Audit 317623

FY End
2023-09-30
Total Expended
$4.94M
Findings
28
Programs
5
Year: 2023 Accepted: 2024-08-21

Organization Exclusion Status:

Checking exclusion status...

Findings

ID Ref Severity Repeat Requirement
484717 2023-008 Material Weakness Yes N
484718 2023-009 Material Weakness Yes N
484719 2023-010 Material Weakness Yes N
484720 2023-011 Material Weakness Yes N
484721 2023-012 Material Weakness Yes N
484722 2023-013 Significant Deficiency Yes I
484723 2023-014 Significant Deficiency Yes I
484724 2023-015 Material Weakness Yes A
484725 2023-016 Material Weakness Yes N
484726 2023-017 Significant Deficiency Yes N
484727 2023-018 Material Weakness Yes B
484728 2023-019 Material Weakness Yes N
484729 2023-020 Significant Deficiency Yes N
484730 2023-021 Significant Deficiency Yes N
1061159 2023-008 Material Weakness Yes N
1061160 2023-009 Material Weakness Yes N
1061161 2023-010 Material Weakness Yes N
1061162 2023-011 Material Weakness Yes N
1061163 2023-012 Material Weakness Yes N
1061164 2023-013 Significant Deficiency Yes I
1061165 2023-014 Significant Deficiency Yes I
1061166 2023-015 Material Weakness Yes A
1061167 2023-016 Material Weakness Yes N
1061168 2023-017 Significant Deficiency Yes N
1061169 2023-018 Material Weakness Yes B
1061170 2023-019 Material Weakness Yes N
1061171 2023-020 Significant Deficiency Yes N
1061172 2023-021 Significant Deficiency Yes N

Programs

ALN Program Spent Major Findings
14.871 Section 8 Housing Choice Vouchers $3.80M Yes 0
14.850 Public and Indian Housing $799,148 Yes 11
14.871 Emergency Housing Vouchers $264,038 Yes 0
14.879 Mainstream Vouchers $56,695 Yes 0
14.872 Public Housing Capital Fund $19,880 Yes 3

Contacts

Name Title Type
H2X6UC5FSCT5 Chonda Tapley Auditee
4795213850 Louis Barrale Auditor
No contacts on file

Notes to SEFA

Title: Basis of Presentation Accounting Policies: NOTE 1 - Basis of Presentation The Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (the Schedule) presents the activity of all Federal award programs of the Authority. All Federal awards received directly from Federal agencies as well as Federal awards passed through other governmental agencies or other entities are included in the Schedule. The information in this Schedule is presented in accordance with the requirements of Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 200. Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance) Because the Schedule presents only a select position, changes in net position or cash flows of the Authority. NOTE 2 - Significant Accounting Policies The Authority’s Schedule of Federal Awards has been prepared on the accrual basis of accounting. Grant revenue is recognized on the modified accrual bases and, when all applicable eligibility requirements are met in accordance with the cost principles contained in the Uniform Guidance, wherein certain types of expenditures are not allowable or are limited as to reimbursement. The criteria established by GASB for accrual-bases recognition require that all eligibility requirements must be met, and the revenues must be available. “Available” means that the government has collected the revenues in the current period or expects to collect them soon enough after the end of the period to use them to pay liabilities of the current period. Resources received or recognized as receivables before the time requirements are met are reported as deferred revenues. The Authority has elected not to use the 10-percent de minims indirect cost rate allowed under the Uniform Guidance. NOTE 3 - Contingencies In connection with various Federal grant programs the Authority is obligated to administer related programs and spend the funds in accordance with regulatory restrictions and is subject to audit by grantor agencies and other auditors. In cases of noncompliance, the agencies involved may require the Authority to refund program funds. De Minimis Rate Used: N Rate Explanation: The Housing Authority has elected not to use the 10-percent de minims indirect cost rate allowed under the Uniform Guidance. The Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (the Schedule) presents the activity of all Federal award programs of the Authority. All Federal awards received directly from Federal agencies as well as Federal awards passed through other governmental agencies or other entities are included in the Schedule. The information in this Schedule is presented in accordance with the requirements of Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 200. Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance) Because the Schedule presents only a select position, changes in net position or cash flows of the Authority.
