2023-002 Activities Allowed or Unallowed and Allowable Costs/Cost Principles
Prior Year Finding Number: N/A
Year of Finding Origination: 2023
Type of Finding: Internal Control Over Compliance and Compliance
Severity of Deficiency: Material Weakness and Modified Opinion
Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Treasury
Program: 21.027 COVID-19 – Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds
Award Number and Year: SLFRP2192; 2021
Pass-Through Agency: N/A – Direct
Criteria: Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations § 200.303 states that the auditee must establish and maintain effective internal control over the federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the auditee is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award.
Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations §2 CFR 200.403(a) and §2 CFR 200.403(g) require costs to be necessary and reasonable, and be adequately documented.
Condition: The County did not obtain itemized documentation for five out of 22 disbursements tested. The amount of disbursements that did not have supporting documentation totaled $818,036.
Questioned Costs: $818,036
Context: The County disbursed funds to cities and towns as non-entitlement units of government (NEU), however; the NEU designation only applies to states providing funds to local governments.
The sample size was originally based on guidance from Chapter 11 of the AICPA Audit Guide, Government Auditing and Single Audits, but was expanded to include four additional payments identified by the County as payments to NEUs.
Effect: The County has insufficient documentation to demonstrate expenditures were for allowable activities and met the requirements of allowable costs.
Cause: The County believed funds could be disbursed to cities and towns as NEUs. Because of this determination, the County did not obtain itemized support for expenditures incurred.
Recommendation: We recommend Chisago County obtain itemized documentation related to grant expenditures to document expenditures were for allowable activities and met the requirements of allowable costs.
View of Responsible Official: Acknowledge
2023-003 Suspension and Debarment
Prior Year Finding Number: 2022-002
Year of Finding Origination: 2022
Type of Finding: Internal Control Over Compliance and Compliance
Severity of Deficiency: Material Weakness and Modified Opinion
Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Treasury
Program: 21.027 COVID-19 – Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds
Award Number and Year: SLFRP2192; 2021
Pass-Through Agency: N/A – Direct
Criteria: Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations § 200.303 states that the auditee must establish and maintain effective internal control over the federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the auditee is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award.
Federal requirements prohibit non-federal entities from contracting with or making subawards under covered transactions to parties that are suspended or debarred. Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations § 180.300 describes a required verification process. Prior to entering into the transaction, one of the following must be performed: (1) checking SAM.gov exclusions, (2) collecting a certification, or (3) adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction.
Condition: For six of the eight covered transactions selected for testing, the County did not perform the verification for suspended or debarred vendors prior to entering into the covered transactions.
Questioned Costs: None.
Context: There were 24 covered transactions during the year. The County provided funds to various cities, townships, and vendors which have operated for many years and were familiar to the County.
The sample size was based on guidance from Chapter 11 of the AICPA Audit Guide, Government Auditing Standards and Single Audits.
Effect: Failure to verify vendors are not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded prior to entering into a covered transaction may result in the County entering into a transaction with a vendor that is not authorized to provide goods and services under the grant.
Cause: The County informed us there is a lack of staff available to check the covered transactions for suspension and debarment.
Recommendation: We recommend the County maintain documentation to demonstrate that vendors were not debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded from conducting business with the County; this documentation should be completed prior to entering into a covered transaction.
View of Responsible Official: Acknowledge
2023-002 Activities Allowed or Unallowed and Allowable Costs/Cost Principles
Prior Year Finding Number: N/A
Year of Finding Origination: 2023
Type of Finding: Internal Control Over Compliance and Compliance
Severity of Deficiency: Material Weakness and Modified Opinion
Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Treasury
Program: 21.027 COVID-19 – Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds
Award Number and Year: SLFRP2192; 2021
Pass-Through Agency: N/A – Direct
Criteria: Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations § 200.303 states that the auditee must establish and maintain effective internal control over the federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the auditee is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award.
Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations §2 CFR 200.403(a) and §2 CFR 200.403(g) require costs to be necessary and reasonable, and be adequately documented.
Condition: The County did not obtain itemized documentation for five out of 22 disbursements tested. The amount of disbursements that did not have supporting documentation totaled $818,036.
Questioned Costs: $818,036
Context: The County disbursed funds to cities and towns as non-entitlement units of government (NEU), however; the NEU designation only applies to states providing funds to local governments.
The sample size was originally based on guidance from Chapter 11 of the AICPA Audit Guide, Government Auditing and Single Audits, but was expanded to include four additional payments identified by the County as payments to NEUs.
Effect: The County has insufficient documentation to demonstrate expenditures were for allowable activities and met the requirements of allowable costs.
Cause: The County believed funds could be disbursed to cities and towns as NEUs. Because of this determination, the County did not obtain itemized support for expenditures incurred.
Recommendation: We recommend Chisago County obtain itemized documentation related to grant expenditures to document expenditures were for allowable activities and met the requirements of allowable costs.
View of Responsible Official: Acknowledge
2023-003 Suspension and Debarment
Prior Year Finding Number: 2022-002
Year of Finding Origination: 2022
Type of Finding: Internal Control Over Compliance and Compliance
Severity of Deficiency: Material Weakness and Modified Opinion
Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Treasury
Program: 21.027 COVID-19 – Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds
Award Number and Year: SLFRP2192; 2021
Pass-Through Agency: N/A – Direct
Criteria: Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations § 200.303 states that the auditee must establish and maintain effective internal control over the federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the auditee is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award.
Federal requirements prohibit non-federal entities from contracting with or making subawards under covered transactions to parties that are suspended or debarred. Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations § 180.300 describes a required verification process. Prior to entering into the transaction, one of the following must be performed: (1) checking SAM.gov exclusions, (2) collecting a certification, or (3) adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction.
Condition: For six of the eight covered transactions selected for testing, the County did not perform the verification for suspended or debarred vendors prior to entering into the covered transactions.
Questioned Costs: None.
Context: There were 24 covered transactions during the year. The County provided funds to various cities, townships, and vendors which have operated for many years and were familiar to the County.
The sample size was based on guidance from Chapter 11 of the AICPA Audit Guide, Government Auditing Standards and Single Audits.
Effect: Failure to verify vendors are not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded prior to entering into a covered transaction may result in the County entering into a transaction with a vendor that is not authorized to provide goods and services under the grant.
Cause: The County informed us there is a lack of staff available to check the covered transactions for suspension and debarment.
Recommendation: We recommend the County maintain documentation to demonstrate that vendors were not debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded from conducting business with the County; this documentation should be completed prior to entering into a covered transaction.
View of Responsible Official: Acknowledge