Audit 292086

FY End
2023-06-30
Total Expended
$5.34M
Findings
8
Programs
4
Organization: Goddard College Corporation (VT)
Year: 2023 Accepted: 2024-02-26

Organization Exclusion Status:

Checking exclusion status...

Findings

ID Ref Severity Repeat Requirement
370500 2023-001 Significant Deficiency - E
370501 2023-001 Significant Deficiency - E
370502 2023-001 Significant Deficiency - E
370503 2023-001 Significant Deficiency - E
946942 2023-001 Significant Deficiency - E
946943 2023-001 Significant Deficiency - E
946944 2023-001 Significant Deficiency - E
946945 2023-001 Significant Deficiency - E

Programs

ALN Program Spent Major Findings
84.268 Federal Direct Student Loans $4.73M Yes 1
84.063 Federal Pell Grant Program $327,336 Yes 1
84.038 Federal Perkins Loan Program $192,610 Yes 1
84.007 Federal Supplemental Educational Opportunity Grants $87,854 Yes 1

Contacts

Name Title Type
QELHXTCUAKF1 Doug Kennedy Auditee
8004684888 Matthew Kalil Auditor
No contacts on file

Notes to SEFA

Title: Note 4 - Federal Perkins Loan Program Accounting Policies: Note 1 - Basis of Presentation The accompanying schedule of expenditures of federal awards (the Schedule) includes the federal grant activity of Goddard College Corporation (the College) under programs of the federal government for the year ended June 30, 2023. The information in this Schedule is presented in accordance with the requirements of Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance). Therefore, some amounts presented in this Schedule may differ from amounts presented in, or used in the preparation of, the basic financial statements. Note 2 - Summary of Significant Accounting Policies Expenditures reported on the Schedule are reported on the accrual basis of accounting. Such expenditures are recognized following the cost principles contained in the Uniform Guidance, wherein certain types of expenditures are not allowable or are limited as to reimbursement. De Minimis Rate Used: N Rate Explanation: The College has elected not to use the 10-percent de minimus indirect cost rate allowed under Uniform Guidance. The Federal Perkins Loan Program (ALN No 84.038) is administered directly by the College, and balances and transactions relating to this program are included in the College’s basic financial statements. Loans outstanding at the beginning of the year and loans made during the year are included in the federal expenditures presented in the Schedule. Federal Perkins loans outstanding as of June 30, 2023 totaled $174,657.