Title: Significant Accounting Policies Accounting Policies: NOTE 1 - Basis of Presentation The Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (the Schedule) presents the activity of all Federal award programs of the Authority. All Federal awards received directly from Federal agencies as well as Federal awards passed through other governmental agencies or other entities are included in the Schedule. The information in this Schedule is presented in accordance with the requirements of Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 200. Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance) Because the Schedule presents only a select position, changes in net position or cash flows of the Authority. NOTE 2 - Significant Accounting Policies The Authority’s Schedule of Federal Awards has been prepared on the accrual basis of accounting. Grant revenue is recognized on the modified accrual bases and, when all applicable eligibility requirements are met in accordance with the cost principles contained in the Uniform Guidance, wherein certain types of expenditures are not allowable or are limited as to reimbursement. The criteria established by GASB for accrual-bases recognition require that all eligibility requirements must be met, and the revenues must be available. “Available” means that the government has collected the revenues in the current period or expects to collect them soon enough after the end of the period to use them to pay liabilities of the current period. Resources received or recognized as receivables before the time requirements are met are reported as deferred revenues. The Authority has elected not to use the 10-percent de minims indirect cost rate allowed under the Uniform Guidance. NOTE 3 - Contingencies In connection with various Federal grant programs the Authority is obligated to administer related programs and spend the funds in accordance with regulatory restrictions and is subject to audit by grantor agencies and other auditors. In cases of noncompliance, the agencies involved may require the Authority to refund program funds. De Minimis Rate Used: N Rate Explanation: The Housing Authority has elected not to use the 10-percent de minims indirect cost rate allowed under the Uniform Guidance. The Authority’s Schedule of Federal Awards has been prepared on the accrual basis of accounting. Grant revenue is recognized on the modified accrual bases and, when all applicable eligibility requirements are met in accordance with the cost principles contained in the Uniform Guidance, wherein certain types of expenditures are not allowable or are limited as to reimbursement. The criteria established by GASB for accrual-bases recognition require that all eligibility requirements must be met, and the revenues must be available. “Available” means that the government has collected the revenues in the current period or expects to collect them soon enough after the end of the period to use them to pay liabilities of the current period. Resources received or recognized as receivables before the time requirements are met are reported as deferred revenues. The Authority has elected not to use the 10-percent de minims indirect cost rate allowed under the Uniform Guidance.
Title: Contingencies Accounting Policies: NOTE 1 - Basis of Presentation The Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (the Schedule) presents the activity of all Federal award programs of the Authority. All Federal awards received directly from Federal agencies as well as Federal awards passed through other governmental agencies or other entities are included in the Schedule. The information in this Schedule is presented in accordance with the requirements of Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 200. Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance) Because the Schedule presents only a select position, changes in net position or cash flows of the Authority. NOTE 2 - Significant Accounting Policies The Authority’s Schedule of Federal Awards has been prepared on the accrual basis of accounting. Grant revenue is recognized on the modified accrual bases and, when all applicable eligibility requirements are met in accordance with the cost principles contained in the Uniform Guidance, wherein certain types of expenditures are not allowable or are limited as to reimbursement. The criteria established by GASB for accrual-bases recognition require that all eligibility requirements must be met, and the revenues must be available. “Available” means that the government has collected the revenues in the current period or expects to collect them soon enough after the end of the period to use them to pay liabilities of the current period. Resources received or recognized as receivables before the time requirements are met are reported as deferred revenues. The Authority has elected not to use the 10-percent de minims indirect cost rate allowed under the Uniform Guidance. NOTE 3 - Contingencies In connection with various Federal grant programs the Authority is obligated to administer related programs and spend the funds in accordance with regulatory restrictions and is subject to audit by grantor agencies and other auditors. In cases of noncompliance, the agencies involved may require the Authority to refund program funds. De Minimis Rate Used: N Rate Explanation: The Housing Authority has elected not to use the 10-percent de minims indirect cost rate allowed under the Uniform Guidance. In connection with various Federal grant programs the Authority is obligated to administer related programs and spend the funds in accordance with regulatory restrictions and is subject to audit by grantor agencies and other auditors. In cases of noncompliance, the agencies involved may require the Authority to refund program funds

Finding Details

2022-008 Tenant Files - Annual Certifications Were Not Done Federal Awards: 14-850 Public and Indian Housing Low Rent Program 14-870 Housing Choice Voucher Criteria: Under the terms of the Public Housing Occupancy Guide - Complete the reexamination within a year (12 months) of the previous annual reexamination or new admission for families paying income-based rent. Any Housing Authority not in compliance with annual income reexamination requirements at the time of the submission of the calculation of operating subsidy shall furnish to the responsible HUD field office a copy of the procedures it is using to achieve compliance and a statement of the number of families that have undergone reexamination during the 12 months preceding the current funding cycle. If, on the basis of this submission or any other information, HUD determines that the Housing Authority is not substantially in compliance with all of the annual income reexamination requirements, HUD shall withhold payments to which the Housing Authority may be entitled under this part. Payment may be withheld in an amount equal to HUD's estimate of the loss of rental income to the Housing Authority resulting from its failure to comply with the requirements. Condition: We noted some tenant files were not recertified, after the tenant moved into the Housing Authority property. Questioned Costs: Cannot be determined, due to incomplete information. Effect: Tenant rent and subsidy calculations are incorrect and not up to date. Cause: Lack of oversight by prior Fayetteville Housing Authority Management. Recommendation: The Fayetteville Housing Authority needs review all tenant files and recertify all tenant files annually. We recommend the Fayetteville Housing Authority implement a schedule to ensure that tenant recertifications are completed annually.
