Audit 341337

FY End
2024-06-30
Total Expended
$866,663
Findings
4
Programs
7
Year: 2024 Accepted: 2025-02-05

Organization Exclusion Status:

Checking exclusion status...

Findings

ID Ref Severity Repeat Requirement
522118 2024-002 - - P
522119 2024-003 Significant Deficiency - P
1098560 2024-002 - - P
1098561 2024-003 Significant Deficiency - P

Programs

ALN Program Spent Major Findings
14.231 Emergency Solutions Grant Program $260,539 Yes 2
11.307 Economic Adjustment Assistance $239,986 - 0
21.008 Low Income Taxpayer Clinics $84,487 - 0
84.002 Adult Education - Basic Grants to States $60,000 - 0
93.569 Community Services Block Grant $49,148 - 0
21.027 Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds $43,000 Yes 0
17.259 Wioa Youth Activities $12,240 - 0

Contacts

Name Title Type
KBALW8ATHFK8 Mary Chin Auditee
6174269492 Barbara J. Rowell Auditor
No contacts on file

Notes to SEFA

Title: 1. BASIS OF PRESENTATION Accounting Policies: See Note 2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies De Minimis Rate Used: N Rate Explanation: See Note 3. Indirect Cost Rate The accompanying schedule of expenditures of federal awards (the Schedule) includes the federal award activity of Asian American Civic Association, Inc. (AACA) under programs of the federal government for the year ended June 30, 2024. The information in this Schedule is presented in accordance with the requirements of Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200, Uniform Administrative Cost Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance). Because the Schedule presents only a selected portion of the operations of AACA, it is not intended to and does not present the financial position, changes in net assets, or cash flows of AACA.
Title: 2. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES Accounting Policies: See Note 2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies De Minimis Rate Used: N Rate Explanation: See Note 3. Indirect Cost Rate Expenditures reported on the Schedule are reported on the accrual basis of accounting. Such expenditures are recognized following the cost principles contained in the Uniform Guidance, wherein certain types of expenditures are not allowable or are limited as to reimbursement.
Title: 3. INDIRECT COST RATE Accounting Policies: See Note 2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies De Minimis Rate Used: N Rate Explanation: See Note 3. Indirect Cost Rate AACA has elected not to use the 10% de minimis indirect cost rate allowed under the Uniform Guidance for any of their federal contracts.
Title: 4. AWARDS PASSED THROUGH TO SUBRECIPIENTS Accounting Policies: See Note 2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies De Minimis Rate Used: N Rate Explanation: See Note 3. Indirect Cost Rate There were no awards passed through to subrecipients by AACA for the year ended June 30, 2024.
Title: 5. PASS THROUGH ENTITY ID NUMBERS Accounting Policies: See Note 2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies De Minimis Rate Used: N Rate Explanation: See Note 3. Indirect Cost Rate A ED22HDQ3070112 B C-56435-23 C 122-010-123 D 23-LITC0647-01-01 24-LITC0647-02-02 E 2304035 F SLFRP0153 G 0495-000614-2024-2182 H 111-A50-888-00

Finding Details

Condition: One pay period requested for reimbursement exceeded the payroll that was paid to the employee by $783 as the request was prepared based on the employee’s time sheet, not based on the payroll paid. Criteria: Federal funds should be expended only for allowable activities and allowable costs. Cause: Ineffective oversight over the preparation of requests for reimbursement. Effect: Although not material, the grant was billed for a non-allowable activity and a non-allowable cost, which could be disallowed. Recommendation: Closer attention should be paid when preparing the requests for reimbursement to ensure only allowable expenses are being included in the request. A secondary review of the request and supporting documentation should be performed by someone other than the preparer. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: We acknowledge the lack of oversight in preparing the reimbursement request, which resulted in an amount exceeding the payroll paid to the employee. This issue arose due to reliance on timesheet data without reconciling it with actual payroll disbursements. A detailed checklist will be introduced to ensure all requests for reimbursement match supporting payroll documentation. This checklist will include a reconciliation step for timesheet data and payroll disbursement records. Staff involved in grant management and reimbursement preparation will receive additional instruction on federal compliance requirements, with a focus on allowable costs and activities.
Condition: For one pay period, the hours entered into the payroll system for an employee were less than the hours per their time sheet. Criteria: In accordance with the procedures established by AACA, payroll is to be reviewed by both the Director of Finance and CEO. Cause: Controls were not implemented and errors are going undetected / unnoticed. Effect: The employee was underpaid. Also, the incorrect amount was requested for reimbursement. Recommendation: Closer attention should be paid when performing the review of payroll to ensure that all employee hours and dollars are accurate and in agreement with the supporting documentation (ie. employee time sheets). Also, the employee should be retroactively paid. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: We recognize the error in payroll hours and acknowledge the need for stricter review procedures. The underpaid employee has already received retroactive compensation in the pay period ending August 30, 2024 to rectify the error. A secondary review process will be implemented which will involve a designated staff member reconciling hours recorded on timesheets with the payroll system entries before final approval. Staff involved in payroll processing will be reminded on the importance of accuracy and the potential implications of errors. This will include step-by-step instructions for validating payroll entries.
Condition: One pay period requested for reimbursement exceeded the payroll that was paid to the employee by $783 as the request was prepared based on the employee’s time sheet, not based on the payroll paid. Criteria: Federal funds should be expended only for allowable activities and allowable costs. Cause: Ineffective oversight over the preparation of requests for reimbursement. Effect: Although not material, the grant was billed for a non-allowable activity and a non-allowable cost, which could be disallowed. Recommendation: Closer attention should be paid when preparing the requests for reimbursement to ensure only allowable expenses are being included in the request. A secondary review of the request and supporting documentation should be performed by someone other than the preparer. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: We acknowledge the lack of oversight in preparing the reimbursement request, which resulted in an amount exceeding the payroll paid to the employee. This issue arose due to reliance on timesheet data without reconciling it with actual payroll disbursements. A detailed checklist will be introduced to ensure all requests for reimbursement match supporting payroll documentation. This checklist will include a reconciliation step for timesheet data and payroll disbursement records. Staff involved in grant management and reimbursement preparation will receive additional instruction on federal compliance requirements, with a focus on allowable costs and activities.
Condition: For one pay period, the hours entered into the payroll system for an employee were less than the hours per their time sheet. Criteria: In accordance with the procedures established by AACA, payroll is to be reviewed by both the Director of Finance and CEO. Cause: Controls were not implemented and errors are going undetected / unnoticed. Effect: The employee was underpaid. Also, the incorrect amount was requested for reimbursement. Recommendation: Closer attention should be paid when performing the review of payroll to ensure that all employee hours and dollars are accurate and in agreement with the supporting documentation (ie. employee time sheets). Also, the employee should be retroactively paid. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: We recognize the error in payroll hours and acknowledge the need for stricter review procedures. The underpaid employee has already received retroactive compensation in the pay period ending August 30, 2024 to rectify the error. A secondary review process will be implemented which will involve a designated staff member reconciling hours recorded on timesheets with the payroll system entries before final approval. Staff involved in payroll processing will be reminded on the importance of accuracy and the potential implications of errors. This will include step-by-step instructions for validating payroll entries.