Audit 326621

FY End
2024-06-30
Total Expended
$5.29M
Findings
2
Programs
6
Organization: Rocky Mountain Institute (CO)
Year: 2024 Accepted: 2024-10-30

Organization Exclusion Status:

Checking exclusion status...

Findings

ID Ref Severity Repeat Requirement
504175 2024-001 Significant Deficiency - I
1080617 2024-001 Significant Deficiency - I

Contacts

Name Title Type
LBGKDU73JMV5 Callie Ruh Auditee
3035878589 Karmyn Jeffries Auditor
No contacts on file

Notes to SEFA

Title: Notes to Schedule 1 Accounting Policies: Expenditures reported on the Schedule are reported on the accrual basis of accounting. Such expenditures are recognized following the cost principles contained in the Uniform Guidance, wherein certain types of expenditures are not allowable or are limited as to reimbursement. Negative amounts shown on the Schedule represent adjustments or credits made in the normal course of business to amounts reported as expenditures in prior years. De Minimis Rate Used: N Rate Explanation: RMI utilizes its own cost allocation methodology for indirect costs when allowable by the awarding agency. Otherwise, RMI utilizes the indirect cost rate as stipulated in the grant agreement with the respective awarding agency. The accompanying schedule of expenditures of federal awards (the Schedule) includes the federal award activity of Rocky Mountain Institute under programs of the federal government for the year ended June 30, 2024. The information in this Schedule is presented in accordance with the requirements of Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance). Because the Schedule presents only a selected portion of the operations of Rocky Mountain Institute, it is not intended to and does not present the financial position, changes in net assets or cash flows of Rocky Mountain Institute.
Title: Notes to Schedule 2 Accounting Policies: Expenditures reported on the Schedule are reported on the accrual basis of accounting. Such expenditures are recognized following the cost principles contained in the Uniform Guidance, wherein certain types of expenditures are not allowable or are limited as to reimbursement. Negative amounts shown on the Schedule represent adjustments or credits made in the normal course of business to amounts reported as expenditures in prior years. De Minimis Rate Used: N Rate Explanation: RMI utilizes its own cost allocation methodology for indirect costs when allowable by the awarding agency. Otherwise, RMI utilizes the indirect cost rate as stipulated in the grant agreement with the respective awarding agency. Expenditures reported on the Schedule are reported on the accrual basis of accounting. Such expenditures are recognized following the cost principles contained in the Uniform Guidance, wherein certain types of expenditures are not allowable or are limited as to reimbursement. Negative amounts shown on the Schedule represent adjustments or credits made in the normal course of business to amounts reported as expenditures in prior years. Rocky Mountain Institute has elected not to use the 10 percent de minimis indirect cost rate allowed under the Uniform Guidance.

Finding Details

Finding: Suspension and Debarment Research and Development Cluster Department of State Assistance Listing Number 19.017 Environmental and Scientific Partnership and Programs Award Number: SAQMIP23GR0057 Award Year 2024 Criteria or Specific Requirement: Per 2 CFR 180, all non-federal entities are prohibited from contracting with or making sub-awards under covered transactions with parties that are suspended or debarred or otherwise excluded from or ineligible for participation in federal assistance programs or activities. Condition: Documentation to support compliance with the above requirement was not available in one instance in which the Organization did not check the suspension and debarment via the excluded parties listing (EPLS) prior to entering into the contract. Questioned Costs: None. Context: We tested a sample of 3 of 26 vendors to evaluate compliance with the applicable procurement requirements, including the review of the excluded party list, and noted the above issue related to the Climate Finance Access Network. A non-statistical sampling methodology was used to select the sample. Effect: By not verifying vendors against the excluded party list, the Organization risks contracting with and making payments to a contractor/vendor that has been suspended or debarred in a violation of federal regulations. Cause: The Organization did not have controls in place to perform the suspension and debarment check prior to entering into a covered transaction. Recommendation: We recommend that the Organization update its current policies and procedures to ensure that the "Excluded Parties List" be reviewed prior to awarding a provider contract, purchase order or contract extension, and on an annual basis thereafter. Performance of such reviews should be documented by including supporting documentation in the contract file.
Finding: Suspension and Debarment Research and Development Cluster Department of State Assistance Listing Number 19.017 Environmental and Scientific Partnership and Programs Award Number: SAQMIP23GR0057 Award Year 2024 Criteria or Specific Requirement: Per 2 CFR 180, all non-federal entities are prohibited from contracting with or making sub-awards under covered transactions with parties that are suspended or debarred or otherwise excluded from or ineligible for participation in federal assistance programs or activities. Condition: Documentation to support compliance with the above requirement was not available in one instance in which the Organization did not check the suspension and debarment via the excluded parties listing (EPLS) prior to entering into the contract. Questioned Costs: None. Context: We tested a sample of 3 of 26 vendors to evaluate compliance with the applicable procurement requirements, including the review of the excluded party list, and noted the above issue related to the Climate Finance Access Network. A non-statistical sampling methodology was used to select the sample. Effect: By not verifying vendors against the excluded party list, the Organization risks contracting with and making payments to a contractor/vendor that has been suspended or debarred in a violation of federal regulations. Cause: The Organization did not have controls in place to perform the suspension and debarment check prior to entering into a covered transaction. Recommendation: We recommend that the Organization update its current policies and procedures to ensure that the "Excluded Parties List" be reviewed prior to awarding a provider contract, purchase order or contract extension, and on an annual basis thereafter. Performance of such reviews should be documented by including supporting documentation in the contract file.