2022-009 Tenant Files - Annual Certifications Were Not Completed in a Timely Manner Federal Awards: 14-850 Public and Indian Housing Low Rent Program 14-870 Housing Choice Voucher Criteria: Under the terms of the Public Housing Occupancy Guide —Complete the reexamination within a year (12 months) of the previous annual reexamination or new admission for families paying income-based rent. Any Housing Authority not in compliance with annual income reexamination requirements at the time of the submission of the calculation of operating subsidy shall furnish to the responsible HUD field office a copy of the procedures it is using to achieve compliance and a statement of the number of families that have undergone reexamination during the 12 months preceding the current funding cycle. If, on the basis of this submission or any other information, HUD determines that the Housing Authority is not substantially in compliance with all of the annual income reexamination requirements, HUD shall withhold payments to which the Housing Authority may be entitled under this part. Payment may be withheld in an amount equal to HUD's estimate of the loss of rental income to the Housing Authority resulting from its failure to comply with the requirements. Condition: We noted tenant files were recertified after the deadline for recertification and well after the twelve-month deadline for recertifications. Questioned Costs: Cannot be determined, due to incomplete information. Effect: Tenant rent and subsidy calculations are incorrect and not up to date. Cause: Lack of oversight by prior Fayetteville Housing Authority Management. Recommendation: The Fayetteville Housing Authority needs review all tenant files and recertify all tenant files in a timely manner. We recommend the Fayetteville Housing Authority implement a schedule to ensure that tenant recertifications are completed annually and on time.
2022-010 Tenant Files - Third Party Income Verification Was Not Performed Federal Awards: 14-850 Public and Indian Housing Low Rent Program Criteria: Under the terms of the Public Housing Occupancy Guide - The EIV System is a web-based application, which provides PHAs with employment, wage, unemployment compensation and social security benefit information for tenants who participate in the Public Housing and various Section 8 programs. PHAs must use the EIV system in its entirety to verify tenant employment and income information during interim and mandatory reexaminations of family composition and income in accordance with 24 CFR § 5.233, 5.236, and other HUD administrative guidance. Condition: We noted that tenant files were missing the EIV system income verification for the tenant's income. Questioned Costs: Cannot be determined, due to incomplete information. Effect: Tenant rent and subsidy calculations could be incorrect due to possible incorrect income being reported by the tenant. Cause: Lack of oversight by prior Fayetteville Housing Authority Management. Recommendation: The Fayetteville Housing Authority needs to review all tenant files to ensure that tenant income has been verified in the EIV system and verification is documented.
2022-011 Tenant Files - Missing Documentation Federal Awards: 14-850 Public and Indian Housing Low Rent Program 14-870 Housing Choice Voucher Criteria: Under the terms of the Annual Contribution Contract, PHAs must maintain a file for each program applicant/participant. Files may be maintained in paper or electronic format. These files are subject to audit and review by HUD, or Independent Public Accountants (IPAs), or HUD's designee upon proper notification to the Housing Authority. The file should include (but is not limited to): housing application and supporting documents, income executed lease(s), unit inspection reports, verifications, leases, supplements to lease, notices and letters, income and rent determinations and a summary of Housing Authority interactions with the tenant. The Housing Authority must maintain these files in an area that is secure and private. The Housing Authority must also have record retention and destruction policies. Condition: We noted that tenant files were missing some, if not all, of the document required by HUD for its tenant files. Questioned Costs: Cannot be determined, due to incomplete information. Effect: Tenant files are incomplete. Cause: Lack of oversight by prior Fayetteville Housing Authority Management. Recommendation: The Fayetteville Housing Authority needs to review all tenant files and ensure that tenant files contain all required HUD documentation. We also recommend that the Fayetteville Housing Authority set up a system to ensure that all required documentation in included in the tenant file for each recertification of the tenant.
2022-012 Tenant Files - Rental Lease Does Not Agree with Rental Register Federal Awards: 14-850 Public and Indian Housing Low Rent Program 14-870 Housing Choice Voucher Criteria: The Housing Authority's rental register and rents collected, should match the rents on the signed lease and HUD 50058 for tenant portion of rent. Condition: The rents shown on the Fayetteville Housing Authority's rental register did not match the tenant portion of rents shown in the tenant files. Questioned Costs: Cannot be determined, due to incomplete information. Effect: The Fayetteville Housing Authority is collecting incorrect rent from its tenants. Cause: Lack of oversight by prior Fayetteville Housing Authority Management. Recommendation: The Fayetteville Housing Authority needs to review all tenant files and compare the tenant portion of rent listed to the rental register and adjust the rental register to reflect the correct rents and notify the tenant of their correct rents.
