Audit 318038

FY End
2024-02-29
Total Expended
$1.37M
Findings
6
Programs
2
Organization: Village of Kingsley (MI)
Year: 2024 Accepted: 2024-08-28
Auditor: Uhy LLP

Organization Exclusion Status:

Checking exclusion status...

Findings

ID Ref Severity Repeat Requirement
485274 2024-005 - - B
485275 2024-006 Material Weakness - I
485276 2024-007 - - L
1061716 2024-005 - - B
1061717 2024-006 Material Weakness - I
1061718 2024-007 - - L

Programs

ALN Program Spent Major Findings
21.027 Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds $1.11M Yes 3
20.205 Highway Planning and Construction $261,970 - 0

Contacts

Name Title Type
CXELRL2YSC96 Deb Nickerson Auditee
2312637778 Angela Kopriva Auditor
No contacts on file

Notes to SEFA

Title: Basis of Presentation Accounting Policies: See Additional Notes tab for significant policies used in preparing the SEFA De Minimis Rate Used: N Rate Explanation: The Village did not charge any indirect costs The accompanying schedule of expenditures of federal awards (the “Schedule”) includes the federal grant activity of Village of Kingsley (the "Village") for the year ended February 29, 2024. The information in this Schedule is presented in accordance with the requirements of Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance). Because the Schedule presents only a selected portion of the operations of the Village, it is not intended to, and does not, present the financial position, changes in net position, or cash flows of the Village.
Title: Summary of Significant Accounting Policies Accounting Policies: See Additional Notes tab for significant policies used in preparing the SEFA De Minimis Rate Used: N Rate Explanation: The Village did not charge any indirect costs Expenditures reported on the Schedule are reported on the accrual basis of accounting. Such expenditures reported on the schedule are recognized following the cost principles contained in Subpart E of the Uniform Guidance, wherein certain types of expenditures are not allowable or are limited as to reimbursement. For purposes of charging indirect costs to federal awards, the Village has not elected to use the 10% de minimis cost rate. The Village does not pass through federal funds to sub recipients.
Title: Reconciliation of Revenues with Expenditures for Federal Financial Assistance Programs Accounting Policies: See Additional Notes tab for significant policies used in preparing the SEFA De Minimis Rate Used: N Rate Explanation: The Village did not charge any indirect costs See the Notes to the SEFA table instead

