FINDING 2023-002
Subject: Special Education Cluster - Earmarking
Federal Agency: Department of Education
Federal Program: Special Education Grants to States, Special Education Preschool Grants
Assistance Listings Numbers: 84.027, 84.173
Federal Award Numbers and Years: 20611-043-PN01, 21611-043-PN01, 21619-43-PN01
Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education
Compliance Requirements: Matching, Level of Effort, Earmarking
Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Modified Opinion
Repeat Finding
This is a repeat finding from the prior audit report. The prior audit finding number was 2021-001.
Condition and Context
The School Corporation is a member of the Northwest Indiana Special Education Cooperative
(Cooperative). During fiscal year 2021-2022, the Cooperative operated the special education programs
and spent the federal money on behalf of all its members. As the grant agreements were between the
Indiana Department of Education (IDOE) and each member school, the School Corporation was
responsible for ensuring and providing oversight of the Cooperative. However, there was inadequate
oversight performed by the School Corporation in order to ensure compliance with the Matching, Level of
Effort, Earmarking compliance requirement.
The School Corporation did not have internal controls in place to ensure that the Cooperative
complied with the earmarking requirements. The Cooperative did not have adequate procedures in place
to ensure that the required level of expenditures for non-public school students with disabilities was met for
each member school. The Cooperative did not have effective internal controls to ensure non-public school
expenditures were appropriately identified and reported.
The Non-Public Proportionate Share expenditures for the 20611-043-PN01, 21611-043-PN01, and
21619-43-PN01 grant awards could not be verified for the individual member schools. The non-public
school share funds for all member schools were comingled and the aggregate amount of expenditures was
then allocated to the member schools on a percentage basis. These allocations were the amounts reported
to the IDOE. As such, we were unable to identify which expenditures were for each school in order to verify
the minimum amount per the grant award was expended and properly reported to the IDOE as required.
The lack of internal controls and noncompliance were isolated to the 20611-043-PN01,
21611-043-PN01, and 21619-43-PN01 grant awards.
Criteria
2 CFR 200.303 states in part:
"The non-Federal entity must:
(a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides
reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance
with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award.
These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal
Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States
or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring
Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ."
2 CFR 200.403 states in part:
"Except where otherwise authorized by statute, costs must meet the following general criteria
in order to be allowable under Federal awards: . . .
(g) Be adequately documented. . . ."
2 CFR 200.208(b) states in part: "The Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity may adjust
specific Federal award conditions as needed . . ."
511 IAC 7-34-7(b) states:
"The public agency, in providing special education and related services to students in nonpublic
schools must expend at least an amount that is the same proportion of the public agency total
subgrant under 20 U.S.C. 1411(f) as the number of nonpublic school students with disabilities,
who are enrolled by their parents in nonpublic schools within its boundaries, is to the total
number of students with disabilities of the same age range."
Cause
A proper system of internal controls was not designed by management of the School Corporation.
Embedded within a properly designed and implemented internal control system should be internal controls
consisting of policies and procedures. Policies reflect the School Corporation's management statements
of what should be done to effect internal control, and procedures should consist of actions that would
implement these policies.
Effect
Without the proper implementation of an effectively designed system of internal controls, the
internal control system cannot be capable of effectively preventing, or detecting and correcting, material
noncompliance. As a result, it could not be determined if the School Corporation expended their required
non-public proportionate share.
Noncompliance with the provisions of federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of
the federal award could result in the loss of future federal funding to the School Corporation.
Questioned Costs
There were no questioned costs identified.
Recommendation
We recommended that management of the School Corporation establish a proper system of
internal controls and develop policies and procedures to ensure that the required non-public proportionate
share amounts are spent as required.
Views of Responsible Officials
For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
FINDING 2023-002
Subject: Special Education Cluster - Earmarking
Federal Agency: Department of Education
Federal Program: Special Education Grants to States, Special Education Preschool Grants
Assistance Listings Numbers: 84.027, 84.173
Federal Award Numbers and Years: 20611-043-PN01, 21611-043-PN01, 21619-43-PN01
Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education
Compliance Requirements: Matching, Level of Effort, Earmarking
Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Modified Opinion
Repeat Finding
This is a repeat finding from the prior audit report. The prior audit finding number was 2021-001.
Condition and Context
The School Corporation is a member of the Northwest Indiana Special Education Cooperative
(Cooperative). During fiscal year 2021-2022, the Cooperative operated the special education programs
and spent the federal money on behalf of all its members. As the grant agreements were between the
Indiana Department of Education (IDOE) and each member school, the School Corporation was
responsible for ensuring and providing oversight of the Cooperative. However, there was inadequate
oversight performed by the School Corporation in order to ensure compliance with the Matching, Level of
Effort, Earmarking compliance requirement.
The School Corporation did not have internal controls in place to ensure that the Cooperative
complied with the earmarking requirements. The Cooperative did not have adequate procedures in place
to ensure that the required level of expenditures for non-public school students with disabilities was met for
each member school. The Cooperative did not have effective internal controls to ensure non-public school
expenditures were appropriately identified and reported.
The Non-Public Proportionate Share expenditures for the 20611-043-PN01, 21611-043-PN01, and
21619-43-PN01 grant awards could not be verified for the individual member schools. The non-public
school share funds for all member schools were comingled and the aggregate amount of expenditures was
then allocated to the member schools on a percentage basis. These allocations were the amounts reported
to the IDOE. As such, we were unable to identify which expenditures were for each school in order to verify
the minimum amount per the grant award was expended and properly reported to the IDOE as required.
The lack of internal controls and noncompliance were isolated to the 20611-043-PN01,
21611-043-PN01, and 21619-43-PN01 grant awards.
Criteria
2 CFR 200.303 states in part:
"The non-Federal entity must:
(a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides
reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance
with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award.
These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal
Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States
or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring
Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ."
2 CFR 200.403 states in part:
"Except where otherwise authorized by statute, costs must meet the following general criteria
in order to be allowable under Federal awards: . . .
(g) Be adequately documented. . . ."
2 CFR 200.208(b) states in part: "The Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity may adjust
specific Federal award conditions as needed . . ."
511 IAC 7-34-7(b) states:
"The public agency, in providing special education and related services to students in nonpublic
schools must expend at least an amount that is the same proportion of the public agency total
subgrant under 20 U.S.C. 1411(f) as the number of nonpublic school students with disabilities,
who are enrolled by their parents in nonpublic schools within its boundaries, is to the total
number of students with disabilities of the same age range."
Cause
A proper system of internal controls was not designed by management of the School Corporation.
Embedded within a properly designed and implemented internal control system should be internal controls
consisting of policies and procedures. Policies reflect the School Corporation's management statements
of what should be done to effect internal control, and procedures should consist of actions that would
implement these policies.
Effect
Without the proper implementation of an effectively designed system of internal controls, the
internal control system cannot be capable of effectively preventing, or detecting and correcting, material
noncompliance. As a result, it could not be determined if the School Corporation expended their required
non-public proportionate share.
Noncompliance with the provisions of federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of
the federal award could result in the loss of future federal funding to the School Corporation.
Questioned Costs
There were no questioned costs identified.
Recommendation
We recommended that management of the School Corporation establish a proper system of
internal controls and develop policies and procedures to ensure that the required non-public proportionate
share amounts are spent as required.
Views of Responsible Officials
For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
FINDING 2023-003
Subject COVID-19 - Education Stabilization Fund - Special Tests
and Provisions - Wage Rate Requirements
Federal Agency: Department of Education
Federal Program: COVID-19 - Education Stabilization Fund
Assistance Listings Numbers: 84.425D, 84.425U
Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): S425D210013, S425U210013
Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education
Compliance Requirement: Special Tests and Provisions - Wage Rate Requirements
Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Modified Opinion
Condition and Context
Construction contracts in excess of $2,000 financed by federal assistance funds must pay wages
not less than those established for the locality of the project (prevailing wage rates) by the Department of
Labor (DOL) to their laborers and mechanics. Nonfederal entities are to include in their construction
contracts subject to the Wage Rate Requirements a provision that the contractor or subcontractor comply
with these requirements and the DOL regulations. This would include a requirement to submit a copy of
the payroll and statement of compliance to the entity for each week in which contract work was performed.
The School Corporation had not designed, nor implemented a system of internal controls to ensure
that construction contracts in excess of $2,000 paid from federal grant funds included a prevailing wage
rate clause. Two construction contracts, totaling $1,543,551 were paid from the COVID-19 - Education
Stabilization Fund grant funds during the audit period. Both contracts were tested; however, neither contract
contained the required prevailing wage rate clause. Certified payrolls were submitted by the contractor
for one of the contracts after the construction was completed for the contract which totaled $1,424,051;
however, certified payrolls could not be obtained for the contract which totaled $119,500.
The lack of internal controls and noncompliance were systemic issues throughout the audit period.
Criteria
2 CFR 200.303 states in part:
"The non-Federal entity must:
(a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides
reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance
with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award.
These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal
Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States
or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring
Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ."
29 CFR 5.5 states in part:
"(a) The Agency head shall cause or require the contracting officer to insert in full in any
contract in excess of $2,000 which is entered into for the actual construction, alteration and/or
repair, including painting and decorating, of a public building or public work, or building or work
financed in whole or in part from Federal funds or in accordance with guarantees of a Federal
agency or financed from funds obtained by pledge of any contract of a Federal agency to make
a loan, grant or annual contribution (except where a different meaning is expressly indicated),
and which is subject to the labor standards provisions of any of the acts listed in § 5.1, the
following clauses . . .
(1) Minimum wages.
