SEGREGATION OF DUTIES
Criteria: Duties should be segregated to provide reasonable assurance that transactions are handled appropriately.
Condition: There is a lack of segregation of duties among personnel.
Cause: There are a limited number of personnel for certain functions.
Effect: Transactions could be mishandled.
Recommendation: The duties should be separated as much as possible, and alternative controls should be used to compensate for lack of separation. The governing board should provide some of these controls.
Views of responsible officials and planned corrective action: The government agrees with this finding and will adhere to the attached corrective action plan.
SEGREGATION OF DUTIES
Criteria: Duties should be segregated to provide reasonable assurance that transactions are handled appropriately.
Condition: There is a lack of segregation of duties among personnel.
Cause: There are a limited number of personnel for certain functions.
Effect: Transactions could be mishandled.
Recommendation: The duties should be separated as much as possible, and alternative controls should be used to compensate for lack of separation. The governing board should provide some of these controls.
Views of responsible officials and planned corrective action: The government agrees with this finding and will adhere to the attached corrective action plan.
AUDITOR PREPARED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Criteria: As part of its internal control structure, it is the government’s responsibility to prepare its financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP).
Condition: The government does not have the expertise to prepare or evaluate the selection and application of accounting principles and resulting disclosures and presentations within the auditor prepared financial statements.
Cause: The government is a small organization with limited resources.
Effect: It is common for a small organization to rely on the audit firm to prepare the financial statements; however, an audit firm cannot be considered part of the government’s internal control by professional standards currently in effect. Since some presentations and disclosures may be material to the financial statements, this weakness in internal control would be classified as material.
Recommendation: While it may not be cost effective to do so, we recommend the government consider hiring a qualified person to evaluate the auditor prepared financial statements.
Views of responsible officials and planned corrective action: The government agrees with this finding and will adhere to the attached corrective action plan.
AUDITOR PREPARED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Criteria: As part of its internal control structure, it is the government’s responsibility to prepare its financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP).
Condition: The government does not have the expertise to prepare or evaluate the selection and application of accounting principles and resulting disclosures and presentations within the auditor prepared financial statements.
Cause: The government is a small organization with limited resources.
Effect: It is common for a small organization to rely on the audit firm to prepare the financial statements; however, an audit firm cannot be considered part of the government’s internal control by professional standards currently in effect. Since some presentations and disclosures may be material to the financial statements, this weakness in internal control would be classified as material.
Recommendation: While it may not be cost effective to do so, we recommend the government consider hiring a qualified person to evaluate the auditor prepared financial statements.
Views of responsible officials and planned corrective action: The government agrees with this finding and will adhere to the attached corrective action plan.
AUDITOR PREPARED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Criteria: As part of its internal control structure, it is the government’s responsibility to prepare its financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP).
Condition: The government does not have the expertise to prepare or evaluate the selection and application of accounting principles and resulting disclosures and presentations within the auditor prepared financial statements.
Cause: The government is a small organization with limited resources.
Effect: It is common for a small organization to rely on the audit firm to prepare the financial statements; however, an audit firm cannot be considered part of the government’s internal control by professional standards currently in effect. Since some presentations and disclosures may be material to the financial statements, this weakness in internal control would be classified as material.
Recommendation: While it may not be cost effective to do so, we recommend the government consider hiring a qualified person to evaluate the auditor prepared financial statements.
Views of responsible officials and planned corrective action: The government agrees with this finding and will adhere to the attached corrective action plan.
AUDITOR PREPARED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Criteria: As part of its internal control structure, it is the government’s responsibility to prepare its financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP).
Condition: The government does not have the expertise to prepare or evaluate the selection and application of accounting principles and resulting disclosures and presentations within the auditor prepared financial statements.
Cause: The government is a small organization with limited resources.
Effect: It is common for a small organization to rely on the audit firm to prepare the financial statements; however, an audit firm cannot be considered part of the government’s internal control by professional standards currently in effect. Since some presentations and disclosures may be material to the financial statements, this weakness in internal control would be classified as material.
Recommendation: While it may not be cost effective to do so, we recommend the government consider hiring a qualified person to evaluate the auditor prepared financial statements.
Views of responsible officials and planned corrective action: The government agrees with this finding and will adhere to the attached corrective action plan.
21st CENTURY COMMUNITY LEARNING CENTERS: ALN 84.287; GRANT NO. 5609831723: GRANT PERIOD YEAR
ENDED JUNE 30, 2023Criteria: The Uniform Guidance in 2 CFR 200.77 defines "period of performance" as the time during which the non-Federal entity (grantee) may incur new obligations to carry out the work. When used in connection with a non-Federal entity’s use of funds under a Federal award, the term "obligations" "means orders placed for property and services, contracts and subawards made, and similar transactions during a given period that require payment by the non-Federal entity during the same or a future period.
Condition: The district charged expenditures to the program that were outside of the period of performance.
Cause: Responsible personnel misinterpreted the period of performance requirements.
Effect: Noncompliance with period of performance requirements .
Questioned Costs: $29,723.
Recommendation: The district should revisit the Education Department General Administrative Regulations (EDGAR) at 34 CFR 76.707, which provide a chart that specifies when obligations are considered made. Once reviewed, the district should develop formal policies and procedures to ensure compliance with the requirements. The policies and procedures should be documented and disseminated to all applicable personnel.
Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Action: The government agrees with this finding and will adhere to the attached corrective action plan.
