Audit 320073

FY End
2021-06-30
Total Expended
$1.75M
Findings
6
Programs
5
Year: 2021 Accepted: 2024-09-19
Auditor: Ata PLLC

Organization Exclusion Status:

Checking exclusion status...

Findings

ID Ref Severity Repeat Requirement
497349 2021-002 Significant Deficiency - A
497350 2021-003 Significant Deficiency - B
497351 2021-004 - Yes L
1073791 2021-002 Significant Deficiency - A
1073792 2021-003 Significant Deficiency - B
1073793 2021-004 - Yes L

Programs

ALN Program Spent Major Findings
17.259 Wioa Youth Activities $572,909 Yes 0
17.258 Wioa Adult Program $518,144 Yes 3
93.558 Temporary Assistance for Needy Families $270,891 - 0
17.278 Wioa Dislocated Worker Formula Grants $221,998 Yes 0
10.561 State Administrative Matching Grants for the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program $170,450 - 0

Contacts

Name Title Type
DEB9JPJ5JXW9 Frances Tribble-Adams Auditee
8707330601 Courtney Moore Auditor
No contacts on file

Notes to SEFA

Title: Note 1 - Summary of significant accounting policies Accounting Policies: Expenditures are reported on the accrual basis of accounting. Such expenditures are recognized following the cost principles contained in the Uniform Guidance, wherein certain types of expenditures are not allowable or are limited as to reimbursement. De Minimis Rate Used: N Rate Explanation: The board has elected to not use the 10% de minimus indirect cost rate as allowed under the Uniform Guidance. Expendiutres are reported on the schedule are reported on the accrual basis of accounting. Such expenditures are recognized following the cost principles contained in the Uniform Guidance, wherein certain types of expenditures are not allowable or are limited as to reimbursement.
Title: Note 2 - Basis of Accounting Accounting Policies: Expenditures are reported on the accrual basis of accounting. Such expenditures are recognized following the cost principles contained in the Uniform Guidance, wherein certain types of expenditures are not allowable or are limited as to reimbursement. De Minimis Rate Used: N Rate Explanation: The board has elected to not use the 10% de minimus indirect cost rate as allowed under the Uniform Guidance. The accompanying schedule of expenditures of federal awards includes the federal grant activities of the board and are presented on the accrual basis of accounting. The inofrmation in the schedules is presented in accordance with the requirements of Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principoles, and AuditRequirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance). Because the schedule only presents a selected portion of the operations of the Board, they do not and are not intended to present the financial position, changes in net assets, or cash flows.
Title: Note 3 - Federal Indirect Rate Accounting Policies: Expenditures are reported on the accrual basis of accounting. Such expenditures are recognized following the cost principles contained in the Uniform Guidance, wherein certain types of expenditures are not allowable or are limited as to reimbursement. De Minimis Rate Used: N Rate Explanation: The board has elected to not use the 10% de minimus indirect cost rate as allowed under the Uniform Guidance. The Board has elected not to use the 10% de minimus indirect cost rate as allowed under the Uniform Guidance.

