1. FINDING NUMBER: 2023 - 001 2. THIS FINDING IS: New
3. Federal Program Name and Year: Child Nutrition Cluster 4. Project No.: 4210-00, 4210-BT, 4210-SC, 4220-00
5. CFDA No.: 10.555, 10.553
6. Passed Through: Illinois State Board of Education
7. Federal Agency: US Department of Agriculture
8. Criteria or specific requirement (including statutory, regulatory, or other citation)
For the 3% verification of applications, the District should have a determining official complete and sign the verification form and a confirming official review and sign the verification form.
9. Condition: The determining official did not complete the form and did not sign the form for all applications selected.
10. Questioned Costs: N/A
11. Context: 3 verification forms were selected from a population of 3.
12. Effect: The District is not in compliance with the completion of the verification forms.
13. Cause: The District did not correctly complete the verification forms.
14. Recommendation: We recommend the District review its processes and make sure the verification forms are completed correctly.
15. Management's response: Management will review and implement procedures to ensure the verification forms are completed correctly.
1. FINDING NUMBER: 2023 - 001 2. THIS FINDING IS: New
3. Federal Program Name and Year: Child Nutrition Cluster 4. Project No.: 4210-00, 4210-BT, 4210-SC, 4220-00
5. CFDA No.: 10.555, 10.553
6. Passed Through: Illinois State Board of Education
7. Federal Agency: US Department of Agriculture
8. Criteria or specific requirement (including statutory, regulatory, or other citation)
For the 3% verification of applications, the District should have a determining official complete and sign the verification form and a confirming official review and sign the verification form.
9. Condition: The determining official did not complete the form and did not sign the form for all applications selected.
10. Questioned Costs: N/A
11. Context: 3 verification forms were selected from a population of 3.
12. Effect: The District is not in compliance with the completion of the verification forms.
13. Cause: The District did not correctly complete the verification forms.
14. Recommendation: We recommend the District review its processes and make sure the verification forms are completed correctly.
15. Management's response: Management will review and implement procedures to ensure the verification forms are completed correctly.
1. FINDING NUMBER: 2023 - 001 2. THIS FINDING IS: New
3. Federal Program Name and Year: Child Nutrition Cluster 4. Project No.: 4210-00, 4210-BT, 4210-SC, 4220-00
5. CFDA No.: 10.555, 10.553
6. Passed Through: Illinois State Board of Education
7. Federal Agency: US Department of Agriculture
8. Criteria or specific requirement (including statutory, regulatory, or other citation)
For the 3% verification of applications, the District should have a determining official complete and sign the verification form and a confirming official review and sign the verification form.
9. Condition: The determining official did not complete the form and did not sign the form for all applications selected.
10. Questioned Costs: N/A
11. Context: 3 verification forms were selected from a population of 3.
12. Effect: The District is not in compliance with the completion of the verification forms.
13. Cause: The District did not correctly complete the verification forms.
14. Recommendation: We recommend the District review its processes and make sure the verification forms are completed correctly.
15. Management's response: Management will review and implement procedures to ensure the verification forms are completed correctly.
1. FINDING NUMBER: 2023 - 002 2. THIS FINDING IS: New
3. Federal Program Name and Year: Child Nutrition Cluster
4. Project No.: 4210-00, 4210-BT, 4210-SC, 4220-00 5. CFDA No.: 10.555, 10.553
6. Passed Through: Illinois State Board of Education
7. Federal Agency: US Department of Agriculture
8. Criteria or specific requirement (including statutory, regulatory, or other citation): For the 3% verifications of applications, the District is required to select error prone applications for households receiving free or
reduced lunch as determined by October 1st. They then request documentation on the household income to verify the information provided on the application was correct and the determination does not need to be changed. If the documentation determines the original application determination was incorrect, they are to change the student's status of free or reduced.
9. Condition: In a population of 3 error prone applications selected for verification, exceptions were noted on 1 of the applications selected for verification. The 1 verification documentation received determined the student should be changed from reduced lunch to paid lunch and this change was not made.
10. Questioned Costs: N/A
11. Context: 3 verification forms were selected from a population of 3.
12. Effect: Student received reduced lunch for the year when they should have paid for lunch.
13. Cause: The District did not correctly determine the free, reduce, or paid status based on documentation received for the verification process.