(i) All laborers and mechanics employed or working upon the site of the work (or
under the United States Housing Act of 1937 or under the Housing Act of 1949
in the construction or development of the project), will be paid unconditionally
and not less often than once a week, and without subsequent deduction or
rebate on any account (except such payroll deductions as are permitted by
regulations issued by the Secretary of Labor under the Copeland Act (29 CFR
part 3)), the full amount of wages and bona fide fringe benefits (or cash
equivalents thereof) due at time of payment computed at rates not less than
those contained in the wage determination of the Secretary of Labor which is
attached hereto and made a part hereof, regardless of any contractual
relationship which may be alleged to exist between the contractor and such
laborers and mechanics. . . .
(3) Payrolls and basic records. . . .
(ii)
(A) The contractor shall submit weekly for each week in which any contract work is
performed a copy of all payrolls to the (write in name of appropriate federal agency)
if the agency is a party to the contract, but if the agency is not such a party, the
contractor will submit the payrolls to the applicant, sponsor, or owner, as the case
may be, for transmission to the (write in name of agency). . . ."
2 CFR 200 Appendix II states in part:
"In addition to other provisions required by the Federal agency or non-Federal entity; all
contracts made by the non-Federal entity under the Federal award must contain provisions
covering the following, as applicable. . . .
(D) Davis-Bacon Act, as amended (40 U.S.C. 3141-3148). When required by Federal
program legislation, all prime construction contracts in excess of $2,000 awarded by non-
Federal entities must include a provision for compliance with the Davis-Bacon Act (40
U.S.C. 3141-3144, and 3146-3148) as supplemented by Department of Labor regulations
(29 CFR Part 5, 'Labor Standards Provisions Applicable to Contracts Covering Federally
Financed and Assisted Construction'). In accordance with the statute, contractors must be
required to pay wages to laborers and mechanics at a rate not less than the prevailing
wages specified in a wage determination made by the Secretary of Labor. In addition,
contractors must be required to pay wages not less than once a week. . . ."
Cause
A proper system of internal controls was not designed by management of the School Corporation,
which would include segregation of key functions. Embedded within a properly designed and implemented
internal control system should be internal controls consisting of policies and procedures. Policies reflect
the School Corporation's management statements of what should be done to effect internal controls, and
procedures should consist of actions that would implement these policies.
Effect
Without the proper implementation of an effectively designed system of internal controls, the
internal control system cannot be capable of effectively preventing, or detecting and correcting, material
noncompliance. As a result, construction contracts entered into did not contain the required wage rate
requirements clauses nor were certified payrolls timely obtained by the School Corporation.
Noncompliance with the grant agreement and the compliance requirement could result in the loss
of future federal funds to the School Corporation.
Questioned Costs
There were no questioned costs identified.
Recommendation
We recommended that the School Corporation's management establish a system of internal controls
and include the wage rate requirement clause in construction contracts. In addition, certified payrolls
should be obtained as required.
Views of Responsible Officials
For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
FINDING 2023-004
Subject: COVID-19 - Education Stabilization Fund - Equipment and Real Property Management
Federal Agency: Department of Education
Federal Program: COVID-19 - Education Stabilization Fund
Assistance Listings Numbers: 84.425D, 84.425U
Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): S425D210013, S425U210013
Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education
Compliance Requirement: Equipment and Real Property Management
Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Modified Opinion
Condition and Context
The School Corporation paid $1,467,550 from the COVID-19 - Education Stabilization Fund
program for two improvement projects which exceeded the School Corporation's capitalization threshold.
The improvements were not added to the School Corporation's capital asset listing. Additionally, the School
Corporation completed a capital asset inventory as required; however, because material improvements
were not included in the capital asset listing, it was determined that the School Corporation did not reconcile
differences in the property records as required.
The lack of internal controls and noncompliance were systemic issues throughout the audit period.
Criteria
2 CFR 200.303 states in part:
"The non-Federal entity must:
(a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides
reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance
with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award.
These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal
Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States
or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring
Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ."
2 CFR 200.313(d) states in part:
"Management requirements. Procedures for managing equipment (including replacement
equipment), whether acquired in whole or in part under a Federal award, until disposition takes
place will, as a minimum, meet the following requirements:
(1) Property records must be maintained that include a description of the property, a serial
number or other identification number, the source of funding for the property (including
the FAIN), who holds title, the acquisition date, cost of the property, percentage of
federal participation in the project costs for the federal award under which the property
was acquired, the location, use and condition of the property, and any ultimate disposition
data including the date of disposal and sales price of the property.
(2) A physical inventory of the property must be taken and the results reconciled with the
property records at least once every two years. . . ."
Cause
A proper system of internal controls was not designed by management of the School Corporation,
which would include segregation of key functions. Embedded within a properly designed and implemented
internal control system should be internal controls consisting of policies and procedures. Policies reflect
the School Corporation's management statements of what should be done to effect internal controls, and
procedures should consist of actions that would implement these policies.
Effect
Without the proper implementation of an effectively designed system of internal controls, the
internal control system cannot be capable of effectively preventing, or detecting and correcting, material
noncompliance. As a result, improvements purchased were not properly added to the capital asset listing.
In addition, a reconcilement between the inventory records and the property records were not completed.
Noncompliance with the grant agreement and the compliance requirement could result in the loss
of federal funds to the School Corporation.
Questioned Costs
There were no questioned costs identified.
Recommendation
We recommended that management of the School Corporation establish a proper system of
internal controls and develop policies and procedures to ensure asset records include all assets.
Views of Responsible Officials
For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
FINDING 2023-003
Subject COVID-19 - Education Stabilization Fund - Special Tests
and Provisions - Wage Rate Requirements
Federal Agency: Department of Education
Federal Program: COVID-19 - Education Stabilization Fund
Assistance Listings Numbers: 84.425D, 84.425U
Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): S425D210013, S425U210013
Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education
Compliance Requirement: Special Tests and Provisions - Wage Rate Requirements
Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Modified Opinion
Condition and Context
Construction contracts in excess of $2,000 financed by federal assistance funds must pay wages
not less than those established for the locality of the project (prevailing wage rates) by the Department of
Labor (DOL) to their laborers and mechanics. Nonfederal entities are to include in their construction
contracts subject to the Wage Rate Requirements a provision that the contractor or subcontractor comply
with these requirements and the DOL regulations. This would include a requirement to submit a copy of
the payroll and statement of compliance to the entity for each week in which contract work was performed.
The School Corporation had not designed, nor implemented a system of internal controls to ensure
that construction contracts in excess of $2,000 paid from federal grant funds included a prevailing wage
rate clause. Two construction contracts, totaling $1,543,551 were paid from the COVID-19 - Education
Stabilization Fund grant funds during the audit period. Both contracts were tested; however, neither contract
contained the required prevailing wage rate clause. Certified payrolls were submitted by the contractor
for one of the contracts after the construction was completed for the contract which totaled $1,424,051;
however, certified payrolls could not be obtained for the contract which totaled $119,500.
The lack of internal controls and noncompliance were systemic issues throughout the audit period.
Criteria
2 CFR 200.303 states in part:
"The non-Federal entity must:
(a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides
reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance
with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award.
These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal
Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States
or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring
Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ."
29 CFR 5.5 states in part:
"(a) The Agency head shall cause or require the contracting officer to insert in full in any
contract in excess of $2,000 which is entered into for the actual construction, alteration and/or
repair, including painting and decorating, of a public building or public work, or building or work
financed in whole or in part from Federal funds or in accordance with guarantees of a Federal
agency or financed from funds obtained by pledge of any contract of a Federal agency to make
a loan, grant or annual contribution (except where a different meaning is expressly indicated),
and which is subject to the labor standards provisions of any of the acts listed in § 5.1, the
following clauses . . .
(1) Minimum wages.
(i) All laborers and mechanics employed or working upon the site of the work (or
under the United States Housing Act of 1937 or under the Housing Act of 1949
in the construction or development of the project), will be paid unconditionally
and not less often than once a week, and without subsequent deduction or
rebate on any account (except such payroll deductions as are permitted by
regulations issued by the Secretary of Labor under the Copeland Act (29 CFR
part 3)), the full amount of wages and bona fide fringe benefits (or cash
equivalents thereof) due at time of payment computed at rates not less than
those contained in the wage determination of the Secretary of Labor which is
attached hereto and made a part hereof, regardless of any contractual
relationship which may be alleged to exist between the contractor and such
laborers and mechanics. . . .
(3) Payrolls and basic records. . . .
(ii)
(A) The contractor shall submit weekly for each week in which any contract work is
performed a copy of all payrolls to the (write in name of appropriate federal agency)
if the agency is a party to the contract, but if the agency is not such a party, the
contractor will submit the payrolls to the applicant, sponsor, or owner, as the case
may be, for transmission to the (write in name of agency). . . ."
2 CFR 200 Appendix II states in part:
"In addition to other provisions required by the Federal agency or non-Federal entity; all
contracts made by the non-Federal entity under the Federal award must contain provisions
covering the following, as applicable. . . .
(D) Davis-Bacon Act, as amended (40 U.S.C. 3141-3148). When required by Federal
program legislation, all prime construction contracts in excess of $2,000 awarded by non-
Federal entities must include a provision for compliance with the Davis-Bacon Act (40
U.S.C. 3141-3144, and 3146-3148) as supplemented by Department of Labor regulations
(29 CFR Part 5, 'Labor Standards Provisions Applicable to Contracts Covering Federally
Financed and Assisted Construction'). In accordance with the statute, contractors must be
required to pay wages to laborers and mechanics at a rate not less than the prevailing
wages specified in a wage determination made by the Secretary of Labor. In addition,
contractors must be required to pay wages not less than once a week. . . ."