2022-013 HUD Procurement Policies Were Not Followed Federal Awards: 14-850 Public and Indian Housing Low Rent Program Criteria: In accordance with HUD Procurement policies, competitive proposals are used to purchase professional services where the total cost will exceed $ 100,000. The grantee must solicit proposals from an adequate number of qualified sources. Condition: We noted on several instances that the Fayetteville Housing Authority solicited proposal from a single contractor for services over the $100,000. Questioned Costs: Unknown. Effect: The Fayetteville Housing Authority did not ensure that Federal funds were expended in most efficient and economical way. Cause: Lack of oversight by prior Fayetteville Housing Authority Management. Recommendation: We recommend that the Fayetteville Housing Authority perform advance planning to provide the Fayetteville Housing Authority with adequate time to accomplish its procurement actions. The Fayetteville Housing Authority should periodically review its records of prior purchases, as well as future needs, to find patterns of procurement actions that could be performed more efficiently or economically.
2022-014 Incomplete Contract Files Federal Awards: 14-872 Capital Fund Program Criteria In accordance with HUD Procurement Policy - General 24 (CFR 85.36(b)(9)). The Housing Authority must maintain records sufficient to detail the significant history of each procurement action. Such documentation is particularly important in the event a protest is lodged against the Housing Authority. It will also facilitate future purchases of similar supplies or services since it will not be necessary to recreate solicitation documents. Supporting documentation shall be in writing and placed in the procurement file. Conditions: We noted that contract files were incomplete and missing significant documentation related to the contract. Questioned Costs: Unknown. Effect: With incomplete contract files, it is difficult to verify the progress and expenditures related to the contracts the Fayetteville Housing Authority has entered into. Cause: Lack of oversight by prior Fayetteville Housing Authority Management. Recommendation: We recommend that the Fayetteville Housing Authority review all contract files and ensure they have complete documentation of the contract, expenditures related to that contract and progress reports. We also recommend that going forward contract files be kept in accordance to HUD procurement polies.
2022-015 Misappropriation of Capital Fund Reserve for Emergencies and Natural Disasters Federal Awards: 14-872 Capital Fund Program Criteria: Housing Authorities are permitted to expend federal funds in accordance with the agreements stated forth in the awards and not for any other purpose. Condition: On September 1, 2017, the Fayetteville Housing Authority requested emergency funding from the Capital Fund Reserve for Emergencies and Natural Disaster Funds for the replacement of HVAC piping, domestic water piping and sewer line piping at the Fayetteville Housing Authority's Hillcrest Towers, in the amount of $3,810,271. The Fayetteville Housing Authority had two years to fully expend the grant. Fayetteville Housing Authority may not use this funding for any other purpose other than the replacement of HVAC piping, domestic water piping and sewer line piping at Hillcrest Towers. Fayetteville Housing Authority may not use this funding to pay for deferred maintenance or the cost of operations. The Fayetteville Housing Authority used some of the funding designated for HVAC piping, domestic water piping and sewer line piping for relocation costs, food allowances and other Fayetteville Housing Authority expenses for Fayetteville Housing Authority tenants misplaced by the repairs taking place at Hillcrest Towers. Questioned Costs: Cannot be determined, due to incomplete information. Effect: The Fayetteville Housing Authority misused federal funding. Cause: Lack of oversight by prior Fayetteville Housing Authority Management. Recommendation: We recommend the Fayetteville Housing Authority review all expenditures related to the Emergency Grant and ensure that those expenditures were only for the replacement of HVAC piping, domestic water piping and sewer line piping. If expenditures are not related to the replacement of piping, the Fayetteville Housing Authority should make arrangement to repay those funds to the funding agency.
2022-016 Missing Documentation - Invoices for Accounts Payable Purchases Federal Awards: 14-850 Public and Indian Housing Low Rent Program Criteria: Accurate record keeping and reporting are crucial to the successful management of Housing Authority funded activities. The Housing Authority is charged with maintaining source documents and files that support the financial transactions recorded in the books, providing an adequate audit trail. Condition: The Fayetteville Housing Authority was unable to produce requested documents and receipts supporting Fayetteville Housing Authority expenditures. Questioned Costs: Cannot be determined, due to incomplete information. Effect: The Fayetteville Housing Authority's expenditures were not supported. Cause: Lack of oversight by prior Fayetteville Housing Authority Management. Recommendation: We recommend the Fayetteville Housing Authority implement a system to maintain source documents and files that support the financial transactions.
