Audit 315302

FY End
2023-09-30
Total Expended
$1.18M
Findings
2
Programs
6
Year: 2023 Accepted: 2024-07-17
Auditor: Pgm LLC

Organization Exclusion Status:

Checking exclusion status...

Findings

ID Ref Severity Repeat Requirement
478671 2023-001 Significant Deficiency - A
1055113 2023-001 Significant Deficiency - A

Contacts

Name Title Type
GDCUU25TJM91 Charlene Virgilio Peter Montano Auditee
2078666546 Peter G. Montano Auditor
No contacts on file

Notes to SEFA

Title: Note 1 - Basis of Presentation Accounting Policies: Expenditures on the Schedule are reported on the accrual basis of accounting. Such expenditures are recognized following the cost principles contained in the Uniform Guidance, wherein certain types of expenditures are not allowable or are limited as to reimbursement. Pass-through entity identifying numbers are presented where available. De Minimis Rate Used: Y Rate Explanation: Four Directions Development Corporation does not have an indirect cost rate. The accompanying schedule of expenditures of federal awards (the Schedule) includes the federal grant activities of Four Directions Development Corporation under the programs of the federal government for the year ended September 30, 2023. The information in this schedule is presented in accordance with the requirements of the Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles and Audit Requirements of Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance). Because the schedule presents only a selected portion of the operations of Four Directions Development Corporation, it is not intended to and does not present the financial position, changes in net assets or cash flows of Four Directions Development Corporation.
Title: Note 2 - Summary of Significant Accounting Policies Accounting Policies: Expenditures on the Schedule are reported on the accrual basis of accounting. Such expenditures are recognized following the cost principles contained in the Uniform Guidance, wherein certain types of expenditures are not allowable or are limited as to reimbursement. Pass-through entity identifying numbers are presented where available. De Minimis Rate Used: Y Rate Explanation: Four Directions Development Corporation does not have an indirect cost rate. Expenditures on the Schedule are reported on the accrual basis of accounting. Such expenditures are recognized following the cost principles contained in the Uniform Guidance, wherein certain types of expenditures are not allowable or are limited as to reimbursement. Pass-through entity identifying numbers are presented where available.
Title: Note 3 - Subrecipient Agreements Accounting Policies: Expenditures on the Schedule are reported on the accrual basis of accounting. Such expenditures are recognized following the cost principles contained in the Uniform Guidance, wherein certain types of expenditures are not allowable or are limited as to reimbursement. Pass-through entity identifying numbers are presented where available. De Minimis Rate Used: Y Rate Explanation: Four Directions Development Corporation does not have an indirect cost rate. The organization does not provide grants to subrecipients
Title: Note 4 - Indirect Cost Rate Accounting Policies: Expenditures on the Schedule are reported on the accrual basis of accounting. Such expenditures are recognized following the cost principles contained in the Uniform Guidance, wherein certain types of expenditures are not allowable or are limited as to reimbursement. Pass-through entity identifying numbers are presented where available. De Minimis Rate Used: Y Rate Explanation: Four Directions Development Corporation does not have an indirect cost rate. Four Directions Development Corporation does not have an indirect cost rate.

Finding Details

Criteria: Uniform Guidance requires that salaries charged to Federal awards are subject to its Standards of Documentation which state that salaries and wages must be based on records that accurately reflect the work performed. CDFI award states fringe benefits such as annual leave and holiday are allowable as long as they are made under formally established and consistently applied policies and subject to Uniform Guidance requirements. . UG states leave such as holidays and paid time off are allowable under specific circumstances, one of which is that they are equally allocated to all activities and Federal awards. The award also prohibits indirect costs. Condition: During our audit we tested a sample of salary charges and cash disbursements to the award during the period ended September 30, 2023. One charge to salaries was a journal entry posted at year end and the other a journal entry to expenditures for the respective fringe benefits. The timesheets provided to support these charges did not have time directly charged to the CDFI FA award. In addition, the PAR report provided to support the entries included time that would be in normal circumstances classified as indirect activities based on definitions in the Uniform Guidance section 200.413 and not allowable under the award. Cause: An analysis was performed by Management at year end to review salaries charged to funding sources. General journal entries were then posted to salaries and fringe to reallocate time and fringe charged to unrestricted awards to the CDFI award but not to any other award. The methodology used to charge and time and fringe in the analysis was not consistent with the methodology used throughout the year. In addition, there was confusion as to the requirements of the award and the requirements imposed by the Uniform Guidance and how the two interact. For instance, some items such as leave and holiday were considered allowable in the analysis, but Uniform Guidance puts specific criteria that must be met for it to be allowable. There was also confusion on what is considered a direct administrative cost (costs identified with a specific award) and indirect costs which apply to multiple awards. Effect: This process overrode the bi-weekly internal controls and created errors in the reclassification. The reclassification included indirect costs charged as direct costs and benefits such as annual leave and holidays not charged appropriately or consistently across the multiple awards as required by Uniform Guidance. Question Costs None. The Organization had met the terms of the award through the deployment of loan products.
Criteria: Uniform Guidance requires that salaries charged to Federal awards are subject to its Standards of Documentation which state that salaries and wages must be based on records that accurately reflect the work performed. CDFI award states fringe benefits such as annual leave and holiday are allowable as long as they are made under formally established and consistently applied policies and subject to Uniform Guidance requirements. . UG states leave such as holidays and paid time off are allowable under specific circumstances, one of which is that they are equally allocated to all activities and Federal awards. The award also prohibits indirect costs. Condition: During our audit we tested a sample of salary charges and cash disbursements to the award during the period ended September 30, 2023. One charge to salaries was a journal entry posted at year end and the other a journal entry to expenditures for the respective fringe benefits. The timesheets provided to support these charges did not have time directly charged to the CDFI FA award. In addition, the PAR report provided to support the entries included time that would be in normal circumstances classified as indirect activities based on definitions in the Uniform Guidance section 200.413 and not allowable under the award. Cause: An analysis was performed by Management at year end to review salaries charged to funding sources. General journal entries were then posted to salaries and fringe to reallocate time and fringe charged to unrestricted awards to the CDFI award but not to any other award. The methodology used to charge and time and fringe in the analysis was not consistent with the methodology used throughout the year. In addition, there was confusion as to the requirements of the award and the requirements imposed by the Uniform Guidance and how the two interact. For instance, some items such as leave and holiday were considered allowable in the analysis, but Uniform Guidance puts specific criteria that must be met for it to be allowable. There was also confusion on what is considered a direct administrative cost (costs identified with a specific award) and indirect costs which apply to multiple awards. Effect: This process overrode the bi-weekly internal controls and created errors in the reclassification. The reclassification included indirect costs charged as direct costs and benefits such as annual leave and holidays not charged appropriately or consistently across the multiple awards as required by Uniform Guidance. Question Costs None. The Organization had met the terms of the award through the deployment of loan products.