Cause
A proper system of internal controls was not designed by management of the School Corporation,
which would include segregation of key functions. Embedded within a properly designed and implemented
internal control system should be internal controls consisting of policies and procedures. Policies reflect
the School Corporation's management statements of what should be done to effect internal controls, and
procedures should consist of actions that would implement these policies.
Effect
Without the proper implementation of an effectively designed system of internal controls, the
internal control system cannot be capable of effectively preventing, or detecting and correcting, material
noncompliance. As a result, construction contracts entered into did not contain the required wage rate
requirements clauses nor were certified payrolls timely obtained by the School Corporation.
Noncompliance with the grant agreement and the compliance requirement could result in the loss
of future federal funds to the School Corporation.
Questioned Costs
There were no questioned costs identified.
Recommendation
We recommended that the School Corporation's management establish a system of internal controls
and include the wage rate requirement clause in construction contracts. In addition, certified payrolls
should be obtained as required.
Views of Responsible Officials
For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
FINDING 2023-004
Subject: COVID-19 - Education Stabilization Fund - Equipment and Real Property Management
Federal Agency: Department of Education
Federal Program: COVID-19 - Education Stabilization Fund
Assistance Listings Numbers: 84.425D, 84.425U
Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): S425D210013, S425U210013
Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education
Compliance Requirement: Equipment and Real Property Management
Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Modified Opinion
Condition and Context
The School Corporation paid $1,467,550 from the COVID-19 - Education Stabilization Fund
program for two improvement projects which exceeded the School Corporation's capitalization threshold.
The improvements were not added to the School Corporation's capital asset listing. Additionally, the School
Corporation completed a capital asset inventory as required; however, because material improvements
were not included in the capital asset listing, it was determined that the School Corporation did not reconcile
differences in the property records as required.
The lack of internal controls and noncompliance were systemic issues throughout the audit period.
Criteria
2 CFR 200.303 states in part:
"The non-Federal entity must:
(a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides
reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance
with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award.
These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal
Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States
or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring
Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ."
2 CFR 200.313(d) states in part:
"Management requirements. Procedures for managing equipment (including replacement
equipment), whether acquired in whole or in part under a Federal award, until disposition takes
place will, as a minimum, meet the following requirements:
(1) Property records must be maintained that include a description of the property, a serial
number or other identification number, the source of funding for the property (including
the FAIN), who holds title, the acquisition date, cost of the property, percentage of
federal participation in the project costs for the federal award under which the property
was acquired, the location, use and condition of the property, and any ultimate disposition
data including the date of disposal and sales price of the property.
(2) A physical inventory of the property must be taken and the results reconciled with the
property records at least once every two years. . . ."
Cause
A proper system of internal controls was not designed by management of the School Corporation,
which would include segregation of key functions. Embedded within a properly designed and implemented
internal control system should be internal controls consisting of policies and procedures. Policies reflect
the School Corporation's management statements of what should be done to effect internal controls, and
procedures should consist of actions that would implement these policies.
Effect
Without the proper implementation of an effectively designed system of internal controls, the
internal control system cannot be capable of effectively preventing, or detecting and correcting, material
noncompliance. As a result, improvements purchased were not properly added to the capital asset listing.
In addition, a reconcilement between the inventory records and the property records were not completed.
Noncompliance with the grant agreement and the compliance requirement could result in the loss
of federal funds to the School Corporation.
Questioned Costs
There were no questioned costs identified.
Recommendation
We recommended that management of the School Corporation establish a proper system of
internal controls and develop policies and procedures to ensure asset records include all assets.
Views of Responsible Officials
For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
FINDING 2023-003
Subject COVID-19 - Education Stabilization Fund - Special Tests
and Provisions - Wage Rate Requirements
Federal Agency: Department of Education
Federal Program: COVID-19 - Education Stabilization Fund
Assistance Listings Numbers: 84.425D, 84.425U
Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): S425D210013, S425U210013
Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education
Compliance Requirement: Special Tests and Provisions - Wage Rate Requirements
Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Modified Opinion
Condition and Context
Construction contracts in excess of $2,000 financed by federal assistance funds must pay wages
not less than those established for the locality of the project (prevailing wage rates) by the Department of
Labor (DOL) to their laborers and mechanics. Nonfederal entities are to include in their construction
contracts subject to the Wage Rate Requirements a provision that the contractor or subcontractor comply
with these requirements and the DOL regulations. This would include a requirement to submit a copy of
the payroll and statement of compliance to the entity for each week in which contract work was performed.
The School Corporation had not designed, nor implemented a system of internal controls to ensure
that construction contracts in excess of $2,000 paid from federal grant funds included a prevailing wage
rate clause. Two construction contracts, totaling $1,543,551 were paid from the COVID-19 - Education
Stabilization Fund grant funds during the audit period. Both contracts were tested; however, neither contract
contained the required prevailing wage rate clause. Certified payrolls were submitted by the contractor
for one of the contracts after the construction was completed for the contract which totaled $1,424,051;
however, certified payrolls could not be obtained for the contract which totaled $119,500.
The lack of internal controls and noncompliance were systemic issues throughout the audit period.
Criteria
2 CFR 200.303 states in part:
"The non-Federal entity must:
(a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides
reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance
with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award.
These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal
Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States
or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring
Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ."
29 CFR 5.5 states in part:
"(a) The Agency head shall cause or require the contracting officer to insert in full in any
contract in excess of $2,000 which is entered into for the actual construction, alteration and/or
repair, including painting and decorating, of a public building or public work, or building or work
financed in whole or in part from Federal funds or in accordance with guarantees of a Federal
agency or financed from funds obtained by pledge of any contract of a Federal agency to make
a loan, grant or annual contribution (except where a different meaning is expressly indicated),
and which is subject to the labor standards provisions of any of the acts listed in § 5.1, the
following clauses . . .
(1) Minimum wages.
(i) All laborers and mechanics employed or working upon the site of the work (or
under the United States Housing Act of 1937 or under the Housing Act of 1949
in the construction or development of the project), will be paid unconditionally
and not less often than once a week, and without subsequent deduction or
rebate on any account (except such payroll deductions as are permitted by
regulations issued by the Secretary of Labor under the Copeland Act (29 CFR
part 3)), the full amount of wages and bona fide fringe benefits (or cash
equivalents thereof) due at time of payment computed at rates not less than
those contained in the wage determination of the Secretary of Labor which is
attached hereto and made a part hereof, regardless of any contractual
relationship which may be alleged to exist between the contractor and such
laborers and mechanics. . . .
(3) Payrolls and basic records. . . .
(ii)
(A) The contractor shall submit weekly for each week in which any contract work is
performed a copy of all payrolls to the (write in name of appropriate federal agency)
if the agency is a party to the contract, but if the agency is not such a party, the
contractor will submit the payrolls to the applicant, sponsor, or owner, as the case
may be, for transmission to the (write in name of agency). . . ."
2 CFR 200 Appendix II states in part:
"In addition to other provisions required by the Federal agency or non-Federal entity; all
contracts made by the non-Federal entity under the Federal award must contain provisions
covering the following, as applicable. . . .
(D) Davis-Bacon Act, as amended (40 U.S.C. 3141-3148). When required by Federal
program legislation, all prime construction contracts in excess of $2,000 awarded by non-
Federal entities must include a provision for compliance with the Davis-Bacon Act (40
U.S.C. 3141-3144, and 3146-3148) as supplemented by Department of Labor regulations
(29 CFR Part 5, 'Labor Standards Provisions Applicable to Contracts Covering Federally
Financed and Assisted Construction'). In accordance with the statute, contractors must be
required to pay wages to laborers and mechanics at a rate not less than the prevailing
wages specified in a wage determination made by the Secretary of Labor. In addition,
contractors must be required to pay wages not less than once a week. . . ."
Cause
A proper system of internal controls was not designed by management of the School Corporation,
which would include segregation of key functions. Embedded within a properly designed and implemented
internal control system should be internal controls consisting of policies and procedures. Policies reflect
the School Corporation's management statements of what should be done to effect internal controls, and
procedures should consist of actions that would implement these policies.
Effect
Without the proper implementation of an effectively designed system of internal controls, the
internal control system cannot be capable of effectively preventing, or detecting and correcting, material
noncompliance. As a result, construction contracts entered into did not contain the required wage rate
requirements clauses nor were certified payrolls timely obtained by the School Corporation.
Noncompliance with the grant agreement and the compliance requirement could result in the loss
of future federal funds to the School Corporation.
Questioned Costs
There were no questioned costs identified.
Recommendation
We recommended that the School Corporation's management establish a system of internal controls
and include the wage rate requirement clause in construction contracts. In addition, certified payrolls
should be obtained as required.
Views of Responsible Officials
For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
FINDING 2023-004
Subject: COVID-19 - Education Stabilization Fund - Equipment and Real Property Management
Federal Agency: Department of Education
Federal Program: COVID-19 - Education Stabilization Fund
Assistance Listings Numbers: 84.425D, 84.425U
Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): S425D210013, S425U210013
Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education
Compliance Requirement: Equipment and Real Property Management
Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Modified Opinion
Condition and Context
The School Corporation paid $1,467,550 from the COVID-19 - Education Stabilization Fund
program for two improvement projects which exceeded the School Corporation's capitalization threshold.
The improvements were not added to the School Corporation's capital asset listing. Additionally, the School
Corporation completed a capital asset inventory as required; however, because material improvements
were not included in the capital asset listing, it was determined that the School Corporation did not reconcile
differences in the property records as required.
