Assistance
Listing
Numbers:
Federal Award
Numbers:
Questioned
Costs:
Special Education Cluster
84.027A,
84.027X,
84.173A,
84.173X
H027A220007,
H027X210007,
H173A220003,
H173X210003
None
Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds
21.027
GFRT‐21‐1074 GR‐ARPA‐
100Day‐HIGLEYUSD‐
052022‐119 and GRARPA‐
ASL‐HIGLEY‐145
Federal Agency(ies): Arizona Department of Education, Arizona Governor’s Office
Pass‐Through Agency(ies): N/A
Type of Finding: Noncompliance, Significant Deficiency
Compliance Requirements: Procurement, Suspension and Debarment
Criteria
Non‐federal entities are prohibited from contracting with or making subawards under covered
transactions to parties that are suspended or debarred. “Covered transactions” include contracts for
goods and services awarded under a non‐procurement transaction that are expected to equal or
exceed $25,000 or meet certain other criteria as specified in 2 CFR §180.220. All non‐procurement
transactions entered into by a pass‐through entity (i.e., subawards to subrecipients), irrespective of
award amount, are considered covered transactions, unless they are exempt as provided in 2 CFR
§180.215.
Condition
The District did not initially meet the requirement to verify that covered transactions were only made
to an entity that was not suspended or debarred or otherwise excluded.
Cause
The District only performed procedures to verify vendors were not suspended or debarred for
contracts that were in excess of $100,000.
Effect
The District was not in compliance with federal guidelines. Context
For one Special Education Cluster purchase and four Coronavirus State and Local Recovery Fund
purchases reviewed, the District did not maintain documentation that a suspension and debarment
verification check was completed for purchases in excess of $25,000 but less than $100,000. Upon
audit inquiry, a subsequent verification check was performed, and it was determined that the vendors
were ultimately not suspended or debarred. The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a
statistically valid sample.
Recommendation
The District should update procurement policies to align with federal rules to verify vendors are not
suspended or debarred. In addition, we recommend resources be allocated to train employees to
ensure compliance with federal requirements regarding procurement.
Views of Responsible Officials
See Corrective Action Plan.
Assistance
Listing
Numbers:
Federal Award
Numbers:
Questioned
Costs:
Special Education Cluster
84.027A,
84.027X,
84.173A,
84.173X
H027A220007,
H027X210007,
H173A220003,
H173X210003
None
Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds
21.027
GFRT‐21‐1074 GR‐ARPA‐
100Day‐HIGLEYUSD‐
052022‐119 and GRARPA‐
ASL‐HIGLEY‐145
Federal Agency(ies): Arizona Department of Education, Arizona Governor’s Office
Pass‐Through Agency(ies): N/A
Type of Finding: Noncompliance, Significant Deficiency
Compliance Requirements: Procurement, Suspension and Debarment
Criteria
Non‐federal entities are prohibited from contracting with or making subawards under covered
transactions to parties that are suspended or debarred. “Covered transactions” include contracts for
goods and services awarded under a non‐procurement transaction that are expected to equal or
exceed $25,000 or meet certain other criteria as specified in 2 CFR §180.220. All non‐procurement
transactions entered into by a pass‐through entity (i.e., subawards to subrecipients), irrespective of
award amount, are considered covered transactions, unless they are exempt as provided in 2 CFR
§180.215.
Condition
The District did not initially meet the requirement to verify that covered transactions were only made
to an entity that was not suspended or debarred or otherwise excluded.
Cause
The District only performed procedures to verify vendors were not suspended or debarred for
contracts that were in excess of $100,000.
Effect
The District was not in compliance with federal guidelines. Context
For one Special Education Cluster purchase and four Coronavirus State and Local Recovery Fund
purchases reviewed, the District did not maintain documentation that a suspension and debarment
verification check was completed for purchases in excess of $25,000 but less than $100,000. Upon
audit inquiry, a subsequent verification check was performed, and it was determined that the vendors
were ultimately not suspended or debarred. The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a
statistically valid sample.
Recommendation
The District should update procurement policies to align with federal rules to verify vendors are not
suspended or debarred. In addition, we recommend resources be allocated to train employees to
ensure compliance with federal requirements regarding procurement.
Views of Responsible Officials
See Corrective Action Plan.
