The audit of federal grant reimbursements indicated the District did not request certain reimbursements for actual grant expenditures during the 2021-22 fiscal year on a timely basis.
The audit of payroll transactions allocated to the Title I, Part A grant identified instances of 30 minutes of "prep time" omitted from the time sheet entries, but the 30 minutes of "prep time" were included in the ending number of hours worked and paid. Additionally, certain employees charged to the ESSER grants were not approved in the official minutes to be charged to the respective grants.
It was noted the District did not have formal written policies that address Uniform Grant Guidance requirements, such as: Determining the allowability of costs in accordance with federal cost principles and the terms and conditions of the federal award; and the mandatory disclosure of all violations of federal criminal law involving fraud, bribery, or gratuity violations potentially affecting the federal award.
It was noted during the review of purchase orders that a number of purchase orders greater than $25,000 were missing evidence of verification to ensure a vendor is not debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded from or ineligible for participation in federal assistance programs or activities.
The audit of federal grant reimbursements indicated the District did not request certain reimbursements for actual grant expenditures during the 2021-22 fiscal year on a timely basis.
The audit of payroll transactions allocated to the Title I, Part A grant identified instances of 30 minutes of "prep time" omitted from the time sheet entries, but the 30 minutes of "prep time" were included in the ending number of hours worked and paid. Additionally, certain employees charged to the ESSER grants were not approved in the official minutes to be charged to the respective grants.
It was noted the District did not have formal written policies that address Uniform Grant Guidance requirements, such as: Determining the allowability of costs in accordance with federal cost principles and the terms and conditions of the federal award; and the mandatory disclosure of all violations of federal criminal law involving fraud, bribery, or gratuity violations potentially affecting the federal award.
It was noted during the review of purchase orders that a number of purchase orders greater than $25,000 were missing evidence of verification to ensure a vendor is not debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded from or ineligible for participation in federal assistance programs or activities.
The audit of federal grant reimbursements indicated the District did not request certain reimbursements for actual grant expenditures during the 2021-22 fiscal year on a timely basis.
The audit of payroll transactions allocated to the Title I, Part A grant identified instances of 30 minutes of "prep time" omitted from the time sheet entries, but the 30 minutes of "prep time" were included in the ending number of hours worked and paid. Additionally, certain employees charged to the ESSER grants were not approved in the official minutes to be charged to the respective grants.
It was noted the District did not have formal written policies that address Uniform Grant Guidance requirements, such as: Determining the allowability of costs in accordance with federal cost principles and the terms and conditions of the federal award; and the mandatory disclosure of all violations of federal criminal law involving fraud, bribery, or gratuity violations potentially affecting the federal award.
It was noted during the review of purchase orders that a number of purchase orders greater than $25,000 were missing evidence of verification to ensure a vendor is not debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded from or ineligible for participation in federal assistance programs or activities.
The audit of federal grant reimbursements indicated the District did not request certain reimbursements for actual grant expenditures during the 2021-22 fiscal year on a timely basis.
The audit of payroll transactions allocated to the Title I, Part A grant identified instances of 30 minutes of "prep time" omitted from the time sheet entries, but the 30 minutes of "prep time" were included in the ending number of hours worked and paid. Additionally, certain employees charged to the ESSER grants were not approved in the official minutes to be charged to the respective grants.
It was noted the District did not have formal written policies that address Uniform Grant Guidance requirements, such as: Determining the allowability of costs in accordance with federal cost principles and the terms and conditions of the federal award; and the mandatory disclosure of all violations of federal criminal law involving fraud, bribery, or gratuity violations potentially affecting the federal award.
It was noted during the review of purchase orders that a number of purchase orders greater than $25,000 were missing evidence of verification to ensure a vendor is not debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded from or ineligible for participation in federal assistance programs or activities.
The audit of federal grant reimbursements indicated the District did not request certain reimbursements for actual grant expenditures during the 2021-22 fiscal year on a timely basis.
The audit of payroll transactions allocated to the Title I, Part A grant identified instances of 30 minutes of "prep time" omitted from the time sheet entries, but the 30 minutes of "prep time" were included in the ending number of hours worked and paid. Additionally, certain employees charged to the ESSER grants were not approved in the official minutes to be charged to the respective grants.
It was noted the District did not have formal written policies that address Uniform Grant Guidance requirements, such as: Determining the allowability of costs in accordance with federal cost principles and the terms and conditions of the federal award; and the mandatory disclosure of all violations of federal criminal law involving fraud, bribery, or gratuity violations potentially affecting the federal award.
