Audit 17996

FY End
2022-06-30
Total Expended
$19.19M
Findings
2
Programs
2
Year: 2022 Accepted: 2023-03-19

Organization Exclusion Status:

Checking exclusion status...

Findings

ID Ref Severity Repeat Requirement
19883 2022-001 Significant Deficiency - N
596325 2022-001 Significant Deficiency - N

Programs

ALN Program Spent Major Findings
14.871 Section 8 Housing Choice Vouchers $19.13M Yes 1
14.896 Family Self-Sufficiency Program $59,785 - 0

Contacts

Name Title Type
T4N2BXYJV419 Jeremy Erling Auditee
8437471793 Chad Porter Auditor
No contacts on file

Notes to SEFA

Accounting Policies: 1) Summary of Significant Accounting Policies Applicable to the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal AwardsScope of PresentationThe accompanying schedule presents the expenditures incurred (and related awards received) by the North Charleston Housing Authority (Authority) that are reimbursable under federal programs of federal agencies providing financial assistance and state awards. For the purposes of this schedule, only the portion of program expenditures reimbursable with such federal or state funds is reported in the accompanying schedule. Program expenditures in excess of the maximum federal or state reimbursement authorized or the portion of the program expenditures that were funded with local or other nonfederal funds are excluded from the accompanying schedule.Basis of AccountingThe expenditures included in the accompanying schedule were reported on the accrual basis of accounting. Expenditures are recognized in the accounting period in which the related liability is incurred. Expenditures reported included any property or equipment acquisitions incurred under the federal program. The information in this schedule is presented in accordance with the requirements of Uniform Guidance, Audit of States, Local Governments, and Non-Profit Organizations. Therefore, some amounts presented in this schedule may differ from amounts presented in or used in the preparation of the basic financial statements.Indirect Cost RateThe Authority elected not to use the 10% de minimis indirect cost rate as allowed in the Uniform Guidance, section 414. De Minimis Rate Used: N Rate Explanation: The auditee did not use the de minimis cost rate.

Finding Details

Program Name Section 8 Housing Choice Vouchers Significant Deficiency CFDA Number 14.871 N - Special Test 2022-001 Housing Quality Inspection Criteria The PHA must inspect the unit leased to a family at least bi-annually to determine if the unit meets Housing Quality Standards (HQS) and the PHA must conduct quality control re-inspections. The PHA must prepare a unit inspection report (24 CFR ??982.405, 983.103)). Additionally, for units under HAP contract that fail to meet HQS, the PHA must require the owner to correct any life threatening HQS deficiencies within 24 hours after the inspections and all other HQS deficiencies within 30 calendar days or within a specified PHA-approved extension. If the owner does not correct the cited HQS deficiencies within the specified correction period, the PHA must stop (abate) HAPs beginning no later than the first of the month following the specified correction period or must terminate the HAP contract. The owner is not responsible for a breach of HQS as a result of the family?s failure to pay for utilities for which the family is responsible under the lease or for tenant damage. For family-caused defects, if the family does not correct the cited HQS deficiencies within the specified correction period, the PHA must take prompt and vigorous action to enforce the family obligations (24 CFR sections 982.158(d) and 982.404). Condition During our audit, we noted errors in files the did not receive or was not documented that a follow up inspection was performed for a failed inspeaction. We also noted that tenant files were not inspected (or documenation of inspection) with in the bi-annual time frame. Context We selected a sample of 40 inspections that occurred during the fiscal year. Out of the sample 8 tenant files did not complete the required bi-annual inspection that was required by HUD regulations. We also had a seperate sample of 16 failed inspection that occurded during the fiscal year. Out of the sample 2 inspections that had intially failed lacked documentation of a follow up for the failed inspection. Cause Controls over compliance associated with the Authority?s grants of federal funds are inadequate. Effect The Authority is non-compliant with the federal regulations over this federal program, this could potentially result in significant operating and financial penalties. Recommendations We suggest the Authority structure a system capable of properly overseeing compliance with regulations relative to these grants as well as maintaining more accurate and complete documentation of adherence to compliance. Management Views Management agrees with the finding.
Program Name Section 8 Housing Choice Vouchers Significant Deficiency CFDA Number 14.871 N - Special Test 2022-001 Housing Quality Inspection Criteria The PHA must inspect the unit leased to a family at least bi-annually to determine if the unit meets Housing Quality Standards (HQS) and the PHA must conduct quality control re-inspections. The PHA must prepare a unit inspection report (24 CFR ??982.405, 983.103)). Additionally, for units under HAP contract that fail to meet HQS, the PHA must require the owner to correct any life threatening HQS deficiencies within 24 hours after the inspections and all other HQS deficiencies within 30 calendar days or within a specified PHA-approved extension. If the owner does not correct the cited HQS deficiencies within the specified correction period, the PHA must stop (abate) HAPs beginning no later than the first of the month following the specified correction period or must terminate the HAP contract. The owner is not responsible for a breach of HQS as a result of the family?s failure to pay for utilities for which the family is responsible under the lease or for tenant damage. For family-caused defects, if the family does not correct the cited HQS deficiencies within the specified correction period, the PHA must take prompt and vigorous action to enforce the family obligations (24 CFR sections 982.158(d) and 982.404). Condition During our audit, we noted errors in files the did not receive or was not documented that a follow up inspection was performed for a failed inspeaction. We also noted that tenant files were not inspected (or documenation of inspection) with in the bi-annual time frame. Context We selected a sample of 40 inspections that occurred during the fiscal year. Out of the sample 8 tenant files did not complete the required bi-annual inspection that was required by HUD regulations. We also had a seperate sample of 16 failed inspection that occurded during the fiscal year. Out of the sample 2 inspections that had intially failed lacked documentation of a follow up for the failed inspection. Cause Controls over compliance associated with the Authority?s grants of federal funds are inadequate. Effect The Authority is non-compliant with the federal regulations over this federal program, this could potentially result in significant operating and financial penalties. Recommendations We suggest the Authority structure a system capable of properly overseeing compliance with regulations relative to these grants as well as maintaining more accurate and complete documentation of adherence to compliance. Management Views Management agrees with the finding.