Assistance
Listing
Numbers:
Federal Award
Numbers:
Questioned
Costs:
Special Education Cluster
84.027A,
84.027X,
84.173A,
84.173X
H027A220007,
H027X210007,
H173A220003,
H173X210003
None
Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds
21.027
GFRT‐21‐1074 GR‐ARPA‐
100Day‐HIGLEYUSD‐
052022‐119 and GRARPA‐
ASL‐HIGLEY‐145
Federal Agency(ies): Arizona Department of Education, Arizona Governor’s Office
Pass‐Through Agency(ies): N/A
Type of Finding: Noncompliance, Significant Deficiency
Compliance Requirements: Procurement, Suspension and Debarment
Criteria
Non‐federal entities are prohibited from contracting with or making subawards under covered
transactions to parties that are suspended or debarred. “Covered transactions” include contracts for
goods and services awarded under a non‐procurement transaction that are expected to equal or
exceed $25,000 or meet certain other criteria as specified in 2 CFR §180.220. All non‐procurement
transactions entered into by a pass‐through entity (i.e., subawards to subrecipients), irrespective of
award amount, are considered covered transactions, unless they are exempt as provided in 2 CFR
§180.215.
Condition
The District did not initially meet the requirement to verify that covered transactions were only made
to an entity that was not suspended or debarred or otherwise excluded.
Cause
The District only performed procedures to verify vendors were not suspended or debarred for
contracts that were in excess of $100,000.
Effect
The District was not in compliance with federal guidelines. Context
For one Special Education Cluster purchase and four Coronavirus State and Local Recovery Fund
purchases reviewed, the District did not maintain documentation that a suspension and debarment
verification check was completed for purchases in excess of $25,000 but less than $100,000. Upon
audit inquiry, a subsequent verification check was performed, and it was determined that the vendors
were ultimately not suspended or debarred. The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a
statistically valid sample.
Recommendation
The District should update procurement policies to align with federal rules to verify vendors are not
suspended or debarred. In addition, we recommend resources be allocated to train employees to
ensure compliance with federal requirements regarding procurement.
Views of Responsible Officials
See Corrective Action Plan.
Assistance
Listing
Numbers:
Federal Award
Numbers:
Questioned
Costs:
Special Education Cluster
84.027A,
84.027X,
84.173A,
84.173X
H027A220007,
H027X210007,
H173A220003,
H173X210003
None
Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds
21.027
GFRT‐21‐1074 GR‐ARPA‐
100Day‐HIGLEYUSD‐
052022‐119 and GRARPA‐
ASL‐HIGLEY‐145
Federal Agency(ies): Arizona Department of Education, Arizona Governor’s Office
Pass‐Through Agency(ies): N/A
Type of Finding: Noncompliance, Significant Deficiency
Compliance Requirements: Procurement, Suspension and Debarment
Criteria
Non‐federal entities are prohibited from contracting with or making subawards under covered
transactions to parties that are suspended or debarred. “Covered transactions” include contracts for
goods and services awarded under a non‐procurement transaction that are expected to equal or
exceed $25,000 or meet certain other criteria as specified in 2 CFR §180.220. All non‐procurement
transactions entered into by a pass‐through entity (i.e., subawards to subrecipients), irrespective of
award amount, are considered covered transactions, unless they are exempt as provided in 2 CFR
§180.215.
Condition
The District did not initially meet the requirement to verify that covered transactions were only made
to an entity that was not suspended or debarred or otherwise excluded.
Cause
The District only performed procedures to verify vendors were not suspended or debarred for
contracts that were in excess of $100,000.
Effect
The District was not in compliance with federal guidelines. Context
For one Special Education Cluster purchase and four Coronavirus State and Local Recovery Fund
purchases reviewed, the District did not maintain documentation that a suspension and debarment
verification check was completed for purchases in excess of $25,000 but less than $100,000. Upon
audit inquiry, a subsequent verification check was performed, and it was determined that the vendors
were ultimately not suspended or debarred. The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a
statistically valid sample.
Recommendation
The District should update procurement policies to align with federal rules to verify vendors are not
suspended or debarred. In addition, we recommend resources be allocated to train employees to
ensure compliance with federal requirements regarding procurement.
Views of Responsible Officials
See Corrective Action Plan.
Assistance
Listing
Numbers:
Federal Award
Numbers:
Questioned
Costs:
Special Education Cluster
84.027A,
84.027X,
84.173A,
84.173X
H027A220007,
H027X210007,
H173A220003,
H173X210003
None
Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds
21.027
GFRT‐21‐1074 GR‐ARPA‐
100Day‐HIGLEYUSD‐
052022‐119 and GRARPA‐
ASL‐HIGLEY‐145
Federal Agency(ies): Arizona Department of Education, Arizona Governor’s Office
Pass‐Through Agency(ies): N/A
Type of Finding: Noncompliance, Significant Deficiency
Compliance Requirements: Procurement, Suspension and Debarment
Criteria
Non‐federal entities are prohibited from contracting with or making subawards under covered
transactions to parties that are suspended or debarred. “Covered transactions” include contracts for
goods and services awarded under a non‐procurement transaction that are expected to equal or
exceed $25,000 or meet certain other criteria as specified in 2 CFR §180.220. All non‐procurement
transactions entered into by a pass‐through entity (i.e., subawards to subrecipients), irrespective of
award amount, are considered covered transactions, unless they are exempt as provided in 2 CFR
§180.215.