It was noted during the review of purchase orders that a number of purchase orders greater than $25,000 were missing evidence of verification to ensure a vendor is not debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded from or ineligible for participation in federal assistance programs or activities.
The audit of federal grant reimbursements indicated the District did not request certain reimbursements for actual grant expenditures during the 2021-22 fiscal year on a timely basis.
It was noted the District did not have formal written policies that address Uniform Grant Guidance requirements, such as: Determining the allowability of costs in accordance with federal cost principles and the terms and conditions of the federal award; and the mandatory disclosure of all violations of federal criminal law involving fraud, bribery, or gratuity violations potentially affecting the federal award.
It was noted during the review of purchase orders that a number of purchase orders greater than $25,000 were missing evidence of verification to ensure a vendor is not debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded from or ineligible for participation in federal assistance programs or activities.
The audit of federal grant reimbursements indicated the District did not request certain reimbursements for actual grant expenditures during the 2021-22 fiscal year on a timely basis.
It was noted the District did not have formal written policies that address Uniform Grant Guidance requirements, such as: Determining the allowability of costs in accordance with federal cost principles and the terms and conditions of the federal award; and the mandatory disclosure of all violations of federal criminal law involving fraud, bribery, or gratuity violations potentially affecting the federal award.
It was noted during the review of purchase orders that a number of purchase orders greater than $25,000 were missing evidence of verification to ensure a vendor is not debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded from or ineligible for participation in federal assistance programs or activities.
The audit of federal grant reimbursements indicated the District did not request certain reimbursements for actual grant expenditures during the 2021-22 fiscal year on a timely basis.
It was noted the District did not have formal written policies that address Uniform Grant Guidance requirements, such as: Determining the allowability of costs in accordance with federal cost principles and the terms and conditions of the federal award; and the mandatory disclosure of all violations of federal criminal law involving fraud, bribery, or gratuity violations potentially affecting the federal award.
It was noted during the review of purchase orders that a number of purchase orders greater than $25,000 were missing evidence of verification to ensure a vendor is not debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded from or ineligible for participation in federal assistance programs or activities.
The audit of federal grant reimbursements indicated the District did not request certain reimbursements for actual grant expenditures during the 2021-22 fiscal year on a timely basis.
It was noted the District did not have formal written policies that address Uniform Grant Guidance requirements, such as: Determining the allowability of costs in accordance with federal cost principles and the terms and conditions of the federal award; and the mandatory disclosure of all violations of federal criminal law involving fraud, bribery, or gratuity violations potentially affecting the federal award.
It was noted during the review of purchase orders that a number of purchase orders greater than $25,000 were missing evidence of verification to ensure a vendor is not debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded from or ineligible for participation in federal assistance programs or activities.
The audit of federal grant reimbursements indicated the District did not request certain reimbursements for actual grant expenditures during the 2021-22 fiscal year on a timely basis.
It was noted the District did not have formal written policies that address Uniform Grant Guidance requirements, such as: Determining the allowability of costs in accordance with federal cost principles and the terms and conditions of the federal award; and the mandatory disclosure of all violations of federal criminal law involving fraud, bribery, or gratuity violations potentially affecting the federal award.
It was noted during the review of purchase orders that a number of purchase orders greater than $25,000 were missing evidence of verification to ensure a vendor is not debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded from or ineligible for participation in federal assistance programs or activities.
The audit of federal grant reimbursements indicated the District did not request certain reimbursements for actual grant expenditures during the 2021-22 fiscal year on a timely basis.
It was noted the District did not have formal written policies that address Uniform Grant Guidance requirements, such as: Determining the allowability of costs in accordance with federal cost principles and the terms and conditions of the federal award; and the mandatory disclosure of all violations of federal criminal law involving fraud, bribery, or gratuity violations potentially affecting the federal award.
It was noted during the review of purchase orders that a number of purchase orders greater than $25,000 were missing evidence of verification to ensure a vendor is not debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded from or ineligible for participation in federal assistance programs or activities.
It was noted the District did not have formal written policies that address Uniform Grant Guidance requirements, such as: Determining the allowability of costs in accordance with federal cost principles and the terms and conditions of the federal award; and the mandatory disclosure of all violations of federal criminal law involving fraud, bribery, or gratuity violations potentially affecting the federal award.
It was noted during the review of purchase orders that a number of purchase orders greater than $25,000 were missing evidence of verification to ensure a vendor is not debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded from or ineligible for participation in federal assistance programs or activities.
