Audit 295918

FY End
2023-06-30
Total Expended
$14.49M
Findings
4
Programs
8
Year: 2023 Accepted: 2024-03-19

Organization Exclusion Status:

Checking exclusion status...

Findings

ID Ref Severity Repeat Requirement
381194 2023-002 Material Weakness - N
381195 2023-002 Material Weakness - N
957636 2023-002 Material Weakness - N
957637 2023-002 Material Weakness - N

Programs

ALN Program Spent Major Findings
84.425 Education Stabilization Fund $4.52M Yes 1
84.010 Title I Grants to Local Educational Agencies $2.72M Yes 0
10.555 National School Lunch Program $1.96M - 0
84.027 Special Education_grants to States $468,255 - 0
84.282 Charter Schools $439,043 - 0
84.367 Improving Teacher Quality State Grants $317,853 - 0
84.424 Student Support and Academic Enrichment Program $143,783 - 0
84.031 Higher Education_institutional Aid $4,185 - 0

Contacts

Name Title Type
X1B8LFL1BAN5 Eva Spilker Auditee
4105983087 Kyla Greenhoe Auditor
No contacts on file

Notes to SEFA

Title: BASIS OF PRESENTATION Accounting Policies: The information in this Schedule is presented in accordance with the requirements of the Uniform Guidance. De Minimis Rate Used: N Rate Explanation: The Phalen Leadership Academy – Indiana, Inc. has elected not to use the 10 percent de minimus indirect cost rate to recover indirect costs as allowed under the Uniform Guidance. The accompanying schedule of expenditures of federal awards (Schedule) includes the federal grant activity of The Phalen Leadership Academy – Indiana, Inc. under programs of the federal government for the year ended June 30, 2023. The information in this Schedule is presented in accordance with the requirements of the Uniform Guidance. Because the Schedule presents only a selected portion of the operations of The Phalen Leadership Academy – Indiana, Inc., it is not intended to and does not present the financial position of The Phalen Leadership Academy – Indiana, Inc.
Title: SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES Accounting Policies: The information in this Schedule is presented in accordance with the requirements of the Uniform Guidance. De Minimis Rate Used: N Rate Explanation: The Phalen Leadership Academy – Indiana, Inc. has elected not to use the 10 percent de minimus indirect cost rate to recover indirect costs as allowed under the Uniform Guidance. Expenditures reported on the Schedule are reported on the accrual basis of accounting. Such expenditures are recognized following the cost principles contained in the Uniform Guidance for all awards. Under these principles, certain types of expenditures are not allowable or are limited as to reimbursement. Negative amounts shown on the Schedule represent adjustments or credits made in the normal course of business to amounts reported as expenditures in prior years. The Phalen Leadership Academy – Indiana, Inc. has elected not to use the 10 percent de minimus indirect cost rate to recover indirect costs as allowed under the Uniform Guidance.