Condition
The District did not initially meet the requirement to verify that covered transactions were only made
to an entity that was not suspended or debarred or otherwise excluded.
Cause
The District only performed procedures to verify vendors were not suspended or debarred for
contracts that were in excess of $100,000.
Effect
The District was not in compliance with federal guidelines. Context
For one Special Education Cluster purchase and four Coronavirus State and Local Recovery Fund
purchases reviewed, the District did not maintain documentation that a suspension and debarment
verification check was completed for purchases in excess of $25,000 but less than $100,000. Upon
audit inquiry, a subsequent verification check was performed, and it was determined that the vendors
were ultimately not suspended or debarred. The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a
statistically valid sample.
Recommendation
The District should update procurement policies to align with federal rules to verify vendors are not
suspended or debarred. In addition, we recommend resources be allocated to train employees to
ensure compliance with federal requirements regarding procurement.
Views of Responsible Officials
See Corrective Action Plan.
Assistance
Listing
Numbers:
Federal Award
Numbers:
Questioned
Costs:
Special Education Cluster
84.027A,
84.027X,
84.173A,
84.173X
H027A220007,
H027X210007,
H173A220003,
H173X210003
None
Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds
21.027
GFRT‐21‐1074 GR‐ARPA‐
100Day‐HIGLEYUSD‐
052022‐119 and GRARPA‐
ASL‐HIGLEY‐145
Federal Agency(ies): Arizona Department of Education, Arizona Governor’s Office
Pass‐Through Agency(ies): N/A
Type of Finding: Noncompliance, Significant Deficiency
Compliance Requirements: Procurement, Suspension and Debarment
Criteria
Non‐federal entities are prohibited from contracting with or making subawards under covered
transactions to parties that are suspended or debarred. “Covered transactions” include contracts for
goods and services awarded under a non‐procurement transaction that are expected to equal or
exceed $25,000 or meet certain other criteria as specified in 2 CFR §180.220. All non‐procurement
transactions entered into by a pass‐through entity (i.e., subawards to subrecipients), irrespective of
award amount, are considered covered transactions, unless they are exempt as provided in 2 CFR
§180.215.
Condition
The District did not initially meet the requirement to verify that covered transactions were only made
to an entity that was not suspended or debarred or otherwise excluded.
Cause
The District only performed procedures to verify vendors were not suspended or debarred for
contracts that were in excess of $100,000.
Effect
The District was not in compliance with federal guidelines. Context
For one Special Education Cluster purchase and four Coronavirus State and Local Recovery Fund
purchases reviewed, the District did not maintain documentation that a suspension and debarment
verification check was completed for purchases in excess of $25,000 but less than $100,000. Upon
audit inquiry, a subsequent verification check was performed, and it was determined that the vendors
were ultimately not suspended or debarred. The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a
statistically valid sample.
Recommendation
The District should update procurement policies to align with federal rules to verify vendors are not
suspended or debarred. In addition, we recommend resources be allocated to train employees to
ensure compliance with federal requirements regarding procurement.
Views of Responsible Officials
See Corrective Action Plan.
Assistance
Listing
Numbers:
Federal Award
Numbers:
Questioned
Costs:
Special Education Cluster
84.027A,
84.027X,
84.173A,
84.173X
H027A220007,
H027X210007,
H173A220003,
H173X210003
None
Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds
21.027
GFRT‐21‐1074 GR‐ARPA‐
100Day‐HIGLEYUSD‐
052022‐119 and GRARPA‐
ASL‐HIGLEY‐145
Federal Agency(ies): Arizona Department of Education, Arizona Governor’s Office
Pass‐Through Agency(ies): N/A
Type of Finding: Noncompliance, Significant Deficiency
Compliance Requirements: Procurement, Suspension and Debarment
Criteria
Non‐federal entities are prohibited from contracting with or making subawards under covered
transactions to parties that are suspended or debarred. “Covered transactions” include contracts for
goods and services awarded under a non‐procurement transaction that are expected to equal or
exceed $25,000 or meet certain other criteria as specified in 2 CFR §180.220. All non‐procurement
transactions entered into by a pass‐through entity (i.e., subawards to subrecipients), irrespective of
award amount, are considered covered transactions, unless they are exempt as provided in 2 CFR
§180.215.
