Audit 289551

FY End
2023-06-30
Total Expended
$4.47M
Findings
6
Programs
10
Organization: Huntingdon Area School District (PA)
Year: 2023 Accepted: 2024-02-08

Organization Exclusion Status:

Checking exclusion status...

Findings

ID Ref Severity Repeat Requirement
366651 2023-001 Material Weakness - N
366652 2023-001 Material Weakness - N
366653 2023-001 Material Weakness - N
943093 2023-001 Material Weakness - N
943094 2023-001 Material Weakness - N
943095 2023-001 Material Weakness - N

Programs

ALN Program Spent Major Findings
10.555 National School Lunch Program $542,724 Yes 0
10.553 School Breakfast Program $134,327 Yes 0
84.010 Title I Grants to Local Educational Agencies $119,426 - 0
84.367 Improving Teacher Quality State Grants $66,901 - 0
84.027 Special Education_grants to States $50,000 - 0
93.778 Medical Assistance Program $17,055 - 0
84.425 Education Stabilization Fund $15,426 Yes 1
84.173 Special Education_preschool Grants $7,111 - 0
84.424 Student Support and Academic Enrichment Program $3,124 - 0
10.649 Pandemic Ebt Administrative Costs $628 - 0

Contacts

Name Title Type
KPA2ECH2JDP6 Mindy Stuck Auditee
8146412120 David M. Scott, CPA Auditor
No contacts on file

Notes to SEFA

Title: Basis of Accounting Accounting Policies: The Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards has been prepared on the accrual basis of accounting. Revenues were adjusted to balance the expenditures incurred for each project. Expenditures reported on the schedule are reported on the accrual basis of accounting. Such expenditures are recognized following the cost principles contained in the Uniform Guidance, wherein certain types of expenditures are not allowable or are limited as to reimbursement. The Huntingdon Area School District has elected to not use the 10% de minimis indirect cost rate allowed under the Uniform Guidance. De Minimis Rate Used: N Rate Explanation: The Huntingdon Area School District has elected to not use the 10% de minimis indirect cost rate allowed under the Uniform Guidance. The Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards has been prepared on the accrual basis of accounting. Revenues were adjusted to balance the expenditures incurred for each project.
Title: Summary of Significant Accounting Policies Accounting Policies: The Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards has been prepared on the accrual basis of accounting. Revenues were adjusted to balance the expenditures incurred for each project. Expenditures reported on the schedule are reported on the accrual basis of accounting. Such expenditures are recognized following the cost principles contained in the Uniform Guidance, wherein certain types of expenditures are not allowable or are limited as to reimbursement. The Huntingdon Area School District has elected to not use the 10% de minimis indirect cost rate allowed under the Uniform Guidance. De Minimis Rate Used: N Rate Explanation: The Huntingdon Area School District has elected to not use the 10% de minimis indirect cost rate allowed under the Uniform Guidance. Expenditures reported on the schedule are reported on the accural basis of accounting. Such expenditures are recognized following the cost principles contained in the Uniform Guidance, wherein certain types of expenditures are not allowable or are limited as to reimbursement. The Huntingdon Area School District has elected to not use the 10% de minimis indirect cost rate allowed under the Uniform Guidance.
Title: Major Federal Programs Accounting Policies: The Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards has been prepared on the accrual basis of accounting. Revenues were adjusted to balance the expenditures incurred for each project. Expenditures reported on the schedule are reported on the accrual basis of accounting. Such expenditures are recognized following the cost principles contained in the Uniform Guidance, wherein certain types of expenditures are not allowable or are limited as to reimbursement. The Huntingdon Area School District has elected to not use the 10% de minimis indirect cost rate allowed under the Uniform Guidance. De Minimis Rate Used: N Rate Explanation: The Huntingdon Area School District has elected to not use the 10% de minimis indirect cost rate allowed under the Uniform Guidance. An extensive compliance test, as required by Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 200 Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance) was performed on the Education Stabilization Fund and Child Nutrition Cluster programs which represents 74.30% of the total expenditures reflected on the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards. The Education Stabilization Fund and Child Nutrition Cluster programs exceed $894,344 and, therefore, represent the only programs to which the specific compliance requirements must be applied.
Title: In-Kind Federal Support Accounting Policies: The Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards has been prepared on the accrual basis of accounting. Revenues were adjusted to balance the expenditures incurred for each project. Expenditures reported on the schedule are reported on the accrual basis of accounting. Such expenditures are recognized following the cost principles contained in the Uniform Guidance, wherein certain types of expenditures are not allowable or are limited as to reimbursement. The Huntingdon Area School District has elected to not use the 10% de minimis indirect cost rate allowed under the Uniform Guidance. De Minimis Rate Used: N Rate Explanation: The Huntingdon Area School District has elected to not use the 10% de minimis indirect cost rate allowed under the Uniform Guidance. USDA Donated Commodities are valued at market value, which represents the costs to replace those commodities.