The lack of internal controls and noncompliance were systemic issues throughout the audit period.
Criteria
2 CFR 200.303 states in part:
"The non-Federal entity must:
(a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides
reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance
with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award.
These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal
Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States
or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring
Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ."
2 CFR 200.313(d) states in part:
"Management requirements. Procedures for managing equipment (including replacement
equipment), whether acquired in whole or in part under a Federal award, until disposition takes
place will, as a minimum, meet the following requirements:
(1) Property records must be maintained that include a description of the property, a serial
number or other identification number, the source of funding for the property (including
the FAIN), who holds title, the acquisition date, cost of the property, percentage of
federal participation in the project costs for the federal award under which the property
was acquired, the location, use and condition of the property, and any ultimate disposition
data including the date of disposal and sales price of the property.
(2) A physical inventory of the property must be taken and the results reconciled with the
property records at least once every two years. . . ."
Cause
A proper system of internal controls was not designed by management of the School Corporation,
which would include segregation of key functions. Embedded within a properly designed and implemented
internal control system should be internal controls consisting of policies and procedures. Policies reflect
the School Corporation's management statements of what should be done to effect internal controls, and
procedures should consist of actions that would implement these policies.
Effect
Without the proper implementation of an effectively designed system of internal controls, the
internal control system cannot be capable of effectively preventing, or detecting and correcting, material
noncompliance. As a result, improvements purchased were not properly added to the capital asset listing.
In addition, a reconcilement between the inventory records and the property records were not completed.
Noncompliance with the grant agreement and the compliance requirement could result in the loss
of federal funds to the School Corporation.
Questioned Costs
There were no questioned costs identified.
Recommendation
We recommended that management of the School Corporation establish a proper system of
internal controls and develop policies and procedures to ensure asset records include all assets.
Views of Responsible Officials
For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
FINDING 2023-003
Subject COVID-19 - Education Stabilization Fund - Special Tests
and Provisions - Wage Rate Requirements
Federal Agency: Department of Education
Federal Program: COVID-19 - Education Stabilization Fund
Assistance Listings Numbers: 84.425D, 84.425U
Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): S425D210013, S425U210013
Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education
Compliance Requirement: Special Tests and Provisions - Wage Rate Requirements
Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Modified Opinion
Condition and Context
Construction contracts in excess of $2,000 financed by federal assistance funds must pay wages
not less than those established for the locality of the project (prevailing wage rates) by the Department of
Labor (DOL) to their laborers and mechanics. Nonfederal entities are to include in their construction
contracts subject to the Wage Rate Requirements a provision that the contractor or subcontractor comply
with these requirements and the DOL regulations. This would include a requirement to submit a copy of
the payroll and statement of compliance to the entity for each week in which contract work was performed.
The School Corporation had not designed, nor implemented a system of internal controls to ensure
that construction contracts in excess of $2,000 paid from federal grant funds included a prevailing wage
rate clause. Two construction contracts, totaling $1,543,551 were paid from the COVID-19 - Education
Stabilization Fund grant funds during the audit period. Both contracts were tested; however, neither contract
contained the required prevailing wage rate clause. Certified payrolls were submitted by the contractor
for one of the contracts after the construction was completed for the contract which totaled $1,424,051;
however, certified payrolls could not be obtained for the contract which totaled $119,500.
The lack of internal controls and noncompliance were systemic issues throughout the audit period.
Criteria
2 CFR 200.303 states in part:
"The non-Federal entity must:
(a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides
reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance
with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award.
These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal
Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States
or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring
Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ."
29 CFR 5.5 states in part:
"(a) The Agency head shall cause or require the contracting officer to insert in full in any
contract in excess of $2,000 which is entered into for the actual construction, alteration and/or
repair, including painting and decorating, of a public building or public work, or building or work
financed in whole or in part from Federal funds or in accordance with guarantees of a Federal
agency or financed from funds obtained by pledge of any contract of a Federal agency to make
a loan, grant or annual contribution (except where a different meaning is expressly indicated),
and which is subject to the labor standards provisions of any of the acts listed in § 5.1, the
following clauses . . .
(1) Minimum wages.
(i) All laborers and mechanics employed or working upon the site of the work (or
under the United States Housing Act of 1937 or under the Housing Act of 1949
in the construction or development of the project), will be paid unconditionally
and not less often than once a week, and without subsequent deduction or
rebate on any account (except such payroll deductions as are permitted by
regulations issued by the Secretary of Labor under the Copeland Act (29 CFR
part 3)), the full amount of wages and bona fide fringe benefits (or cash
equivalents thereof) due at time of payment computed at rates not less than
those contained in the wage determination of the Secretary of Labor which is
attached hereto and made a part hereof, regardless of any contractual
relationship which may be alleged to exist between the contractor and such
laborers and mechanics. . . .
(3) Payrolls and basic records. . . .
(ii)
(A) The contractor shall submit weekly for each week in which any contract work is
performed a copy of all payrolls to the (write in name of appropriate federal agency)
if the agency is a party to the contract, but if the agency is not such a party, the
contractor will submit the payrolls to the applicant, sponsor, or owner, as the case
may be, for transmission to the (write in name of agency). . . ."
2 CFR 200 Appendix II states in part:
"In addition to other provisions required by the Federal agency or non-Federal entity; all
contracts made by the non-Federal entity under the Federal award must contain provisions
covering the following, as applicable. . . .
(D) Davis-Bacon Act, as amended (40 U.S.C. 3141-3148). When required by Federal
program legislation, all prime construction contracts in excess of $2,000 awarded by non-
Federal entities must include a provision for compliance with the Davis-Bacon Act (40
U.S.C. 3141-3144, and 3146-3148) as supplemented by Department of Labor regulations
(29 CFR Part 5, 'Labor Standards Provisions Applicable to Contracts Covering Federally
Financed and Assisted Construction'). In accordance with the statute, contractors must be
required to pay wages to laborers and mechanics at a rate not less than the prevailing
wages specified in a wage determination made by the Secretary of Labor. In addition,
contractors must be required to pay wages not less than once a week. . . ."
Cause
A proper system of internal controls was not designed by management of the School Corporation,
which would include segregation of key functions. Embedded within a properly designed and implemented
internal control system should be internal controls consisting of policies and procedures. Policies reflect
the School Corporation's management statements of what should be done to effect internal controls, and
procedures should consist of actions that would implement these policies.
Effect
Without the proper implementation of an effectively designed system of internal controls, the
internal control system cannot be capable of effectively preventing, or detecting and correcting, material
noncompliance. As a result, construction contracts entered into did not contain the required wage rate
requirements clauses nor were certified payrolls timely obtained by the School Corporation.
Noncompliance with the grant agreement and the compliance requirement could result in the loss
of future federal funds to the School Corporation.
Questioned Costs
There were no questioned costs identified.
Recommendation
We recommended that the School Corporation's management establish a system of internal controls
and include the wage rate requirement clause in construction contracts. In addition, certified payrolls
should be obtained as required.
Views of Responsible Officials
For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
FINDING 2023-004
Subject: COVID-19 - Education Stabilization Fund - Equipment and Real Property Management
Federal Agency: Department of Education
Federal Program: COVID-19 - Education Stabilization Fund
Assistance Listings Numbers: 84.425D, 84.425U
Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): S425D210013, S425U210013
Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education
Compliance Requirement: Equipment and Real Property Management
Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Modified Opinion
Condition and Context
The School Corporation paid $1,467,550 from the COVID-19 - Education Stabilization Fund
program for two improvement projects which exceeded the School Corporation's capitalization threshold.
The improvements were not added to the School Corporation's capital asset listing. Additionally, the School
Corporation completed a capital asset inventory as required; however, because material improvements
were not included in the capital asset listing, it was determined that the School Corporation did not reconcile
differences in the property records as required.
The lack of internal controls and noncompliance were systemic issues throughout the audit period.
Criteria
2 CFR 200.303 states in part:
"The non-Federal entity must:
(a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides
reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance
with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award.
These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal
Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States
or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring
Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ."
2 CFR 200.313(d) states in part:
"Management requirements. Procedures for managing equipment (including replacement
equipment), whether acquired in whole or in part under a Federal award, until disposition takes
place will, as a minimum, meet the following requirements:
(1) Property records must be maintained that include a description of the property, a serial
number or other identification number, the source of funding for the property (including
the FAIN), who holds title, the acquisition date, cost of the property, percentage of
federal participation in the project costs for the federal award under which the property
was acquired, the location, use and condition of the property, and any ultimate disposition
data including the date of disposal and sales price of the property.
(2) A physical inventory of the property must be taken and the results reconciled with the
property records at least once every two years. . . ."
Cause
A proper system of internal controls was not designed by management of the School Corporation,
which would include segregation of key functions. Embedded within a properly designed and implemented
internal control system should be internal controls consisting of policies and procedures. Policies reflect
the School Corporation's management statements of what should be done to effect internal controls, and
procedures should consist of actions that would implement these policies.
Effect
Without the proper implementation of an effectively designed system of internal controls, the
internal control system cannot be capable of effectively preventing, or detecting and correcting, material
noncompliance. As a result, improvements purchased were not properly added to the capital asset listing.
In addition, a reconcilement between the inventory records and the property records were not completed.
Noncompliance with the grant agreement and the compliance requirement could result in the loss
of federal funds to the School Corporation.
Questioned Costs
There were no questioned costs identified.
Recommendation
We recommended that management of the School Corporation establish a proper system of
internal controls and develop policies and procedures to ensure asset records include all assets.