14. Recommendation: The District should implement procedures to ensure a student's free or reduced lunch status is properly updated during the application verification process.
15. Management's response: Management will review and implement procedures to ensure the free or reduced lunch status is properly updated during the application verification process.
1. FINDING NUMBER: 2023 - 002 2. THIS FINDING IS: New
3. Federal Program Name and Year: Child Nutrition Cluster
4. Project No.: 4210-00, 4210-BT, 4210-SC, 4220-00 5. CFDA No.: 10.555, 10.553
6. Passed Through: Illinois State Board of Education
7. Federal Agency: US Department of Agriculture
8. Criteria or specific requirement (including statutory, regulatory, or other citation): For the 3% verifications of applications, the District is required to select error prone applications for households receiving free or
reduced lunch as determined by October 1st. They then request documentation on the household income to verify the information provided on the application was correct and the determination does not need to be changed. If the documentation determines the original application determination was incorrect, they are to change the student's status of free or reduced.
9. Condition: In a population of 3 error prone applications selected for verification, exceptions were noted on 1 of the applications selected for verification. The 1 verification documentation received determined the student should be changed from reduced lunch to paid lunch and this change was not made.
10. Questioned Costs: N/A
11. Context: 3 verification forms were selected from a population of 3.
12. Effect: Student received reduced lunch for the year when they should have paid for lunch.
13. Cause: The District did not correctly determine the free, reduce, or paid status based on documentation received for the verification process.
14. Recommendation: The District should implement procedures to ensure a student's free or reduced lunch status is properly updated during the application verification process.
15. Management's response: Management will review and implement procedures to ensure the free or reduced lunch status is properly updated during the application verification process.
1. FINDING NUMBER: 2023 - 002 2. THIS FINDING IS: New
3. Federal Program Name and Year: Child Nutrition Cluster
4. Project No.: 4210-00, 4210-BT, 4210-SC, 4220-00 5. CFDA No.: 10.555, 10.553
6. Passed Through: Illinois State Board of Education
7. Federal Agency: US Department of Agriculture
8. Criteria or specific requirement (including statutory, regulatory, or other citation): For the 3% verifications of applications, the District is required to select error prone applications for households receiving free or
reduced lunch as determined by October 1st. They then request documentation on the household income to verify the information provided on the application was correct and the determination does not need to be changed. If the documentation determines the original application determination was incorrect, they are to change the student's status of free or reduced.
9. Condition: In a population of 3 error prone applications selected for verification, exceptions were noted on 1 of the applications selected for verification. The 1 verification documentation received determined the student should be changed from reduced lunch to paid lunch and this change was not made.
10. Questioned Costs: N/A
11. Context: 3 verification forms were selected from a population of 3.
12. Effect: Student received reduced lunch for the year when they should have paid for lunch.
13. Cause: The District did not correctly determine the free, reduce, or paid status based on documentation received for the verification process.
14. Recommendation: The District should implement procedures to ensure a student's free or reduced lunch status is properly updated during the application verification process.
15. Management's response: Management will review and implement procedures to ensure the free or reduced lunch status is properly updated during the application verification process.
1. FINDING NUMBER: 2023 - 003 2. THIS FINDING IS: New
3. Federal Program Name and Year: Special Education Cluster
4. Project No.: 4620-00, 4620-EI, 4625-00, 4998-ID, 4600-00, 4998-PS 5. CFDA No.: 84.027, 84.027X, 84.173, 84.173X
6. Passed Through: Illinois State Board of Education
7. Federal Agency: US Department of Education
8. Criteria or specific requirement (including statutory, regulatory, or other citation: The District is only allowed to submit an expeditire once for the grant to be reimbursed.
9. Condition: In a population of over 550 invoices, exceptions were noted in 1 out of 47 invoices tested. The 1 invoice was paid twice and claimed for reimbursement twice.
10. Questioned Costs: $1,400
11. Context: 47 invoices were selected from a population of over 550
12. Effect: The District was not in compliance with only submitting expenditures for reimbursement once.
13. Cause: The District wrote a check for an invoice that was never received by the vendor and did not clear the bank. They then paid the invoice by credit card and did not void the check. The District submitted both payments as expenditures for reimbursement.
14. Recommendation: We recommend the District review procedures for claiming expenditures to determine expenditures are not claimed multiple times for reimbursement.