2022-017 Missing Documentation - Davis-Bacon Certified Payroll Reports Federal Awards: 14-872 Capital Fund Program Criteria: Requested information should be readily available for audit examination. The Housing Authority is responsible for the proper administration and enforcement of the Federal labor standards provisions on contracts covered by Davis Bacon requirements, and therefore must maintain all Davis-Bacon certified payroll reports (0MB No. 1235-0008) for the entire length of the contract. Condition: The Fayetteville Housing Authority was unable to locate all of the weekly Davis-Bacon certified payroll reports related to the Emergency Grant. Questioned Costs: Undetermined due to missing documentation. Effect: We are unable to determine that all laborers were paid the prevailing wage rate, as determined by the United States Department of Labor. Cause: Lack of oversight by prior Fayetteville Housing Authority Management. Recommendation: We recommend the Fayetteville Housing Authority's management place a greater emphasis in safe keeping its records and ensuring that all information requested is readily available for audit examination. We also recommend that the Fayetteville Housing Authority monitor labor standard compliance by conducting interviews with construction workers at the job site, reviews payroll reports, and oversees any additional enforcement actions that may be required.
2022-018 Missing Documentation - Receipts for Credit Card Purchases Federal Awards: 14-850 Public and Indian Housing Low Rent Program Criteria: Requested information should be readily available for audit examination. Condition: The Fayetteville Housing Authority was unable to locate some receipts to credit card purchases for audit examination. Questioned Costs: Undetermined due to missing documentation. Effect: We are unable to determine the accuracy of the financial statement amounts due to lack of supporting documentation. Cause: Prior management of the Fayetteville Housing Authority did not secure all the required receipts for supporting documentation. Recommendation: We recommend the Fayetteville Housing Authority's management place a greater emphasis in safe keeping its records to ensure all receipts for every transaction is accounted for.
2022-019 Internal Controls Were Not Followed Federal Awards: 14-850 Public and Indian Housing Low Rent Program 14-872 Capital Fund Program 14-870 Housing Choice Vouchers Criteria: Invoices for accounts payables should be properly authorized for payment prior to entry into the computer software. Condition: Invoices for accounts payables were not properly authorized by Fayetteville Housing Authority’s prior management. Questioned Costs: Unknown. Effect: No clear document trail on disbursements. Cause: The prior management of Fayetteville Housing Authority did not place emphasis on ensuring that the invoices paid were being reviewed and authorized. Recommendation: We recommend that the Fayetteville Housing Authority ensure that all invoices are adequately initialed or signed to ensure that they are correct and authorized.
2022-020 Tenant Files – Unit Inspections Not Completed Annually Federal Awards: 14-850 Public and Indian Housing Low Rent Program 14-870 Housing Choice Vouchers Criteria: The Housing Authority must ensure that the units are inspected annually. Public housing and multifamily housing properties are inspected every 1 to 3 years and upon move out and move ins. The housing choice voucher program unit must be inspected before the property can rented and afterwards, inspections occur every 1 to 2 years. Condition: We noted some tenant files were not inspected prior to the tenants moving in, as well as then being inspected on an annual basis. Questioned Costs: Unknown. Effect: Housing conditions for those units may not have been up to the standard required. Cause: Lack of oversight by prior Fayetteville Housing Authority Management. Recommendation: The Fayetteville Housing Authority must ensure that all units are inspected annually in order to ensure that the conditions are up to the required standards.
2022-021 Unresponsive Attorney Federal Awards: 14-850 Public and Indian Housing Low Rent Program 14-872 Capital Fund Program 14-870 Housing Choice Vouchers Criteria: An attorney for a Housing Authority is required to respond to auditor inquiries on behalf of the Housing Authority. Condition: During our audit we requested a description of any and all material pending or threatened litigation, claims and assessments (excluding unasserted claims and assessments). Questioned Costs: Unknown Effect: The Fayetteville Housing Authority may be subject to pending or actual litigation which should be disclosed in the notes to the financial statements. Cause: Fayetteville Housing Authority management did not ensure a response from their attorney. Recommendation: We recommend that the Fayetteville Housing Authority properly obtain the requested response from its attorney.