Views of Responsible Officials
For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
FINDING 2023-002
Subject: Special Education Cluster - Earmarking
Federal Agency: Department of Education
Federal Program: Special Education Grants to States, Special Education Preschool Grants
Assistance Listings Numbers: 84.027, 84.173
Federal Award Numbers and Years: 20611-043-PN01, 21611-043-PN01, 21619-43-PN01
Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education
Compliance Requirements: Matching, Level of Effort, Earmarking
Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Modified Opinion
Repeat Finding
This is a repeat finding from the prior audit report. The prior audit finding number was 2021-001.
Condition and Context
The School Corporation is a member of the Northwest Indiana Special Education Cooperative
(Cooperative). During fiscal year 2021-2022, the Cooperative operated the special education programs
and spent the federal money on behalf of all its members. As the grant agreements were between the
Indiana Department of Education (IDOE) and each member school, the School Corporation was
responsible for ensuring and providing oversight of the Cooperative. However, there was inadequate
oversight performed by the School Corporation in order to ensure compliance with the Matching, Level of
Effort, Earmarking compliance requirement.
The School Corporation did not have internal controls in place to ensure that the Cooperative
complied with the earmarking requirements. The Cooperative did not have adequate procedures in place
to ensure that the required level of expenditures for non-public school students with disabilities was met for
each member school. The Cooperative did not have effective internal controls to ensure non-public school
expenditures were appropriately identified and reported.
The Non-Public Proportionate Share expenditures for the 20611-043-PN01, 21611-043-PN01, and
21619-43-PN01 grant awards could not be verified for the individual member schools. The non-public
school share funds for all member schools were comingled and the aggregate amount of expenditures was
then allocated to the member schools on a percentage basis. These allocations were the amounts reported
to the IDOE. As such, we were unable to identify which expenditures were for each school in order to verify
the minimum amount per the grant award was expended and properly reported to the IDOE as required.
The lack of internal controls and noncompliance were isolated to the 20611-043-PN01,
21611-043-PN01, and 21619-43-PN01 grant awards.
Criteria
2 CFR 200.303 states in part:
"The non-Federal entity must:
(a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides
reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance
with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award.
These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal
Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States
or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring
Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ."
2 CFR 200.403 states in part:
"Except where otherwise authorized by statute, costs must meet the following general criteria
in order to be allowable under Federal awards: . . .
(g) Be adequately documented. . . ."
2 CFR 200.208(b) states in part: "The Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity may adjust
specific Federal award conditions as needed . . ."
511 IAC 7-34-7(b) states:
"The public agency, in providing special education and related services to students in nonpublic
schools must expend at least an amount that is the same proportion of the public agency total
subgrant under 20 U.S.C. 1411(f) as the number of nonpublic school students with disabilities,
who are enrolled by their parents in nonpublic schools within its boundaries, is to the total
number of students with disabilities of the same age range."
Cause
A proper system of internal controls was not designed by management of the School Corporation.
Embedded within a properly designed and implemented internal control system should be internal controls
consisting of policies and procedures. Policies reflect the School Corporation's management statements
of what should be done to effect internal control, and procedures should consist of actions that would
implement these policies.
Effect
Without the proper implementation of an effectively designed system of internal controls, the
internal control system cannot be capable of effectively preventing, or detecting and correcting, material
noncompliance. As a result, it could not be determined if the School Corporation expended their required
non-public proportionate share.
Noncompliance with the provisions of federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of
the federal award could result in the loss of future federal funding to the School Corporation.
Questioned Costs
There were no questioned costs identified.
Recommendation
We recommended that management of the School Corporation establish a proper system of
internal controls and develop policies and procedures to ensure that the required non-public proportionate
share amounts are spent as required.
Views of Responsible Officials
For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
FINDING 2023-002
Subject: Special Education Cluster - Earmarking
Federal Agency: Department of Education
Federal Program: Special Education Grants to States, Special Education Preschool Grants
Assistance Listings Numbers: 84.027, 84.173
Federal Award Numbers and Years: 20611-043-PN01, 21611-043-PN01, 21619-43-PN01
Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education
Compliance Requirements: Matching, Level of Effort, Earmarking
Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Modified Opinion
Repeat Finding
This is a repeat finding from the prior audit report. The prior audit finding number was 2021-001.
Condition and Context
The School Corporation is a member of the Northwest Indiana Special Education Cooperative
(Cooperative). During fiscal year 2021-2022, the Cooperative operated the special education programs
and spent the federal money on behalf of all its members. As the grant agreements were between the
Indiana Department of Education (IDOE) and each member school, the School Corporation was
responsible for ensuring and providing oversight of the Cooperative. However, there was inadequate
oversight performed by the School Corporation in order to ensure compliance with the Matching, Level of
Effort, Earmarking compliance requirement.
The School Corporation did not have internal controls in place to ensure that the Cooperative
complied with the earmarking requirements. The Cooperative did not have adequate procedures in place
to ensure that the required level of expenditures for non-public school students with disabilities was met for
each member school. The Cooperative did not have effective internal controls to ensure non-public school
expenditures were appropriately identified and reported.
The Non-Public Proportionate Share expenditures for the 20611-043-PN01, 21611-043-PN01, and
21619-43-PN01 grant awards could not be verified for the individual member schools. The non-public
school share funds for all member schools were comingled and the aggregate amount of expenditures was
then allocated to the member schools on a percentage basis. These allocations were the amounts reported
to the IDOE. As such, we were unable to identify which expenditures were for each school in order to verify
the minimum amount per the grant award was expended and properly reported to the IDOE as required.
The lack of internal controls and noncompliance were isolated to the 20611-043-PN01,
21611-043-PN01, and 21619-43-PN01 grant awards.
Criteria
2 CFR 200.303 states in part:
"The non-Federal entity must:
(a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides
reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance
with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award.
These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal
Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States
or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring
Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ."
2 CFR 200.403 states in part:
"Except where otherwise authorized by statute, costs must meet the following general criteria
in order to be allowable under Federal awards: . . .
(g) Be adequately documented. . . ."
2 CFR 200.208(b) states in part: "The Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity may adjust
specific Federal award conditions as needed . . ."
511 IAC 7-34-7(b) states:
"The public agency, in providing special education and related services to students in nonpublic
schools must expend at least an amount that is the same proportion of the public agency total
subgrant under 20 U.S.C. 1411(f) as the number of nonpublic school students with disabilities,
who are enrolled by their parents in nonpublic schools within its boundaries, is to the total
number of students with disabilities of the same age range."
Cause
A proper system of internal controls was not designed by management of the School Corporation.
Embedded within a properly designed and implemented internal control system should be internal controls
consisting of policies and procedures. Policies reflect the School Corporation's management statements
of what should be done to effect internal control, and procedures should consist of actions that would
implement these policies.
Effect
Without the proper implementation of an effectively designed system of internal controls, the
internal control system cannot be capable of effectively preventing, or detecting and correcting, material
noncompliance. As a result, it could not be determined if the School Corporation expended their required
non-public proportionate share.
Noncompliance with the provisions of federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of
the federal award could result in the loss of future federal funding to the School Corporation.
Questioned Costs
There were no questioned costs identified.
Recommendation
We recommended that management of the School Corporation establish a proper system of
internal controls and develop policies and procedures to ensure that the required non-public proportionate
share amounts are spent as required.
Views of Responsible Officials
For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
FINDING 2023-003
Subject COVID-19 - Education Stabilization Fund - Special Tests
and Provisions - Wage Rate Requirements
Federal Agency: Department of Education
Federal Program: COVID-19 - Education Stabilization Fund
Assistance Listings Numbers: 84.425D, 84.425U
Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): S425D210013, S425U210013
Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education
Compliance Requirement: Special Tests and Provisions - Wage Rate Requirements
Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Modified Opinion
Condition and Context
Construction contracts in excess of $2,000 financed by federal assistance funds must pay wages
not less than those established for the locality of the project (prevailing wage rates) by the Department of
Labor (DOL) to their laborers and mechanics. Nonfederal entities are to include in their construction
contracts subject to the Wage Rate Requirements a provision that the contractor or subcontractor comply
with these requirements and the DOL regulations. This would include a requirement to submit a copy of
the payroll and statement of compliance to the entity for each week in which contract work was performed.
The School Corporation had not designed, nor implemented a system of internal controls to ensure
that construction contracts in excess of $2,000 paid from federal grant funds included a prevailing wage
rate clause. Two construction contracts, totaling $1,543,551 were paid from the COVID-19 - Education
Stabilization Fund grant funds during the audit period. Both contracts were tested; however, neither contract
contained the required prevailing wage rate clause. Certified payrolls were submitted by the contractor
for one of the contracts after the construction was completed for the contract which totaled $1,424,051;
however, certified payrolls could not be obtained for the contract which totaled $119,500.
The lack of internal controls and noncompliance were systemic issues throughout the audit period.
Criteria
2 CFR 200.303 states in part:
"The non-Federal entity must:
(a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides
reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance
with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award.
These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal
Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States
or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring
Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ."
29 CFR 5.5 states in part:
"(a) The Agency head shall cause or require the contracting officer to insert in full in any
contract in excess of $2,000 which is entered into for the actual construction, alteration and/or
repair, including painting and decorating, of a public building or public work, or building or work
financed in whole or in part from Federal funds or in accordance with guarantees of a Federal
agency or financed from funds obtained by pledge of any contract of a Federal agency to make
a loan, grant or annual contribution (except where a different meaning is expressly indicated),
and which is subject to the labor standards provisions of any of the acts listed in § 5.1, the
following clauses . . .
(1) Minimum wages.