Finding Details

2024-005 Written Policies Required by the Uniform Grant Guidance Program Title: Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds Assistance Listing Number: 21.027 Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Treasury Federal Award Number: N/A Federal Award Year: Fiscal year 2024 Pass-Through Entities: Michigan Department of Environment, Great Lakes, and Energy (EGLE) and Grand Traverse County Type of Compliance: Immaterial noncompliance Criteria: The Uniform Guidance requires a non-federal entity that has expended federal awards for a grant awarded to have written policies pertaining to allowability of costs, payments, and compensation charged to federal programs (§200.302(7)). Condition: A formal written policy covering allowable costs, conflict of interest and procurement has not been updated in accordance with the Uniform Guidance. Cause: This condition appears to be the result of a time lag in identifying the requirement and developing a plan for compliance. Effect: The lack of written policies could result in costs or transactions that would be nonallowable for a federal program. Questioned Costs: None Perspective Information: The finding appears to be an isolated instance. No sampling was necessary to determine this finding. Identification of Repeat Findings: None Recommendations: The Village Council should, as soon as possible, adopt written policies, as required by Uniform Guidance, for allowable costs, conflict of interest and procurement. Views of Responsible Officials: The Village does not believe that there were any actual nonallowable costs or transactions because of the lack of written policies as required by Uniform Guidance. However, corrective action will be done whereby the written policies will be prepared and adopted for the future.
2024-006 Suspension and Debarment Program Title: Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds Assistance Listing Number: 21.027 Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Treasury Federal Award Number: N/A Federal Award Year: Fiscal year 2024 Pass-Through Entities: Michigan Department of Environment, Great Lakes, and Energy (EGLE) and Grand Traverse County Type of Compliance: Material weakness and material noncompliance Criteria: Per 2 CRF Section 180.300, recipients must have procedures in place for verifying that an entity with which they plan to enter into a covered transaction is not debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded. Condition: The Village had no control procedures in place for ensuring contractors performing work on federal projects were not suspended or debarred. Cause: There were no controls in place to ensure vendors are not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded. Effect: The Village risks entering into contracts with excluded parties, which would be considered noncompliance with the Uniform Guidance. Questioned Costs: None. Although there was no verification that the contractors were not suspended or debarred prior to the audit, a subsequent check was performed to verify the vendor was not suspended or debarred. Perspective Information: The finding appears to be an isolated instance. No sampling was necessary to determine this finding. Identification of Repeat Findings: None Recommendations: The Village Council should, as soon as possible, update its policies to include controls for verifying contractors are not suspended or debarred. Although this is a requirement only for contracts involving the use of federal funds, the Village may want to update its policies over all procurements, not just those related to federally funded projects. Views of Responsible Officials: The Village’s engineer, Wade Trim, has searched the state procurement office webpage to check if any vendor for a federal project is on the debarment list, which they are not. In the future, as part of Federal Grant Funding implementation, the Village will ensure that vendors are not debarred or suspended from federal funding awards, whether they check the list themselves or have the engineer do it as part of the bidding process.
2024-007 Reporting Program Title: Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds Assistance Listing Number: 21.027 Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Treasury Federal Award Number: N/A Federal Award Year: Fiscal year 2024 Pass-Through Entities: Michigan Department of Environment, Great Lakes, and Energy (EGLE) and Grand Traverse County Type of Compliance: Immaterial noncompliance Criteria: Per 31 CFR Section 35 an accurate and complete Project and Expenditure Report is due 30 days after the close of the reporting period. Condition: The Village did not have adequate controls in place to submit the annual Project and Expenditure Report for the reporting period ended March 31, 2024, within 30 days of the close of the reporting period. The Village also did not complete the report accurately, as the contractor was listed as a subrecipient, which is incorrect, and the incorrect project start date was listed on the report. Cause: The previous Village Clerk was the one who has filed the report in the past, who is no longer employed at the Village. The filing deadline did not come to the Village’s attention until close to the reporting deadline, which at the time, the Village did not have the appropriate login information to sam.gov to be able to file the report. The Village also had a misunderstanding of what the definition of a subrecipient was and the incorrect project start date was a typo. Effect: The Village did not submit the annual Project and Expenditure Report timely or accurately. Questioned Costs: None. The report was filed as soon as the Village was able to get accurate login information to sam.gov. Perspective Information: The finding appears to be an isolated instance. No sampling was necessary to determine this finding. Identification of Repeat Findings: None Recommendations: The Village should build a timeline for preparation and completion of the annual Project and Expenditure Report to ensure timely filing. We also urge the Village to review the report carefully in the future and get a complete understanding of how to file the report to avoid any mistakes in the future. Views of Responsible Officials: The Village is now aware of the reporting deadlines. It was also brought to the attention of the Village the inaccuracies in the report. Now that the Village has the proper login information and understanding of how to accurately complete the annual Project and Expenditure Report, they will ensure it gets filed timely and accurately in the future.
