Audit 20450

FY End
2022-06-30
Total Expended
$1.89M
Findings
4
Programs
13
Year: 2022 Accepted: 2023-01-31

Organization Exclusion Status:

Checking exclusion status...

Findings

ID Ref Severity Repeat Requirement
16542 2022-001 Significant Deficiency - B
16543 2022-001 Significant Deficiency - B
592984 2022-001 Significant Deficiency - B
592985 2022-001 Significant Deficiency - B

Contacts

Name Title Type
ENUSJRB5N543 Elsie Perez Auditee
6104193120 Hank Miller, CPA Auditor
No contacts on file

Notes to SEFA

Title: Basis of Presentation Accounting Policies: The accompanying Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards is presented on the modified accrualbasis of accounting for all federal awards charged to governmental funds and on the accrual basis ofaccounting for all federal awards charged to proprietary funds, as contemplated by accounting principles,generally accepted in the United States of America. De Minimis Rate Used: N Rate Explanation: The auditee did not use the de minimis cost rate. The accompanying Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (the Schedule) includes the federalaward activity of Lehigh Valley Dual Language Charter School under programs of the federal governmentfor the year ended June 30, 2022. The information in this schedule is presented in accordance with therequirements of the Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200, Uniform AdministrativeRequirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance). Becausethe Schedule presents only a selected portion of the operations of Lehigh Valley Dual Language CharterSchool, it is not intended to and does not present the financial position, changes in net assets, or cashflows of Lehigh Valley Dual Language Charter School.
Title: Organization and Scope Accounting Policies: The accompanying Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards is presented on the modified accrualbasis of accounting for all federal awards charged to governmental funds and on the accrual basis ofaccounting for all federal awards charged to proprietary funds, as contemplated by accounting principles,generally accepted in the United States of America. De Minimis Rate Used: N Rate Explanation: The auditee did not use the de minimis cost rate. The School recognized 8.1% of its total general fund revenue in federal awards, and 97.1% of its totalenterprise fund revenue.
Title: Program Disclosure - Footnotes Accounting Policies: The accompanying Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards is presented on the modified accrualbasis of accounting for all federal awards charged to governmental funds and on the accrual basis ofaccounting for all federal awards charged to proprietary funds, as contemplated by accounting principles,generally accepted in the United States of America. De Minimis Rate Used: N Rate Explanation: The auditee did not use the de minimis cost rate. 1. The federal award, passed through the Colonial I.U. #20, under the U.S. Department ofEducation heading, is part of a consortium of participating school districts. In accordance withdirections from the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, these awards are reported on the basicfinancial statements as local source revenue. 2. The Federal Grants were passed through the following entities in the totals below: "See the Notes to the SEFA for chart/table" 3. Of the $386,624 of federal expenditures reported for the ESSER II grant, $27,995 wereincurred in the prior fiscal year. "See the Notes to the SEFA for chart/table"

