Audit 32527

FY End
2022-12-31
Total Expended
$10.00M
Findings
6
Programs
23
Organization: Howard County (IN)
Year: 2022 Accepted: 2023-07-05

Organization Exclusion Status:

Checking exclusion status...

Findings

ID Ref Severity Repeat Requirement
38337 2022-001 Material Weakness - L
38338 2022-002 Significant Deficiency Yes I
38339 2022-003 Material Weakness - F
614779 2022-001 Material Weakness - L
614780 2022-002 Significant Deficiency Yes I
614781 2022-003 Material Weakness - F

Programs

ALN Program Spent Major Findings
21.027 Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds $8.29M Yes 3
93.563 Child Support Enforcement $812,007 Yes 0
14.228 Community Development Block Grants/state's Program and Non-Entitlement Grants in Hawaii $177,282 - 0
16.575 Crime Victim Assistance $130,608 - 0
20.205 Highway Planning and Construction $116,976 - 0
93.788 Opioid Str $81,727 - 0
97.042 Emergency Management Performance Grants $50,467 - 0
97.067 Homeland Security Grant Program $50,000 - 0
16.588 Violence Against Women Formula Grants $47,217 - 0
93.323 Epidemiology and Laboratory Capacity for Infectious Diseases (elc) $38,917 - 0
16.710 Public Safety Partnership and Community Policing Grants $33,451 - 0
10.555 National School Lunch Program $33,152 - 0
16.034 Coronavirus Emergency Supplemental Funding Program $28,329 - 0
97.047 Pre-Disaster Mitigation $19,564 - 0
93.069 Public Health Emergency Preparedness $17,913 - 0
10.553 School Breakfast Program $13,780 - 0
93.268 Immunization Cooperative Agreements $12,743 - 0
93.354 Public Health Emergency Response: Cooperative Agreement for Emergency Response: Public Health Crisis Response $11,959 - 0
93.946 Cooperative Agreements to Support State-Based Safe Motherhood and Infant Health Initiative Programs $10,000 - 0
20.600 State and Community Highway Safety $8,569 - 0
93.658 Foster Care_title IV-E $7,771 - 0
20.608 Minimum Penalties for Repeat Offenders for Driving While Intoxicated $5,014 - 0
20.616 National Priority Safety Programs $4,383 - 0

Contacts

Name Title Type
KGMAV8J3LUQ3 Jessica Secrease Auditee
7654562215 Beth Kelley Auditor
No contacts on file

Notes to SEFA

Accounting Policies: Note 1. Summary of Significant Accounting PoliciesA. Basis of PresentationThe accompanying Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (SEFA) includes the federalgrant activity of the County under programs of the federal government for the year endedDecember 31, 2022. The information in the SEFA is presented in accordance with therequirements of Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200, Uniform AdministrativeRequirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (UniformGuidance). Because the SEFA presents only a select portion of the operations of the County,it is not intended to and does not present the financial position of the County.B. Other Significant Accounting PoliciesExpenditures reported on the SEFA are reported on the cash basis of accounting. Suchexpenditures are recognized following, as applicable, either the cost principles in OMBCircular A-87, Cost Principles for State, Local, and Indian Tribal Governments, or the costprinciples contained in the Uniform Guidance, wherein certain types of expenditures are notallowed or are limited as to reimbursement. When federal grants are received on a reimbursementbasis, the federal awards are considered expended when the reimbursement isreceived. De Minimis Rate Used: N Rate Explanation: The auditee did not use the de minimis cost rate.