Condition
The District did not initially meet the requirement to verify that covered transactions were only made
to an entity that was not suspended or debarred or otherwise excluded.
Cause
The District only performed procedures to verify vendors were not suspended or debarred for
contracts that were in excess of $100,000.
Effect
The District was not in compliance with federal guidelines. Context
For one Special Education Cluster purchase and four Coronavirus State and Local Recovery Fund
purchases reviewed, the District did not maintain documentation that a suspension and debarment
verification check was completed for purchases in excess of $25,000 but less than $100,000. Upon
audit inquiry, a subsequent verification check was performed, and it was determined that the vendors
were ultimately not suspended or debarred. The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a
statistically valid sample.
Recommendation
The District should update procurement policies to align with federal rules to verify vendors are not
suspended or debarred. In addition, we recommend resources be allocated to train employees to
ensure compliance with federal requirements regarding procurement.
Views of Responsible Officials
See Corrective Action Plan.
Finding Number: 2023‐002
Repeat Finding: No
Program Name/Assistance Listing Title: Education Stabilization Fund
Assistance Listing Number: 84.425D, 84.425U, 84.425W
Federal Agency: Arizona Department of Education
Federal Award Number: S425D200038, S425U210038, S425W210003
Pass‐Through Agency: N/A
Questioned Costs: Unknown
Type of Finding: Noncompliance, Significant Deficiency
Compliance Requirement: Special Tests and Provisions
Criteria
All laborers and mechanics employed by contractors or subcontractors to work on construction
contracts in excess of $2,000 financed by federal assistance funds must be paid wages not less than
those established for the locality of the project (prevailing wage rates) by the Department of Labor
(DOL) (40 USC §§ 3141‐3144, 3146, and 3147).
Condition
It could not be determined whether laborers and mechanics employed by contractors or
subcontractors to work on construction contracts in excess of $2,000 financed by federal assistance
funds were paid equal to or in excess of the prevailing wage rate for the locality.
Cause
The expenditures were originally not spent with Federal dollars but were later moved to a federal
funding source via adjusting journal entry. As a result, the District did not inform the
contractor/subcontractor of the wage rate requirements. Moreover, the District completed the ADE
certifications indicating they would comply with Davis Bacon; however, they did not follow through.
Effect
The District did not comply with the special tests and provisions requirement of the grant.
Context
For one of two vendors where wage rate requirements were applicable, the District did not notify
contractors and subcontractors of the requirements to comply with the wage rate requirements and
did not obtain copies of certified payrolls for construction projects funded with grant monies. The
sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample.
Recommendation
The District should review Federal requirements over Davis Bacon, develop policies and procedures,
and ensure those developed policies and procedures are implemented. Views of Responsible Officials
See Corrective Action Plan.
Finding Number: 2023‐002
Repeat Finding: No
Program Name/Assistance Listing Title: Education Stabilization Fund
Assistance Listing Number: 84.425D, 84.425U, 84.425W
Federal Agency: Arizona Department of Education
Federal Award Number: S425D200038, S425U210038, S425W210003
Pass‐Through Agency: N/A
Questioned Costs: Unknown
Type of Finding: Noncompliance, Significant Deficiency
Compliance Requirement: Special Tests and Provisions
Criteria
All laborers and mechanics employed by contractors or subcontractors to work on construction
contracts in excess of $2,000 financed by federal assistance funds must be paid wages not less than
those established for the locality of the project (prevailing wage rates) by the Department of Labor
(DOL) (40 USC §§ 3141‐3144, 3146, and 3147).
Condition
It could not be determined whether laborers and mechanics employed by contractors or
subcontractors to work on construction contracts in excess of $2,000 financed by federal assistance
funds were paid equal to or in excess of the prevailing wage rate for the locality.
Cause
The expenditures were originally not spent with Federal dollars but were later moved to a federal
funding source via adjusting journal entry. As a result, the District did not inform the
contractor/subcontractor of the wage rate requirements. Moreover, the District completed the ADE
certifications indicating they would comply with Davis Bacon; however, they did not follow through.
Effect
The District did not comply with the special tests and provisions requirement of the grant.
Context
For one of two vendors where wage rate requirements were applicable, the District did not notify
contractors and subcontractors of the requirements to comply with the wage rate requirements and
did not obtain copies of certified payrolls for construction projects funded with grant monies. The
sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample.
Recommendation
The District should review Federal requirements over Davis Bacon, develop policies and procedures,
and ensure those developed policies and procedures are implemented. Views of Responsible Officials
See Corrective Action Plan.