Finding Details

Finding No. 2022-001 (Cost Segregation) Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency Federal Program: Education Stabilization Fund ALN: 84.425D; 84.425U Federal Award Year: 2020, 2021 Federal Agency: Department of Education Pass-thru entity: PA Department of Education Pass-thru nos. FA-200-21-1091; FA-225-21-1091; 223-21-1091 Questioned Costs: N/A Repeat Finding: No Type of Compliance Requirement: Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Criteria: Federal Agencies issuing grants to schools, require all federal transactions to be segregated from non-federal transactions. In addition, each federal grant requires its costs to be segregated from other federal grants. This segregation usually occurs by using a source code as established by the PDE Chart of Accounts. Condition: The Charter School does not segregate federal grant expenditures within the accounting software instead choosing to track the expenditures for each grant in excel. During our audit, we found inconsistencies with where expenditures were reported in the excel spreadsheet and where they were recorded in the software. Cause: The Charter School uses QuickBooks for its accounting software and does not segregate the expenditures for each federal grant within the software itself. The School was tracking the expenditures in excel by the original grant budget code instead of by the actual expenditure account codes. Effect: Failure to correctly identify and segregate expenditures can lead to reporting errors. Context: We reviewed the expenditures in the client?s excel tracker and compared the total amount of expenditures by major function-object to the client?s trial balance to verify the expenditures existed in those accounts. We noted an instance of a specific teacher?s salary in the workbook was reported as 1100-100 when their salary was recorded to the 1400 function series. We also noted an expense of $3,950 that was reclassed to the Title II grant but was not removed from the excel tracker. Recommendation: We recommend the School utilize a more appropriate software for fund accounting that will allow for the segregation of federal grant expenditures directly in the software using a distinct source code for each grant in accordance with the PDE Chart of Accounts. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: The Charter School agrees with the finding and the recommended procedures have been implemented.
Finding No. 2022-001 (Cost Segregation) Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency Federal Program: Education Stabilization Fund ALN: 84.425D; 84.425U Federal Award Year: 2020, 2021 Federal Agency: Department of Education Pass-thru entity: PA Department of Education Pass-thru nos. FA-200-21-1091; FA-225-21-1091; 223-21-1091 Questioned Costs: N/A Repeat Finding: No Type of Compliance Requirement: Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Criteria: Federal Agencies issuing grants to schools, require all federal transactions to be segregated from non-federal transactions. In addition, each federal grant requires its costs to be segregated from other federal grants. This segregation usually occurs by using a source code as established by the PDE Chart of Accounts. Condition: The Charter School does not segregate federal grant expenditures within the accounting software instead choosing to track the expenditures for each grant in excel. During our audit, we found inconsistencies with where expenditures were reported in the excel spreadsheet and where they were recorded in the software. Cause: The Charter School uses QuickBooks for its accounting software and does not segregate the expenditures for each federal grant within the software itself. The School was tracking the expenditures in excel by the original grant budget code instead of by the actual expenditure account codes. Effect: Failure to correctly identify and segregate expenditures can lead to reporting errors. Context: We reviewed the expenditures in the client?s excel tracker and compared the total amount of expenditures by major function-object to the client?s trial balance to verify the expenditures existed in those accounts. We noted an instance of a specific teacher?s salary in the workbook was reported as 1100-100 when their salary was recorded to the 1400 function series. We also noted an expense of $3,950 that was reclassed to the Title II grant but was not removed from the excel tracker. Recommendation: We recommend the School utilize a more appropriate software for fund accounting that will allow for the segregation of federal grant expenditures directly in the software using a distinct source code for each grant in accordance with the PDE Chart of Accounts. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: The Charter School agrees with the finding and the recommended procedures have been implemented.
Finding No. 2022-001 (Cost Segregation) Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency Federal Program: Education Stabilization Fund ALN: 84.425D; 84.425U Federal Award Year: 2020, 2021 Federal Agency: Department of Education Pass-thru entity: PA Department of Education Pass-thru nos. FA-200-21-1091; FA-225-21-1091; 223-21-1091 Questioned Costs: N/A Repeat Finding: No Type of Compliance Requirement: Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Criteria: Federal Agencies issuing grants to schools, require all federal transactions to be segregated from non-federal transactions. In addition, each federal grant requires its costs to be segregated from other federal grants. This segregation usually occurs by using a source code as established by the PDE Chart of Accounts. Condition: The Charter School does not segregate federal grant expenditures within the accounting software instead choosing to track the expenditures for each grant in excel. During our audit, we found inconsistencies with where expenditures were reported in the excel spreadsheet and where they were recorded in the software. Cause: The Charter School uses QuickBooks for its accounting software and does not segregate the expenditures for each federal grant within the software itself. The School was tracking the expenditures in excel by the original grant budget code instead of by the actual expenditure account codes. Effect: Failure to correctly identify and segregate expenditures can lead to reporting errors. Context: We reviewed the expenditures in the client?s excel tracker and compared the total amount of expenditures by major function-object to the client?s trial balance to verify the expenditures existed in those accounts. We noted an instance of a specific teacher?s salary in the workbook was reported as 1100-100 when their salary was recorded to the 1400 function series. We also noted an expense of $3,950 that was reclassed to the Title II grant but was not removed from the excel tracker. Recommendation: We recommend the School utilize a more appropriate software for fund accounting that will allow for the segregation of federal grant expenditures directly in the software using a distinct source code for each grant in accordance with the PDE Chart of Accounts. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: The Charter School agrees with the finding and the recommended procedures have been implemented.
Finding No. 2022-001 (Cost Segregation) Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency Federal Program: Education Stabilization Fund ALN: 84.425D; 84.425U Federal Award Year: 2020, 2021 Federal Agency: Department of Education Pass-thru entity: PA Department of Education Pass-thru nos. FA-200-21-1091; FA-225-21-1091; 223-21-1091 Questioned Costs: N/A Repeat Finding: No Type of Compliance Requirement: Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Criteria: Federal Agencies issuing grants to schools, require all federal transactions to be segregated from non-federal transactions. In addition, each federal grant requires its costs to be segregated from other federal grants. This segregation usually occurs by using a source code as established by the PDE Chart of Accounts. Condition: The Charter School does not segregate federal grant expenditures within the accounting software instead choosing to track the expenditures for each grant in excel. During our audit, we found inconsistencies with where expenditures were reported in the excel spreadsheet and where they were recorded in the software. Cause: The Charter School uses QuickBooks for its accounting software and does not segregate the expenditures for each federal grant within the software itself. The School was tracking the expenditures in excel by the original grant budget code instead of by the actual expenditure account codes. Effect: Failure to correctly identify and segregate expenditures can lead to reporting errors. Context: We reviewed the expenditures in the client?s excel tracker and compared the total amount of expenditures by major function-object to the client?s trial balance to verify the expenditures existed in those accounts. We noted an instance of a specific teacher?s salary in the workbook was reported as 1100-100 when their salary was recorded to the 1400 function series. We also noted an expense of $3,950 that was reclassed to the Title II grant but was not removed from the excel tracker. Recommendation: We recommend the School utilize a more appropriate software for fund accounting that will allow for the segregation of federal grant expenditures directly in the software using a distinct source code for each grant in accordance with the PDE Chart of Accounts. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: The Charter School agrees with the finding and the recommended procedures have been implemented.