Finding Details

FINDING 2022-001 Subject: COVID-19 - Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds - Reporting Federal Agency: Department of the Treasury Federal Program: COVID-19 - Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds Assistance Listings Number: 21.027 Federal Award Number and Year (or Other Identifying Number): CY 2022 Compliance Requirement: Reporting Audit Finding: Material Weakness Condition and Context The County had not properly designed or implemented a system of internal controls, which would include appropriate segregation of duties that would likely be effective in preventing, or detecting and correcting, noncompliance. Recipients are required to submit quarterly or annually Project and Expenditure (P&E) reports to the U.S. Department of the Treasury (Treasury). The reporting periods, as well as the respective due dates are based upon type of recipient and its population, as well as the recipient's allocation amount. Information to be reported includes projects funded, expenditures, and contracts for the appropriate reporting period. The County was classified as a county with a population below 250,000 residents that was allocated more than $10 million in state and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds funding. As such, the initial P&E report, covering three calendar quarters from March 3, 2021 to December 31, 2021, was required to be submitted to the Treasury by January 31, 2022. The subsequent quarterly reports are to cover one calendar quarter and must be submitted to the Treasury by the last day of the month following the end of the period covered. The County submitted four P&E reports during the audit period; however, a single employee prepared and submitted each P&E report without a review or oversight process in place to prevent, or detect and correct, errors. The lack of internal controls was a systemic issue throughout the audit period. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." Cause A proper system of internal controls was not designed by management of the County, which would include segregation of key functions. Embedded within a properly designed and implemented internal control system should be internal controls consisting of policies and procedures. Policies reflect the County's management of what should be done to effect internal controls, and procedures should consist of actions that would implement these policies. Effect Without the proper design or implementation of the components of a system of internal controls, including policies and procedures that provide segregation of duties and additional oversight as needed, the internal control system cannot be capable of effectively preventing, or detecting and correcting, material noncompliance. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. Recommendation We recommended that management of the County design and implement a proper system of internal controls, including policies and procedures that would provide segregation of duties to ensure appropriate reviews, approvals, and oversight are taking place. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
FINDING 2022-002 Subject: COVID-19 - Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds - Procurement Federal Agency: Department of the Treasury Federal Program: COVID-19 - Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds Assistance Listings Number: 21.027 Federal Award Number and Year (or Other Identifying Number): CY 2022 Compliance Requirement: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Audit Findings: Significant Deficiency, Noncompliance Repeat Finding This is a repeat finding from the immediately prior audit report. The prior audit finding number was 2021-003. Condition and Context Nonfederal entities are required to maintain written standards of conduct covering conflicts of interest and governing actions of its employees engaged in the selection, award, and administration of contracts. As part of accepting the State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds (SLFRF) the County agreed to maintain a conflict-of-interest policy, which is applicable to all activities funded with the SLFRF award. The County addressed conflicts of interest in the County's Personnel Policies Handbook. However, it did not include standards of conduct covering conflicts of interest or how to govern the actions of its employees engaged in selection, award, and administration of contracts supported by federal awards. The lack of controls and noncompliance were systemic issues throughout the audit period. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.318(c)(1) states: "The non-Federal entity must maintain written standards of conduct covering conflicts of interest and governing the actions of its employees engaged in the selection, award and administration of contracts. No employee, officer, or agent may participate in the selection, award, or administration of a contract supported by a Federal award if he or she has a real or apparent conflict of interest. Such a conflict of interest would arise when the employee, officer, or agent, any member of his or her immediate family, his or her partner, or an organization which employs or is about to employ any of the parties indicated herein, has a financial or other interest in or a tangible personal benefit from a firm considered for a contract. The officers, employees, and agents of the non-Federal entity may neither solicit nor accept gratuities, favors, or anything of monetary value from contractors or parties to subcontracts. However, non-Federal entities may set standards for situations in which the financial interest is not substantial or the gift is an unsolicited item of nominal value. The standards of conduct must provide for disciplinary actions to be applied for violations of such standards by officers, employees, or agents of the non-Federal entity." Federal Register, Vol. 