Finding Details

2023 – 002: Special Tests and Provisions Federal Agency: U.S Department Education Federal Program Name: Education Stabilization Funds Assistance Listing Number: 84.425D, 84.425U Pass-Through Agency: Indiana Department of Education Pass-Through Numbers: S425D200013, S425D210013, S425U210013 Award Period: July 1, 2022 – June 30, 2023 Type of Finding: • Material Weakness in Internal Control over Compliance • Other Matters Criteria or specific requirement: Per 2 CFR 200.303, "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in ‘Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government’ issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the ‘Internal Control Integrated Framework’ issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). If governors, SEAs, and or subrecipients propose to use ESF funds for construction they must also comply with applicable requirements in 34 CFR section 76.600 and 34 CFR sections 75.600–617. Approved construction projects must comply with all other applicable Uniform Guidance requirements, as well as the ED’s regulations regarding construction, as applicable, at 34 CFR section 76.600. As is the case with all construction contracts using laborers and mechanics financed by federal education funds, recipients and subrecipients that use ESF funds for construction contracts over $2,000 must meet Davis-Bacon prevailing wage requirements. Condition: PLA did not verify compliance with prevailing wage requirements with subcontractors for construction projects financed by federal education funds. Questioned costs: $342,069. Context: 2 of 2 construction projects financed by federal education funds were subject to prevailing wage requirements. Cause: PLA was not familiar with using federal education funds for construction costs and were not aware of the prevailing wage requirements Effect: Laborers and mechanics paid by subcontractors may have been paid below prevailing wage rates. Repeat Finding: No. Recommendation: We recommend that for future construction contracts financed by federal education funds PLA verify that subcontractors comply with prevailing wage requirements. Views of responsible officials: There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
2023 – 002: Special Tests and Provisions Federal Agency: U.S Department Education Federal Program Name: Education Stabilization Funds Assistance Listing Number: 84.425D, 84.425U Pass-Through Agency: Indiana Department of Education Pass-Through Numbers: S425D200013, S425D210013, S425U210013 Award Period: July 1, 2022 – June 30, 2023 Type of Finding: • Material Weakness in Internal Control over Compliance • Other Matters Criteria or specific requirement: Per 2 CFR 200.303, "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in ‘Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government’ issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the ‘Internal Control Integrated Framework’ issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). If governors, SEAs, and or subrecipients propose to use ESF funds for construction they must also comply with applicable requirements in 34 CFR section 76.600 and 34 CFR sections 75.600–617. Approved construction projects must comply with all other applicable Uniform Guidance requirements, as well as the ED’s regulations regarding construction, as applicable, at 34 CFR section 76.600. As is the case with all construction contracts using laborers and mechanics financed by federal education funds, recipients and subrecipients that use ESF funds for construction contracts over $2,000 must meet Davis-Bacon prevailing wage requirements. Condition: PLA did not verify compliance with prevailing wage requirements with subcontractors for construction projects financed by federal education funds. Questioned costs: $342,069. Context: 2 of 2 construction projects financed by federal education funds were subject to prevailing wage requirements. Cause: PLA was not familiar with using federal education funds for construction costs and were not aware of the prevailing wage requirements Effect: Laborers and mechanics paid by subcontractors may have been paid below prevailing wage rates. Repeat Finding: No. Recommendation: We recommend that for future construction contracts financed by federal education funds PLA verify that subcontractors comply with prevailing wage requirements. Views of responsible officials: There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
2023 – 002: Special Tests and Provisions Federal Agency: U.S Department Education Federal Program Name: Education Stabilization Funds Assistance Listing Number: 84.425D, 84.425U Pass-Through Agency: Indiana Department of Education Pass-Through Numbers: S425D200013, S425D210013, S425U210013 Award Period: July 1, 2022 – June 30, 2023 Type of Finding: • Material Weakness in Internal Control over Compliance • Other Matters Criteria or specific requirement: Per 2 CFR 200.303, "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in ‘Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government’ issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the ‘Internal Control Integrated Framework’ issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). If governors, SEAs, and or subrecipients propose to use ESF funds for construction they must also comply with applicable requirements in 34 CFR section 76.600 and 34 CFR sections 75.600–617. Approved construction projects must comply with all other applicable Uniform Guidance requirements, as well as the ED’s regulations regarding construction, as applicable, at 34 CFR section 76.600. As is the case with all construction contracts using laborers and mechanics financed by federal education funds, recipients and subrecipients that use ESF funds for construction contracts over $2,000 must meet Davis-Bacon prevailing wage requirements. Condition: PLA did not verify compliance with prevailing wage requirements with subcontractors for construction projects financed by federal education funds. Questioned costs: $342,069. Context: 2 of 2 construction projects financed by federal education funds were subject to prevailing wage requirements. Cause: PLA was not familiar with using federal education funds for construction costs and were not aware of the prevailing wage requirements Effect: Laborers and mechanics paid by subcontractors may have been paid below prevailing wage rates. Repeat Finding: No. Recommendation: We recommend that for future construction contracts financed by federal education funds PLA verify that subcontractors comply with prevailing wage requirements. Views of responsible officials: There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
2023 – 002: Special Tests and Provisions Federal Agency: U.S Department Education Federal Program Name: Education Stabilization Funds Assistance Listing Number: 84.425D, 84.425U Pass-Through Agency: Indiana Department of Education Pass-Through Numbers: S425D200013, S425D210013, S425U210013 Award Period: July 1, 2022 – June 30, 2023 Type of Finding: • Material Weakness in Internal Control over Compliance • Other Matters Criteria or specific requirement: Per 2 CFR 200.303, "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in ‘Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government’ issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the ‘Internal Control Integrated Framework’ issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). If governors, SEAs, and or subrecipients propose to use ESF funds for construction they must also comply with applicable requirements in 34 CFR section 76.600 and 34 CFR sections 75.600–617. Approved construction projects must comply with all other applicable Uniform Guidance requirements, as well as the ED’s regulations regarding construction, as applicable, at 34 CFR section 76.600. As is the case with all construction contracts using laborers and mechanics financed by federal education funds, recipients and subrecipients that use ESF funds for construction contracts over $2,000 must meet Davis-Bacon prevailing wage requirements. Condition: PLA did not verify compliance with prevailing wage requirements with subcontractors for construction projects financed by federal education funds. Questioned costs: $342,069. Context: 2 of 2 construction projects financed by federal education funds were subject to prevailing wage requirements. Cause: PLA was not familiar with using federal education funds for construction costs and were not aware of the prevailing wage requirements Effect: Laborers and mechanics paid by subcontractors may have been paid below prevailing wage rates. Repeat Finding: No. Recommendation: We recommend that for future construction contracts financed by federal education funds PLA verify that subcontractors comply with prevailing wage requirements. Views of responsible officials: There is no disagreement with the audit finding.