Audit 24020

FY End
2022-09-30
Total Expended
$1.13M
Findings
4
Programs
3
Year: 2022 Accepted: 2023-05-22

Organization Exclusion Status:

Checking exclusion status...

Findings

ID Ref Severity Repeat Requirement
35196 2022-005 Significant Deficiency - P
35197 2022-006 Significant Deficiency - L
611638 2022-005 Significant Deficiency - P
611639 2022-006 Significant Deficiency - L

Programs

ALN Program Spent Major Findings
14.850 Public and Indian Housing $19,864 - 0
14.871 Section 8 Housing Choice Vouchers $13,688 Yes 0
14.872 Public Housing Capital Fund $6,884 - 0

Contacts

Name Title Type
J9X4L2R28VE7 Matt Brady Auditee
6202251965 Shoaib Khar Auditor
No contacts on file

Notes to SEFA

Accounting Policies: NOTE 1 BASIS OF PRESENTATIONThe accompanying Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (Schedule) includes the federal grant activity of theHousing Authority of the City of Dodge City, Kansas (Authority) under programs of the federal government for theyear ended September 30, 2022. The information in this Schedule is presented in accordance with the requirementsof Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, andAudit Requirements of Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance). Because the Schedule presents only a selected portionof the operations of the Authority, it is not intended to and does not present the financial position, changes in netposition, or cash flows of the Authority.NOTE 2 SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIESExpenditures reported on the Schedule are reported on the accrual basis of accounting. Such expenditures arerecognized following the cost principles contained in the Uniform Guidance, wherein certain types of expendituresare not allowable or are limited as to reimbursement. The Authority has elected not to use the 10-percent de minimisindirect cost rate as allowed under the Uniform Guidance. De Minimis Rate Used: N Rate Explanation: The auditee did not use the de minimis cost rate.

Finding Details

2022-005. Significant Audit Adjustments Criteria: The Authority should take the steps necessary to ensure accuracy and completeness of the financial statements. Condition: This audit required a number of significant adjusting journal entries. These entries were necessary because certain unadjusted general ledger accounts were incorrect and/or not recorded correctly. Questioned Costs: None noted. Effect: The PHA?s financial statements before any adjusting entries contained errors and/or were not properly recorded. Cause: This appears to be an oversight by the Authority. Recommendation: I recommend that the Authority exercise more care in processing and recording transactions and that more care be taken to ensure the completeness of financial reporting. Management?s Response: We cannot say whether this is a problem caused by the Dodge City Housing Authority or if it lies with our fee accountant. At the end of every fiscal year, we have a close-out process that includes a questionnaire from our fee accountant on several expense areas (compensated absences, allowance for doubtful accounts, end of year investment balances, inventory, etc.). Apparently, they did not use that information in our end of year accounting. This resulted in our auditor having to make many end of the year adjusting journal entries for our Agency. I had all of the information in our budget file, and it looked as though I had sent it to our fee accountant, however, they apparently did not receive it and use it to complete their end of year accounting for us. We will be sure to follow up with our fee accountant from this point forward to make sure they receive what we send at the end of the year.
2022-006 SEMAP Supporting Documentation Criteria: SEMAP indicators should be supported by sufficient documentation. Condition: I noted that certain indicators appearing on the September 30, 2022, SEMAP certification could not be verified as they were either not supported by adequate documentation or no quality control work were performed to substantiate PHA?s response. Questioned Costs: None noted. Effect: Responses on SEMAP certification may not be an accurate representation of PHA?s FY 2022 submission. Cause: Proper internal control procedures relating to SEMAP were not performed or maintained for SEMAP certification. Recommendation: I recommend that the Authority implement and perfect the procedures necessary to provide accurate and complete supporting documentation for future SEMAP certification. Management?s Response: We hired a new Maintenance Director near the end of FY 2022. We did not get him trained on HQS regulations prior to the end of FY 2022. Normally our old Maintenance Director would have done the inspections with me in the summer of FY 2022. He retired in May of 2022 and our new Director did not come on until July of 2022. He has since been trained in HQS and will be conducting our quality control HQS inspections with me this summer on the 4 units we must do quality control inspections on.
2022-005. Significant Audit Adjustments Criteria: The Authority should take the steps necessary to ensure accuracy and completeness of the financial statements. Condition: This audit required a number of significant adjusting journal entries. These entries were necessary because certain unadjusted general ledger accounts were incorrect and/or not recorded correctly. Questioned Costs: None noted. Effect: The PHA?s financial statements before any adjusting entries contained errors and/or were not properly recorded. Cause: This appears to be an oversight by the Authority. Recommendation: I recommend that the Authority exercise more care in processing and recording transactions and that more care be taken to ensure the completeness of financial reporting. Management?s Response: We cannot say whether this is a problem caused by the Dodge City Housing Authority or if it lies with our fee accountant. At the end of every fiscal year, we have a close-out process that includes a questionnaire from our fee accountant on several expense areas (compensated absences, allowance for doubtful accounts, end of year investment balances, inventory, etc.). Apparently, they did not use that information in our end of year accounting. This resulted in our auditor having to make many end of the year adjusting journal entries for our Agency. I had all of the information in our budget file, and it looked as though I had sent it to our fee accountant, however, they apparently did not receive it and use it to complete their end of year accounting for us. We will be sure to follow up with our fee accountant from this point forward to make sure they receive what we send at the end of the year.
2022-006 SEMAP Supporting Documentation Criteria: SEMAP indicators should be supported by sufficient documentation. Condition: I noted that certain indicators appearing on the September 30, 2022, SEMAP certification could not be verified as they were either not supported by adequate documentation or no quality control work were performed to substantiate PHA?s response. Questioned Costs: None noted. Effect: Responses on SEMAP certification may not be an accurate representation of PHA?s FY 2022 submission. Cause: Proper internal control procedures relating to SEMAP were not performed or maintained for SEMAP certification. Recommendation: I recommend that the Authority implement and perfect the procedures necessary to provide accurate and complete supporting documentation for future SEMAP certification. Management?s Response: We hired a new Maintenance Director near the end of FY 2022. We did not get him trained on HQS regulations prior to the end of FY 2022. Normally our old Maintenance Director would have done the inspections with me in the summer of FY 2022. He retired in May of 2022 and our new Director did not come on until July of 2022. He has since been trained in HQS and will be conducting our quality control HQS inspections with me this summer on the 4 units we must do quality control inspections on.