2022-008 Tenant Files - Annual Certifications Were Not Done Federal Awards: 14-850 Public and Indian Housing Low Rent Program 14-870 Housing Choice Voucher Criteria: Under the terms of the Public Housing Occupancy Guide - Complete the reexamination within a year (12 months) of the previous annual reexamination or new admission for families paying income-based rent. Any Housing Authority not in compliance with annual income reexamination requirements at the time of the submission of the calculation of operating subsidy shall furnish to the responsible HUD field office a copy of the procedures it is using to achieve compliance and a statement of the number of families that have undergone reexamination during the 12 months preceding the current funding cycle. If, on the basis of this submission or any other information, HUD determines that the Housing Authority is not substantially in compliance with all of the annual income reexamination requirements, HUD shall withhold payments to which the Housing Authority may be entitled under this part. Payment may be withheld in an amount equal to HUD's estimate of the loss of rental income to the Housing Authority resulting from its failure to comply with the requirements. Condition: We noted some tenant files were not recertified, after the tenant moved into the Housing Authority property. Questioned Costs: Cannot be determined, due to incomplete information. Effect: Tenant rent and subsidy calculations are incorrect and not up to date. Cause: Lack of oversight by prior Fayetteville Housing Authority Management. Recommendation: The Fayetteville Housing Authority needs review all tenant files and recertify all tenant files annually. We recommend the Fayetteville Housing Authority implement a schedule to ensure that tenant recertifications are completed annually.
2022-009 Tenant Files - Annual Certifications Were Not Completed in a Timely Manner Federal Awards: 14-850 Public and Indian Housing Low Rent Program 14-870 Housing Choice Voucher Criteria: Under the terms of the Public Housing Occupancy Guide —Complete the reexamination within a year (12 months) of the previous annual reexamination or new admission for families paying income-based rent. Any Housing Authority not in compliance with annual income reexamination requirements at the time of the submission of the calculation of operating subsidy shall furnish to the responsible HUD field office a copy of the procedures it is using to achieve compliance and a statement of the number of families that have undergone reexamination during the 12 months preceding the current funding cycle. If, on the basis of this submission or any other information, HUD determines that the Housing Authority is not substantially in compliance with all of the annual income reexamination requirements, HUD shall withhold payments to which the Housing Authority may be entitled under this part. Payment may be withheld in an amount equal to HUD's estimate of the loss of rental income to the Housing Authority resulting from its failure to comply with the requirements. Condition: We noted tenant files were recertified after the deadline for recertification and well after the twelve-month deadline for recertifications. Questioned Costs: Cannot be determined, due to incomplete information. Effect: Tenant rent and subsidy calculations are incorrect and not up to date. Cause: Lack of oversight by prior Fayetteville Housing Authority Management. Recommendation: The Fayetteville Housing Authority needs review all tenant files and recertify all tenant files in a timely manner. We recommend the Fayetteville Housing Authority implement a schedule to ensure that tenant recertifications are completed annually and on time.
2022-010 Tenant Files - Third Party Income Verification Was Not Performed Federal Awards: 14-850 Public and Indian Housing Low Rent Program Criteria: Under the terms of the Public Housing Occupancy Guide - The EIV System is a web-based application, which provides PHAs with employment, wage, unemployment compensation and social security benefit information for tenants who participate in the Public Housing and various Section 8 programs. PHAs must use the EIV system in its entirety to verify tenant employment and income information during interim and mandatory reexaminations of family composition and income in accordance with 24 CFR § 5.233, 5.236, and other HUD administrative guidance. Condition: We noted that tenant files were missing the EIV system income verification for the tenant's income. Questioned Costs: Cannot be determined, due to incomplete information. Effect: Tenant rent and subsidy calculations could be incorrect due to possible incorrect income being reported by the tenant. Cause: Lack of oversight by prior Fayetteville Housing Authority Management. Recommendation: The Fayetteville Housing Authority needs to review all tenant files to ensure that tenant income has been verified in the EIV system and verification is documented.
2022-011 Tenant Files - Missing Documentation Federal Awards: 14-850 Public and Indian Housing Low Rent Program 14-870 Housing Choice Voucher Criteria: Under the terms of the Annual Contribution Contract, PHAs must maintain a file for each program applicant/participant. Files may be maintained in paper or electronic format. These files are subject to audit and review by HUD, or Independent Public Accountants (IPAs), or HUD's designee upon proper notification to the Housing Authority. The file should include (but is not limited to): housing application and supporting documents, income executed lease(s), unit inspection reports, verifications, leases, supplements to lease, notices and letters, income and rent determinations and a summary of Housing Authority interactions with the tenant. The Housing Authority must maintain these files in an area that is secure and private. The Housing Authority must also have record retention and destruction policies. Condition: We noted that tenant files were missing some, if not all, of the document required by HUD for its tenant files. Questioned Costs: Cannot be determined, due to incomplete information. Effect: Tenant files are incomplete. Cause: Lack of oversight by prior Fayetteville Housing Authority Management. Recommendation: The Fayetteville Housing Authority needs to review all tenant files and ensure that tenant files contain all required HUD documentation. We also recommend that the Fayetteville Housing Authority set up a system to ensure that all required documentation in included in the tenant file for each recertification of the tenant.