87, No.18, page 4400, states in part: ". . . as part of accepting the Award Terms and Conditions for SLFRF, each recipient agreed to maintain a conflict-of-interest policy consistent with 2 CFR 200.318(c) that is applicable to all activities funded with the SLFRF award. This award term requires recipients and subrecipients to report to Treasury or the pass-through agency, as appropriate, any potential conflict of interest related to the award funds per 2 CFR 200.112. . . ." Cause The system of internal controls as established by management of the County was not properly implemented to ensure that policies adequately addressed all required elements related to procurement. Effect Without the proper implementation of an effectively designed system of internal controls, the internal control system cannot be capable of effectively preventing, or detecting and correcting, material noncompliance. Noncompliance with the provisions of federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award could result in the loss of future federal funding to the County. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. Recommendation We recommended that management of the County establish a proper system of internal controls, including strengthening its policies and procedures to ensure its compliance with requirements related to procurement. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
FINDING 2022-003 Subject: COVID-19 - Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds - Equipment and Real Property Management Federal Agency: Department of the Treasury Federal Program: COVID-19 - Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds Assistance Listings Number: 21.027 Federal Award Number and Year (or Other Identifying Number): CY 2022 Compliance Requirement: Equipment and Real Property Management Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Noncompliance Condition and Context State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds (SLFRF) may be used to acquire real and personal property, supplies, and equipment. Equipment purchased with SLFRF funds requires management, among other things, to maintain property records, complete a physical inventory, safeguard against loss, and properly maintain the equipment. A property record or capital asset listing which would include a description of the property, a serial number or other identification number, the source of funding for the property (including the federal award identification number), who holds title, the acquisition date, cost of the property, percentage of federal participation in the project costs for the federal award under which the property was acquired, the location, and use and condition of the property is to be maintained for assets purchased. The County did not maintain adequate property records for assets purchased with SLFRF award funds. A population of 23 assets, totaling $812,524, paid from SLFRF funds during the audit period was identified. A sample of 5 assets, totaling $329, 394, were selected for testing. Of the 5 assets tested, 2 were not added to the property records and 3, while added to the property records, did not have the appropriate identifying information to show the assets were purchased with federal grant funds. Assets purchased with SLFRF award funds are to be used for the originally authorized purpose as long as needed for that purpose, during which time the County must not dispose of or encumber its title or other interests. If the real property is no longer needed for the originally authorized purpose instructions from the federal awarding agency that provide for one of three alternatives are required. The alternatives include retaining title after compensating the federal awarding agency, selling the property and compensating the federal awarding agency or transferring title to the federal awarding agency or to a third-party designated/approved by the federal awarding agency. During the audit period, the County had one disposal. The disposal was a building that was originally purchased with SLFRF grant funds in 2021 for $201,631. At the time of purchase, the County did not obtain the required appraisals, as such the purchase was considered a questioned cost in the prior audit. In 2022, the County had an agreement to sell the building to a non-profit organization for $200,000. However, the County did not adhere to the agreement, nor request instruction from the federal awarding agency. Instead, the County gave the building, without approval from the federal awarding agency, to the non-profit organization. As such, the County did not follow proper protocol for the disposition of real property. The lack of internal controls and noncompliance were systemic issues throughout the audit period. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.313 states in part: ". . . (d) Management requirements. Procedures for managing equipment (including replacement equipment), whether acquired in whole or in part under a Federal award, until disposition takes place will, as a minimum, meet the following requirements: (1) Property records must be maintained that include a description of the property, a serial number or other identification number, the source of funding for the property (including the FAIN), who holds title, the acquisition date, and cost of the property, percentage of Federal participation in the project costs for the Federal award under which the property was acquired, the location, use and condition of the property, and any ultimate disposition data including the date of disposal and sale price of the property. . . ." 