at the School Corporation to ensure
compliance with requirements related to the grant agreement and suspension and debarment compliance
requirements.
INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS
25
MADISON CONSOLIDATED SCHOOLS
SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS
(Continued)
Prior to entering into subawards and covered transactions with the Special Education Cluster
(SPED) award funds, recipients are required to verify that such contractors and subrecipients are not
suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded. "Covered transactions" include, but are not limited to,
contracts for goods and services awarded under a nonprocurement transaction (i.e., grant agreement) that
are expected to equal or exceed $25,000. The verification is to be done by checking the Excluded Parties
List System, collecting a certification from that person, or adding a clause or condition to the covered
transactions with that person. There was no internal control in place, such as an oversight, review, or
approval process, to ensure that contractors or subrecipients were not suspended, debarred, or otherwise
excluded.
The lack of internal controls was a systemic issue throughout the audit period.
Criteria
2 CFR 200.303 states in part:
"The non-Federal entity must:
(a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides
reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in
compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal
award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for
Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the
United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of
Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ."
Cause
The School Corporation did not have internal controls in pace to ensure the suspension and
debarment status for covered transactions it intended to pay with federal funds of the major program were
properly verified.
Effect
Without the proper design or implementation of internal controls, the internal control system cannot
be capable of effectively preventing, or detecting and correcting, material noncompliance. This could result
in the School Corporation paying a contractor who has been suspended or debarred, which would be
unallowable.
Questioned Costs
There were no questioned costs identified.
Recommendation
We recommended that management of the School Corporation strengthen its system of internal
controls to ensure that suspension and debarment is verified for all covered transactions of $25,000 or
more.
Views of Responsible Officials
For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report
FINDING 2024-006
Subject: Special Education Cluster (IDEA) - Procurement and Suspension and Debarment
Federal Agency: Department of Education
Federal Programs: Special Education Grants to States, Special Education Preschool Grants, COVID-19 -
Special Education Grants to States, COVID-19 - Special Education Preschool Grants
Assistance Listings Numbers: 84.027, 84.173
Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): HO27A220084, 21611-127-PN01,
22611-127-ARP, 22611-127-PN01,
23611-127-PN01, 23619-127-ARP,
22619-127-PN01, 23619-127-PN01
Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education
Compliance Requirement: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment
Audit Finding: Significant Deficiency
Condition and Context
An effective internal control system was not in place at the School Corporation to ensure
compliance with requirements related to the grant agreement and suspension and debarment compliance
requirements.
INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS
25
MADISON CONSOLIDATED SCHOOLS
SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS
(Continued)
Prior to entering into subawards and covered transactions with the Special Education Cluster
(SPED) award funds, recipients are required to verify that such contractors and subrecipients are not
suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded. "Covered transactions" include, but are not limited to,
contracts for goods and services awarded under a nonprocurement transaction (i.e., grant agreement) that
are expected to equal or exceed $25,000. The verification is to be done by checking the Excluded Parties
List System, collecting a certification from that person, or adding a clause or condition to the covered
transactions with that person. There was no internal control in place, such as an oversight, review, or
approval process, to ensure that contractors or subrecipients were not suspended, debarred, or otherwise
excluded.
The lack of internal controls was a systemic issue throughout the audit period.
Criteria
2 CFR 200.303 states in part:
"The non-Federal entity must:
(a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides
reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in
compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal
award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for
Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the
United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of
Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ."
Cause
The School Corporation did not have internal controls in pace to ensure the suspension and
debarment status for covered transactions it intended to pay with federal funds of the major program were
properly verified.
Effect
Without the proper design or implementation of internal controls, the internal control system cannot
be capable of effectively preventing, or detecting and correcting, material noncompliance. This could result
in the School Corporation paying a contractor who has been suspended or debarred, which would be
unallowable.
Questioned Costs
There were no questioned costs identified.
Recommendation
We recommended that management of the School Corporation strengthen its system of internal
controls to ensure that suspension and debarment is verified for all covered transactions of $25,000 or
more.