2024-005 Written Policies Required by the Uniform Grant Guidance Program Title: Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds Assistance Listing Number: 21.027 Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Treasury Federal Award Number: N/A Federal Award Year: Fiscal year 2024 Pass-Through Entities: Michigan Department of Environment, Great Lakes, and Energy (EGLE) and Grand Traverse County Type of Compliance: Immaterial noncompliance Criteria: The Uniform Guidance requires a non-federal entity that has expended federal awards for a grant awarded to have written policies pertaining to allowability of costs, payments, and compensation charged to federal programs (§200.302(7)). Condition: A formal written policy covering allowable costs, conflict of interest and procurement has not been updated in accordance with the Uniform Guidance. Cause: This condition appears to be the result of a time lag in identifying the requirement and developing a plan for compliance. Effect: The lack of written policies could result in costs or transactions that would be nonallowable for a federal program. Questioned Costs: None Perspective Information: The finding appears to be an isolated instance. No sampling was necessary to determine this finding. Identification of Repeat Findings: None Recommendations: The Village Council should, as soon as possible, adopt written policies, as required by Uniform Guidance, for allowable costs, conflict of interest and procurement. Views of Responsible Officials: The Village does not believe that there were any actual nonallowable costs or transactions because of the lack of written policies as required by Uniform Guidance. However, corrective action will be done whereby the written policies will be prepared and adopted for the future.
2024-006 Suspension and Debarment Program Title: Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds Assistance Listing Number: 21.027 Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Treasury Federal Award Number: N/A Federal Award Year: Fiscal year 2024 Pass-Through Entities: Michigan Department of Environment, Great Lakes, and Energy (EGLE) and Grand Traverse County Type of Compliance: Material weakness and material noncompliance Criteria: Per 2 CRF Section 180.300, recipients must have procedures in place for verifying that an entity with which they plan to enter into a covered transaction is not debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded. Condition: The Village had no control procedures in place for ensuring contractors performing work on federal projects were not suspended or debarred. Cause: There were no controls in place to ensure vendors are not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded. Effect: The Village risks entering into contracts with excluded parties, which would be considered noncompliance with the Uniform Guidance. Questioned Costs: None. Although there was no verification that the contractors were not suspended or debarred prior to the audit, a subsequent check was performed to verify the vendor was not suspended or debarred. Perspective Information: The finding appears to be an isolated instance. No sampling was necessary to determine this finding. Identification of Repeat Findings: None Recommendations: The Village Council should, as soon as possible, update its policies to include controls for verifying contractors are not suspended or debarred. Although this is a requirement only for contracts involving the use of federal funds, the Village may want to update its policies over all procurements, not just those related to federally funded projects. Views of Responsible Officials: The Village’s engineer, Wade Trim, has searched the state procurement office webpage to check if any vendor for a federal project is on the debarment list, which they are not. In the future, as part of Federal Grant Funding implementation, the Village will ensure that vendors are not debarred or suspended from federal funding awards, whether they check the list themselves or have the engineer do it as part of the bidding process.
2024-007 Reporting Program Title: Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds Assistance Listing Number: 21.027 Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Treasury Federal Award Number: N/A Federal Award Year: Fiscal year 2024 Pass-Through Entities: Michigan Department of Environment, Great Lakes, and Energy (EGLE) and Grand Traverse County Type of Compliance: Immaterial noncompliance Criteria: Per 31 CFR Section 35 an accurate and complete Project and Expenditure Report is due 30 days after the close of the reporting period. Condition: The Village did not have adequate controls in place to submit the annual Project and Expenditure Report for the reporting period ended March 31, 2024, within 30 days of the close of the reporting period. The Village also did not complete the report accurately, as the contractor was listed as a subrecipient, which is incorrect, and the incorrect project start date was listed on the report. Cause: The previous Village Clerk was the one who has filed the report in the past, who is no longer employed at the Village. The filing deadline did not come to the Village’s attention until close to the reporting deadline, which at the time, the Village did not have the appropriate login information to sam.gov to be able to file the report. The Village also had a misunderstanding of what the definition of a subrecipient was and the incorrect project start date was a typo. Effect: The Village did not submit the annual Project and Expenditure Report timely or accurately. Questioned Costs: None. The report was filed as soon as the Village was able to get accurate login information to sam.gov. Perspective Information: The finding appears to be an isolated instance. No sampling was necessary to determine this finding. Identification of Repeat Findings: None Recommendations: The Village should build a timeline for preparation and completion of the annual Project and Expenditure Report to ensure timely filing. We also urge the Village to review the report carefully in the future and get a complete understanding of how to file the report to avoid any mistakes in the future. Views of Responsible Officials: The Village is now aware of the reporting deadlines. It was also brought to the attention of the Village the inaccuracies in the report. Now that the Village has the proper login information and understanding of how to accurately complete the annual Project and Expenditure Report, they will ensure it gets filed timely and accurately in the future.