(i) All laborers and mechanics employed or working upon the site of the work (or
under the United States Housing Act of 1937 or under the Housing Act of 1949
in the construction or development of the project), will be paid unconditionally
and not less often than once a week, and without subsequent deduction or
rebate on any account (except such payroll deductions as are permitted by
regulations issued by the Secretary of Labor under the Copeland Act (29 CFR
part 3)), the full amount of wages and bona fide fringe benefits (or cash
equivalents thereof) due at time of payment computed at rates not less than
those contained in the wage determination of the Secretary of Labor which is
attached hereto and made a part hereof, regardless of any contractual
relationship which may be alleged to exist between the contractor and such
laborers and mechanics. . . .
(3) Payrolls and basic records. . . .
(ii)
(A) The contractor shall submit weekly for each week in which any contract work is
performed a copy of all payrolls to the (write in name of appropriate federal agency)
if the agency is a party to the contract, but if the agency is not such a party, the
contractor will submit the payrolls to the applicant, sponsor, or owner, as the case
may be, for transmission to the (write in name of agency). . . ."
2 CFR 200 Appendix II states in part:
"In addition to other provisions required by the Federal agency or non-Federal entity; all
contracts made by the non-Federal entity under the Federal award must contain provisions
covering the following, as applicable. . . .
(D) Davis-Bacon Act, as amended (40 U.S.C. 3141-3148). When required by Federal
program legislation, all prime construction contracts in excess of $2,000 awarded by non-
Federal entities must include a provision for compliance with the Davis-Bacon Act (40
U.S.C. 3141-3144, and 3146-3148) as supplemented by Department of Labor regulations
(29 CFR Part 5, 'Labor Standards Provisions Applicable to Contracts Covering Federally
Financed and Assisted Construction'). In accordance with the statute, contractors must be
required to pay wages to laborers and mechanics at a rate not less than the prevailing
wages specified in a wage determination made by the Secretary of Labor. In addition,
contractors must be required to pay wages not less than once a week. . . ."
Cause
A proper system of internal controls was not designed by management of the School Corporation,
which would include segregation of key functions. Embedded within a properly designed and implemented
internal control system should be internal controls consisting of policies and procedures. Policies reflect
the School Corporation's management statements of what should be done to effect internal controls, and
procedures should consist of actions that would implement these policies.
Effect
Without the proper implementation of an effectively designed system of internal controls, the
internal control system cannot be capable of effectively preventing, or detecting and correcting, material
noncompliance. As a result, construction contracts entered into did not contain the required wage rate
requirements clauses nor were certified payrolls timely obtained by the School Corporation.
Noncompliance with the grant agreement and the compliance requirement could result in the loss
of future federal funds to the School Corporation.
Questioned Costs
There were no questioned costs identified.
Recommendation
We recommended that the School Corporation's management establish a system of internal controls
and include the wage rate requirement clause in construction contracts. In addition, certified payrolls
should be obtained as required.
Views of Responsible Officials
For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
FINDING 2023-004
Subject: COVID-19 - Education Stabilization Fund - Equipment and Real Property Management
Federal Agency: Department of Education
Federal Program: COVID-19 - Education Stabilization Fund
Assistance Listings Numbers: 84.425D, 84.425U
Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): S425D210013, S425U210013
Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education
Compliance Requirement: Equipment and Real Property Management
Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Modified Opinion
Condition and Context
The School Corporation paid $1,467,550 from the COVID-19 - Education Stabilization Fund
program for two improvement projects which exceeded the School Corporation's capitalization threshold.
The improvements were not added to the School Corporation's capital asset listing. Additionally, the School
Corporation completed a capital asset inventory as required; however, because material improvements
were not included in the capital asset listing, it was determined that the School Corporation did not reconcile
differences in the property records as required.
The lack of internal controls and noncompliance were systemic issues throughout the audit period.
Criteria
2 CFR 200.303 states in part:
"The non-Federal entity must:
(a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides
reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance
with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award.
These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal
Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States
or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring
Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ."
2 CFR 200.313(d) states in part:
"Management requirements. Procedures for managing equipment (including replacement
equipment), whether acquired in whole or in part under a Federal award, until disposition takes
place will, as a minimum, meet the following requirements:
(1) Property records must be maintained that include a description of the property, a serial
number or other identification number, the source of funding for the property (including
the FAIN), who holds title, the acquisition date, cost of the property, percentage of
federal participation in the project costs for the federal award under which the property
was acquired, the location, use and condition of the property, and any ultimate disposition
data including the date of disposal and sales price of the property.
(2) A physical inventory of the property must be taken and the results reconciled with the
property records at least once every two years. . . ."
Cause
A proper system of internal controls was not designed by management of the School Corporation,
which would include segregation of key functions. Embedded within a properly designed and implemented
internal control system should be internal controls consisting of policies and procedures. Policies reflect
the School Corporation's management statements of what should be done to effect internal controls, and
procedures should consist of actions that would implement these policies.
Effect
Without the proper implementation of an effectively designed system of internal controls, the
internal control system cannot be capable of effectively preventing, or detecting and correcting, material
noncompliance. As a result, improvements purchased were not properly added to the capital asset listing.
In addition, a reconcilement between the inventory records and the property records were not completed.
Noncompliance with the grant agreement and the compliance requirement could result in the loss
of federal funds to the School Corporation.
Questioned Costs
There were no questioned costs identified.
Recommendation
We recommended that management of the School Corporation establish a proper system of
internal controls and develop policies and procedures to ensure asset records include all assets.
Views of Responsible Officials
For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
FINDING 2023-003
Subject COVID-19 - Education Stabilization Fund - Special Tests
and Provisions - Wage Rate Requirements
Federal Agency: Department of Education
Federal Program: COVID-19 - Education Stabilization Fund
Assistance Listings Numbers: 84.425D, 84.425U
Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): S425D210013, S425U210013
Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education
Compliance Requirement: Special Tests and Provisions - Wage Rate Requirements
Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Modified Opinion
Condition and Context
Construction contracts in excess of $2,000 financed by federal assistance funds must pay wages
not less than those established for the locality of the project (prevailing wage rates) by the Department of
Labor (DOL) to their laborers and mechanics. Nonfederal entities are to include in their construction
contracts subject to the Wage Rate Requirements a provision that the contractor or subcontractor comply
with these requirements and the DOL regulations. This would include a requirement to submit a copy of
the payroll and statement of compliance to the entity for each week in which contract work was performed.
The School Corporation had not designed, nor implemented a system of internal controls to ensure
that construction contracts in excess of $2,000 paid from federal grant funds included a prevailing wage
rate clause. Two construction contracts, totaling $1,543,551 were paid from the COVID-19 - Education
Stabilization Fund grant funds during the audit period. Both contracts were tested; however, neither contract
contained the required prevailing wage rate clause. Certified payrolls were submitted by the contractor
for one of the contracts after the construction was completed for the contract which totaled $1,424,051;
however, certified payrolls could not be obtained for the contract which totaled $119,500.
The lack of internal controls and noncompliance were systemic issues throughout the audit period.
Criteria
2 CFR 200.303 states in part:
"The non-Federal entity must:
(a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides
reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance
with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award.
These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal
Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States
or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring
Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ."
29 CFR 5.5 states in part:
"(a) The Agency head shall cause or require the contracting officer to insert in full in any
contract in excess of $2,000 which is entered into for the actual construction, alteration and/or
repair, including painting and decorating, of a public building or public work, or building or work
financed in whole or in part from Federal funds or in accordance with guarantees of a Federal
agency or financed from funds obtained by pledge of any contract of a Federal agency to make
a loan, grant or annual contribution (except where a different meaning is expressly indicated),
and which is subject to the labor standards provisions of any of the acts listed in § 5.1, the
following clauses . . .
(1) Minimum wages.
(i) All laborers and mechanics employed or working upon the site of the work (or
under the United States Housing Act of 1937 or under the Housing Act of 1949
in the construction or development of the project), will be paid unconditionally
and not less often than once a week, and without subsequent deduction or
rebate on any account (except such payroll deductions as are permitted by
regulations issued by the Secretary of Labor under the Copeland Act (29 CFR
part 3)), the full amount of wages and bona fide fringe benefits (or cash
equivalents thereof) due at time of payment computed at rates not less than
those contained in the wage determination of the Secretary of Labor which is
attached hereto and made a part hereof, regardless of any contractual
relationship which may be alleged to exist between the contractor and such
laborers and mechanics. . . .
(3) Payrolls and basic records. . . .
(ii)
(A) The contractor shall submit weekly for each week in which any contract work is
performed a copy of all payrolls to the (write in name of appropriate federal agency)
if the agency is a party to the contract, but if the agency is not such a party, the
contractor will submit the payrolls to the applicant, sponsor, or owner, as the case
may be, for transmission to the (write in name of agency). . . ."
2 CFR 200 Appendix II states in part:
"In addition to other provisions required by the Federal agency or non-Federal entity; all
contracts made by the non-Federal entity under the Federal award must contain provisions
covering the following, as applicable. . . .
(D) Davis-Bacon Act, as amended (40 U.S.C. 3141-3148). When required by Federal
program legislation, all prime construction contracts in excess of $2,000 awarded by non-
Federal entities must include a provision for compliance with the Davis-Bacon Act (40
U.S.C. 3141-3144, and 3146-3148) as supplemented by Department of Labor regulations
(29 CFR Part 5, 'Labor Standards Provisions Applicable to Contracts Covering Federally
Financed and Assisted Construction'). In accordance with the statute, contractors must be
required to pay wages to laborers and mechanics at a rate not less than the prevailing
wages specified in a wage determination made by the Secretary of Labor. In addition,
contractors must be required to pay wages not less than once a week. . . ."