Views of Responsible Officials
For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report
FINDING 2024-006
Subject: Special Education Cluster (IDEA) - Procurement and Suspension and Debarment
Federal Agency: Department of Education
Federal Programs: Special Education Grants to States, Special Education Preschool Grants, COVID-19 -
Special Education Grants to States, COVID-19 - Special Education Preschool Grants
Assistance Listings Numbers: 84.027, 84.173
Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): HO27A220084, 21611-127-PN01,
22611-127-ARP, 22611-127-PN01,
23611-127-PN01, 23619-127-ARP,
22619-127-PN01, 23619-127-PN01
Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education
Compliance Requirement: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment
Audit Finding: Significant Deficiency
Condition and Context
An effective internal control system was not in place at the School Corporation to ensure
compliance with requirements related to the grant agreement and suspension and debarment compliance
requirements.
INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS
25
MADISON CONSOLIDATED SCHOOLS
SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS
(Continued)
Prior to entering into subawards and covered transactions with the Special Education Cluster
(SPED) award funds, recipients are required to verify that such contractors and subrecipients are not
suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded. "Covered transactions" include, but are not limited to,
contracts for goods and services awarded under a nonprocurement transaction (i.e., grant agreement) that
are expected to equal or exceed $25,000. The verification is to be done by checking the Excluded Parties
List System, collecting a certification from that person, or adding a clause or condition to the covered
transactions with that person. There was no internal control in place, such as an oversight, review, or
approval process, to ensure that contractors or subrecipients were not suspended, debarred, or otherwise
excluded.
The lack of internal controls was a systemic issue throughout the audit period.
Criteria
2 CFR 200.303 states in part:
"The non-Federal entity must:
(a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides
reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in
compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal
award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for
Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the
United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of
Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ."
Cause
The School Corporation did not have internal controls in pace to ensure the suspension and
debarment status for covered transactions it intended to pay with federal funds of the major program were
properly verified.
Effect
Without the proper design or implementation of internal controls, the internal control system cannot
be capable of effectively preventing, or detecting and correcting, material noncompliance. This could result
in the School Corporation paying a contractor who has been suspended or debarred, which would be
unallowable.
Questioned Costs
There were no questioned costs identified.
Recommendation
We recommended that management of the School Corporation strengthen its system of internal
controls to ensure that suspension and debarment is verified for all covered transactions of $25,000 or
more.
Views of Responsible Officials
For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report
FINDING 2024-006
Subject: Special Education Cluster (IDEA) - Procurement and Suspension and Debarment
Federal Agency: Department of Education
Federal Programs: Special Education Grants to States, Special Education Preschool Grants, COVID-19 -
Special Education Grants to States, COVID-19 - Special Education Preschool Grants
Assistance Listings Numbers: 84.027, 84.173
Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): HO27A220084, 21611-127-PN01,
22611-127-ARP, 22611-127-PN01,
23611-127-PN01, 23619-127-ARP,
22619-127-PN01, 23619-127-PN01
Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education
Compliance Requirement: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment
Audit Finding: Significant Deficiency
Condition and Context
An effective internal control system was not in place at the School Corporation to ensure
compliance with requirements related to the grant agreement and suspension and debarment compliance
requirements.
INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS
25
MADISON CONSOLIDATED SCHOOLS
SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS
(Continued)
Prior to entering into subawards and covered transactions with the Special Education Cluster
(SPED) award funds, recipients are required to verify that such contractors and subrecipients are not
suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded. "Covered transactions" include, but are not limited to,
contracts for goods and services awarded under a nonprocurement transaction (i.e., grant agreement) that
are expected to equal or exceed $25,000. The verification is to be done by checking the Excluded Parties
List System, collecting a certification from that person, or adding a clause or condition to the covered
transactions with that person. There was no internal control in place, such as an oversight, review, or
approval process, to ensure that contractors or subrecipients were not suspended, debarred, or otherwise
excluded.
The lack of internal controls was a systemic issue throughout the audit period.
Criteria
2 CFR 200.303 states in part:
"The non-Federal entity must:
(a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides
reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in
compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal
award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for
Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the
United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of
Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ."
Cause
The School Corporation did not have internal controls in pace to ensure the suspension and
debarment status for covered transactions it intended to pay with federal funds of the major program were
properly verified.
Effect
Without the proper design or implementation of internal controls, the internal control system cannot
be capable of effectively preventing, or detecting and correcting, material noncompliance. This could result
in the School Corporation paying a contractor who has been suspended or debarred, which would be
unallowable.
Questioned Costs
There were no questioned costs identified.
Recommendation
We recommended that management of the School Corporation strengthen its system of internal
controls to ensure that suspension and debarment is verified for all covered transactions of $25,000 or
more.
Views of Responsible Officials
For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report