See Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs for chart/table 2022-001: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Criteria: Per 2 CFR 200.318(i), the non-Federal entity must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include, but are not necessarily limited to, the following: the rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price. Per 2 CFR 200.214, non-Federal entities are subject to the nonprocurement debarment and suspension regulations implementing Executive Orders 12549 and 12689, 2 CFR Part 180. The regulations in 2 CFR Part 180 restrict awards, sub-awards, and contracts with certain parties that are debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded from, or ineligible for, participation in Federal Assistance programs or activities. Per 2 CFR 180.220, non-Federal entities are prohibited from contracting with or making sub-awards under covered transactions to parties that are suspended or debarred or whose principals are suspended or debarred. Covered transactions include contracts for goods and services awarded under a nonprocurement transaction that are expected to equal or exceed $25,000 or meet certain other criteria as specified in 2 CFR Section 180.220. All nonprocurement transactions entered into by a pass-through entity (i.e., sub-awards to subrecipients), irrespective of award amount, are considered covered transactions unless they are exempt as provided in 2 CFR Section 180.215. Condition/context: Five transactions were subject to the requirements of procurement based on the transaction price. Of the three transactions tested during the audit, all three were identified as not having the proper documentation supporting the procurement method. Five vendors were subject to the requirements of suspension and debarment. Of the three vendors tested during the audit, all three were identified as not having the proper documentation supporting the review of the suspension and debarment requirements prior to funds being expended. None of the entities were suspended or debarred. Questioned costs: $0 Cause: While the College has a procurement policy in place that appropriately addresses procurement, suspension and debarment, the policy was not properly followed, resulting in a lack of supporting documentation for the procurement and review of the suspension and debarment of vendors in the fiscal year. When the pandemic originally began, exceptions from competitive procurement requirements of the Uniform Guidance could be accepted if a public emergency would not permit a delay; however, the flexibility from competitive procurement has been reduced as it is unlikely the same circumstances would be occurring. The College was still operating under this previous flexibility and utilized prior vendors through sole source contracts. Effect: Per 2 CFR 200.339, if a non-Federal entity fails to comply with the U.S. Constitution, Federal statutes, regulations, or the terms and conditions of a Federal award, the Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity may impose additional conditions, as described in ? 200.208. If the Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity determines that noncompliance cannot be remedied by imposing additional conditions, the Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity may take one or more of the following actions, as appropriate in the circumstances: (a) Temporarily withhold cash payments pending correction of the deficiency by the non-Federal entity or more severe enforcement action by the Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity. (b) Disallow (that is, deny both use of funds and any applicable matching credit for) all or part of the cost of the activity or action not in compliance. (c) Wholly or partly suspend or terminate the Federal award. (d) Initiate suspension or debarment proceedings as authorized under 2 CFR Part 180 and Federal awarding agency regulations (or in the case of a pass-through entity, recommend such a proceeding be initiated by a Federal awarding agency). (e) Withhold further Federal awards for the project or program. (f) Take other remedies that may be legally available. Identification as a repeat finding: No. Recommendation: We recommend that management ensure it is staying updated with changes in guidance and program requirements. In addition, for more consistent application, we recommend that the procurement policy be modified to more clearly state that documentation will be maintained to identify and maintain proper supporting documentation for the method of procurement utilized and for the review of the suspension and debarment requirement. Furthermore, we recommend that the procurement policy be modified to more clearly state vendors with a transaction, in the aggregate, greater than the micro-purchase threshold are required to be procured under approved procurement methods. Views of responsible officials and planned corrective actions: Management concurs with the finding. See Exhibit I.
See Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs for chart/table 2022-001: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Criteria: Per 2 CFR 200.318(i), the non-Federal entity must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include, but are not necessarily limited to, the following: the rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price. Per 2 CFR 200.214, non-Federal entities are subject to the nonprocurement debarment and suspension regulations implementing Executive Orders 12549 and 12689, 2 CFR Part 180. The regulations in 2 CFR Part 180 restrict awards, sub-awards, and contracts with certain parties that are debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded from, or ineligible for, participation in Federal Assistance programs or activities. Per 2 CFR 180.220, non-Federal entities are prohibited from contracting with or making sub-awards under covered transactions to parties that are suspended or debarred or whose principals are suspended or debarred. Covered transactions include contracts for goods and services awarded under a nonprocurement transaction that are expected to equal or exceed $25,000 or meet certain other criteria as specified in 2 CFR Section 180.220. All nonprocurement transactions entered into by a pass-through entity (i.e., sub-awards to subrecipients), irrespective of award amount, are considered covered transactions unless they are exempt as provided in 2 CFR Section 180.215. Condition/context: Five transactions were subject to the requirements of procurement based on the transaction price. Of the three transactions tested during the audit, all three were identified as not having the proper documentation supporting the procurement method. Five vendors were subject to the requirements of suspension and debarment. Of the three vendors tested during the audit, all three were identified as not having the proper documentation supporting the review of the suspension and debarment requirements prior to funds being expended. None of the entities were suspended or debarred. Questioned costs: $0 Cause: While the College has a procurement policy in place that appropriately addresses procurement, suspension and debarment, the policy was not properly followed, resulting in a lack of supporting documentation for the procurement and review of the suspension and debarment of vendors in the fiscal year. When the pandemic originally began, exceptions from competitive procurement requirements of the Uniform Guidance could be accepted if a public emergency would not permit a delay; however, the flexibility from competitive procurement has been reduced as it is unlikely the same circumstances would be occurring. The College was still operating under this previous flexibility and utilized prior vendors through sole source contracts. Effect: Per 2 CFR 200.339, if a non-Federal entity fails to comply with the U.S. Constitution, Federal statutes, regulations, or the terms and conditions of a Federal award, the Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity may impose additional conditions, as described in ? 200.208. If the Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity determines that noncompliance cannot be remedied by imposing additional conditions, the Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity may take one or more of the following actions, as appropriate in the circumstances: (a) Temporarily withhold cash payments pending correction of the deficiency by the non-Federal entity or more severe enforcement action by the Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity. (b) Disallow (that is, deny both use of funds and any applicable matching credit for) all or part of the cost of the activity or action not in compliance. (c) Wholly or partly suspend or terminate the Federal award. (d) Initiate suspension or debarment proceedings as authorized under 2 CFR Part 180 and Federal awarding agency regulations (or in the case of a pass-through entity, recommend such a proceeding be initiated by a Federal awarding agency). (e) Withhold further Federal awards for the project or program. (f) Take other remedies that may be legally available. Identification as a repeat finding: No. Recommendation: We recommend that management ensure it is staying updated with changes in guidance and program requirements. In addition, for more consistent application, we recommend that the procurement policy be modified to more clearly state that documentation will be maintained to identify and maintain proper supporting documentation for the method of procurement utilized and for the review of the suspension and debarment requirement. Furthermore, we recommend that the procurement policy be modified to more clearly state vendors with a transaction, in the aggregate, greater than the micro-purchase threshold are required to be procured under approved procurement methods. Views of responsible officials and planned corrective actions: Management concurs with the finding. See Exhibit I.
See Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs for chart/table 2022-001: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Criteria: Per 2 CFR 200.318(i), the non-Federal entity must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include, but are not necessarily limited to, the following: the rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price. Per 2 CFR 200.214, non-Federal entities are subject to the nonprocurement debarment and suspension regulations implementing Executive Orders 12549 and 12689, 2 CFR Part 180. The regulations in 2 CFR Part 180 restrict awards, sub-awards, and contracts with certain parties that are debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded from, or ineligible for, participation in Federal Assistance programs or activities. Per 2 CFR 180.220, non-Federal entities are prohibited from contracting with or making sub-awards under covered transactions to parties that are suspended or debarred or whose principals are suspended or debarred. Covered transactions include contracts for goods and services awarded under a nonprocurement transaction that are expected to equal or exceed $25,000 or meet certain other criteria as specified in 2 CFR Section 180.220. All nonprocurement transactions entered into by a pass-through entity (i.e., sub-awards to subrecipients), irrespective of award amount, are considered covered transactions unless they are exempt as provided in 2 CFR Section 180.215. Condition/context: Five transactions were subject to the requirements of procurement based on the transaction price. Of the three transactions tested during the audit, all three were identified as not having the proper documentation supporting the procurement method. Five vendors were subject to the requirements of suspension and debarment. Of the three vendors tested during the audit, all three were identified as not having the proper documentation supporting the review of the suspension and debarment requirements prior to funds being expended. None of the entities were suspended or debarred. Questioned costs: $0 Cause: While the College has a procurement policy in place that appropriately addresses procurement, suspension and debarment, the policy was not properly followed, resulting in a lack of supporting documentation for the procurement and review of the suspension and debarment of vendors in the fiscal year. When the pandemic originally began, exceptions from competitive procurement requirements of the Uniform Guidance could be accepted if a public emergency would not permit a delay; however, the flexibility from competitive procurement has been reduced as it is unlikely the same circumstances would be occurring. The College was still operating under this previous flexibility and utilized prior vendors through sole source contracts. Effect: Per 2 CFR 200.339, if a non-Federal entity fails to comply with the U.S. Constitution, Federal statutes, regulations, or the terms and conditions of a Federal award, the Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity may impose additional conditions, as described in ? 200.208. If the Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity determines that noncompliance cannot be remedied by imposing additional conditions, the Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity may take one or more of the following actions, as appropriate in the circumstances: (a) Temporarily withhold cash payments pending correction of the deficiency by the non-Federal entity or more severe enforcement action by the Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity. (b) Disallow (that is, deny both use of funds and any applicable matching credit for) all or part of the cost of the activity or action not in compliance. (c) Wholly or partly suspend or terminate the Federal award. (d) Initiate suspension or debarment proceedings as authorized under 2 CFR Part 180 and Federal awarding agency regulations (or in the case of a pass-through entity, recommend such a proceeding be initiated by a Federal awarding agency). (e) Withhold further Federal awards for the project or program. (f) Take other remedies that may be legally available. Identification as a repeat finding: No. Recommendation: We recommend that management ensure it is staying updated with changes in guidance and program requirements. In addition, for more consistent application, we recommend that the procurement policy be modified to more clearly state that documentation will be maintained to identify and maintain proper supporting documentation for the method of procurement utilized and for the review of the suspension and debarment requirement. Furthermore, we recommend that the procurement policy be modified to more clearly state vendors with a transaction, in the aggregate, greater than the micro-purchase threshold are required to be procured under approved procurement methods. Views of responsible officials and planned corrective actions: Management concurs with the finding. See Exhibit I.
See Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs for chart/table 2022-001: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Criteria: Per 2 CFR 200.318(i), the non-Federal entity must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include, but are not necessarily limited to, the following: the rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price. Per 2 CFR 200.214, non-Federal entities are subject to the nonprocurement debarment and suspension regulations implementing Executive Orders 12549 and 12689, 2 CFR Part 180. The regulations in 2 CFR Part 180 restrict awards, sub-awards, and contracts with certain parties that are debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded from, or ineligible for, participation in Federal Assistance programs or activities. Per 2 CFR 180.220, non-Federal entities are prohibited from contracting with or making sub-awards under covered transactions to parties that are suspended or debarred or whose principals are suspended or debarred. Covered transactions include contracts for goods and services awarded under a nonprocurement transaction that are expected to equal or exceed $25,000 or meet certain other criteria as specified in 2 CFR Section 180.220. All nonprocurement transactions entered into by a pass-through entity (i.e., sub-awards to subrecipients), irrespective of award amount, are considered covered transactions unless they are exempt as provided in 2 CFR Section 180.215. Condition/context: Five transactions were subject to the requirements of procurement based on the transaction price. Of the three transactions tested during the audit, all three were identified as not having the proper documentation supporting the procurement method. Five vendors were subject to the requirements of suspension and debarment. Of the three vendors tested during the audit, all three were identified as not having the proper documentation supporting the review of the suspension and debarment requirements prior to funds being expended. None of the entities were suspended or debarred. Questioned costs: $0 Cause: While the College has a procurement policy in place that appropriately addresses procurement, suspension and debarment, the policy was not properly followed, resulting in a lack of supporting documentation for the procurement and review of the suspension and debarment of vendors in the fiscal year. When the pandemic originally began, exceptions from competitive procurement requirements of the Uniform Guidance could be accepted if a public emergency would not permit a delay; however, the flexibility from competitive procurement has been reduced as it is unlikely the same circumstances would be occurring. The College was still operating under this previous flexibility and utilized prior vendors through sole source contracts. Effect: Per 2 CFR 200.339, if a non-Federal entity fails to comply with the U.S. Constitution, Federal statutes, regulations, or the terms and conditions of a Federal award, the Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity may impose additional conditions, as described in ? 200.208. If the Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity determines that noncompliance cannot be remedied by imposing additional conditions, the Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity may take one or more of the following actions, as appropriate in the circumstances: (a) Temporarily withhold cash payments pending correction of the deficiency by the non-Federal entity or more severe enforcement action by the Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity. (b) Disallow (that is, deny both use of funds and any applicable matching credit for) all or part of the cost of the activity or action not in compliance. (c) Wholly or partly suspend or terminate the Federal award. (d) Initiate suspension or debarment proceedings as authorized under 2 CFR Part 180 and Federal awarding agency regulations (or in the case of a pass-through entity, recommend such a proceeding be initiated by a Federal awarding agency). (e) Withhold further Federal awards for the project or program. (f) Take other remedies that may be legally available. Identification as a repeat finding: No. Recommendation: We recommend that management ensure it is staying updated with changes in guidance and program requirements. In addition, for more consistent application, we recommend that the procurement policy be modified to more clearly state that documentation will be maintained to identify and maintain proper supporting documentation for the method of procurement utilized and for the review of the suspension and debarment requirement. Furthermore, we recommend that the procurement policy be modified to more clearly state vendors with a transaction, in the aggregate, greater than the micro-purchase threshold are required to be procured under approved procurement methods. Views of responsible officials and planned corrective actions: Management concurs with the finding. See Exhibit I.