Assistance
Listing
Numbers:
Federal Award
Numbers:
Questioned
Costs:
Special Education Cluster
84.027A,
84.027X,
84.173A,
84.173X
H027A220007,
H027X210007,
H173A220003,
H173X210003
None
Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds
21.027
GFRT‐21‐1074 GR‐ARPA‐
100Day‐HIGLEYUSD‐
052022‐119 and GRARPA‐
ASL‐HIGLEY‐145
Federal Agency(ies): Arizona Department of Education, Arizona Governor’s Office
Pass‐Through Agency(ies): N/A
Type of Finding: Noncompliance, Significant Deficiency
Compliance Requirements: Procurement, Suspension and Debarment
Criteria
Non‐federal entities are prohibited from contracting with or making subawards under covered
transactions to parties that are suspended or debarred. “Covered transactions” include contracts for
goods and services awarded under a non‐procurement transaction that are expected to equal or
exceed $25,000 or meet certain other criteria as specified in 2 CFR §180.220. All non‐procurement
transactions entered into by a pass‐through entity (i.e., subawards to subrecipients), irrespective of
award amount, are considered covered transactions, unless they are exempt as provided in 2 CFR
§180.215.
Condition
The District did not initially meet the requirement to verify that covered transactions were only made
to an entity that was not suspended or debarred or otherwise excluded.
Cause
The District only performed procedures to verify vendors were not suspended or debarred for
contracts that were in excess of $100,000.
Effect
The District was not in compliance with federal guidelines. Context
For one Special Education Cluster purchase and four Coronavirus State and Local Recovery Fund
purchases reviewed, the District did not maintain documentation that a suspension and debarment
verification check was completed for purchases in excess of $25,000 but less than $100,000. Upon
audit inquiry, a subsequent verification check was performed, and it was determined that the vendors
were ultimately not suspended or debarred. The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a
statistically valid sample.
Recommendation
The District should update procurement policies to align with federal rules to verify vendors are not
suspended or debarred. In addition, we recommend resources be allocated to train employees to
ensure compliance with federal requirements regarding procurement.
Views of Responsible Officials
See Corrective Action Plan.
Assistance
Listing
Numbers:
Federal Award
Numbers:
Questioned
Costs:
Special Education Cluster
84.027A,
84.027X,
84.173A,
84.173X
H027A220007,
H027X210007,
H173A220003,
H173X210003
None
Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds
21.027
GFRT‐21‐1074 GR‐ARPA‐
100Day‐HIGLEYUSD‐
052022‐119 and GRARPA‐
ASL‐HIGLEY‐145
Federal Agency(ies): Arizona Department of Education, Arizona Governor’s Office
Pass‐Through Agency(ies): N/A
Type of Finding: Noncompliance, Significant Deficiency
Compliance Requirements: Procurement, Suspension and Debarment
Criteria
Non‐federal entities are prohibited from contracting with or making subawards under covered
transactions to parties that are suspended or debarred. “Covered transactions” include contracts for
goods and services awarded under a non‐procurement transaction that are expected to equal or
exceed $25,000 or meet certain other criteria as specified in 2 CFR §180.220. All non‐procurement
transactions entered into by a pass‐through entity (i.e., subawards to subrecipients), irrespective of
award amount, are considered covered transactions, unless they are exempt as provided in 2 CFR
§180.215.
Condition
The District did not initially meet the requirement to verify that covered transactions were only made
to an entity that was not suspended or debarred or otherwise excluded.
Cause
The District only performed procedures to verify vendors were not suspended or debarred for
contracts that were in excess of $100,000.
Effect
The District was not in compliance with federal guidelines. Context
For one Special Education Cluster purchase and four Coronavirus State and Local Recovery Fund
purchases reviewed, the District did not maintain documentation that a suspension and debarment
verification check was completed for purchases in excess of $25,000 but less than $100,000. Upon
audit inquiry, a subsequent verification check was performed, and it was determined that the vendors
were ultimately not suspended or debarred. The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a
statistically valid sample.
Recommendation
The District should update procurement policies to align with federal rules to verify vendors are not
suspended or debarred. In addition, we recommend resources be allocated to train employees to
ensure compliance with federal requirements regarding procurement.
Views of Responsible Officials
See Corrective Action Plan.