Finding Details

Condition: As of the audit period ending June 30, 2023, the College was found to be in non-compliance with the Uniform Guidance (2 CFR 200, Subpart E, Section 200.90). A student (1 of 40 tested) failed to maintain satisfactory academic progress (SAP), was not provided a notice of a probationary period. It was noted that this student was also an employee of the College and proper segregation of duties did not exist. Context: The College has established SAP standards, including credit completion requirements, as outlined in its published financial aid policies. These standards are in accordance with the Uniform Guidance requirements for administering federal financial aid. In addition, the employee in the registrar's office was also the student in question. Cause: The student in question is a member of the registrar’s office, causing a potential conflict of interest or lack of segregation of duties. Effect or Potential Effect: Student did not receive notice of the probationary period. Questioned Costs: None noted. Recommendations: The College should ensure those in the registrars office are not able to award themselves credit. Implement Automated Alerts: Explore the implementation of automated systems to generate alerts when a student's academic progress deviates from the SAP standards, facilitating prompt intervention. Training for Financial Aid Staff: Provide additional training for financial aid staff to ensure a comprehensive understanding of SAP regulations and the importance of strict adherence. Segregation of Duties: The College should establish adequate segregation of duties to ensure a member of the registrar’s office is not also the individual responsible to review their own SAP status.
Condition: As of the audit period ending June 30, 2023, the College was found to be in non-compliance with the Uniform Guidance (2 CFR 200, Subpart E, Section 200.90). A student (1 of 40 tested) failed to maintain satisfactory academic progress (SAP), was not provided a notice of a probationary period. It was noted that this student was also an employee of the College and proper segregation of duties did not exist. Context: The College has established SAP standards, including credit completion requirements, as outlined in its published financial aid policies. These standards are in accordance with the Uniform Guidance requirements for administering federal financial aid. In addition, the employee in the registrar's office was also the student in question. Cause: The student in question is a member of the registrar’s office, causing a potential conflict of interest or lack of segregation of duties. Effect or Potential Effect: Student did not receive notice of the probationary period. Questioned Costs: None noted. Recommendations: The College should ensure those in the registrars office are not able to award themselves credit. Implement Automated Alerts: Explore the implementation of automated systems to generate alerts when a student's academic progress deviates from the SAP standards, facilitating prompt intervention. Training for Financial Aid Staff: Provide additional training for financial aid staff to ensure a comprehensive understanding of SAP regulations and the importance of strict adherence. Segregation of Duties: The College should establish adequate segregation of duties to ensure a member of the registrar’s office is not also the individual responsible to review their own SAP status.
Condition: As of the audit period ending June 30, 2023, the College was found to be in non-compliance with the Uniform Guidance (2 CFR 200, Subpart E, Section 200.90). A student (1 of 40 tested) failed to maintain satisfactory academic progress (SAP), was not provided a notice of a probationary period. It was noted that this student was also an employee of the College and proper segregation of duties did not exist. Context: The College has established SAP standards, including credit completion requirements, as outlined in its published financial aid policies. These standards are in accordance with the Uniform Guidance requirements for administering federal financial aid. In addition, the employee in the registrar's office was also the student in question. Cause: The student in question is a member of the registrar’s office, causing a potential conflict of interest or lack of segregation of duties. Effect or Potential Effect: Student did not receive notice of the probationary period. Questioned Costs: None noted. Recommendations: The College should ensure those in the registrars office are not able to award themselves credit. Implement Automated Alerts: Explore the implementation of automated systems to generate alerts when a student's academic progress deviates from the SAP standards, facilitating prompt intervention. Training for Financial Aid Staff: Provide additional training for financial aid staff to ensure a comprehensive understanding of SAP regulations and the importance of strict adherence. Segregation of Duties: The College should establish adequate segregation of duties to ensure a member of the registrar’s office is not also the individual responsible to review their own SAP status.
Condition: As of the audit period ending June 30, 2023, the College was found to be in non-compliance with the Uniform Guidance (2 CFR 200, Subpart E, Section 200.90). A student (1 of 40 tested) failed to maintain satisfactory academic progress (SAP), was not provided a notice of a probationary period. It was noted that this student was also an employee of the College and proper segregation of duties did not exist. Context: The College has established SAP standards, including credit completion requirements, as outlined in its published financial aid policies. These standards are in accordance with the Uniform Guidance requirements for administering federal financial aid. In addition, the employee in the registrar's office was also the student in question. Cause: The student in question is a member of the registrar’s office, causing a potential conflict of interest or lack of segregation of duties. Effect or Potential Effect: Student did not receive notice of the probationary period. Questioned Costs: None noted. Recommendations: The College should ensure those in the registrars office are not able to award themselves credit. Implement Automated Alerts: Explore the implementation of automated systems to generate alerts when a student's academic progress deviates from the SAP standards, facilitating prompt intervention. Training for Financial Aid Staff: Provide additional training for financial aid staff to ensure a comprehensive understanding of SAP regulations and the importance of strict adherence. Segregation of Duties: The College should establish adequate segregation of duties to ensure a member of the registrar’s office is not also the individual responsible to review their own SAP status.