It was noted the District did not have formal written policies that address Uniform Grant Guidance requirements, such as: Determining the allowability of costs in accordance with federal cost principles and the terms and conditions of the federal award; and the mandatory disclosure of all violations of federal criminal law involving fraud, bribery, or gratuity violations potentially affecting the federal award.
It was noted during the review of purchase orders that a number of purchase orders greater than $25,000 were missing evidence of verification to ensure a vendor is not debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded from or ineligible for participation in federal assistance programs or activities.
It was noted the District did not have formal written policies that address Uniform Grant Guidance requirements, such as: Determining the allowability of costs in accordance with federal cost principles and the terms and conditions of the federal award; and the mandatory disclosure of all violations of federal criminal law involving fraud, bribery, or gratuity violations potentially affecting the federal award.
It was noted during the review of purchase orders that a number of purchase orders greater than $25,000 were missing evidence of verification to ensure a vendor is not debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded from or ineligible for participation in federal assistance programs or activities.
It was noted the District did not have formal written policies that address Uniform Grant Guidance requirements, such as: Determining the allowability of costs in accordance with federal cost principles and the terms and conditions of the federal award; and the mandatory disclosure of all violations of federal criminal law involving fraud, bribery, or gratuity violations potentially affecting the federal award.
It was noted during the review of purchase orders that a number of purchase orders greater than $25,000 were missing evidence of verification to ensure a vendor is not debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded from or ineligible for participation in federal assistance programs or activities.
It was noted the District did not have formal written policies that address Uniform Grant Guidance requirements, such as: Determining the allowability of costs in accordance with federal cost principles and the terms and conditions of the federal award; and the mandatory disclosure of all violations of federal criminal law involving fraud, bribery, or gratuity violations potentially affecting the federal award.
It was noted during the review of purchase orders that a number of purchase orders greater than $25,000 were missing evidence of verification to ensure a vendor is not debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded from or ineligible for participation in federal assistance programs or activities.
It was noted the District did not have formal written policies that address Uniform Grant Guidance requirements, such as: Determining the allowability of costs in accordance with federal cost principles and the terms and conditions of the federal award; and the mandatory disclosure of all violations of federal criminal law involving fraud, bribery, or gratuity violations potentially affecting the federal award.
It was noted during the review of purchase orders that a number of purchase orders greater than $25,000 were missing evidence of verification to ensure a vendor is not debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded from or ineligible for participation in federal assistance programs or activities.
It was noted the District did not have formal written policies that address Uniform Grant Guidance requirements, such as: Determining the allowability of costs in accordance with federal cost principles and the terms and conditions of the federal award; and the mandatory disclosure of all violations of federal criminal law involving fraud, bribery, or gratuity violations potentially affecting the federal award.
It was noted during the review of purchase orders that a number of purchase orders greater than $25,000 were missing evidence of verification to ensure a vendor is not debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded from or ineligible for participation in federal assistance programs or activities.
It was noted the District did not have formal written policies that address Uniform Grant Guidance requirements, such as: Determining the allowability of costs in accordance with federal cost principles and the terms and conditions of the federal award; and the mandatory disclosure of all violations of federal criminal law involving fraud, bribery, or gratuity violations potentially affecting the federal award.
It was noted during the review of purchase orders that a number of purchase orders greater than $25,000 were missing evidence of verification to ensure a vendor is not debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded from or ineligible for participation in federal assistance programs or activities.
It was noted the District did not have formal written policies that address Uniform Grant Guidance requirements, such as: Determining the allowability of costs in accordance with federal cost principles and the terms and conditions of the federal award; and the mandatory disclosure of all violations of federal criminal law involving fraud, bribery, or gratuity violations potentially affecting the federal award.
It was noted during the review of purchase orders that a number of purchase orders greater than $25,000 were missing evidence of verification to ensure a vendor is not debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded from or ineligible for participation in federal assistance programs or activities.
It was noted the District did not have formal written policies that address Uniform Grant Guidance requirements, such as: Determining the allowability of costs in accordance with federal cost principles and the terms and conditions of the federal award; and the mandatory disclosure of all violations of federal criminal law involving fraud, bribery, or gratuity violations potentially affecting the federal award.
It was noted during the review of purchase orders that a number of purchase orders greater than $25,000 were missing evidence of verification to ensure a vendor is not debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded from or ineligible for participation in federal assistance programs or activities.
