Audit 312062

FY End
2022-06-30
Total Expended
$12.98M
Findings
10
Programs
12
Organization: Municipality of Yauco (PR)
Year: 2022 Accepted: 2023-08-03

Organization Exclusion Status:

Checking exclusion status...

Findings

ID Ref Severity Repeat Requirement
411337 2022-007 Material Weakness Yes N
411338 2022-007 Material Weakness Yes N
411339 2022-008 Significant Deficiency - P
411340 2022-008 Significant Deficiency - P
411341 2022-008 Significant Deficiency - P
987779 2022-007 Material Weakness Yes N
987780 2022-007 Material Weakness Yes N
987781 2022-008 Significant Deficiency - P
987782 2022-008 Significant Deficiency - P
987783 2022-008 Significant Deficiency - P

Contacts

Name Title Type
EBAAZ6TSVJZ5 Efren Ruberte Auditee
7878561340 Angel A. Lopez Vega Auditor
No contacts on file

Notes to SEFA

Accounting Policies: BASIS OF PRESENTATIONThe accompanying Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards includes the federal grant activity of the Municipality underprograms of the federal government for the year ended June 30, 2022. The information in this schedule is presented in accordancewith the requirements of Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles,and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance). Therefore, some amounts presented in this schedule may differfrom the amounts presented in, or used in the preparation of, the basic financial statements. Because the schedule presents onlya selected portion of the operations of the Municipality, it is not intended to and does not present the financial position and changesin net position of the Municipality.2. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIESExpenditures reported on the Schedule are reported on the modified accrual basis of accounting. Expenditures are recognizedwhen the related liability is incurred, following the cost principles contained in the Uniform Guidance, wherein certain types ofexpenditures are not allowable or are limited as to reimbursement. Expenditures for the following programs are recognized basedon other unique requirements:? Section 8 Housing Choice Voucher Program (HCV). Expenditures are reported on a statutory basis as required by theU.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development. Such expenditures should equal the net ACC subsidy for the PHAsfiscal period.? Public assistance grants (FEMA). Expenditures are recognized in the period when: (1) FEMA has approved the PW,and (2) eligible expenditures are incurred.? Loans or loans guarantee programs. Expenditures equal the value of new loans made or received during the auditperiod plus the beginning of the audit period balance of outstanding loans from previous years for which the federalgovernment imposes continuing compliance requirements. For loans with no imposed continuing compliancerequirements, expenditures are recognized when the related costs financed with loan proceeds are incurred.3. ASSISTANCE LISTING NUMBER AND PASS-THROUGH ENTITY IDENTIFYING NUMBERThe Assistance Listing Number (ALN), formerly known as the Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance (CFDA) Number, is afive-digit number assigned in the awarding document for all federal assistance award mechanisms, including federal grants andcooperative agreements. Assistance listings are detailed public descriptions of federal programs that provide grants, loans,scholarships, insurance, and other types of assistance awards. The Sam.gov assistance listing is the publicly available onlinedatabase showing all available Federally-funded programs.State or local government redistributions of federal awards to the Municipality, known as passthrough awards, should betreated by the Municipality as though they were received directly from the federal government. The Uniform Guidance requiresthe schedule to include the name of the passthrough entity and the identifying number assigned by the passthrough entity forthe federal awards received as a sub recipient. Numbers identified as N/A are not applicable and numbers identified as N/AVare not available. De Minimis Rate Used: N Rate Explanation: The auditee did not use the de minimis cost rate.

Finding Details

As part of our audit procedures over the monthly submitted reports, Voucher Management System (VMS), we required evidence of how the Administrative Fee Equity and HAP Equity were calculated. The accountant didn't provide a monthly detail that reconciled with the information submitted in the VMS. In addition, the amounts presented in the VMS at June 30, 2022, do not reconcile with the amounts presented in the Financial Data Schedule (FDS).
As part of our audit procedures over the monthly submitted reports, Voucher Management System (VMS), we required evidence of how the Administrative Fee Equity and HAP Equity were calculated. The accountant didn't provide a monthly detail that reconciled with the information submitted in the VMS. In addition, the amounts presented in the VMS at June 30, 2022, do not reconcile with the amounts presented in the Financial Data Schedule (FDS).
The Municipality did not submit, in a timely manner, to the Federal Audit Clearinghouse, the Single Audit Reporting package for the fiscal year ending on June 30, 2022. The due date for this report was no later than March 31, 2023.
The Municipality did not submit, in a timely manner, to the Federal Audit Clearinghouse, the Single Audit Reporting package for the fiscal year ending on June 30, 2022. The due date for this report was no later than March 31, 2023.
The Municipality did not submit, in a timely manner, to the Federal Audit Clearinghouse, the Single Audit Reporting package for the fiscal year ending on June 30, 2022. The due date for this report was no later than March 31, 2023.
As part of our audit procedures over the monthly submitted reports, Voucher Management System (VMS), we required evidence of how the Administrative Fee Equity and HAP Equity were calculated. The accountant didn't provide a monthly detail that reconciled with the information submitted in the VMS. In addition, the amounts presented in the VMS at June 30, 2022, do not reconcile with the amounts presented in the Financial Data Schedule (FDS).
As part of our audit procedures over the monthly submitted reports, Voucher Management System (VMS), we required evidence of how the Administrative Fee Equity and HAP Equity were calculated. The accountant didn't provide a monthly detail that reconciled with the information submitted in the VMS. In addition, the amounts presented in the VMS at June 30, 2022, do not reconcile with the amounts presented in the Financial Data Schedule (FDS).
The Municipality did not submit, in a timely manner, to the Federal Audit Clearinghouse, the Single Audit Reporting package for the fiscal year ending on June 30, 2022. The due date for this report was no later than March 31, 2023.
The Municipality did not submit, in a timely manner, to the Federal Audit Clearinghouse, the Single Audit Reporting package for the fiscal year ending on June 30, 2022. The due date for this report was no later than March 31, 2023.
The Municipality did not submit, in a timely manner, to the Federal Audit Clearinghouse, the Single Audit Reporting package for the fiscal year ending on June 30, 2022. The due date for this report was no later than March 31, 2023.