Finding 964105 (2023-001)

Significant Deficiency Repeat Finding
Requirement
N
Questioned Costs
$1
Year
2023
Accepted
2024-03-28
Audit: 299743
Organization: Saint Leo University, INC (FL)

AI Summary

  • Core Issue: The University incorrectly calculated Return to Title IV (R2T4) amounts due to using wrong withdrawal dates for six out of forty students.
  • Impacted Requirements: Compliance with 34 CFR 668.22(a)(1) regarding accurate determination of Title IV assistance earned upon student withdrawal.
  • Recommended Follow-Up: Review R2T4 requirements and establish procedures to ensure accurate calculations and correct withdrawal dates are used.

Finding Text

2023–001 Return to Title IV (R2T4) Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Program: Student Financial Assistance Cluster Assistance Listing Numbers: 84.063 – Federal Pell Grant Program 84.268 – Federal Direct Student Loans Award Period: July 1, 2022 to June 30, 2023 Type of Finding: Other Matters Finding Related to Compliance and Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance Criteria or Specific Requirement: In accordance with 34 CFR 668.22(a)(1), when a recipient of Title IV grant or loan assistance withdraws from an institution during a payment period or period of enrollment in which the recipient began attendance, the institution must determine the amount of Title IV grant or loan assistance that the student earned as of the student’s withdrawal date. The Code of Federal Regulations, 34 CFR 668.22 defines the last date of attendance for schools that are required to take attendance and those that are not required. Condition: During our testing, we noted six instances out of forty students tested, where the R2T4 calculation performed by the Institution utilized incorrect withdrawal dates. Questioned Costs: These errors resulted in insufficient refunds to the Department of Education totaling $124. This amount includes $54 of insufficient refunds of direct loan funds, and $70 of Pell funds that should have been returned. Context: Incorrect inputs in the R2T4 calculation resulted in the calculation discrepancies. Cause: The University’s policies and procedures did not ensure calculations were properly performed. Effect: The University returned insufficient funds to the Department of Education. Repeat Finding: Yes Recommendation: We recommend the University review the R2T4 requirements and implement procedures to ensure the R2T4 calculations are using the correct withdrawal dates and are completed accurately. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: See Corrective Action Plan prepared by the University.

Categories

Questioned Costs Student Financial Aid Significant Deficiency Matching / Level of Effort / Earmarking Internal Control / Segregation of Duties

Other Findings in this Audit

  • 387663 2023-001
    Significant Deficiency Repeat
  • 387664 2023-001
    Significant Deficiency Repeat
  • 387665 2023-002
    Significant Deficiency Repeat
  • 964106 2023-001
    Significant Deficiency Repeat
  • 964107 2023-002
    Significant Deficiency Repeat

Programs in Audit

ALN Program Name Expenditures
84.268 Federal Direct Student Loans $57.08M
84.063 Federal Pell Grant Program $14.79M
84.007 Federal Supplemental Educational Opportunity Grants $1.07M
84.033 Federal Work-Study Program $571,862
84.379 Teacher Education Assistance for College and Higher Education Grants (teach Grants) $218,305
47.076 Education and Human Resources $136,493
16.525 Grants to Reduce Domestic Violence, Dating Violence, Sexual Assault, and Stalking on Campus $76,379