Finding Details

Material Weakness in Internal Control Over Compliance Finding 2023-001 Prevailing Wage Rates Education Stabilization Fund Condition: The Huntingdon Area School District does not have internal control procedures designed and implemented for the review of federal prevailing wage rate requirements. Criteria: Best practices related to federal programs would dictate to have internal control procedures designed and implemented for the review of prevailing wage rate requirements. Cause: There was a lack of appropriate internal control procedures designed and implemented Effect: This could potentially result in noncompliance with federal prevailing wage rate requirements. Recommendation: We recommend that the district design and implement documented internal control procedures for the review of federal prevailing wage rate requirements.
Material Weakness in Internal Control Over Compliance Finding 2023-001 Prevailing Wage Rates Education Stabilization Fund Condition: The Huntingdon Area School District does not have internal control procedures designed and implemented for the review of federal prevailing wage rate requirements. Criteria: Best practices related to federal programs would dictate to have internal control procedures designed and implemented for the review of prevailing wage rate requirements. Cause: There was a lack of appropriate internal control procedures designed and implemented Effect: This could potentially result in noncompliance with federal prevailing wage rate requirements. Recommendation: We recommend that the district design and implement documented internal control procedures for the review of federal prevailing wage rate requirements.
Material Weakness in Internal Control Over Compliance Finding 2023-001 Prevailing Wage Rates Education Stabilization Fund Condition: The Huntingdon Area School District does not have internal control procedures designed and implemented for the review of federal prevailing wage rate requirements. Criteria: Best practices related to federal programs would dictate to have internal control procedures designed and implemented for the review of prevailing wage rate requirements. Cause: There was a lack of appropriate internal control procedures designed and implemented Effect: This could potentially result in noncompliance with federal prevailing wage rate requirements. Recommendation: We recommend that the district design and implement documented internal control procedures for the review of federal prevailing wage rate requirements.
Material Weakness in Internal Control Over Compliance Finding 2023-001 Prevailing Wage Rates Education Stabilization Fund Condition: The Huntingdon Area School District does not have internal control procedures designed and implemented for the review of federal prevailing wage rate requirements. Criteria: Best practices related to federal programs would dictate to have internal control procedures designed and implemented for the review of prevailing wage rate requirements. Cause: There was a lack of appropriate internal control procedures designed and implemented Effect: This could potentially result in noncompliance with federal prevailing wage rate requirements. Recommendation: We recommend that the district design and implement documented internal control procedures for the review of federal prevailing wage rate requirements.
Material Weakness in Internal Control Over Compliance Finding 2023-001 Prevailing Wage Rates Education Stabilization Fund Condition: The Huntingdon Area School District does not have internal control procedures designed and implemented for the review of federal prevailing wage rate requirements. Criteria: Best practices related to federal programs would dictate to have internal control procedures designed and implemented for the review of prevailing wage rate requirements. Cause: There was a lack of appropriate internal control procedures designed and implemented Effect: This could potentially result in noncompliance with federal prevailing wage rate requirements. Recommendation: We recommend that the district design and implement documented internal control procedures for the review of federal prevailing wage rate requirements.
Material Weakness in Internal Control Over Compliance Finding 2023-001 Prevailing Wage Rates Education Stabilization Fund Condition: The Huntingdon Area School District does not have internal control procedures designed and implemented for the review of federal prevailing wage rate requirements. Criteria: Best practices related to federal programs would dictate to have internal control procedures designed and implemented for the review of prevailing wage rate requirements. Cause: There was a lack of appropriate internal control procedures designed and implemented Effect: This could potentially result in noncompliance with federal prevailing wage rate requirements. Recommendation: We recommend that the district design and implement documented internal control procedures for the review of federal prevailing wage rate requirements.