Assistance
Listing
Numbers:
Federal Award
Numbers:
Questioned
Costs:
Special Education Cluster
84.027A,
84.027X,
84.173A,
84.173X
H027A220007,
H027X210007,
H173A220003,
H173X210003
None
Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds
21.027
GFRT‐21‐1074 GR‐ARPA‐
100Day‐HIGLEYUSD‐
052022‐119 and GRARPA‐
ASL‐HIGLEY‐145
Federal Agency(ies): Arizona Department of Education, Arizona Governor’s Office
Pass‐Through Agency(ies): N/A
Type of Finding: Noncompliance, Significant Deficiency
Compliance Requirements: Procurement, Suspension and Debarment
Criteria
Non‐federal entities are prohibited from contracting with or making subawards under covered
transactions to parties that are suspended or debarred. “Covered transactions” include contracts for
goods and services awarded under a non‐procurement transaction that are expected to equal or
exceed $25,000 or meet certain other criteria as specified in 2 CFR §180.220. All non‐procurement
transactions entered into by a pass‐through entity (i.e., subawards to subrecipients), irrespective of
award amount, are considered covered transactions, unless they are exempt as provided in 2 CFR
§180.215.
Condition
The District did not initially meet the requirement to verify that covered transactions were only made
to an entity that was not suspended or debarred or otherwise excluded.
Cause
The District only performed procedures to verify vendors were not suspended or debarred for
contracts that were in excess of $100,000.
Effect
The District was not in compliance with federal guidelines. Context
For one Special Education Cluster purchase and four Coronavirus State and Local Recovery Fund
purchases reviewed, the District did not maintain documentation that a suspension and debarment
verification check was completed for purchases in excess of $25,000 but less than $100,000. Upon
audit inquiry, a subsequent verification check was performed, and it was determined that the vendors
were ultimately not suspended or debarred. The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a
statistically valid sample.
Recommendation
The District should update procurement policies to align with federal rules to verify vendors are not
suspended or debarred. In addition, we recommend resources be allocated to train employees to
ensure compliance with federal requirements regarding procurement.
Views of Responsible Officials
See Corrective Action Plan.
Assistance
Listing
Numbers:
Federal Award
Numbers:
Questioned
Costs:
Special Education Cluster
84.027A,
84.027X,
84.173A,
84.173X
H027A220007,
H027X210007,
H173A220003,
H173X210003
None
Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds
21.027
GFRT‐21‐1074 GR‐ARPA‐
100Day‐HIGLEYUSD‐
052022‐119 and GRARPA‐
ASL‐HIGLEY‐145
Federal Agency(ies): Arizona Department of Education, Arizona Governor’s Office
Pass‐Through Agency(ies): N/A
Type of Finding: Noncompliance, Significant Deficiency
Compliance Requirements: Procurement, Suspension and Debarment
Criteria
Non‐federal entities are prohibited from contracting with or making subawards under covered
transactions to parties that are suspended or debarred. “Covered transactions” include contracts for
goods and services awarded under a non‐procurement transaction that are expected to equal or
exceed $25,000 or meet certain other criteria as specified in 2 CFR §180.220. All non‐procurement
transactions entered into by a pass‐through entity (i.e., subawards to subrecipients), irrespective of
award amount, are considered covered transactions, unless they are exempt as provided in 2 CFR
§180.215.
Condition
The District did not initially meet the requirement to verify that covered transactions were only made
to an entity that was not suspended or debarred or otherwise excluded.
Cause
The District only performed procedures to verify vendors were not suspended or debarred for
contracts that were in excess of $100,000.
Effect
The District was not in compliance with federal guidelines. Context
For one Special Education Cluster purchase and four Coronavirus State and Local Recovery Fund
purchases reviewed, the District did not maintain documentation that a suspension and debarment
verification check was completed for purchases in excess of $25,000 but less than $100,000. Upon
audit inquiry, a subsequent verification check was performed, and it was determined that the vendors
were ultimately not suspended or debarred. The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a
statistically valid sample.
Recommendation
The District should update procurement policies to align with federal rules to verify vendors are not
suspended or debarred. In addition, we recommend resources be allocated to train employees to
ensure compliance with federal requirements regarding procurement.
Views of Responsible Officials
See Corrective Action Plan.
Assistance
Listing
Numbers:
Federal Award
Numbers:
Questioned
Costs:
Special Education Cluster
84.027A,
84.027X,
84.173A,
84.173X
H027A220007,
H027X210007,
H173A220003,
H173X210003
None
Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds
21.027
GFRT‐21‐1074 GR‐ARPA‐
100Day‐HIGLEYUSD‐
052022‐119 and GRARPA‐
ASL‐HIGLEY‐145
Federal Agency(ies): Arizona Department of Education, Arizona Governor’s Office
Pass‐Through Agency(ies): N/A
Type of Finding: Noncompliance, Significant Deficiency
Compliance Requirements: Procurement, Suspension and Debarment
Criteria
Non‐federal entities are prohibited from contracting with or making subawards under covered
transactions to parties that are suspended or debarred. “Covered transactions” include contracts for
goods and services awarded under a non‐procurement transaction that are expected to equal or
exceed $25,000 or meet certain other criteria as specified in 2 CFR §180.220. All non‐procurement
transactions entered into by a pass‐through entity (i.e., subawards to subrecipients), irrespective of
award amount, are considered covered transactions, unless they are exempt as provided in 2 CFR
§180.215.