The audit of federal grant reimbursements indicated the District did not request certain reimbursements for actual grant expenditures during the 2021-22 fiscal year on a timely basis.
The audit of payroll transactions allocated to the Title I, Part A grant identified instances of 30 minutes of "prep time" omitted from the time sheet entries, but the 30 minutes of "prep time" were included in the ending number of hours worked and paid. Additionally, certain employees charged to the ESSER grants were not approved in the official minutes to be charged to the respective grants.
It was noted the District did not have formal written policies that address Uniform Grant Guidance requirements, such as: Determining the allowability of costs in accordance with federal cost principles and the terms and conditions of the federal award; and the mandatory disclosure of all violations of federal criminal law involving fraud, bribery, or gratuity violations potentially affecting the federal award.
It was noted during the review of purchase orders that a number of purchase orders greater than $25,000 were missing evidence of verification to ensure a vendor is not debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded from or ineligible for participation in federal assistance programs or activities.
The audit of federal grant reimbursements indicated the District did not request certain reimbursements for actual grant expenditures during the 2021-22 fiscal year on a timely basis.
The audit of payroll transactions allocated to the Title I, Part A grant identified instances of 30 minutes of "prep time" omitted from the time sheet entries, but the 30 minutes of "prep time" were included in the ending number of hours worked and paid. Additionally, certain employees charged to the ESSER grants were not approved in the official minutes to be charged to the respective grants.
It was noted the District did not have formal written policies that address Uniform Grant Guidance requirements, such as: Determining the allowability of costs in accordance with federal cost principles and the terms and conditions of the federal award; and the mandatory disclosure of all violations of federal criminal law involving fraud, bribery, or gratuity violations potentially affecting the federal award.
It was noted during the review of purchase orders that a number of purchase orders greater than $25,000 were missing evidence of verification to ensure a vendor is not debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded from or ineligible for participation in federal assistance programs or activities.
The audit of federal grant reimbursements indicated the District did not request certain reimbursements for actual grant expenditures during the 2021-22 fiscal year on a timely basis.
The audit of payroll transactions allocated to the Title I, Part A grant identified instances of 30 minutes of "prep time" omitted from the time sheet entries, but the 30 minutes of "prep time" were included in the ending number of hours worked and paid. Additionally, certain employees charged to the ESSER grants were not approved in the official minutes to be charged to the respective grants.
It was noted the District did not have formal written policies that address Uniform Grant Guidance requirements, such as: Determining the allowability of costs in accordance with federal cost principles and the terms and conditions of the federal award; and the mandatory disclosure of all violations of federal criminal law involving fraud, bribery, or gratuity violations potentially affecting the federal award.
It was noted during the review of purchase orders that a number of purchase orders greater than $25,000 were missing evidence of verification to ensure a vendor is not debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded from or ineligible for participation in federal assistance programs or activities.
The audit of federal grant reimbursements indicated the District did not request certain reimbursements for actual grant expenditures during the 2021-22 fiscal year on a timely basis.
The audit of payroll transactions allocated to the Title I, Part A grant identified instances of 30 minutes of "prep time" omitted from the time sheet entries, but the 30 minutes of "prep time" were included in the ending number of hours worked and paid. Additionally, certain employees charged to the ESSER grants were not approved in the official minutes to be charged to the respective grants.
It was noted the District did not have formal written policies that address Uniform Grant Guidance requirements, such as: Determining the allowability of costs in accordance with federal cost principles and the terms and conditions of the federal award; and the mandatory disclosure of all violations of federal criminal law involving fraud, bribery, or gratuity violations potentially affecting the federal award.
It was noted during the review of purchase orders that a number of purchase orders greater than $25,000 were missing evidence of verification to ensure a vendor is not debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded from or ineligible for participation in federal assistance programs or activities.
The audit of federal grant reimbursements indicated the District did not request certain reimbursements for actual grant expenditures during the 2021-22 fiscal year on a timely basis.
The audit of payroll transactions allocated to the Title I, Part A grant identified instances of 30 minutes of "prep time" omitted from the time sheet entries, but the 30 minutes of "prep time" were included in the ending number of hours worked and paid. Additionally, certain employees charged to the ESSER grants were not approved in the official minutes to be charged to the respective grants.
It was noted the District did not have formal written policies that address Uniform Grant Guidance requirements, such as: Determining the allowability of costs in accordance with federal cost principles and the terms and conditions of the federal award; and the mandatory disclosure of all violations of federal criminal law involving fraud, bribery, or gratuity violations potentially affecting the federal award.
