Audit 317052

FY End
2023-12-31
Total Expended
$2.00M
Findings
2
Programs
5
Organization: McKenzie River Trust (OR)
Year: 2023 Accepted: 2024-08-12

Organization Exclusion Status:

Checking exclusion status...

Findings

ID Ref Severity Repeat Requirement
480944 2023-001 Significant Deficiency - I
1057386 2023-001 Significant Deficiency - I

Contacts

Name Title Type
HBBNV79D25Y5 Joe Moll Auditee
5413452799 Katie Sheffield Auditor
No contacts on file

Notes to SEFA

Accounting Policies: Basis of Presentation The accompanying schedule of expenditures of federal awards includes the federal award activity of McKenzie River Trust. The information in this schedule is presented in accordance with the requirements of Title 2 CFR Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance). Therefore, some amounts presented in this schedule may differ from amounts presented in, or used in the preparation of the basic financial statements. Federal award program titles are reported as presented in the Assistance Listings (AL) and are based on beta.sam.gov. Federal Award program titles not presented in AL are identified by Federal Agency number followed by (.xxx). Basis of Accounting The expenditures for each federal financial assistance programs are presented in the schedule on the accrual basis of accounting. De Minimis Rate Used: Y Rate Explanation: McKenzie River Trust used the 10% de minimis indirect cost rate under the Uniform Guidance

Finding Details

Type: Federal Award - Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance – Procurement and Suspension & Debarment AL Number: 11.469 – Congressionally Identified Awards and Projects Criteria/Requirement: Non-federal entities are prohibited from contracting with or making subawards under covered transactions to parties that are suspended or debarred. According to 2 CFR section 180, when a non-federal entity enters into a covered transaction with an entity at a lower tier, the non-federal entity must verify that the entity is not suspended or debarred or otherwise excluded from participating in the transaction. Condition/Context: In 1 of 1 procurement sample tested the vendor was not verified by the Organization for suspension or debarment. A retroactive verification was run showing the vendor was not suspended or debarred. Cause: The Organization’s policy states that they will ensure that a contractor is not suspended nor debarred by a federal agency. However, the policy was not followed. Effect: A suspended or debarred vendor may be used. Questioned Costs: None Recommendation: The Organization should follow the internal policy established, verifying a vendor is not suspended or debarred before entering covered transactions. This could be done by documenting the use of Sam.gov to search for the entity’s name against the exclusions listing, by collecting a certification from the entity, or by adding a clause or a condition to the contract with the entity. A checklist for procurement or a procurement summary document might also assist in ensuring the Organization is following the established policy. Management’s Response: Management concurs with the finding and has developed a corrective action plan. We understand a deficiency is identified in the internal control over compliance. We place the utmost importance on the summary of auditors’ results and will work to increase the strength of our internal controls over compliance.
Type: Federal Award - Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance – Procurement and Suspension & Debarment AL Number: 11.469 – Congressionally Identified Awards and Projects Criteria/Requirement: Non-federal entities are prohibited from contracting with or making subawards under covered transactions to parties that are suspended or debarred. According to 2 CFR section 180, when a non-federal entity enters into a covered transaction with an entity at a lower tier, the non-federal entity must verify that the entity is not suspended or debarred or otherwise excluded from participating in the transaction. Condition/Context: In 1 of 1 procurement sample tested the vendor was not verified by the Organization for suspension or debarment. A retroactive verification was run showing the vendor was not suspended or debarred. Cause: The Organization’s policy states that they will ensure that a contractor is not suspended nor debarred by a federal agency. However, the policy was not followed. Effect: A suspended or debarred vendor may be used. Questioned Costs: None Recommendation: The Organization should follow the internal policy established, verifying a vendor is not suspended or debarred before entering covered transactions. This could be done by documenting the use of Sam.gov to search for the entity’s name against the exclusions listing, by collecting a certification from the entity, or by adding a clause or a condition to the contract with the entity. A checklist for procurement or a procurement summary document might also assist in ensuring the Organization is following the established policy. Management’s Response: Management concurs with the finding and has developed a corrective action plan. We understand a deficiency is identified in the internal control over compliance. We place the utmost importance on the summary of auditors’ results and will work to increase the strength of our internal controls over compliance.