Condition: As of the audit period ending June 30, 2023, the College was found to be in non-compliance with the Uniform Guidance (2 CFR 200, Subpart E, Section 200.90). A student (1 of 40 tested) failed to maintain satisfactory academic progress (SAP), was not provided a notice of a probationary period. It was noted that this student was also an employee of the College and proper segregation of duties did not exist. Context: The College has established SAP standards, including credit completion requirements, as outlined in its published financial aid policies. These standards are in accordance with the Uniform Guidance requirements for administering federal financial aid. In addition, the employee in the registrar's office was also the student in question. Cause: The student in question is a member of the registrar’s office, causing a potential conflict of interest or lack of segregation of duties. Effect or Potential Effect: Student did not receive notice of the probationary period. Questioned Costs: None noted. Recommendations: The College should ensure those in the registrars office are not able to award themselves credit. Implement Automated Alerts: Explore the implementation of automated systems to generate alerts when a student's academic progress deviates from the SAP standards, facilitating prompt intervention. Training for Financial Aid Staff: Provide additional training for financial aid staff to ensure a comprehensive understanding of SAP regulations and the importance of strict adherence. Segregation of Duties: The College should establish adequate segregation of duties to ensure a member of the registrar’s office is not also the individual responsible to review their own SAP status.
Condition: As of the audit period ending June 30, 2023, the College was found to be in non-compliance with the Uniform Guidance (2 CFR 200, Subpart E, Section 200.90). A student (1 of 40 tested) failed to maintain satisfactory academic progress (SAP), was not provided a notice of a probationary period. It was noted that this student was also an employee of the College and proper segregation of duties did not exist. Context: The College has established SAP standards, including credit completion requirements, as outlined in its published financial aid policies. These standards are in accordance with the Uniform Guidance requirements for administering federal financial aid. In addition, the employee in the registrar's office was also the student in question. Cause: The student in question is a member of the registrar’s office, causing a potential conflict of interest or lack of segregation of duties. Effect or Potential Effect: Student did not receive notice of the probationary period. Questioned Costs: None noted. Recommendations: The College should ensure those in the registrars office are not able to award themselves credit. Implement Automated Alerts: Explore the implementation of automated systems to generate alerts when a student's academic progress deviates from the SAP standards, facilitating prompt intervention. Training for Financial Aid Staff: Provide additional training for financial aid staff to ensure a comprehensive understanding of SAP regulations and the importance of strict adherence. Segregation of Duties: The College should establish adequate segregation of duties to ensure a member of the registrar’s office is not also the individual responsible to review their own SAP status.
Condition: As of the audit period ending June 30, 2023, the College was found to be in non-compliance with the Uniform Guidance (2 CFR 200, Subpart E, Section 200.90). A student (1 of 40 tested) failed to maintain satisfactory academic progress (SAP), was not provided a notice of a probationary period. It was noted that this student was also an employee of the College and proper segregation of duties did not exist. Context: The College has established SAP standards, including credit completion requirements, as outlined in its published financial aid policies. These standards are in accordance with the Uniform Guidance requirements for administering federal financial aid. In addition, the employee in the registrar's office was also the student in question. Cause: The student in question is a member of the registrar’s office, causing a potential conflict of interest or lack of segregation of duties. Effect or Potential Effect: Student did not receive notice of the probationary period. Questioned Costs: None noted. Recommendations: The College should ensure those in the registrars office are not able to award themselves credit. Implement Automated Alerts: Explore the implementation of automated systems to generate alerts when a student's academic progress deviates from the SAP standards, facilitating prompt intervention. Training for Financial Aid Staff: Provide additional training for financial aid staff to ensure a comprehensive understanding of SAP regulations and the importance of strict adherence. Segregation of Duties: The College should establish adequate segregation of duties to ensure a member of the registrar’s office is not also the individual responsible to review their own SAP status.
Condition: As of the audit period ending June 30, 2023, the College was found to be in non-compliance with the Uniform Guidance (2 CFR 200, Subpart E, Section 200.90). A student (1 of 40 tested) failed to maintain satisfactory academic progress (SAP), was not provided a notice of a probationary period. It was noted that this student was also an employee of the College and proper segregation of duties did not exist. Context: The College has established SAP standards, including credit completion requirements, as outlined in its published financial aid policies. These standards are in accordance with the Uniform Guidance requirements for administering federal financial aid. In addition, the employee in the registrar's office was also the student in question. Cause: The student in question is a member of the registrar’s office, causing a potential conflict of interest or lack of segregation of duties. Effect or Potential Effect: Student did not receive notice of the probationary period. Questioned Costs: None noted. Recommendations: The College should ensure those in the registrars office are not able to award themselves credit. Implement Automated Alerts: Explore the implementation of automated systems to generate alerts when a student's academic progress deviates from the SAP standards, facilitating prompt intervention. Training for Financial Aid Staff: Provide additional training for financial aid staff to ensure a comprehensive understanding of SAP regulations and the importance of strict adherence. Segregation of Duties: The College should establish adequate segregation of duties to ensure a member of the registrar’s office is not also the individual responsible to review their own SAP status.