It was noted during the review of purchase orders that a number of purchase orders greater than $25,000 were missing evidence of verification to ensure a vendor is not debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded from or ineligible for participation in federal assistance programs or activities.
The audit of federal grant reimbursements indicated the District did not request certain reimbursements for actual grant expenditures during the 2021-22 fiscal year on a timely basis.
It was noted the District did not have formal written policies that address Uniform Grant Guidance requirements, such as: Determining the allowability of costs in accordance with federal cost principles and the terms and conditions of the federal award; and the mandatory disclosure of all violations of federal criminal law involving fraud, bribery, or gratuity violations potentially affecting the federal award.
It was noted during the review of purchase orders that a number of purchase orders greater than $25,000 were missing evidence of verification to ensure a vendor is not debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded from or ineligible for participation in federal assistance programs or activities.
The audit of federal grant reimbursements indicated the District did not request certain reimbursements for actual grant expenditures during the 2021-22 fiscal year on a timely basis.
It was noted the District did not have formal written policies that address Uniform Grant Guidance requirements, such as: Determining the allowability of costs in accordance with federal cost principles and the terms and conditions of the federal award; and the mandatory disclosure of all violations of federal criminal law involving fraud, bribery, or gratuity violations potentially affecting the federal award.
It was noted during the review of purchase orders that a number of purchase orders greater than $25,000 were missing evidence of verification to ensure a vendor is not debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded from or ineligible for participation in federal assistance programs or activities.
The audit of federal grant reimbursements indicated the District did not request certain reimbursements for actual grant expenditures during the 2021-22 fiscal year on a timely basis.
It was noted the District did not have formal written policies that address Uniform Grant Guidance requirements, such as: Determining the allowability of costs in accordance with federal cost principles and the terms and conditions of the federal award; and the mandatory disclosure of all violations of federal criminal law involving fraud, bribery, or gratuity violations potentially affecting the federal award.
It was noted during the review of purchase orders that a number of purchase orders greater than $25,000 were missing evidence of verification to ensure a vendor is not debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded from or ineligible for participation in federal assistance programs or activities.
The audit of federal grant reimbursements indicated the District did not request certain reimbursements for actual grant expenditures during the 2021-22 fiscal year on a timely basis.
It was noted the District did not have formal written policies that address Uniform Grant Guidance requirements, such as: Determining the allowability of costs in accordance with federal cost principles and the terms and conditions of the federal award; and the mandatory disclosure of all violations of federal criminal law involving fraud, bribery, or gratuity violations potentially affecting the federal award.
It was noted during the review of purchase orders that a number of purchase orders greater than $25,000 were missing evidence of verification to ensure a vendor is not debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded from or ineligible for participation in federal assistance programs or activities.
The audit of federal grant reimbursements indicated the District did not request certain reimbursements for actual grant expenditures during the 2021-22 fiscal year on a timely basis.
It was noted the District did not have formal written policies that address Uniform Grant Guidance requirements, such as: Determining the allowability of costs in accordance with federal cost principles and the terms and conditions of the federal award; and the mandatory disclosure of all violations of federal criminal law involving fraud, bribery, or gratuity violations potentially affecting the federal award.
It was noted during the review of purchase orders that a number of purchase orders greater than $25,000 were missing evidence of verification to ensure a vendor is not debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded from or ineligible for participation in federal assistance programs or activities.
The audit of federal grant reimbursements indicated the District did not request certain reimbursements for actual grant expenditures during the 2021-22 fiscal year on a timely basis.
It was noted the District did not have formal written policies that address Uniform Grant Guidance requirements, such as: Determining the allowability of costs in accordance with federal cost principles and the terms and conditions of the federal award; and the mandatory disclosure of all violations of federal criminal law involving fraud, bribery, or gratuity violations potentially affecting the federal award.
It was noted during the review of purchase orders that a number of purchase orders greater than $25,000 were missing evidence of verification to ensure a vendor is not debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded from or ineligible for participation in federal assistance programs or activities.
It was noted the District did not have formal written policies that address Uniform Grant Guidance requirements, such as: Determining the allowability of costs in accordance with federal cost principles and the terms and conditions of the federal award; and the mandatory disclosure of all violations of federal criminal law involving fraud, bribery, or gratuity violations potentially affecting the federal award.
It was noted during the review of purchase orders that a number of purchase orders greater than $25,000 were missing evidence of verification to ensure a vendor is not debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded from or ineligible for participation in federal assistance programs or activities.