Cause
A proper system of internal controls was not designed by management of the School Corporation,
which would include segregation of key functions. Embedded within a properly designed and implemented
internal control system should be internal controls consisting of policies and procedures. Policies reflect
the School Corporation's management statements of what should be done to effect internal controls, and
procedures should consist of actions that would implement these policies.
Effect
Without the proper implementation of an effectively designed system of internal controls, the
internal control system cannot be capable of effectively preventing, or detecting and correcting, material
noncompliance. As a result, construction contracts entered into did not contain the required wage rate
requirements clauses nor were certified payrolls timely obtained by the School Corporation.
Noncompliance with the grant agreement and the compliance requirement could result in the loss
of future federal funds to the School Corporation.
Questioned Costs
There were no questioned costs identified.
Recommendation
We recommended that the School Corporation's management establish a system of internal controls
and include the wage rate requirement clause in construction contracts. In addition, certified payrolls
should be obtained as required.
Views of Responsible Officials
For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
FINDING 2023-004
Subject: COVID-19 - Education Stabilization Fund - Equipment and Real Property Management
Federal Agency: Department of Education
Federal Program: COVID-19 - Education Stabilization Fund
Assistance Listings Numbers: 84.425D, 84.425U
Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): S425D210013, S425U210013
Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education
Compliance Requirement: Equipment and Real Property Management
Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Modified Opinion
Condition and Context
The School Corporation paid $1,467,550 from the COVID-19 - Education Stabilization Fund
program for two improvement projects which exceeded the School Corporation's capitalization threshold.
The improvements were not added to the School Corporation's capital asset listing. Additionally, the School
Corporation completed a capital asset inventory as required; however, because material improvements
were not included in the capital asset listing, it was determined that the School Corporation did not reconcile
differences in the property records as required.
The lack of internal controls and noncompliance were systemic issues throughout the audit period.
Criteria
2 CFR 200.303 states in part:
"The non-Federal entity must:
(a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides
reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance
with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award.
These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal
Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States
or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring
Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ."
2 CFR 200.313(d) states in part:
"Management requirements. Procedures for managing equipment (including replacement
equipment), whether acquired in whole or in part under a Federal award, until disposition takes
place will, as a minimum, meet the following requirements:
(1) Property records must be maintained that include a description of the property, a serial
number or other identification number, the source of funding for the property (including
the FAIN), who holds title, the acquisition date, cost of the property, percentage of
federal participation in the project costs for the federal award under which the property
was acquired, the location, use and condition of the property, and any ultimate disposition
data including the date of disposal and sales price of the property.
(2) A physical inventory of the property must be taken and the results reconciled with the
property records at least once every two years. . . ."
Cause
A proper system of internal controls was not designed by management of the School Corporation,
which would include segregation of key functions. Embedded within a properly designed and implemented
internal control system should be internal controls consisting of policies and procedures. Policies reflect
the School Corporation's management statements of what should be done to effect internal controls, and
procedures should consist of actions that would implement these policies.
Effect
Without the proper implementation of an effectively designed system of internal controls, the
internal control system cannot be capable of effectively preventing, or detecting and correcting, material
noncompliance. As a result, improvements purchased were not properly added to the capital asset listing.
In addition, a reconcilement between the inventory records and the property records were not completed.
Noncompliance with the grant agreement and the compliance requirement could result in the loss
of federal funds to the School Corporation.
Questioned Costs
There were no questioned costs identified.
Recommendation
We recommended that management of the School Corporation establish a proper system of
internal controls and develop policies and procedures to ensure asset records include all assets.
Views of Responsible Officials
For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
FINDING 2023-003
Subject COVID-19 - Education Stabilization Fund - Special Tests
and Provisions - Wage Rate Requirements
Federal Agency: Department of Education
Federal Program: COVID-19 - Education Stabilization Fund
Assistance Listings Numbers: 84.425D, 84.425U
Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): S425D210013, S425U210013
Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education
Compliance Requirement: Special Tests and Provisions - Wage Rate Requirements
Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Modified Opinion
Condition and Context
Construction contracts in excess of $2,000 financed by federal assistance funds must pay wages
not less than those established for the locality of the project (prevailing wage rates) by the Department of
Labor (DOL) to their laborers and mechanics. Nonfederal entities are to include in their construction
contracts subject to the Wage Rate Requirements a provision that the contractor or subcontractor comply
with these requirements and the DOL regulations. This would include a requirement to submit a copy of
the payroll and statement of compliance to the entity for each week in which contract work was performed.
The School Corporation had not designed, nor implemented a system of internal controls to ensure
that construction contracts in excess of $2,000 paid from federal grant funds included a prevailing wage
rate clause. Two construction contracts, totaling $1,543,551 were paid from the COVID-19 - Education
Stabilization Fund grant funds during the audit period. Both contracts were tested; however, neither contract
contained the required prevailing wage rate clause. Certified payrolls were submitted by the contractor
for one of the contracts after the construction was completed for the contract which totaled $1,424,051;
however, certified payrolls could not be obtained for the contract which totaled $119,500.
The lack of internal controls and noncompliance were systemic issues throughout the audit period.
Criteria
2 CFR 200.303 states in part:
"The non-Federal entity must:
(a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides
reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance
with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award.
These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal
Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States
or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring
Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ."
29 CFR 5.5 states in part:
"(a) The Agency head shall cause or require the contracting officer to insert in full in any
contract in excess of $2,000 which is entered into for the actual construction, alteration and/or
repair, including painting and decorating, of a public building or public work, or building or work
financed in whole or in part from Federal funds or in accordance with guarantees of a Federal
agency or financed from funds obtained by pledge of any contract of a Federal agency to make
a loan, grant or annual contribution (except where a different meaning is expressly indicated),
and which is subject to the labor standards provisions of any of the acts listed in § 5.1, the
following clauses . . .
(1) Minimum wages.
(i) All laborers and mechanics employed or working upon the site of the work (or
under the United States Housing Act of 1937 or under the Housing Act of 1949
in the construction or development of the project), will be paid unconditionally
and not less often than once a week, and without subsequent deduction or
rebate on any account (except such payroll deductions as are permitted by
regulations issued by the Secretary of Labor under the Copeland Act (29 CFR
part 3)), the full amount of wages and bona fide fringe benefits (or cash
equivalents thereof) due at time of payment computed at rates not less than
those contained in the wage determination of the Secretary of Labor which is
attached hereto and made a part hereof, regardless of any contractual
relationship which may be alleged to exist between the contractor and such
laborers and mechanics. . . .
(3) Payrolls and basic records. . . .
(ii)
(A) The contractor shall submit weekly for each week in which any contract work is
performed a copy of all payrolls to the (write in name of appropriate federal agency)
if the agency is a party to the contract, but if the agency is not such a party, the
contractor will submit the payrolls to the applicant, sponsor, or owner, as the case
may be, for transmission to the (write in name of agency). . . ."
2 CFR 200 Appendix II states in part:
"In addition to other provisions required by the Federal agency or non-Federal entity; all
contracts made by the non-Federal entity under the Federal award must contain provisions
covering the following, as applicable. . . .
(D) Davis-Bacon Act, as amended (40 U.S.C. 3141-3148). When required by Federal
program legislation, all prime construction contracts in excess of $2,000 awarded by non-
Federal entities must include a provision for compliance with the Davis-Bacon Act (40
U.S.C. 3141-3144, and 3146-3148) as supplemented by Department of Labor regulations
(29 CFR Part 5, 'Labor Standards Provisions Applicable to Contracts Covering Federally
Financed and Assisted Construction'). In accordance with the statute, contractors must be
required to pay wages to laborers and mechanics at a rate not less than the prevailing
wages specified in a wage determination made by the Secretary of Labor. In addition,
contractors must be required to pay wages not less than once a week. . . ."
Cause
A proper system of internal controls was not designed by management of the School Corporation,
which would include segregation of key functions. Embedded within a properly designed and implemented
internal control system should be internal controls consisting of policies and procedures. Policies reflect
the School Corporation's management statements of what should be done to effect internal controls, and
procedures should consist of actions that would implement these policies.
Effect
Without the proper implementation of an effectively designed system of internal controls, the
internal control system cannot be capable of effectively preventing, or detecting and correcting, material
noncompliance. As a result, construction contracts entered into did not contain the required wage rate
requirements clauses nor were certified payrolls timely obtained by the School Corporation.
Noncompliance with the grant agreement and the compliance requirement could result in the loss
of future federal funds to the School Corporation.
Questioned Costs
There were no questioned costs identified.
Recommendation
We recommended that the School Corporation's management establish a system of internal controls
and include the wage rate requirement clause in construction contracts. In addition, certified payrolls
should be obtained as required.
Views of Responsible Officials
For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
FINDING 2023-004
Subject: COVID-19 - Education Stabilization Fund - Equipment and Real Property Management
Federal Agency: Department of Education
Federal Program: COVID-19 - Education Stabilization Fund
Assistance Listings Numbers: 84.425D, 84.425U
Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): S425D210013, S425U210013
Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education
Compliance Requirement: Equipment and Real Property Management
Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Modified Opinion
Condition and Context
The School Corporation paid $1,467,550 from the COVID-19 - Education Stabilization Fund
program for two improvement projects which exceeded the School Corporation's capitalization threshold.
The improvements were not added to the School Corporation's capital asset listing. Additionally, the School
Corporation completed a capital asset inventory as required; however, because material improvements
were not included in the capital asset listing, it was determined that the School Corporation did not reconcile
differences in the property records as required.