2022-012 Tenant Files - Rental Lease Does Not Agree with Rental Register Federal Awards: 14-850 Public and Indian Housing Low Rent Program 14-870 Housing Choice Voucher Criteria: The Housing Authority's rental register and rents collected, should match the rents on the signed lease and HUD 50058 for tenant portion of rent. Condition: The rents shown on the Fayetteville Housing Authority's rental register did not match the tenant portion of rents shown in the tenant files. Questioned Costs: Cannot be determined, due to incomplete information. Effect: The Fayetteville Housing Authority is collecting incorrect rent from its tenants. Cause: Lack of oversight by prior Fayetteville Housing Authority Management. Recommendation: The Fayetteville Housing Authority needs to review all tenant files and compare the tenant portion of rent listed to the rental register and adjust the rental register to reflect the correct rents and notify the tenant of their correct rents.
2022-013 HUD Procurement Policies Were Not Followed Federal Awards: 14-850 Public and Indian Housing Low Rent Program Criteria: In accordance with HUD Procurement policies, competitive proposals are used to purchase professional services where the total cost will exceed $ 100,000. The grantee must solicit proposals from an adequate number of qualified sources. Condition: We noted on several instances that the Fayetteville Housing Authority solicited proposal from a single contractor for services over the $100,000. Questioned Costs: Unknown. Effect: The Fayetteville Housing Authority did not ensure that Federal funds were expended in most efficient and economical way. Cause: Lack of oversight by prior Fayetteville Housing Authority Management. Recommendation: We recommend that the Fayetteville Housing Authority perform advance planning to provide the Fayetteville Housing Authority with adequate time to accomplish its procurement actions. The Fayetteville Housing Authority should periodically review its records of prior purchases, as well as future needs, to find patterns of procurement actions that could be performed more efficiently or economically.
2022-014 Incomplete Contract Files Federal Awards: 14-872 Capital Fund Program Criteria In accordance with HUD Procurement Policy - General 24 (CFR 85.36(b)(9)). The Housing Authority must maintain records sufficient to detail the significant history of each procurement action. Such documentation is particularly important in the event a protest is lodged against the Housing Authority. It will also facilitate future purchases of similar supplies or services since it will not be necessary to recreate solicitation documents. Supporting documentation shall be in writing and placed in the procurement file. Conditions: We noted that contract files were incomplete and missing significant documentation related to the contract. Questioned Costs: Unknown. Effect: With incomplete contract files, it is difficult to verify the progress and expenditures related to the contracts the Fayetteville Housing Authority has entered into. Cause: Lack of oversight by prior Fayetteville Housing Authority Management. Recommendation: We recommend that the Fayetteville Housing Authority review all contract files and ensure they have complete documentation of the contract, expenditures related to that contract and progress reports. We also recommend that going forward contract files be kept in accordance to HUD procurement polies.
2022-015 Misappropriation of Capital Fund Reserve for Emergencies and Natural Disasters Federal Awards: 14-872 Capital Fund Program Criteria: Housing Authorities are permitted to expend federal funds in accordance with the agreements stated forth in the awards and not for any other purpose. Condition: On September 1, 2017, the Fayetteville Housing Authority requested emergency funding from the Capital Fund Reserve for Emergencies and Natural Disaster Funds for the replacement of HVAC piping, domestic water piping and sewer line piping at the Fayetteville Housing Authority's Hillcrest Towers, in the amount of $3,810,271. The Fayetteville Housing Authority had two years to fully expend the grant. Fayetteville Housing Authority may not use this funding for any other purpose other than the replacement of HVAC piping, domestic water piping and sewer line piping at Hillcrest Towers. Fayetteville Housing Authority may not use this funding to pay for deferred maintenance or the cost of operations. The Fayetteville Housing Authority used some of the funding designated for HVAC piping, domestic water piping and sewer line piping for relocation costs, food allowances and other Fayetteville Housing Authority expenses for Fayetteville Housing Authority tenants misplaced by the repairs taking place at Hillcrest Towers. Questioned Costs: Cannot be determined, due to incomplete information. Effect: The Fayetteville Housing Authority misused federal funding. Cause: Lack of oversight by prior Fayetteville Housing Authority Management. Recommendation: We recommend the Fayetteville Housing Authority review all expenditures related to the Emergency Grant and ensure that those expenditures were only for the replacement of HVAC piping, domestic water piping and sewer line piping. If expenditures are not related to the replacement of piping, the Fayetteville Housing Authority should make arrangement to repay those funds to the funding agency.
