Audit 27650

FY End
2022-06-30
Total Expended
$1.13M
Findings
2
Programs
2
Year: 2022 Accepted: 2023-03-30
Auditor: Rbt CPAS

Organization Exclusion Status:

Checking exclusion status...

Findings

ID Ref Severity Repeat Requirement
36673 2022-001 Material Weakness - E
613115 2022-001 Material Weakness - E

Programs

ALN Program Spent Major Findings
14.850 Public and Indian Housing $829,599 Yes 1
14.872 Public Housing Capital Fund $300,169 - 0

Contacts

Name Title Type
X8MUM3TPBM45 Keith Burrell Auditee
8453527677 Joseph Montalto Auditor
No contacts on file

Notes to SEFA

Accounting Policies: I.SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIESThe accompanying Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards includes the federal grant activity of the Village of Spring Valley Housing Authority (the Authority) for the year ended June 30, 2022. Federal awards received directly from Federal agencies as well as Federal awards passed through other government agencies are included in the schedule. The information in this schedule is presented in accordance with the requirements of Title 2, U.S. Code of Federal Regulations, Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance). Because the Schedule presents only a selected portion of the operations of the Authority, it is not intended to and does not present the financial position, changes in net position, or cash flows of the Authority. Expenditures reported on the Schedule are reported on the accrual basis of accounting. Such expenditures are recognized following the cost principles contained in the Uniform Guidance, wherein certain types of expenditures are not allowable or are limited as to reimbursement.II.INDIRECT COST RATEThe Authority has not elected to use the 10 percent de minimis indirect cost rate as allowed under the Uniform Guidance.III.RECONCILIATION TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTSThe expenditures presented in the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards reconcile to the federal aid reported in the Statement of Revenues, Expenses and Changes in Net Position as follows: Federal Expenditures as reported in the SEFA: $1,129,769 Reconciling items: None - Government Operating Grants as reported in the Statement of Revenues, Expenses, and Changes in Net Position: $1,129,768 De Minimis Rate Used: N Rate Explanation: The auditee did not use the de minimis cost rate.

Finding Details

Findings and Questioned Costs for Federal Awards 2022-001 ? Eligibility U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development 14.850 ? Public and Indian Housing Condition: During the audit, it was noted that out of 15 tenant files reviewed for the Public and Indian Housing program, 5 files were missing a signed form HUD-9886, 10 files did not have third-party income verification complete, 3 files did not have a signed lease or lease addendum signed, and 3 files had a lease or lease addendum signed four to seven months after the new rent took effect. Circumstances surrounding the recertification process have been affected by the COVID-19 pandemic and the resulting rent moratorium. Existing controls were designed with the expectation that if the participant did not comply with their end of the process, they would be removed from the program, and the Authority would still be compliant. Since the rent moratorium removed the Authority?s ability to evict tenants, the existing controls, although functioning, were not sufficient to ensure the Authority complied with the eligibility requirement to account for this unique situation. Criteria: As a condition of admission or continued occupancy, PHAs must require the tenant and applicable family members to provide necessary information and releases for the PHA to verify income eligibility, obtain and document the family file third-party verification of reported family income, and reexamine family income at least once every 12 months and adjust the tenant rent as necessary. Cause: The Authority did not adjust their controls over eligibility to ensure compliance requirements were met. Effect: Potential loss of funding due to noncompliance. Questioned Costs: None identified. Perspective: Based on the number of tenant files with findings, we believe this is a systemic event. Repeat Finding: Not a repeat finding. Recommendation: We recommend that the Authority establishes processes and controls which ensure eligibility requirements are met. Auditee?s Response and Corrective Action Plan: See corrective action plan.
Findings and Questioned Costs for Federal Awards 2022-001 ? Eligibility U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development 14.850 ? Public and Indian Housing Condition: During the audit, it was noted that out of 15 tenant files reviewed for the Public and Indian Housing program, 5 files were missing a signed form HUD-9886, 10 files did not have third-party income verification complete, 3 files did not have a signed lease or lease addendum signed, and 3 files had a lease or lease addendum signed four to seven months after the new rent took effect. Circumstances surrounding the recertification process have been affected by the COVID-19 pandemic and the resulting rent moratorium. Existing controls were designed with the expectation that if the participant did not comply with their end of the process, they would be removed from the program, and the Authority would still be compliant. Since the rent moratorium removed the Authority?s ability to evict tenants, the existing controls, although functioning, were not sufficient to ensure the Authority complied with the eligibility requirement to account for this unique situation. Criteria: As a condition of admission or continued occupancy, PHAs must require the tenant and applicable family members to provide necessary information and releases for the PHA to verify income eligibility, obtain and document the family file third-party verification of reported family income, and reexamine family income at least once every 12 months and adjust the tenant rent as necessary. Cause: The Authority did not adjust their controls over eligibility to ensure compliance requirements were met. Effect: Potential loss of funding due to noncompliance. Questioned Costs: None identified. Perspective: Based on the number of tenant files with findings, we believe this is a systemic event. Repeat Finding: Not a repeat finding. Recommendation: We recommend that the Authority establishes processes and controls which ensure eligibility requirements are met. Auditee?s Response and Corrective Action Plan: See corrective action plan.