15. Management's response: Management will implement procedures to ensure an expenditure has cleared the bank before they are claimed as expenditures and remove the expenditure from the grant if they pay in another manner.
1. FINDING NUMBER: 2023 - 003 2. THIS FINDING IS: New
3. Federal Program Name and Year: Special Education Cluster
4. Project No.: 4620-00, 4620-EI, 4625-00, 4998-ID, 4600-00, 4998-PS 5. CFDA No.: 84.027, 84.027X, 84.173, 84.173X
6. Passed Through: Illinois State Board of Education
7. Federal Agency: US Department of Education
8. Criteria or specific requirement (including statutory, regulatory, or other citation: The District is only allowed to submit an expeditire once for the grant to be reimbursed.
9. Condition: In a population of over 550 invoices, exceptions were noted in 1 out of 47 invoices tested. The 1 invoice was paid twice and claimed for reimbursement twice.
10. Questioned Costs: $1,400
11. Context: 47 invoices were selected from a population of over 550
12. Effect: The District was not in compliance with only submitting expenditures for reimbursement once.
13. Cause: The District wrote a check for an invoice that was never received by the vendor and did not clear the bank. They then paid the invoice by credit card and did not void the check. The District submitted both payments as expenditures for reimbursement.
14. Recommendation: We recommend the District review procedures for claiming expenditures to determine expenditures are not claimed multiple times for reimbursement.
15. Management's response: Management will implement procedures to ensure an expenditure has cleared the bank before they are claimed as expenditures and remove the expenditure from the grant if they pay in another manner.
1. FINDING NUMBER: 2023 - 003 2. THIS FINDING IS: New
3. Federal Program Name and Year: Special Education Cluster
4. Project No.: 4620-00, 4620-EI, 4625-00, 4998-ID, 4600-00, 4998-PS 5. CFDA No.: 84.027, 84.027X, 84.173, 84.173X
6. Passed Through: Illinois State Board of Education
7. Federal Agency: US Department of Education
8. Criteria or specific requirement (including statutory, regulatory, or other citation: The District is only allowed to submit an expeditire once for the grant to be reimbursed.
9. Condition: In a population of over 550 invoices, exceptions were noted in 1 out of 47 invoices tested. The 1 invoice was paid twice and claimed for reimbursement twice.
10. Questioned Costs: $1,400
11. Context: 47 invoices were selected from a population of over 550
12. Effect: The District was not in compliance with only submitting expenditures for reimbursement once.
13. Cause: The District wrote a check for an invoice that was never received by the vendor and did not clear the bank. They then paid the invoice by credit card and did not void the check. The District submitted both payments as expenditures for reimbursement.
14. Recommendation: We recommend the District review procedures for claiming expenditures to determine expenditures are not claimed multiple times for reimbursement.
15. Management's response: Management will implement procedures to ensure an expenditure has cleared the bank before they are claimed as expenditures and remove the expenditure from the grant if they pay in another manner.
1. FINDING NUMBER: 2023 - 003 2. THIS FINDING IS: New
3. Federal Program Name and Year: Special Education Cluster
4. Project No.: 4620-00, 4620-EI, 4625-00, 4998-ID, 4600-00, 4998-PS 5. CFDA No.: 84.027, 84.027X, 84.173, 84.173X
6. Passed Through: Illinois State Board of Education
7. Federal Agency: US Department of Education
8. Criteria or specific requirement (including statutory, regulatory, or other citation: The District is only allowed to submit an expeditire once for the grant to be reimbursed.
9. Condition: In a population of over 550 invoices, exceptions were noted in 1 out of 47 invoices tested. The 1 invoice was paid twice and claimed for reimbursement twice.
10. Questioned Costs: $1,400
11. Context: 47 invoices were selected from a population of over 550
12. Effect: The District was not in compliance with only submitting expenditures for reimbursement once.
13. Cause: The District wrote a check for an invoice that was never received by the vendor and did not clear the bank. They then paid the invoice by credit card and did not void the check. The District submitted both payments as expenditures for reimbursement.
14. Recommendation: We recommend the District review procedures for claiming expenditures to determine expenditures are not claimed multiple times for reimbursement.
15. Management's response: Management will implement procedures to ensure an expenditure has cleared the bank before they are claimed as expenditures and remove the expenditure from the grant if they pay in another manner.