2022-016 Missing Documentation - Invoices for Accounts Payable Purchases Federal Awards: 14-850 Public and Indian Housing Low Rent Program Criteria: Accurate record keeping and reporting are crucial to the successful management of Housing Authority funded activities. The Housing Authority is charged with maintaining source documents and files that support the financial transactions recorded in the books, providing an adequate audit trail. Condition: The Fayetteville Housing Authority was unable to produce requested documents and receipts supporting Fayetteville Housing Authority expenditures. Questioned Costs: Cannot be determined, due to incomplete information. Effect: The Fayetteville Housing Authority's expenditures were not supported. Cause: Lack of oversight by prior Fayetteville Housing Authority Management. Recommendation: We recommend the Fayetteville Housing Authority implement a system to maintain source documents and files that support the financial transactions.
2022-017 Missing Documentation - Davis-Bacon Certified Payroll Reports Federal Awards: 14-872 Capital Fund Program Criteria: Requested information should be readily available for audit examination. The Housing Authority is responsible for the proper administration and enforcement of the Federal labor standards provisions on contracts covered by Davis Bacon requirements, and therefore must maintain all Davis-Bacon certified payroll reports (0MB No. 1235-0008) for the entire length of the contract. Condition: The Fayetteville Housing Authority was unable to locate all of the weekly Davis-Bacon certified payroll reports related to the Emergency Grant. Questioned Costs: Undetermined due to missing documentation. Effect: We are unable to determine that all laborers were paid the prevailing wage rate, as determined by the United States Department of Labor. Cause: Lack of oversight by prior Fayetteville Housing Authority Management. Recommendation: We recommend the Fayetteville Housing Authority's management place a greater emphasis in safe keeping its records and ensuring that all information requested is readily available for audit examination. We also recommend that the Fayetteville Housing Authority monitor labor standard compliance by conducting interviews with construction workers at the job site, reviews payroll reports, and oversees any additional enforcement actions that may be required.
2022-018 Missing Documentation - Receipts for Credit Card Purchases Federal Awards: 14-850 Public and Indian Housing Low Rent Program Criteria: Requested information should be readily available for audit examination. Condition: The Fayetteville Housing Authority was unable to locate some receipts to credit card purchases for audit examination. Questioned Costs: Undetermined due to missing documentation. Effect: We are unable to determine the accuracy of the financial statement amounts due to lack of supporting documentation. Cause: Prior management of the Fayetteville Housing Authority did not secure all the required receipts for supporting documentation. Recommendation: We recommend the Fayetteville Housing Authority's management place a greater emphasis in safe keeping its records to ensure all receipts for every transaction is accounted for.
2022-019 Internal Controls Were Not Followed Federal Awards: 14-850 Public and Indian Housing Low Rent Program 14-872 Capital Fund Program 14-870 Housing Choice Vouchers Criteria: Invoices for accounts payables should be properly authorized for payment prior to entry into the computer software. Condition: Invoices for accounts payables were not properly authorized by Fayetteville Housing Authority’s prior management. Questioned Costs: Unknown. Effect: No clear document trail on disbursements. Cause: The prior management of Fayetteville Housing Authority did not place emphasis on ensuring that the invoices paid were being reviewed and authorized. Recommendation: We recommend that the Fayetteville Housing Authority ensure that all invoices are adequately initialed or signed to ensure that they are correct and authorized.
2022-020 Tenant Files – Unit Inspections Not Completed Annually Federal Awards: 14-850 Public and Indian Housing Low Rent Program 14-870 Housing Choice Vouchers Criteria: The Housing Authority must ensure that the units are inspected annually. Public housing and multifamily housing properties are inspected every 1 to 3 years and upon move out and move ins. The housing choice voucher program unit must be inspected before the property can rented and afterwards, inspections occur every 1 to 2 years. Condition: We noted some tenant files were not inspected prior to the tenants moving in, as well as then being inspected on an annual basis. Questioned Costs: Unknown. Effect: Housing conditions for those units may not have been up to the standard required. Cause: Lack of oversight by prior Fayetteville Housing Authority Management. Recommendation: The Fayetteville Housing Authority must ensure that all units are inspected annually in order to ensure that the conditions are up to the required standards.
2022-021 Unresponsive Attorney Federal Awards: 14-850 Public and Indian Housing Low Rent Program 14-872 Capital Fund Program 14-870 Housing Choice Vouchers Criteria: An attorney for a Housing Authority is required to respond to auditor inquiries on behalf of the Housing Authority. Condition: During our audit we requested a description of any and all material pending or threatened litigation, claims and assessments (excluding unasserted claims and assessments). Questioned Costs: Unknown Effect: The Fayetteville Housing Authority may be subject to pending or actual litigation which should be disclosed in the notes to the financial statements. Cause: Fayetteville Housing Authority management did not ensure a response from their attorney. Recommendation: We recommend that the Fayetteville Housing Authority properly obtain the requested response from its attorney.