2 CFR 200.311 states in part: ". . . (c) Disposition. When real property is no longer needed for the originally authorized purpose, the non-Federal entity must obtain disposition instructions from the Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity. The instructions must provide for one of the following alternatives: (1) Retain title after compensating the Federal awarding agency. The amount paid to the Federal awarding agency will be computed by applying the Federal awarding agency's percentage of participation in the cost of the original purchase (and costs of any improvements) to the fair market value of the property. However, in those situations where the non-Federal entity is disposing of real property acquired or improved with a Federal award and acquiring replacement real property under the same Federal award, the net proceeds from the disposition may be used as an offset to the cost of the replacement property. (2) Sell the property and compensate the Federal awarding agency. The amount due to the Federal awarding agency will be calculated by applying the Federal awarding agency's percentage of participation in the cost of the original purchase (and cost of any improvements) to the proceeds of the sale after deduction of any actual and reasonable selling and fixing-up expenses. If the Federal award has not been closed out, the net proceeds from sale may be offset against the original cost of the property. When the non-Federal entity is directed to sell property, sales procedures must be followed that provide for competition to the extent practicable and result in the highest possible return. (3) Transfer title to the Federal awarding agency or to a third party designated/approved by the Federal awarding agency. The non-Federal entity is entitled to be paid an amount calculated by applying the non-Federal entity's percentage of participation in the purchase of the real property (and cost of any improvements) to the current fair market value of the property." Cause A proper system of internal controls was not designed by management of the County. Embedded within a properly designed and implemented internal control system should be controls consisting of policies and procedures. Policies reflect the County's management of what should be done to effect internal controls, and procedures should consist of actions that would implement these policies. Effect Without the proper implementation of an effectively designed system of internal controls, the internal control system cannot be capable of effectively preventing, or detecting and correcting, material noncompliance. As a result, not all required elements of the property record were documented for assets acquired with SLFRF award funds, nor was an asset properly disposed of. Noncompliance with the provisions of federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award could result in the loss of future federal funding to the County. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. Recommendation We recommended that management of the County establish a proper system of internal controls and develop policies and procedures to ensure property records contain all required elements and that assets are properly disposed of. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
FINDING 2022-001 Subject: COVID-19 - Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds - Reporting Federal Agency: Department of the Treasury Federal Program: COVID-19 - Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds Assistance Listings Number: 21.027 Federal Award Number and Year (or Other Identifying Number): CY 2022 Compliance Requirement: Reporting Audit Finding: Material Weakness Condition and Context The County had not properly designed or implemented a system of internal controls, which would include appropriate segregation of duties that would likely be effective in preventing, or detecting and correcting, noncompliance. Recipients are required to submit quarterly or annually Project and Expenditure (P&E) reports to the U.S. Department of the Treasury (Treasury). The reporting periods, as well as the respective due dates are based upon type of recipient and its population, as well as the recipient's allocation amount. Information to be reported includes projects funded, expenditures, and contracts for the appropriate reporting period. The County was classified as a county with a population below 250,000 residents that was allocated more than $10 million in state and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds funding. As such, the initial P&E report, covering three calendar quarters from March 3, 2021 to December 31, 2021, was required to be submitted to the Treasury by January 31, 2022. The subsequent quarterly reports are to cover one calendar quarter and must be submitted to the Treasury by the last day of the month following the end of the period covered. The County submitted four P&E reports during the audit period; however, a single employee prepared and submitted each P&E report without a review or oversight process in place to prevent, or detect and correct, errors. The lack of internal controls was a systemic issue throughout the audit period. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." Cause A proper system of internal controls was not designed by management of the County, which would include segregation of key functions. Embedded within a properly designed and implemented internal control system should be internal controls consisting of policies and procedures. Policies reflect the County's management of what should be done to effect internal controls, and procedures should consist of actions that would implement these policies. Effect Without the proper design or implementation of the components of a system of internal controls, including policies and procedures that provide segregation of duties and additional oversight as needed, the internal control system cannot be capable of effectively preventing, or detecting and correcting, material noncompliance. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. Recommendation We recommended that management of the County design and implement a proper system of internal controls, including policies and procedures that would provide segregation of duties to ensure appropriate reviews, approvals, and oversight are taking place. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