Condition
The District did not initially meet the requirement to verify that covered transactions were only made
to an entity that was not suspended or debarred or otherwise excluded.
Cause
The District only performed procedures to verify vendors were not suspended or debarred for
contracts that were in excess of $100,000.
Effect
The District was not in compliance with federal guidelines. Context
For one Special Education Cluster purchase and four Coronavirus State and Local Recovery Fund
purchases reviewed, the District did not maintain documentation that a suspension and debarment
verification check was completed for purchases in excess of $25,000 but less than $100,000. Upon
audit inquiry, a subsequent verification check was performed, and it was determined that the vendors
were ultimately not suspended or debarred. The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a
statistically valid sample.
Recommendation
The District should update procurement policies to align with federal rules to verify vendors are not
suspended or debarred. In addition, we recommend resources be allocated to train employees to
ensure compliance with federal requirements regarding procurement.
Views of Responsible Officials
See Corrective Action Plan.
Assistance
Listing
Numbers:
Federal Award
Numbers:
Questioned
Costs:
Special Education Cluster
84.027A,
84.027X,
84.173A,
84.173X
H027A220007,
H027X210007,
H173A220003,
H173X210003
None
Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds
21.027
GFRT‐21‐1074 GR‐ARPA‐
100Day‐HIGLEYUSD‐
052022‐119 and GRARPA‐
ASL‐HIGLEY‐145
Federal Agency(ies): Arizona Department of Education, Arizona Governor’s Office
Pass‐Through Agency(ies): N/A
Type of Finding: Noncompliance, Significant Deficiency
Compliance Requirements: Procurement, Suspension and Debarment
Criteria
Non‐federal entities are prohibited from contracting with or making subawards under covered
transactions to parties that are suspended or debarred. “Covered transactions” include contracts for
goods and services awarded under a non‐procurement transaction that are expected to equal or
exceed $25,000 or meet certain other criteria as specified in 2 CFR §180.220. All non‐procurement
transactions entered into by a pass‐through entity (i.e., subawards to subrecipients), irrespective of
award amount, are considered covered transactions, unless they are exempt as provided in 2 CFR
§180.215.
Condition
The District did not initially meet the requirement to verify that covered transactions were only made
to an entity that was not suspended or debarred or otherwise excluded.
Cause
The District only performed procedures to verify vendors were not suspended or debarred for
contracts that were in excess of $100,000.
Effect
The District was not in compliance with federal guidelines. Context
For one Special Education Cluster purchase and four Coronavirus State and Local Recovery Fund
purchases reviewed, the District did not maintain documentation that a suspension and debarment
verification check was completed for purchases in excess of $25,000 but less than $100,000. Upon
audit inquiry, a subsequent verification check was performed, and it was determined that the vendors
were ultimately not suspended or debarred. The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a
statistically valid sample.
Recommendation
The District should update procurement policies to align with federal rules to verify vendors are not
suspended or debarred. In addition, we recommend resources be allocated to train employees to
ensure compliance with federal requirements regarding procurement.
Views of Responsible Officials
See Corrective Action Plan.
Assistance
Listing
Numbers:
Federal Award
Numbers:
Questioned
Costs:
Special Education Cluster
84.027A,
84.027X,
84.173A,
84.173X
H027A220007,
H027X210007,
H173A220003,
H173X210003
None
Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds
21.027
GFRT‐21‐1074 GR‐ARPA‐
100Day‐HIGLEYUSD‐
052022‐119 and GRARPA‐
ASL‐HIGLEY‐145
Federal Agency(ies): Arizona Department of Education, Arizona Governor’s Office
Pass‐Through Agency(ies): N/A
Type of Finding: Noncompliance, Significant Deficiency
Compliance Requirements: Procurement, Suspension and Debarment
Criteria
Non‐federal entities are prohibited from contracting with or making subawards under covered
transactions to parties that are suspended or debarred. “Covered transactions” include contracts for
goods and services awarded under a non‐procurement transaction that are expected to equal or
exceed $25,000 or meet certain other criteria as specified in 2 CFR §180.220. All non‐procurement
transactions entered into by a pass‐through entity (i.e., subawards to subrecipients), irrespective of
award amount, are considered covered transactions, unless they are exempt as provided in 2 CFR
§180.215.
