Finding 980254 (2023-003)

Significant Deficiency
Requirement
AB
Questioned Costs
-
Year
2023
Accepted
2024-06-28

AI Summary

  • Core Issue: There is a significant deficiency in internal controls over payroll, leading to unapproved and inaccurately allocated costs to the federal award.
  • Impacted Requirements: Compliance with Section 200.405 and 2 CFR Section 200.430 is not met, as payroll records lack proper documentation and authorization.
  • Recommended Follow-Up: Implement monthly reconciliations of payroll expenses and ensure all charges to the federal award are accurately approved and documented.

Finding Text

Finding No. 2023-003: Internal Control over Payroll – Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance U.S. Agency for International Development, USAID Foreign Assistant for Programs Overseas, Assistance Listing Number 98.001. Criteria Section 200.405 of the Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance) indicates that a cost is allocable to a particular federal award if the goods or services involved are chargeable or assignable to that federal award or cost objective in accordance with relative benefits received. This standard is met, among other things, if the cost charged is incurred specifically for the federal award. Also, under cost principles established by 2 CFR Section 200.430, charges to federal awards for salaries and wages must be based on records that accurately reflect the work performed. These records must be supported by a system of internal control which provides reasonable assurance that the charges are accurate, allowable and properly allocated and be incorporated into the official records of the non-Federal entity. Context During our testing of payroll expenditures, we noted an instance for one employee where the time worked on the award did not have support to document that the payroll expenditure was properly approved and an instance where a bonus was awarded to an employee, where the allocation for time worked on the federal award for the specific pay period was used as the allocable base for the overall bonus instead of the period to which the bonus was related. The total amount recorded to the grant related to this was $2,563. Cause There was a breakdown in internal control where one employee’s timesheet was not reviewed by their supervisor. Also, when reviewing the allocable charges to the federal award, there was a breakdown in internal control when preparing the allocation for the pro-rated salary charges incurred related to the federal award. Effect The amount charged to the federal award was not properly authorized. If the compensation costs allocated to the grant cannot be supported in accordance with the Uniform Guidance, the granting agency could determine that these costs are not allowable. Questioned Costs The amount did not exceed $25,000 and therefore is not required to be reported. Recommendation The Organization’s program staff and management should ensure that the amounts charged to the federal award are properly approved and accurate. Monthly reconciliation of all expenses, including of salaries charged to program versus actual hours incurred should be performed timely. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions See Corrective Action Plan

Categories

Allowable Costs / Cost Principles

Other Findings in this Audit

  • 403812 2023-003
    Significant Deficiency
  • 403813 2023-004
    Significant Deficiency
  • 403814 2023-005
    Significant Deficiency
  • 980255 2023-004
    Significant Deficiency
  • 980256 2023-005
    Significant Deficiency

Programs in Audit

ALN Program Name Expenditures
98.001 Usaid Foreign Assistance for Programs Overseas $1.59M
66.309 Surveys, Studies, Investigations, Training and Special Purpose Activities Relating to Environmental Justice $103,932