1. FINDING NUMBER: 2023 - 001 2. THIS FINDING IS: New
3. Federal Program Name and Year: Child Nutrition Cluster 4. Project No.: 4210-00, 4210-BT, 4210-SC, 4220-00
5. CFDA No.: 10.555, 10.553
6. Passed Through: Illinois State Board of Education
7. Federal Agency: US Department of Agriculture
8. Criteria or specific requirement (including statutory, regulatory, or other citation)
For the 3% verification of applications, the District should have a determining official complete and sign the verification form and a confirming official review and sign the verification form.
9. Condition: The determining official did not complete the form and did not sign the form for all applications selected.
10. Questioned Costs: N/A
11. Context: 3 verification forms were selected from a population of 3.
12. Effect: The District is not in compliance with the completion of the verification forms.
13. Cause: The District did not correctly complete the verification forms.
14. Recommendation: We recommend the District review its processes and make sure the verification forms are completed correctly.
15. Management's response: Management will review and implement procedures to ensure the verification forms are completed correctly.
1. FINDING NUMBER: 2023 - 001 2. THIS FINDING IS: New
3. Federal Program Name and Year: Child Nutrition Cluster 4. Project No.: 4210-00, 4210-BT, 4210-SC, 4220-00
5. CFDA No.: 10.555, 10.553
6. Passed Through: Illinois State Board of Education
7. Federal Agency: US Department of Agriculture
8. Criteria or specific requirement (including statutory, regulatory, or other citation)
For the 3% verification of applications, the District should have a determining official complete and sign the verification form and a confirming official review and sign the verification form.
9. Condition: The determining official did not complete the form and did not sign the form for all applications selected.
10. Questioned Costs: N/A
11. Context: 3 verification forms were selected from a population of 3.
12. Effect: The District is not in compliance with the completion of the verification forms.
13. Cause: The District did not correctly complete the verification forms.
14. Recommendation: We recommend the District review its processes and make sure the verification forms are completed correctly.
15. Management's response: Management will review and implement procedures to ensure the verification forms are completed correctly.
1. FINDING NUMBER: 2023 - 001 2. THIS FINDING IS: New
3. Federal Program Name and Year: Child Nutrition Cluster 4. Project No.: 4210-00, 4210-BT, 4210-SC, 4220-00
5. CFDA No.: 10.555, 10.553
6. Passed Through: Illinois State Board of Education
7. Federal Agency: US Department of Agriculture
8. Criteria or specific requirement (including statutory, regulatory, or other citation)
For the 3% verification of applications, the District should have a determining official complete and sign the verification form and a confirming official review and sign the verification form.
9. Condition: The determining official did not complete the form and did not sign the form for all applications selected.
10. Questioned Costs: N/A
11. Context: 3 verification forms were selected from a population of 3.
12. Effect: The District is not in compliance with the completion of the verification forms.
13. Cause: The District did not correctly complete the verification forms.
14. Recommendation: We recommend the District review its processes and make sure the verification forms are completed correctly.
15. Management's response: Management will review and implement procedures to ensure the verification forms are completed correctly.
1. FINDING NUMBER: 2023 - 002 2. THIS FINDING IS: New
3. Federal Program Name and Year: Child Nutrition Cluster
4. Project No.: 4210-00, 4210-BT, 4210-SC, 4220-00 5. CFDA No.: 10.555, 10.553
6. Passed Through: Illinois State Board of Education
7. Federal Agency: US Department of Agriculture
8. Criteria or specific requirement (including statutory, regulatory, or other citation): For the 3% verifications of applications, the District is required to select error prone applications for households receiving free or
reduced lunch as determined by October 1st. They then request documentation on the household income to verify the information provided on the application was correct and the determination does not need to be changed. If the documentation determines the original application determination was incorrect, they are to change the student's status of free or reduced.
9. Condition: In a population of 3 error prone applications selected for verification, exceptions were noted on 1 of the applications selected for verification. The 1 verification documentation received determined the student should be changed from reduced lunch to paid lunch and this change was not made.
10. Questioned Costs: N/A
11. Context: 3 verification forms were selected from a population of 3.
12. Effect: Student received reduced lunch for the year when they should have paid for lunch.
13. Cause: The District did not correctly determine the free, reduce, or paid status based on documentation received for the verification process.