SEGREGATION OF DUTIES
Criteria: Duties should be segregated to provide reasonable assurance that transactions are handled appropriately.
Condition: There is a lack of segregation of duties among personnel.
Cause: There are a limited number of personnel for certain functions.
Effect: Transactions could be mishandled.
Recommendation: The duties should be separated as much as possible, and alternative controls should be used to compensate for lack of separation. The governing board should provide some of these controls.
Views of responsible officials and planned corrective action: The government agrees with this finding and will adhere to the attached corrective action plan.
SEGREGATION OF DUTIES
Criteria: Duties should be segregated to provide reasonable assurance that transactions are handled appropriately.
Condition: There is a lack of segregation of duties among personnel.
Cause: There are a limited number of personnel for certain functions.
Effect: Transactions could be mishandled.
Recommendation: The duties should be separated as much as possible, and alternative controls should be used to compensate for lack of separation. The governing board should provide some of these controls.
Views of responsible officials and planned corrective action: The government agrees with this finding and will adhere to the attached corrective action plan.
AUDITOR PREPARED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Criteria: As part of its internal control structure, it is the government’s responsibility to prepare its financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP).
Condition: The government does not have the expertise to prepare or evaluate the selection and application of accounting principles and resulting disclosures and presentations within the auditor prepared financial statements.
Cause: The government is a small organization with limited resources.
Effect: It is common for a small organization to rely on the audit firm to prepare the financial statements; however, an audit firm cannot be considered part of the government’s internal control by professional standards currently in effect. Since some presentations and disclosures may be material to the financial statements, this weakness in internal control would be classified as material.
Recommendation: While it may not be cost effective to do so, we recommend the government consider hiring a qualified person to evaluate the auditor prepared financial statements.
Views of responsible officials and planned corrective action: The government agrees with this finding and will adhere to the attached corrective action plan.
AUDITOR PREPARED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Criteria: As part of its internal control structure, it is the government’s responsibility to prepare its financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP).
Condition: The government does not have the expertise to prepare or evaluate the selection and application of accounting principles and resulting disclosures and presentations within the auditor prepared financial statements.
Cause: The government is a small organization with limited resources.
Effect: It is common for a small organization to rely on the audit firm to prepare the financial statements; however, an audit firm cannot be considered part of the government’s internal control by professional standards currently in effect. Since some presentations and disclosures may be material to the financial statements, this weakness in internal control would be classified as material.
Recommendation: While it may not be cost effective to do so, we recommend the government consider hiring a qualified person to evaluate the auditor prepared financial statements.
Views of responsible officials and planned corrective action: The government agrees with this finding and will adhere to the attached corrective action plan.
AUDITOR PREPARED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Criteria: As part of its internal control structure, it is the government’s responsibility to prepare its financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP).
Condition: The government does not have the expertise to prepare or evaluate the selection and application of accounting principles and resulting disclosures and presentations within the auditor prepared financial statements.
Cause: The government is a small organization with limited resources.
Effect: It is common for a small organization to rely on the audit firm to prepare the financial statements; however, an audit firm cannot be considered part of the government’s internal control by professional standards currently in effect. Since some presentations and disclosures may be material to the financial statements, this weakness in internal control would be classified as material.
Recommendation: While it may not be cost effective to do so, we recommend the government consider hiring a qualified person to evaluate the auditor prepared financial statements.
Views of responsible officials and planned corrective action: The government agrees with this finding and will adhere to the attached corrective action plan.
AUDITOR PREPARED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Criteria: As part of its internal control structure, it is the government’s responsibility to prepare its financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP).
Condition: The government does not have the expertise to prepare or evaluate the selection and application of accounting principles and resulting disclosures and presentations within the auditor prepared financial statements.
Cause: The government is a small organization with limited resources.
Effect: It is common for a small organization to rely on the audit firm to prepare the financial statements; however, an audit firm cannot be considered part of the government’s internal control by professional standards currently in effect. Since some presentations and disclosures may be material to the financial statements, this weakness in internal control would be classified as material.
Recommendation: While it may not be cost effective to do so, we recommend the government consider hiring a qualified person to evaluate the auditor prepared financial statements.
Views of responsible officials and planned corrective action: The government agrees with this finding and will adhere to the attached corrective action plan.
21st CENTURY COMMUNITY LEARNING CENTERS: ALN 84.287; GRANT NO. 5609831723: GRANT PERIOD YEAR
ENDED JUNE 30, 2023Criteria: The Uniform Guidance in 2 CFR 200.77 defines "period of performance" as the time during which the non-Federal entity (grantee) may incur new obligations to carry out the work. When used in connection with a non-Federal entity’s use of funds under a Federal award, the term "obligations" "means orders placed for property and services, contracts and subawards made, and similar transactions during a given period that require payment by the non-Federal entity during the same or a future period.
Condition: The district charged expenditures to the program that were outside of the period of performance.
Cause: Responsible personnel misinterpreted the period of performance requirements.
Effect: Noncompliance with period of performance requirements .
Questioned Costs: $29,723.
Recommendation: The district should revisit the Education Department General Administrative Regulations (EDGAR) at 34 CFR 76.707, which provide a chart that specifies when obligations are considered made. Once reviewed, the district should develop formal policies and procedures to ensure compliance with the requirements. The policies and procedures should be documented and disseminated to all applicable personnel.
Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Action: The government agrees with this finding and will adhere to the attached corrective action plan.