During our review of the Fiscal Operations Report and Application to Participate (FISAP) for the applications to participate for the 2022-2023 and 2021-2022 award years for OPEIDs 00394100, 02587500, and 01171900 we were not able to validate critical information.
During our review of the documents provided to document the University’s compliance with the Act we noted that a qualified person did not prepare and present a written report to the board of directors at least annually to address the overall status of compliance with the information security program.
During our review of the Fiscal Operations Report and Application to Participate (FISAP) for the applications to participate for the 2022-2023 and 2021-2022 award years for OPEIDs 00394100, 02587500, and 01171900 we were not able to validate critical information.
During our review of the documents provided to document the University’s compliance with the Act we noted that a qualified person did not prepare and present a written report to the board of directors at least annually to address the overall status of compliance with the information security program.
During our analysis of the transactions recorded in the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards for the Student Financial Aid Program, we identified 177 transactions that were returns to the Department of Education in excess of 240 days.
In testing compliance with the return of Title IV funds requirements, we made a selection of eighty-three (83) students who withdrew, dropped-out, or failed to attend to the University and noted that for five (5) students, the amount returned was not calculated correctly.
In addition, we also noted that seven students did not have the correct number of days in the enrollment period.
There were also three students that had debts from prior semesters included in their computation of institutional charges.
In testing compliance with the Enrollment Reporting requirements, we selected seventy-eight (78) student who had a reduction or increase in attendance levels impacting enrollment status, graduated, withdrew, dropped out, or enrolled but never attended and noted that seven (6) had their changes reported more than 60 days.
Of the six (6), three of the students had the wrong date of withdrawal submitted to NSLDS.
Of the six (6), two (2) of the students had loans and the change was not submitted in its next updated Enrollment Reporting Roster file.
During our review of the documents provided to document the University’s compliance with the Act we noted that a qualified person did not prepare and present a written report to the board of directors at least annually to address the overall status of compliance with the information security program.
During our analysis of the transactions recorded in the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards for the Student Financial Aid Program, we identified 177 transactions that were returns to the Department of Education in excess of 240 days.
In testing compliance with the return of Title IV funds requirements, we made a selection of eighty-three (83) students who withdrew, dropped-out, or failed to attend to the University and noted that for five (5) students, the amount returned was not calculated correctly.
In addition, we also noted that seven students did not have the correct number of days in the enrollment period.
There were also three students that had debts from prior semesters included in their computation of institutional charges.
In testing compliance with the Enrollment Reporting requirements, we selected seventy-eight (78) student who had a reduction or increase in attendance levels impacting enrollment status, graduated, withdrew, dropped out, or enrolled but never attended and noted that seven (6) had their changes reported more than 60 days.
Of the six (6), three of the students had the wrong date of withdrawal submitted to NSLDS.
Of the six (6), two (2) of the students had loans and the change was not submitted in its next updated Enrollment Reporting Roster file.
During our review of the documents provided to document the University’s compliance with the Act we noted that a qualified person did not prepare and present a written report to the board of directors at least annually to address the overall status of compliance with the information security program.
During our analysis of the transactions recorded in the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards for the Student Financial Aid Program, we identified 177 transactions that were returns to the Department of Education in excess of 240 days.
During our review of the documents provided to document the University’s compliance with the Act we noted that a qualified person did not prepare and present a written report to the board of directors at least annually to address the overall status of compliance with the information security program.
During our review of the sample selected to physically inspect the equipment and determine that it was adequately safeguarded we were not able to inspect one out of forty samples selected.
During our review of the Fiscal Operations Report and Application to Participate (FISAP) for the applications to participate for the 2022-2023 and 2021-2022 award years for OPEIDs 00394100, 02587500, and 01171900 we were not able to validate critical information.
During our review of the documents provided to document the University’s compliance with the Act we noted that a qualified person did not prepare and present a written report to the board of directors at least annually to address the overall status of compliance with the information security program.
During our review of the Fiscal Operations Report and Application to Participate (FISAP) for the applications to participate for the 2022-2023 and 2021-2022 award years for OPEIDs 00394100, 02587500, and 01171900 we were not able to validate critical information.
During our review of the documents provided to document the University’s compliance with the Act we noted that a qualified person did not prepare and present a written report to the board of directors at least annually to address the overall status of compliance with the information security program.
During our analysis of the transactions recorded in the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards for the Student Financial Aid Program, we identified 177 transactions that were returns to the Department of Education in excess of 240 days.
In testing compliance with the return of Title IV funds requirements, we made a selection of eighty-three (83) students who withdrew, dropped-out, or failed to attend to the University and noted that for five (5) students, the amount returned was not calculated correctly.
In addition, we also noted that seven students did not have the correct number of days in the enrollment period.
There were also three students that had debts from prior semesters included in their computation of institutional charges.
In testing compliance with the Enrollment Reporting requirements, we selected seventy-eight (78) student who had a reduction or increase in attendance levels impacting enrollment status, graduated, withdrew, dropped out, or enrolled but never attended and noted that seven (6) had their changes reported more than 60 days.
Of the six (6), three of the students had the wrong date of withdrawal submitted to NSLDS.
Of the six (6), two (2) of the students had loans and the change was not submitted in its next updated Enrollment Reporting Roster file.
During our review of the documents provided to document the University’s compliance with the Act we noted that a qualified person did not prepare and present a written report to the board of directors at least annually to address the overall status of compliance with the information security program.
During our analysis of the transactions recorded in the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards for the Student Financial Aid Program, we identified 177 transactions that were returns to the Department of Education in excess of 240 days.
In testing compliance with the return of Title IV funds requirements, we made a selection of eighty-three (83) students who withdrew, dropped-out, or failed to attend to the University and noted that for five (5) students, the amount returned was not calculated correctly.
In addition, we also noted that seven students did not have the correct number of days in the enrollment period.
There were also three students that had debts from prior semesters included in their computation of institutional charges.
In testing compliance with the Enrollment Reporting requirements, we selected seventy-eight (78) student who had a reduction or increase in attendance levels impacting enrollment status, graduated, withdrew, dropped out, or enrolled but never attended and noted that seven (6) had their changes reported more than 60 days.
Of the six (6), three of the students had the wrong date of withdrawal submitted to NSLDS.
Of the six (6), two (2) of the students had loans and the change was not submitted in its next updated Enrollment Reporting Roster file.
During our review of the documents provided to document the University’s compliance with the Act we noted that a qualified person did not prepare and present a written report to the board of directors at least annually to address the overall status of compliance with the information security program.
During our analysis of the transactions recorded in the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards for the Student Financial Aid Program, we identified 177 transactions that were returns to the Department of Education in excess of 240 days.
During our review of the documents provided to document the University’s compliance with the Act we noted that a qualified person did not prepare and present a written report to the board of directors at least annually to address the overall status of compliance with the information security program.
During our review of the sample selected to physically inspect the equipment and determine that it was adequately safeguarded we were not able to inspect one out of forty samples selected.