Audit 310458

FY End
2023-09-30
Total Expended
$4.58M
Findings
4
Programs
2
Year: 2023 Accepted: 2024-06-27
Auditor: Cohnreznick LLP

Organization Exclusion Status:

Checking exclusion status...

Findings

ID Ref Severity Repeat Requirement
403280 2023-001 Significant Deficiency - E
403281 2023-002 Significant Deficiency - N
979722 2023-001 Significant Deficiency - E
979723 2023-002 Significant Deficiency - N

Contacts

Name Title Type
TZNVJV2R7J19 Major Roland Cox Auditee
4047281322 Dan Worrall Auditor
No contacts on file

Notes to SEFA

Title: Note A - Basis of presentation Accounting Policies: Note B - Expenditures reported on the Schedule are reported on the accrual basis of accounting. Such expenditures are recognized following, as applicable, the cost principles contained in the Uniform Guidance, whereas certain types of expenditures are not allowable or are limited as to reimbursement. Booth Residence, Inc., a Georgia Corporation has elected not to use the 10-percent de minimis indirect cost rate allowed under Uniform Guidance. De Minimis Rate Used: N Rate Explanation: The auditee did not use the de minimis cost rate. The accompanying schedule of expenditures of federal awards includes the federal award activity of Booth Residence, Inc., a Georgia Corporation, HUD Project No.: 061-11293, under programs of the federal government for the year ended September 30, 2023. The information in this Schedule is presented in accordance with the requirements of Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards ("Uniform Guidance"). For the year ended September 30, 2023, no awards were passed through to subrecipients.
Title: Note C - U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development loan program Accounting Policies: Note B - Expenditures reported on the Schedule are reported on the accrual basis of accounting. Such expenditures are recognized following, as applicable, the cost principles contained in the Uniform Guidance, whereas certain types of expenditures are not allowable or are limited as to reimbursement. Booth Residence, Inc., a Georgia Corporation has elected not to use the 10-percent de minimis indirect cost rate allowed under Uniform Guidance. De Minimis Rate Used: N Rate Explanation: The auditee did not use the de minimis cost rate. Booth Residence, Inc., a Georgia Corporation has received a U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development direct loan under Section 223(a)(7) of the National Housing Act. The loan balance outstanding at the beginning of the year is included in the federal expenditures presented in the Schedule. Booth Residence, Inc., a Georgia Corporation received no additional loans during the year. The balance of the loan outstanding at September 30, 2023 consists of: See the Notes to the SEFA for chart/table

Finding Details

Department of Housing and Urban Development Section 8 Housing Assistance Program, AL 14.195 Criteria Tenant lease files are required to be maintained and tenant eligibility determined in accordance with HUD Handbook 4350.3, Occupancy Requirements of Subsidized Multifamily Housing Programs. Condition In connection with our lease file review we noted the following deficiencies: -6 out of 9 tenants tested did not have documentation in their lease file that their income was verified using EIV. - 2 out of 2 tenants tested did not have move in inspections in their lease files Cause Management's policies with respect to the determination of tenant eligibility and the maintenance of tenant lease files in accordance with HUD Handbook 4350.3, Occupancy Requirements of Subsidized Multifamily Housing Programs were not consistently followed, and there were no procedures in place to ensure these tasks were performed during transition to new management. Effect The procedures for determining eligibility and maintaining tenant lease files were not consistently applied in accordance with HUD Handbook 4350.3, Occupancy Requirements of Subsidized Multifamily Housing Programs. This could result in units being rented to ineligible tenants or errors in the rent subsidies paid by HUD. Questioned Costs: None Context Procedures were not in place during the transition to new management to ensure HUD policies as it relates to tenant eligibility and maintaining tenant lease files were not followed at all times. Identification as a Repeat Finding This finding is not a repeat finding Recommendation We recommend that management review its internal controls over obtaining and maintaining tenant file documentation to ensure compliance with eligibility requirements. Views of Responsible Officials
Department of Housing and Urban Development Section 8 Housing Assistance Program, AL 14.195 Criteria HUD regulations require the project’s management agent to have fidelity bond coverage equal to the greater of $50,000 or the value of two months gross potential rent. If the policy covers more than one project, this minimum must be computed using the project with the highest gross potential rent. Condition The Owner did not provide evidence of fidelity bond coverage as required by HUD regulations. Cause The Owner was unable to provide evidence of the required minimum coverage. Effect Management may have coverage below HUD’s required minimum in violation of HUD regulations. Questioned Costs: None Context The Owner did not provide evidence of fidelity bond coverage to the audit team. Identification as a Repeat Finding This finding is not a repeat finding Recommendation Management should obtain fidelity coverage as required by HUD regulations immediately or should provide evidence sufficient fidelity bond insurance was obtained through the year ended September 30, 2023. Views of Responsible Officials
Department of Housing and Urban Development Section 8 Housing Assistance Program, AL 14.195 Criteria Tenant lease files are required to be maintained and tenant eligibility determined in accordance with HUD Handbook 4350.3, Occupancy Requirements of Subsidized Multifamily Housing Programs. Condition In connection with our lease file review we noted the following deficiencies: -6 out of 9 tenants tested did not have documentation in their lease file that their income was verified using EIV. - 2 out of 2 tenants tested did not have move in inspections in their lease files Cause Management's policies with respect to the determination of tenant eligibility and the maintenance of tenant lease files in accordance with HUD Handbook 4350.3, Occupancy Requirements of Subsidized Multifamily Housing Programs were not consistently followed, and there were no procedures in place to ensure these tasks were performed during transition to new management. Effect The procedures for determining eligibility and maintaining tenant lease files were not consistently applied in accordance with HUD Handbook 4350.3, Occupancy Requirements of Subsidized Multifamily Housing Programs. This could result in units being rented to ineligible tenants or errors in the rent subsidies paid by HUD. Questioned Costs: None Context Procedures were not in place during the transition to new management to ensure HUD policies as it relates to tenant eligibility and maintaining tenant lease files were not followed at all times. Identification as a Repeat Finding This finding is not a repeat finding Recommendation We recommend that management review its internal controls over obtaining and maintaining tenant file documentation to ensure compliance with eligibility requirements. Views of Responsible Officials
Department of Housing and Urban Development Section 8 Housing Assistance Program, AL 14.195 Criteria HUD regulations require the project’s management agent to have fidelity bond coverage equal to the greater of $50,000 or the value of two months gross potential rent. If the policy covers more than one project, this minimum must be computed using the project with the highest gross potential rent. Condition The Owner did not provide evidence of fidelity bond coverage as required by HUD regulations. Cause The Owner was unable to provide evidence of the required minimum coverage. Effect Management may have coverage below HUD’s required minimum in violation of HUD regulations. Questioned Costs: None Context The Owner did not provide evidence of fidelity bond coverage to the audit team. Identification as a Repeat Finding This finding is not a repeat finding Recommendation Management should obtain fidelity coverage as required by HUD regulations immediately or should provide evidence sufficient fidelity bond insurance was obtained through the year ended September 30, 2023. Views of Responsible Officials