14. Recommendation: The District should implement procedures to ensure a student's free or reduced lunch status is properly updated during the application verification process.
15. Management's response: Management will review and implement procedures to ensure the free or reduced lunch status is properly updated during the application verification process.
1. FINDING NUMBER: 2023 - 002 2. THIS FINDING IS: New
3. Federal Program Name and Year: Child Nutrition Cluster
4. Project No.: 4210-00, 4210-BT, 4210-SC, 4220-00 5. CFDA No.: 10.555, 10.553
6. Passed Through: Illinois State Board of Education
7. Federal Agency: US Department of Agriculture
8. Criteria or specific requirement (including statutory, regulatory, or other citation): For the 3% verifications of applications, the District is required to select error prone applications for households receiving free or
reduced lunch as determined by October 1st. They then request documentation on the household income to verify the information provided on the application was correct and the determination does not need to be changed. If the documentation determines the original application determination was incorrect, they are to change the student's status of free or reduced.
9. Condition: In a population of 3 error prone applications selected for verification, exceptions were noted on 1 of the applications selected for verification. The 1 verification documentation received determined the student should be changed from reduced lunch to paid lunch and this change was not made.
10. Questioned Costs: N/A
11. Context: 3 verification forms were selected from a population of 3.
12. Effect: Student received reduced lunch for the year when they should have paid for lunch.
13. Cause: The District did not correctly determine the free, reduce, or paid status based on documentation received for the verification process.
14. Recommendation: The District should implement procedures to ensure a student's free or reduced lunch status is properly updated during the application verification process.
15. Management's response: Management will review and implement procedures to ensure the free or reduced lunch status is properly updated during the application verification process.
1. FINDING NUMBER: 2023 - 002 2. THIS FINDING IS: New
3. Federal Program Name and Year: Child Nutrition Cluster
4. Project No.: 4210-00, 4210-BT, 4210-SC, 4220-00 5. CFDA No.: 10.555, 10.553
6. Passed Through: Illinois State Board of Education
7. Federal Agency: US Department of Agriculture
8. Criteria or specific requirement (including statutory, regulatory, or other citation): For the 3% verifications of applications, the District is required to select error prone applications for households receiving free or
reduced lunch as determined by October 1st. They then request documentation on the household income to verify the information provided on the application was correct and the determination does not need to be changed. If the documentation determines the original application determination was incorrect, they are to change the student's status of free or reduced.
9. Condition: In a population of 3 error prone applications selected for verification, exceptions were noted on 1 of the applications selected for verification. The 1 verification documentation received determined the student should be changed from reduced lunch to paid lunch and this change was not made.
10. Questioned Costs: N/A
11. Context: 3 verification forms were selected from a population of 3.
12. Effect: Student received reduced lunch for the year when they should have paid for lunch.
13. Cause: The District did not correctly determine the free, reduce, or paid status based on documentation received for the verification process.
14. Recommendation: The District should implement procedures to ensure a student's free or reduced lunch status is properly updated during the application verification process.
15. Management's response: Management will review and implement procedures to ensure the free or reduced lunch status is properly updated during the application verification process.
1. FINDING NUMBER: 2023 - 003 2. THIS FINDING IS: New
3. Federal Program Name and Year: Special Education Cluster
4. Project No.: 4620-00, 4620-EI, 4625-00, 4998-ID, 4600-00, 4998-PS 5. CFDA No.: 84.027, 84.027X, 84.173, 84.173X
6. Passed Through: Illinois State Board of Education
7. Federal Agency: US Department of Education
8. Criteria or specific requirement (including statutory, regulatory, or other citation: The District is only allowed to submit an expeditire once for the grant to be reimbursed.
9. Condition: In a population of over 550 invoices, exceptions were noted in 1 out of 47 invoices tested. The 1 invoice was paid twice and claimed for reimbursement twice.
10. Questioned Costs: $1,400
11. Context: 47 invoices were selected from a population of over 550
12. Effect: The District was not in compliance with only submitting expenditures for reimbursement once.
13. Cause: The District wrote a check for an invoice that was never received by the vendor and did not clear the bank. They then paid the invoice by credit card and did not void the check. The District submitted both payments as expenditures for reimbursement.
14. Recommendation: We recommend the District review procedures for claiming expenditures to determine expenditures are not claimed multiple times for reimbursement.
