Audit 299949

FY End
2023-06-30
Total Expended
$8.67M
Findings
2
Programs
13
Year: 2023 Accepted: 2024-03-28
Auditor: Auditor General

Organization Exclusion Status:

Checking exclusion status...

Findings

ID Ref Severity Repeat Requirement
388132 2023-005 Significant Deficiency - N
964574 2023-005 Significant Deficiency - N

Contacts

Name Title Type
SMJGAK2GAF25 Alethea Geiger Auditee
3524633206 Edward Waller, CPA Auditor
No contacts on file

Notes to SEFA

Title: Basis of Presentation Accounting Policies: Note 1 and 2 De Minimis Rate Used: N Rate Explanation: Note 3 The accompanying Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (Schedule) includes the Federal award activity of the Gilchrist County District School Board under programs of the Federal Government for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. The information in this Schedule is presented in accordance with the requirements of Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance). Because the Schedule presents only a selected portion of the operations of the District, it is not intended to and does not present the financial position or changes in net position of the District.
Title: Summary of Significant Accounting Policies Accounting Policies: Note 1 and 2 De Minimis Rate Used: N Rate Explanation: Note 3 Expenditures reported on the Schedule are reported on the modified accrual basis of accounting. Such expenditures are recognized following the cost principles contained in the Uniform Guidance, wherein certain types of expenditures are not allowable or are limited as to reimbursement.
Title: Indirect Cost Rate Accounting Policies: Note 1 and 2 De Minimis Rate Used: N Rate Explanation: Note 3 The District has not elected to use the 10 percent de minimis cost rate allowed under the Uniform Guidance.
Title: Noncash Assistance - National School Lunch Program Accounting Policies: Note 1 and 2 De Minimis Rate Used: N Rate Explanation: Note 3 Includes $214,226.43 of donated food received during the fiscal year. Donated foods are valued at fair value as determined at the time of the donation.

Finding Details

Finding - District controls did not always ensure compliance with the Davis-Bacon Act for Federally funded construction projects exceeding $2,000, resulting in questioned costs totaling $120,795. Criteria - The ES Fund provides Federal funds for school facility repairs and improvements. Title 29, Section 5.5, Code of Federal Regulations (Davis-Bacon Act), requires the District to include prevailing wage rate clauses in any construction contract exceeding $2,000 that is financed either wholly or in part by Federal funds and ensure that contractors pay workers the prevailing wage rates established by the United States Department of Labor. This includes a requirement for the contractor to submit to the District weekly, for each week in which any contract work is performed, a copy of the payroll and a statement of compliance (certified payrolls). The United States Department of Labor established “prevailing wages” by geographic area and interprets the Davis Bacon Act to apply to construction, alteration, or repair of a public building or public work. Condition - For the 2022-23 fiscal year, the District expended ES Fund moneys totaling $3,967,101, including $120,795 for three construction contracts related to heating, ventilation, and air-conditioning replacements and remodeling renovations. While the contracts included a general requirement to comply with Davis-Bacon Act provisions, the contracts did not explicitly require, and the contractors did not submit, weekly certified payrolls to the District demonstrating prevailing wage rates were paid. Cause - District personnel indicated that they were not aware that the Davis Bacon Act applied to these Federally funded projects and, therefore, did not include the appropriate wage rate clauses in the applicable procurement documents. Effect - Absent specific contract clauses and weekly certified payrolls, there is an increased risk that construction contractors paid with Federal moneys will not pay workers the prevailing wage rates established by the United States Department of Labor. Although we requested, the District did not provide certified payrolls from the contractors demonstrating that the prevailing wage rates were paid for the services, resulting in questioned costs totaling $120,795. Recommendation - The District should enhance procedures to ensure compliance with all Davis-Bacon Act requirements. Such enhancements should ensure that applicable Federally funded facility contracts require submittal of weekly certified payrolls and that District personnel verify the payrolls were received. In addition, the District should document to the FDOE the allowability of the questioned costs or contact the FDOE regarding necessary corrective action. District Response - Vendors cited for the 22-23 fiscal year have been solicited for wage records as per the Davis-Bacon act. Once they have been provided, they will be issued to the State Auditors General's Office. All future projects occurring on Federal Funds in the amount of $2,000 or more will require copies of the prevailing wage records by vendors.
Finding - District controls did not always ensure compliance with the Davis-Bacon Act for Federally funded construction projects exceeding $2,000, resulting in questioned costs totaling $120,795. Criteria - The ES Fund provides Federal funds for school facility repairs and improvements. Title 29, Section 5.5, Code of Federal Regulations (Davis-Bacon Act), requires the District to include prevailing wage rate clauses in any construction contract exceeding $2,000 that is financed either wholly or in part by Federal funds and ensure that contractors pay workers the prevailing wage rates established by the United States Department of Labor. This includes a requirement for the contractor to submit to the District weekly, for each week in which any contract work is performed, a copy of the payroll and a statement of compliance (certified payrolls). The United States Department of Labor established “prevailing wages” by geographic area and interprets the Davis Bacon Act to apply to construction, alteration, or repair of a public building or public work. Condition - For the 2022-23 fiscal year, the District expended ES Fund moneys totaling $3,967,101, including $120,795 for three construction contracts related to heating, ventilation, and air-conditioning replacements and remodeling renovations. While the contracts included a general requirement to comply with Davis-Bacon Act provisions, the contracts did not explicitly require, and the contractors did not submit, weekly certified payrolls to the District demonstrating prevailing wage rates were paid. Cause - District personnel indicated that they were not aware that the Davis Bacon Act applied to these Federally funded projects and, therefore, did not include the appropriate wage rate clauses in the applicable procurement documents. Effect - Absent specific contract clauses and weekly certified payrolls, there is an increased risk that construction contractors paid with Federal moneys will not pay workers the prevailing wage rates established by the United States Department of Labor. Although we requested, the District did not provide certified payrolls from the contractors demonstrating that the prevailing wage rates were paid for the services, resulting in questioned costs totaling $120,795. Recommendation - The District should enhance procedures to ensure compliance with all Davis-Bacon Act requirements. Such enhancements should ensure that applicable Federally funded facility contracts require submittal of weekly certified payrolls and that District personnel verify the payrolls were received. In addition, the District should document to the FDOE the allowability of the questioned costs or contact the FDOE regarding necessary corrective action. District Response - Vendors cited for the 22-23 fiscal year have been solicited for wage records as per the Davis-Bacon act. Once they have been provided, they will be issued to the State Auditors General's Office. All future projects occurring on Federal Funds in the amount of $2,000 or more will require copies of the prevailing wage records by vendors.