It was noted the District did not have formal written policies that address Uniform Grant Guidance requirements, such as: Determining the allowability of costs in accordance with federal cost principles and the terms and conditions of the federal award; and the mandatory disclosure of all violations of federal criminal law involving fraud, bribery, or gratuity violations potentially affecting the federal award.
It was noted during the review of purchase orders that a number of purchase orders greater than $25,000 were missing evidence of verification to ensure a vendor is not debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded from or ineligible for participation in federal assistance programs or activities.
It was noted the District did not have formal written policies that address Uniform Grant Guidance requirements, such as: Determining the allowability of costs in accordance with federal cost principles and the terms and conditions of the federal award; and the mandatory disclosure of all violations of federal criminal law involving fraud, bribery, or gratuity violations potentially affecting the federal award.
It was noted during the review of purchase orders that a number of purchase orders greater than $25,000 were missing evidence of verification to ensure a vendor is not debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded from or ineligible for participation in federal assistance programs or activities.
It was noted the District did not have formal written policies that address Uniform Grant Guidance requirements, such as: Determining the allowability of costs in accordance with federal cost principles and the terms and conditions of the federal award; and the mandatory disclosure of all violations of federal criminal law involving fraud, bribery, or gratuity violations potentially affecting the federal award.
It was noted during the review of purchase orders that a number of purchase orders greater than $25,000 were missing evidence of verification to ensure a vendor is not debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded from or ineligible for participation in federal assistance programs or activities.
It was noted the District did not have formal written policies that address Uniform Grant Guidance requirements, such as: Determining the allowability of costs in accordance with federal cost principles and the terms and conditions of the federal award; and the mandatory disclosure of all violations of federal criminal law involving fraud, bribery, or gratuity violations potentially affecting the federal award.
It was noted during the review of purchase orders that a number of purchase orders greater than $25,000 were missing evidence of verification to ensure a vendor is not debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded from or ineligible for participation in federal assistance programs or activities.
It was noted the District did not have formal written policies that address Uniform Grant Guidance requirements, such as: Determining the allowability of costs in accordance with federal cost principles and the terms and conditions of the federal award; and the mandatory disclosure of all violations of federal criminal law involving fraud, bribery, or gratuity violations potentially affecting the federal award.
It was noted during the review of purchase orders that a number of purchase orders greater than $25,000 were missing evidence of verification to ensure a vendor is not debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded from or ineligible for participation in federal assistance programs or activities.
It was noted the District did not have formal written policies that address Uniform Grant Guidance requirements, such as: Determining the allowability of costs in accordance with federal cost principles and the terms and conditions of the federal award; and the mandatory disclosure of all violations of federal criminal law involving fraud, bribery, or gratuity violations potentially affecting the federal award.
It was noted during the review of purchase orders that a number of purchase orders greater than $25,000 were missing evidence of verification to ensure a vendor is not debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded from or ineligible for participation in federal assistance programs or activities.
It was noted the District did not have formal written policies that address Uniform Grant Guidance requirements, such as: Determining the allowability of costs in accordance with federal cost principles and the terms and conditions of the federal award; and the mandatory disclosure of all violations of federal criminal law involving fraud, bribery, or gratuity violations potentially affecting the federal award.
It was noted during the review of purchase orders that a number of purchase orders greater than $25,000 were missing evidence of verification to ensure a vendor is not debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded from or ineligible for participation in federal assistance programs or activities.
It was noted the District did not have formal written policies that address Uniform Grant Guidance requirements, such as: Determining the allowability of costs in accordance with federal cost principles and the terms and conditions of the federal award; and the mandatory disclosure of all violations of federal criminal law involving fraud, bribery, or gratuity violations potentially affecting the federal award.
It was noted during the review of purchase orders that a number of purchase orders greater than $25,000 were missing evidence of verification to ensure a vendor is not debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded from or ineligible for participation in federal assistance programs or activities.
It was noted the District did not have formal written policies that address Uniform Grant Guidance requirements, such as: Determining the allowability of costs in accordance with federal cost principles and the terms and conditions of the federal award; and the mandatory disclosure of all violations of federal criminal law involving fraud, bribery, or gratuity violations potentially affecting the federal award.
It was noted during the review of purchase orders that a number of purchase orders greater than $25,000 were missing evidence of verification to ensure a vendor is not debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded from or ineligible for participation in federal assistance programs or activities.