Finding Details

Auditee has improperly tracked grant awards and expenditures. Federal Programs Impacted: 17,258 (WIOA Cluster). Questioned Costs: None. Condition: The WDBEA expended more than $750,000 in federal awards, triggering a single audit requirement. However, when asked to provide a schedule of expenditures of federal awards, client gave different amounts of revenues and expenditures than those provided through external confirmation by oversight agencies. Criteria: 2 CFR Section 200.329 states that it is the auditee's responsibility to monitor their activities for which federal awards are used. Cause: Unallowable costs among other items were included in the client's schedule of expenditures of federal awards. In addition, the books kept by the former finance manager were inadequate to properly track grant awards and expenditures. Effect: Difficulty in ascertaining the true balances of federal revenues and expenditures as reported on the schedule of expenditures of federal awards. Recommendation: We recommend the WDBEA maintains an effort to properly track and report federal awards and expenditures. Management Response: Managmeent will develop procedures which adequately address shortcomings of grant tracking and further solidify the processes for tracking and reporting of grant funds.
Internal control failtures including two employee timesheets being unreviewed by agreed-upon personnel. Federal Programs Impacted: 17.258 (WIOA Cluster) Questioned Costs: None. Condition: Per the auditee's internal control procedures, employee timesheets are to be signed off on by one of the individual listed above. However, we noted two exceptions throughout all procedures applied. Criteria: 2 CFR Section 200.329 states that it is the auditee's responsibility to monitor their activities for which federal awards are used. A component of this is to develop effective internal controls to ensure compliance with relevant compliance requirements. Cause: Internal control procedures failed, and management missed two timesheets for which review was needed. Effect: Disallowed costs related to payroll could have been charged to federal awards. Recommendation: We recommend management ensure all internal control procedures are being followed as outlined. Management Response: Management agrees with this finding and will ensure internal controls are followed as outlined.
Singleaudit data collection form not filed by due date. Federal Programs Impacted: 17.258 (WIOA Cluster). Questioned CostsL None. Condition: The data collection form for the single audit ended June 30, 2021 was not submitted to the Federal Audit Clearinghouse by the due date. Criteria: 2 CFR Section 200.512(b) provides for a form, referred to as the data collection form, to be prepared at the completio of each audit and submitted by the auditee to the Federal Audit Clearinghouse the earlier of 30 calendar days after reciept of the auditor's reports or nine months after the end of the audit period. Cause: The audit report was not completed by the nine month due date. This is due to bank reonciliation not reconciling appropriately in addition to auditor timelines impacting the ability to complete the audit. Effect: The WDBEA has not met the reporting requirements related to timely submission of the data collection form required for a single audit. Therefore, per 2 CFR Section 200.520, the WDBEA will not meet the low-risk criteria for future single audits that require submission of the data collection form and reporting package by the due date for each of the two preceding audit years. Recommendation: We recommend the WDBEA to continue its efforts in bringing audits up to date. Management Reponse: Management will continue its efforts incompleting audits in a timely and efficient manner.
Auditee has improperly tracked grant awards and expenditures. Federal Programs Impacted: 17,258 (WIOA Cluster). Questioned Costs: None. Condition: The WDBEA expended more than $750,000 in federal awards, triggering a single audit requirement. However, when asked to provide a schedule of expenditures of federal awards, client gave different amounts of revenues and expenditures than those provided through external confirmation by oversight agencies. Criteria: 2 CFR Section 200.329 states that it is the auditee's responsibility to monitor their activities for which federal awards are used. Cause: Unallowable costs among other items were included in the client's schedule of expenditures of federal awards. In addition, the books kept by the former finance manager were inadequate to properly track grant awards and expenditures. Effect: Difficulty in ascertaining the true balances of federal revenues and expenditures as reported on the schedule of expenditures of federal awards. Recommendation: We recommend the WDBEA maintains an effort to properly track and report federal awards and expenditures. Management Response: Managmeent will develop procedures which adequately address shortcomings of grant tracking and further solidify the processes for tracking and reporting of grant funds.
Internal control failtures including two employee timesheets being unreviewed by agreed-upon personnel. Federal Programs Impacted: 17.258 (WIOA Cluster) Questioned Costs: None. Condition: Per the auditee's internal control procedures, employee timesheets are to be signed off on by one of the individual listed above. However, we noted two exceptions throughout all procedures applied. Criteria: 2 CFR Section 200.329 states that it is the auditee's responsibility to monitor their activities for which federal awards are used. A component of this is to develop effective internal controls to ensure compliance with relevant compliance requirements. Cause: Internal control procedures failed, and management missed two timesheets for which review was needed. Effect: Disallowed costs related to payroll could have been charged to federal awards. Recommendation: We recommend management ensure all internal control procedures are being followed as outlined. Management Response: Management agrees with this finding and will ensure internal controls are followed as outlined.
Singleaudit data collection form not filed by due date. Federal Programs Impacted: 17.258 (WIOA Cluster). Questioned CostsL None. Condition: The data collection form for the single audit ended June 30, 2021 was not submitted to the Federal Audit Clearinghouse by the due date. Criteria: 2 CFR Section 200.512(b) provides for a form, referred to as the data collection form, to be prepared at the completio of each audit and submitted by the auditee to the Federal Audit Clearinghouse the earlier of 30 calendar days after reciept of the auditor's reports or nine months after the end of the audit period. Cause: The audit report was not completed by the nine month due date. This is due to bank reonciliation not reconciling appropriately in addition to auditor timelines impacting the ability to complete the audit. Effect: The WDBEA has not met the reporting requirements related to timely submission of the data collection form required for a single audit. Therefore, per 2 CFR Section 200.520, the WDBEA will not meet the low-risk criteria for future single audits that require submission of the data collection form and reporting package by the due date for each of the two preceding audit years. Recommendation: We recommend the WDBEA to continue its efforts in bringing audits up to date. Management Reponse: Management will continue its efforts incompleting audits in a timely and efficient manner.