Condition
The District did not initially meet the requirement to verify that covered transactions were only made
to an entity that was not suspended or debarred or otherwise excluded.
Cause
The District only performed procedures to verify vendors were not suspended or debarred for
contracts that were in excess of $100,000.
Effect
The District was not in compliance with federal guidelines. Context
For one Special Education Cluster purchase and four Coronavirus State and Local Recovery Fund
purchases reviewed, the District did not maintain documentation that a suspension and debarment
verification check was completed for purchases in excess of $25,000 but less than $100,000. Upon
audit inquiry, a subsequent verification check was performed, and it was determined that the vendors
were ultimately not suspended or debarred. The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a
statistically valid sample.
Recommendation
The District should update procurement policies to align with federal rules to verify vendors are not
suspended or debarred. In addition, we recommend resources be allocated to train employees to
ensure compliance with federal requirements regarding procurement.
Views of Responsible Officials
See Corrective Action Plan.
Finding Number: 2023‐002
Repeat Finding: No
Program Name/Assistance Listing Title: Education Stabilization Fund
Assistance Listing Number: 84.425D, 84.425U, 84.425W
Federal Agency: Arizona Department of Education
Federal Award Number: S425D200038, S425U210038, S425W210003
Pass‐Through Agency: N/A
Questioned Costs: Unknown
Type of Finding: Noncompliance, Significant Deficiency
Compliance Requirement: Special Tests and Provisions
Criteria
All laborers and mechanics employed by contractors or subcontractors to work on construction
contracts in excess of $2,000 financed by federal assistance funds must be paid wages not less than
those established for the locality of the project (prevailing wage rates) by the Department of Labor
(DOL) (40 USC §§ 3141‐3144, 3146, and 3147).
Condition
It could not be determined whether laborers and mechanics employed by contractors or
subcontractors to work on construction contracts in excess of $2,000 financed by federal assistance
funds were paid equal to or in excess of the prevailing wage rate for the locality.
Cause
The expenditures were originally not spent with Federal dollars but were later moved to a federal
funding source via adjusting journal entry. As a result, the District did not inform the
contractor/subcontractor of the wage rate requirements. Moreover, the District completed the ADE
certifications indicating they would comply with Davis Bacon; however, they did not follow through.
Effect
The District did not comply with the special tests and provisions requirement of the grant.
Context
For one of two vendors where wage rate requirements were applicable, the District did not notify
contractors and subcontractors of the requirements to comply with the wage rate requirements and
did not obtain copies of certified payrolls for construction projects funded with grant monies. The
sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample.
Recommendation
The District should review Federal requirements over Davis Bacon, develop policies and procedures,
and ensure those developed policies and procedures are implemented. Views of Responsible Officials
See Corrective Action Plan.
Finding Number: 2023‐002
Repeat Finding: No
Program Name/Assistance Listing Title: Education Stabilization Fund
Assistance Listing Number: 84.425D, 84.425U, 84.425W
Federal Agency: Arizona Department of Education
Federal Award Number: S425D200038, S425U210038, S425W210003
Pass‐Through Agency: N/A
Questioned Costs: Unknown
Type of Finding: Noncompliance, Significant Deficiency
Compliance Requirement: Special Tests and Provisions
Criteria
All laborers and mechanics employed by contractors or subcontractors to work on construction
contracts in excess of $2,000 financed by federal assistance funds must be paid wages not less than
those established for the locality of the project (prevailing wage rates) by the Department of Labor
(DOL) (40 USC §§ 3141‐3144, 3146, and 3147).
Condition
It could not be determined whether laborers and mechanics employed by contractors or
subcontractors to work on construction contracts in excess of $2,000 financed by federal assistance
funds were paid equal to or in excess of the prevailing wage rate for the locality.
Cause
The expenditures were originally not spent with Federal dollars but were later moved to a federal
funding source via adjusting journal entry. As a result, the District did not inform the
contractor/subcontractor of the wage rate requirements. Moreover, the District completed the ADE
certifications indicating they would comply with Davis Bacon; however, they did not follow through.
Effect
The District did not comply with the special tests and provisions requirement of the grant.
Context
For one of two vendors where wage rate requirements were applicable, the District did not notify
contractors and subcontractors of the requirements to comply with the wage rate requirements and
did not obtain copies of certified payrolls for construction projects funded with grant monies. The
sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample.
Recommendation
The District should review Federal requirements over Davis Bacon, develop policies and procedures,
and ensure those developed policies and procedures are implemented. Views of Responsible Officials
See Corrective Action Plan.