FINDING 2022-002 Subject: COVID-19 - Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds - Procurement Federal Agency: Department of the Treasury Federal Program: COVID-19 - Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds Assistance Listings Number: 21.027 Federal Award Number and Year (or Other Identifying Number): CY 2022 Compliance Requirement: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Audit Findings: Significant Deficiency, Noncompliance Repeat Finding This is a repeat finding from the immediately prior audit report. The prior audit finding number was 2021-003. Condition and Context Nonfederal entities are required to maintain written standards of conduct covering conflicts of interest and governing actions of its employees engaged in the selection, award, and administration of contracts. As part of accepting the State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds (SLFRF) the County agreed to maintain a conflict-of-interest policy, which is applicable to all activities funded with the SLFRF award. The County addressed conflicts of interest in the County's Personnel Policies Handbook. However, it did not include standards of conduct covering conflicts of interest or how to govern the actions of its employees engaged in selection, award, and administration of contracts supported by federal awards. The lack of controls and noncompliance were systemic issues throughout the audit period. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.318(c)(1) states: "The non-Federal entity must maintain written standards of conduct covering conflicts of interest and governing the actions of its employees engaged in the selection, award and administration of contracts. No employee, officer, or agent may participate in the selection, award, or administration of a contract supported by a Federal award if he or she has a real or apparent conflict of interest. Such a conflict of interest would arise when the employee, officer, or agent, any member of his or her immediate family, his or her partner, or an organization which employs or is about to employ any of the parties indicated herein, has a financial or other interest in or a tangible personal benefit from a firm considered for a contract. The officers, employees, and agents of the non-Federal entity may neither solicit nor accept gratuities, favors, or anything of monetary value from contractors or parties to subcontracts. However, non-Federal entities may set standards for situations in which the financial interest is not substantial or the gift is an unsolicited item of nominal value. The standards of conduct must provide for disciplinary actions to be applied for violations of such standards by officers, employees, or agents of the non-Federal entity." Federal Register, Vol. 87, No.18, page 4400, states in part: ". . . as part of accepting the Award Terms and Conditions for SLFRF, each recipient agreed to maintain a conflict-of-interest policy consistent with 2 CFR 200.318(c) that is applicable to all activities funded with the SLFRF award. This award term requires recipients and subrecipients to report to Treasury or the pass-through agency, as appropriate, any potential conflict of interest related to the award funds per 2 CFR 200.112. . . ." Cause The system of internal controls as established by management of the County was not properly implemented to ensure that policies adequately addressed all required elements related to procurement. Effect Without the proper implementation of an effectively designed system of internal controls, the internal control system cannot be capable of effectively preventing, or detecting and correcting, material noncompliance. Noncompliance with the provisions of federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award could result in the loss of future federal funding to the County. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. Recommendation We recommended that management of the County establish a proper system of internal controls, including strengthening its policies and procedures to ensure its compliance with requirements related to procurement. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
FINDING 2022-003 Subject: COVID-19 - Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds - Equipment and Real Property Management Federal Agency: Department of the Treasury Federal Program: COVID-19 - Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds Assistance Listings Number: 21.027 Federal Award Number and Year (or Other Identifying Number): CY 2022 Compliance Requirement: Equipment and Real Property Management Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Noncompliance Condition and Context State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds (SLFRF) may be used to acquire real and personal property, supplies, and equipment. Equipment purchased with SLFRF funds requires management, among other things, to maintain property records, complete a physical inventory, safeguard against loss, and properly maintain the equipment. A property record or capital asset listing which would include a description of the property, a serial number or other identification number, the source of funding for the property (including the federal award identification number), who holds title, the acquisition date, cost of the property, percentage of federal participation in the project costs for the federal award under which the property was acquired, the location, and use and condition of the property is to be maintained for assets purchased. The County did not maintain adequate property records for assets purchased with SLFRF award funds. A population of 23 assets, totaling $812,524, paid from SLFRF funds during the audit period was identified. A