The lack of internal controls and noncompliance were systemic issues throughout the audit period.
Criteria
2 CFR 200.303 states in part:
"The non-Federal entity must:
(a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides
reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance
with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award.
These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal
Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States
or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring
Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ."
2 CFR 200.313(d) states in part:
"Management requirements. Procedures for managing equipment (including replacement
equipment), whether acquired in whole or in part under a Federal award, until disposition takes
place will, as a minimum, meet the following requirements:
(1) Property records must be maintained that include a description of the property, a serial
number or other identification number, the source of funding for the property (including
the FAIN), who holds title, the acquisition date, cost of the property, percentage of
federal participation in the project costs for the federal award under which the property
was acquired, the location, use and condition of the property, and any ultimate disposition
data including the date of disposal and sales price of the property.
(2) A physical inventory of the property must be taken and the results reconciled with the
property records at least once every two years. . . ."
Cause
A proper system of internal controls was not designed by management of the School Corporation,
which would include segregation of key functions. Embedded within a properly designed and implemented
internal control system should be internal controls consisting of policies and procedures. Policies reflect
the School Corporation's management statements of what should be done to effect internal controls, and
procedures should consist of actions that would implement these policies.
Effect
Without the proper implementation of an effectively designed system of internal controls, the
internal control system cannot be capable of effectively preventing, or detecting and correcting, material
noncompliance. As a result, improvements purchased were not properly added to the capital asset listing.
In addition, a reconcilement between the inventory records and the property records were not completed.
Noncompliance with the grant agreement and the compliance requirement could result in the loss
of federal funds to the School Corporation.
Questioned Costs
There were no questioned costs identified.
Recommendation
We recommended that management of the School Corporation establish a proper system of
internal controls and develop policies and procedures to ensure asset records include all assets.
Views of Responsible Officials
For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
FINDING 2023-003
Subject COVID-19 - Education Stabilization Fund - Special Tests
and Provisions - Wage Rate Requirements
Federal Agency: Department of Education
Federal Program: COVID-19 - Education Stabilization Fund
Assistance Listings Numbers: 84.425D, 84.425U
Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): S425D210013, S425U210013
Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education
Compliance Requirement: Special Tests and Provisions - Wage Rate Requirements
Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Modified Opinion
Condition and Context
Construction contracts in excess of $2,000 financed by federal assistance funds must pay wages
not less than those established for the locality of the project (prevailing wage rates) by the Department of
Labor (DOL) to their laborers and mechanics. Nonfederal entities are to include in their construction
contracts subject to the Wage Rate Requirements a provision that the contractor or subcontractor comply
with these requirements and the DOL regulations. This would include a requirement to submit a copy of
the payroll and statement of compliance to the entity for each week in which contract work was performed.
The School Corporation had not designed, nor implemented a system of internal controls to ensure
that construction contracts in excess of $2,000 paid from federal grant funds included a prevailing wage
rate clause. Two construction contracts, totaling $1,543,551 were paid from the COVID-19 - Education
Stabilization Fund grant funds during the audit period. Both contracts were tested; however, neither contract
contained the required prevailing wage rate clause. Certified payrolls were submitted by the contractor
for one of the contracts after the construction was completed for the contract which totaled $1,424,051;
however, certified payrolls could not be obtained for the contract which totaled $119,500.
The lack of internal controls and noncompliance were systemic issues throughout the audit period.
Criteria
2 CFR 200.303 states in part:
"The non-Federal entity must:
(a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides
reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance
with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award.
These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal
Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States
or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring
Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ."
29 CFR 5.5 states in part:
"(a) The Agency head shall cause or require the contracting officer to insert in full in any
contract in excess of $2,000 which is entered into for the actual construction, alteration and/or
repair, including painting and decorating, of a public building or public work, or building or work
financed in whole or in part from Federal funds or in accordance with guarantees of a Federal
agency or financed from funds obtained by pledge of any contract of a Federal agency to make
a loan, grant or annual contribution (except where a different meaning is expressly indicated),
and which is subject to the labor standards provisions of any of the acts listed in § 5.1, the
following clauses . . .
(1) Minimum wages.
(i) All laborers and mechanics employed or working upon the site of the work (or
under the United States Housing Act of 1937 or under the Housing Act of 1949
in the construction or development of the project), will be paid unconditionally
and not less often than once a week, and without subsequent deduction or
rebate on any account (except such payroll deductions as are permitted by
regulations issued by the Secretary of Labor under the Copeland Act (29 CFR
part 3)), the full amount of wages and bona fide fringe benefits (or cash
equivalents thereof) due at time of payment computed at rates not less than
those contained in the wage determination of the Secretary of Labor which is
attached hereto and made a part hereof, regardless of any contractual
relationship which may be alleged to exist between the contractor and such
laborers and mechanics. . . .
(3) Payrolls and basic records. . . .
(ii)
(A) The contractor shall submit weekly for each week in which any contract work is
performed a copy of all payrolls to the (write in name of appropriate federal agency)
if the agency is a party to the contract, but if the agency is not such a party, the
contractor will submit the payrolls to the applicant, sponsor, or owner, as the case
may be, for transmission to the (write in name of agency). . . ."
2 CFR 200 Appendix II states in part:
"In addition to other provisions required by the Federal agency or non-Federal entity; all
contracts made by the non-Federal entity under the Federal award must contain provisions
covering the following, as applicable. . . .
(D) Davis-Bacon Act, as amended (40 U.S.C. 3141-3148). When required by Federal
program legislation, all prime construction contracts in excess of $2,000 awarded by non-
Federal entities must include a provision for compliance with the Davis-Bacon Act (40
U.S.C. 3141-3144, and 3146-3148) as supplemented by Department of Labor regulations
(29 CFR Part 5, 'Labor Standards Provisions Applicable to Contracts Covering Federally
Financed and Assisted Construction'). In accordance with the statute, contractors must be
required to pay wages to laborers and mechanics at a rate not less than the prevailing
wages specified in a wage determination made by the Secretary of Labor. In addition,
contractors must be required to pay wages not less than once a week. . . ."
Cause
A proper system of internal controls was not designed by management of the School Corporation,
which would include segregation of key functions. Embedded within a properly designed and implemented
internal control system should be internal controls consisting of policies and procedures. Policies reflect
the School Corporation's management statements of what should be done to effect internal controls, and
procedures should consist of actions that would implement these policies.
Effect
Without the proper implementation of an effectively designed system of internal controls, the
internal control system cannot be capable of effectively preventing, or detecting and correcting, material
noncompliance. As a result, construction contracts entered into did not contain the required wage rate
requirements clauses nor were certified payrolls timely obtained by the School Corporation.
Noncompliance with the grant agreement and the compliance requirement could result in the loss
of future federal funds to the School Corporation.
Questioned Costs
There were no questioned costs identified.
Recommendation
We recommended that the School Corporation's management establish a system of internal controls
and include the wage rate requirement clause in construction contracts. In addition, certified payrolls
should be obtained as required.
Views of Responsible Officials
For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
FINDING 2023-004
Subject: COVID-19 - Education Stabilization Fund - Equipment and Real Property Management
Federal Agency: Department of Education
Federal Program: COVID-19 - Education Stabilization Fund
Assistance Listings Numbers: 84.425D, 84.425U
Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): S425D210013, S425U210013
Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education
Compliance Requirement: Equipment and Real Property Management
Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Modified Opinion
Condition and Context
The School Corporation paid $1,467,550 from the COVID-19 - Education Stabilization Fund
program for two improvement projects which exceeded the School Corporation's capitalization threshold.
The improvements were not added to the School Corporation's capital asset listing. Additionally, the School
Corporation completed a capital asset inventory as required; however, because material improvements
were not included in the capital asset listing, it was determined that the School Corporation did not reconcile
differences in the property records as required.
The lack of internal controls and noncompliance were systemic issues throughout the audit period.
Criteria
2 CFR 200.303 states in part:
"The non-Federal entity must:
(a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides
reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance
with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award.
These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal
Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States
or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring
Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ."
2 CFR 200.313(d) states in part:
"Management requirements. Procedures for managing equipment (including replacement
equipment), whether acquired in whole or in part under a Federal award, until disposition takes
place will, as a minimum, meet the following requirements:
(1) Property records must be maintained that include a description of the property, a serial
number or other identification number, the source of funding for the property (including
the FAIN), who holds title, the acquisition date, cost of the property, percentage of
federal participation in the project costs for the federal award under which the property
was acquired, the location, use and condition of the property, and any ultimate disposition
data including the date of disposal and sales price of the property.
(2) A physical inventory of the property must be taken and the results reconciled with the
property records at least once every two years. . . ."
Cause
A proper system of internal controls was not designed by management of the School Corporation,
which would include segregation of key functions. Embedded within a properly designed and implemented
internal control system should be internal controls consisting of policies and procedures. Policies reflect
the School Corporation's management statements of what should be done to effect internal controls, and
procedures should consist of actions that would implement these policies.
Effect
Without the proper implementation of an effectively designed system of internal controls, the
internal control system cannot be capable of effectively preventing, or detecting and correcting, material
noncompliance. As a result, improvements purchased were not properly added to the capital asset listing.
In addition, a reconcilement between the inventory records and the property records were not completed.
Noncompliance with the grant agreement and the compliance requirement could result in the loss
of federal funds to the School Corporation.
Questioned Costs
There were no questioned costs identified.
Recommendation
We recommended that management of the School Corporation establish a proper system of
internal controls and develop policies and procedures to ensure asset records include all assets.
Views of Responsible Officials
For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.