Audit 341676

FY End
2019-03-31
Total Expended
$4.24M
Findings
6
Programs
4
Organization: Monticello Housing Authority (NY)
Year: 2019 Accepted: 2025-02-07

Organization Exclusion Status:

Checking exclusion status...

Findings

ID Ref Severity Repeat Requirement
522396 2019-002 Material Weakness - N
522397 2019-003 Material Weakness - N
522398 2019-004 Material Weakness - AB
1098838 2019-002 Material Weakness - N
1098839 2019-003 Material Weakness - N
1098840 2019-004 Material Weakness - AB

Programs

ALN Program Spent Major Findings
14.871 Section 8 Housing Choice Vouchers $3.82M Yes 3
14.850 Public and Indian Housing $294,563 - 0
14.872 Public Housing Capital Fund $85,540 - 0
14.870 Resident Opportunity and Supportive Services $37,079 - 0

Contacts

Name Title Type
LTPWJJ7UB6L6 Sharlene Leroy Auditee
8457946855 Benjamin Porter Auditor
No contacts on file

Notes to SEFA

Accounting Policies: Accrual GAAP Basis De Minimis Rate Used: N Rate Explanation: De Minimus cost rate not used.

Finding Details

2019-002 Finding – (Housing Choice Voucher– (14.871)) During our review of special tests and provisions we determined that the Authority did not have a depository agreement on file with its financial institution. Criteria – Housing Authorities are required to enter into depository agreements with their financial institution using the HUD-51999 or a form required by HUD in the ACC. The agreements serve as safeguards for Federal funds and provide third-party rights to HUD. Effect of Condition – Lack of safeguards could put the Authority’s assets as risk. Cause of Condition – No such agreement could be found upon request. Recommendation – We recommend that the Authority have this agreement signed. PHA Response and Corrective Action Plan – The agreement will be completed and on file as the Authority has already contacted the financial institution to execute the agreement. PHA Contact and Resolution Date Rosalind Natale, March 31, 2020
2019-003 Finding – (Housing Choice Voucher– (14.871)) During our review of 40 Housing Choice Voucher tenant files, 1 file did not have an annual inspection. Criteria – HUD requires the Authority to inspect all units annually to ensure that the units continue to meet housing quality standards. Effect of Condition – If procedures are not followed, the awarding agency, may suspend or revoke federal funding. Cause of Condition – Policies and procedures were not followed. Recommendation – We recommend that the Authority implement procedures to ensure all units are inspected annually as prescribed by HUD. PHA Response and Corrective Action Plan – All files will be reviewed to ensure annual inspections are performed as required. PHA Contact and Resolution Date Rosalind Natale, March 31, 2020
2019-004 Finding – (Housing Choice Voucher– (14.871)) During our review of cost principles and allocation of costs it was noted that the Authority does not have a documented Cost Allocation Plan . Criteria – Cost allocation plans developed by the Authority should have sufficient documentation to substantiate the basis for how costs are allocated among the different programs and related parties. Effect of Condition – Due to the lack of full documentation to substantiate the basis for cost allocation, the amounts allocated among the programs and related parties could potentially be materially misstated. Cause of Condition – Cost allocation plans were developed without fully documenting procedures and methods used in determining allocation percentages. Recommendation – We recommend that the Authority document and adopt a plan that is in accordance with Appendix IV of the 2 CFR 200 regulation. PHA Response and Corrective Action Plan – The agreement will be completed and on file as the Authority has already presented it to the board. PHA Contact and Resolution Date Rosalind Natale, March 31, 2020
2019-002 Finding – (Housing Choice Voucher– (14.871)) During our review of special tests and provisions we determined that the Authority did not have a depository agreement on file with its financial institution. Criteria – Housing Authorities are required to enter into depository agreements with their financial institution using the HUD-51999 or a form required by HUD in the ACC. The agreements serve as safeguards for Federal funds and provide third-party rights to HUD. Effect of Condition – Lack of safeguards could put the Authority’s assets as risk. Cause of Condition – No such agreement could be found upon request. Recommendation – We recommend that the Authority have this agreement signed. PHA Response and Corrective Action Plan – The agreement will be completed and on file as the Authority has already contacted the financial institution to execute the agreement. PHA Contact and Resolution Date Rosalind Natale, March 31, 2020
2019-003 Finding – (Housing Choice Voucher– (14.871)) During our review of 40 Housing Choice Voucher tenant files, 1 file did not have an annual inspection. Criteria – HUD requires the Authority to inspect all units annually to ensure that the units continue to meet housing quality standards. Effect of Condition – If procedures are not followed, the awarding agency, may suspend or revoke federal funding. Cause of Condition – Policies and procedures were not followed. Recommendation – We recommend that the Authority implement procedures to ensure all units are inspected annually as prescribed by HUD. PHA Response and Corrective Action Plan – All files will be reviewed to ensure annual inspections are performed as required. PHA Contact and Resolution Date Rosalind Natale, March 31, 2020
2019-004 Finding – (Housing Choice Voucher– (14.871)) During our review of cost principles and allocation of costs it was noted that the Authority does not have a documented Cost Allocation Plan . Criteria – Cost allocation plans developed by the Authority should have sufficient documentation to substantiate the basis for how costs are allocated among the different programs and related parties. Effect of Condition – Due to the lack of full documentation to substantiate the basis for cost allocation, the amounts allocated among the programs and related parties could potentially be materially misstated. Cause of Condition – Cost allocation plans were developed without fully documenting procedures and methods used in determining allocation percentages. Recommendation – We recommend that the Authority document and adopt a plan that is in accordance with Appendix IV of the 2 CFR 200 regulation. PHA Response and Corrective Action Plan – The agreement will be completed and on file as the Authority has already presented it to the board. PHA Contact and Resolution Date Rosalind Natale, March 31, 2020