sample of 5 assets, totaling $329, 394, were selected for testing. Of the 5 assets tested, 2 were not added to the property records and 3, while added to the property records, did not have the appropriate identifying information to show the assets were purchased with federal grant funds. Assets purchased with SLFRF award funds are to be used for the originally authorized purpose as long as needed for that purpose, during which time the County must not dispose of or encumber its title or other interests. If the real property is no longer needed for the originally authorized purpose instructions from the federal awarding agency that provide for one of three alternatives are required. The alternatives include retaining title after compensating the federal awarding agency, selling the property and compensating the federal awarding agency or transferring title to the federal awarding agency or to a third-party designated/approved by the federal awarding agency. During the audit period, the County had one disposal. The disposal was a building that was originally purchased with SLFRF grant funds in 2021 for $201,631. At the time of purchase, the County did not obtain the required appraisals, as such the purchase was considered a questioned cost in the prior audit. In 2022, the County had an agreement to sell the building to a non-profit organization for $200,000. However, the County did not adhere to the agreement, nor request instruction from the federal awarding agency. Instead, the County gave the building, without approval from the federal awarding agency, to the non-profit organization. As such, the County did not follow proper protocol for the disposition of real property. The lack of internal controls and noncompliance were systemic issues throughout the audit period. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.313 states in part: ". . . (d) Management requirements. Procedures for managing equipment (including replacement equipment), whether acquired in whole or in part under a Federal award, until disposition takes place will, as a minimum, meet the following requirements: (1) Property records must be maintained that include a description of the property, a serial number or other identification number, the source of funding for the property (including the FAIN), who holds title, the acquisition date, and cost of the property, percentage of Federal participation in the project costs for the Federal award under which the property was acquired, the location, use and condition of the property, and any ultimate disposition data including the date of disposal and sale price of the property. . . ." 2 CFR 200.311 states in part: ". . . (c) Disposition. When real property is no longer needed for the originally authorized purpose, the non-Federal entity must obtain disposition instructions from the Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity. The instructions must provide for one of the following alternatives: (1) Retain title after compensating the Federal awarding agency. The amount paid to the Federal awarding agency will be computed by applying the Federal awarding agency's percentage of participation in the cost of the original purchase (and costs of any improvements) to the fair market value of the property. However, in those situations where the non-Federal entity is disposing of real property acquired or improved with a Federal award and acquiring replacement real property under the same Federal award, the net proceeds from the disposition may be used as an offset to the cost of the replacement property. (2) Sell the property and compensate the Federal awarding agency. The amount due to the Federal awarding agency will be calculated by applying the Federal awarding agency's percentage of participation in the cost of the original purchase (and cost of any improvements) to the proceeds of the sale after deduction of any actual and reasonable selling and fixing-up expenses. If the Federal award has not been closed out, the net proceeds from sale may be offset against the original cost of the property. When the non-Federal entity is directed to sell property, sales procedures must be followed that provide for competition to the extent practicable and result in the highest possible return. (3) Transfer title to the Federal awarding agency or to a third party designated/approved by the Federal awarding agency. The non-Federal entity is entitled to be paid an amount calculated by applying the non-Federal entity's percentage of participation in the purchase of the real property (and cost of any improvements) to the current fair market value of the property." Cause A proper system of internal controls was not designed by management of the County. Embedded within a properly designed and implemented internal control system should be controls consisting of policies and procedures. Policies reflect the County's management of what should be done to effect internal controls, and procedures should consist of actions that would implement these policies. Effect Without the proper implementation of an effectively designed system of internal controls, the internal control system cannot be capable of effectively preventing, or detecting and correcting, material noncompliance. As a result, not all required elements of the property record were documented for assets acquired with SLFRF award funds, nor was an asset properly disposed of. Noncompliance with the provisions of federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award could result in the loss of future federal funding to the County. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. Recommendation We recommended that management of the County establish a proper system of internal controls and develop policies and procedures to ensure property records contain all required elements and that assets are properly disposed of. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.