15. Management's response: Management will implement procedures to ensure an expenditure has cleared the bank before they are claimed as expenditures and remove the expenditure from the grant if they pay in another manner.
1. FINDING NUMBER: 2023 - 003 2. THIS FINDING IS: New
3. Federal Program Name and Year: Special Education Cluster
4. Project No.: 4620-00, 4620-EI, 4625-00, 4998-ID, 4600-00, 4998-PS 5. CFDA No.: 84.027, 84.027X, 84.173, 84.173X
6. Passed Through: Illinois State Board of Education
7. Federal Agency: US Department of Education
8. Criteria or specific requirement (including statutory, regulatory, or other citation: The District is only allowed to submit an expeditire once for the grant to be reimbursed.
9. Condition: In a population of over 550 invoices, exceptions were noted in 1 out of 47 invoices tested. The 1 invoice was paid twice and claimed for reimbursement twice.
10. Questioned Costs: $1,400
11. Context: 47 invoices were selected from a population of over 550
12. Effect: The District was not in compliance with only submitting expenditures for reimbursement once.
13. Cause: The District wrote a check for an invoice that was never received by the vendor and did not clear the bank. They then paid the invoice by credit card and did not void the check. The District submitted both payments as expenditures for reimbursement.
14. Recommendation: We recommend the District review procedures for claiming expenditures to determine expenditures are not claimed multiple times for reimbursement.
15. Management's response: Management will implement procedures to ensure an expenditure has cleared the bank before they are claimed as expenditures and remove the expenditure from the grant if they pay in another manner.
1. FINDING NUMBER: 2023 - 003 2. THIS FINDING IS: New
3. Federal Program Name and Year: Special Education Cluster
4. Project No.: 4620-00, 4620-EI, 4625-00, 4998-ID, 4600-00, 4998-PS 5. CFDA No.: 84.027, 84.027X, 84.173, 84.173X
6. Passed Through: Illinois State Board of Education
7. Federal Agency: US Department of Education
8. Criteria or specific requirement (including statutory, regulatory, or other citation: The District is only allowed to submit an expeditire once for the grant to be reimbursed.
9. Condition: In a population of over 550 invoices, exceptions were noted in 1 out of 47 invoices tested. The 1 invoice was paid twice and claimed for reimbursement twice.
10. Questioned Costs: $1,400
11. Context: 47 invoices were selected from a population of over 550
12. Effect: The District was not in compliance with only submitting expenditures for reimbursement once.
13. Cause: The District wrote a check for an invoice that was never received by the vendor and did not clear the bank. They then paid the invoice by credit card and did not void the check. The District submitted both payments as expenditures for reimbursement.
14. Recommendation: We recommend the District review procedures for claiming expenditures to determine expenditures are not claimed multiple times for reimbursement.
15. Management's response: Management will implement procedures to ensure an expenditure has cleared the bank before they are claimed as expenditures and remove the expenditure from the grant if they pay in another manner.
1. FINDING NUMBER: 2023 - 003 2. THIS FINDING IS: New
3. Federal Program Name and Year: Special Education Cluster
4. Project No.: 4620-00, 4620-EI, 4625-00, 4998-ID, 4600-00, 4998-PS 5. CFDA No.: 84.027, 84.027X, 84.173, 84.173X
6. Passed Through: Illinois State Board of Education
7. Federal Agency: US Department of Education
8. Criteria or specific requirement (including statutory, regulatory, or other citation: The District is only allowed to submit an expeditire once for the grant to be reimbursed.
9. Condition: In a population of over 550 invoices, exceptions were noted in 1 out of 47 invoices tested. The 1 invoice was paid twice and claimed for reimbursement twice.
10. Questioned Costs: $1,400
11. Context: 47 invoices were selected from a population of over 550
12. Effect: The District was not in compliance with only submitting expenditures for reimbursement once.
13. Cause: The District wrote a check for an invoice that was never received by the vendor and did not clear the bank. They then paid the invoice by credit card and did not void the check. The District submitted both payments as expenditures for reimbursement.
14. Recommendation: We recommend the District review procedures for claiming expenditures to determine expenditures are not claimed multiple times for reimbursement.
15. Management's response: Management will implement procedures to ensure an expenditure has cleared the bank before they are claimed as expenditures and remove the expenditure from the grant if they pay in another manner.